Burn In Hell, Degenerate: Playboy’s Hugh Hefner Dies At Age 91

Try to bear with me here, because the last thing I want to do is sound like I’m a sort of pretentious moralizer like the kind you see on any televangelist channel.

What I’m trying to say with this article is that Hugh Hefner represented a living example of the “camel’s nose under the tent” metaphor – a type of man who back in the day would have been termed a sexual deviant, and would have been shunned, ignored, and blocked from ever gaining even one iota of influence.

Because despite being a White Man (he was apparently of Anglo-Saxon/Germanic/Scandinavian ancestry), and despite being the creator of something that really isn’t all that weird and twisted, Hefner was part of the predominately-Jewish clique that used our First Amendment to normalize and disseminate smut and filth to the American people.

A fact was known quite well by many who fought to hold back the degenerate tide during past generations.

Hefner’s very existence allowed for an easier shifting of the cultural Overton Window to the Left, for at a whack (off), the hardest part of the battle (allowing any obscenity) had been won – the struggle to push gangbangs, interracial simulated rape, and homosexual orgies was at that point nothing more than a simple hurdle due to the whole legal precedent thing.

I just wonder whether in his last years of life, Ol’ Hugh came to realize just what exactly he had helped to bring about.

Did he have private guilt for his actions?

Or was he too far gone to give a single f#ck?

We’ll probably never know.

New York Times:

Hugh Hefner, who created Playboy magazine and spun it into a media and entertainment-industry giant — all the while, as its very public avatar, squiring attractive young women (and sometimes marrying them) well into his 80s — died on Wednesday at his home, the Playboy Mansion near Beverly Hills, Calif. He was 91.

His death was announced by Playboy Enterprises.

Hefner the man and Playboy the brand were inseparable. Both advertised themselves as emblems of the sexual revolution, an escape from American priggishness and wider social intolerance. Both were derided over the years — as vulgar, as adolescent, as exploitative, and finally as anachronistic. But Mr. Hefner was a stunning success from his emergence in the early 1950s. His timing was perfect.

He was compared to Jay Gatsby, Citizen Kane and Walt Disney, but Mr. Hefner was his own production. He repeatedly likened his life to a romantic movie; it starred an ageless sophisticate in silk pajamas and smoking jacket, hosting a never-ending party for famous and fascinating people.

The first issue of Playboy was published in 1953, when Mr. Hefner was 27 years old, a new father married to, by his account, the first woman he had slept with.

He had only recently moved out of his parents’ house and left his job at Children’s Activities magazine. But in an editorial in Playboy’s inaugural issue, the young publisher purveyed another life:

“We enjoy mixing up cocktails and an hors d’oeuvre or two, putting a little mood music on the phonograph and inviting in a female acquaintance for a quiet discussion on Picasso, Nietzsche, jazz, sex.”

This scene projected an era’s “premium boys’ style,” Todd Gitlin, a sociologist at Columbia University and the author of “The Sixties,” said in an interview. “It’s part of an ensemble with the James Bond movies, John F. Kennedy, swinging, the guy who is young, vigorous, indifferent to the bonds of social responsibility.”

He was a Good Goy.

He broke the old taboos, mocked the traditional responsibilities a man was supposed to hold, and was therefore (whether he knew or not) a battering ram that was used to shatter White society.

It was really quite a brilliant move – warping the idea of the Alpha Male/Chad with his love of women, adventure, and life itself to push an agenda that would in the end ruin men more than anything else ever could.

Mr. Hefner began excoriating American puritanism at a time when doctors refused contraceptives to single women and the Hollywood production code dictated separate beds for married couples. As the cartoonist Jules Feiffer, an early Playboy contributor, saw the 1950s, “People wore tight little gray flannel suits and went to their tight little jobs.”

“You couldn’t talk politically,” Mr. Feiffer said in the 1992 documentary “Hugh Hefner: Once Upon a Time.” “You couldn’t use obscenities. What Playboy represented was the beginning of a break from all that.”

Jules is a Jew, just for the record.

Makes everything he says easier to understand if you know this fact.

In “The Playboy Philosophy,” a mix of libertarian and libertine arguments that Mr. Hefner wrote in 25 installments starting in 1962, his message was simple: Society was to blame. His causes — abortion rights, decriminalization of marijuana and, most important, the repeal of 19th-century sex laws — were daring at the time. Ten years later, they would be unexceptional.

“Hefner won,” Mr. Gitlin said in a 2015 interview. “The prevailing values in the country now, for all the conservative backlash, are essentially libertarian, and that basically was what the Playboy Philosophy was.

“It’s laissez-faire. It’s anti-censorship. It’s consumerist: Let the buyer rule. It’s hedonistic. In the longer run, Hugh Hefner’s significance is as a salesman of the libertarian ideal.”

Muh Libertarianism.

This is why the Alt-Right is against such a foolish philosophy.

It forms the basis for the degradation of society – honestly even faster than Liberalism and other ideologies.

The Playboy Philosophy advocated freedom of speech in all its aspects, for which Mr. Hefner won civil liberties awards. He supported progressive social causes and lost some sponsors by inviting black guests to his televised parties at a time when much of the nation still had Jim Crow laws.

That does it.

For a moment I was starting to pity poor Hugh, and was actually considering changing the tone of this entire article.

I had thought for a second that maybe he was tricked and misguided by nefarious Jews surrounding him in order to dominate and redirect something far more innocent.

Or maybe there’s a bit of both deception and true intentions mixed into the life of Playboy’s creator – the Times piece does go on to describe the Old Man’s hatred of Feminism after a con-job by slimy Jewess Gloria Steinem, and a subsequent claim that he was never intending to warp society too far.

Never mind – right now, Hefner is more than likely viewing the settings of his cubicle deep in the bowels of hell.

About Marcus Cicero 593 Articles
Proud White Man, devoted husband and father, and Occidental Dissent contributor.


  1. Thanks for standing up for sexual propriety. This kind of thing was the beginning, and unfortunately there are even young nationalist males now who openly admit to watching porn and then list the reasons why it’s ok and harmless. Even if it does them and their romantic prospects no harm (a dubious argument anyway), they are in denial about the harm it does to white children when this stuff is everywhere, and their consumption of adult material is supporting an industry that hurts our children. I think that’s the important message that should be focused on. Too many sad addiction cases because young minds were corrupted at ages as young as 10. The protection of our white children is everyone’s responsibility.

    • “Too many sad addiction cases because young minds were corrupted at ages as young as 10.”

      Really? White children and not young blacks?

      • The big issue now is the fact that pornography is now available with two or three swipes/clicks, and is nothing like the nude mags older generations had to make do with – it’s filth the likes of which we’ve never seen before.

        And science through brain scans have shown that minds exposed to pornography develop issues of addiction and chemical imbalances that make it harder and harder to do the real thing.

        And if someone by some bad twist of fate or genetics has something even slightly wrong with their brain circuitry (something so small it wouldn’t manifest in normal societies), then the odds of them turning deviant go up exponentially.

        • A mentally normal White 11 YO is going to be disgusted, not “addicted”.

          According to whom? What are the numbers? Already fatties, feminists (including against porn) and homos make attempts at scientific rationalization for their pathetic lack of willpower. Global warming, the big bang and racial equality are “proven” even to smart people. A morbidly fat amputee will also “prove” that married men lives longer.

          Shutting down natural selection is that kills civilizations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unoMMru4-c0 I´m all for using free food that is bright and coloured with high fats and sugars level, free coca cola, free meth and so on as part of a slow-mo eugenic policies as most people will not realistically accept more old school solutions, even after the current System is shut down.

          • Disgusted in some situations, but if already going through puberty, they’re going to likely look for more (drives are drives). Jews openly admit they market their smut to cater to the young, and have only gotten better at it throughout the years.

            We have plenty of young men in the Alt-Right that would admit to struggling with porn in their younger years (some still do).

            Willpower is one thing (and I’m pretty hard on degenerates and “addicts”), but certain substances and things produce addictions – whether it’s mental or actually physical depends on what you’re talking about.

            And porn has been widely shown to be a highly-addictive and highly-damaging “substance.”

            There are literally thousands of studies proving this.

            I’m just confused as to what you’re arguing for.

            Would you just let things like hardcore pornography remain untouched and unregulated?

  2. Post WWIi America was full of uptight squares, so it was inevitable that hep cats like Heffner, Elvis, James Dean and Jack Kerouac were going to come along and shake things up. Unfortunately the jews and coloreds got involved and ruined the fun.

    • Very well said Spahn. Sexy artists, rebels it’s like socialism. The Whiter forms of sexy rebellious music, art like Elvis, James Dean, or Jack Kerouac work well, the anti White degenerate Jewish director forms do not work right.

      Remember Elvis made a pilgrimage to President Nixon offering to lead an artistic crusade to defeat John Lenon and Yoko Ono who were corrupting America’s youth to Communism.

      Elvis served in the regular army.

      Also remember another artist – a vegetarian, animal rights activist who led a Socialist Workers Party.

      This “Liberal”, Leftist, Socialist is arguably the greatest White leader of the 20th century. Who was he, what did he believe about

      Labor policy
      Individualism vs the needs of a nation

      We’ve presented his views in a short 44 pages book – The Essentials – $12 postage and handling included

      Contact us:


      • Everybody should scroll down to read Jack Ryan’s inspired interpretation of Hellstorm, entitled ‘Crazy’ sung by Patsy Cline.

        Seriously, anyone considering buying anything about GERMAN National Socialism off this slimy charlatan needs to be reminded that he has gone out of his way to deny german innocence on various occasions regarding the Holohoax, and is not one percent german or even germanic.

        • Jack Ryan is Exhibit A as to why our movement needs genetic and racial purity tests.

          Dumb and brainwashed Slav Catholic morons like himself should’ve never been allowed into the United States to begin with and allowed to further infest our gene pool.

    • Uptight squares that allowed jews to take over, elected Woodrow Wilson 50 years before Hefner wrote his piece, then open the US to non-White immigration just a few years later.

      I´d call that a massive fuck-up and can see why Whites rebelled even if they were horribly spoiled brats and were misled.

  3. Playboy was erotica – not anti White, degenerate hard core porn, prostitution etc. Playboy published intelligent interviews (George Lincoln Rockwell) and never took an openly anti White, anti Southern party line.

    Men, boys are always going to be interested in sex, sexuality in some ways. It’s a part of media success. Sex sells. Men like Rupert Murdoch become huge media powers in what’s left of the White world by using sexy women, topless women, page 3 girls in the UK Sun newspaper.

    We need media in the alt right that is like Murdoch’s UK Sun – promoting nationalist, populist politics, White sports and some sex in a non degenerate way.

    No we’re not going to be promoting the slut pop celebrity “Madonna” getting F******* by a Puerto Rican in a Catholic Church, no we’re not going to be marketing any kind of porn to children, but yeah – a Playboy Bunny club – my friend and I went to one in Southern Wisconsin and had a legal beer when we were 18 – the waitress was in a bunny outfit, very attractive, very sexy – nothing degenerate or anti White.

    White civilizations of Greece and Rome had goddesses of love and fertility – look up the grandchildren of most of these Playboy bunnies from the 1960s and 1970s – I’ll bet you’ll find lots of healthy, intelligent White folks.

    And if some 9 year old at a Summer boys camp in Minnesota has a nude Playboy centerfold from the 1960s hanging over his bunk bed, if I’m the director of the camp and the boy tells me the nude centerfold is the boy’s grandmother, I’m going to complement the lad – he has a good looking grandmother.

    • That’s one of the main arguments that the Jews will use against someone speaking against porn – “Oy vey. Don’t you know the ancients used nudes? Are you saying they should be banned too?”

      My response would be that they’re two entirely different categories – the statues depicting healthy bodies and nudes portrayed as art have nothing in common with the filth Jews like to promote.

      In a healthy society in which Jews have no presence and especially no chance at gaining power/influence, something like Playboy could probably exist without any real issue.

      With Jews, however, they’ll just find a way to corrupt things while using Goys like Hefner as the rebellious fronts (for a time).

      And just for the record, most of Europe has always been more open about sex and the human body than the United States – what they have pretty much always allowed on British and German television, for example, is crazy.

      • Dad taught me a single rule about how to tell porn from art.

        “It ain’t art if you can’t take Mama and Gramma to see it.”

        Served me well.

    • Jews will also always argue the following:

      “Oy vey, Goy. Don’t you know that we helped to get you men more pussy than ever before by mainstreaming pornography? Those prudes back in the day never got any women.”

      That’s of course a full out lie. Men back in the day did well enough with women, did not have the mind-rotting filth that pornography is (scientifically proven), and had far fewer issues with sluttery, Feminism, fapping beta cucks, perversion fetishes, and other degeneracies than modern men have today.

      And then Jews and Libertarian morons like Hefner came along, told men that they were being repressed and could have it all if only they rebelled, lived for the moment, and basked in a hedonism that was designed to make it seem like anybody living this way would become an Alpha with whole harems of women ready to serve his every need.

      Appealing to the base natures we all have, and we ended up in a situation worse than any White Civilization has ever seen – even the lowest and most decadent period of the Roman Empire was a Puritan society compared to ours.

      In their time, trannies and open queers were still mocked, shunned, and even killed if they happened to be a member of the ruling class.

      We celebrate them…

      • But pornography has always been around in one form or another. Even Ben Franklin had a few dirty magazines stashed away. And back in those earlier, more “wholesome” times many young guys had their first sexual experience by going to the neighborhood brothel, sometimes with Dad or Grandpa.

        But not to worry, I think Generation Zyklon is going to un-do the mess that previous generations have made of things.

        • If my husband, his father, or my father ever took my son to a brothel, they’d need an army of doctors to remove all the lead. If my son, as an adult, chooses this path on his own, well then, there’s something else I’ve done wrong; but, hopefully, no one would have the courage to tell me.

          The world’s oldest profession has roots in the world’s oldest problem.

          It’s all mind control.

    • You’re a degenerate, Jack, What a creep! Only you would imagine a 9-year old boy having a nude pictorial of his grandmother over his bed. Wow, just wow! Your lady friend needs to get back on her bicycle and keep peddling…… faster and faster in the opposite direction of YOU! Beyond creepy.

      Let’s see you try to weasel your way out of this one. I now agree with Denise, you are a kike if only in mind.

      • No it wasn’t only me. This comes from a New Yorker cartoon back in the 1950s. Let me see if I can track it down – it is as I stated it – all White boys camp with a boy with a tasteful topless pin up poster over his bunk bed:

        The adult camp councilors say:

        “We can’t make him take it down because it’s his grandmother”.

          • No. I thought it was funny. Anybody that can’t enjoy a joke, can’t enjoy a laugh – these humorless creatures will drag down pretty much any and all political movements, social organizations, families, communities.

            AH had a good sense of humor and he enjoyed life. He had good taste in music, architecture and women.

            Everything is not gloom and doom. Lots of good things happening in the world. Get off the net go find some positive people who are enjoying life.

            Have a laugh get a life.

          • “No. I thought it was funny. Anybody that can’t enjoy a joke, can’t enjoy a laugh – these humorless creatures will drag down pretty much any and all political movements, social organizations, families, communities.”

            Just like I thought. Humor? Yeah, right. You never noticed the implication or maybe it’s darker.

      • I should have wrote “pedaling” since I was mostly educated in a Christian school and we do know how to spell and generally have proper grammar and punctuation although sometimes it isn’t apparent.

    • I always thought there was something hinky in Hefner’s family tree especially when I learned that he got the money to start Playboy from his mother. I ask you … what kind of CHRISTIAN White woman would help her son in such a venture? Moreover, Hugh Hefner does not look Germanic or Anglo Saxon. Particularly, as he aged, his eyes got more Asiatic looking and his coloring, even for a brunette, seemed … off. I would not be the least surprised if he had some sort of Marrano in his background. Something crypto. But he looks increasingly like a tare in the wheatfield to me.

      Jack Ryan, you dismiss a lot of damage Playboy initiated in the culture. Shortly after Playboy was published, No Fault Divorce came out in Oklahoma. Though Betty Freidan wrote The Feminine Mystique ten years later, no one paid much attention to feminism, because even women felt that Freidan was so homely she should have been grateful that she found a man to marry her instead of whining.
      That all changed when Gloria Steinem (who made her mark as an undercover Playboy Bunny) took over the helm.

      After No Fault was signed into law in California by Ronald Reagan, a divorced politician with presidential ambitions, it spread all over the land and men all over the country made their threat to trade their forty year old wives for trophy brides in their twenties. Child Support was not enforced until the nineties, so the term Displaced Homemaker became quite common throughout the eighties.

      After watching their mothers forced to take jobs in convenience and retail stores to support their children, feminism really took off in their daughters who were determined to see to their own financial security rather than trust their husbands. Now it is the women who initiate divorce at such a rate that men got involved in the MGTOW movement preferring to remain childless rather than be divorced and end up on the hook for child support. Piping in porn did more damage, making celibacy much easier for men to the point that they preferred masturbatioh to real women. So yeah, I’d say that Playboy did real damage.

      • Thank you Cly. Many many allegedly pro-White men forget, rather conveniently, that mass acceptance of porn, thank to (((Hefner’s))) “nice” porn, occurred approx. a good 15-20 years before (((feminism))) took hold. Feminism was REACTION to men abandoning their wives and children to chase Bunny Life. The Girls of Porn never age, never get puffy from normal child-bearing, never get cranky after taking care of kids all day – there are no children in fact, excepting the porn revolving around children – are never menstruating, always look “perfect”, no matter that most of the porn pic girls are benefitting from superb make-up, lighting, and costume artists, and photographers. Even the young ones don’t look that way 24/7. They are always ready to go, 24/7, and “go away” when the masturbatory climax occurs. There are no mortgages, no illnesses, no family issues – just sexual fantasies available at the ready, 24/7. No actual woman can compete with this.

        Why get married, create children, and put down roots when you can have all that?

        No wonder feminism took hold.

        Remember that divorce has been glamourized by Jewlywood since the 1930’s.

        Men, who abandoned their wives and children, in respectable circles, used to become absolute pariahs and social outcasts., in some ways even more than errant women. The upper classes always have had lovers outside of marriage. Playing around takes time, money ,and discretion, There were rules to the game. You didn’t break up your marriage, because marriage is the absolute foundation of social stability. You took pains to avoid humiliating your spouse, and embarrassing the family. Discretion was the key word, in every way. A man who ran out on his family was regarded as dangerous; if he was willing to leave his own flesh and blood to the wolves – what would he do to his associates in business, etc?

        Hefner’s “cute” Bunny world changed all of that……

        I repeat – mass acceptance of Jew feminism was a reaction to Jew porn.

        • You forget to mention, Denise, that real women also have eyes and see all of real men’s flaws. It goes both ways but Playboy’s entire premise was that judgment only issues from the male side of things. It commodified women, particularly white, and infantilized men.

          It was the literal blueprint of what became a rape culture everyone pretends doesn’t exist.

  4. “And if some 9 year old at a Summer boys camp in Minnesota has a nude Playboy centerfold from the 1960s hanging over his bunk bed…..”

    A healthy 9-year old boy should have NO DESIRE to see titties and hooch, and any healthy-minded adults around him should not be encouraging or facilitating it.

    Sorry Jack, I am not surprised you’re selling this as morally healthy. Everything today is sexualized and it all started with magazines like Playboy. I can guarantee you the original intention was always to sexualize everything in order to morally decline society, especially a Christian society.

    These types of magazines promote and glorify narcissistic, self-absorbed, exhibitionists. They are marketed toward the sexual aspect of nudity and not, as some claim, an artistic standpoint. The sexual positioning, facial expressions (open mouth, etc.), other visual teasing are all purely done to sexually arouse the viewer. And, forget about the advertisements. I wonder if these rags still peddle merkins?

    If you want to see nudity in an art form, go visit a museum. If you want to whack off, go purchase a smut mag.

  5. Playboy (along with Snoopy), went with the troops into Vietnam. Marilyn Monroe was on the cover of the first issue. Commander Rockwell, Norman Mailer, Kurt Vonnegut and other interesting, important people were interviewed by that magazine. It really was a big part of American pop culture for a while. But by the 1990s it was no longer relevant.

    • You, being a sandnigger, have no idea what that (((popular))) culture did to white people. Entertainment by then just like war was a business run by jews.

      • I think you need to see a new shrink. Try Dr. Ira Kaplan at Manhattan Psychiatric Services on Park Avenue and E.92nd Street in New York. He specializes in treating hysterical and delusional broads like you.


          • I’m willing to bet he doesn’t even see the reinforcement of your argument.

            I suspect that those that take a supportive view of these deeply-seeded morality attacks do not wish to end the daily pubescent euphoria they experience each time they see nudity anywhere and everywhere. The constant bombardment of these visions provoke the same feeling as if each time was the very first time. That’s an organic mechanism that is very difficult to break. Personally, I would think every male above the age of 15 would be completely bored of them by now, if not turned off by such an abundance in freakish alien forms.

    • LOL – I changed that comment, but it’s true.

      At least without Jews we’d be able to do things like create statues like the Ancients without worrying about Schlomo adding to the exhibit to make it an interracial gay orgy statue set.

      With ANYTHING even remotely sexual, we now have to worry about Jews warping it into deviancy and degeneracy.

      It’s strange, but a study of the Jews will show they are the most sexual-minded people that have probably ever walked the Earth, and that this sexual mind almost always strays into the weird and perverted.

      Even Medieval scholars wrote about this topic much the same as we do today – nothing has changed.

  6. In many ways, Hugh Hefner has harmed relations between white men and white women, but even so that pales in comparison to what the Jews have done. The purpose of them pushing black men with white women was to demoralize white men and to convince impressionable young white women to spread their legs for blacks. Nevertheless, Hefner will not be remembered positively for his hand in the horrid state of relations between white men and women. Moreover, the older he got, the more evident the toll his degenerate lifestyle became on his body and mind.

  7. Here’s Playboy Magazine’s 1966 unedited interview with American White Nationalist leader George Lincoln Rockwell:


    Playboy broke the Jewish media mafia monopoly policy of not giving any media coverage to GL Rockwell.

    The best part about Playboy interviews is that they were done by and to intelligent people, unedited – not carefully scripted anti White, anti Southern fake news we get now.

    • I think you’re very mistaken. Rockwell was a minor trade off compared to corrupting generations of Americans. A small sacrifice for a huge, whopping gain. Don’t be fooled by little distractions.

      • A very (((purposeful))) trade off. Salve wounded white men’s egos while pimping out their wives and daughters was the strategy.

        Judaism is a forked-tongued serpent.

  8. As in most cases, the best commentary on American popular culture is done by worldly British Expats who sadly saw their British Empire and Merry Old England taken away.

    Here’s the immortal John Derbyshire who I have had the pleasure of his personal company – a scholar and a gentlemen in the very best Brit sort of way. The Derb reprints his 1996 commentary on Hugh Hefner and Playboy -his view is that Playboy Magazine world is pretty damn close to being… one of us.

    “Leafing through Playboy, you would never know that the great social revolutions of our time had happened. Gay liberation, feminism, affirmative action, the rise of the internet — barely a mention. Even the revolution in race relations from the 1960s on might never have taken place. There are almost no black people in this issue of the magazine. Of the 115 naked breasts on display (yes, I counted them — no labor too arduous in pursuit of truth), not one is black. All but half a dozen are Caucasian. If you exclude the ads, in fact, I think there is only one picture of a black person. She, however, is a former (January ’04) centerfold model, pictured here clothed, at some sort of convention. There’s nothing racist about Ner, or Playboy. The first black centerfold showed up in March 1965, and there have been many since. The paucity of black faces (or other parts) in this particular issue likely just reflects the fact that we have come right through the racial revolution and out the other side, to a place where Playboy feels no obligation to fulfil any race quotas, either one way or the other.

    Similarly with feminism. To anyone who fears that our colleges and universities are dominated by politically-correct dogmas, enforced by grim crop-haired feminists, Playboy’s 10-page section on Top Ten Party Schools offers welcome reassurance. Here are 40-odd corn-fed American college girls stripped to the buff, in blithe ignorance of, or defiance of, all the labors of Betty Friedan, Germaine Greer, and Andrea Dworkin. Not one of the girls is identified as pursuing Women’s Studies. (The majors identified are: Communications, Art, Biology, Education, Public Health, Communications again, Nursing, Pharmacy, Interior Design, Math (hey!), and Drama.)

    The famous centerfold offers further evidence of the essentially static and, yes, conservative, nature of Playboy. Her texture, her pout, her poses, her accessories, the lighting, are as stylized as a Kabuki drama. These things were settled long ago. What need to change them? True, you see a bit more of the lady than you did back in 1960, but only a very little bit, and the constraints of the soft-porn format mean that there is no further distance to be traveled along this road. To be perfectly frank, I found Miss May about as sexy as a ball bearing. Those college girls, by contrast, actually look like actual people you might actually meet somewhere, and are correspondingly more interesting.”

    • Go dip it in gook, wannabewhitey.

      That is, if your Viagra hasn’t run out already. You and your Amren poseurs are flaccid dried up delusionals who missed the memo.

      No nation for old white mama’s boys.

  9. Hefner was a Hebe. A lot of Yids were / are Cryptos. There was great info on SF. His RACIAL status has been scrubbed. Lot at his visage. Even when young his nose drooped below his earlobes.

    • No Hugh Hefner was the son of a Presbyterian minister as our own Jared Taylor was the son of Presbyterian missionaries doing a mission in Japan. I’m asking our Hunter Wallace to include another rule for the comments guide:

      No false accusations that somebody you don’t like or everything wrong in the world is done by Jews. Huge Hefner was not Jewish as our great Alt Right writer John Derbyshire has noted Playboy magazine presented a world virtually free of

      Black AA anything
      Feminism anything
      Bad Lib Leftist politics anything
      Pro Zionist, Neo Conservative anything

      If Hug Hefner had been Jewish none of this would have been the case.

      Hugh Hefner’s childhood and early adult was very WASP Midwestern the original Playboy After hours and the Playboy building was in the Midwest – Chicago – not Jewish New York or Jewish Hollywood. The Jews did not, still do not run the culture of the Midwest/Chicago. They finally got their first political leader in Chicago or in Illinois the Chicago mayor – that’s a first.

      OK, so the comments section is falling down again – people shouting foolish things, spreading gossip

      • I never sensed any jew agenda at work in Playboy Enterprises. Or in Penthouse and Hustler, for that matter. You kind of know when jews are around. You can either recognize them on sight or, failing that, you can identify them by the jewy kind of stuff they always say and do.

        • Nigga wat?

          Haven’t both magazines featured interracial sex scenes?

          I know Larry Flynt was shot for promoting race-mixing.

          • Larry Flynt is a good ol’ boy from Kentucky with an obscene sense of humor. Bob Guccione was a real guinea, with his gold chains and flamboyant guinea lifestyle. Al Goldstein was a true jewish pornographer, a caricature straight out of Der Volkisher Beobachter.

          • But then we have to argue – does an obscene sense of humor (not always horrible by itself) give someone the right to push interracial filth to the population?

            I would say no due to common decency and racial hygiene, some would say yes because of the First Amendment, and Schlomo would ask if they could include gay sex with the filth.

          • Ah yes, another one of those “all men are scum” feminists. I’ll bet you have purple hair and wear “problem glasses”. Most angry young lesbians do.

          • Oh try another desperate tactic.

            Why is it weakling men always seem to think they can hide behind other ‘men’ when confronted on their patheticness?

            You don’t speak for men, and you aren’t even white.

      • They’re called falsified biographies. Anything is possible in our manufactured reality.

        Hefner is a German name and that ain’t no Aryan.

  10. Definitely could have been a crypto. I would question the source of his original investment or maybe it’s just because mommy was a Jew. He literally was paraded out and glorified by every element of the control mechanism. Maybe the enterprise was part of Monarch mind control.

    The Jews only print positive articles that benefit their deviant mission, celebrates members of their own tribe, or non-Jews who work tirelessly for their cause. Look at the demonic carving in the woodwork. At first, I thought I saw a Star of Satan, I mean a Star of Saturn, I mean a Star of David. That mansion always looked dark and gloomy inside like they were getting ready for a human sacrifice in the dungeon. He walked around in a smelly, semen-stained robe….. isn’t that common in the porn industry?


    Good riddance!

  11. You’re on the right track now to gain – and not lose – support of most white Americans for a new all white Confederate States BY SPECIFYING WHICH “JEWS.” Not just saying “Jews.” Well done sire ! Keep up the GOOD work. Thank you.

    • You put shit out there that’s controversial and then cry and whinge for ‘moderators!’ You sound just like a jewboy. If I hadn’t seen pics of you I would think you were one, frankly. And no, you don’t really look like a ‘WASP.’ Aryan perhaps, but not in your character. That’s what matters.

      The fact is, I have always assumed Hefner was a jew and no one has jewdar as sharp as mine. His face absolutely looked jewish and everything about his career screamed it.

      Playboy was the most obscene, even more obscene than the worst filth I haven’t even seen precisely because of how cloaked and sly it was.

      Nothing has done more damage to relations between white men and women than his brand of ‘liberation.’ What makes Playboy so grotesque is how it masquerades as ‘just sex’ when it’s pure power. Women’s nudity is always presented as existing for men. Like these women in the pictures actually get off on you or some bozo ogling them.

      The nakedness isn’t what’s offensive. It’s the depraved fantasy that it sells of entitlement to that naked woman.

      If you don’t think plenty of white men haven’t become psychotically warped by Playboy’s jew misogyny you don’t belong here, frankly.

      Stop trying to profit off of germans and germanic women. You’re a fucking slav and sandnigger cocksucker and you need to leave, Jack Ryan.

      I would absolutely be ashamed to show my face next to yours in public. That tough KKK in C’ville guy not so much. But your brand of mercenary pimp on full display here has no place in any aryan movement.

        • Snowhitey are you not picking up the absolute psychosis of ‘white men’ like Jack Ryan hearing some women reject him (and all his delusions) as WANTING him?!!!

          Are you not getting how these young women feminists became themselves so warped? Their problems took root in the clear psychosis of neurotic weakling men literally reconstruing female rejection of them as female rejection anxiety.

          It’s incredible to behold. But hopefully JR’s willingness to shed light on his hardcore mental problems will educate those still trying to grasp how it all went down, and why whites cannot continue to abide the jewification of our people from either side of (((the gender wars.)))

      • Oh dear

        Here’s a great classic song to maybe explain some things, help to ease the pain.

        Crazy – Patsy Cline song written by Willie Nelson


        “Crazy, I’m crazy for feeling so lonely
        I’m crazy, crazy for feeling so blue
        I knew you’d love me as long as you wanted
        And then someday you’d leave me for somebody new
        Worry, why do I let myself worry?
        Wondering what in the world did I do?
        Crazy for thinking that my love could hold you
        I’m crazy for trying and crazy for crying
        And I’m crazy for loving you
        Crazy for thinking that my love could hold you
        I’m crazy for trying and crazy for crying
        And I’m crazy for loving you.”

        • This is Exhibit A for White Male Derangement Syndrome aka Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

          No woman here loves you, Jack Ryan. No white woman anyway.

          But thanks for demonstrating how psycho men rationalize that no means yes.

          Go suck some roman cock. You’re exactly the shanty irish type Krafty’s always warning about.

        • Do nutcases like you project that white women want to be raped because deep down you want some guy to stick it to you? Isn’t that at the heart of your Roman Catholicism?

    • This is what you get for having deleted madam’s and gg’s comments several weeks agoregarding the 9/11 anniversary. Did you really think there would be no repercussions from that dastardly act?

      • “…You put shit out there that’s controversial and then cry and whinge for ‘moderators!…”

        Yeah I really hate this too. He post on 9-11 then deletes all my comments. I might add all were factual and couldn’t be argued with. They were based on physical events not conjecture.

      • We White Females recognize what a little toad Ryan is. He’s a weasel. A craven jew boot licker. He tried to get me banned for rightfully fighting that bagel nigger faggot rabbi. That will not EVER be forgotten or forgiven.

  12. Since the early days of Playboy, Hefner advocated for gay rights, gay marriage and integration along with miscegenation. He was the definition of the “enemy within the gates”. His “Empire” paved the way for the degenerate entertainers like Miley Cyrus, Katy Perry, Beyonce Knowles, Larry Flynt (of Hustler fame) and the jews that peddle the current porn that has consumed America.

    Burn in Hell, Hugh.


  13. I’m still trying to get past the headline that called Sarah Silverman a “brilliant actor.”

    By the way, Playboy also promoted the plastic surgery industrial complex by constantly featuring “silicon grown” women. The mag is a major reason women in the public eye went from looking like humans to poorly-designed robots.

  14. The worst thing about Hefner is we can’t even blame him on the Jews or fags! Nupp…..he began as one of us.
    Its a wonder he didn’t die of AIDS or something.
    Looking at images of him from earlier decades, he hasn’t been much to look at since at least the early 70’s. What was his appeal with younger women? Oh yes, money. Sorry.
    Other than seeing him as a male slut, I didn’t have much of an opinion about him.
    The consensus among most would be that he did what he loved, and didn’t hurt anyone in the process.
    I personally feel that he did a lot a damage to the family unit by promoting smut and devaluing marriage and commitment to one person.

  15. Was Hefner a Jew? I believe he was from a Crypto-Jew family. I looked up his surname in a Jewish name list several years back, and Hefner was on the list.

    • I’ve heard the Jew thing brought up before about Hefner, although it just seems unlikely that there were many of them in rural Nebraska (where his parents were from) around the turn of the 20th Century.

      My assumption has always been that he was a slight deviant, went to the big city, rebelled like many youth do against whatever the establishment is at the moment, and got surrounded by Jews that pushed him further and further to the Left.

    • @Stephen,
      I had a look at the Jewish surname database a few days ago. There looked to be more names on that list than the entire Jew population on the whole planet. I think the researchers threw them on the list rather liberally and relied on questionable research or criteria. I wouldn’t be surprised if my surname (Gibson) was on the fucken thing.
      I’m sure Hefner is not Jewish according to my own research, but there may be evidence of it thats not on the record.
      I never state the Jewish ancestry of someone if I don’t know it for sure.

    • Yes, Stephen, he was a jew. His father wasn’t a farmer as many accounts claim; he was an ACCOUNTANT. Much is made of his supposed ‘Puritan’ ancestry. Like Steinem, he went from beginning journalism to launch a huge magazine – with one Marilyn Monroe on the cover – overnight. This is just one of many clear indications.

      The sheer fact that there is so much camouflage around Hefner’s background, some of which is clearly false, suggests (((someones))) out there do not want the public to know its true character.

      I attended jewish nursery school, and excel at all the nuances of languages – not just grammar but accents, intonations, inflection patterns, you name it. Once I had to deal with a ‘Polish Catholic’ guy who could have passed for slav fairly easily (although not particularly fair). Certain flags were raised for me immediately upon encountering the guy, much of it linguistic. Most couldn’t tell him from the average Joe native of the NJ county he came from.

      I could. I knew. And guess what? I later found out his parents (not sure if one or both) converted to Judaism during WWII. It wasn’t clear that he himself had even known before this discovery.

      I could have sussed this guy out a mile away based on linguistics, the vocal inflections and rhythm and spiritual idiom, if you will, of his language. His relational patterns, even physical cues far slighter than Hefner’s clearly semitic nose (and no, it’s no throwback to the roman administrators of England) all screamed jew. To me that is.

      I am the best there is and my antennae go off the meter with this Hugh Hefner.

      He was at least part jew.

  16. I’m not sure what to think about Hugh Hefner. He was a bit of a degenerate but it’s true he had some major excellent journalism that wouldn’t have ever seen light if Men didn’t want to see girls tits. He could have just printed the tits and made much more money.

    It seems to me his magazine never became pozzed like most porn and that means something. We could make the same argument for showing girls tits leading to degeneracy as we can short dresses and dancing. What he did was not a major crime against humanity in the big scheme of things. I certainly don’t blame him for divorce and Feminism.

Comments are closed.