G.W. has responded to my previous post with more poorly constructed straw man arguments. For future reference, a straw man is a logical fallacy in which an arguer attempts to refute his opponent’s position by attacking a caricature or misrepresentation not held by his opponent. Some of us learned in high school to avoid this type of irrational argument.
1.) G.W. continues to utilize the smear that his critics are Nazis. In fact, he is the one who is obsessed with National Socialism, writing about “Nazis” seemingly every other day. I have explicitly stated on numerous occasions that I am not a Nazi and have little interest in European politics. Yet this fact never seems to register over there.
2.) I haven’t said anywhere that Jews “conspired” to take over Ivy League universities. The Jewish community openly agitated and lobbied against anti-Semitic quotas and character tests.
3.) I haven’t written anything about Jewish conspiracies, period. There is nothing secretive about the political agenda of organized Jewry in the United States. Their coordinated lobbying efforts are out in the open.
4.) I haven’t written anything about Auschwitz or whether or not Jews had a pool there. I don’t have the slightest interest in the Holocaust.
5.) I haven’t said Jews are evil because they are overrepresented at American universities.
Moving on to the various inane rebuttals …
[Organized warfare isn’t the same as crime. Also, people change over centuries.];
That’s precisely my point: within a race, the rate of criminal violence varies wildly across history, societies, and social strata, so much so that it calls into question the sweeping racial conclusions that RRs draw from unrepresentative samples. The early Vikings raids were criminal enterprises; little more than banditry along Europe’s seas and rivers. This behavior was common in the Early Middle Ages, but is unknown in modern Scandinavia.
[Despite myths of the Wild West, its crime rate was not that much higher than today’s America, and lower than most major cities.]
Cite your sources.
Not anymore, and that was due to a collapse. Most Russian gangs are/were Moslem.]
According to Wikipedia, Russia made the Top 5.
[No, we do not. Try reading before talking.]
A content analysis of your blog would show otherwise.
[The Flynn Effect showed no narrowing of the IQ gap and it may be that people are just better at taking the test. I certainly don’t believe that Thomas Jefferson would be classified as retarded today just because he lived two centuries ago.]
This is nonresponsive. I said that IQ scores were malleable across history, not that the racial gap was narrowing, but now that you mention it the racial gap has narrowed somewhat. Even Rushton and Jensen have admitted this.
[What about whites who arrived here recently? Orientals and Asian Indians? Most millionaires were born into middle-class or lower middle class families.]
European immigrants (Irish, Germans, Italians, Slavs) settled in a society in which they were undeniably privileged (formally and informally) by their skin color. The deck really was stacked against non-Whites throughout most of American history. I don’t have any problem admitting this.
[doesn’t effect today’s generation who weren’t even alive at the time.]
Sure it does. Travel through any small town in the South. You will find plenty of families (such as mine) that have inherited landed wealth from their ancestors. Correspondingly, you will find families (white and black) that got stuck with the short end of the stick in the distant past. It is a bogus conservative myth that capitalism is completely fair and transparent.
[But this economy was created by whites. Non-whites were free to build their own America in their own Third World hole.]
You’re slipping out of RR now.
[All of it was answered at length on this blog, and others.]
Where?
[But if whites cease to exist, then there will be none of that small fraction.] ,
Whites aren’t going to cease to exist any time soon. We’re slipping into minority status, but its not like we are going to extinct. Anyway, “whiteness” alone doesn’t translate into scientific and technological accomplishment; 90%+ of Whites contribute nothing new here. This is a really weak argument.
Acknowledged on this blog the very first time some readers decided to yell at me for not toeing the party line.]
Then why the constant rah-rahing about inventions?
The post wasn’t about you. Just cited your quote. It was a general statement anti-Semites and Third Reich admirers. You were cited for the 5 things that RRs believe. All the other claims were vs. others.
Is there anyone who thinks that this was written by someone other than a socialist? If you think that a socialist wrote it, you are right – a National Socialist who believes that the Third Reich is the best regime of modern times.
This is cut whole cloth out of thin air. I’ve said a thousand times now that I am not a National Socialist. Racialism goes back centuries in America.
So much for the Nazis being our allies in any way, shape or form. Ultimately, they have an obsession with Jews, rather than a concern for whites or the truth.
As it happens, there wasn’t an ounce of truth in your post that I am responding to.
So much for the Nazis being our allies in any way, shape or form. Ultimately, they have an obsession with Jews, rather than a concern for whites or the truth.
So you now profess to know my academic history? That’s quite interesting.
It only takes an IQ of 115 or so to get into a PhD or JD program (the average is about 125, but half the people are below that number), so your personal failure is clear proof of your less than stellar intellect. Now go back to writing puns that rhyme with “Guy White”, Sparky. It’s all you are good for.
Did you ever happen to learn the definition of politics?
Do you think the Federal Republic of Germany (from a pro-White perspective) is an improvement over the Third Reich?
“The post wasn’t about you. Just cited your quote. It was a general statement anti-Semites and Third Reich admirers. You were cited for the 5 things that RRs believe. All the other claims were vs. others.
“… The post wasn’t about you. Just cited your quote. …”
Than MAN UP and at least have the COURAGE to quote Prozium, or source any other quote you cite from SOMEONE’ ELSE’S WORK, YOU FUCKING PUSSY!!!!!
I don’t think that Rushton and Jensen believe that the Black-White IQ gap has narrowed at all. In fact, they have even hypothesized, based on research by Charles Murray, that the mean IQ for Blacks is actually 78, not 85, which would raise the Black-White IQ gap to 22 points. This hypothesis is based on the fact that the lowest scoring segments of the Black population are rarely ever tested.
Guy whites viewpoints are hopelessly republican and mainstream.