Alex:
How do you square up being in favor of racial profiling of Arabs with your stand against racial “collectivism”?
How come you haven’t, in your years of standing up to collectivism, written a single article critical of Zionism?
Are you opposed to deficit spending if it’s necessary to perpetuate the Iraq War?
Would you favor or oppose the right to selectively abort gay fetuses?
Knepper is a Satanist who hates Christianity. I’ve been asking around about him. The reason he went to that Odinist pagan festival is because he hates Christianity. The rumor is that he was also having a good time bashing Christians with Spencer before the discussion took a racial turn.
A homosexual Satanist who hates white people, he’s quite a character.
I’m glad Spencer put the fear of Thor in him!
Knepper is attacking Spencer because he is an opportunist trying to advance his career. He knows the score on race.
If that story is even true, I wouldn’t doubt that he’s compulsive liar. Even if it were, that festival has nothing to do with Richard Spencer.
I wonder whom Spencer has more respect for, Jews or Christians?
P.S. Spencer should really see a speech therapist about that lisp of his.
He knows the score on whose ass to kiss to advance his meager career that’s for sure.
Knepper is attacking Spencer because he is an opportunist trying to advance his career. He knows the score on race.
Sounds like Guy White.
What career does Guy White have? He doesn’t know the score on race.
Spencer doesn’t have a lisp.
Woah, woah, woah — back up, now, Comment #1. Please oppose me for what I am — not what I am not! I attended that festival out of curiosity; I was invited by a white nationalist. Spencer wasn’t even at the festival. But yes, I’ve taken part in some Christianity-bashing. I bash all religions.
I do enjoy LaVeyan Satanism, though; I own most of the books that the Church of Satan has published. I like it because it’s got a dark, gothic aesthetic that blends the lifestyles and philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche, Ayn Rand, and Aleister Crowley into one, pro-life (as in — vital existence) blender. And it’s got a wicked sense of humor, too — it never takes itself too seriously. The entire thing is tongue-in-cheek. That’s why I love it.
As for racial profiling: that’s a very old blog of mine — I’ve also lost about seventy pounds since then! — but I do still support racial profiling. I do not believe that it should be mandated by the government, but I’m for realism about the matter. The fact of the matter is that Islam is the ideology behind the terrorism we’ve seen, and that young, educated Arab males are the ones most likely to carry out these attacks. If young, skinny white boys started doing it on a regular basis, I’d support profiling for people who look like me. It’s an inconvenience, not an oppression. I’d certainly not advocate any laws that deny man’s rights to Arabs, and I certainly don’t think that suicide bombing is intrinsic to Arabism. The race, again, is merely a coincidence: it’s the ideology that matters. It just happens to more often be found in young Arab males!
LOL @ the person who said I was attacking Spencer to advance my career.
Like me, Spencer is a relative nobody. I write for my own happiness, intellectual development, and — sometimes — amusement. I enjoy the back-and-forth, with people from the mainstream to the fringe. I’ll always engage — I love the forbidden, the unapproachable, the discourse that exits the bounds of mainstream society. This is why I don’t approach you people like the idiotic SPLC does: I actually bother to reply to the points. I don’t think they’re any crazier than the statist claims that leftists advance.
What career does Guy White have? He doesn’t know the score on race.
(I meant this half-kiddingly of course.)
‘Guy Trite’ is a failed lawyer, who definately knows the score on race and the ‘JQ’.
This is why he is such a congenital liar for them and always, always advocates on behalf of their interests — NOT OURS.
“I do enjoy LaVeyan Satanism … The entire thing is tongue-in-cheek.”
LaVey was a Jew that made a career of satirizing and desecrating Christian symbols. He’s an early version of Piss Christ or Madonna with Dung. Jews culturally attacking Christianity has been mainstream for a long while; Larry David and Sarah Silverstein carry on the tradition.
The Jew nature of neo-conservatism should be perfectly obvious since they are against all racism, except against anyone Israel doesn’t like. They are all for immigration into white countries – except for Muslims, that Jews don’t like. They want to racially profile Arabs, but would never suggest profiling blacks or mestizos for crime – again, the Jew thing.
It’s all so blatant.
Matt, I have a question for you: Is this man white? http://www.frenchcreoles.com/Pictures/PBSPinchback.jpg
13 – Boo hoo hoo, why don’t you cry some more? He desecrated Christian symbols? — Yes! That’s right. Because religion is not immune from criticism. He went after Christians, Muslims, Hindus, and religious Jews with equal fervor. What he hated — was faith. Blind belief in authority. And yes: collectivism.
The difference between racial profiling for blacks is that it’s usually done in the name of victimless crimes: drugs, for example. I don’t think that there should be checking for that in the first place! Now — there’s no way to check for other crimes: how can you tell in advance whether someone is going to murder or rape? — You can’t. On planes, you can tell — he’s got a bomb.
Alex,
Congratulations on the weight loss.
Why have you so carefully avoided criticizing Zionist collectivism?
Do you believe that Jews should be racially profiled for financial crimes?
Are you seriously claiming that Blacks are no more inclined to criminality than Whites? (Drug crimes excepted)
Mark,
It’s hard to make a determination with a grainy black and white photo like that. But I’m going to go ahead and say “No” on that one.
So you end up checking a bunch of innocent guys who don’t have bomb until you manage to catch the guy who does. But you do it anyway because you know from statistics that it is the muslims who are most likely to do it.
That is no different than saying we should scrutinize blacks more because they are at seven times more likely to commit violent crimes than blacks. Now, it is valid to say that one cannot precisely decipher one’s intention to rape, rob, or murder, but beyond just being black, the police can look at criminal records, outstanding warrants, possession of weapons, or possession of drugs.
Those things in combination of being black means you are pretty likely to have found a future law breaker. If you’re going to say “hey, how do you know for sure..?” then I would reply, “how do you know the guy with a bomb isn’t bring it for show?” 🙂
Narcotic addiction isn’t victimless, in fact it victimizing families, not just individuals.
Blacks also commit far more violent crimes and theft. When even fellow black cabbies, postal workers, and delivery drivers won’t go to black areas you know there’s a problem.
I have criticized Jewish collectivism — no need to hide behind the word “Zionism,” the word is Jewish — many times, publicly. You can read the comments I made at FrumForum right now, to see. There is no double-standard. I loathe all racial collectivism. I can’t help but admire the Jews, though, insular as many of them are (and most of them are not, really). — Jewish culture has produced so many intellectuals, so many scientists, so many great thinkers — that it’s impossible not to conclude that the root of anti-Semitism — the singling out of Jews for opprobrium — is envy.
In the current state of the dominant black culture, yes — blacks will be more inclined to crime. There’s a serious problem in black culture. I attended a 20% black high school. The divide was appalling — how can it be that we exist next to a sub-culture that thinks that getting a good education is “acting white”? (Oddly, the women are the ones achieving the most, on the whole, in the dominant black sub-culture.) But there’s absolutely no way of profiling that (how on Earth do you profile for assault? That’s literally impossible), and either way, the trade-offs aren’t good enough. Checking someone at an airline line is one thing — beginning the building-blocks of a police state against the mostly-innocent is quite another.
“Those things in combination of being black means you are pretty likely to have found a future law breaker.”
Sorry, this isn’t the movie Minority Report. If you find a machine that can tell us the future, please tell me.
“Narcotic addiction isn’t victimless, in fact it victimizing families, not just individuals.”
So the proper solution is lock up the user? Give me a goddamned break! Yes, it victimizes people, but what I mean is that force is not imposed. You need to get over this “Mary Poppins view of life” (as Camille Paglia put it) where just the right amount of government intervention can shield you from life’s inevitable pitfalls. There is no good solution to drug addiction — but the worst of all is to lock up people who are exercising their right to their own body! — Yeah, that’ll help the wife and kids!
“Blacks also commit far more violent crimes and theft. When even fellow black cabbies, postal workers, and delivery drivers won’t go to black areas you know there’s a problem.”
There is NO WAY to profile for this. It CANNOT BE DONE.
Its funny how Alex, in the same paragraph, condemns racial collectivism and then turns around and praises Jewish racial collectivism.
We’re not interested in profiling for a specific crime, heh.
Now, my position is that we should have freedom of association – which means the freedom to have exclusively white neighborhoods. But with that said, if we are talking strictly about profiling, again, there are observable factors that correlate with the likelihood to commit future crimes.
So wait, adding a racial characteristic to detective work all of the sudden is building a police state? LMAO.
Okay, I’ll ask the question. How do you know a guy with a bomb plans on detonating it on the plane? I mean, its a stupid question obviously, but if you’re going to refuse to acknowledge that a black person, or any person really, with a laundry list of crimes, outstanding warrants, and a PCP habit is very much likely to commit an act of violence, then you’re a reality denier.
“I loathe all racial collectivism.”
The real question is this – who cares about Alex Knepper (evidently, some shabbos goy getting a paycheck from a neo-con) – or what he loathes, or his political opinions, or how “consistent” he is with his “libertarianism?” I mean, he seems a bit more lucid than Jeffrey Imm, but again – so what? Does anyone actually read Knepper – or Imm?
I ask this OD: who, aside from OD readers, have ever heard of Knepper and who is willing to “debate” with him about “true libertarianism” or whatever, aside from us?
Why is there this presumption that their arguments are worth debating? Especially for the low level interns, why even bother? Other than as a target for satire or mockery, there’s no point.
I’d rather debate with other whites that I disagree with.
“Blacks also commit far more violent crimes and theft.”
There is NO WAY to profile for this. It CANNOT BE DONE.
If it could be done we can assume Alex would support it. That’s good to know. Alex supports racial profiling of blacks if it could be done.
And of course there is an easy way to have the exact same results as if there were pin-point profiling available: racial separation.
Isn’t that amazing!
So the proper solution is lock up the user?
More importantly the distributor. The user needs an intervention because their mind and body are chemically dependent, it’s not simply a matter of choice anymore. They need rehab therapy and constant supervision, not just thrown into jail. Society doesn’t benefit by having millions of addicts and people selling dope.
I can’t help but admire the Jews, though, insular as many of them are (and most of them are not, really). — Jewish culture has produced so many intellectuals, so many scientists, so many great thinkers — that it’s impossible not to conclude that the root of anti-Semitism — the singling out of Jews for opprobrium — is envy. – Alex
__
And its people like yourself, Alex, that are doing the envying –
There is NO WAY to profile for this. It CANNOT BE DONE.
Why ban people from trying?
How about we let the market decide: remove all laws mandating integration, and allow for example taxis, restaurants and hotels to exclude blacks. If races really are equal, the market should eliminate racism because the ‘racist’ taxis, hotels, restaurants, etc will be forced out of business by the nonracist ones.
“Blacks also commit far more violent crimes and theft.”
There is NO WAY to profile for this. It CANNOT BE DONE. – Alex
—
If it could be done we can assume Alex would support it. That’s good to know. Alex supports racial profiling of blacks if it could be done. – Lockerford
__
I ‘cannot’ be ‘done’ simply because it will not be done — since it is not in ‘our’ elites long-term interests.
However, profiling Arabs is.
“I do enjoy LaVeyan Satanism, though; I own most of the books that the Church of Satan has published.”
What is your take on David Myatt (Order of Nine Angles)??
Michael Moynihan?
http://books.google.com/books?id=xaiaM77s6N4C&pg=PA213&dq;#v=onepage&q=&f=false
“How about we let the market decide: remove all laws mandating integration, and allow for example taxis, restaurants and hotels to exclude blacks. If races really are equal, the market should eliminate racism because the ‘racist’ taxis, hotels, restaurants, etc will be forced out of business by the nonracist ones.”
I completely support this.
As far as the “Who reads me?” question — I’m a young guy. I’m still in college. However, my work has been featured (so far) on sites as diverse as the New York Times, C-SPAN, CBS News, Jihad Watch, and the Independent Gay Forum.
“So wait, adding a racial characteristic to detective work all of the sudden is building a police state? LMAO.”
No, fool! Having police roam around towns looking for people who otherwise aren’t doing anything is. Life isn’t like an airline line!
I see these questions are added.
“Are you opposed to deficit spending if it’s necessary to perpetuate the Iraq War?”
Unfortunately, yes: we don’t live in a domestic capitalist-libertarian paradise. Just because the government is spending on things it oughtn’t doesn’t mean we should stop it from spending on things it should.
“Would you favor or oppose the right to selectively abort gay fetuses?”
This was the argument that turned me pro-life, actually. I’ve been pro-life for a couple of months, now.
I’m assuming you are familar with Ayn Rand’s stance on abortion.
No, fool! Having police roam around towns looking for people who otherwise aren’t doing anything is. …
The same ‘courtesies’ should also apply to ‘hicks and rednecks’…, I would hope?
I’ve been pro-life for a couple of months, now.
Now he’s pro-life which will of course require coercion on the part of the state to stop people from performing and having abortions.
So much for the ol’ “consistent philosophy”. So much for classical liberalism.
One hell of a counter-point in Post #27 there, H. Rock White! If there was real legal freedom of association in Make-Believe-America, Whites would likely command a much stronger sense of ethnic identity, and a racial/national future.
Knepper: “I’ve been pro-life for a couple of months, now.”
LOL nice!
Who cares about this attention seeking fag libertardian? There are more important subjects to care about than some random Randroid bitch boy who gets paid by the neocon Jew Frum, subjects like the need to profile the Jewish Mafia Collective for extensive economic crimes against the White race.
Oh Geez. The Church of Satan? Are you for real?
Howard Stanton Levey was a Jew carny. A sleazy little Jew carny. His idiotic and puerile “religion” was just another carny sideshow. He even incorporated animal masks – just like the carnival animals – into his rituals. People joined up with him for the drugs, and the sleazy sex.
I knew people who “practiced” that inanity. I was struck be the sheer cartoonish childishness, and worse- the dullness – of it all. (And please point out the mockery of Judaism, in the Church of Satan. Musta missed the wicked mockery of Judaism).
The Catholic priests, that staged the first Black Mass, in France, staged the whole affair with a lot more glamour, art, and sense of theater.
Gosh – for a homo, you aren’t very interesting. Homos used to be brilliant, gifted, inspired, and inspiring. Da Vinci, Michaelengelo, Wilde………….
Liberalism, and “freedom” has ruined homosexuality. Homos, now, are far less imaginative, sophisticated, and daring, than the subjects featured on the People of Walmart webiste.
Tsk tsk….sad.
I’ve never heard of her, before the Spencer/OD spat, and this is Alexis’s 15 minutes, believe me.
OD gets far more comments than Frum Forum.
In all fairness to Alex Knepper, he seems as if he is a decent guy, and he is certainly is a reasonable debater with us (far FAR more so than Jeffrey Imp was), so I feel there is no problem in keeping a civil and respectful debate going with him if he so wishes.
Seriously gang, we can all learn something from eachother when we talk to one another … who cares who is ‘right or wrong’ … or who is ‘winning or losing’ a debate and/or a discussion.
So, unless someone is behaving like ‘Red Jeffrey’ — let’s keep the conversational momentum civil and productive. We certainly could use the practice in properly debating, and constructively challenging, those who disagree with us.
13 – Boo hoo hoo, why don’t you cry some more? He desecrated Christian symbols? — Yes! That’s right. Because religion is not immune from criticism. He went after Christians, Muslims, Hindus, and religious Jews with equal fervor. What he hated — was faith. Blind belief in authority. And yes: collectivism.
So, out of fairness then, you Mr. Knepper must obviously be against ‘Holocaust Denial’ laws that IMPRISON people for merely speaking an opinion?
Am I correct then, sir?
There are alot of Satanists that are also Racialist.
Don’t throw out the baby with bath-water.
WhoCares,
I agree that we should also host investigative reporting. These kinds of posts are, however, more valuable than you’re giving them credit for. When we invite people from other movements and media outlets to engage us, we’re networking. We’re exchanging ideas. We’re becoming a part of the debate. It’s a good thing.
Alex,
I hope you stick around. White nationalists need to have their ideas taken scrutinized and taken seriously but others. I guess what I don’t understand is the demonization. When an anti-racist conservative debates a liberal or a leftist, conservatives generally treat them as well-meaning but misguided, often stupid, people. When you debate a racialist, they’re not just misguided, there is something MALEVOLENT about them, and their ideology. Why is that? I know it is common to conflate national socialism with communism (anti-national or international socialism, if you will) — at the same time, it seems as if national socialists (or extreme right) is treated with much less respect than the extreme right, even by conservatives. Why is that? What makes NATIONAL socialism worse than INTERNATIONAL socialism? Would have an equal objection, or acceptance, to hiring a communist, or a “neo-nazi”, to teach in a high school, for instance?
sorry that last post really needed proof read. Hope you get my point: what makes nazism worse than communism, and extreme rightists more malevolent than xtreme left.
Landser:
The
Church
of
Satan?
Err….sorry. That does….not…impress me.
Heath – if you really want to cite brutal Satanic wickedness – the genuine article – at least go for Crowley. At least he was brilliant writer.
“So, out of fairness then, you Mr. Knepper must obviously be against ‘Holocaust Denial’ laws that IMPRISON people for merely speaking an opinion? Am I correct then, sir?”
Yes, you are correct.
“I’m assuming you are familar with Ayn Rand’s stance on abortion.”
Yes. She was wrong. I’m a Rand admirer, not a Rand-worshiper.
“The same ‘courtesies’ should also apply to ‘hicks and rednecks’…, I would hope?”
Of course.
“People joined up with him for the drugs, and the sleazy sex. ”
You’re an idiot. LaVey hated drugs.
“OD gets far more comments than Frum Forum.”
That’s because FrumForum requires that you make a user name and log in to comment.
“Heath – if you really want to cite brutal Satanic wickedness – the genuine article – at least go for Crowley. At least he was brilliant writer.”
Crowley was an idiot, but he did write in gorgeous prose.
“When an anti-racist conservative debates a liberal or a leftist, conservatives generally treat them as well-meaning but misguided, often stupid, people. When you debate a racialist, they’re not just misguided, there is something MALEVOLENT about them, and their ideology.”
I happen to agree with this. I see nothing more dignified about a statist than a racialist.