Alternet writer “can’t wait for whites to become a minority in 2050”

50 Comments

1. It will certainly come before 2042. However, the date is of little significance. What matters is that our people rise up and retake our country back or secede from the multiracial Union.

2. @MLGS: If you don’t care about the official statistics, then why bother?

   I didn’t say I don’t care about official statistics. They are useful, and I certainly care about statistics of racial demographics.

   I said I don’t care if the Census Bureau considers some group “white.” A group does not become part of my racial ingroup because the Census Bureau considers them “white.” Whether a group is defined as “white” or not does not change racial facts and differences. If the Census Bureau waves its hand and changes its definition of “white,” that does not change the reality of our ongoing racial dispossession.

3. Joshua,

   If I’m unclear, I’m sorry. Here we go:

   First Hunter says: “Joshua, You’re a fool. Demographics are trivial in places like Detroit, Los Angeles, Birmingham, Newark?”

   You reply: “Second, you’re asserting that correlation is causation.”

   I assumed that meant that you’re stating that race and DNA has nothing to do with the deplorable behavior of these non-whites; that there is no causation.

   Thus my question meant: even if it’s all society’s fault, if the liberal victim/wah-wah mantra is true, why should 21st century Whites suffer for it, in any way shape or form. See Hunter’s infestation comparison.

   Clearer now?

4. Quick reality check: do you or do you not acknowledge that the idea of dividing the U.S. into separate “ethnostates” is one embraced by a very, very small minority?

   Of course I am aware of the state of public opinion today. Is there any white racialist who isn’t?

   If you acknowledge that reality, and given that you (admirably) eschew bloodshed, then what do you propose? It’s not like all white Americans want to be divided into ethnically-pure enclaves. So how would you achieve your pristine utopia without violence?

   I think most people only have a hazy idea of what the consequences of multiracialism will be in the long run. If we spread information about how racial destruction is an inevitable consequence of multiracialism and provide a positive vision for the future, hopefully we can attract people to the preservationist position and get them to value racial preservation. The aim is to build a mass movement whose goal is geographic racial separation and the partition of the United States into ethnostates.

5. @lockeford: I don’t see how anyone can know that, as the statistics everyone uses are the ones the Census Bureau collects, and they only include the categories that they list.

   @MLGS: Ok, forget the Census Bureau.

   Look at it this way: if you sat down 100 Americans and asked them, 99 would say I’m white. Yet I don’t count as a real European according to you because one branch of my family were Jewish Europeans. The 1 out of a 100 who didn’t consider me white would probably read this site.

   So I’m checking “Caucasian” on the census and the majority of the people in this country would say I’m white.

   So, what is it you really care about? Other whites who share your worldview? OK, then say that.

   I used to have a roommate who was about as white as anyone could imagine. Scots-Irish on one side, English on the other, and pale as a ghost. He was from Georgia, had a heavy drawl and loved country music and guns. But I’m guessing you would have hated him. He was also a liberal, liked to date women of color and while he was a Christian, he absolutely hated conservative evangelical preachers.

6. Joshua,

   Most people don’t want ethnostates at this time. No one is under any illusions about that.

   To make it work non-violently will require something like re-embracing a Confederation-like vision and separating what areas one can voluntary along racial lines. If the solution is non-violent it obviously can only be done through persuasion and politics, although some kind of financial solution could present itself if enough money were directed/donated/raised towards the WN vision.

   As for Denmark I can only say every European country I know of is flooding their country with non-white immigrants so it seems pointless to keep on trying to move.

7. So I’m checking “Caucasian” on the census and the majority of the people in this country would say I’m white.

   That’s an argumentum ad populum fallacy.

   You look a bit odd even for a Jew, especially a mixed Jew. What is the rest of your lineage?

8. You know MLGS, there’s something that reminds me of Marxism in there.

   They believe that if only workers would develop a sense of class consciousness, the world would be transformed. Reading through the comments here, I get the sense that a lot of folks believe that if only whites would develop the proper sense of racial consciousness, everything would work out.

   The Marxists thought it was inevitable, but it just never happened. I submit that your expectations will work out the same way, because there are a lot of whites — even whites according to your definition — who are just fine living and working with people of different ethnicities. Their lives are good enough, just like the “workers of the world,” and they’re never going to unite.

   I’m glad you’re realistic about public opinion. I’m sure we can agree that you could never poll the population on white-nationalist views, because many people who agree with you wouldn’t tell a pollster about it.

   But we can extrapolate. About 80% of Americans are “white” (according to the official statistics). But only around 30% self-identify as “conservatives.” I don’t hold the view of some liberals that all self-identified conservatives are white supremacists. It’s a sub-set of a sub-set of white Americans.

   So keep in mind that if you’re not thirsty for blood — and, again, thank you for that — you’ve got to convince a whole bunch of “white” Americans to embrace your racial consciousness.

   We shall see if you fare better then the Marxists …

9. I’m as amused by reading Josh’s responses as he is reading “Nazi” responses. He thinks we’re genocidal throwbacks and I think he’s a typical genocidal anti-White. It’s a total disconnect.

   BTW, did he ever apologize for calling us trash? Or as he likes to say, white trash? LOL. He’s so blatantly anti-White yet thinks he’s some sort of easy-going, peace-loving guy. He’s never responsible for anything he says.

   As I like to say, might is right. His position has the might at the moment, but I’d like this guy to think about what would happen if the roles were reversed and his anti-White philosophy suddenly became as popular as Hitler is in the 21st century. What if we did to non-Whites and anti-Whites what you have done to us? Every action has an EQUAL and opposite reaction.

10. So, what is it you really care about? Other whites who share your worldview? OK, then say that.

    No. I don’t believe in the “proposition nation.” Nations are based on ancestry. My family members may do things I dislike, but they are still my family. Many of my co-ethnics are woefully misguided, but they are still my co-ethnics. I don’t write them off because they subscribe to a certain political ideology. I want to see the survival and preservation of as much of my race as possible. There are only a small minority who are beyond salvaging: Those who have non-white children and those who are unshakably committed to the destruction of their own race.

11. @nordicreb: thanks, that’s much clearer.

    Ok, here’s a little introduction to actual liberal thinking.

    Let’s take a hypothetical community of color that has all sorts of social problems — poverty, high crime rates, teen pregnancies, etc.

    The proprietor of this blog would attribute those problems to the fact that most of the members of this community are, say, black, and call it a day.

    Liberals note the following problems:

    High crime, drug use and other social problems are found in poor communities, regardless of race.

    The largest group of Americans under the poverty line are whites. And they have the same problems.

    Meanwhile, some ethnic minorities have joined the middle and upper classes. Those people, while still ethnic minorities, experience those social problems no more frequently than do affluent whites.

    So, there are a number of variables that determine where various communities end up. And we see that the primary causal relationship — not the only one, but the main one — is economic, rather than predetermined according to ethnicity. Now, having said that, I should also clarify that most liberals will tell you — and I totally agree — that class and race are closely intertwined and hard to separate.

    That was a serious if brief answer to your question.

12. For crissakes, MBG, you may not agree but I definitely consider myself to be white!

    I mean, seriously. I’m 40 years old, and nobody has ever questioned my whiteness before I visited this website. When I get pulled over, I’m never scared of the cops randomly kicking my ass — that’s proof!

    Yes, what a disconnect this conversation is. Probably more so for me than for you. I mean, aren’t you accustomed to being called a Nazi? I’m definitely not.

13. MGLS, stop and listen to yourself for a moment.

    Who in the world could be “unshakably committed to the destruction of their own race?” And why? What could possibly cause someone to embrace such a bizarre unshakable commitment?

    Perhaps you’re misinterpreting events. You know, Occam’s Razor and all that …

14. you’ve got to convince a whole bunch of “white” Americans to embrace your racial consciousness.

    Or embrace maintaining true diversity, which in any meaningful sense means preserving distinct races. Otherwise diversity just means the slow, soft death of White traits.

    So a commitment to maintaining true diversity could lead to voluntary racial separation as well. This could come from increased awareness of benefits of biological preservation or some kind of Green ideology instead of a ‘white awakening’.

15. We shall see if you fare better then the Marxists

    Perhaps we white racialists will not succeed and our race will continue to decline and proceed down the path to racial destruction. Maybe our cause is quixotic. Nonetheless, we have a duty to try to achieve racial preservation, even if the odds are long. If the conditions and message are right, it is possible to move public opinion and achieve our goals.

    If we do nothing, racial destruction is guaranteed. Even if we do not succeed, we still owe it to future generations to try to achieve racial preservation.

16. One thing I really don’t understand is why it is okay for Joshua to make the ‘anti-white-trash’ comment when making whatever would be the equivalent for blacks or some similar group would be considered unacceptable.

    In some ways Joshua’s revised phrase is more precisely reflective of the classist, status-seeking “anti-racist”: happy to oppose the supposedly unacceptable members of Whites while shoveling money towards non-whites of a similar or even lower class.

    What a sordid display.

17. MGLS, stop and listen to yourself for a moment.

    Who in the world could be “unshakably committed to the destruction of their own race?” And why? What could possibly cause someone to embrace such a bizarre unshakable commitment?

    I don’t believe there are very many people like that. As I said, it is a very small minority. Nonetheless, there are a few people who are, for whatever reason, unshakably committed to their “One World” ideal and the destruction of their own race. White members of a group like Students for a Democratic Society are the sort of people I am talking about. I don’t know what motivates them. Perhaps they are nihilists who hate the world and want to tear it down, or maybe they became alienated from their own race for some reason.

18. 113 Joshua Holland wrote:
    ‘
    MGLS, stop and listen to yourself for a moment.
    ‘

    Joshua Holland, stop and listen to *yourself*. Do you notice the fact that you’re intellectually dishonest? I’m guessing you don’t. However, from my perspective, every comment you have made is a study in mendacity.

    Remove the plank from your own eye before attempting to remove the splinter from MGLS’s eye.

19. MGLS, stop and listen to yourself for a moment.

    Who in the world could be “unshakably committed to the destruction of their own race?” And why? What could possibly cause someone to embrace such a bizarre unshakable commitment? – Joshua

    I think Steve Sailer sums up rather cogently and coherently the inner motives of the types of White folks that are at least indifferent, if not necessarily outright hostile, to the long-term interests of their co-ethnics.

    White anti-white racism is a broadly fashionable attitude that extends far beyond loonies like Ignatiev. I don’t believe I’ve ever seen it formally explained, although Tom Wolfe’s novels show it in action.

    The usual explanations of what drives whites like Ignatiev are “white guilt” or “self-loathing.” But does Ignatiev appear as if he personally feels guilt or self-loathing?

    No—he sounds like he’s having the time of his life arguing that you should feel guilt etc. He comes across as an arrogant, hostile jerk who thinks the world of himself.

    He wants to feel that he’s better than other whites and to rub their faces in it. The bad guys in his book are Irish Catholics and Anglo-Saxon Protestants. Ignatiev himself is neither.

    And this is typical, in my experience: whites who proclaim their anti-white feelings don’t really care much about blacks or other minorities, pro or con. What they care about is achieving social superiority over other whites by demonstrating their exquisite racial sensitivity and their aristocratic insouciance about any competitive threats posed by racial preferences.

    To these whites, minorities are just useful pawns in the great game of clawing your way to the top of the white status heap. Which, when you come right down to it, is the only game in town.

    http://www.vdare.com/sailer/whiteness.htm

    *I don’t believe that Joshua feels and thinks of others, Whites or non-Whites, in the way this article describes (I think he is genuine and sincere in his beliefs), but it does seem like it describes the observable actions and motives of many White Liberals AND nearly all ‘aracial’ White Conservatives. I would be interested in his opinion on this.

20. OK, Lockeford, we both know that we’re not going to agree on what “white traits” are other than lower melatonin levels in the old epidermis.

    So let’s assume, for the sake of a civilized argument, that the folks here are “racialists,” rather than racists; you don’t hate anyone, you’re just concerned with the interests of your fellow “co-ethnics” like any other group. For the sake of argument.

    And you’re a realist — you know this white nationalism stuff is,at least today, pretty fringey.

    Ok, your problem remains that you have a very large group of white people who are currently working in a cubicle next to a black dude with an awesome sense of humor, lusting after the Latino chick downstairs, playing poker every Thursday in mixed groups, etc.

    You’re not going to get those people — folks who pretty much see the world like I do, even if they’re not suspect, jewey whites — through politics or educational. You’re not going to bring about a voluntary, nonviolent physical separation of ethnic groups. The likelihood is as close to zero as you can get.

    But — and this should make you feel better — you can preserve the pure, white, Northwestern European blood that courses through your veins. And I’m sure you will.

    See, there’s always been a strain of white supremacy in America’s political culture, just as the U.S. has always had liberals in one form or another.

    I was raised in the liberal tradition, and if I were to fall for some awesome, hot chick of color tomorrow, that’d be fine by me, and fine by my family. We would miscegenate, raise “mud people” — as some of your brethren like to say — pop some popcorn and be quite happy.

    You, on the other hand, can and probably will raise (or already have raised) your own children according to your own beliefs. So they will most likely grow up believing what you do — the overwhelming majority of us do — and they’ll seek out pure Northwestern European whites with whom to mate.

    So, really, you have no problems. Whatever the number of “pure” Northwestern European whites there are today who don’t care to intermingle with other ethnic groups should remain more or less constant simply by educating their kids to be “racialists,” as they no doubt will.

21. I mean, seriously. I’m 40 years old, and nobody has ever questioned my whiteness before I visited this website. When I get pulled over, I’m never scared of the cops randomly kicking my ass — that’s proof!

    Because you’re not a negro that must mean you’re White… no.

    It’s rather just a testament to how far our country has degenerated.

22. No, Mark, ordinary people would consider me “white” because I’m a tanned person of European descent.

23. Jews do not originate from Europe, they refer to themselves as Semites. You can’t have it both ways, Semitic and European.

    Skin pigmentation does not solely define race, otherwise a lot of NE Asians and mixed race people would be White. Traditionally America defined race by ancestry, not by skin tone. An albino Negroid is not White.

24. Joshua Holland: “Whatever the number of “pure” Northwestern European whites there are today who don’t care to intermingle with other ethnic groups should remain more or less constant simply by educating their kids to be “racialists,” as they no doubt will.”

    Let’s bring this to this to the racial level. I am a racial preservationist, not a Nordicist. In the scenario, we are discussing, we have an obstacle in the mass media and society. The propaganda found in the media, schools, churches, friends, social networks, and clubs are virtually all encouraging mass miscegenation between Whites and all of the other races-and thus overriding the guidance of pro-White parents.

    Even healthy young White women who are sexually repulsed by Black and Latino men are being peer pressured into miscegenation with these two groups-against their wills.

    I am also worried that a community of White Americans seeking to network, to ensure intra-racial mating and thus genetic survival, will be forbidden much like the neighborhood covenants were.

25. We originated from Europe, and we call ourselves “Americans.”

    “Traditionally America defined race by ancestry, not by skin tone.”

    Traditionally, America has defined race in all sorts of ever-shifting ways. Or more specifically, the definition of “white” has changed repeatedly. And I mean in the mainstream, where it really counts for something politically and socially, not here.

26. Can I remind you that I came over here from liberal-land for a visit.

    I don’t know what this means: “I am a racial preservationist, not a Nordicist.”

    Please define your terms. Others on this board talked of Northwestern Europeans, which I assume is not limited to Nordic people.

    And is a Norwegian Jew OK in the eyes of a “Nordicist”?

    This white nationalism stuff is complicated. You know, when it comes to defining the nation.

27. If Asians and black Africans live in Europe for a few generations, then move to America, that does not make them European or White. You’re conflating national identity with race.

    America had legal standards of White, which were much stricter than the muddled concept of so-called “ordinary” people of today. The founding stock were Northwestern Europeans, not swarthy Levantines.

    You’re not fooling anyone here, so stop with the charade already.

28. “I don’t know what this means: “I am a racial preservationist, not a Nordicist.” ”

    Meaning, I accept more than just Northwest Europeans in my White American genepool.

29. I support including all geographically indigenous Europeans, White Caucasian West Asians (i.e. Russians, etc.), and even some White Middle Easterners.

30. I am not advocating for an ethnostate; I am talking about a (at least de facto) White American genepool.

31. With all due respect, when has separation of peoples been peaceful?

    The Liberia project and the Indian Removal Act were relatively peaceful.

    All that is lacking is the will of White people, and I believe we could come to a mutually beneficial settlement with the non-White population.

32. … and even some White Middle Easterners

    There’s no such thing.

33. Mark, even other people here seem to understand that “the white people” aren’t with you.

    Do you acknowledge that white nationalists represent a very small minority in this country?

    Again, only 28% of the population will even tell a pollster that they identify as a “conservative.” And some of those people aren’t white.

34. According to the US Census Bureau 2008:
    German Americans (16.5%), Irish Americans (11.9%), English Americans (9.0%), Italian Americans (5.8%), Polish Americans (3.3%), French Americans (3.1%), Scottish Americans (1.9%), Dutch Americans (1.6%), Norwegian Americans (1.5%), Swedish Americans (1.4%), Scotch-Irish Americans (1.2%), Russian Americans (1.0%), and Welsh Americans (0.7%) make up 58.9% of the White population.

    Counting non-Europeans and significantly racially mixed people as White has greatly inflated the White percentage. If some of you want to include these people you are doing a disservice to racial preservation.

35. Why are you asking questions about the obvious? If the majority of Whites were White nationalists we wouldn’t be having this discussion nor would this blog be necessary.

36. Joshua,

    Did you ban us from Alternet? You said something to that effect in the comments over there. tsk tsk, we’d never ban you over here.

    The complacent white Americans you describe who don’t care about race, are going to get a big wake up call with this contracting economy. I’m a community activist and I volunteer at community gardens. I hide my views according to the doctrine of Taqqiyah, and I watch others. One thing I noticed is that in a majority black/Hispanic city, the community garden volunteers and stakeholders are all whites. This is what Professor Kevin Macdonald calls “implicit Whiteness.”

    In addition to implicit Whiteness, I noticed a very strong right wing tendency among the better volunteers.. I drop a remark about “People who would be unfit parents should be sterilized” and I hear agreement and laughter. Some liberals at the community garden wanted to make a couple of raised bed rows “for single mothers.” I said, “take care of yourself first. I don’t see these single mothers anywhere around.”

    A lot of surplus wealth, distributed by an anti-white government/corporate system, artificially maintains multiculturalism. When I get to deal with ordinary Whites on the street, not in a government or corporate sponsored setting but rather on a “level playing field,” I am able to quickly make progress in deconstructing the false consciousness of white guilt and so-called “anti-racism.”

37. Thanks for the clarification, Steve.

    So let’s talk about sex! How do you propose to protect this genepool?

    I mean, a lot of white people live in diverse, densely concentrated and liberal-minded cities. That means interracial sex will happen, and lots of it. Human nature, etc.

    So you don’t advocate an ethnostate. No geographic separation. How are you going to deal with the reality of the all-powerful human sex drive?

38. Joshua, you must admit that prior to the Civil Rights movement and especially before WW2, and even more so before the Civil War, the vast majority of American Whites, and really Whites worldwide were huge racists and White nationalists/ethnonationalists. That’s what the liberals keep telling our impressionable children in school. It wasn’t so long ago that White racialism and nationalism were taken for granted. This has always been the normal behavior of Whites.

39. So you don’t advocate an ethnostate. No geographic separation. How are you going to deal with the reality of the all-powerful human sex drive?

    Good grief. I see we have somehow managed to launch into silly space.

    Of course you need the ethnostate.

    Or at a minimum voluntarily separated communities within a larger state that supports the legal right to separation.

40. I said I “do not advocate the ethnostate.” Not that I would “vehemently oppose it even in the ideal conditions without taking military force against the U.S. Federal Government.” I do not even want to debate the 100% racially exclusive ethostate issue.

    On the inter-racial (and inter-subspecies mixing) sex part, I will not fall for your trap. But, I will share that, miscegenation would not be as common as it is, without today’s mass media propaganda.

41. Kievsky: yeah, you guys were banned over there. Thanks for not banning me here in retaliation.

    We have straightforward rules (which I didn’t set). AlterNet is a relatively mainstream outlet.

    When I was younger I flirted with the Green Party, and we dealt with the same thing from the mainstream publications. So I get why it’s frustrating, even while I agree that AlterNet isn’t the place for the kind of comments on this thread.

    You know, it goes with the territory in this country — we have a pretty narrow range of acceptable discourse and when you get too far out on the left or right flank you don’t really have a voice in the bigger venues.

    I’m happy that there are smaller, specialized sites oriented to more marginal ideologies, as long as they don’t encourage violence.

42. If anybody is curious, I am opposed to militarily fighting the US Government. But, I have no strong feelings about the ethnostate idea. I don’t even want to debate it.

43. The entire issue revolves around White communities, not just individuals. Even little pairings or small families are not enough, but rather whole communities so that Whites can live and grow and build and fulfill their potential. And not be compromised by the proven negative effects of diversity.

    How strange it is to live in a world where comprehensive research shows diversity is alienating and destructive to human happiness and then have it pushed anyway 24/7, especially on the one race that has been the most successful in human history. It’s as if this is done to specifically thwart White Europeans from realizing our potential. Just bizarre.

    I really don’t know how people handle the cognitive dissonance.

44. Joshua,

    The Whites I know want an ethnostate, they are just afraid to say it. It’s why America is such a mobile society. There’s a nationwide Jewish blockbusting scam going on.

    That’s why the powers love immigration so much. It forces us to move, which means we have to buy another house, get in more debt, et cetera. But that’s not going to last.

    Because of the contracting economy, White people are going to be stuck in one place. And then they will find they need to defend territory, both real estate and White women wombs. Because they are “stuck in one place,” they will form webs of long lasting relationships, which will become Tribes, like the tribes of the Middle Eastern deserts.

    We are learning semitic thinking, and that we need to develop an adaptation so semitics do not have such a verbal and thus social advantage over us. Semites are radicals, both Jews and Muslims. They radically criticize the Other, whether the goyim or the infidels. At the same time, they deny that they radically criticize the Other. The Jews in particular demand that the goyim be universalists, while they themselves practice no such thing.

    So the new Tribe of Whites needs to develop a semitic style critique of the Other, and that’s what we are doing. We need to demand and defend ideological or narrative territory, like the Jews maintain the Holocaust. We have to take and defend this territory as a Tribal Exercise, and force politicians to build museums and monuments to OUR particularisms, like the Jews forced the US government to build the Holoaust musuem.

    The Semitics use Mind-Weaponry. We Whites always relied on hot lead and cold steel, but now we have to fight the Mind-Weapon battlefield, for the first time in our long history (that we know of).

45. Joshua @ 141

    OK, I understand it’s nothing personal that we were banned.

    Thanks for saying that you are glad we have our right to have our own blog-space. I don’t care that I’m “marginal.” I see that changing real soon.

    We are White Nationalism 2.0. The older generation ranted about fantasy violence because they were very influenced by television. And the older generation never knew a time where problems weren’t solved easily by hot lead and cold steel.

    But now it’s a Mind-Weapon war. Even if we could get an army and inflict a lot of damage and casualties, it wouldn’t help our Cause. This is a Mind-Weapon war now, not a hot lead/cold steel war. Notice Iraq and Afghanistan aren’t flag waving democracies. The US military could not win the Mind-Weapon war in those places.

46. “I didn’t say demographics don’t matter at all. What I said was that the difference between an ethnic group being in the majority and being the largest of several minorities that still holds the most economic and political power is negligible. The difference between 50.1% and 49.9%.”

    So basically what he is saying, is that because there is little diference between 99.9 and 100.1 degrees, the frog should not mind being boiled atall.

47. Joshua,

    I am familiar with the basics of liberalism. Political science in college and some really fascinating people (much like yourself) that I’ve debated in my day.

    In my opinion, no people have a monopoly on vice or virtue. However, among the White peoples (and the other “Ice Peoples” – Japanese, Chinese, Korean) virtue is the norm and vice the exception. Among brown peoples, the opposite is true. I suspect that we’ll just have to agree to disagree on that one.

    My point is that inter-racial murder, non-lethal violence and transfer of wealth is disproportionately anti-White. Furthermore, the use of public assistance is predominantly anti-White. Add affirmative action and the dumbing down of promotion tests (fire fighters, police officers etc.) and you get a pretty ugly picture.

    Again: why should White Americans have to feel the impact of any of that for even one minute and why shouldn’t we demand separation?

48. “According to the US Census Bureau 2008:
    German Americans (16.5%), Irish Americans (11.9%), English Americans (9.0%), Italian Americans (5.8%), Polish Americans (3.3%), French Americans (3.1%), Scottish Americans (1.9%), Dutch Americans (1.6%), Norwegian Americans (1.5%), Swedish Americans (1.4%), Scotch-Irish Americans (1.2%), Russian Americans (1.0%), and Welsh Americans (0.7%) make up 58.9% of the White population.”

    That’s still 89.2% of the Non-Hispanic Whites in 2008, and it doesn’t even count Danes, Ukrainians, “Americans”, Swiss, Romanians (closer to Germans than Russians are), Hungarians, Icelanders, etc.

49. FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE had a word for all this anti-indoaryan garbage- and that word was Ressentiment (resentment).

    People who think/feel weak will try to drag anyone they think is strong/confident down into the cesspool so as to have some company!

50. “AlterNet is a relatively mainstream outlet.”

    So racist Jew bigots who hate white people and thrill at the idea of white people being displaced from our homelands is “mainstream” and ok with the Alternet policies, but white people who are pro-white and don’t want to be displaced are “out of the mainstream” and banned from Alternet?

    Who are the haters again?