From wire reports:
An unemployed military veteran has stunned South Carolina Democratic Party leaders by winning the nomination to challenge Republican U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint.
Thirty-two-year-old Alvin Greene of Manning defeated 64-year-old Vic Rawl of Charleston in Tuesday’s primary. Rawl is a former judge and legislator, who had about $186,000 cash available and had already scheduled a fundraising event for Thursday.
Greene raised no money in the contest, had no signs and no website.
Democratic Party Chairwoman Carol Fowler says she hasn’t seen Greene since he filed to run. She says Greene will be a much weaker candidate than Rawl going into November against tea party favorite DeMint.
She says people who didn’t know either candidate and voted alphabetically may help explain Greene’s win.
That’s right, an unemployed 32 year old who had no signs, no website, no money, and did absolutely nothing won a statewide race against a 64 year old former judge and legislator who actually raised money and campaigned. The ‘alphabet’ explanation sounds completely absurd. What could explain this?
Alvin Green is black. Vic Rawls is white. South Carolina Democratic Primary voters are majority black.
Paging Karl Rove and the other ‘conservatives’ placing their hopes on ‘hip-hop Republicans’: it won’t happen. If they’ll vote for a do-nothing black over an accomplished white liberal who actually tries to get their vote, they won’t ever vote for you. You better smell the coffee and start representing white interests.
I wonder what the League of the South boys are going to say about this one.
I think I might have a clue. Somehow non-Southerners will be held responsible for it all.
Green is also facing a felony charge for obscenity.
“Green is also facing a felony charge for obscenity.”
That will score him points and increase his chances.
Meanwhile, Conservatives, forever 47 steps behind, will be trying to “educate” the blacks and Liberals about how obscenity is very bad. They still haven’t figured out that Liberals and blacks LIKE obscenity.
Not to bring every discussion back to this, but this shows up why I don’t see the JFWE (Jew Free White Ethnostate) as being a workable goal. South Carolina has is 28% black. So you hvae 1.3 MILLION black people in the state, many with long history there. You are not going to be able to change laws to encourage them to migrate. Migrate to where? (In your plan several southern states are supposed to be doing this simultaneously.)
It might be a very idealized goal (say the points Hunter enumerated again in his CoCC essay), but it isn’t achievable in my opinion. Setting up mass movements to go after goals that people realize are not feasible results in small fractured groups of true-believers. (I was part of End the Fed groups two years ago. Fun, lots of like minded, probably not an achievable goal.)
I’m sorry I don’t have more answers. I’m not a negative person, but perhaps a “glass half empty” type. I think Matt’s formulation of his views as “a pro-white conservative” *IS* quite different from Hunter’s definition of White Nationalism as support for a JFWE.
I continue to question the wisdom of putting that out there as the goal / litmus test. Especially since when I asked questions about it the answers were all of the variety ‘well, they will leave on their own accord’. Why use the strongest possible language to describe some pretty moderate tactics?
HAC uses this language too, but consistently supports the tactics that make it possible. When I read a phrase like “Jew Free White Ethnostate” from him, and look up the details, he has strong plans to implement his vision. He has taken the step of choosing his location that is closest to being free of those who wishes to exclude. (Oregon has 3.8 million people and is 2% black meaning you have 75,000 people to convince to leave.)
And even then I think it’s unlikely, but it’s at least consistent and coherent and marginally possible.
If you take the core states of the Old Confederacy you have 10 million blacks! It would be one of the largest ethnic cleansings in history. I literally can’t imagine it.
I bet that the alphabet explanation holds some weight as well. People often vote by party but in a primary they might default to alphabetical. Sad state of affairs but encouraging for anybody named Aaron.
Can we bring back the literacy test for black voters yet?
Jackson: “If you take the core states of the Old Confederacy you have 10 million blacks! It would be one of the largest ethnic cleansings in history. I literally can’t imagine it.”
Very good point, Jackson. I agree it is very unlikely, and I am not going to get into the debate-of whether we should encourage a Black exodus or not.
But, playing Devil’s Advocate: Aren’t Whites being pushed out/ethnically cleansed out of California and South & Central Florida? [They are.]
Regarding ethnic cleansing in the last hundred years:
Germans forced from Eastern Europe after WW2.
Partition of the Raj into India and Pakistan.
Separation of Greeks and Turks on Cyprus.
Arabs driven from Palestine.
French expelled from Algeria.
Whites driven from Southern California.
All these cleansings are more or less treated as the ordinary workings of history, just the way things are. Whatever we do, if we make it stick, nobody that matters will care in 2050. As Joseph Sobran wrote, (more or less) “If the Germans had beat the Russians, President Clinton would be sitting at a table with Hitler’s heirs, drinking toasts and negotiating trade agreements”.
The liberals on the West Coast would love to take them.
Black militants advocate for separation, we could work something out with them.
Take the welfare we’re currently paying them and use that to help relocate them, done and done.
Mark gets it.
The old white strategy was to try to turn blacks white or segregate within the same society.
The new strategy should be to segregate within separate society and let blacks be blacks within their own borders.
All welfare payments for a decade used to fund the separation of the races.
All of Africa to the blacks.
Not to bring every discussion back to this, but this shows up why I don’t see the JFWE (Jew Free White Ethnostate) as being a workable goal.
Racial separation is necessary for racial preservation. To oppose separation is to oppose preservation.
It might be a very idealized goal (say the points Hunter enumerated again in his CoCC essay), but it isn’t achievable in my opinion.
If you think the preservation of your race is impossible and that being “realistic,” “respectable,” and “moderate” is what really matters, go join the Republican Party and work on electing great pro-white leaders like Piyush Jindal, Marco Rubio, Nikki Haley, Michael Steele, Anh Cao, and Sarah Palin.
I continue to question the wisdom of putting that out there as the goal / litmus test.
I question the knowledge and judgment of any supposedly pro-white person who does not support racial separation and ethnostates.
If you take the core states of the Old Confederacy you have 10 million blacks! It would be one of the largest ethnic cleansings in history. I literally can’t imagine it.”
It doesn’t have to involve “ethnic cleansing,” just a gradual, peaceful, and orderly repatriation of Blacks back to their ancestral continent of Africa from whence they were ripped by Jewish slave traders and their business partners a few centuries ago; I’ve laid out a tentative plan for Black repatriation @ http://whitesurvival.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/black-nationalism-the-most-humane-solution-to-the-african-issue-in-north-america/
And a similar solution to the Haitian problem too – http://whitesurvival.wordpress.com/2010/01/21/the-best-solution-to-the-current-haitian-crisis-millions-of-haitians-repatriated-back-to-africa/
The South Carolina Democratic Party is run by morons. In 2008, the Democratic candidate, Bob Conley, was staunchly anti-war, anti-neocon, anti-bailout, and anti-Patriot Act. But he was also a paleocon, so the state Democratic Party abandoned him.
While I am convinced that his candidacy is a GOP setup, I’m still fascinated to see where it will all end. 🙂
>>Jackson: the ethno-cleansing of the Volga Germans was bigger. So too (I imagine) was the ethnic cleansing of Hindus and other non-Muslims from Pakistan.
Well, gents, I think I have us a strategy on how to get elected: take an obscure person (and I have no idea how well-known any of you are in your communities) and use a deliberately poor campaign photo. Something like a crowd shot. Make sure there is a black guy in the foreground of the photo.
After that:
1) create a web site
2) run for office in a heavily black district.
3) Profit!!!
Good. I hope this is a precursor to all White liberals being denied or kicked out of any office where the constituents are majority minority.
Maybe this is the beginning of the end of the Democrat Party? Maybe the cracks in the rainbow coalition are turning into fissures. Certain factions in the party are turning on the zionists and the zionists are turning on them. White feminists are still sore over the Hillary Clinton campaign. Some blacks and Whites are turning on the hispanics and “comprehensive immigration reform” because of the loss of political power it means and the more cuts in their own piece of the pie. Everyone’s going tribal. It doesn’t look too good for the party if blacks decide to keep choosing their own in primaries because I seriously doubt most will get elected in the South and that will shut the Democrat Party out.
Green is also facing a felony charge for obscenity
That just gives him “street cred.”
Did you see his picture? The guy is friggin’ wall-eyed, and he looks like one of those sub-90 IQ, psychopathic blacks you’d see in a lineup.
Even stranger, who are the non-blacks that voted for him??
Isn’t this in a nutshell how this “Obama” character won the Democratic nomination? By winning Red States where other than a handful of queers and college professors, only blacks vote in the Democratic Primaries. Let’s see how well the liberal whites and Jews like their Frankenstein Monster they created of an Afro-Hispanic America when they can’t win any elections.
The biggest hurdle isn’t relocating people, logistically it’s not an issue, whether it’s tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions of non-Whites, it’s changing the minds of Whites to support such a measure.
Lordy, Lordy, what’s happening in the heart of old Dixie?
I’m far from there now (thank God), and I think this and the great increase in “anti-Islamist” Geert Wilders’ party in the Netherlands (just announced), show a two-fold plan by the Elites.
In USA & Europe massive alien immigration had begun to threaten formerly dominantly white cultures/societies.
Virtually no normal people wanted an invasion, and the POPULATION NEVER VOTED DIRECTLY FOR A RADICAL CHANGE, so it was pushed by schemers: Trotskyites.
[NB TROTSKY COINED “RACISM/RACIST” in his 1930 book History of the Russian Revolution, and pumped the term specificially against white awareness in a 1933 diatribe tract against German National Socialism. Repudite use of the term! It’s a toxic PROPAGANDA SLUR by an extremist to silence and crush our folks and culture. Nothing more!]
In Europe “they” made sure the major immigration wave was non-white and Islamic, knowing that by 2010 many white Christians would come to fear and attack this alien group (only natural!)… and Europeans would be primed to help a small Middle-Eastern nation fight Moslems, just about the time that its oil-rich neighbors got strong enough to pose a miltary threat (predictable, because in my high-school days long ago I mentioned such a coming conflict, but I didn’t take notice of immigration changes just then starting. I seem to remember getting an “A” on that. But now I think I only deserved a “B.” Clearly the plotters in Tel Aviv etc. also saw this and “solved” it.)
Basically, Europe has been set up with Moslems to drive a pro-Israeli movement to help that small nation widely disliked by its now powerful neighbors via oil wealth. And the “pro-white” and “right-wing” Wilders actually does the bidding of the Israeli state (whether or not he knows it, or even gets funded or medi-pushed by them. And European politics will soon be full of Wilders-types.)
The USA scenario is significantly different, and so is the goal of “them.” USA is a huge cash cow to fund Israeli state (and if you buck that, their media managers will make your political life hell!) In time Israel will switch to the European teat… while USA IMPLODES IN CIVIL WAR.
Hence we have a largely Latino invasion, vs blacks who need ever more entitlements, vs old whites, vs younger whites “educated” to elect a blatant alien-minded man to the White House (beyond issues of his “alien” status). In fact the 2008 election was a Trotsky-test of brainwashing and many Americans “passed” with flying colors!
War is very profitable for those who don’t fight in it and only loan money to parties that do, or plan to take look from a subjugatd territory. (As in 1st Civil War & the rape known as Reconstruction!)
But best of all from the view of Trotsky internationalists, is that massive (former white Christian bulwark) USA will finally be cracked and dismantled. This is REALLY REALLY CRUCIAL TO THEIR GLOBAL “DEMOCRACY” SYSTEM IN WHICH WE’RE A MINORITY TO BE RULED OVER – what is happening in S Africa now the separated white nation has been dismantled. White Christians starve and get routinely killed. //afrikaner-genocide-achives.blospot.com
Do I see any easy solution? No. But we are still a large majority inside USA, Canada, Australia, NZ, Britain, etc.
So if we feel the threat enough to reject usual politics, and DEMAND THAT WE RULE FOR OUR FOLK-NATION… there is really little they can do to overturn our irate masses, especially if you:
#1. Repudiate the term “racist” as a Trotsky lie to kill us.
#2. Repudiate democracy and “changeling” laws we have gotten that gradually enslave and disempower us. Demand return to our original law.* For a start, demand repeal of all federal laws made since 1910. Yes! Undo a whole century of deviation! Back in 1910 we had basic laws against theft, murder, rape, etc. It’s all we need!
We used mostly silver money…. use it again. (Gold is problematic: banksters own far too much! It’s too costly for most daily trades. In 1910 a farmer making a silver dollar a day was living OK. Spend your 100 cents wisely!)
#3. Repudiate paper money and all such debt. (All such savings will also vanish! So get realcash now!) This is much better than trying to audit the Federal Reserve!
#4. Demand a restoration of racial-national identity. This is the opposite of the secular mixed “country” system we now drifted into (under evil guidance) where anyone can become a secular “citizen.” Repudiate such “citizenship.” Let the country be ruled only by NATIONALS.
#5. Repudiate Abe Lincoln (a proto-Trotsky!) and his now uncritically accepted “Emancipation Proclamation” (and later Federal Laws related.) Repudiate it September 22 each year (when Lincoln first announced it) because….
Our original Original Law was not a Consitution that allowed men to make any laws. It was the Bible! (Bible Law actually allowed slave ownership. But much more that that must be relearned!) Christians, focus on that!
I don’t think South Carolina “Christian Separatists” (or whatever they call themselves now) actually understand what a “radical” thing is required in an actual 1st Century minded Christian Society, but I’m willing to give it a try.
WHERE?
I see some say S Carolina has too many blacks to make it practical to get them to move, to set up some sort of Christian/white/non-Jew “alternate nation”… not to mention the US Federal Regime of Obamaniacs will do what Lincoln did when S Carolina “revolted” long ago! (Aren’t we supposed to learn from history, not repeat it?)
Others suggest a far whiter area, like Oregon – full of white folks… feeling safe… with massively brainwashed youths. I remember how leaders in a small Oregon town publicly folded when some “racist” group considered buying a patch of land. (I don’t remember details now.)
*************************
How about this? About three million Afrikaners are under genocidal attack by local blacks… and several millions of Zimbabweans (mostly black) are now in S Africa because they totally looted and destroyed their own country now run by a virtual gangster and his crew.
Why not repudiate Trotskyite Zimbabwe itself?
Why notepudiate every living soul in that region?
Tell them to get out – unless they want to live THERE (not in Britain) under our folks via Bible Law – in which case flee to named border points by a certain date. (Not to points on the s Africa border!)
Then… begin in earnest to reclaim some of our lost soil (for what has been taken by slow invasion and “politics”) for a whole new “Trans-Limpopo” regime of Bible Law under our rule. Look at it like Noah and the Flood. Tell them to get on the ark… or get “drowned.” [Note that Noah had zero converts outside his own family!]
Now I don’t know exactly what “deluge” might occur, but someone surely has some ideas. (Be creative!) {I do know that once you have a region reclaimed, you can start reclaiming another one. The prisoners from #2 can be held in #1. And so on and so on.}
This should NOT be like the stupid wars US has fought in past decades where our federally-financed soldiers try (in very alien environments) to know who is “friend” vs who is “foe” in a Third-World Hell-Hole. (That was crap!) In this case, locals who don’t move to rescue points will by definition be enemies: people to remove. Our goal is to acquire that terrain, not “fix” a broken regime or impose democracy. Our folks who do work to acquire the land, will OWN the land, in proportion to their achievement. Isn’t that fair?
There are said to be about a million homeless drfiting Afrikaners now, so some of them might be gainfully empoyed in bringing about the transition…. together with folks who lost “colonial” homes in Rhodeia, plus born-again (Confederate?) Christian Bible-Law types.
Oh, yeah, before all this you had better also…
#6. Repudiate the UN as another neo-Trotskyite gang that never acts to defend us! (Or they would have already heard the Boerevolk demanding to get back the republics land THEY HAD PURCHASED and lost to the Brits… and after reagaining power, they lost it to the Marxist ANC! See their “Majuba Declaration” virtually ignored by mainstream media, the ANC, and the UN.)
Now this sort of plan may sound “extreme,” but the almost totaly destruction of Rhodesia (what was flourishing despite sanctions when I had seen it in 1970s) was downright extreme! – and predicted!!!
What are the talking-heads going to whine about? The death of democracy in Zimbabwe? Crash of its economy? All that has already happened! (by design)
And indeed, recolonization of parts of Africa has been already sugggested by others! (Check a Rense page.) Sierra Leone recently had folks asking to be recolonized by Britain! (Just wanting to immigrate to Britain?)
Maybe this is part of the Insider’s RIAA/CFR Conspiracy?
I don’t know. (I’m not welcome at Rhodes University anymore. Look at their anthropology page for madness now passing for political science there!)
But if it is part of their globalization scheme, crush that by excluding foreign bank and corporate ownership!!!
Trans-Limpopo must be very selective who gets into the nation as a NATIONAL (as opposed to being a native resident who complies with our system.)
Only let our folks who found the new THEOCRACY (not democracy) own what is inside it. Such a Trans-Limpopo nations would be anethema to the Trotskyites and UN and RIAA/CFT-Trilateral-Bilderbergers and Israeli-Zionist organizers of world events.
Comments welcome. I don’t pretend to have all the answers! But I’m trying to be creative.
The rise of an “unknown” shows how weird representative government has become. (And these folks make laws! A new reason to disrespect such “law” and “authority.”)
What is occurring is the racialization of the US political process, at least on the part of blacks. When the white become equally racial… oh, they’re a majority overall!
I will try to address the comments made in response to my original one:
Steve in the Swamps wrote: But, playing Devil’s Advocate: Aren’t Whites being pushed out/ethnically cleansed out of California and South & Central Florida? [They are.]
Yes, they are. Which should show us a few things. There is a lot of ethnic cleansing succeeding without any force of law or even explicit organization behind it. How is this ething cleansing being accomplished? Immigration, migration, breeding and shunning (that is the new latino groups making out-group people uncomfortable).
We can, and should, adopt all these tactics too, for ourselves, now. Because they work, and because they don’t require fantastic changes to accomplish. A return to old-time racism is a start. Before a white ethno-state we certainly must have white neighborhoods, towns, suburbs. A return to sundown laws (informal) is probably feasible in many areas.
We need to get better at asserting ourselves. “I’m sorry I don’t understand your broken English, please come back with a relative who speaks English later — next”… Again the Latino’s are great at this kind of intimidation and low level hassling.
Discard wrote, quoting Sobran: “If the Germans had beat the Russians, President Clinton would be sitting at a table with Hitler’s heirs, drinking toasts and negotiating trade agreements”.
True. On the other hand the world seems to have taken more of a dislike to these things since 1945. The entire Palestinian problem is based on the world now allowing the ethnic cleansing of the Pali’s from Israel to be marked as “feat accomplished”. Clinton went to war to (supposedly) stop Serbian ethnic cleansing in Bosnia.
So I think it would be a huge issue, if it is called out explicitly. Vs. a non-issue if it is accomplished covertly and implicitly, as the mexis are successfully doing in much of the country.
MGLS wrote: Racial separation is necessary for racial preservation. To oppose separation is to oppose preservation.
True. There are many different ways both individually and collectivley to achieve seperation. I grew up in Metro Detroit. I lived in a beautiful suburb with zero black inhabitants, zero blacks in my elementary school, almost zero in the public highschool.
MGLS continued: If you think the preservation of your race is impossible and that being “realistic,” “respectable,” and “moderate” is what really matters, go join the Republican Party and work on electing great pro-white leaders like Piyush Jindal, Marco Rubio, Nikki Haley, Michael Steele, Anh Cao, and Sarah Palin.
I didn’t use the terms respectable and moderate. I did use the term realistic. I want to see change in my life, not just post wild-ass rhetoric on the web. I have taken action to make positive change happen, and will take more. I don’t see what action would encourage 10 or 20 million negros to leave the part of the world that they have been living in for 400 years and go back to Africa. I don’t see what part of Africa would have them.
My sense is if we set that as a goal we will achieve nothing, and therefore have no separation.
The Republican Party does make for a fun target for barbs, but on the other hand if we are to harness the political process at all it’s probably still our most useful vehicle. I suspect the Tea Party will have some positive effects and (at the very least) slow down our dispossession.
Can we say the same about anything the White Nationalist movement has done in the last 40 years? No. In fact I would argue that many misguided endeavors have actually played into the hands of our enemies and strengthened their power and hastened our own demise.
MGLS goes on: I question the knowledge and judgment of any supposedly pro-white person who does not support racial separation and ethnostates.
There are many ways to get to these goals. Separation (at a meaningful level) can be achieved without an ethnostate.
Hunter’s Neo-Confederacy (at least the full blown deal) reminds me of the science fiction novels Libertarians write. Perfection of an idealized society is easily imagined, but there is really no road map to get there.
The South still seems the least likely place for an ethnostate because it has the most blacks!! (Duh).
Hell, if Oregon wanted to get rid of the 75,000 blacks in the state they could offer them each $100,000 to move. That would cost $7.5 billion, out of a $51 billion dollar budget. That’s not going to be possible with 1.3 million blacks in South Carolina.
Hopefully we can disagree about tactics (and even some goals) without disparaging each others pro-white bona fides.
White Preservationist: I do think that WN’s covertly supporting Pan-Africanist movements makes sense. It would be wonderful if it happened, but I seriously doubt it. The average American Negro, despite all the whining, has it 100X better than the average African.
Finally Mark made a great comment I agree with, not in response to anything I said. Let me restate it: Mark says:
June 10, 2010 at 7:00 pm
The biggest hurdle isn’t relocating people, logistically it’s not an issue, whether it’s tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions of non-Whites, it’s changing the minds of Whites to support such a measure.
I agree with this.
I think OD is a great resource to make that happen. I think it’s effectiveness is reduced by having a poorly explained, extremely provocative, highly unrealistic goals on the masthead. Whereas “Western Racial and Cultural Preservation” is none of those, and superior from a tactical point of view.
I would love a PREVIEW function here. I missed a /i tag. Hard to catch w/o preview.
Good post, H. Rock White.
@Jackson
I fixed some of your tags.
Hell, if Oregon wanted to get rid of the 75,000 blacks in the state they could offer them each $100,000 to move. That would cost $7.5 billion, out of a $51 billion dollar budget. That’s not going to be possible with 1.3 million blacks in South Carolina.
Yes and Oregon would be left with 380,000 latinos and 100,000 orientals. Ending affirmative action and the baby factory welfare state would go a long way to meeting our goals. If employment prospects dry up that only leaves welfare. Make sterilization mandatory to receive goverment assistance and the problem will take care of itself in a generation. Most black women wouldn’t even care. They only have more children because it means more money.
@Daley:
Ending affirmative action and the baby factory welfare state would go a long way to meeting our goals. If employment prospects dry up that only leaves welfare. Make sterilization mandatory to receive goverment assistance and the problem will take care of itself in a generation.
Exactly. Lets get started on trying to implement this somewhere! Affirmative Action was done away with, at least in some cases, theoretically, in California, Washington and elsewhere. We should put more effort into enforcing the provisions of those citizen initatives.
Ending Welfare is a wonderful idea, particularly as states go into deep deficit shock. Even liberal govs like Patterson in NY are having to admit they just can’t afford to keep the dole going for those millions of useless eaters! Perfect.
*I* would be very very happy with a sterilization requirement but think it’s politically unlikely. I think some states do more or less force them onto birth control appropriate for them (patches, shots, stuff they can’t forget).
Hell, if Oregon wanted to get rid of the 75,000 blacks in the state they could offer them each $100,000 to move. That would cost $7.5 billion, out of a $51 billion dollar budget. That’s not going to be possible with 1.3 million blacks in South Carolina.
It would be money well spent. Why would we not sacrifice financially and otherwise in order to build a better future for our descendants?
I don’t see what action would encourage 10 or 20 million negros to leave the part of the world that they have been living in for 400 years and go back to Africa. I don’t see what part of Africa would have them.
My sense is if we set that as a goal we will achieve nothing, and therefore have no separation.
You are ignoring a much likelier possibility: the partition of the United States into ethnostates.
Richard McCulloch has outlined a possible partition:
http://www.racialcompact.com/partitionmap.html
I suspect the Tea Party will have some positive effects and (at the very least) slow down our dispossession.
What good does it ultimately do to slow down our dispossession by a few years? Even if the Tea Party types achieved a total victory and got everything they wanted, our dispossession would still be assured. The goal is to prevent our dispossession, not slow it down.
Can we say the same about anything the White Nationalist movement has done in the last 40 years? No.
The white nationalist movement over the last few decades definitely left much to be desired, to say the least. However, what have the conservative movement and Republicans accomplished? Nothing.
Wilmot Robertson wrote in The Dispossessed Majority:
Wilmot Robertson wrote in The Ethnostate: “A more effective and enduring way to life spirits might go like this: I’m right, so I will go ahead, come what may. If no one listens, so what? I would do what I’m doing even if I knew that my people were finished and didn’t have a chance of a comeback. Yes, my ship of state, my West, may be going down, but if she does, I’m going to make sure that at least one member of the crew is still hoisting sail as she sinks. Say to yourself, if you must, that you are a prisoner of destiny, that you have little or no choice. But also say that since you are locked into the struggle, you may as well make the best of it.”
Jared Taylor wrote in reply to Steve Sailer: “Whites have a duty to their ancestors and an obligation to their children. Duty does not calculate the chances of success, as Mr. Sailer would have us do. Duty calls us to what is right.”
If people vote alphabetically, maybe I ought to change my name to Aabramowitz or Aaronson, but not Zuckerman or Zimmerman.
If people vote racially, I suppose I could paint myself Black. I could change my name to Al Jolson.
When i need to recruit some dumb asses, I be back to this site
dumbasses