Senator Jim Webb pens a historic article in the Wall Street Journal
Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege
America still owes a debt to its black citizens, but government programs to help all ‘people of color’ are unfair. They should end.
Paul Craig Roberts made this point several years ago — why should someone who immigrated to the US like, yesterday, be eligible for “affirmative action” today?
What needs to be understood about this, though, is that ANY chinking on the Berlin Wall of Multiculturalism will (rightly) be considered an ATTACK on the whole structure.
This is because Multiculturalism/Diversity is a monolith that demands Whites NEVER object to ANY aspect. We are supposed to keep our eyes downcast, mouths shut, wallets open. Preferably on our knees, begging forgiveness, but that is of course is only required if you want to have a career in academia or government service, maintaining the monolith against millions of other Whites.
Having Occidental Dissent writers chinking that wall is one thing; a sitting Senator is quite another. Senator Jim Webb wrote a book, “Born Fighting” about the Scots-Irish. I hope he’s ready to live up to his ideals at this moment. I think he probably knows he’s kicking a hornets nest with this article. This isn’t a foot-in-mouth gaffe; this is a shot fired.
Pat Buchanan, who definitely knows what he’s doing, is chinking at the Berlin Wall of Multiculturalism too:
The White House fears it is losing white America because of a false perception that it harbors a bias against white America.
Outrageous, rail those journalists who celebrated the NAACP’s accusation that the tea party is harboring racists and is too cowardly to confront them.
Yet, as things perceived as real are real in their consequences, if the White House does not eradicate this perception, its lease may not be renewed. Whence comes that perception? Several incidents.
First was the startling accusation by Attorney General Eric Holder, days after Barack Obama was inaugurated in a gusher of good feeling, that we are all “a nation of cowards” when it comes to facing issues of race.
A real icebreaker for a national conversation.
Second was the instantaneous verdict of the president, when asked about the arrest of Harvard’s Henry Louis Gates by Cambridge cop Sgt. James Crowley. With no knowledge of what happened, Obama blurted out that the cops had “acted stupidly.”
It took a White House beer summit to detoxify that one.
A third was the revelation that Obama’s first Supreme Court nominee, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, the “wise Latina” herself, had gone to extremes to see that the case of Frank Ricci and the New Haven, Conn., firefighters never got to the Supreme Court. Ricci and co-defendants had been denied promotions they had won in competitive exams solely because they were white and no black firemen had done as well.
The fourth was the Justice Department’s dropping of charges against members of the New Black Panther Party, whose intimidation of voters in Philadelphia had been captured on tape.
When a department official resigned in protest and went to the Civil Rights Commission to accuse officials at Justice of ordering staff attorneys not to pursue such cases, that explosive charge, too, was ignored by Justice.
Came then the NAACP smear that the tea party was harboring racists, which Joe Biden explicitly rejected on national television on Sunday, before the Monday firestorm over Sherrod.
Now, whatever one’s views on each of these episodes in which race played a role, white Americans are being forced to address them. And, surely, the White House understands this is bad news for Obama and the Democratic Party.
For though the black community remains solidly behind Obama and the white majority is shrinking toward minority status by 2042 or 2050, depending on which Census survey one uses, whites in America still outnumber blacks five to one. And if forced constantly to come down on one side or the other of a racial divide, most folks will wind up with their own.
In past elections, Democrats have raised race—allegations that black churches were being torched in the South, that George W. Bush’s opposition to a hate crimes bill meant he was coldly indifferent to the dragging death of a handicapped black man—to solidify and energize the minority vote. And, today, that vote remains solid behind Obama,
Where the erosion is taking place is in white America, among working- and middle-class folks who voted for Hillary Clinton in the primaries but took a chance with Obama in the fall. Now, every time some new incident erupts, these folks are being tarred.
Opposition to affirmative action is racist. Supporting the tea party gives aid and comfort to racists. Opposing health care puts you in league with folks who used racial slurs on Rep. John Lewis. To raise the issue of the New Black Panther Party is to play the race card.
One understand the bitterness of tea party folks who carry signs that read: “What difference does it make what this placard says. You’ll call it racist anyway.”
As the National Journal’s Ron Brownstein has been reporting, white America is increasingly alienated and distrustful of all our major economic and political power centers—the banks, big corporations, the government.
And, for the first time in our lifetimes, outside the South, white racial consciousness has visibly begun to rise.
COPYRIGHT CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
LOL! And they said that only great minds think alike!
Paul Craig Roberts made this point several years ago — why should someone who immigrated to the US like, yesterday, be eligible for “affirmative action” today?
Is there anyone left who has not been exposed to the idea that white people are the most bigoted racist people on planet Earth?
Therefore anyone settling in a white country has agreed to, in effect, a contract that waives any appeal to suffering from racism.
You dont agree to rent on the 100th floor of a building and the sue the landlord because you suffer from vertigo.
In fact the US should conduct a marketing campaign around the world pointing out the horrible natutre of white racist society. That might stop some immigrants and stop the rest from complaining about racism and from benefiting from AA.
The Reds are in big trouble once Whites can talk about race quotas without being punished. Immigration is inescapably tied to race, for example. All topics can be brought to the table, Dark criminality, Dark innate dull-wittedness and the destruction of our schools, Dark breeding habits and the displacement of Whites, Dark consumption of White resources and the drain on our economy. And once the Darks are open for criticism, we can also talk about their allies and enablers, the elites in general and Jews in particular. Nor can the Hindus and Orientals escape scrutiny, once the Jews are on the table. From esophagus to anus, the whole multi-cult is connected. The Regime will be out to silence this fellow faster than a Mel Gibson. I don’t trust him and I suspect he’s only out to succeed BHO, but I hope he keeps making noise.
Reds? Rothschild = Red Shield. Bankers leading revolt of the downtrodden, against exploitation by same wankers. (Wank is british slang for masturbate)
TabuLaRaza: I use the terms Reds, Regime, Powers That Be, Our Masters, and some others interchangeably to refer to the individuals and institutions that own the politicians.
I know that, I was delving into origins of the term.
“The red shield of Rothschild and the red flag of communism are not only the same colour, but are one essence, and the colour is the colour of blood. How can it profit the Jewish capitalists to have revolution? The fact remains that it does.” and on pp. 33–34 she quotes:..”there has been for centuries a hidden conspiracy, chiefly Jewish, whose objects are to produce revolution, Communism, Anarchy by means of which they hope to arrive at the hegemony of the world by establishing some sort of despotic rule.”
http://euro-med.dk/?p=13810
I enjoyed the various uses of “chink” in this post. Its meaning was unambiguous to me in reference to Mr. Web’s female companion, but initially confused me when encountered in reference to the Berlin Wall of Multi-culturalism.
I have always thought of “chinking” as a method for reinforcing, rather than weakening, walls.
What can I say? I’m Scots-Irish.
“I have always thought of “chinking” as a method for reinforcing, rather than weakening, walls.”
Chink means opening or crack.
“Chink means opening or crack.”
I hope you’re not referring to his wife?
He obviously thinks she’s chinkable.
2. chink – fill the chinks of, as with caulking
plug, stop up, secure – fill or close tightly with or as if with a plug; “plug the hole”; “stop up the leak”
Sorry for the digression, above. The plugging/unplugging of holes is analogous to the “finger in the dike” (not the one on the Supreme Court).
It doesn’t matter what Webb’s private ambitions are, if he creates enough agitation to start even a slow drip, it could mark the beginning of a flood.
“finger in the dike”
eeeeewwwhh!!!!! you nasty!
2. chink – fill the chinks of, as with caulking
plug, stop up, secure – fill or close tightly with or as if with a plug; “plug the hole”; “stop up the leak”
Verb derived from the noun. If there’s no chink to chink, you can’t chink.
Is it a coincidence that the only group Webb excused from giving up some of their ill-gotten diversity goodies to qualified, bypassed Whites is also the only group with a decades-long and recent history of massive street protests and occasional riots in the name of racial entitlements?
Oops, I misused the term “chinking of the wall.” I meant to say, knocking off a little piece of it here or there, NOT reinforcing it! Anybody got a better verb? I’ll edit it in.
“chipping away at”
“Is it a coincidence that the only group Webb excused from giving up some of their ill-gotten diversity goodies to qualified, bypassed Whites is also the only group with a decades-long and recent history of massive street protests and occasional riots in the name of racial entitlements?”
Of course it wasn’t a coincidence. But just because he’s not willing to commit political suicide for Euro-Americans doesn’t mean he isn’t capable of opening up a chink, (no offense intended to Mrs. Webb).
Of course it wasn’t a coincidence.
Yes, we all know what Mao said about power.
Whites don’t riot, they form armies and conquer or destroy. The easy life of unfettered access to food and entertainment spoiled the Baby Boomer boobs and let them have the luxury of caring about hostile aliens. However Generation X and the millenials have met the enemy and they are not us, and never will be either. This whole scam is about to crumble as those aging hippies die off and the cold hard reality of “We Don’t Care!” hits ape city and the dumb brown filth that will sink and slink into obscurity soon. Let these fools try to fight when Armies form to oppose them. Uncle Sham is broke and the power of the purse is the only thing this bitch had in his magic foolbox. That Race War they always wanted isn’t going to be the glorious victory they were falsely conned into believing.