White Hispanic Sanchez vs Northeast Media Elitist Jew “Stewart”
We at the new, cleaned up “mainstream” O.D. do not promote obsessions with THE JEWS, nor do we blame THE JEWS for all the problems White Americans face. Not all Jews are evil, many Jewish people are regular, decent folks. That said, we will present articles that shed light on Jewish issues that effect the legitimate rights of our people to live and prosper in our country.
While Jews do not control all of the US media – Jews are over represented in the US media elite – the MSM; most of the media elite is very hostile to White Indo European Americans.
Today there is an interesting story of a White Hispanic – CNN’s Rick Sanchez that got on the wrong side of the Jewish media elite and he lost his job. He was fired for saying Comedy Central host John Stewart (a Jew with anglicized name) was an elitist, often bigoted against anyone who wasn’t like him. If you listen to the interview, it sounds like Rick Sanchez is trying to play the role of the marginalized “Hispanic” – who is looked down upon by elite Americans. Sanchez doesn’t push the (truth) that Jews control the media, instead he sounds like he is arguing that John Stewart had an easy, rich upbringing and never had to work hard or face discrimination, like Sanchez’s Hispanic immigrant father. The other person in the interview traps Sanchez and says that Stewart is Jewish and puts Sanchez in the hot seat by asking him words to the effect: “are you saying that Jews have never been oppressed”. Sanchez just doesn’t handle this trap well at all, he comes back with words to the effect that “of course Jews have been oppressed in the past, but now they are doing so well, as a lot of the big shots at CNN are Jewish”.
And as most folks in the know understand – in America you can not say or imply that Jews control the media or you will lose your job, face social shunning. Some Jewish people are allowed to brag, that yes Jews control Hollywood, dominate the media because Jews are supposedly so talented, so smart – but no one else is allowed to mention the truth of Jewish media control.
Re: Rupert Klemens,
“Laugh out loud, regular Jews are the ones who fund (through donations) the ADL and SPLC.”
I’m fairly certain that most Jews do not donate to those organizations. Many rich/powerful ones do – and those are the ones who are the problem.
“The reality of the matter is ALL JEWS are a problem and something like Byzantiums anti-Judaic Codes are going to be needed to get them back in line. ”
If you say (about a race or ethnicity) “all”, “every” or “none” this usually means your beliefs have left the bounds of rational and transformed themselves into an obsession or creed. Do you personally know every Jew that you can make a comment like this? It’s blanket statements like yours that give organizations such as the ADL and the SPLC ammunition to continue what they do. You are supporting them far more than any monetary donation.
Jackson says:
“I am trying to understand your opinions. Some “regular Jewish folks” are OK, as long as they are not part of the Jewish elite that is destroying our culture. Are there not also Blacks, Mexicans, Thais and Indians who are just “regular folks” who fit in and are not a threat. Why not extend our best wishes to them too? If you and Hunter are traveling the same path to the kinder, gentler White Nationalism I think you may have many contradictions in your new philosophy that you should clarify for us. Your comments above seem to highlight them.”
OK, I will try to clarify some things. I don’t speak for Hunter, please read his very honest posts why he is going “mainstream” and getting away/out of a very negative 24/7 WN cult.
My position is that White Americans need to be positive, intelligent and start to love our own people, to help our own people – and stop blaming others for our failures, disappointments in life. If we can’t get White Americans to care about each other and come together to help each other, it’s a huge waste of time to be ranting and raving about THE JEWS or Non Whites.
Yes, of course there are many powerful Jewish people, Jewish organizations that are strongly anti White, who are pushing terrible political, economic and cultural programs against us and against the world. These bad individual Jewish people and Jewish organizations should be identified and opposed – but only in effective ways that work!
Running around ranting and raving about how you/we HATE ALL JEWS, HATE ALL N$*#&*@, HATE ALL NWS – this doesn’t work.
Aryan means “noble” – I suggest Whites here and other places strive to behave in honorable, noble ways towards other Whites and to NWs, Jews, Muslims etc.
Please read the posts/articles I published here on O.D. that address the Jewish problems in intelligent ways.
Ted Turner – Our Media Great White Hope Blows It
Jewish Media Power Gets CNN White Hispanic Sanchez Fired
Spanish History Lesson: When Jews Took the Arab Muslim Side Against White Europeans
Becoming educated on the real Jewish situation and learning from successes (Spain 1492) and failures in the past will help us win real victories in the here and now.
And to answer your question. Yes, I do believe that there are lots of individual Jewish people who are basically decent folks, not involved in sinister conspiracies to destroy our civilization.
Jews are collectivists; Europeans are individualists.
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Individualism-Collectivism.html
If you and Hunter are traveling the same path to the kinder, gentler White Nationalism I think you may have many contradictions in your new philosophy that you should clarify for us. Your comments above seem to highlight them.
Jackson I think I can help you there with a quote from Jack Ryan on the “Midwestern Meltdown” article. I was asking him which brand of GOPism he was pushing on this site, neconservatism or paleoconservatism. His response was neither A nor B but option C.
Alex says:
September 28, 2010 at 10:25 pm
What does option “c” believe in?
Option “C” is to take the White side.
No wars against White nations.
Pro White immigration policies.
Live and let live with the best of the NWs – but, yes – we are White.
14 Words
It sounds like some kind multiculturalism and multiracialism with a thin pro-White veneer to it.
Alex
Please read the Comment Guidelines – with the prohibition against flaming. Try to READ this post which discusses the reality of Jewish media power in a factual way. If you are going to make comments on the post
– “Jewish Media Power Gets CNN White Hispanic Sanchez Fired”
try to refer to something in the article/post in question. It’s also in the Comment Guidelines not to write lots Off-Topic Comments and spread gossip and call O.D. writers names.
There are lots of other places on the Net that do not have many/any Comment Guidelines – if you feel you can’t abide by the new guidelines at O.D. feel free to post this stuff elsewhere.
I looked up the word flaming and it means angry emails and rude comments. My post contains nothing of the sort and my response is perfectly in line with some of the questions people on here are posing about your philosophy. Perhaps the Comment Guidelines should contain something about no paraphrasing?
Alex – please just try to step back a bit and make some small efforts to embrace the new and improved O.D. comments guidelines. It’s not severe censorship – just some common sense guidelines to make the comments section more positive; have the comments refer to the good articles posted on O.D.
This post/thread was about a White Hispanic Rick Sanchez getting taken down by the Jewish media power elite. It’s an interesting subject, one not covered in mainstream conservative, neo conservative web sites, blogs, magazines etc.
Again, try to be a bit more positive and work with the new guidelines to make the comments section a positive part of O.D.
Jack Ryan:
The goal you speak of for the new OD is noble: Making the message more palatable, breaking out of the echo-chorus ghetto of the same old people saying the same old things, with some trolls sprinkled in.
I cautiously support a “mainstream OD”, if done right. I’m sure glad it’s not me in your shoes trying to get that done.
It’s clear a lot of people feel OD is de-racializing itself, rather than mainstreamizing itself. (Are those the same?). I share their concern.
Alex wrote:
I looked up the word flaming
Too bad the OD comment section is all-serious now: making a wisecrack to that quoted text is easy-pickings. ;-D
[@Moderator, You can delete this if you want]
While the subject has come up could you explain that bold text quote you made that Alex refers to?
Wanderer says:
October 3, 2010 at 7:12 pm
“Jack Ryan:
The goal you speak of for the new OD is noble: Making the message more palatable, breaking out of the echo-chorus ghetto of the same old people saying the same old things, with some trolls sprinkled in.
I cautiously support a “mainstream OD”, if done right. I’m sure glad it’s not me in your shoes trying to get that done.
It’s clear a lot of people feel OD is de-racializing itself, rather than mainstreamizing itself. (Are those the same?). I share their concern.”
JR replies:
Fair enough, I can understand these concerns. But it isn’t the case that I or Hunter are selling out to Neo Cons, the Beltway GOP establishment, embracing race mixing, wars for Israel etc.
Just check out my posts like the- Instauration article defending the Spanish Inquisition expelling the Jews from Spain in 1492. Taking a pro White Spanish, pro Spanish Inquisition position against the Jews in Spain – that’s not something that could in any way be considered “Neo Conservative”, pro race mixing, selling out to the Jews. I bet even the one fair minded Jewish person who posted on O.D. in the last day isn’t going to be very happy with me for defending the Spanish Inquisition.
🙂
But tough. I’m pro White. Our White side won in Spain in 1492 and I think that’s great.
The other posts/articles I’ve published have presented intelligent analysis of real problems of Jewish domination of the US media, not conspiracy mongering kook stuff. My post are pro White and reflect years of successful activism in American politics and culture. Yes, I have been on the winning side of many elections, political battles with strong racial themes like immigration, crime, A.A. etc.
And my other posts are just positive posts about positive White folks who are good at things – Pop Musicians ABBA and George Strait, some White Gospel singers and one post about working with nice White Mormons/Latter Day Saints. All of my posts are pro White, and introduce subjects that mainstream Whites might like – White folks do not want to drop out of society to embrace a 24/7 WN cult of doom and despair.
But the main changes I and Hunter have made aren’t really ideological changes, they’re just efforts to clean up O.D. – to improve the atmosphere improve manners. The comment section had fallen down too often in to negative ad hominem attacks on Hunter and O.D. writers – lots of gossip, character assassinations, flame wars; the O.D. comment section was getting to be like a dive bar where folks were getting drunk, acting abusive and picking fights just to pick fights. I wanted to clean things up and hopefully new customers.
We want O.D. to be a positive White place – where we love our people and are tough but fair to others.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how we can make O.D. more positive, reach a wider more mainstream readership, without compromising our core positions?
I agree with Jack Ryan.
I admit, I sometimes am also susceptible to this gloom and doom rhetoric. But I do indeed believe that white nationalists/advocates need to start sounding more cheerful, positive, and optimistic about the future.
Alex Kurtagic’s article “Learning From the Right” should be required reading for any white activist.
True, we certainly should point out Jewish influence, the problems with non-whites, etc, but we need to change our tone. All this nostalgia for “the good ol’ days” and dread about the future is negative. As Kurtagic points out, these are the characteristics of old, dying types.
Forget about the “good ol’ days.”
Let’s create BETTER DAYS for the future!
Therefore, I recommend that Occidental Dissent start writing about great white men of history and celebrating the achievements of whites. This will allow us to know our real history, and also let us know that yes, we can indeed become great again.
Of course, don’t forget about great white women as well. Didn’t mean to leave the ladies out!
All white people, regardless of gender, income, sexual orientation, political affiliation, etc, are in this together. When the average non-white sees us, we’re simply white, so we have to start uniting and working together.
RE Dean:
While the subject has come up could you explain that bold text quote you made that Alex refers to?
I’ll show you–
This text is in bold
This text is in italics.
This is a link
Look here for how I did it:
http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/2364/tagsoccidental.png
Jack, I’m still waiting.
Dean while you are waiting, why not try to learn something new, learn some important history of our Spanish kinsmen’s heroic struggles to re-conquer Spain? This history story has a happy ending – our side won as our side won in the Spanish Civil War in the 1930s.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/08/26/spanish-history-lesson-when-jews-took-the-arab-muslim-side-against-white-europeans/
There is great knowledge here on O.D. People need to push aside negative energy and seek positive knowledge.
Are you saying you won’t clarify your comments?
Political Pessimist says:
“I do indeed believe that white nationalists/advocates need to start sounding more cheerful, positive, and optimistic about the future…
we certainly should point out Jewish influence, the problems with non-whites, etc, but we need to change our tone. All this nostalgia for “the good ol’ days” and dread about the future is negative. As Kurtagic points out, these are the characteristics of old, dying types.
Forget about the “good ol’ days.”
Let’s create BETTER DAYS for the future!”
J.R replies:
Excellent comment P.P.!
The recent past wasn’t a golden age for most of us. I was 8 years old in Chicago when the 68 Chicago Dem convention came to town and it was civil war, anarchy – Black rioting and looting was going down. I was being force fed marxist indoctrination that the likes of Abbie Hoffman, Jane Fonda were great fighters for freedom. Then the 70s came around and all us children, early teens were forced to watch “Roots” on TV and then go to school and discuss how evil White people were for enslaving Blacks, plus all the horrible Norman Lear TV shows like Mary Hartman Mary Hartman. ZOG media control/propaganda was much worse in the early 70s than now. Plus the Cold War is now over, so we don’t have to hear all the dumb goyim Conservatives getting all excited to “Nuke the Russians” during the Reagan years.
I was with some 60 ish lawyer in poor shape the other week that was trying to get me to play “White Rabbit” by Jefferson Airplane on the Jukebox to introduce 20 something (great looking) bar tender to the supposedly “great music and great times” of the 1960s drug culture. I didn’t go for that.
So from my perspective, I’m not all nostalgic for the past and think our future is going to be brighter. Plus it just makes sense to live in the present. Remember:
The past is “history”
The future is a “mystery”
But the “present” is a gift.
Dean, of course he’s not. I probably don’t even need to tell you why. The traffic here seems to be down considerably because others have figured it out too. Go with your instincts and find a more well established site to get informed and discuss important racial matters. I only stay on here because it’s a great opportunity to study the subtle propaganda and psychological warfare tactics being used against us. Plus it’s alot of laughs because the people on here aren’t very good at doing it.
I, too, agree that OD should be more positive and mainstream. However, when “we” are, as it seems, reaching out to the “good” non-Whites and gays, I feel I must urge caution. I’m not saying that the site should be a temple to e.g. Codreanu or Evola, but there must be some boundaries.
I also agree with Alex that a frightening number of people have left since the censorship started. That should be food for thought.
Jack, what is really interesting and fairly upbeat to me is reviews of popular culture. Most people have watch some sort of TV series, sporting events, movies, etc. and analysis of that topic is always bound to draw interest.
Erik Nordman says:
“I also agree with Alex that a frightening number of people have left since the censorship started. That should be food for thought.”
J.R replies:
if these folks clean up their act, abide by the new comment guidelines then they can come back – hopefully they can contribute something positive.
But O.D. is no longer a dive bar where anyone can get drunk start shouting insults and push conspiracy mongering kook nonsense, spread ridiculous gossip about Hunter or other O.D. writers.
Just read and follow the Comment Guidelines – and try to resist the urge to just go off, flame others, say ridiculous things than confirm the worst Hollywood script of WN as RACIST HATERS.
We need a lot more “kindness” – being “kind” to our own kind.
However, when “we” are, as it seems, reaching out to the “good” non-Whites and gays, I feel I must urge caution.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m hardly saying that we ought to pander to non-whites and gays in any way, shape, or form. That would be a recipe for disaster.
James Edwards has written extensively about how the Tea Party’s promise as a majority white conservative movement has been derailed by all this pandering to blacks through Uncle Tom’s such as Lloyd Marcus. And of course, no matter how much they pander to blacks, they’re still going to be called racist, because as Mr. Edwards points out, racist simply means white person.
Rather than being an unapologetically pro-white and conservative movement with a serious agenda, the Tea Party has all too often devolved in this whole “no, we’re not racist!” game.
Of course, as has been pointed out, there are white nationalists at Tea Parties and it’s hardly my intention to cast aspersions upon the Tea Party.
What I mean is that we must reach out to diverse elements of the WHITE community.
What’s considered conspiracy mongering kook nonsense and is quoting an O.D. writer considered spreading malicious gossip?
The Tea Party is right on this issue. You organize, establish your legitimacy, and build power FIRST. Then you introduce your rhetorical agenda in a piecemeal fashion SECOND.
White Nationalists have it exactly backwards. They introduce their rhetorical agenda FIRST. Then fantasize about seizing power SECOND. That’s why all their efforts come to naught.
Alex,
Do you seriously believe an obscure website like OD is controlled by the Mossad? Isn’t it a much more likely explanation that I have simply lost patience with people who talk hard on the internet, but do nothing in real life, especially after investing so much time and resources in the White Nationalist movement?
By “mainstream,” I mean eliminating the barriers of communication between the White majority and White Nationalists, and drawing more attention to the practical ways that White Nationalists can act to reverse our decline.
As I see it, the problem is twofold:
1.) White Nationalists are trapped by a radical rhetoric that is untethered to effective action. The result is political paralysis.
2.) White Nationalists create unnecessary barriers to communication between themselves and their target audience. We should eliminate those barriers.
Huh? Where and when did I say that? That’s like the fourth or fifth time I can remember you having to manufacture something out of the air that I allegedly said. Why is it so hard for Jack Ryan to explain his comments?
Mr. Wallace, I hear you.
Perhaps we ought to learn something from our white European nationalist counterparts. They build up movements, enjoy electoral success, and actually SEIZE POWER.
Sure, the BNP, Sweden Democrats, and other white nationalist organizations cater to Zionist Jews and love Israel, but at least they’re getting their message out in a mainstream and politically successful manner.
As painful as this might me, I think it would be a good thing for white nationalists to temper some of their more Jew-critical and gloom-and-doom rhetoric.
Unfortunately, it’s the messenger who sells the message, not the message itself. And right now, too many white nationalists simply don’t have good messengers.
I do think that it’s foolish to preach to the choir. We don’t need to convince the crowd at Alternative Right, American Renaissance, or the Political Cesspool of our merits.
We need to convince the AVERAGE WHITE PERSON. And so far, our rhetorical tactics have been unable to do so.
Again, I think we could learn something from our white European nationalist counterparts.
*as painful as this might be*
By the way, I liked the previous image at Occidental Dissent that looks like it’s from the 19th century.
Is it possible to put it back up?
I’ve been frustrated with the other themes. I put this one back up because it has a banner image that is more easier to adjust.
I do plan to change the banner to something more American oriented. Ideally, I would like an image from the Revolution or War of 1812.
PP,
EXACTLY. That is what I have been saying. Also, it is not enough to convince people that we are right. We are actually pretty good at that.
The major problem is getting the people who are already converted to do something, to do anything, that is effective at changing the political spectrum. Usually, this involves working with people who are more moderate than we are, toning down the rhetoric, and moving the goal posts at the margins.
It is an uphill struggle.
The same problem exists on the Far Left. In the 1960s, Saul Alinsky coined the term “rhetorical radicals” to describe people who were satisfied by nothing less than instant, transformative change. He repeatedly pointed out that these people interested in revelation, not revolution.
They were looking for saviors, not leaders. Revolutions aren’t made in a day.
I think the problem with we white nationalists, along with people on the far left, is that we’d rather be “right” and think of ourselves as having the moral high ground than achieve victory. In fact, something tells me that some of us would be strangely satisfied when whites do become a marginalized and hated minority if only to say, “see, I told you so!”
And I admit, I cam succumb to this kind of thinking at times. What I like about this blog is that unlike other white nationalist blogs, Occidental Dissent actually challenges fellow white nationalists (myself included) and forces us to adopt new rhetoric and strategies.
Well, I’m no longer interested in just being right. I’m no longer interested in preaching to those who for the most part already agree with me in the first place .
I’m interested in actually WINNING. In order to do that, we’ll have to temper some of our rhetoric and adopt new strategies. I know that my fellow white nationalists will see this as a compromise or as sucking up, but if that’s what it takes to win, so be it. We can adopt an uncompromising approach AFTER we succeed.
-It means convincing your average white Joe to support us, which means possibly having to embrace economic policies that are leftist.
-It means cleaning up trash in white neighborhoods and tackling drug (often meth) problems in certain white communities. White nationalism or no white nationalism, people cannot hate you for cleaning up the community. And by cleaning up the community, we can forge relationships with the average white person, which will allow us to then win them over to our way of thinking.
-It means, as painful as this might be, potentially working together with Zionist Jews and openly supporting Israel. True, it would go against our principles, but look at white European nationalist parties. Perhaps we should follow their example.
I would rather be successful than politically and morally correct within a narrow white nationalist paradigm. We study history so as not to repeat its mistakes. Let’s not make the rhetorical and strategical mistake that the far left and others made back in the day.
Political Pessimist says:
October 4, 2010 at 4:52 pm
“I think the problem with we white nationalists, along with people on the far left, is that we’d rather be “right” and think of ourselves as having the moral high ground than achieve victory. In fact, something tells me that some of us would be strangely satisfied when whites do become a marginalized and hated minority if only to say, “see, I told you so!”
JR Replies.
Yes, you are quite correct on this – it’s a terrible problem. I would even take it a step further – there is a certain personality type that is attracted to “losing causes”. These people weren’t socially successful in high school or in most areas of life and they rationalize the situation as maintaining that the entire social system is wrong/evil – so anyone who is at all successful in the current system is a sell out, traitor.
We saw this big time in David Duke’s mainstream political victories in the early 1990s in his race for LA State Representative and then his very strong challenges to win LA Governor, US Senate. After hearing the news of Duke’s victory, the first victory of an open pro White American candidate since the George Wallace campaigns of the late 60s, early 70s – many hard core WN were angry and upset. Their attitude was:
“I’ve been doing this for 30 years without any victories or media attention – where does David Duke get off winning elections using Reagan style conservative issues and abandoning our TRUTHS? Duke’s a sell out a traitor” etc.
This embrace of being “noble losers” not compromising with “The System”, it’s pure poison for any type of movement, campaign, endeavor. You see it in sales a lot where the salespeople who don’t have any success band together and spread negative energy against the successful salesman.
One important aspect of any serious resistance to the current order is teaching young people to be frugal and economically independent as much as possible. If your health and life depends on a job, then your health and life depends likely on keeping silent on matters of political correctness. This is something people can be taught and learn early in life and plan their affairs accordingly. Too many Sanchezes, Don Imuses, and that guy in NJ who burned the Koran have happened for this important fact of life not to be obvoius. How to accomplish this is a little tougher, but avoiding debt, wortheless degrees from crummy colleges, and having a few skills and trades is a good start.
@PP: How would working with Zionist Jews and supporting Isreal help?
” Isn’t it a much more likely explanation that I have simply lost patience with people who talk hard on the internet, but do nothing in real life, especially after investing so much time and resources in the White Nationalist movement?”
Who “do nothing in real life”? I think you know better, but you simply do not want to “do” the one thing that CAN be done – it is inconvenient and (horrors!) would involve potentially making yourself a target of the US government. You could, if you really wanted “walk the walk”, pick up and move yourself to the Pacific Northwest and work in the physical world for a new White Nation along side Harold Covington instead of doing the very thing that you berate the commenters to your blog as being guilty of; “talking hard on the internet”. I believe that you know that all this rhetoric about “going mainstream” is pure fantasy- once you have become mainstream, you will be no different from all other MSM outlets.
Oldtimer says:
October 4, 2010 at 6:42 pm
“I think you know better, but you simply do not want to “do” the one thing that CAN be done – it is inconvenient and (horrors!) would involve potentially making yourself a target of the US government. You could, if you really wanted “walk the walk”, pick up and move yourself to the Pacific Northwest and work in the physical world for a new White Nation along side Harold Covington instead of doing the very thing that you berate the commenters to your blog as being guilty of; “talking hard on the internet”.
JR Replies.
Please stick around and keep an open mind. I think you will find that O.D. will promote the Northwest Migration, NorthWest Republic and other serious White separatist movements. Most of the opposition to HAC’s novels, activism was based on personal grudges from 20 years ago, O.D. is looking to reach new people who will work for real opportunities in the real world now and in the future.
Yes, the Northwest Imperative has a plan and I think you will find O.D. supporting this plan in small, but effective ways.
Oldtimer,
I don’t think HAC’s Northwest Republic has a plausible chance of success. The vast majority of White Nationalists are unwilling to gather in a Ryan’s Steakhouse. Do you honestly believe these people are going to uproot themselves, move to the Pacific Northwest, and take up arms against the federal government?
It’s not going to happen.
Hunter Wallace says:
October 4, 2010 at 9:22 pm
Oldtimer,
“I don’t think HAC’s Northwest Republic has a plausible chance of success. Do you honestly believe these people are going to uproot themselves, move to the Pacific Northwest, and take up arms against the federal government?”
JR Replies.
I think the Northwest migration is happening organically. In the same way that “White Flight” in the 60s and 70s was an organic movement of Whites moving out of Black terrorized urban areas to the Suburbs – where there was a safe, White life that worked for millions of Whites. Whites are now fleeing California, Arizona NW infested areas of the US to move to Montana, Utah, Oregon – these Whites are not open, out and out WN, nor are they IRA style anti colonial government fighters. They are just Whites that want to go where it’s…. safer, nicer, where the politics is more in line with the way these White folks are.
There are not out and out White nationalist independence movements now in Pacific NorthWest states, instead it’s more along the lines of being for local control of schools, hatred of Washington elites, Hollywood elites, New York elites etc.
Plus the Covington novels are very good. We should promote well written, pro White fiction.
Absolutely! I admit, I too have a strong aversion to anything mainstream or related to “the system.” I see many mainstream types as compromisers and sellouts.
I guess I have to particularly resist this temptation. One of the reasons why I comment here is that unlike other white nationalist publications, you guys are actually willing to challenge your fellow white nationalists and try to eliminate bad habits among them.
In many ways, this is a new learning experience for me, and I resolve to adopt a more practical and positive approach from now on.
I think the hardcore WN reaction to David Duke was absolutely insane.
We’ve all heard the saying, “shoot first, ask questions later.” Well, I think for white nationalists, I think we need to “SUCCEED FIRST, and be rhetorically uncompromising later.”
Unless we have a massive turnaround, I don’t know if we’ll ever see another David Duke again. Jim Russell is the next best thing.
While I essentially agree with what you say, I have a recommendation of my own. I think that Occidental Dissent and similar publications need to start writing articles that highlight the political success of certain pro-white organizations.
I think a major problem of white nationalists is that they feel isolated, powerless, and completely fringe. I think that if we highlighted pro-white success in the mainstream, as well as do bios on historical mainstream white men who were unapologetically pro-white, that could help instill confidence.
We need to know that we CAN succeed. Of course, this is our responsibility and we cannot expect to be spoon fed. I just think that from now on, white nationalist publications need to highlight positives, success stories, etc.
Winners need to sound like winners. Winners need to know that there’s nothing wrong with succeeding in the mainstream.
I think a long post on the success of European nationalist parties is needed.
Let’s learn from those in our position who have actually succeeded.
Rick Sanchez, whatever his intentions, is like a ballplayer on our team who makes a sacrifice bunt. By putting the word out on a MSM outlet that Jews control the media, a lot of people heard something they’ve never heard before. I first saw the news on Yahoo when I started up my computer. I wasn’t looking for it, it was just there in my face. So it was for a lot of heretofore unaware people. Our cause is advanced, at the cost of one man’s career, a man we care nothing about. A win-win scenario.
Most aware Whites know not to say such things aloud, but apparently some of the Rising Tide of Color do not. As more of these people are raised up in the world, hopefully more of them will challenge Jewish supremacy from an anti-racist position, a difficult thing to parry without resorting to brute force, as in this case. We should adopt the battle cry of the Jews, “Let you and him fight!”
Yep, we did it again! Hurrah!