White Hispanic Sanchez vs Northeast Media Elitist Jew “Stewart”
We at the new, cleaned up “mainstream” O.D. do not promote obsessions with THE JEWS, nor do we blame THE JEWS for all the problems White Americans face. Not all Jews are evil, many Jewish people are regular, decent folks. That said, we will present articles that shed light on Jewish issues that effect the legitimate rights of our people to live and prosper in our country.
While Jews do not control all of the US media – Jews are over represented in the US media elite – the MSM; most of the media elite is very hostile to White Indo European Americans.
Today there is an interesting story of a White Hispanic – CNN’s Rick Sanchez that got on the wrong side of the Jewish media elite and he lost his job. He was fired for saying Comedy Central host John Stewart (a Jew with anglicized name) was an elitist, often bigoted against anyone who wasn’t like him. If you listen to the interview, it sounds like Rick Sanchez is trying to play the role of the marginalized “Hispanic” – who is looked down upon by elite Americans. Sanchez doesn’t push the (truth) that Jews control the media, instead he sounds like he is arguing that John Stewart had an easy, rich upbringing and never had to work hard or face discrimination, like Sanchez’s Hispanic immigrant father. The other person in the interview traps Sanchez and says that Stewart is Jewish and puts Sanchez in the hot seat by asking him words to the effect: “are you saying that Jews have never been oppressed”. Sanchez just doesn’t handle this trap well at all, he comes back with words to the effect that “of course Jews have been oppressed in the past, but now they are doing so well, as a lot of the big shots at CNN are Jewish”.
And as most folks in the know understand – in America you can not say or imply that Jews control the media or you will lose your job, face social shunning. Some Jewish people are allowed to brag, that yes Jews control Hollywood, dominate the media because Jews are supposedly so talented, so smart – but no one else is allowed to mention the truth of Jewish media control.
And unlike Mel Gibson, Sanchez was sober. Good for him, though I’d think a professional TV person would be more articulate.
Next question: Will he grovel to get his job back?
Discard says:
October 2, 2010 at 1:51 am (Edit)
And unlike Mel Gibson, Sanchez was sober. Good for him, though I’d think a professional TV person would be more articulate.
Next question: Will he grovel to get his job back?”
Editor replies:
Yes, I think Sanchez will grovel. Maybe we should makes some bets here on O.D. if or how much he will grovel. We have at least one proud White Hispanic on O.D. that fights for our/his people. Maybe he can give us some insights on any current signs of White Hispanics standing up to the Jewish media powers that be.
That YouTube video goes quiet for a few seconds in the middle of the interview. What did he say? Was it censored already? I heard nothing there about jews and the media, just Sanchez whining about how much he hates Stewart.
The postmodern USA: Everyone is out to “out-victimize” everyone else.
The only losers, as usual, are white-protestants. It all comes back to us. We’re evil, everyone else is our victim to varying degrees. (We’re also “ignorant”, so Jews can mock us on TV.)
Victim Sanchez played along with this routine about 80%, but then said the J-word and got fired by The Biggest Victims. Stick to attacking whites of Northern-European stock and you’d have been fine, Rick.
Okay, somebody please shed light on this, but how are Jews in any way, shape, or form oppressed?!
Seriously, the holocaust took place several decades ago on another continent. American Jews do not face the slightest bit of oppression.
They control Hollywood, most of the American media, 1/3 of the Supreme Court, top government positions (though thankfully, Rahm Emanuel has now quit), a huge chunk of our foreign policy, and the two senators from my own state are Jewesses.
I get sick and tired of Jews playing the holocaust card and acting as if they’re an oppressed minority. It’s particularly shameful the way Jewish groups deny other peoples’ genocides or try to downplay them (ie. the ADL for a long time denying the Armenian Genocide, or Abe Foxman having the nerve to tell Ukranians that they cannot refer to their holocaust as a genocide, as depicted in the film “Defamation”).
I do agree that we shouldn’t obsess on Jews, but their disproportionate power that they use to attack whites should be pointed out.
Of course, it goes without saying that there are good Jews such as Paul Gottfried, Jew Among You, Michael Levin, and others.
Conclusion: I guess that the only instance where a “protected minority” can get busted for bigoted statements is if he criticizes Jews. Jews are the protected class of protected classes.
Sánchez should have known better- remember Helen Thomas, Octavia Nasr, Thio Sarrazin (Bundesbank)- and now Sánchez. Jimmy Carter wasn’t fired only because he was/is is own boss. When people see this happening around them often enough- they will just clam up (Pavlovian response) in public and avoid any “controversy” at all costs.
Here is a suggestions for some activism:
Send out this story to various Hispanic forums, particularly “whiter” Hispanic forums.
[…] http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/10/02/jewish-media-power-gets-cnn-white-hispanic-sanchez-fired… […]
We want to make O.D. an important news source for certain “truths” that are not published most every place else. We want O.D. to have a clean, positive, respected image – where we present facts, not just wild rumors and conspiracy theories.
Just another note on the new O.D. policy on comments: we’re tightening things up. We encourage readers to submit comments that specifically address the topic of the post. There were some comments here about Holocaust Revisionism – which is an important subject, it’s just not the subject of this post.
We want to educate and train activists to be more focused on what the people around you are talking about. We need to learn how to listen more and push our idea of THE TRUTH on everyone we see.
Noticed that long time conservative columnist Joe Sobran has died.
Sobran started contributing to magazines like the National Review back when he was a teenager back in the 1960’s.
In the early 1990’s Sobran had a run in with the late Irish Roman Catholic Republican William F. Buckley over the editorial direction National Review was taking regarding the Jews & Israel.
Buckley being a Jew suck took his ball and went home, even though Sobran was a fellow Roman Catholic.
Earlmundo Pitts III says:
October 2, 2010 at 2:52 pm (Edit)
Noticed that long time conservative columnist Joe Sobran has died.
Sobran started contributing to magazines like the National Review back when he was a teenager back in the 1960?s.
In the early 1990?s Sobran had a run in with the late Irish Roman Catholic Republican William F. Buckley over the editorial direction National Review was taking regarding the Jews & Israel.
Buckley being a Jew suck took his ball and went home, even though Sobran was a fellow Roman Catholic.
The Editor replies:
Yes EP III – you are quite correct. The Sobran – Buckley break signified the beginning of the end for National Review. It went totally down hill and became the terrible Jewish Neo Conservative rag that it is now, with Jonah Goldberg as the editor in chief. Peter Brimelow the excellent editor at Vdare.com worked for awhile at National Review and put out some great work – like The War Against Christmas and Alien Nation article, which started the whole debate on immigration. But then Brimelow and other White Gentiles who had any sympathy for our people were purged. Buckley just got old and weird and was desperately trying to hang on to a wealthy New York lifestyle – Buckley was really weird as an old man, having sycophants surround him and sing his praises.
I’m not trying to attack the writers on here but I’ve had a few posts that have been deleted in the past few weeks which had nothing to do with the comment guidelines being violated. I notice other people’s posts being deleted as well like the one I noticed a few minutes ago about someone whose screenname I can’t remember talking about ending the Fed. Granted it’s a bit off topic but so is the Holocaust and it was allowed. I get the impression there’s some very heavy censorship going on here and your losing people because of it. What’s wrong with a free flow of ideas?
Buckley always was “affected”, but, we in the flyover bought his act. Today, anyone with any sense realizes that an “Irish intellectual” is an oxymoron.
Regarding Joe Sobran: The Buckley/Sobran dust up was a big deal. A whole issue of National Review was given over to writers arguing whether or not Sobran was an antisemite. Sobran was allowed to defend himself, in the best essay of the issue. Most memorably, he wrote, (My phrasing here) I can see how people might feel that I was obsessed if I wrote about Burundi or some such place all the time, but it’s not me who puts Israel on the front page of the New York Times three times a week. It’s not me who sends billions of dollars in cash and weapons every year to a small, far-away country. How am I the one who is obsessed here?
That issue of NR was published as a book, In Search of Anti-Semitism. You can get it for less than a dollar from Amazon, if you want to read the rebuttals. Buckley himself had nothing to say.
Rich Sanchez sayz he ain’t White, but Hispanic. LOL! Looks like a cracker to me. What is he going for, an unWhite skin privilege? Listen up ladies, this fall, brown is the new white.
Jack Ryan, the comment policy of deleting the majority of comments is too much. I have had two comments deleted in this thread (this one will be #3), and I am no troll.
This is ridiculous.
What comment-section is ever an echo-chorus for the writer’s views? And if it were, why would anyone read it?
“Jack Ryan, the comment policy of deleting the majority of comments is too much.”
Blasphemy!
“I have had two comments deleted in this thread (this one will be #3), and I am no troll.”
Perhaps not, yet no less a fate you richly deserve.
“We encourage readers to submit comments that specifically address the topic of the post.”
Does commentary of a satirical bent get in under the wire? Let us be as Nietzsche would have us, cheerfully serious, and not morbidly pretentious.
“We want to educate and train activists to be more focused on what the people around you are talking about.”
Greg Johnson couldn’t, er, could, have said it better. And did. Good advice all the same. There are other sites (Counter-Currents) which focus on creating a counter superstructure (noble lies) to the existing liberal one and foisting it to preeminence is Gramscian style as opposed to maximizing the mainstream palinability (palatability) of White advocacy. Then there are those (Majority Rights) which can only be concerned with arriving at the truth of the matter, and nothing but, in endlessly excruciating, eggheaded fashion.
Looks like a division of labor that cannot speak its name.
Wanderer says:
October 2, 2010 at 6:34 pm (Edit)
Jack Ryan, the comment policy of deleting the majority of comments is too much. I have had two comments deleted in this thread (this one will be #3), and I am no troll.
The Editor replies:
I apologize to anyone like Wanderer who feels that O.D.’s new comment approval standards are too restrictive. And I understand that you are not a troll.
First, all should understand that O.D. had a very serious problem with the comment section when all comments were getting posted. People were engaging in typical movement flame wars, spreading gossip and wild personal smears against Hunter and others. That’s a huge turn-off to mainstream readers that don’t want to be involved in any way in junior high school style social back stabbing.
O.D.’s commonsense pro White positions have huge support amongst the White American public, but the larger White American public just doesn’t want to be associated with an extremely negative “Movement” cult.
O.D.’s comment section is trying to get away from sounding a feeling like a loud bar, where people are getting drunk and shouting, just to call attention to themselves. O.D. is trying to be more like a coffee shop meeting place where intelligent folks come to share articles, essays, video links, advice to others who share a common heritage.
Right now, I am editing out many comments. Please do not take this personally. The posts, articles should be the main focus at O.D. – and comments should address the topic of the post, so people shouldn’t get off topic and bring up subjects they want to shout about.
We want O.D. to be a healthy, positive place that growing numbers of White Indo European Americans and Whites throughout the world feel safe to come by and read/see something new, positive, know that O.D. is a safe, good place to be in an increasingly hostile world.
But, please accept my apologies to anyone who feels that I have been too restrictive on the comments section.
Wander writes:
“This is ridiculous.
What comment-section is ever an echo-chorus for the writer’s views? And if it were, why would anyone read it?”
The Editor replies:
I agree that the comments section shouldn’t be an echo-chorus for the post writer’s view. We don’t want O.D. to be like the old Rush Limbaugh show of “Ditto heads” where the only callers allowed through are people who gush on and on about how much they agree with Rush and how he is the only one telling it like it is.
It’s perfectly OK to present comments in opposition to the main points of the post. But please do so in an intelligent, respectful manner. And O.D. is no longer allowing personal smear attacks on O.D. writers or editors. So posts that feature ad hominem attacks against me, Hunter or O.D such as “You’re all NEO CONS, FRONTING FOR THE GOP”, “Who are you to tell others what they can and can’t say, I’ve been here for a long time, you suck” comments like that will not get published.
O.D. is going mainstream. O.D. is not selling out – but we are interesting in being much more successful in “selling” our ideas and our program to mainstream White Americans, Whites all over the world who are not in a 24/7 American WN “Movement” cult.
I hope that clarifies things.
Keep the faith for our folk.
14 Words
And again – please make your comments directly reference the post which in this case is:
Jewish Media Power Gets CNN White Hispanic Sanchez Fired
There are sites like Counter Currents which no one in the mainstream will ever read and which have no impact on the political spectrum.
The content of those sites demonstrate in spades that many White Nationalists, not all, are flat out unwilling to communicate with ordinary people in their own terms, and are even busily erecting fresh new barriers to communication where none ought to exist.
There are sites like VNN Forum which are morally repulsive and communicate to ordinary people that White Nationalists are unhinged sociopaths and deranged kooks.
Finally, there are sites like Majority Rights which spend years navel gazing over boring, obscure philosophical subjects like the metaphysics of Heidegger, which no one but racialist bookworms find relevant to their lives.
The comment situation has been resolved. No one has the power to edit or delete comments but me now. I am tired of receiving emails about the matter.
Hey Wanderer and others, O.D. has gone kosher…. I mean mainstream, we’ve partnered with the neoconservative wing of the Republican Party and several Jewish donors to head off a disastrous (for us) takeover of the Republican Party by the old right and certain elements of the Tea Party Movement that haven’t been Becked or Palinized. Comments regarding Paleoconservatives, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Libertarianism, 911 Truthers, monetary policy, ending the Fed or any other comments that are construed as a threat to the Jewish power structure can and will be censored. Anyone who believes such things are part of a dropout society, a cult of societal misfits, kooks and nut cases who cannot function in normal White society. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, your just crazy.
27 Words
A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer.
SHULCHAN ARUCH (The Talmud)
1.) There is no partnership between OD and the “neoconservative wing of the Republican Party.” I have always supported Republicans like Senators Jeff Session and Jim DeMint who receive high marks on immigration.
2.) This website doesn’t have any Jewish donors. We are not taking donations anymore. You pulled that one out of your overactive imagination.
3.) Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought you hated the Tea Party?
4.) That’s ridiculous. How could this website which receives a few thousand visitors a day – the majority of whom don’t even participate in the political process – stop the “Old Right” from taking over the Republican Party?
I thought you people hated the Old Right paleocons. I’m the one who likes Pat Buchanan and Sam Francis. Your hero Alex Linder hates them both.
5.) I voted for Ron Paul in the 2008 Republican primary. I support Rand Paul’s campaign.
6.) There are plenty of kooks and social misfits in White Nationalist circles. No one who has any experience with the movement says otherwise. These people are ubiquitous on the internet.
7.) Finally, OD hasn’t gone kosher. I don’t know what you mean by that. Isn’t this thread is about the Jewish Question?
What is really bothering you is that we are trying to build bridges between pro-Whites and ordinary White people. You would rather build barriers. That speaks volumes about your intentions.
I hate the Glen Beck/Sarah Palin co-opted Tea Parties. I actually met a White Nationalist at one of these rallies so I’m not knocking them. Don’t put words in my mouth. Who said I hated the old right paleocons? Pat Buchanan is a favorite of mine also. I just have one question. If you support Rand Paul why are you allowing Jack Ryan to censor comments about him or his father or libertarianism in general?
I’m picking up some very bad vibes from this website with all the heavy censoring. If you want to silence some of your critics, put some Paleoconservative/Libertarian articles on here for a change and I’ll keep my mouth shut.
1.) You have repeatedly attacked the Tea Party. As it happens, I have met White Nationalists at the Tea Party myself. The Political Cesspool was at the Tax Day Tea Party. There are plenty of White Nationalists involved in the Tea Party movement.
2.) You knock Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck without realizing that they are able to do something which White Nationalists have proven completely incapable of doing.
They have inspired apathetic Whites to get involved in the political process. That’s an accomplishment which veteran organizers know is far more important than the specifics of their message.
4.) Haven’t you repeatedly attacked conservatives on this website? Haven’t you repeatedly attacked the Tea Party and the GOP?
5.) Like I said above, I now have the exclusive power to edit comments on this website. That’s as of thirty minutes ago.
I just posted a list of comment guidelines. If you play by those rules, which any reasonable person would agree are fair, your comment will be approved.
Returning to the subject, I think everyone here can agree that Rick Sanchez, by all accounts a liberal douchebag, got fired for going off script on the Jewish Question.
He challenged the myth of powerless Jews. Then he was canned by powerful Jews. Not the first time this has happened. As Jack Ryan points out, this is an appropriate time to raise the Jewish Question.
I have little sympathy for Sanchez getting fired, he was a big commie agitator who sided with Spanish speaking Illegal Aliens from the largest Indian Reservation on the continent: Mexico. Had Sanchez lived in America in 1960 he would no doubt have Anglicized his last name and sought to blend into ordinary White America, but in this upside down PC version of America where Whites are the lowest rung on the New Feudal order he prefers to identify non-whites from the defunct Spanish Empire. He was one of the most obnoxious, left wing anchors on CNN, I won’t miss him. Yet this shows which tribe occupies the highest rung on the PC ladder. Perhaps some reporter should try to goad Obama into making an anti-semetic remark akin to Sanchez. Then just watch the media and democrats pile it on and demand his impeachment. Suddenly the jewish media bosses would somehow discover that questions over a possible Kenyan birth wouldn’t be just for “tea baggers” anymore.
I don’t sympathize with him either. I dislike Jon Stewart, but I hate Rick Sanchez. Stewart’s ribbing of Sanchez was actually pretty funny.
palinable (palatable) – I hereby grant Wallace permission to use my coinage
“spend years navel gazing over boring, obscure philosophical subjects like the metaphysics of Heidegger,”
I never read, I’m just good at faking it. Besides, how are we supposed to beat the Jews if we can’t out pilpul them?
I lived in Miami in the 90s when Rick Sanchez was a local anchor on Miami TV. He worked a station that was basically the local equivalent of the National Enquirer. Even though Rick Sanchez is Cuban, the guy was anti-White even back then. Not many people know Rick Sanchez killed a man while driving drunk. I’m glad this incident happened because it might help a few more people wise up when it comes to Jews, but Sanchez is not a guy who deserves sympathy.
“I never read, I’m just good at faking it.”
Actually, that’s not far from the truth. I’ll read maybe 1 for every 10 books the eggheads read. The rest I can synthesize from a truncated surveying. What I can do is actually think. Something which seems to elude even the vast majority of the more “intellectual” non-Stormfront racialists on the Internut. Either you got the juice or you don’t. No amount of “reading” will avail you of it if you ain’t got it.
I spent much of the last decade reading books. For the most part, it was a waste of my time. In hindsight, I was retreating to my comfort zone.
The only way to “beat the Jews” is to build a power base in the real world.
Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish!!
Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is “nothing more than a screen to present chosen views.” The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually “think outside of the (Jewish) box.” –Michael Santomauro
Hunter wrote:
I spent much of the last decade reading books. For the most part, it was a waste of my time. In hindsight, I was retreating to my comfort zone.
I am glad you got free Hunter.
I didn’t know anything about Sanchez prior to this incident but if he’s the anti-white water carrier that everyone says he is then I have no sympathy for him. But this also proves the Jews don’t believe in free speech contrary to their carefully crafted public image as champions of the first amendment when white people are on the receiving end of criticism.
If Sanchez had been fired for negative remarks against whites the Jewish, oops, white liberal media would have rallied around him and demanded his reinstatement.
Back to Operational Nationalism: in the Land of ZOG, Rick Sanchez had the guts and/or stupidity to use the “J” word in a non-adulatory public context. Now he is on the unemployment line. Whatever his past, he did us a favor. Functionally – provided he does not grovel – he is now an ally. I’ll put it in terms even Capt. Chaos can understand: the enemy of our greatest Enemy is a friend. First win, then winnow out the chaff.
Looks like Big Media proved Sanchez’s point rather effectively.
I think us Jews get more latitude in criticizing our own people – to a point. In the future, if any anti-Semites want to say something about Jews (and get away with it), just contact me. For a fee, I’ll say it! – just kidding.
rhayat1 says:
Looks like Big Media proved Sanchez’s point rather effectively.
“I think us Jews get more latitude in criticizing our own people – to a point. In the future, if any anti-Semites want to say something about Jews (and get away with it), just contact me. For a fee, I’ll say it! – just kidding.”
Very good.
Please understand that we have regular Jewish folks coming around all the time who don’t hate White American Gentiles, who are actually pretty happy they live in America – a country that is mostly White European American.
Most regular Jewish people are not sinister conspirators – out to destroy everything decent and wholesome in America. A lot of Jewish people don’t really get all bent out of shape if regular White Americans want to sing Christmas carols.
To these regular Jewish folks, I and many other O.D. writers and readers extend our best wishes.
That said – we’re trying to work for the survival of our people – in hopes that our people do not go down the way our kinsmen in Algeria, Rhodesia Zimbabwe went down.
And yes, we are R-A-C-I-S-T
14 words
ComFas,
Your faith in the coming apocalypse, by which you apparently believe – as our cosmic clash with Jewry comes to a Final end – a mighty river of a moral cleansing will pour forth, is truly touching in its melodramatics. Let it be instead that we get out of this all with as much of what we have now still with us, I include in that whatever innocence can be expected in injuring and being injured no more than prudent self-defense will allow. All else is insanity and misanthropy.
Why is the troll “Earl Pitts” still allowed to post anti-Irish and anti-Catholic comments here, especially with the new improved comment policy? He is a text book example of the kind of person you need to get rid of if you expect to appeal to mainstream conservatives.
“Why is the troll “Earl Pitts” still allowed to post anti-Irish and anti-Catholic comments here,”
It should not trouble you overmuch. Who would be influenced by it but simple-minded thin-skinned and the morally deficient? Of course in the real world that is always a necessary consideration. Which explains – and we really all do know this, our actions indicate as much – the sporadic bowdlerization of Nordicism. Nordics are in many significant ways the best of what we are. But to say that, to say the truth, is less than charitable to those we also consider rightly members of our race and value accordingly. Also, it may well give licence to those Nordics who would give vent to an abusive supremacist impulse thus confirming their moral deficiency. Yet and still, this is no argument against Nordic preservation and to gainsay that is to embrace, I dare say it, a more than small bit of nihilism.
“Most regular Jewish people are not sinister conspirators – out to destroy everything decent and wholesome in America.”
Laugh out loud, regular Jews are the ones who fund (through donations) the ADL and SPLC.
The reality of the matter is ALL JEWS are a problem and something like Byzantiums anti-Judaic Codes are going to be needed to get them back in line.
The real kicker for right now though is who Sanchez will be replaced by: co-hosts Kathleen Parker and Eliot Spitzer (Jew)
That is some real chutzpah from the Cabala News Network!
The American Moment Magazine is subtitled, “The Jewish Magazine for the ’90s”. Its edition of Aug. 1996 shouted the startling headline “Jews Run Hollywood – So What?” The author is Michael Medved who states:
“It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names.”
This was 14 years ago and we are still debating this idea as if it has not been already settled.
However in relation to this particular incident the lawyer’s phrase Res ipsa loquitur says it all, the thing speaks for itself. How could an ‘oppressed minority’ get a major media figure fired in a matter of hours if they were truly powerless?
…
Please understand that we have regular Black folks coming around all the time who don’t hate White Americans, who are actually pretty happy they live in America – a country that is mostly White European American.
Most regular Black people are not sinister conspirators – out to destroy everything decent and wholesome in America. A lot of Black people don’t really get all bent out of shape if regular White Americans want to wave the Confederate flag.
Just speculating but here’s my prediction. Little Ricky the Cuban will be hired by Big Jew media mogul Haim Sabam for a top slot (worth millions naturally) at Univision. On the condition he never opens his mouth about jews controlling the media again, except for the required groveling apology, of course.
Reading some of the comments lumping Cuban-Americans with mestizo Mexicans- I cannot help but laugh.
Most Cubans that arrived in the US-1960-1980 (before Mariel) -FYI- were middle- and upper-middle class people with very socially conservative values, as “white” as anyone else in Europe, and interested in education and professional advancement This is one reason for the endless bad-news spin the “Newsmedia” loves to tag on Miami and Cuban exiles in general. Cuban-Americans stand for everything the left-libs love to disparage. FYI- Cuban-Americans are one of the staunchest enemies of the current open-borders policy. Mentioning open-borders in Miami is almost as bad as saying anything positive about the Castro Clan.
Thank you.
Rodrigo says:
October 3, 2010 at 2:36 pm
Reading some of the comments lumping Cuban-Americans with mestizo Mexicans- I cannot help but laugh.
Most Cubans that arrived in the US-1960-1980 (before Mariel) -FYI- were middle- and upper-middle class people with very socially conservative values, as “white” as anyone else in Europe, and interested in education and professional advancement This is one reason for the endless bad-news spin the “Newsmedia” loves to tag on Miami and Cuban exiles in general. Cuban-Americans stand for everything the left-libs love to disparage. FYI- Cuban-Americans are one of the staunchest enemies of the current open-borders policy. Mentioning open-borders in Miami is almost as bad as saying anything positive about the Castro Clan.
Thank you.”
JR Replies:
You are quite correct that many or even most of the original Cuban exiles in Miami were White, middle class or upper class Whites. There were/are a lot of White Hispanics in Latin America, and in Spain. Spain is a European country, so why shouldn’t Hispanics from Spain be White Europeans?
But all should understand that now in America the racial power game is that everyone gets special points, special affirmative action treatment if they claim to not be White, if they make some claim that they are poor and oppressed like Blacks, gays, Jews, Native American Indians etc. So lots of White Hispanics like Sanchez are getting in to this chip on the shoulder, “we’re victims of racism, we’re on the side of the masses of poor NWs etc.”
Also note that in Latin America since the 1940s, the Leftist Marxist revolutionaries have had a large component of racial resentment where the Indians, Mestizos and Blacks resent the wealthy and middle class Whites, so Marxist revolutionaries incite the poor Non Whites to attack middle class and wealthy Whites. And, like in America, some wealthy Whites like to get in to Marxism and try to be the leaders of the revolutionary masses of NWs. Che was from a wealthy White Argentine family. Castro is also White.
These wealthy Whites who try to become leaders of the masses of poor Non Whites, these people are called “Grachites” – named after a famous Roman Patrician family that was doing like the Kennedys do – always taking the side of “The People”.
Jack Ryan: “Very good.
Please understand that we have regular Jewish folks coming around all the time who don’t hate White American Gentiles, who are actually pretty happy they live in America – a country that is mostly White European American.
Most regular Jewish people are not sinister conspirators – out to destroy everything decent and wholesome in America. A lot of Jewish people don’t really get all bent out of shape if regular White Americans want to sing Christmas carols.
To these regular Jewish folks, I and many other O.D. writers and readers extend our best wishes.
That said – we’re trying to work for the survival of our people – in hopes that our people do not go down the way our kinsmen in Algeria, Rhodesia Zimbabwe went down.
And yes, we are R-A-C-I-S-T”
I am trying to understand your opinions. Some “regular Jewish folks” are OK, as long as they are not part of the Jewish elite that is destroying our culture. Our survival allows us to extend to them our best wishes. Yet we are “R-A-C-I-S-T”?
Are there not also Blacks, Mexicans, Thais and Indians who are just “regular folks” who fit in and are not a threat. Why not extend our best wishes to them too? In fact the number of activist Latinos is tiny in comparison to the total number here. The number of activst Asians is almost zero.
Is it all a matter or proportion? Asian Americans are 4.4% of the population. Are they to be feared more than Jews who only make up 3% of the population? Are they more effective in harming out society?
If you and Hunter are traveling the same path to the kinder, gentler White Nationalism I think you may have many contradictions in your new philosophy that you should clarify for us. Your comments above seem to highlight them.