About Hunter Wallace 12390 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

50 Comments

  3. Robert E. Lee is the most pathetic and most treasonous traitor in the history of the United States; in fact, in the history of the nation state. He is responsible for the destruction of the South, for most of the deaths in the Civil War, and for all the racial problems we have today. If anyone is burning in hell, it’s him. He should have been hanged, drawn and quartered right after the war.

  7. Apart from that it’s a pity he didn’t win. No phillipines invasion, no cuban invasion, no half assed occupation of Haiti. No example for the German Empire to copy so probably no ww1 this no ww2. Centralization would be anathema. No Korea, no Vietnam and probably no Iraq war. half of Africa would be white and civilized. When whites make war they’d have settled conquered land instead of bleeding themselves dry to liberat sullen blacks.

    Obviously there would be wars but generally it would be hunting down blacks and exterminating them.

  10. It’s a good question.

    The SDS expected to kill 25 millions.

    The population has increased since Dorhn and the Gang were running around.

  11. Trying to compare Southron racial attitudes of the 1860’s to the ones necessary today is a non starter as we did not have a negro problem until after the yankees made the negro another of their anti White Southron weapons.

  12. If Lee had stayed loyal to the Union, the war would have been less than a year and the South’s spirit would have been crushed. Without the longer war, we might not have had the Military Industrial complex which was developed from the Civil War primarily. Also maybe us anti-war people would have been able to be more politically united. Anyway, our brutal colonialist policy had already been started before the Civil War, with the Indian wars, Mexican American War and adventures in Nicaragua.

  13. You are stupid prick.

    If the US had remained a looser confederation it couldn’t have become the all conquering monster that straddles the globe today.

    Plenty of racist rightwingers probably look at the Vietnam war as the logical progression of Lincoln’s techniques. A faked crisis, demonized political rivals followed by industrial slaughter and a peace treaty that recreated the situation right after Dien Bien Phu anyway. The war in the Phillipines was a shocker for many Southerners, but hardly unanticipated. The union and centralization were critically important elements in those wars. Not that a few Asians matter much in the broad scheme of things.

  14. Stonelifter,

    I can well imagine that many Southerners at the time were fine with abolition. Doesn’t make them right. Sam Houston for example.

  15. Proud Globalist Race Traitor says:
    January 19, 2013 at 10:34 pm

    Robert E. Lee is the most pathetic and most treasonous traitor in the history of the United States; in fact, in the history of the nation state. He is responsible for the destruction of the South, for most of the deaths in the Civil War, and for all the racial problems we have today. If anyone is burning in hell, it’s him. He should have been hanged, drawn and quartered right after the war

    Why the fuck do you come here you Jew troll????

  16. Proud Globalist Race Traitor says:
    January 19, 2013 at 10:34 pm

    Robert E. Lee is the most pathetic and most treasonous traitor in the history of the United States; in fact, in the history of the nation state. He is responsible for the destruction of the South, for most of the deaths in the Civil War, and for all the racial problems we have today. If anyone is burning in hell, it’s him. He should have been hanged, drawn and quartered right after the war.

    Why is this Jew kike allowed to post here????

  17. “..all conquering monster that straddles the globe today.”

    – You seem to like it enough to live in it.

    “..industrialized slaughter..”

    – Oh really. Try telling that to my father, or any other pilot who flew combat sorties in that war.

  19. Few were good with abolition John, from what I can tell, but from what I have read there was very little animosity between Whites of any station and negros of any station. They knew their place and rolled with it and most Whites were not hostile to them. There was, orfor the most part, no need for any kind of hostility until after the War of Northern Aggression ended and yankees started using free negros as a political weapon against Southron Whites

    As for the story about Lee, who knows? From what I can tell he was kind toward negros even though he thought them beneath White men because he put a great deal of stock in being kind. especially to those beneath his station.

  20. Plenty of racist rightwingers probably look at the Vietnam war as the logical progression of Lincoln’s techniques. A faked crisis, demonized political rivals followed by industrial slaughter and a peace treaty that recreated the situation right after Dien Bien Phu anyway.

    Lincoln liked to kill white Christians. Perhaps he’d approve because we lost many good white men in Vietnam. He was an Indian lover so much that during the Blackhawk War he was known for saving the life of an Indian spy. This leads me to believe he’d be an old ugly Jane Fonda. The logical progression of Lincolnism were the US entries into the World Wars. A draft followed by laying waste to cultured betters, that’s Lincoln’s ghost.

  21. Rainauld, I’m not a Jew, although I do serve the Jewish agenda and I understand that. I oppose them on the Palestinian issue though. And no whites and blacks did not get along in the Antebellum South. What about the Underground Railroad? Oh that’s right, it was made up by the Jooos/Yankees/Catholics/Lincoln.

  22. PGRT – I initially thought you were a troll. Now I thnk you are just mental. Why would you oppose the Jewish genocide of Palestinians, and not their on-going genocide of Whites, or any other Race?

  24. Re: “I do serve the Jewish agenda and I understand that”:

    Please expound on what you understand is the Jewish agenda.

  28. “genocide of Palestinians, and not their on-going genocide of Whites, or any other Race?”

    Twisted world. We’re bombarded with TV ads donation for kids from India, south America, Africa. Why can’t their own governments take of them?

    Be fruitful, and multiply.

  30. Mack Lee had a bit of the Br’ Rabbit in him by the looks of it.

    He was a preacher later in life:

      ” Can you white peoe give my church some funds? No?” The aged negro cocked his head on one side. “What, I ain’t gwine ter turn away Ole Marse Robert’s nigger is yer? You didn’t know dat I was Gen. Robert Lee’s cook all through de wah, did yer?” Every reporter in the office considered that introduction sufficient, and listened for half an hour to William Mack Lee, who followed General Robert E. Lee as body guard and cook throughout the Civil War. When the negro lifted his bent and broken figure from a chair to take his leave every man in the office reached into his pocket, for a contribution.

  31. “I can well imagine that many Southerners at the time were fine with abolition. Doesn’t make them right. Sam Houston for example.”

    Sam Houston was decidedly not an abolitionist. He was a slave owner. He supported the protection of slavery in the Compromise of 1850 and was opposed to secession. He was an old school Old Republic man and when he led Texas in independence from Mexico it was always with the intent of having it annexed by the United States. Many Southerners took this view (pro slavery and pro Union) which was represented by the candidacy of John Bell in the presidential election of 1860 in which he won several Southern states including Virginia.

    You are wrong yet again John. You don’t know jack shit about history and seem too lazy or thick-headed to learn. Stop posting.

  32. When the negro lifted his bent and broken figure from a chair to take his leave every man in the office reached into his pocket, for a contribution.

    Isn’t that touching.

    [H]e put a great deal of stock in being kind. especially to those beneath his station.

    Oh, yes, that’s the impression one can’t help gaining around here: how kind Southerners are. You people have been spewing this same sentimental claptrap for a century and a half. Please–secede–and keep jerking each other off.

  33. Houston was a unionist though. So he wasn’t prepared to choose the Confederacy. De facto abolitionist in that sense as at least 50% of union fanaticism was abortionist in origin.

  34. Actually I thought it showed how good a hustler Mack Lee was.
    Didn’t really think about who the whites were portrayed at all.
    Br’ Rabbit was a sneeky fucker.

  35. Houston parted ways with his slave owning peers when the war started. The Union and abortionists trumped friendship.

  37. Rudel,

    My point was that plenty of Souterners were in fact against the Confederacy.
    I’m not wrong. You merely decided to misinterpret a casual statement. You can’t prove me wrong by fleshing out a point I made.

    Wrong again with what?

  38. Houston appeared to abide with the political niceties of elections and the Union. The Confederates not so much. In the end Houston was willing to go along to get along.

  39. Actually I thought it showed how good a hustler Mack Lee was.

    Sorry, John. I was wondering whether I’d misread you–and misread the passage you’d selected.

  41. Never said Southron are kind, I said Lee put stock in it. Reading comprehension, do you have it? Or is the point of your miserable life to stir up shut like the other non amercian yankee whop?

  42. “In the end Houston was willing to go along to get along.”

    No he wasn’t you moron. He was severely excoriated and thrown out of office for maintaining his allegiance to the Union. And there is no way of misinterpreting your absolutely false statement that he was “fine” with abolition.

  44. His last political statement read like a man who couldn’t make up his fucking mind.
    Too damn old for politics. He was fine with the abolitionists in the union and counseled the confederates to bend over and take it like junior partners in a pyramid scheme.

  45. In fact he appears to have pin pointed the fanatical nature of the union and told his people to go along with it or they’d deserve destruction. He should have pitched in with his own peers instead of slinking off.

  46. Never said Southron are kind, I said Lee put stock in it.

    I know very well what you said, stonelifter. It’s the same thing you always say.

  47. “He should have pitched in with his own peers instead of slinking off.”

    Sam Houston never slinked away from anything in his life you unlettered oaf.

  48. “Never said Southron are kind, I said Lee put stock in it.”

    Then Lee was un-Southron in his approach, in that respect (being kind to them)especially post-war?

  49. “In fact he appears to have pin pointed the fanatical nature of the union and told his people to go along with it or they’d deserve destruction.”

    Knowing the industrial superiority of the North he said they would suffer destruction not that they deserved it. Well I guess he was right. The War Between the States was eminently avoidable and the South would have kept their slaves and eventually would have been compensated for their inevitable emancipation.

    Instead they were destroyed. It resulted in the destruction of the American Republic and the worst disaster in our history for which we are still paying the price today.

  50. The Pennsylvania invasion was certain to fail against known overwhelming odds, and ordering that Charge into the artillery at Gettysburg was near insanity.

Comments are closed.