Super Caravan Of Migrants Approaching Southern Border, Presidential Cuckoldry Likely

Let’s be adults here and take what some might call a black pill and others might call a common sense pill of realism:

President Trump and the GOP have been pathetic on the issue of illegal immigration – worse even than Barack Obama during his first term almost ten years ago.

Migrant caravans from Central America have poured into the United States almost totally unimpeded, and although you’ll hear some of the Alt-Right E-Celebs talk about victories and 4-D chess (still), nothing has actually been done to prevent the invasion of our lands.

And so the groups testing their luck continue to grow, with the latest one currently numbering several thousand and expected to grow exponentially before they reach the border.

Yahoo News:

Up to 3,000 migrants crossed from Honduras into Guatemala on Monday on a trek northward, after a standoff with police in riot gear and warnings from Washington that migrants should not try to enter the United States illegally.

The crowd more than doubled in size from Saturday, when some 1,300 people set off from northern Honduras in what has been dubbed “March of the Migrant,” an organizer said. The migrants plan to seek refugee status in Mexico or pass through to the United States.

Reuters could not independently verify the number of participants, but images showed a group carrying backpacks and clogging roads near the border, some waving the Honduran flag.

The impoverished nations of Central America, from which thousands of migrants have fled in recent years, are under mounting pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration to do more to curb mass migration.

“We are seriously concerned about the caravan of migrants traveling north from Honduras, with false promises of entering the United States by those who seek to exploit their compatriots,” the U.S. Embassy in Honduras said in a statement on Sunday evening.

U.S. Vice President Mike Pence last week called on presidents in the region to tackle the issue, saying Washington would be willing to help with economic development and investment in return.

“We’re going to drop in on Donald Trump. He has to take us in,” said Andrea Fernandez, 24, who left Honduras with a newborn baby, a 5-year-old daughter and 7-year-old son because she said she could not find work and feared for their safety.

Donald is already sounding off on Twitter, but apparently he’s forgotten the fact that he actually has the power to order the military to open fire on migrants trying to cross into the country – I guess you could also be friendly and just throw nets over them or something.

I remember much the same rhetoric back around Easter when we had the first noteworthy caravan approaching, and then nothing since.

Words and bluster have lost their meaning, and it would do everyone well to remember that at the end of the day, the demographics mean more than GOP or Democrat electoral wins, and mean exponentially more than warm feels caused by seeing triggered Communists having public tantrums.

Keep all of this in mind during the next week or two when we’ll likely see this entire horde pass through unscathed after the usual legalisms and pleas are sorted through.

About Marcus Cicero 593 Articles
Proud White Man, devoted husband and father, and Occidental Dissent contributor.


  1. So far, Drumpf is as bad as Merkel with allowing this invasion. At least that cunt is honest about destroying White civilization, Donnie just sends out a bunch of sanctimonious tweets and does nothing so the result is the same.

      • Merkel is a part Jew and was a Communist thug in East Germany.
        NOTHING is being done to stop the invasion, Jews are getting what they want.
        Read this and you will know what (((THEY))) are doing to Americans who are the REAL AMERICANS.
        March 04, 2004
        Mass Immigration Eats Through The Melting Pot
        By Sam Francis

        • @KC

          Just got word that Sweden is about to deport a six year old orphan Ukrainian boy…….whilst granting amnesty to 9000 Afghans at the same time. May this cuckolded cesspit become a sharia state sooner rather than later!
          Will Germany fall first, or France or Sweden? Maybe Cuck island. I can’t wait to find out.

          • The establishment of Sweden have mastered the art of making their political system appear to be a democracy, while it is under their authoritarian rule.

          • Unfortunately Sweden is democracy. In our progressive world of course nobody knows what that word means anymore but when we think that democracy is the will of the majority, then unfortunately yes, most Swedes support open borders or are too dumb to understand that voting for left and mass immigration are somehow connected.

            Fun fact. The less people died in recent wars, the more cucked the nation is. War is one thing where you must face reality to avoid getting killed and NPCs can,t do that and taking their bad genes into the grave.

            Sometimes I think that war is like immune system. Nations like every living organism must time to time somehow get rid from shitty stuff inside them.

          • They don’t have free speech in Sweden. If people aren’t allowed to know both sides of an argument, they can’t make rational decisions. When a political party nears power they change the rules.

            The youngest, fittest and best are chosen to go die in wars. The weak, old and sick stay home. Wars are dysgenic. After WW2, Europe and America turned into the biggest cuckolds on the planet.

          • There are two expressions that died out when the World War II Generation took power.

            “The American people won’t STAND for it.”

            “This is America. I can express any opinion I want to.”

    • Merkel and other female EU leaders (Ms May) are demon controlled witches. Useful idiots who will be executed by Muslims when they have served a purpose incl. EU male leaders like Macron. Muslims (Saudi’s) will soon rule Eurostan.

  2. Trump likely won’t do a bloody thing……there’s more pressing issues in the Middle East to attend to. You know…..priorities.

    • The timing just before elections is no coincidence. Our anti-White elites are betting Trump will do nothing, proving to his followers that he’s nothing but a big wind bag. A demoralizing tactic. I wouldn’t take bets against them.

      • @Apple Pie

        Proverbs 5:10 Lest strangers be filled with thy wealth; and thy labours be in the house of a stranger

        Both of these Hebrew words for the definition of “strange” have connotations of a non-Adamic race (nonwhites). The KJV has correctly rendered #H5237, nokrîy as, “alien”, “foreigner”, and “outlandish”.

  3. During the Vietnam war, not a single hamlet or base was overrun when “Spooky” (AC-47) was overhead. By the end of the war, interdiction on the Ho Chi Minh Trail was taken over by “Specter” (AC-130). “Super Spooky” should be employed for Border patrol. A couple of passes should suffice to deter any further encroachments or invasions, once a body count is taken.

    • Trump is obviously not serious when he claims to want secure borders. I wonder if he takes anything seriously?

      • I doubt it. He seems to say whatever’s needed to keep everyone guessing, while he does his own thing. Dems howling about guns? He says something about gun control, then lets it slide. Base kicking up? Mention the Wall, then do nothing. Syria howling in the press? Shoot a missile or two at an empty base, then do nothing. South African white genocide comes up? Tweet ‘someone should look into this,’ in effect, then ignore it thereafter.

        He seems to half-promise everything to everyone, then do none of it.

      • @Spahnranch 1969, When it was confirmed that trump didn’t wear a condom with stormy daniels, that illustrates that he has little to no foresight as to potential horrific consequences.

      • Trump has me still in an undecided state…He has not repealed Obama’s initiatives on community demographics (read GERRYMANDERING..look THAT term up, if you don’t know what it is..)
        Trump merely kicked the can down the road, only POSTPONING the program until 2020..Hmmmm..
        Are we being lulled into a comfort zone and drawn out into the open for a very near-future purge? We had best retain a level of extreme caution and watch our backs. I’ve got a bad gut feeling about all of this.
        We are living in a slow-motion “Camp of the Saints” scenario. We aren’t “winning”, as Trump likes to repeatedly echo himself about. In Kentucky recently he proudly stated the progress and statistics of the lowest BLACK, HISPANIC AND FEMALE unemployment figures in 60 years…what about the WHITE MALES that elected his ass? He stated NOTHING about us.
        and the white RINOS cheered….
        Trumps victory, (if real,)..was an escape valve for the armchair warriors. Just like watching a white boxer defeat a black opponent and vcariously feelng some false sense of collective achievement, when in reality nothing has changed for the better…its worse.
        Trumps victory ( not necessarily ours) is possibly a beta test…to see and assess exactly how many of us there are to be gotten rid of, WHO we are, WHERE we are, and ALL OUR VITAL INFORMATION (weaknesses, strengths, hopes, fears…)
        We’ve handed them, foolishly, all the intelligence that, in times past, would have to be earnestly sought and dug out by spies. We’ve saved them that hardship.
        God forgive and help us..

  4. @Jo Jo

    Every western nation pretends to be ‘democratic’ whilst denying the populace a say on real issues such as immigration, war involvement and foreign aid, among many other things. We get no more of a say on political issues than your average Muhammad in Saudi. Dems and Repubs want you to vote on token issues that nobody has an opinion about and ignore the important issues that many rightfully want in the public arena.
    We have no democracy. We have no say.

    • How does that saying go? There are none more enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free? Some colored guy at the bus station kept mumbling that to himself over and over.

      • That was Goethe that wrote and/or said that. It’s one of my favorite quotes.

        I also believe that the Voltaire quote about fools cannot free themselves from the chains they revere applies perfectly to dems and reps normies.

        • If you’re so smart why aren’t you starting a political party to hold the GOP’s feet to the fire? We need a third party to have some leverage.

  5. agree with the author – outcome is the only thing that matters, not words. Otherwise, it is the end of the USA and all white countries in the West then lose their Hector, destined to the same fate. The wall must be in action by the next election. It is so disheartening to walk the streets. You rarely see a hijab or burqa wearing female without a pram, often two in the pram, as well as a rugrat or two in tow. Demographics is destiny. In one short generation. If Trump fails this we are going to be minority and it will be open season on whites after that.

    • The truly astounding thing is the active complicity of our ‘leaders’, who evidently have absolutely no allegiance to race or country.

      • Those so-called leaders are paid around $100k a year to represent their constituents and govern in their best interests. But the “special interests” pay them ten to twenty times that amount NOT to!

  6. This is being allowed in order to increase the demand for “muh WALL”…don’t you see?
    Walls don’t keep things out near as much as they keep things IN. Think beyond the moment, future captains and generals…
    The federal government is bringing immigrants in on planes, so what will a wall do that a well-armed and staffed (and properly motivated) border patrol can’t? (That’s not rhetorical..there’s an answer to that question..btw)
    Why put up a wall between us and our future strategic ally? Southern guerrillas used Texas and Mexico as a DMZ and a source for resupply during the first Civil War. History does have a way of repeating itself, boys.
    The enemy is within the gates,…too late for a wall to be of any positive national good, in my opinion. The money would be put to better use by nationalizing the railroad system and making it the envy of the modern world. It would mean SUSTAINED jobs for American men, instead of “fake jobs” being proclaimed when its actually a one-time, outsourced “contract bid” deal to build a wall.
    Think about it..

    • Oh shut up.

      Is ol Cowboy Cliven Bundy posting ridiculous comments here? Is he mouthing off that the mass migrant invasion of millions of low IQ Mestizos and Orc Amerindians is really a good thing for America because these Hispanics supposedly have a better work ethic than us White Anglos?

      Never underestimate how stupid and retarded and just selfish American agribusiness patriotards are. F**** em.

      • Not the people, but the LAND, fool. My name is posted. Real name, not a pseudonym.
        You have tunnel vision. You also QUICKLY resort to name-calling and belligerrence. You do this without addressing a single point that was made, so YOU piss off, buddy.
        Hope your vision of Hadrian’s wall manifests for you. Walls are only as good as the men who build them. You’d better find your modern Hadrian fast.

      • He has the makings of a good point, y’know. We would come to curse that wall if it ever stands between us and the arming of a white insurgency against ZOG, and I could easily see that happening. We get our big, beautiful wall and the men guarding it wave all the shitskins through with a smile while shooting on sight anyone with pale skin who tries to cross it without a good enough reason.

  7. Trump basically had the mandate to lead a populist overhaul of this entire country right after his inauguration. The fact that he settled into being a cog in the machine indicates one of two things:

    1. He was always just a time-server, who just happened to know what buttons to push (nationalism) to get elected, but had no intention of acting on his alleged beliefs.

    2. He was/is well-intentioned, but lacks the imagination and/or courage to do much of anything. He settled into the office, found it that it can’t do much (at least not without sticking his neck out further than he’s willing to), and is now sitting there helpless, his good intentions in vain.

    Either way, he’s not going to do the job that needs doing, with a 99% certainty. There’s always the 1% chance that something will jar him out of his current impotence, nothing is totally certain in this world. But the odds are heavily in favor of his being nothing more than a Tweet-tossing footnote in the course of history.

    • I’m sorry, but maybe you are too hasty in wishing to dish our President, when he has had the ENTIRE Establishment against him from before day one… and yet, he has done so much already. Could it possibly be, that he has to remove the (((enemies))) of his administration, first… before he can attend to the things he said he would do? Or are you all wanting solutions yesterday, not realizing it took the DEMS almost 100 years to get to THIS point, before Trump came along? I see progress, I see people waking up, I see Dems being routed in the upcoming elections, and, (God willing) with a House and Senate under their control, THEN perhaps we might see what Trump can do? My 2cents.

  8. These caravans are the equivalent of “sappers”..ask a Viet Nam Veteran about them.
    Only these are of a socio-political/military type, but sappers nonetheless.

  9. A wall will settle state vs. federal issue forever, if built, and NOT in states’ rights favor, either. Federal property that crosses state lines implies JURISDICTION, people!!!
    Can we build a wall around just Texas? Now THAT, I would support, after a good cleansing!
    We also need to raise a Texas Naval Command out of Galveston to control the Southern Gulf.
    Reckon Vlad would sell us a Carrier and a few Subs on credit? Interest-free, of course..NO USURY. A trade-pact would suffice in lieu of any interest.

  10. A wall will decide state sovereignty vs. federal FOREVER,…and NOT in our favor.
    Federal property, i.e., a border wall, implies legal JURISDICTION!!!
    How about just a wall aroud Texas, (after a good cleansing)? Now, I might be in favor of that! Along with the establishment of the Texas Naval Command. Reckon Cousin Vlad might sell us a couple of carriers and three or four submarines on credit? Interest-free, of course..NO USURY! (…a trade-deal would suffice in lieu of any interest.)
    Think long-range…

  11. This issue with strong visuals of a walking dead walker horde marching to invade the United States – it’s a perfect propaganda issue. I encourage Identity Europa, League of the South to do demos in front of Honduran embassies.

    I’d also like to see some demos in front of Army basis in Southern States that are a big part of the economy but someone these US/Southern army troops never get called on to defend our country.

    I had an excellent back and forth conversation of a young, intelligent Congressional Staff member to the Oklahoma Republican who was quoted saying something unbelievable stupid like “He’d like to build the wall and secure our border, but there were more important things to do like national defense”. I asked his congressional staff member exactly what nation he was thinking about in his national defense because it certainly wasn’t the American nation.

      • I was one of those soldiers at one time. Staging protests outside military bases is the WRONG path, in my opinion. Organizing support groups for white military families that have been splintered and impoverished by the DOD and the federal government that has them contractually enslaved would be a much better use of resources and energy. And would get their support out of respect, not intimidation and fear. Save THAT approach for ANTIFA and their kind. You WILL NOT SCARE the cadre at Ft. Benning, son, you will create an enemy.

  12. Hadrians, the Roman wall on the border of Scotland worked great for hundreds of years, denoted the boundary of the Pax Romana – the Roman Peace. Inside was Roman civilization – outside barbarism.

    Walls work great for Syilcon Valley $ billionaires and Hollywood celebrities and Pop Music stars private estates – we have all kinds of walls, co-op doormen in Barak Obama’s former Chicago neighborhood.

    Good walls make for good neighbors.


    • Having their asses handed back to them on a plate would be the BEST deterrent to immigration. If the man on the wall isn’t willing to kill to defend it, or worse, is not ALLOWED to use deadly force to defend it, then it is just one more obstacle to the immigrant.
      Its never gonna get built anyway, so you might as well get over it and face reality ( and plan for it.) Better have a plan B. And quit being a smartass to your peers and elders.

    • The Wall would have great symbolic value, but in this age of constant global travel and commerce its practical value would be negligible. The only way it could work is if the US were to become a tightly restricted police state like the Zionist Entity. Look at the US – Mexican border as proposed by President Polk. That would solve the problem of illegal immigration with our inferior brown neighbors to the south.

  13. Are there any Which racial realists that live along the southern border?

    If so, would it be possible to put up images of the “evil eye ” (mal de ojo) on poles on the border? Also, since it’s Halloween, how about putting up a spread out display of La Chumpacabra that the hyper superstitious cholos and cholas fear. The best psyop would be wetback looking heads on pikes facing south.

    I know that I am throwing pasta against the wall so to speak to see what sticks, but doing something is better than just bitching and doing nothing.

    • Might work better than what Drumpf’s doing. But I’m afraid most of these dingbats are too busy hexing Kavanaugh.

  14. Trump reminds me of a mate I once-note once-had. I’ll help you move the fridge, I won’t sleep with your girlfriend, the cheques in the mail…..just tells ya what you want to hear.

    • @john That’s it exactly. My husband read that he had someone hired during the campaign who found out what people wanted to hear and he just incorporated that into his speeches and rallies. I’ve come to think Drumpf has no convictions whatsoever except for money.

      • @Gabby

        Exactly. If politicians can’t deliver or promise something, then they should just say they can’t. It may reflect better on them.

  15. Mr. Porter is right, what’s the use of a wall at this point?
    In a couple of decades or earlier hundreds of thousands maybe millions of wbite Americans will try to escape to the South.
    Many generations of Americans never experienced catastrophic situations, this will change.
    I think Anglo and Americans don’t realize how others (surely including Jews) hate them.

  16. I saw an excellent political advertisement by President Trump opposing this Hunduran Migrant invasion – and he used the Charles Lindberg slogan “Put America First” – this drives the jews crazy.

    This is the perfect issue for us – ugly mobs of dark swarthy migrant invaders form mobs marching to the border to invade our country.

    Let’s get active in your local areas an on traditional and social media. If you do this in your state, local campaigns you/we will win.

    Regular Whites are looking for some outlet to channel their frustrations and this is it.

    Don’t whine and complain that nobody including President Trump is doing anything about it – that’s just not true.

    • This only ends when someone takes a gun, goes down to the border, and shoots a few of them. Or drives a truck into a big crowd of them. Let them know that coming here could get them killed and maybe they won’t.

      For that matter, kill a few of Do-Nothing Jeff’s rich drinking buddies who keep hiring the motherfuckers and causing them to want to come here in the first place..


    ‘Jaye Ryan’ and his and James Edwards and everyone’s hatred of white women comes to fruition, as some black organization promoting the president’s agenda takes out an ad in defense of Arkansas Congressman French Hill warning against ‘white women lynching black men’ in wake of the Kavanaugh hearings.


    There are literally a few men in this movement. The rest are pathetic neurotics ‘bending the movement’ to their own personality-disordered aims.

    • And even though Hill has now repudiated the ad, most of the comments under that article express support. There is probably a wink, wink, nod, nod posture among the Republicans.

      So, where is Trevor Whoever, claiming I as an anglo woman have some ‘irrelevant’ agenda of defending anglo and white women from this epidemic, endemic hate of us?

      Are you people truly this challenged?

      No Apologies


    • “When a white girl screams rape.”

      I cannot wait to come down South and reconnect with the men who are going to lynch the likes of Jaye Ryan and his ilk, and laugh at the impotence of this brand of ‘Southern Nationalism.’

  18. Democrats on Twitter are actually contorting this ad as ‘racist and sexist’ against black women.

    I think they need to join up with Matt Parrott, who around 2014 or 2015 agreed with some black nationalist radio host that ‘black women have it the worst.’

    Black women call for the mass rape of southern white women by hiding behind Kavanaugh and Trump but somehow, they are being oppressed.

    That disgusting irish polak camel jockeying catholic Colin Flaherty was egging these types on during the Kavanaugh confirmation on Twitter, while trying to sell tickets to ‘white girls bleeding a lot.’

    Disgusting, but good for the healthy people to see how united the Democrats and Republicans are in their lust to genocide the angloceltic race, starting with our girls and women.

    • Flaherty’s book only featured one ‘chapter’ on rape by black men – of hispanic females – even though his title advertises ‘white girl bleeds a lot.’

      Disgusting, this frenzied mob of anglo-female-raping filth.

      I’ll also add that Ann Coulter is half catholic, I think on her father’s side, as is Laura Ingraham (her mother’s though, who was polish) which accounts for some of the immunity both women have enjoyed (both were suburban Connecticut-raised and sheltered) and for the misogyny both exhibit.

      Neither would have fit that evilwhiteywasp look quite enough to encounter the rage it elicits all over the US, even if they hadn’t lived such lives of privilege…that ‘WASP’ look one sees all over the South that the jews spent decades stigmatizing throughout american culture.

      Both parties call for the rape and torture of the Southern and anglo woman.

      And their message is fully endorsed by Brad Griffin and Co.

  19. Jaye Ryan is 75% irish catholic and 25% russian whatever, although in the last couple years he began insisting on calling himself an ‘anglo.’

    He is not. I have no idea what emotional problems possess James Edwards but consider it tragic for the Southern people that he purports to represent them to the world.

    • That’s right Genie, stir up pro-Whites against pro-Whites. What a winning strategy. Anti-Whites couldn’t do a better job of it.

      • @more of the same I’ve noticed that a lot of these protestants, pagans, and atheists attack White Catholics more than they do the enemy. Seriously, what is wrong with them? We are facing genocide and these quacks are getting riled up because someone is Catholic. Well, Catholics were the ones who stood up to both muslims and jews for centuries. And by the way, Genie, it was a Catholic monarch in England, Edward I, who kicked the jews out, and a protestant, Oliver Cromwell, who brought them back in. Jews financed Cromwell to destroy Catholics in England. England existed just fine for about 400 years without jews.

        • It’s well past time to put aside our differences and stand together. We ALL have a common enemy who wants to wipe ALL of us off the planet FOREVER.

          • @more of the same I absolutely agree, it’s time to support Whites regardless, we have to stand together. I personally don’t care if someone worships God, Odin, or has no religious faith at all as long as they support our White race. I only hope some of these other people get the message before much longer.

        • Edward I wasn’t a ‘Catholic’ in any sense that opposed Protestantism, since it didn’t exist. Whether he was part of a precursor strain of Protestantism is up for debate; English barons made the early rumblings of Protestant revolt generally.

          Besides, all Edward did is replace Jewish usurers with Italian ones like the Riccardi family. Who knows how much jew was in some of these italian financiers, or how much the crypto jews in England just took over.

          It’s a non sequitur, moot point.

          And stating the truth about Jaye Ryan isn’t ‘dividing’ whites. It’s refusing to allow the anglo identity and experience to be appropriated by anyone. If you have a problem with that, you just hate anglos.

          The only real difference between Roman Catholicism and Protestantism is the latter purges the former of corruption and exploitation. The only reason to cling to Roman Catholicism is because you want to exploit Protestants or germanics.

          • What an ass you are, and you prove my point about prods, they would choose jews, muslims, or blacks over White Catholics. Useless.

          • @more of the same

            Most black americans are part anglo. So what’s your point?

            @Gabby Mouse

            Denying reality – that your cult rapes children and women (and destroys the middle class) – won’t make it go away. The Caliphate Church *is* jewish and muslim, no need to be repetitive.

          • El Genie, you’re only proving how absolutely moronic you are. I take it you’re one of Hagee’s disciples.

          • And before one of you idiots tries to fabricate about me, enough people on here have seen pictures of me and 100% verification of my identity to know I’m 100% native northwestern european.

          • Fuck you, el Genie, you miserable prods killed more ‘witches’ than Catholics ever did. And hanged them, remember the witch trials in Salem? Not a fucking Catholic in sight. And your prod ministers are just as likely to diddle little boys as priests are. I’ve come to the conclusion that most protestants are just jews turned inside out.

          • Your proof for this assertion that ‘protestant ministers are as likely to diddle little boys (and girls) as priests?’

            Really, I’d like to see evidence for this insanity.

            BTW the Salem Witch Trials are famous because they represented an aberration for Protestantism, as opposed to the norm for Catholicism.

            Show me a city where Roman Catholic clergy abuses were rampant that wasn’t controlled by Roman Catholic cops and I’ll show you a bridge in Italy that was repaired the…first…I mean second…uh third time….?

            Your are filth.

          • El Genie, you’re so pathetically stupid that I’m just going to pretend you don’t exist. Keep kiss those jew asses, though, you’re lips aren’t brown enough yet.

    • Genie, go back to your village. They miss their resident idiot.

      Or you can hide under a bridge, and scare children as they cross.

      No one on this site takes your obscurantist comments seriously. You’re obviously an agent provocateur for (((the tribe))) posing as a Southern Pro-White Patriots.

  20. You mean, the pedophile party (see dennis hastert) can’t stop an invasion of our country.? You mean, the holocaust wailers are helping the whineorities.? You mean, when military spending is proportional, blacks and hispanics run a 800 billion dollar budget deficit every year when they are 30% of our population. (Google fiscal impacts of whites, blacks, and hispanics.)
    Ill go over some sanctuary law, some bills that have not been implemented, “refugees”, and wall solutions.
    No legal right of sanctuary exists within the United States. Sanctuary is not recognized by common or statutory law. So now we have “free speech and law-free zones.” “The Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued a legal opinion, rejecting sanctuary as a legal right in the United States under federal, state, or common law.” Sanctuary participants who knowingly harbor an illegal alien could violate 8 U.S.C. § 1324. In U.S. v. Costello the 7th circuit discussed the scope and stated that ” 8 U.S.C. §1324 (a)(1)(A)(iii), which provides that anyone who knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the U.S. in violation of law, conceals, harbors or shields from detection [or attempts to do any of these things], such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation,” is punishable by a prison term and a fine.” The court also reasoned that harboring is “deliberately safeguarding members of a specified group from authorities” and in the immigration setting, meant ” materially to assist an alien to remain illegally in the U.S. without publicly advertising his presence but without needing or bother to conceal it.” This also could include those who publicly advertise, i.e. a Church.
    The power to regulate immigration resides exclusively with the federal government and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution “bars or preempts state and local governments from taking serious actions that frustrate federal laws and regulatory schemes established in relation to immigration.” The Supreme Court has also consistently stated that the need to have uniformity in immigration is best accomplished by maintaining the federal government’s exclusive control over immigration. Put even simpler, the Supreme Court has held that the federal government must have control over immigration law. Sanctuary policies which restrict the exchange of information regarding a person’s immigration status between the federal and state/local government on their face violate the Immigration Reform Act and Welfare Reform Act.

    (a) IN GENERAL —Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, a Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, OR IN ANY WAY RESTRICT , any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual.
    (b) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENT ENTITIES .—Not-withstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, no person or agency may prohibit, or in any way restrict, a Federal, State, or local government entity from doing any of the following with respect to information regarding the immigration status, law- ful or unlawful, of any individual: (1) Sending such information to, or requesting or receiving such information from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service. (2) Maintaining such information. (3) Exchanging such information with any other Federal, State, or local government entity.
    (c) OBLIGATION TO RESPOND TO INQUIRIES .—The Immigration and Naturalization Service shall respond to an inquiry by a Federal, State, or local government agency, seeking to verify or ascertain the citizenship or immigration status of any individual within the jurisdiction of the agency for any purpose authorized by law, by providing the requested verification or status information.

    SEC. 434 (Welfare Reform Act). COMMUNICATION BETWEEN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, no State or local government entity may be prohibited, or in any way restricted, from sending to or receiving from the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of an alien in the United States.
    *A local policy that prohibits or restricts officials and employees from sharing immigration information with federal authorities will likely conflict with 642 and 434 and thus would be a nullity. So, sanctuary policies that obstruct the “Accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress” in the field of immigration law may be preempted by federal law.
    If they want to require non-dissemination of immigration information for minors who are arrested for felony crimes, it would also be preempted.
    If they have “Don’t Tell”, federal law bars the city from preventing voluntary dissemination of immigrant status information. In the Second Circuit in New York, the Court struck down an executive order which prohibited New York City employees from voluntarily reporting immigration information to federal officials. “In ruling against the city’s Tenth Amendment claim, the court held that the city did not have the untrammeled right to forbid all voluntary cooperation by state or local officials with particular federal programs.” The court also outlined how the city would have to present evidence on how its illegal juvenile non-reporting policy is integral to the operation of the government. So, despite New York losing on a constitutional challenge, they are still recognized as a sanctuary city.

    BILLS>*So, the Republicans, despite having majorities everywhere, apparently have not authorized an across-the-board stripping of federal dollars from state and local governments that do not fully comply to the full extent of the federal governments immigration enforcement programs. “The House passed H.R. 3009 on July 23, 2015. That bill would have penalized states and localities that restrict information gathering or communication with federal immigration enforcement agencies regarding an individual’s citizenship or immigration status by withholding funding for three Department of Justice grant programs.”
    “2016 ( H.R. 2578) would have prohibited federal funds from going to jurisdictions that restrict their law enforcement agents from notifying ICE on the immigration status of aliens.” ”
    S. 3100 and S. 2193, would have restricted federal funding to cities that decline to honor detainers; and increase penalties (i.e., prison sentence) for migrants who illegally renter.” Sessions: The Interior Enforcement Order failed to even define “Sanctuary” jurisdictions . Clear Act, which states that federal funds will be reallocated only upon the dismissal of any sanctuary policy currently in place.

    WALL> tax the remittances, raise bridge costs, raise visa costs, new active land mines, cut foreign aid, el chapo act, etc.

    “Refugees”> 8 usca 1157> Trump and number 2) Except as provided in subsection (b), the number of refugees who may be admitted under this section in any fiscal year after fiscal year 1982 shall be such number as the President determines, before the beginning of the fiscal year and after appropriate consultation, is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest. So, in regards to both sanctuary cities and this, they are either incompetent or just trying to essentially say well I tried.. kind of. See also 1980 refugee act.

    Under this provision of the INA, the President also has the authority to determine how that total should be allocated among the various refugees fleeing conflicts and disasters around the world, thus giving the President important authority to express his preferences regarding who should enter, whether those preferences are motivated by foreign policy or domestic political concerns.
    A putative refugee must demonstrate not only that their STATE of origin intends to harm them seriously without cause, but that the harm is due to their status/identity. The statute says “persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion.” So, i would argue, that a country can be exceedingly dangerous and perilous for humans beings and it still wouldnt qualify the people leaving that country as refugees under US law. Moreover, in the Convention’s definition of refugee, it requires the applicant to show that they fear persecution and are unable to avail themselves of the protection in their state of origin. So, being that not everywhere in Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Congo, Somalia, and Iran are warzones, i would further argue that almost of these people are not refugees. Many have passed through numerous other countries also. Anyway, refugee status is not to be extended to every alien displaced by conditions of unrest or violence in their home country. I hereby proclaim, pursuant to sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), that the unrestricted entry into the United States of nationals of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.
    Anyway, I would also argue that since almost all of these people were not “refugees” at the time that they were admitted, that most of them should be deported. The refugee status of any alien admitted to the US may be terminated if it is determined the alien was not a refugee. The USCIS may terminate the refugee status of any refugee, and their spouses and children, if it is found that the person was not in fact a refugee at the time of admission. Again, STATE has to target them, which is not happening for most of these places, they can’t avail themselves to the state, again most have places that are not war zones.

Comments are closed.