I’m genuinely interested in this stuff.
The finding “my authentic self” bit is pure Modernism.
“Elliot Page, the Oscar-nominated star of “Juno,” announced on Tuesday that he is transgender.
“Hi friends, I want to share with you that I am trans, my pronouns are he/they and my name is Elliot,” Page, who as Ellen Page starred in several critically acclaimed films, wrote in a statement that he posted on Twitter and Instagram. “I feel lucky to be writing this. To be here. To have arrived at this place in my life.”
Page, a 33-year-old Canadian actor and producer, is also known for roles in the movies “X-Men: The Last Stand,” “X-Men: Days of Future Past” and “Inception,” as well as the recent Netflix series “Umbrella Academy.” Page debuted as a director last year with the documentary “There’s Something in the Water.”
“I can’t begin to express how remarkable it feels to finally love who I am enough to pursue my authentic self,” Page, who married the choreographer Emma Portner in 2018, went on. …”
I’m more interested in why these people have won the culture war and why mainstream conservatism is so flaccid and unpopular that it keeps losing to them though.
How is it most of these gender-bending degenerates somehow occupy both (or all) genders while doing NONE of them well. It’s as if being “trans” is license to live out a flamboyant display of repulsiveness.
>>> why these people have won the culture war
Because they control the Mass Electronic Media.
No one would have heard of any of these people, nor “transgenderism,” if they didn’t broadcast them on the Internet, TV, Cinema, Radio, and even newspapers, like the New York Times quoted here.
It’s an extremely simple explanation, which is why people aren’t satisfied with the answer.
Note that 99% of what bloggers do is to comment on whatever gets broadcast on the Mass Electronic Media, because that is the only shared culture we have.
I am, oh, so glad I do not have Justin Trudeau for a neighbour, because if I did…
You have more in common with Trudeau than your neighbors do. He spells it “neighbour” too, whereas your neighbors, assuming you actually live in America, don’t.
Personally, I think that transsexuals such as Ellen Page are mentally ill, but that said, social liberalism won the culture war over social conservatism because it touches White people’s hearts much more strongly than social conservatism, which is unnecessarily restrictive, and in many cases, outright oppressive. Whites like their individual freedom, including the individual freedom to do weird things like identify as the opposite sex. Restricting sexuality is dumb at best, immoral at worst. Long live social liberalism.
There isn’t a single example of a society in Europe and Aryan controlled lands like India prior to the French Revolution that practiced total liberalism and didn’t restrict sexuality (see the Germanic tribes hunting down and killing homosexuals, Ancient India having violent punishments for homosexuals, a Roman emperor getting assassinated for being a tranny). Such societies were far more fertile with a will to not just survive but conquer than Murica or Achmendland (Britain). None of the foundations of Europe are liberalism considering the actual behavior of societies like the the Norse, Romans, Celts, etc.
Even today, the societies with the strongest will to live rather than just coom and watch superheroes until dying alone surrounded by pets are places like Timor Leste and Pakistan.
Aldon,
1. The Roman Empire during the height of its glory had emperors like Caligula and Nero who were sexual degenerates by Alt Right Puritan standards. Sexual degeneracy was present in Rome for about two centuries before the empire started coming undone after 180 AD. If you consider Rome to be an Aryan success story, which I do, then the Roman Empire belies your argument that our races always restricts sexuality.
2. In the case of the Germanic tribes and Aryan India circa 1500 BC, don’t you think there is a difference between going after homos vs. forcing their own White women to stay a virgin before marriage and never have sex with any other man except her husband? As is so often the case with Puritans, you’re using the gag factor of homosexuality as a cover for your real agenda, which is restricting White female sexuality and forcing them to only be allowed to have sex with their husbands.
Uh huh, and do any of them enjoy 21st century living standards, technological advancements, and comfort? Didn’t think so. I’ll take Modern Liberalism and its materially superior way of life
Buddy, things have changed over the last 500 years. The Magna Carta was formalized way back in 1217 and arguably serves as the foundation of Liberalism, at least in Britain. The Renaissance took place in the 1400s, the Enlightenment in the late 1600s and 1700s. The White Race has been trending towards Liberalism for centuries now. We are a different people than we were centuries ago. Why resist the inevitable? Why struggle in vain against it?
>holds up Pakistan as an example of a virile culture worth emulating
We’re done here. Go back to your shithole, One Struggler. You don’t get to sexually abuse our White Women.
>The Roman Empire during the height of its glory had emperors like Caligula and Nero who were sexual degenerates by Alt Right Puritan standards.
Both of which were either assassinated or deposed in a coup.
>Sexual degeneracy was present in Rome for about two centuries before the empire started coming undone after 180 AD.
The Roman’s society already degenerated by the empire’s peak.
>If you consider Rome to be an Aryan success story, which I do, then the Roman Empire belies your argument that our races always restricts sexuality.
Go show me all the accepted trannies and gay marriages. Or women refusing to be with a husband and producing offspring to carry lineages being respected when not a Vestal Virgin.
>In the case of the Germanic tribes and Aryan India circa 1500 BC, don’t you think there is a difference between going after homos vs. forcing their own White women to stay a virgin before marriage and never have sex with any other man except her husband?
>As is so often the case with Puritans, you’re using the gag factor of homosexuality as a cover for your real agenda, which is restricting White female sexuality and forcing them to only be allowed to have sex with their husbands.
Yeah? Tell us all the notable civilizations that didn’t enforce monogamy (with at most only the likes of chieftains or kings being allowed to take more than one woman) which weren’t Muslim.
>Uh huh, and do any of them enjoy 21st century living standards, technological advancements, and comfort? Didn’t think so. I’ll take Modern Liberalism and its materially superior way of life
You and other cucks aren’t tranquil considering how it’s so easy to get you out rioting over some Nigger criminal. Merely distracted through toys and cooming.
>Buddy, things have changed over the last 500 years. The Magna Carta was formalized way back in 1217 and arguably serves as the foundation of Liberalism, at least in Britain.
Nope. The Magna Carta made no assertions of “men being equals” and never denied the importance of hierarchy and blood.
>The Renaissance took place in the 1400s
Okay Whig. Show me all the Renaissance writers fighting for trannies or for Nigs as citizens.
>the Enlightenment in the late 1600s and 1700s
The Enlightenment is shit. And?
>The White Race has been trending towards Liberalism for centuries now. We are a different people than we were centuries ago. Why resist the inevitable? Why struggle in vain against it?
You can fight GNON all you want. GNON wins. Already liberalism’s men are seeing their societies getting filled with outsiders while there women’s wombs are empty or filled with shitskins. Either they just don’t care or are knowingly working against their heritage.
>We’re done here. Go back to your shithole, One Struggler. You don’t get to sexually abuse our White Women.
You’re mulatto grandchild will never be White.
Your argument is that sexual degeneracy leads to the decline of Empire. It does not, for if it did, then Rome would have collapsed during the reigns of Caligula and Nero, as opposed to 415 AD when it was sacked, and 486 AD when it finally dissolved. Sexual degeneracy can and does co-exist with a stable, 1st world civilization. Rome is proof of this. The fact that Nero and Caligula were deposed is irrelevant, because their degenerate reign did not result in Rome falling. Nero even burned Jerusalam to the ground in 70 AD. Imagine that, a sexual libertine waging war on the Jews. Its almost like Aryans can get away with engaging in promiscuity whole still conquering the world..
It may have morally degenerated, but so what? Sexual and moral degeneracy doesn’t matter.
You do know that Rome had a reputation for being the sex capital of the world, right? Julia the Elder, daughter of Augustus Caesar, was a more common archetype than you’re willing to admit. Elite Roman women engaged in trysts with slaves. Brothels and public bathhouses were common, as were orgys during annual festivals, particularly ones celebrating the goddess Venus.
If we we’re discussing the Roman Republic, which dissolved between 44 BC and 27 BC and henceforth became the Roman Empire, then sure, you could point to examples of sexual restriction, but the Roman Republic is not the mighty Rome we all remember. That would be the Empire, and sexual promiscuity was common place in the Empire. This did not lead to its collapse.
The United States of America. The fears of social conservatives that America itself would collapse due to sexual degeneracy never came to fruition. It sucks for them that they don’t like America’s permissive culture, but the fact is, we liberated ourselves from sexual restrictions back in the 1960s, and, if you’ve been following Hunter’s series on Modernism, the 1920s. Last I checked, America is humming along.
I’m a White Nationalist who is also a Modernist, a Social Liberal, and a supporter of Feminism and the Sexual Revolution. I believe these have been good things for the White Race, and that those who have gotten left behind by Modernism need to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century. It is my goal to break the connection between Pro-White activism and Traditionalism, the latter of which is not fit for 1st world countries and 1st world peoples, and belongs in shitholes like Pakistan.
You’re the one who claimed that “None of the foundations of Europe are liberalism,” but in fact, I can find Liberal foundations stretching back hundreds of years. The Magna Carta was a Liberal document for its time. Likewise the Declaration of Independence in 1776. Liberalism was developed in Aryan soil and took root in the hearts of Whites.
Again, you’re the one arguing for the slippery slope fallacy, not me. The onus is on YOU to free your mind of such fallacious thinking. I don’t believe in the slippery slope fallacy. I don’t think the Renaissance inevitably led to butt sex or to equality for negroes. What I’m arguing is that we can indeed embrace Liberalism while also drawing a line in the sand when things go to far, like they have with transsexuals and homosexuals. You’re the who who denies this, not me.
Again, slippery slope fallacy. No matter how desperately you want to believe it, Voltaire did not lead to butt sex. Nor did Isaac Newton and Galileo.
Lol. There’s nothing in Nature’s Law that says sexual promiscuity is a bad thing.
And yet, most White Nationalists started off as Liberals or Leftists. Its almost like Whites can and will eventually figure out that we are under attack, and that the answer is racial separation. We do not need to get rid of Liberalism in order to save ourselves. Liberalism *is* Aryan culture, and has been for about 250 years. Liberalism is the ideology that secures us our individual rights, freedoms, and comforts. We are not obliged to extend this to non-whites out of some autistic obsession with “intellectual consistency.”
You have to go back. We don’t want an alliance with you. Once a Mud, always a Mud. Your people are ugly, impulsive, and offer nothing to White Nationalism or to the 14 words.
>Your argument is that sexual degeneracy leads to the decline of Empire. It does not, for if it did, then Rome would have collapsed during the reigns of Caligula and Nero, as opposed to 415 AD when it was sacked, and 486 AD when it finally dissolved. Sexual degeneracy can and does co-exist with a stable, 1st world civilization. Rome is proof of this. The fact that Nero and Caligula were deposed is irrelevant, because their degenerate reign did not result in Rome falling. Nero even burned Jerusalam to the ground in 70 AD. Imagine that, a sexual libertine waging war on the Jews. Its almost like Aryans can get away with engaging in promiscuity whole still conquering the world..
Yawn. The Romans’ society already poisoned itself by Caesar’s time and never got cured of it. At best, it was delayed.
>It may have morally degenerated, but so what? Sexual and moral degeneracy doesn’t matter.
The widespread state of Globohomo points otherwise. Or history.
>You do know that Rome had a reputation for being the sex capital of the world, right? Julia the Elder, daughter of Augustus Caesar, was a more common archetype than you’re willing to admit. Elite Roman women engaged in trysts with slaves. Brothels and public bathhouses were common, as were orgys during annual festivals, particularly ones celebrating the goddess Venus.
All that babble and you still can’t show the women’s behavior was acceptable and not punished if caught by their patriarchs. Prostitutes were never high-status.
>If we we’re discussing the Roman Republic, which dissolved between 44 BC and 27 BC and henceforth became the Roman Empire, then sure, you could point to examples of sexual restriction, but the Roman Republic is not the mighty Rome we all remember. That would be the Empire, and sexual promiscuity was common place in the Empire. This did not lead to its collapse.
The Roman Republic already did the bulk of Roman conquests.
>The United States of America. The fears of social conservatives that America itself would collapse due to sexual degeneracy never came to fruition. It sucks for them that they don’t like America’s permissive culture, but the fact is, we liberated ourselves from sexual restrictions back in the 1960s, and, if you’ve been following Hunter’s series on Modernism, the 1920s. Last I checked, America is humming along.
56% White and dropping once the Boomers are gone. Far fewer White women are married than a century ago. Divorce industry. Better yet:
http://blog.jim.com/culture/marriage/
Birthrates, cuck.
>I’m a White Nationalist who is also a Modernist, a Social Liberal, and a supporter of Feminism and the Sexual Revolution. I believe these have been good things for the White Race, and that those who have gotten left behind by Modernism need to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century. It is my goal to break the connection between Pro-White activism and Traditionalism, the latter of which is not fit for 1st world countries and 1st world peoples, and belongs in shitholes like Pakistan.
Those shitholes are breeding at replacement level.
>You’re the one who claimed that “None of the foundations of Europe are liberalism,” but in fact, I can find Liberal foundations stretching back hundreds of years. The Magna Carta was a Liberal document for its time. Likewise the Declaration of Independence in 1776. Liberalism was developed in Aryan soil and took root in the hearts of Whites.
Again, none of the foundations. I’m talking all the way into the Neolithic. And liberalism depends on notions like the “individual” which were absent in cultures like in Ancient Greece.
>Again, you’re the one arguing for the slippery slope fallacy, not me. The onus is on YOU to free your mind of such fallacious thinking. I don’t believe in the slippery slope fallacy. I don’t think the Renaissance inevitably led to butt sex or to equality for negroes. What I’m arguing is that we can indeed embrace Liberalism while also drawing a line in the sand when things go to far, like they have with transsexuals and homosexuals. You’re the who who denies this, not me.
Muh slippery slope is a meme. In Actualworld, if you accept select premises (like that of “consent”) then it’s no surprise that you’re expected to advocate for where these premises lead to.
>Again, slippery slope fallacy. No matter how desperately you want to believe it, Voltaire did not lead to butt sex. Nor did Isaac Newton and Galileo.
Lay off the Richard Dawkins.
>Lol. There’s nothing in Nature’s Law that says sexual promiscuity is a bad thing.
Traditional societies/Societies that actually breed at replacement level regulate sexuality for women and also men. It’s been noticed that the absence of enforced monogamy combined with Globohomo filling in as the biggest pimp men largely and continuously either drop-out openly or sneakily, go simp/coomer, go homo/tranny, become ultraviolent since they’re either desperate or have no stake in society from how they aren’t able to secure a woman with children.
All women are treacherous sluts absent of shaming and violence. Women act how they do today since they can sense that they can depend on law enforcement for protection from dangerous males instead of a husband or brother, depend on makework and gibs and divorce instead of a single man or their immediate community for resources to feed themselves/children, don’t have to deal with getting shamed by their immediate community or beaten by their husbands/fathers for degenerate behavior.
How about you tell us how come so many societies post-Paleolithic enforced monogamy
>And yet, most White Nationalists started off as Liberals or Leftists. Its almost like Whites can and will eventually figure out that we are under attack, and that the answer is racial separation. We do not need to get rid of Liberalism in order to save ourselves. Liberalism *is* Aryan culture, and has been for about 250 years. Liberalism is the ideology that secures us our individual rights, freedoms, and comforts. We are not obliged to extend this to non-whites out of some autistic obsession with “intellectual consistency.”
>I don’t care if thousands of years of my predecessors did otherwise.
As expected from a Leftist.
Meet Crspr Cas9. China will eliminate the gays via gene editing.
I’ve wondered about such a thing. If, say, homosexuality were discovered to be caused by a gene that could be excised in vitro from a zygote, which could then be planted in the mother’s womb, there to develop heterosexually, would liberals quickly propose law that would prevent the screening for said gene? Would such screening be deemed unconstitutional and thus prohibited (maybe to develop as a black-market enterprise)?
About twenty years ago now, I put a question on that subject to a number of friends and relatives. The setup was something like the following: I’d say imagine a future in which various traits or defects can be identified in the genome of your offspring and removed before the zygote is placed in the womb (of you or your wife). Let’s say the doctor can read off to you the traits or defects that have been spotted and, one by one, ask whether you’d like them removed. Would you request removal of the following …
At that point, I’d start listing things, some of them innocuous maybe, such as freckles, others terrible, such as multiple sclerosis, and wait for a yes or no after each.
When I’d gone through four or five things, I’d say, as if it were just another item on the list, homosexuality. In just about every case, the person whom I’d led down the path would freeze. To me, it was obvious the persons were torn between a natural inclination to say yes and recent-cultural-pressure not to.
One Chinese girl, studying law in America, said something I remember. After she’d said one or two words that indicated that she recognized the question was politically loaded, she said she’d have the homosexuality removed, that she wouldn’t want it there. “Not for my child,” she said gently.
The Chinese will use it like the rational folk that they are.
I have some other ideas which it would be useful for….
@DP84,
Would you be interested in a date, or perhaps a sexual tryst with Lady MAGA? Don’t be a transphobic.
“long live social liberalism.”
They’re losing because they’re winning (as we know their job is to lose, they co-opted MAGA for now & W.N.’s made big tent mistake imo). Because we are pussies, myself included. In a sane world we would be psyching each other up out of Soybean brains in vats mania to Julius Septimus Severus’ing & Hadrian-ing these wretches and clean house, clean streets. Parade the wretches just like Stalin paraded the German heroes in Moscow he captured in Operation Bagration, washing the street after the POW’s walked through.
The modern conservative is a pure masochist. Oftentimes quite “successful,” but who naturally rises up comfy in this social order? People like my Boomer parents, so if it makes me a “loser” I didn’t want to be like them or 95ish% of my classmates’ boomer parents who were just like them (once I saw a hint of what they’re really about) & I “failed” to match or eclipse their “success” then so be it. Very well. But what Aryan racialists have in front of us is the damn world for the taking. Linder is correct, we are too personality/ego obsessed rather than ideas/principles obsessed. C’mon, we are the best of the best Aryans left in the open air asylum known as America, and it’s damn disappointing. We’ve all at very least begun to overcome the most intense dystopian “cradle to grave” socioengineering project in all of human history. I do salute y’all regardless of whether you dislike me.
This is an age where we can forge new Achilles, new Hermann/Arminius’s. An entire new vision for the future. Too few of us have yet progressed as mere keyboard warriors like I am being right now to graduate into seriousness. The latest TRS (who I rarely visit if you’re possibly stuck in “omg he clicked this site FED” thing, not that there’s no understandable underlying sentiment that that reflects) episode brought up a very important point that Linder is spot on about even though it hurts but it’s what we all need to hear over & over while encouraging each other to strive for better, myself included. Jews are a damn serious tribe, and there are waaaaay too few Aryan Americans – I include myself – who are just…not. Not serious enough. Enoch & Striker talk about how there is a faction of Jews who have supposedly thrown up their hands and decided to try to convince the entire tribe to pre-emptively co-opt real racialism.
The Jew Erich Kaufmann wrote a pretty recent book called “Whiteshift” where he studies us very coldly as though we are literal lab rats without letting his emotions blind him, seeing what is actually there to be seen, and soberly planning to short & long term annihilate us like clowns like we usually wind up as since we are a “movement” who breaks silence to preache “keep it kosher” embrace teh chains that bind y’all and a “movement” who denounce automatically without hesitation or investigation any rogue (per racialist culture) Aryan racialist who does pranks.,…our own comrades who are far braver however “foolish” their actions were. The problem is there are not nearly enough of such selfless individuals yet, warriors, and there are not nearly enough yet because who wants to join a cause that suffers endless blows by it’s enemies and never delivers them, and goes the extra mile to break silence to denounce such individuals? That’s why normies want no part of racialism in America.
Meanwhile, as Jews like Kaufmann study us as though we are literal lab rats and works with his extensive hyper-organized tribal network which is practicing eugenics (for whatever that’s worth, they aren’t dysgenic) and has several genocides of Aryan civilizations under it’s belt, we are worrying about making petitions to Washington D.C. in some vague future rather than doing what any sane group of Aryan men would do, raze it to the ground, burn it, and salt it’s festering polluted grounds like our ancestors who still gave a damn about their offspring the Romans did to Carthage. A few years ago I still had gay mentalities all of us have had installed as malware into our subconscious minds (not our fault, but it is our responsibility to replace it) and thought maybe the Romans had gone “too far.” Ohhhh…..no, they didn’t go far enough.
We can be nice “peace loving” fags after we clean up this mess, and nothing’s going to improve until we dispense with pacifism & petitioning mentalities. I’ve said it many times & things just need repeating – this is a call for help btw, you matter, you’re in the apparent climax of the most intense war of wars that’s been raging for over 2,000 years & you can make a decisive difference instead of be rightly cursed like many of us curse our recent ancestors- at very least please don’t countersignal a warrior culture & don’t reinforce the “keep it kosher” taboos still insanely popular. Don’t want the heat, well I’m pretty sure no one really does…there’s just no way to avoid it, our recent ancestors were weak. We don’t have to continue to be.
Life involves screw ups. Mistakes. Genuine perfectionism is gay. Give yourself and your fellow explicit Aryan racialist man a break when possible. Ever notice how it seems we are quick to get mad at each other like crabs in a bucket but rarely get mad at Jews with even half the same intensity? Because we know we could all be much better than this. Besides maybe doing decentralized campaigns promoted online that volunteer anon’s are to do on a pre-agreed upon date as individuals but “united in spirit” to minimize the usual problems with organizing racially (at least so long as pacifism & petitioning our executioners remain popular mentalities) – I’m sure it won’t be popular, but 1 idea is on day X volunteers Romulus a brand spankin new Patriarchy individually solo unless they’re very confident they know someone they can trust & even more powerfully than was Unite The Right 2017 force the stinking rotten genocidal system that openly comes after our kids now into responding in a Double Bind like they constantly force us in. Heads we win, tails they lose.
If men would just shake off their mangina tendencies and remember how the Aryan village of mudhuts that conquered the world (Rome) was founded upon a very brutal act which was a founding myth/foundation of it, man things would improve big time. Ever hear of the Sabines? Does that invalidate the grandeur of Rome that during it’s peak made the Confederacy look like a rather primitive civilization of SJW’s? Where is our desire for glory? To be remembered? Not 10 years after we return to the Earth but 1,000 years? We live in such an age with such an opportunity. We are our own barrier, myself included. Writing essays is better than nothing, as is going on the street and speaking; but we are at war. Some of us are going to get busted on trumped up charges. Some of us are going to quit. Some of us are going to get killed (I got a walk through monkey town, my fault for still being where I’m at, I’ve been robbed by niggers at gunpoint who held me hostage whether you believe it or not – after pistol whipping me & jacking my sheyeeeit when I was 17, they demanded I say “I am a bitch ass white boy, I ain’t shit”…even in the rural areas it might not be for 10 years but if they were able to Cheka the largest land country in the world Russia then they definitely can do it to America). Some of us are going to disappoint comrades.
But some of us are going to become legends. We all have potential for greatness within us – if we step up & encourage each other while also balancing to become more firm & call a spade a spade & not bullshit ourselves – remember Weimar Germany? A people that had been plundered, degraded, ritualistically humiliated to the point they burned their worthless paper rectangles $ to stay warm. All their womenfolk were for sale as the men stood back with their hands in their pockets (at least the men in Berlin). Homeless bum’s like I see every damn day everywhere, muttering aloud rambling at invisible voices in the streets quite literally driven insane as people walk by apathetically, and in utter despair.
The parallels are striking, but it’s not a perfect comparison as you know. Still, within a few years after Hitler came to power (the year before he became chancellor…what…+200,000 Germans had committed suicide? IN ONE YEAR! Out of about 70 million people) the streets got cleaned up. Homelessness became a thing of the past (for a while…we must denounce the actions of our grandfathers who went along to slaughter the Germans in the Hellstorm & rehabilitate Hitler, regardless as to how much it may hurt, & be willing to look deeper, to “The Darkening Age” as Cynthia Nixey wrote about), a dying defeated population largely afflicted by Stockholm’s Syndrome like us who had a near-total moral collapse into treason, degeneracy, drugs, whoring, all of it…and look at what they accomplished! Look at how a vanquished nation got healthy. But they fought for it. That is key. So what, we aren’t first & foremost individualists (at least not most of us). Keep changing the culture forward. Shun the optics cucks. They’ll submit since they’re apparently hopelessly spineless at present. Many of them can be redeemed down the road, with some help. Some can’t. It’s life. Take care!
The Alt-Right’s flirtations with N.S. were what drew the interest before Trump.
Fascinating post full of harrowing truths. Most important observation: normies want no part of “racialism” in America.
Many in this sphere seem to not grasp that.
Whites lose until normies embrace “racialism”.
So does it happen when we become hopelessly mongrelized like Latin America?
This society is evil and deranged.
>I’m more interested in why these people have won the culture war and why mainstream conservatism is so flaccid and unpopular that it keeps losing to them though.
Easy. “Mainstream Conservatism” accepts all the premises of “Mainstream Leftism”, since they’re all liberals. If they aren’t only agents of Globohomo playing their part.
You will never hear one argue that trannyjennism is but the ultimate conclusion to feminism. They like the good goys they are would never claim that a (White) woman doesn’t belong in the public sphere. That by disconnecting a woman’s role in reproduction from her place leads to men either “becoming” them or becoming degenerate.
Ellen Page always had a masculine way of walking and behaving. She was kinda cute, but there was something off about her, so this didn’t take me off guard, especially in a sick society where being a transsexual is cheered, but being a heterosexual White male is jeered.
Aren’t you glad Churchill and FDR allied themselves with communist Russia to defeat the über based National Socialist government in Germany and other pockets in Europe? Otherwise, we wouldn’t have Elliot Page, Caitlyn Jenner, and Chelsea Manning.
Many of the allied soldiers were propagandised that the Swastika was pink. Jews are pretty clever. Plenty of Tommies, GIs and Ivan’s died thinking they were protecting normality.
We’re talking about that ugly Ellen Page dyke, can the topic please not devolve into “the third reich?” Hunter could post a recipe for fried chicken and some of you would manage to spin the discussion into hitler.
@ Nightowl,
All roads lead back to Hitler, or they lead nowhere.
The Nazis eschewed fried chicken, which they regarded as a Negro product of the American South. (Okay, I made that one up.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKRFlNryaWw
Gradually I began to hate the Colonel
Coldstream Conservative
Western civilization is going to have to become a lot less civilized if it is going to survive.
@ spahnpink 1970, you have simply outdone yourself twinkish sir, how you manage a lisp, while mouth twerking is nothing short of remarkable , far be it from me to ask your secret, my wife on thee other hand would ask you,
If indeed as they allege Transgenderism and Homosexuality is genetic then shouldn’t we find the gene or genes that cause these abnormalities and eliminate them from the gene pool?
Just read the Westhunt by Gregory Cochran blog. They already did a study that failed to find any single genetic connections for homosexuality that weren’t also connected to being a schizo or drug addict.
Crspr Cas9 will be used by China to eliminate homos.
That picture of her looks like Sandra Bullock’s tomboy character from the 2000 film Miss Congeniality, before the beauty pageant makeover.
Some days I just have to laugh, before snapping back into reality and realizing that this is another humiliation for whites as a whole. The Justin Trudeau response was truly funny. Oh, man, we are truly fucked.
I would consider Ellen Page’s coming out as a boy?/eventually a man? is a either a loud cry for help or her going through a midlife crisis. This transition is also possibly a virtue signaling attempt to stay relevant as a celebrity being lesbian isn’t trendy enough I suppose.
So now all the films video games she’s going to be in will have say Elliot Page?! Unbelievable. This didn’t happen overnight but she probably has a group of handlers that feed into her deranged trans obsession over the last 5 years. This is a result of her denial of womanhood, refusal to be a mother and to have kids. Hell she can still be a bisexual carpet munching dyke but pump out a baby or two try to get some meaning in your damn life before she gets even more deluded and crazy
I never heard of her before this article but she looks like the type who will either be popping out a mulatto or buying a niglet like Madonna.
I knew it, she gave me those “dyke vibes” when she was a teen actress in the mid 2000’s. I did see some shit on Netflix where it became obvious she stepped in between the first and second series to rewrite the character in her image. In season one she played a normal girl, (though ugly receding hairline and her dykeness ruined the vibe) in season two the character was muff diving. My question is why was the industry miscasting this dyke in so many roles and cheating a normal female actress out of jobs that would improve the ambience of the movie?
Really though, I believe she’s a dyke, but the transgendered bit is insanity. Seems Freud was right about the neurotic nature of females and those with various other personality disorders are jumping on the bandwagon with this “transgendered” craze the same way weird girls got into “witchcraft” in the 90s after seeing the movie “The Craft” or the TV series “Charmed.” Abigail Shrier wrote a book on this phenomenon of mass hysteria amongst girls becoming “transgendered” due to social influence of this madness. The same neurotic vulnerable girls (probably with Aspergers) who used to develop eating disorders in their teens now think “transgenderism” is their key to happiness.
Mud sharking is another thing that is being pushed to the max. Take a look at current entertainment and advertising. But of course it’s all organic. There’s no over-arching strategy to reduce the White birthrate whatsoever….
When you’re White and need to secure your career in Hollywood…
Yep! They sure are raising the bar, aren’t they? No longer enough to suck and take Jew alien micro-penis up the butt (and/or let them fuck your children), now one has to come out as a trannie and get genital mutilation done to make them infertile too. Anything for that fame.
If Hunter can be Scarlett I don’t see why Ellen can’t be Elliot.
Living near one of the major “transition” centers in the US, I’ve met a few guys on their way to becoming surgically altered into proxy womanhood. It’s not an easy life they’ve chosen, with all the hormones they take, living as a woman for two years (dressing like one, using the ladies room and all that), intensive psychotherapy, plus all the expensive surgery. Some of them look like goddesses after the hormonal manipulation and surgical carving, but most end up looking like dudes in a dress and wig. Knowing that their new “vagina” is a penis turned inside out and stuffed inside makes them even less desirable.