Donald Trump Orders Strikes Against Houthis In Yemen

March 16, 2025 Hunter Wallace Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Politics, Populists, Progressives, Terrorism, Yemen 72

UPDATE:

I doubt this will end well for him.

I’m not going to spill any tears over the Houthis.

If you are a terrorist group that attacks American ships in order to disrupt the global supply chain, I think you are responsible for your own actions and should prepare for retaliation. The United States would have been justified in retaliating against Israel over the U.S.S. Liberty incident. Trump is equally justified in responding to these attacks on American ships in the Red Sea.

Note: The definition of an activist is someone who is outraged about Israel’s attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in the 1960s, but who supports hundreds of attacks on the U.S. Navy in the present day.

72 Comments

  1. The “Christian Nationalist” reveals his final form: a Zionist neocon who supports waging war on Israel’s enemies. When Trump attacks Iran, you will find a way to defend and justify that too.

    And as for what a “wignat” is: it is someone who actually defends Truth, rather than repeating the lies of the Jewish System, the way that “normal, sane paleocons” do.

    “Wignats” don’t compromise. “Wignats” don’t find excuses for backing ZOG’s action when it is convenient for them. “Wignats” recognize the Houthis and similar freedom fighters are the continuation of the National Socialist struggle in the world today. The Houthis, are the force of light, Zionist America the force of darkness.

    America is evil. America is terrorist. So of course, those who preach loyalty to “America” are, in the end, Zionist snakes who will defend all manner of terrorism that the Jewish entity commits, while slandering those on the Frontline of the fight against such as evil as “terrorists”.

    • What is a wignat?

      I would say a wignat is someone who hates Jews and hates Israel. That’s it.

      They don’t care really care about attacks on American sailors or the U.S.S. Liberty. They don’t care about White people. They don’t care about America. They’re don’t care about nationalism or immigration or any other issue. They hate Christians. Instead, they support attacks on American sailors, White people, Americans, so long as non-White Arab Muslims like the Houthis are doing it. They support 10 million illegal aliens flooding into our country so long as they think that they can own Jews in some way by voting for Kamala Harris. They are excessively antisemitic.

      This is why that whole scene collapsed into the black hole of Third Worldism and snuggling up to mulatto pimps like Andrew Tate or Muslims like Sulaiman Ahmed or obsessing over Palestinians and LARPing in Hezbollah t-shirts and slobbering over Lebanon. They love Arabs like the Houthis. They love Lebanon. They love Iran. They love Palestinians. They hate their own country and the people who live here. They are anti-Jewish, not pro-White. They are also not nationalists.

      A nationalist is someone who prioritizes the interests of their own country. These people hate their own country and support attacks on it, or don’t, depending on whether Jews are involved.

      • The Houthis see hundreds of thousands of people being genocided in Gaza, and risk their lives to stop it. Despite the extreme poverty and relentless bombing their own nation has suffered, they stand up selflessly against the most powerful forces of evil in the world, in support of their brothers and sisters facing genocidal terrorism.

        How do White people react to the demographic genocide of their own people, at the hands of that same ZOG?

        They sit back and let it happen. As long as it happens LEGALLY. And they think they can VOOT their way out of the worst of it.

        White people have been drugged up and bought off. Potentially, they could be a greater threat to ZOG than some Arabs. But the jews don’t treat Whites the way they treat Palestinians, instead they give Whites the good life. White privilege, in a sense. They even make them think that Jewish interests are White interests, and that trick has worked on most “racist” Whites. Including you, it seems.

        The only exception are, to some extent, Russians, who have remained relatively healthy and unbrainwashed by the jewish narrative, hence the war propaganda against them. The Wagner forces are the closest thing to White Houthis that exist. Still, Trump is working overtime to make sure that Russia is co-opted as well. That is what his supposed moves toward “peace” with Russia are about.

        The current state of the White race is pathetic because of what the jews have reduced Whites too – but there is a growing number of White Zoomers and younger who ARE Noticing, which clearly has jews scared that Whites will not always be the golems. Dinosaurs like you will try to fight back by saying antisemitism is anti-White, but the rise of antisemitism among young Whites is inevitable, and in running cover for the jews you and your ilk will just alienate them further from your dying worldview.

        And when this reaches the boiling point, the forces of jewry will no longer be at peace with the future generation of Whites. It will be war, and you have made it clear which side you would be on.

        • You’re making my point for me.

          Wignats are anti-Semitic, but also anti-Trump, anti-White, anti-Christian, anti-American, anti-nationalist. They don’t care about anything except for their obsession with Jews and Israel. They are against Jews and Israel. They are not for anything positive.

          As a result of this, the whole scene has collapsed into Third Worldism and simping for Muslims like Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah while attacking White people and Christians and downplaying other issues like immigration. Politically, it would be hard to create a more ineffective message than this. I hope the Houthis see this comment!

          I’ve had “NS” types tell me my worldview is “dying” for 25 years now. In reality, my politics have never been more mainstream, and their organizations go through the same cycle of making big pronouncements and collapsing from a lack of interest and infighting in the span of two or three years. Remember Charlottesville or the National Justice Party?

          If they are inevitable, what keeps happening to them? Why have they abandoned politics? It doesn’t look like it to me. Man, I have seen WN 1.0 rise and fall, and it rebrand as the Alt-Right, and I have seen that collapse because the same people became the public face of it, and it rebrand as America First, and that collapse for the same reason.

          • “In reality, my politics have never been more mainstream” – among geriatric boomers (and the occasional young incel male who won’t reproduce) maybe.

            You say you are for something positive – so are you helping poor White people in your own community? A big part of why Hamas became so popular among Palestinians is because they are the only ones who would provide help to the poorest and neediest among them. The only people I’ve seen suggest Whites do the same things for our own communities are what you would call “wignats”. “Redpilling” a bunch of comfortable middle class boomers about the need to VOOT HARDER never worked for anyone.

          • Yes, we do that at our church.

            Christians have always helped people in need in their communities. I have also participated in things like hurricane relief efforts in Florida. Wignats are so out of touch with reality that they think that charitable acts make them special or that it is something no one else is doing. Of course, they also believe they should get something out of it politically, namely spinning their wheels about Jews.

            “NS” types have always thought the next generation would save them. They said that about Boomers like Robert Mathews. They have said that about Gen X skinheads. They used to say that about Millennial Alt-Rights. They say that today about Zoomers.

        • > The Houthis see hundreds of thousands of people being genocided in Gaza, and risk their lives to stop it. Despite the extreme poverty and relentless bombing their own nation has suffered, they stand up selflessly against the most powerful forces of evil in the world, in support of their brothers and sisters facing genocidal terrorism.

          That’s kind of true, but you seem to forget that the Gaza population – while being largely Muslim – are of the Sunni branch while the Houthis are Shiites. There might be other factors in play with respect to Houthi support of Gaza. The one thing that I hardly ever see mentioned is that the much larger neighboring Sunni countries (Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia) have done zero from the Gaza victims. Likewise the Sunni Turks have joined with the Zionists to invade and parcel-up Syria. No aid for the Gaza victims – that for the white chumps to pay.

          > How do White people react to the demographic genocide of their own people, at the hands of that same ZOG?

          > They sit back and let it happen. As long as it happens LEGALLY. And they think they can VOOT their way out of the worst of it.

          > White people have been drugged up and bought off. Potentially, they could be a greater threat to ZOG than some Arabs. But the jews don’t treat Whites the way they treat Palestinians, instead they give Whites the good life. White privilege, in a sense. They even make them think that Jewish interests are White interests, and that trick has worked on most “racist” Whites. Including you, it seems.

          I don’t agree that this characterization applies much to HW, and I’ve been around here longer than you have. It does sadly apply to far too many whites though. Why is this? How has this come to pass? You think Pagan larping is the answer? Did it ever occur to you that jews – being largely diabolical narcissists – kind of thrive off folks like yourself endlessly talking about them. It actually gives them a kind of spiritual power. At the end of the day, jews have power because whites handed it over to them.

      • “…by voting for Kamala Harris.” – you really have a wild hair up your a** for Dicky Spencer

        • I was referring specifically to TRS with that one who did a whole show boasting about it. They thought Kamala Harris was going to win Pennsylvania.

          • TRS went so far off the rails with their ugly venom for poor and rural Whites (MY people) that I had to finally give up on them totally, delete their bookmark, etc. I don’t know what their “hot takes” are now, and I don’t care. Those morons might as well not exist.

          • Last year, I listened to Ben Shapiro to see if Ben spoke the same with the same venom about rural Whites. I can confirm that he does not

    • America is Globalism. America is race-mixing. America is Porn. America is LGBTQXYZ.
      America is $$$$ over everything. America is anti-White.

  2. It’s interesting how quickly things escalated from “I don’t care about Mahmoud getting deported” to “I openly support ZOG wars in the Middle East now”.

    Southern Nationalists were better back when they used to burn American flags and sing “for this Yankee nation, I do not give a damn!” When did Southern Nationalism turn into boomer Amerikwan patriotardism exactly?

    • Third Worldists spent days whining about Mahmoud being deported.

      I’m not a Third Worldist. I don’t care about the Houthis. I don’t care about Lebanon. I don’t care that Mahmoud was deported. Everyone named Mahmoud should be deported regardless of whether they are a U.S. citizen and regardless of what they think about Israel.

      The Nationalist Front was by far the biggest mistake that Southern Nationalists have made in recent years. We should have never gotten involved with people who have a fundamentally different worldview. I saw how that worked out for us in Shelbyville and other places.

      Where is Jeff Schoep these days? What happened to Heimbach?

      • “Everyone named Mahmoud should be deported”

        Should everyone named Cohen also be deported?

        But frankly, if they were deporting him for his name that would be a less worrying precedent.

        The fact that they are deporting him for being “antisemitic” according to the ADL’s definition is horrifying. It is a further step towards European-style “hate speech” laws.

        • I’m fine with that.

          More than anything else, I am sick of wignats saying that issues like immigration do not matter, and what is important is Iran’s interests or what is going in Lebanon or someone named Mahmoud being deported.

          • If you’re “fine” with “hate-speech” laws, then you have truly lost the plot. And I don’t see too many people saying that immigration doesn’t matter.

  4. The reason the USS Liberty incident is significant is because Israel is supposedly our ally. The reason the Houthis and Iran are hostile towards us is because we’re hostile towards them, through our support of Israel. We should want good relations with Iran, for our own benefit. We can get things from Iran (e.g. oil). We get nothing from Israel. They’re a parasite.
    Also, for anyone who isn’t aware, that Charles ‘wotancore’ guy Hunter is repeatedly reposting is Jewish https://x.com/wotancore/status/1892637717130793119 and Hunter already knows that. He’s perfectly fine boosting Jewish narratives that the only reason vessels are being attacked is because the Houthis are “terrorists” and I guess hate us for no reason at all (must be they want to take our freedoms!).

      • You are distorting the issue to get an own on “activists.” As the commentor above correctly points out the issue with the liberty was not the outrage of muh fellow muricans being attacked, but that it was done by a nominal ally and covered up by the government. Furthermore the purpose of that attack was a false flag, that failed because they took too long to die, to bait the US into a war for Israel (sounds pretty relevant to the past two decades if you ask me). As for the Houthis they are defending themselves by international law. The US is the AGGRESSOR. Stop with this neocon spin (oh wait I forgot, the paleocons are in control now).

        If anyone is interested in an english assessment of the Houthis and their ideology I recommend Dr. Johnson’s work here: https://www.radioalbion.com/2024/02/the-daily-nationalist-houthi-victory-dn.html

        • I just wish people would be honest.

          They actually don’t care about attacks on the U.S. Navy. They just hate Jews and Israel. That’s it.

          This is why they support Houthi attacks on the U.S. military because the Houthis are against “Zionism” and part of the “Axis of Resistance.” If that is your position, then own it. The multiracial “anti-Zionist” movement has nothing to do with White people. Activists have shifted from being pro-White to anti-Semitic. They don’t really care about anything else.

          • The Houthis are right and the US Government is wrong. The only people who support this are jews, the us government, and their dogs. The white position is the right position. You don’t get to claim more “pro-white” credibility while taking the wrong position. Same for the deportation of the Palestine activist. Here is Phil Giraldi (not a national socialist) making the point that it is about the first amendment and shutting down speech jews dont like: https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/the-death-of-free-speech-in-america/

            Why cant you just take the right position?

          • 1. No American president is ever going to tolerate pirates and terrorists attacking the U.S. Navy and American shipping.

            2. It is activists who identify with the Houthis because of their obsession with “anti-Zionism.” I would love to see the polling on the issue and specifically what White people think of it. I’m confident that the overwhelming majority of White people in America disagree with activists and do not support the Houthis. Some people are fond of falsely conflating their own views with White people.

            3. You’ve defined “having pro-White credibility” as being anti-Semitic and have subtracted everything else.

            4. Finally, the fact that your activism has become about supporting someone named Mahmoud from being deported or supporting Hamas in Gaza or simping for Hezbollah in Iran or the Houthis in Yemen or Iran illustrates how singularly focused you have become on Jews and Israel, and how everything else that used to matter has been lost. I hope the Houthis see this. White people who see this are going to make a beeline in the opposite direction.

  5. This is one area where HW is partially on target. It is one thing to oppose involvement in foreign wars in general – especially when your own country is being invaded and your own people are being replaced. The ‘activists’ go off the rails here. It is no better to take the Arab side in the middle-east conflict between the Zionist Empire and its neighbors than it is to take Satanyahoo’s side. Staying out of it means opposing the government siding with one over the other. Unfortunately Trump clearly sides with Satanyahoo, and (also unfortunately) far too many Christians do as well. It’s perfect right to call them out on this error – without calling for joining the other side. Over the last week or so there have been several hasbara-types here professing to be Christians while praising our new ‘friends’ – the Synagogue of Satan. Christianity needs to go back to Luther’s understanding of the JQ. Anything less is heresy and/or apostasy.

    Mamoud is not our problem. If he opposes what Israel is doing he should have left the US and joined up with Hamas, Hezbollah or the Houthis. Instead he’s protesting here – yet another ‘Baksheesh Boy’ (the ‘baksheesh’ here being our text dollars) telling the white man to take up his cause instead of taking it up himself – a major reason the Israelis have been winning, by the way. The flip side of this equation is that we shouldn’t be fighting the jews’ wars for them either. I say a pox be upon both of their houses.

    As I explained on the other thread, the Liberty incident is not comparable to what’s happening now with the Houthis and the shipping. Bottom line is that if the US and the EUSSR really think supporting Israel in its clearly genocidal ambitions is great idea, they’d best be willing to bear the cost – which will include acts of war against their ships. The USA has already taken sides. The Houthis are *not* terrorists. They don’t attack any random passing ship. Chinese vessels transit the passage without problems, a demonstration that (unlike the US regime), the Chinese government acts more in the interest of the Chinese that it does in the interest of foreigners. Trump would do well to emulate Xi in this area.

    • I like that “hasbara” thing. Why are wignats always accusing the people who call them out on their monomania of being jews? I’m a Scots-Irish Southron and I don’t like the Jews at all (those lying, Christ hating rats posing as the “Chosen ones” to fool Western Christians), but me and my nation are never going to be national socialist, either? That’s a foreign ideology, not welcome in the South.

    • Terrorism is using violence to achieve political goals — so the fact that Houthis attack ONLY U.S. (or allied) ships and ignore the Chinese, etc., proves that they ARE terrorists, not merely pirates.

  6. The US should be bombing cartels in Mexico.
    Instead it’s fighting the Shia Axis because they’re Israel’s one enemy.

    “They attacked America, they should be retaliated against.”
    They attacked because the US-Israel attacked first. We are still doing the neocon jew routine of fighting Mohammedans. Enough!

    Southerners salivate for Jew wars, have been doing it since before Pearl Harbor, loved the Gulf Wars, loved the War on Terror, what’s the deal down there? Is it the Evangelical crusader larp animating this?

    • The U.S. has always dealt with pirates this way stretching back to the Barbary Pirates. The Marines were created to deal with groups like this. Marines were the first Americans to land in Japan in the Perry expedition over trade. The idea that we should just sit back and passively allow terrorist groups to attack our ships and control global trade routes is compelling to activists and no one else. The same activists also laughably pretend to be upset about the U.S.S. Liberty being attacked.

      • You call them ‘pirates’ or ‘terrorists’ to pretend there aren’t legitimate state actors at play here. And Brian is right, we attacked first. How many times has US soil been bombed by Iran, or how many times have they assassinated Americans? We do that regularly in Iran.
        The solution is to stop supporting Israel and making enemies on behalf of them. You try pretend that it’s somehow unavoidable Iran is our enemy, when you know Trump has the power to unilaterally reverse our policy on the Middle East and he just doesn’t do it. Even if you don’t believe Trump will ever take a neutral stance on Israel, it makes zero sense to defend his actions here unless you support continuing making enemies with Iran and their proxies. You could always criticize him on this issue and ask for more. You don’t, because you support Israel.

  7. At the current moment , US and NATO doesn’t have any means to destroy Houthis. NATO weapons can only hurt Houthis when they ignore safety precautions like Nasrallah and other leaders. Last 2 years have demonstrated that Houthis are modern fighters not old school dogmatics who prefer good manners to efficiency.

  8. >The definition of an activist is someone who is outraged about Israel’s attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in the 1960s, but who supports hundreds of attacks on the U.S. Navy in the present day.

    Why is the US bombing Yemen?
    Because Israel.
    Why did the US coverup the attack on the Liberty.
    Because Israel.

    America is beholden to Israel. Trump is beholden to Israel. That is the point. BTW its not “american ships” but specifically american ships enroute to Israel. They also stopped after the ceasefire but have began actions again because the jews, being lying duplicitious murderers, cant help but kill Palastinians despite the ceasefire. So yes they deserve to be hit as they are enabling a genocide. Its the Houthis who are enforcing the Geneva convention here lol. This action is to support Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Trump is Israel first and you understood this in 2018 but now you apologize for it. Furthermore, this is what I meant the other day when I said we are seeing a continuity of ZOG policy. Biden also bombed Yemen, Trump is promising to do more. Brad supports it. Its not too late to stop what you are doing Brad.

    • The Houthis are attacking American ships and obstructing a major global trade route in the Red Sea. That’s why Yemen is being bombed. Joe Biden bombed them for the same reason. I didn’t attack Joe Biden for that because no American president can be expected to allow terrorists and pirates to just attack the U.S. Navy which is under his command. It is also the Houthis who made the choice to go down this road and Trump’s response to them was predictable.

      I don’t think terms like “National Socialist” or “White Nationalist” make any sense here. In order to be a nationalist, you have to identify with your own nation and put its interests first. Hitler was a German nationalist. In order to be a White Nationalist, you have to identify with White people and put White people first. Activists identify with Arabs, Iranians and Muslims and other non-Whites like Andrew Tate who are “anti-Zionists.” They put Palestine First, Lebanon First, Yemen First, Iran First. They have become Third Worldists who are just anti-Semitic.

      • “They have become…” Actual White Nationalists and National Socialists have been opposing wars in the Middle East for DECADES no matter how “patriotic” the justification was. Do you forget that the invasion of Afghanistan was literally because “they were harboring Bin Laden”? It was never WN policy to support ZOG wars until those pesky “third worldists” came along. Is David Duke a Third Worldist too? He hasn’t commented yet on the latest attack, but he has expressed support for Yemen in the past.

        It’s utterly unreal that you think Hitler would have sided with Zion Don over a group of freedom fighters whose slogan is literally “a curse upon the Jews” because of some retarded notion that “nationalism” means supporting your government. Being Nationalist and especially National Socialist is about supporting the interests of your People, not the “rights” of ZOG capitalists to ship weapons to jews to slaughter Palestinians.

        Also, haven’t you openly said you aren’t a White Nationalist anymore and don’t care about WN? But then you tell White Nationalists that they aren’t really White Nationalists unless they support bombing Yemen, as if you have any right to lecture people on an ideology you don’t even follow.

        • I don’t think of wignats as White Nationalists or National Socialists.

          In order to be a nationalist, you have to identify with your own people and prioritize their interests. Wignats are the opposite of nationalists. They hate their own people. They do not identify with their own nations. They prioritize the interests of non-Whites in the Third World. If Hitler had been a wignat, he would have hated Germany and supported foreigners attacking Germans and devoted his attention to the welfare of Third World countries. Wignats devote their attention to Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Yemen, etc. Wignats spent all of last week bemoaning the tragedy of someone named Mahmoud being deported.

          The actual National Socialists shipped Jews to Palestine to get them out of Germany. There is nothing “nationalist” about wignats and they mostly spend their time bashing White people. They also fly off the handle and go on shooting sprees. Again, it is better to just stand for values and avoid labels because labels can be hijacked by unstable bad actors.

          As far wars in the Middle East, Trump has temporarily ended the wars in Gaza and Lebanon, which is a good thing. If Houthis want to attack American ships in the Red Sea, they only have themselves to blame when Trump responds to them. They are not victims.

      • Also, it is strange that you go on about being an “ethical universalist”, because of your “Christian values”, but at the same time “don’t care” about Lebanon or Gaza or Yemen or Iran. A “wignat” shooting up a bunch of non-Whites is evil and means all “wignats” must be condemned, but ZOG slaughtering children in the Middle East is justified and only a “Third Worldist” is against that.

        I guess murdering non-White civilians is only evil when those non-White civilians live in White countries, whereas when it is killing them in their own countries, it’s the true White thing to do. Any objection means you don’t care about White people, apparently. Murder is evil when done by a powerless “wignat”, but when done by the powerful Zionist elite, it is fully justified.

        • Believe it or not, but this website isn’t about Gaza, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, etc.

          I didn’t create this website because I have humanitarian concerns about non-White people in the Third World. I didn’t create this site to talk the Middle East every day. I’ve never been a Third Worldist. Pirates and terrorists who attack American ships are not victims. They are not being “murdered.” Also, I wrote dozens of articles about Israel’s slaughter of children in Gaza, opposed it, and I am glad Trump put a stop to it.

          • When you live under an Empire spanning the entire world there is no meaningful separation between foreign and domestic policy. Mass immigration, “culture”, trade, banking, and militarism are all aspects of imperial policy. This is further distorted by the fact the american empire is controlled by jews, putting its policies at odds with its own long term interests, a fact well explicated by John Mearsheimer. You are engaging in a sort of tactical-provincialism that has no justification in reality, the priorities of the State are in Israel not Alabama, and whatever domestic policy shifts do take place also have their origin in imperial concerns. I find it very ironic that you celebrate the superficial ascendency of paleoconservatism yet find yourself taking the opposite positions of paleocons like Phil Giraldi. All they had to do was slap a vaguely buchananite coat of paint on neoconservatism to get your support. America-Israel represents the forces of piracy and terrorism not the Houthis.

      • >The Houthis are attacking American ships and obstructing a major global trade route in the Red Sea. That’s why Yemen is being bombed

        No. They are obstructing ships bound for Israel. Ships not bound for Israel are not obstructed. This is about Israeli war crimes. There is no other context, Thomas Jefferson and barbary pirates are not relevant. This action is in support of the genocide. Yes ofc its predictable. Obviously the policy prerogative of the American government is to defend the Zionist state, regardless of who is president. You challenge others to own their support for the enemies of the American empire and I do support the axis of resistance, just as I support the long dead axis of (Aryan) resistance. So why dont you own your support for the Zionist State?

      • Nice straw man.

        If we were “Palestine First”, we would be advocating for foreign aid to Palestine and economic sanctions against Israel, maybe even bombing Israel.

        But that is not what we are advocating.

        We say, don’t give foreign aid to either side. Don’t put sanctions on either side. Don’t bomb either side. Stay neutral – “Honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.”

        Unless they target OUR homeland like Al-Qaeda did, or enslave real American merchant mariners engaged in peaceful commerce with peaceful nations like the Barbary pirates did. Then we have a duty to fight back against our OWN enemies.

        But there is absolutely no reason for us to fight Israel’s enemies, especially if doing so helps our enemy Al-Qaeda while hurting ourselves and our friends (Europe, Middle Eastern Christians).

      • “The Houthis are attacking American ships and obstructing a major global trade route in the Red Sea. That’s why Yemen is being bombed.”
        Why are the Houthis doing that? It’s always tactical nihilism with you.
        “In order to be a nationalist, you have to identify with your own nation and put its interests first.”
        You’re conflating the nation with ZOG.
        It’s in the nation’s interest to have good relations with Iran and to have a different policy vis-à-vis Israel. For example we could leverage US influence over Israel to try stopping them from sowing chaos in the region, or even shift to an entirely neutral stance and abandon them. Trump has the authority to entirely change the policy.
        Why are you even responding to people with people? You’re not engaging with reality, you just have pre-scripted dishonest framing about how “activists” just love brown people or something. The only implication people can take from this is that you love Jews. Regardless, you’re not convincing anyone.

        • Hank, I think that makes sense. I do think Hunter is wrong on this one. Just focusing on the Houthi attacks isn’t really looking at the full issue. The Houthis are doing what they’re doing because Israel is doing what they’re doing, and Israel does what it does because our country finances and protect Israel. We should pull the rug out from under Israel. We should have en entirely neutral policy toward Israel, Iran, Yemen, Syria, the whole region. We don’t need to endorse or antagonize any of these players. That would literally solve the problem.

          Reverse the roles for a minute. Imagine Yemen was mass murdering a group of Jews in their territory, and Israel started shooting missiles at Yemeni ships in protest. The United States would not only support Israel, but would likely invade Yemen to rescue the poor helpless little Jews being abused by those mean Houthis. So the solution remains: cut off all funding for Israel and all other foreign governments. End our alliance with Israel and all other foreign governments. American neutrality solves the problem.

  9. Yes it’s good to draw distinctions between attacking a sovereign nation and attacking rebels who are attacking supply ships. The latter is justified.
    If the ships are merely passing thru and not interfering with local fish stocks or harming a local area in any way, then they ought to just let them pass.

    • They were only targeting ships which were Israeli owned or en route to Israeli ports, until Biden started bombing them. Then they started retaliating by shooting back at American warships.

      If we put our trade with Israel on a cash-and-carry basis and stayed neutral in the Israel vs. Axis of Resistance war, then there would be no US/Houthi conflict.

      Unlike the Somalis, the Houthis are not engaging in piracy for profit. They are establishing a blockade against Israel as retaliation for the Israeli blockade against Gaza.

      Getting involved is contrary to the national interests of the American people.

      “Honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.”

      • Perfectly well put. Our alliance with Israel is absurd, and doesn’t help us at all. It’s simply that Jews buy off our politicians. If we told Israel to take a hike we’d have peace in the Middle East and low gas prices.

  10. This is where I stand on all of this:

    I used to be neck deep in all of the antisemitism. I read Anglin on a daily basis. I listened to TRS. I read dozens of blogs devoted to nationalism of some form or another, and I studied all of the arguments about the JQ.

    Inevitably, when something appears to go “our” way, a naysayer has always been there to remind us of the “kosher sandwich”. In all cases, the argument goes, a Jew is behind the scenes shepherding the flock of goyim in a direction that is manageable for the Jews. This is the argument.

    It’s an argument for which there can be no counter-argument. It’s a presentation of narrative that can always explain away anything and everything. There are no other areas of life that work this way, save for the almighty power of God himself, where every outcome can be explained by one source of power. Jews are literally elevated to a supernatural force with these people. All powerful, everywhere, pervasive in every way. I often wonder if these people lay in bed at night hearing Jewish voices commanding them to do this or that. Why not? It seems to me that even schizophrenia can be blamed on Jewish power if you tie the logic of it all into the knot that it ultimately is.

    Take Stephen Miller. The man has done nothing but good for our cause. He’s more nationalistic and pro-white than most NS “activists”. Yet, I’m to be convinced that in reality, he’s working against my interests, because in some tangential way, he’s only looking out for his Jewish brethren.

    I understand the danger of ethnic nepotism among Jews, and I know the historic problems it has caused. I do not think it unwise to keep them at arms length in many areas. But I will not be blinded by irrational arguments for which no sufficient amount of contrary evidence can ever be presented. This is schizophrenic antisemitism. It is the world of cranks. Count me out.

    • This is what I would call a fair and well-reasoned criticism of those who get caught in the trap of obsession over jews. Yes he’s certainly the exception and not the rule but as far as I can tell Stephen Miller has done more to address the open borders issue than any NS types have. Even if his primary motivation is in the prevention of the USA becoming country 110, it happens to align with our own best longterm interests as well.

  11. This is an unnecessary counter-productive war.

    We should be aligned with Shiites against our REAL enemies, Al-Qaeda.

    In the past 35 years:
    The Houthis have never attacked the American homeland or Europe.
    Hezbollah has never attacked the American homeland or Europe.
    The Palestinians have never attacked the American homeland or Europe.
    Iran has never attacked the American homeland or Europe.
    Saddam Hussein never attacked the American homeland or Europe.
    Qaddafi never attacked the American homeland or Europe.
    Assad never attacked the American homeland or Europe.
    No secular Arab nationalist of any kind has ever attacked the American homeland or Europe.
    No Shiite Muslim of any kind has ever attacked the American homeland or Europe.

    EVER SINGLE MUSLIM TERROR ATTACK of the past 35 years in Europe and America has been Al-Qaeda, or Al-Qaeda offshoots such as ISIS, or similar Salafist (aka Wahhabi) terrorists.

    Al-Qaeda are responsible for hundreds of terror attacks in America and Europe, resulting in thousands of deaths.

    We should wage war against our OWN enemies. We should not wage war against the enemies of our enemies, because that HELPS our enemies.

    Like the Hapsburgs who allied with Safavid Persia against the Ottoman Empire, we should ally with Shiites and secular Arab nationalists against Al-Qaeda.

    We don’t do this, because the Israel Lobby unfortunately controls our foreign policy.

    The results have been atrocious:
    Our Israeli “allies” helped Azerbaijan ethnically cleanse 100,000 Armenians from Karabakh.
    Our Israeli “allies” helped Al-Qaeda take over Syria and persecute the Syrian Christians.
    Al-Qaeda and its offshoots are now more powerful than ever.
    Trillions of dollars of American taxpayer dollars have been wasted.
    Thousands of American soldiers have died.
    Europe and America have been flooded with refugees.
    Export opportunities have been lost.
    We came to the brink of war with nuclear Russia.

    Shilling for the Israel Lobby’s catastrophically flawed foreign policy is almost as bad as shilling for open borders.

    • Excellent analysis. Your understanding of the splits in the Islamic world far exceeds that of anyone in Trump’s cabinet. You should be Secretary of State, not Little Marco Foamio (famous for his hot-tub foam-parties with underage girls). HW says the U.S.S. Liberty is meaningless because it happened so long ago. That’s a false notion. It means a lot because it demonstrates that even in 1967 OUR GREATEST ALLY (who is anything but) already had total control of the government to the point where their puppet LBJ ordered the abortion of the rescue mission being prepared by the nearest carrier when the got the distress call. That’s high treason – nothing less. Things have not improved in any way since 1967.

      Massie should have been smarter and simply abstained for voted present instead of grandstanding. He’s the only one Trump has threatened to primary – which is telling. This latest obscene porkulus wasn’t a hill worth dying as it was going to pass regardless of his vote.

  12. I think the Houthis are misunderstood. Their disruption of shipping from China to the US is just their way of showing support for America First. Send them boys some MAGA hats.

    Anyway, did I miss the EO where Trump renamed the Red Sea the American Sea? I’d be amazed if 5% of Americans could find Yemen on a map.

  13. “The definition of an activist is someone who is outraged about Israel’s attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in the 1960s, but who supports hundreds of attacks on the U.S. Navy in the present day.”

    What if I’m still rooting for the C.S. Navy? Or have we abandoned that dream to (hopefully just pretend to?) care about this modern abomination’s seafaring power projection force?

  14. The graph of increased shipping times is a model of the inflation of the cost for all goods passing through the Suez. Like it or not, that is a tax on everything Whitey imports, and on the global cost of fuel.

    When you tell me I need to support arab pirates to spite the jews, and I see my cost of living go up, I want to know how you expect to sell NS to Whitey when you don’t even understand the fundamental economic reality Whitey lives in.

    Is it ideal that the Suez is a choke point for global commerce that can be threatened by pirates in the year 2025? No, but it is reality.

    I suggest to NatSocs that if they don’t like that our national interests are impacted so easily so far from home that they should be more supportive of Trump, who is hell bent on getting control over Canada (through trade deals if nothing else), Greenland (through treaty, or trade deal or annexation) and the Panama Canal (by any means necessary) to secure shipping routes through the arctic that will make the Suez irrelevant in a generation, and across the isthmus of panama so that our trade can run unobstructed around the continent. Cost of living is an inherent interest of the White working class. None of this was on Kamalahs radar, but you told us to vote for her. Why?

    Good luck selling your average White normie on supporting terrorists and pirates. It doesn’t make sense any way you slice it, and you won’t even get to the part about the Jews before they’ve already decided you’re an idiot, even if you aren’t entirely wrong.

    Nobody here is under any illusion about the perfidy of Jews. Where we disagree is in believing that Jews somehow own a monopoly on perfidy, and hatred of Whites. I seem to recall our beef with Persia predating the first Temple, when they invaded the Helenic world. Some crusades against Islam that no crusader would have appreciated being told were just for the Jews. The loss of Great Constantinople to the Turks. The founding of our own navy was to fight arab pirates molesting our shipping in the Mediterranean.

    When the arctic sea lanes are controlled by the US navy and Russia Navy, ice breakers are running constantly or are no longer needed because of climactic warming, our national interests will no longer be so easily effected, and I’ll be the first to celebrate that we can let the pirates have their dusty dying region to themselves. Until then, there are White interests there, and we have the navy to pursue them.

    Anybody that supports terrorists and pirates is fighting an uphill battle against every organic force of civilization. If Yemen needs to burn, it won’t be the first time. A few years ago it was the Saudis burning Yemen because they also were fed up with their crap. This nothing new.

    • Israel has created the Arab hostility by this point. The cost of Israel is astronomical.

  15. “The “Christian Nationalist” reveals his final form: a Zionist neocon who supports waging war on Israel’s enemies.”

    go houthis go!
    fk zog.

  16. @HW and everyone else who is willing to get an actual perspective on what is going on. Please watch this short interview from today from Judge Napolitano’s channel.

    https://www.youtube.com/live/NXsykiIDK2g?si=MKatNtysiP55f9qZ

    This is just the latest symptom of the internal conflict within Israel itself, but don’t forget that this conflict exists here in the United States and in the whole diaspora.

    This death cult mentality of the hard line jews is anathema to Trumps policy of America first, and he is knee deep in the contradictions, trying to keep us out of a war with Iran, which he doesn’t want.

    The Jewish community is far from united. Their ethnic cohesion is breaking down in real time before our eyes, and their power is going with it. Its all they ever had.

    Give this process time. They are losing their grip on us. We don’t want to be in a position where they are trying to drag us into another war, the same way they’ve been trying to drag us into one in Ukraine.

    Play the long game. Focus on your family and make hay while the good times last. Let them keep alienating everything and everybody.

  17. If you compare Dailywire or Breitbart to this site, you will fail to find any significant differences between them. I can already see the day where Wallace announces he is working for Ben Shapiro.

  18. The cause of the Houthis certainly isn’t mine, but neither is the cause of Israel. Our friend Hunter often says that the power of the Jews is waning in the United States, and that may be true, I’m still not sure, but even if we’re in the early stages of declining Jewish power Jewish elite organizations are still quite powerful. Clearly American foreign policy is still intensely focused on Israel. That’s what all this stuff in the Middle East is ultimately about. We could solve the problem of the Houthis tomorrow simply by withdrawing our financial and military support from all parties in the region (indeed, from all parties worldwide). Without American support, Israel could not longer engage in ethnic cleansing with impunity, and they’d have to play nice with their neighbors. The Houthis wouldn’t be attacking shipping if Israel stopped its little mass murder campaigns against their racial enemies. So clearly the solution is for America to just not be involved, and even to declare its neutrality before the world. Back in the 19th century this was our policy and it served us well.

    But, Jewish power means we’re fully committed to supporting Israel’s militaristic expanionsim. This is very unfortunate for our nation and our people. As a White nationalist, I denounce the whole policy, and advocate for a genuinely America First policy which means, quite simply, putting America and the interest of White Americans first. White Americans are not served by taking sides in the Middle East, and certainly not by funding the most reckless and violent party in the conflict: Israel.

    I wonder if you aren’t going a bit in the opposite extreme here, Hunter. I certainly agree that the Jews aren’t behind everything, and they’re not the only issue, but they are AN issue, and our disastrous foreign policy is certainly related to the Jewish issue. While new tech elites like Elon Musk aren’t Jewish themselves, they grow up in heavily Jewish circles (that’s the nature of American elite circles, they are simply heavily Jewish at this point) and probably feel a certain solidarity with the concerns of Jewish elites. Elites tend to back each other, and the Jewish power bloc is one branch of the American elite, and other American elites are willing to show them good will, or even support them, just as Jewish elites are willing to support them.

    All this leads us to the conclusion that ordinary White Americans need to regain influence in their societies and hopefully shift the direction of all this. A genuinely America first policy would mean our military would be here at home, possibly doing in Mexico what the Israelis are doing in Syria right now. To eliminate drug cartels, it might make sense to set up some sort of buffer zone in northern Mexico. Of course, our military isn’t doing that, but it is overseas fighting Benny Netenyahu’s fights for him.

  19. Just apologize for being a racist and a sexist already, dude. Get it over with. Apologize for ever being mean to Jews. Apologize for Charlottesville. Apologize for the Confederate activism. Apologize for the Altright. You are dragging this out like ol Dick Spencer.

    • Very funny.

      I have lots of regrets.

      I regret, for example, tagging along for the Richard Spencer College Tour. I don’t regret “racism” or “sexism.” But associating with a bunch of clowns like Evan McLaren?

  20. I don’t care about the Hootis and I don’t want any worshipers of that Arabian Moon Demon in my country, not a one. Jews have to go as well, because if you try to limit their usury, they form gangs of murderers and assassinate the leadership. It happened in America many times after Jackson killed the bank, and they murdered thousands of important people on Europe. They have to go.

    As to the Hootis, it is crazy to call them terrorists and pirates. They have never been terrorists. They are in fact the government of most of Yemen.

    You might have noticed, there is a war going on over there. They have chosen to take part in that war, and have done so successfully, despite being bombed constantly by Zog and Saudi for ten years. Still they stand tall.

    Those Yemenis are a dangerous bunch. They are certainly far more admirable than the U.S. Marines, a true terrorist group that goes all over the world murdering and looting, and all for no good reason.

  21. Interesting debate here.

    I suppose what’s occurred is that Trump cut a deal with Jewry to get other needed things done. Hamas attacking Israeli outposts along the Gaza Strip finally seems to have made Jewish people see the danger of diversity in the U.S.

    The only question remaining is to see if whites can later hold their nerve once Jewish interests inevitably revert back to forcing diversity and dilution of white demographics.

  22. It’s very difficult to say what I want to hear without violating the rules against profanity, so I’ll just say this: a pox on both the houses of Israel and Palestine, and may they wipe each other out so we can FOCUS ON OUR INTERESTS FOR ONCE!

  23. That’s crap. You do know it’s (quite literally) treason to support a foreign army murdering American soldiers, right? However did you go so wrong?

    • “Murdering”. LOL. Defending tour country against genocidal imperialist terrorists isn’t murder, but slaughtering Yemeni children with airstrikes is.

  24. The “national socialist” reveals his true form here: an insane terrorist who would murder American soldiers (including family, neighbors, people at their church) in order to spite Da j00z. The He** with them all.

    • Well said, patriot. We vote Republican in Red states and we fight for American values like democracy and women’s rights. That’s what Mad Dog Mattis wanted and if it’s good enough for an American soldier like him, by God it is good enough for me.

      We also fight for Christian values like pro-life but we also don’t want icky brown people in America, even though Jesus was against racism and forgave whores. I am a true Christian.

      I love my black neighbors and my Mainline Protestant church.

  25. Michael Tracey is spot on about MAGAtards reaction to the US bombing the Houthis in Yemen.

    Michael Tracey
    @mtracey
    ·
    2h
    Watching the MAGA loyalists assemble into their usual cheerleading formation to praise this — a slightly more chest-thumping continuation of Biden’s policy, which they uniformly hated — is one of the most vivid illustrations of partisan brain-damage you can ever hope to witness

    https://x.com/mtracey/status/1901789513375985833

  26. This is an olive branch to Europe. Clearing the Houthis out would be a much more disproportionate benefit to European maritime interests than American. Or, the Charlie Daniels Doctrine: “We may do a little fightin’ ‘mongst ourselves, but you outside folk best leave us alone.”

Comments are closed.