Donald Trump Orders Strikes Against Houthis In Yemen

March 16, 2025 Hunter Wallace Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Politics, Populists, Progressives, Terrorism, Yemen 31

UPDATE:

I doubt this will end well for him.

I’m not going to spill any tears over the Houthis.

If you are a terrorist group that attacks American ships in order to disrupt the global supply chain, I think you are responsible for your own actions and should prepare for retaliation. The United States would have been justified in retaliating against Israel over the U.S.S. Liberty incident. Trump is equally justified in responding to these attacks on American ships in the Red Sea.

Note: The definition of an activist is someone who is outraged about Israel’s attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in the 1960s, but who supports hundreds of attacks on the U.S. Navy in the present day.

31 Comments

  1. The “Christian Nationalist” reveals his final form: a Zionist neocon who supports waging war on Israel’s enemies. When Trump attacks Iran, you will find a way to defend and justify that too.

    And as for what a “wignat” is: it is someone who actually defends Truth, rather than repeating the lies of the Jewish System, the way that “normal, sane paleocons” do.

    “Wignats” don’t compromise. “Wignats” don’t find excuses for backing ZOG’s action when it is convenient for them. “Wignats” recognize the Houthis and similar freedom fighters are the continuation of the National Socialist struggle in the world today. The Houthis, are the force of light, Zionist America the force of darkness.

    America is evil. America is terrorist. So of course, those who preach loyalty to “America” are, in the end, Zionist snakes who will defend all manner of terrorism that the Jewish entity commits, while slandering those on the Frontline of the fight against such as evil as “terrorists”.

    Reply

    • What is a wignat?

      I would say a wignat is someone who hates Jews and hates Israel. That’s it.

      They don’t care really care about attacks on American sailors or the U.S.S. Liberty. They don’t care about White people. They don’t care about America. They’re don’t care about nationalism or immigration or any other issue. They hate Christians. Instead, they support attacks on American sailors, White people, Americans, so long as non-White Arab Muslims like the Houthis are doing it. They support 10 million illegal aliens flooding into our country so long as they think that they can own Jews in some way by voting for Kamala Harris. They are excessively antisemitic.

      This is why that whole scene collapsed into the black hole of Third Worldism and snuggling up to mulatto pimps like Andrew Tate or Muslims like Sulaiman Ahmed or obsessing over Palestinians and LARPing in Hezbollah t-shirts and slobbering over Lebanon. They love Arabs like the Houthis. They love Lebanon. They love Iran. They love Palestinians. They hate their own country and the people who live here. They are anti-Jewish, not pro-White. They are also not nationalists.

      A nationalist is someone who prioritizes the interests of their own country. These people hate their own country and support attacks on it, or don’t, depending on whether Jews are involved.

      Reply

      • The Houthis see hundreds of thousands of people being genocided in Gaza, and risk their lives to stop it. Despite the extreme poverty and relentless bombing their own nation has suffered, they stand up selflessly against the most powerful forces of evil in the world, in support of their brothers and sisters facing genocidal terrorism.

        How do White people react to the demographic genocide of their own people, at the hands of that same ZOG?

        They sit back and let it happen. As long as it happens LEGALLY. And they think they can VOOT their way out of the worst of it.

        White people have been drugged up and bought off. Potentially, they could be a greater threat to ZOG than some Arabs. But the jews don’t treat Whites the way they treat Palestinians, instead they give Whites the good life. White privilege, in a sense. They even make them think that Jewish interests are White interests, and that trick has worked on most “racist” Whites. Including you, it seems.

        The only exception are, to some extent, Russians, who have remained relatively healthy and unbrainwashed by the jewish narrative, hence the war propaganda against them. The Wagner forces are the closest thing to White Houthis that exist. Still, Trump is working overtime to make sure that Russia is co-opted as well. That is what his supposed moves toward “peace” with Russia are about.

        The current state of the White race is pathetic because of what the jews have reduced Whites too – but there is a growing number of White Zoomers and younger who ARE Noticing, which clearly has jews scared that Whites will not always be the golems. Dinosaurs like you will try to fight back by saying antisemitism is anti-White, but the rise of antisemitism among young Whites is inevitable, and in running cover for the jews you and your ilk will just alienate them further from your dying worldview.

        And when this reaches the boiling point, the forces of jewry will no longer be at peace with the future generation of Whites. It will be war, and you have made it clear which side you would be on.

        Reply

        • You’re making my point for me.

          Wignats are anti-Semitic, but also anti-Trump, anti-White, anti-Christian, anti-American, anti-nationalist. They don’t care about anything except for their obsession with Jews and Israel. They are against Jews and Israel. They are not for anything positive.

          As a result of this, the whole scene has collapsed into Third Worldism and simping for Muslims like Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah while attacking White people and Christians and downplaying other issues like immigration. Politically, it would be hard to create a more ineffective message than this. I hope the Houthis see this comment!

          I’ve had “NS” types tell me my worldview is “dying” for 25 years now. In reality, my politics have never been more mainstream, and their organizations go through the same cycle of making big pronouncements and collapsing from a lack of interest and infighting in the span of two or three years. Remember Charlottesville or the National Justice Party?

          If they are inevitable, what keeps happening to them? Why have they abandoned politics? It doesn’t look like it to me. Man, I have seen WN 1.0 rise and fall, and it rebrand as the Alt-Right, and I have seen that collapse because the same people became the public face of it, and it rebrand as America First, and that collapse for the same reason.

          Reply

          • “In reality, my politics have never been more mainstream” – among geriatric boomers (and the occasional young incel male who won’t reproduce) maybe.

            You say you are for something positive – so are you helping poor White people in your own community? A big part of why Hamas became so popular among Palestinians is because they are the only ones who would provide help to the poorest and neediest among them. The only people I’ve seen suggest Whites do the same things for our own communities are what you would call “wignats”. “Redpilling” a bunch of comfortable middle class boomers about the need to VOOT HARDER never worked for anyone.

          • Yes, we do that at our church.

            Christians have always helped people in need in their communities. I have also participated in things like hurricane relief efforts in Florida. Wignats are so out of touch with reality that they think that charitable acts make them special or that it is something no one else is doing. Of course, they also believe they should get something out of it politically, namely spinning their wheels about Jews.

            “NS” types have always thought the next generation would save them. They said that about Boomers like Robert Mathews. They have said that about Gen X skinheads. They used to say that about Millennial Alt-Rights. They say that today about Zoomers.

        • I was referring specifically to TRS with that one who did a whole show boasting about it. They thought Kamala Harris was going to win Pennsylvania.

          Reply

  2. It’s interesting how quickly things escalated from “I don’t care about Mahmoud getting deported” to “I openly support ZOG wars in the Middle East now”.

    Southern Nationalists were better back when they used to burn American flags and sing “for this Yankee nation, I do not give a damn!” When did Southern Nationalism turn into boomer Amerikwan patriotardism exactly?

    Reply

    • Third Worldists spent days whining about Mahmoud being deported.

      I’m not a Third Worldist. I don’t care about the Houthis. I don’t care about Lebanon. I don’t care that Mahmoud was deported. Everyone named Mahmoud should be deported regardless of whether they are a U.S. citizen and regardless of what they think about Israel.

      The Nationalist Front was by far the biggest mistake that Southern Nationalists have made in recent years. We should have never gotten involved with people who have a fundamentally different worldview. I saw how that worked out for us in Shelbyville and other places.

      Where is Jeff Schoep these days? What happened to Heimbach?

      Reply

      • “Everyone named Mahmoud should be deported”

        Should everyone named Cohen also be deported?

        But frankly, if they were deporting him for his name that would be a less worrying precedent.

        The fact that they are deporting him for being “antisemitic” according to the ADL’s definition is horrifying. It is a further step towards European-style “hate speech” laws.

        Reply

        • I’m fine with that.

          More than anything else, I am sick of wignats saying that issues like immigration do not matter, and what is important is Iran’s interests or what is going in Lebanon or someone named Mahmoud being deported.

          Reply

  4. The reason the USS Liberty incident is significant is because Israel is supposedly our ally. The reason the Houthis and Iran are hostile towards us is because we’re hostile towards them, through our support of Israel. We should want good relations with Iran, for our own benefit. We can get things from Iran (e.g. oil). We get nothing from Israel. They’re a parasite.
    Also, for anyone who isn’t aware, that Charles ‘wotancore’ guy Hunter is repeatedly reposting is Jewish https://x.com/wotancore/status/1892637717130793119 and Hunter already knows that. He’s perfectly fine boosting Jewish narratives that the only reason vessels are being attacked is because the Houthis are “terrorists” and I guess hate us for no reason at all (must be they want to take our freedoms!).

    Reply

      • You are distorting the issue to get an own on “activists.” As the commentor above correctly points out the issue with the liberty was not the outrage of muh fellow muricans being attacked, but that it was done by a nominal ally and covered up by the government. Furthermore the purpose of that attack was a false flag, that failed because they took too long to die, to bait the US into a war for Israel (sounds pretty relevant to the past two decades if you ask me). As for the Houthis they are defending themselves by international law. The US is the AGGRESSOR. Stop with this neocon spin (oh wait I forgot, the paleocons are in control now).

        If anyone is interested in an english assessment of the Houthis and their ideology I recommend Dr. Johnson’s work here: https://www.radioalbion.com/2024/02/the-daily-nationalist-houthi-victory-dn.html

        Reply

        • I just wish people would be honest.

          They actually don’t care about attacks on the U.S. Navy. They just hate Jews and Israel. That’s it.

          This is why they support Houthi attacks on the U.S. military because the Houthis are against “Zionism” and part of the “Axis of Resistance.” If that is your position, then own it. The multiracial “anti-Zionist” movement has nothing to do with White people. Activists have shifted from being pro-White to anti-Semitic. They don’t really care about anything else.

          Reply

          • The Houthis are right and the US Government is wrong. The only people who support this are jews, the us government, and their dogs. The white position is the right position. You don’t get to claim more “pro-white” credibility while taking the wrong position. Same for the deportation of the Palestine activist. Here is Phil Giraldi (not a national socialist) making the point that it is about the first amendment and shutting down speech jews dont like: https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/the-death-of-free-speech-in-america/

            Why cant you just take the right position?

          • 1. No American president is ever going to tolerate pirates and terrorists attacking the U.S. Navy and American shipping.

            2. It is activists who identify with the Houthis because of their obsession with “anti-Zionism.” I would love to see the polling on the issue and specifically what White people think of it. I’m confident that the overwhelming majority of White people in America disagree with activists and do not support the Houthis. Some people are fond of falsely conflating their own views with White people.

            3. You’ve defined “having pro-White credibility” as being anti-Semitic and have subtracted everything else.

            4. Finally, the fact that your activism has become about supporting someone named Mahmoud from being deported or supporting Hamas in Gaza or simping for Hezbollah in Iran or the Houthis in Yemen or Iran illustrates how singularly focused you have become on Jews and Israel, and how everything else that used to matter has been lost. I hope the Houthis see this. White people who see this are going to make a beeline in the opposite direction.

  5. This is one area where HW is partially on target. It is one thing to oppose involvement in foreign wars in general – especially when your own country is being invaded and your own people are being replaced. The ‘activists’ go off the rails here. It is no better to take the Arab side in the middle-east conflict between the Zionist Empire and its neighbors than it is to take Satanyahoo’s side. Staying out of it means opposing the government siding with one over the other. Unfortunately Trump clearly sides with Satanyahoo, and (also unfortunately) far too many Christians do as well. It’s perfect right to call them out on this error – without calling for joining the other side. Over the last week or so there have been several hasbara-types here professing to be Christians while praising our new ‘friends’ – the Synagogue of Satan. Christianity needs to go back to Luther’s understanding of the JQ. Anything less is heresy and/or apostasy.

    Mamoud is not our problem. If he opposes what Israel is doing he should have left the US and joined up with Hamas, Hezbollah or the Houthis. Instead he’s protesting here – yet another ‘Baksheesh Boy’ (the ‘baksheesh’ here being our text dollars) telling the white man to take up his cause instead of taking it up himself – a major reason the Israelis have been winning, by the way. The flip side of this equation is that we shouldn’t be fighting the jews’ wars for them either. I say a pox be upon both of their houses.

    As I explained on the other thread, the Liberty incident is not comparable to what’s happening now with the Houthis and the shipping. Bottom line is that if the US and the EUSSR really think supporting Israel in its clearly genocidal ambitions is great idea, they’d best be willing to bear the cost – which will include acts of war against their ships. The USA has already taken sides. The Houthis are *not* terrorists. They don’t attack any random passing ship. Chinese vessels transit the passage without problems, a demonstration that (unlike the US regime), the Chinese government acts more in the interest of the Chinese that it does in the interest of foreigners. Trump would do well to emulate Xi in this area.

    Reply

  6. The US should be bombing cartels in Mexico.
    Instead it’s fighting the Shia Axis because they’re Israel’s one enemy.

    “They attacked America, they should be retaliated against.”
    They attacked because the US-Israel attacked first. We are still doing the neocon jew routine of fighting Mohammedans. Enough!

    Southerners salivate for Jew wars, have been doing it since before Pearl Harbor, loved the Gulf Wars, loved the War on Terror, what’s the deal down there? Is it the Evangelical crusader larp animating this?

    Reply

    • The U.S. has always dealt with pirates this way stretching back to the Barbary Pirates. The Marines were created to deal with groups like this. Marines were the first Americans to land in Japan in the Perry expedition over trade. The idea that we should just sit back and passively allow terrorist groups to attack our ships and control global trade routes is compelling to activists and no one else. The same activists also laughably pretend to be upset about the U.S.S. Liberty being attacked.

      Reply

  7. At the current moment , US and NATO doesn’t have any means to destroy Houthis. NATO weapons can only hurt Houthis when they ignore safety precautions like Nasrallah and other leaders. Last 2 years have demonstrated that Houthis are modern fighters not old school dogmatics who prefer good manners to efficiency.

    Reply

  8. >The definition of an activist is someone who is outraged about Israel’s attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in the 1960s, but who supports hundreds of attacks on the U.S. Navy in the present day.

    Why is the US bombing Yemen?
    Because Israel.
    Why did the US coverup the attack on the Liberty.
    Because Israel.

    America is beholden to Israel. Trump is beholden to Israel. That is the point. BTW its not “american ships” but specifically american ships enroute to Israel. They also stopped after the ceasefire but have began actions again because the jews, being lying duplicitious murderers, cant help but kill Palastinians despite the ceasefire. So yes they deserve to be hit as they are enabling a genocide. Its the Houthis who are enforcing the Geneva convention here lol. This action is to support Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Trump is Israel first and you understood this in 2018 but now you apologize for it. Furthermore, this is what I meant the other day when I said we are seeing a continuity of ZOG policy. Biden also bombed Yemen, Trump is promising to do more. Brad supports it. Its not too late to stop what you are doing Brad.

    Reply

    • The Houthis are attacking American ships and obstructing a major global trade route in the Red Sea. That’s why Yemen is being bombed. Joe Biden bombed them for the same reason. I didn’t attack Joe Biden for that because no American president can be expected to allow terrorists and pirates to just attack the U.S. Navy which is under his command. It is also the Houthis who made the choice to go down this road and Trump’s response to them was predictable.

      I don’t think terms like “National Socialist” or “White Nationalist” make any sense here. In order to be a nationalist, you have to identify with your own nation and put its interests first. Hitler was a German nationalist. In order to be a White Nationalist, you have to identify with White people and put White people first. Activists identify with Arabs, Iranians and Muslims and other non-Whites like Andrew Tate who are “anti-Zionists.” They put Palestine First, Lebanon First, Yemen First, Iran First. They have become Third Worldists who are just anti-Semitic.

      Reply

      • “They have become…” Actual White Nationalists and National Socialists have been opposing wars in the Middle East for DECADES no matter how “patriotic” the justification was. Do you forget that the invasion of Afghanistan was literally because “they were harboring Bin Laden”? It was never WN policy to support ZOG wars until those pesky “third worldists” came along. Is David Duke a Third Worldist too? He hasn’t commented yet on the latest attack, but he has expressed support for Yemen in the past.

        It’s utterly unreal that you think Hitler would have sided with Zion Don over a group of freedom fighters whose slogan is literally “a curse upon the Jews” because of some retarded notion that “nationalism” means supporting your government. Being Nationalist and especially National Socialist is about supporting the interests of your People, not the “rights” of ZOG capitalists to ship weapons to jews to slaughter Palestinians.

        Also, haven’t you openly said you aren’t a White Nationalist anymore and don’t care about WN? But then you tell White Nationalists that they aren’t really White Nationalists unless they support bombing Yemen, as if you have any right to lecture people on an ideology you don’t even follow.

        Reply

        • I don’t think of wignats as White Nationalists or National Socialists.

          In order to be a nationalist, you have to identify with your own people and prioritize their interests. Wignats are the opposite of nationalists. They hate their own people. They do not identify with their own nations. They prioritize the interests of non-Whites in the Third World. If Hitler had been a wignat, he would have hated Germany and supported foreigners attacking Germans and devoted his attention to the welfare of Third World countries. Wignats devote their attention to Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Yemen, etc. Wignats spent all of last week bemoaning the tragedy of someone named Mahmoud being deported.

          The actual National Socialists shipped Jews to Palestine to get them out of Germany. There is nothing “nationalist” about wignats and they mostly spend their time bashing White people. They also fly off the handle and go on shooting sprees. Again, it is better to just stand for values and avoid labels because labels can be hijacked by unstable bad actors.

          As far wars in the Middle East, Trump has temporarily ended the wars in Gaza and Lebanon, which is a good thing. If Houthis want to attack American ships in the Red Sea, they only have themselves to blame when Trump responds to them. They are not victims.

          Reply

      • Also, it is strange that you go on about being an “ethical universalist”, because of your “Christian values”, but at the same time “don’t care” about Lebanon or Gaza or Yemen or Iran. A “wignat” shooting up a bunch of non-Whites is evil and means all “wignats” must be condemned, but ZOG slaughtering children in the Middle East is justified and only a “Third Worldist” is against that.

        I guess murdering non-White civilians is only evil when those non-White civilians live in White countries, whereas when it is killing them in their own countries, it’s the true White thing to do. Any objection means you don’t care about White people, apparently. Murder is evil when done by a powerless “wignat”, but when done by the powerful Zionist elite, it is fully justified.

        Reply

        • Believe it or not, but this website isn’t about Gaza, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, etc.

          I didn’t create this website because I have humanitarian concerns about non-White people in the Third World. I didn’t create this site to talk the Middle East every day. I’ve never been a Third Worldist. Pirates and terrorists who attack American ships are not victims. They are not being “murdered.” Also, I wrote dozens of articles about Israel’s slaughter of children in Gaza, opposed it, and I am glad Trump put a stop to it.

          Reply

  9. Yes it’s good to draw distinctions between attacking a sovereign nation and attacking rebels who are attacking supply ships. The latter is justified.
    If the ships are merely passing thru and not interfering with local fish stocks or harming a local area in any way, then they ought to just let them pass.

    Reply

  10. This is where I stand on all of this:

    I used to be neck deep in all of the antisemitism. I read Anglin on a daily basis. I listened to TRS. I read dozens of blogs devoted to nationalism of some form or another, and I studied all of the arguments about the JQ.

    Inevitably, when something appears to go “our” way, a naysayer has always been there to remind us of the “kosher sandwich”. In all cases, the argument goes, a Jew is behind the scenes shepherding the flock of goyim in a direction that is manageable for the Jews. This is the argument.

    It’s an argument for which there can be no counter-argument. It’s a presentation of narrative that can always explain away anything and everything. There are no other areas of life that work this way, save for the almighty power of God himself, where every outcome can be explained by one source of power. Jews are literally elevated to a supernatural force with these people. All powerful, everywhere, pervasive in every way. I often wonder if these people lay in bed at night hearing Jewish voices commanding them to do this or that. Why not? It seems to me that even schizophrenia can be blamed on Jewish power if you tie the logic of it all into the knot that it ultimately is.

    Take Stephen Miller. The man has done nothing but good for our cause. He’s more nationalistic and pro-white than most NS “activists”. Yet, I’m to be convinced that in reality, he’s working against my interests, because in some tangential way, he’s only looking out for his Jewish brethren.

    I understand the danger of ethnic nepotism among Jews, and I know the historic problems it has caused. I do not think it unwise to keep them at arms length in many areas. But I will not be blinded by irrational arguments for which no sufficient amount of contrary evidence can ever be presented. This is schizophrenic antisemitism. It is the world of cranks. Count me out.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*