There are multiple angles of what is essentially the same story:
- The UK, Canada, France, Belgium and Australia all recognizing a Palestinian state
- Bibi Netanyahu addressing an empty room at the U.N. because over half of the world has turned against Israel over its genocide in Gaza
- The latest New York Times/Siena poll which recently found that over half of Americans now support ending military and economic aid to Israel
- The catastrophic collapse of support for Israel in Gen Z on both Left and Right
- Liberal Boomers turning against Israel
- Larry Ellison taking control of CBS and Paramount and putting Bari Weiss in charge of it
- Larry Ellison transforming TikTok into ZioTok in a desperate attempt to quell criticism of Israel
- The Gaza peace deal which Trump is trying to force on Netanyahu because Israel is politically toxic and whether or not that is real and will go anywhere
The connecting thread in all of these stories is the deterioration of Israel’s public image. The United States is one of the most pro-Israel countries in the world and even here Americans are turning on Israel. Larry Ellison’s acquisition of CBS and TikTok are a desperate last ditch attempt to stop the bleeding. Trump wouldn’t be pushing for this Gaza peace deal if it wasn’t for the political headwinds.
“Nearly two years into the war in Gaza, American support for Israel has undergone a seismic reversal, with large shares of voters expressing starkly negative views about the Israeli government’s management of the conflict, a new poll from The New York Times and Siena University found.
Disapproval of the war appears to have prompted a striking reassessment by American voters of their broader sympathies in the decades-old conflict in the region, with slightly more voters siding with Palestinians over Israelis for the first time since The Times began asking voters about their sympathies in 1998.
In the aftermath of the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, American voters broadly sympathized with Israelis over Palestinians, with 47 percent siding with Israel and 20 percent with Palestinians. In the new poll, 34 percent said they sided with Israel and 35 percent with Palestinians. Thirty-one percent said they were unsure or backed both equally.
A majority of American voters now oppose sending additional economic and military aid to Israel, a stunning reversal in public opinion since the Oct. 7 attacks. About six out of 10 voters said that Israel should end its military campaign, even if the remaining Israeli hostages were not released or Hamas was not eliminated. And 40 percent of voters said Israel was intentionally killing civilians in Gaza, nearly double the number of voters who agreed with that statement in the 2023 poll. …”
“President Trump on Monday cast his plan for a cease-fire in Gaza as a landmark deal to bring peace after two years of catastrophic violence. But in reality, it was more like an ultimatum to Hamas.
Standing alongside Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, Mr. Trump unveiled a proposal to which both men had agreed. If Hamas refuses to do the same, Mr. Trump said, the United States will let Israel “do what you would have to do.”
“Israel would have my full backing to finish the job of destroying the threat of Hamas,” said Mr. Trump, who under the plan would become the temporary chairman of a board in charge of the redevelopment of Gaza.
The joint appearance by Mr. Trump and Mr. Netanyahu at the White House was a clear display of unity at a moment when Mr. Trump has shown signs of frustration with the Israeli prime minister, and when much of the world has grown horrified at Israel’s prosecution of the war against Hamas in Gaza, which has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians. …”
We will see what happens.
The most likely scenario is that Israel finds some excuse to continue the war. It is possible that Hamas could accept the deal though because the population of Gaza is so desperate.
When has what the American public wanted or disliked mattered to ZOG?
I don’t want my people, White American Evangelical Christians, to be scapegoats for Jewish crimes.
From Louis Brandeis to Jonathan Greenblatt, US government support for Zionism has been a liberal Jewish project, but somehow conservative Christians have been maneuvered into being the patsies, the fall guys, the scapegoats.
Those of us who know what is going on have a responsibility. We can vote for Trump as the lesser of two evils, and we can support him when he does the right thing, but we must make it absolutely clear that we do NOT support his Israel first foreign policy.
Put the blame where it really belongs: Biden’s liberal Jewish cabinet (Blinken, Garland, Yellen, Mayorkas), Jewish supremacist liberal NGOs such as the ADL, and Trump’s liberal Jewish cronies (Jared Kushner, Howard Lutnick etc.)
The widow of Yitzhak Rabin (who was Prime Minister during an attempt to have peace with the Palestinians via the Oslo Accords in the 1990s) blamed Netanyahu for inciting hatred against her husband which led to his assassination.
Background
Final Days of Yitzhak Rabin
https://youtu.be/UFpQOWWDM20?si=1NlKBzh7qOmW2BWX
Netanyahu, Rabin and the Assassination That Shook History | Netanyahu at War | FRONTLINE
https://youtu.be/JhMF30VLZCA?si=x3R8IS5CdNxMr0Ci
Wikipedia: Assassination of Yitzhak Rabin
…The assassination of Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin came immediately after an anti-violence rally in support of the Oslo peace process.
Before the rally, Rabin was disparaged personally by right-wing conservatives and Likud leaders who perceived the peace process as an attempt to forfeit the occupied territories and a capitulation to Israel’s enemies.
National religious conservatives and Likud party leaders believed that withdrawing from any “Jewish” land was heresy. The Likud leader and future prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, accused Rabin’s government of being “removed from Jewish tradition […] and Jewish values”…
Rallies organized by Likud and other right-wing groups featured depictions of Rabin in a Nazi SS uniform, or in the crosshairs of a gun. Protesters compared the Labor party to the Nazis and Rabin to Adolf Hitler and chanted, “Rabin is a murderer” and “Rabin is a traitor”. In July 1995, Netanyahu led a mock funeral procession featuring a coffin and hangman’s noose at an anti-Rabin rally where protesters chanted, “Death to Rabin”. The chief of internal security, Carmi Gillon, then alerted Netanyahu of a plot on Rabin’s life and asked him to moderate the protests’ rhetoric, which Netanyahu declined to do. Netanyahu denied any intention to incite violence.
— Wikipedia: Assassination of Yitzhak Rabin
I asked an AI app about PM Netanyahu’s role in the assassination of PM Rabin:
Grok:
Historical Context
In the months leading up to the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin on November 4, 1995, Israel was deeply divided over the Oslo Accords, a peace initiative that involved territorial concessions to Palestinians. Right-wing opposition, including Likud party leaders, viewed these efforts as a betrayal of Jewish land and security. This created a toxic atmosphere of incitement, with rallies featuring extreme rhetoric and imagery that dehumanized Rabin, portraying him as a traitor, murderer, or even a Nazi collaborator. The assassin, Yigal Amir, a far-right extremist, cited this climate as influencing his act, though he acted alone.
The Specific Rally: October 5, 1995, in Jerusalem’s Zion Square
Yes, the rally you described occurred on October 5, 1995 (about a month before Rabin’s death), organized by rightwing groups including Likud supporters. It took place in Zion Square, Jerusalem, and drew tens of thousands of protesters. Key elements included:
Chants and Rhetoric: Crowds shouted “Death to Rabin,” “Rabin is a traitor,” “Rabin is a murderer,” and “In blood and fire we will get rid of Rabin.”
Imagery: Protesters displayed posters and effigies showing Rabin in a Nazi SS uniform (often with a swastika armband), sometimes combined with an Arab keffiyeh (headscarf associated with Yasser Arafat) or in the crosshairs of a gun. These visuals explicitly equated Rabin with Hitler and the Nazis, amplifying hatred by invoking the Holocaust—a profound taboo in Jewish society.
Scale and Impact: This event is widely regarded as a peak of incitement, contributing to the polarized environment that emboldened extremists like Amir.
Benjamin Netanyahu’s Role
Benjamin Netanyahu, then Likud leader and Leader of the Opposition, was a central figure at this rally. He spoke from a balcony overlooking the crowd, addressing protesters while the inflammatory posters and chants were visible and audible below him. Earlier that year, in July 1995, he had also led a mock funeral procession at another anti-Rabin rally, carrying a coffin and hangman’s noose amid “Death to Rabin” chants.Netanyahu had publicly accused Rabin’s government of straying from “Jewish tradition and values,” framing the peace process as a moral failing. While Netanyahu did not organize the Nazi imagery or lead the chants, his presence and speeches at these events—without visibly intervening to stop the most extreme elements—drew widespread criticism for legitimizing and escalating the hatred. Shin Bet chief Carmi Gillon warned him of assassination plots and urged moderation, but Netanyahu declined, arguing the protests were legitimate opposition. Post-assassination inquiries, including by former Shin Bet heads, accused him of downplaying his role and promoting conspiracy theories to deflect blame.Netanyahu’s Response and Denials Netanyahu has consistently denied inciting violence, claiming he called for change through “the ballot box alone” and silenced some chants (e.g., responding to “Rabin Traitor” by saying such calls “do not belong here”). He has stated he did not see the SS uniform posters amid the large crowd and that blaming him distorts history. However, footage and eyewitness accounts show the imagery was prominent, and critics (including Labor leaders and historians) argue his participation amplified the mob’s fervor, even if unintentionally.
Me:
Didn’t Rabin’s widow blame Netanyahu?
Grok:
Yes, Leah Rabin, Yitzhak Rabin’s widow, explicitly blamed Benjamin Netanyahu for contributing to the incitement that led to her husband’s assassination in 1995. She accused him of fostering a climate of hatred through his participation in inflammatory anti-Rabin rallies, including the October5, 1995, Zion Square rally where protesters displayed posters of Rabin in a Nazi SS uniform and chanted “Death to Rabin.” In a 1997 interview, she stated that Netanyahu “stood on the balcony while they shouted ‘Death to Rabin’ and did nothing to stop it,” holding him morally responsible for not condemning the rhetoric. She also refused to forgive him, saying in later years that his actions during the Oslo Accords opposition campaign helped create the toxic atmosphere that emboldened the assassin, Yigal Amir. Leah Rabin maintained this stance until her death in 2000, and her accusations have been echoed by some Labor Party members and historians, though Netanyahu has consistently denied inciting violence.