Nick Fuentes GOES FULL ZIONIST/NEOCON and says the United States should "dominate the world" and believes massacring millions will be good for the American People.
— RTSG (@RTSG_Main) January 13, 2026
Nick will do anything for a SHEKEL! pic.twitter.com/OLoQpC2AOO
Lots of people seething about the Venezuela operation are traitors.
— Fuentes Updates (@FuentesUpdates) January 13, 2026
“Why? Because Trump didn't ask Ilhan Omar for permission? Because he didn't go to the United Nations and beg Burundi and the Central African Republic?” pic.twitter.com/WfHGQXBnKh
“We will take what we want. Nobody can stop us. And we'll do it again. And I hope we do. And I hope we do it in Greenland. And I hope we do it in Panama. And I hope we do it in Cuba.”
— Fuentes Updates (@FuentesUpdates) January 13, 2026
-Nick Fuentes pic.twitter.com/BDJmcQUDpe
Nick Fuentes CALLS OUT the low-IQ antisemites crying about Trump attacking Venezuela
— ????????? (@ImperiumFirst) January 13, 2026
"We will take WHAT WE WANT—If you've got a problem with that, you can go back to Pakistan." pic.twitter.com/T4gTKhVvbJ
Nick says he was shocked at the response to the ICE sh??ting, and that people need to toughen up.
— S.clips (@whitesocksclips) January 13, 2026
"There will be more of this before this is over. You think any of these people would cry if ICE di?d?" pic.twitter.com/Olzhih7coP
NO ONE CAN STOP US pic.twitter.com/ocJp0fgE8r
— S.clips (@whitesocksclips) January 12, 2026
Nick Fuentes makes fun of Renee Good and people defending her
— ????????? (@ImperiumFirst) January 13, 2026
"Look at her stupid fucking pumpkin-headed bitch face—one less stupid bitch in the world" pic.twitter.com/sUgN2grdR9
If I was a Democrat, I would be cheering on Nick Fuentes.
The Democrats already plan to push for DC and Puerto Rican statehood when the pendulum swings back and they return to power in Washington. They would pick up four Senate seats.
Imagine what the world would be like if these retards got their way and Trump conquered Venezuela, Greenland, Cuba and Canada and forced these countries to become part of the United States. Greenland would be worth two more Democratic senators, Cuba and Venezuela would send four Democratic senators to Congress, Canada would produce at least 10 more Democratic senators.
Assuming the United States remains the same, the demise of the Voting Rights Act and the 2030 Census should shift power in the House and the Electoral College toward Republicans. How would the House be reapportioned though in a scenario in which Venezuela, Cuba, Greenland, Canada, DC and Puerto Rico have become states? How would this shift the balance of power in the Electoral College? Do we want all of Canada, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Cuba and potentially Mexico voting in our elections?
What sense does it make to celebrate the ICE shooting of Renee Good? The only thing that accomplishes is to poison public opinion against ICE and immigration enforcement. The next Democratic president will “defund ICE” and usher in millions of more illegal aliens to overwhelm and flip Texas.
Trump, Fuentes and MAGA are on a power trip and don’t see how it could backfire and end badly for them. They are consumed by imperialist hubris.
Warren Balogh and Striker have noted that Nick suddenly started appearing everywhere around August, right around the time the Venezuelan op was being planned out. Google Trends seem to support this. “The Most Censored Man in America” is completely dominating the algorithm on YouTube and TikTok. The whole thing reeks of Bannon.
When it’s all said and done though, Little Nicky will be tossed aside, possibly have his finances come under scrutiny from a future Dem government.
I remember he was featured in a New York Times article. Then suddenly he was everywhere and the face of eveything.
It’s like magic! Before too long we’ll see Swishy Nicky doin’ the smooch in the Pride Capital of the World.
Andrew anglin is the most censored.
Crazy times.
Technically, Nick isn’t incorrect. He’s a fed too(who isn’t nowadays) But a sick man cannot project health. A diseased nation can only spread sickness. America First was supposed to improve conditions at hone before attempting to project power abroad. I guess that plan’s out the window. Lol! This is a suicidal regine committed to gambling everything with a losing hand and potentially taking us all down with them. The Kirk thing didn’t work. If it hadn’t been handled so poorly and clumsily it would have led to some level of social cohesion with Erika Kirk serving as some kind of “high priestess”/ moral cudgel to get the proles in line. But it failed. Miserably. What’s next? Civil war 2.0? A false flag nuke in Kiev? Trannies infiltrated bu fed kidnapping and murdering children like moslems did in Beslan?
On the senseless killing of Renee Good…pure insanity. What threat do two goofy looking women pose to any man with common sense. Yes, they shouldn’t have been there…but honestly can that retard seriously believe his life was in danger? Things have to looked at non-autistically. Just because you can do something legally doesn’t mean you should do it. I bet his workmates are all asking themselves “What the f*** is wrong with Jonathan?” Stupid idiot ruined his life for nothing.
The ICE agent (who should not have been on the street in light of what happened to him a month or two ago – dragged over 100 feet by a moving car driven Antifa or an invader) has internal injuries so it wasn’t as portrayed by gaslight media, who will try and do to him what they did to the cops who were there when St. George of Fentanyl croaked of an overdose.
Imagine my complete gobsmacked shock and amazement, if you possibly can. Perhaps he can now join Lady G’s senatorial staff, with a special chair funded by Paul Singer – another real “traditionalist”. Clown World on full display.
A Christian Nationalist supporting Golden Circle 2.0 in the spirit of antebellum Democrats was an (un)surprising development. History tends to rhyme.
“A Christian Nationalist supporting Golden Circle 2.0 in the spirit of antebellum Democrats was an (un)surprising development. History tends to rhyme.”
Correct. I’ve tried to rhyme this to Hunter and others who try to claim America was historically not imperialist, specifically mentioning the attempts to annex the Southern republics as was the goal of the Golden Circle. Either Hunter isn’t aware of it, isn’t aware of the KGC, or ignores it.
Hunter takes a lot of positions that are against the grain and history of his Southron ancestors and people. I would say if history rhymed in this scenario, Hunter would be one of the founders of the State of Jones trying to kill his cousins so as not to fight the invading Yankee blue bellies.
Hunter Wallace should change his name to Newton Knight. In fact it’s our assessment this has been the plan of Hunter’s Trotskyite friends all along. To manupulate him a kind of modern day Newton Knight inside the online right, and turn O.D. into an online Free State of Jones.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_of_Jones_(film)
You heard it here firstest with the mostest.
We discussed the Knights of the Golden Circle years ago here and the whole idea was premised on slavery and white supremacy. The Trump administration is committed to neither of these things and annexing Venezuela or Cuba would simply saddle us with another Puerto Rico. It could be even worse if the Democrats abolish the filibuster and transform these countries into states. Puerto Rican independence and repatriation is a much better idea.
Oh, yeah. Right. I remember now. So, how are you not finishing the equation of the KGC and American annexation of the Caribbean with Imperial Colonialism. Or, just as well, looking into the Westward expansion into relatively highly non White populated areas as not equivalent to expansion g the European powers. Note, the British settled the West Indies with Whites, which became non White thru cheap labor Black slavery, settled Canada, settled Australia, settled New Zealand, and settled South Africa, and the French settled Algeria, Tunisia, and the Italians did the same to Somalia, Eritrea and Ilhan Omar’s country of Somalis. In fact, her grandfather served with the Italians.
What I am pointing out is the difference between Imperial Commercialism, or the Empire of Commerce as Jefferson called it and what you appropriately called the Empire of Liberty which is seof governing settler communities. But, you seem to think that taking the late 19th century American expansion was Imperial Commercialism, when it was in fact the last gasp of Imperial Colonialism. The US just didn’t have a system anymore to bring enough White people to settle the islands of the Pacific and Phillipines or Cuba.
So, in fact the US did have an imperial policy. It seems your difference is whether it involves annexation and settling with Americans, i.e. White people or aka Imperial Colonial Settlerism. Fair enough. But our foreign policy and national interest doesn’t simply stop with whether we are annexing or expanding to promote White Colonial Settlerism.
The US engaged in covert action, espionage, assassination, and landed troops throughout North Africa for a period of roughly 30 years with no intention of ever settling the area. The campaign which arguably was the longest in American history and gave the President the authority to use all sorts of things you would find abhorrent didn’t end until 1956 or so. That’s America’s longest war and it never involved settlers.
My point is you seem to promote a rosy tinted history of America in which Americans magically sprouted out of the ground as an angel spread her wings across the West saying Manifest Destiny. Perhaps that did in fact happen in the heavens, but as the Lord’s prayer says, as in earth so in heaven, it began with using the same instruments of power you now degry Trump using.
So, is your opposition simply the instruments of power the use of that power or the objectives of that power? Because to say it’s bad because muh Imperialism, and we never did such a thing whatever your definition of it is, the fact is that isn’t true. You gotta come with a better argument because right now it doesn’t fit with historical fact and makes it seem you are against Trump’s use of power simply for pacifistic or in American reasons. I am just trying to figure what is getting your goat on this.
As Richard Haass notes in his book, Americans chose to annex and settle sparsely populated, adjacent territories that could be quickly settled by our own people. Expansion was not imperialism. All of the lower 48 states were admitted to the Union as equals. We also debated annexing all of our neighbors – eastern Canada, Cuba, Mexico, the Dominican Republic, the Philippines – and chose not to for racial and cultural reasons. Expansion stopped because it ceased to be desirable. America also spent the entire 20th century building and defending an international order which was based on criminalizing territorial conquest. The Gulf War was caused by Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait.
@Hunter Wallace,
“As Richard Haass notes in his book, Americans chose to annex and settle sparsely populated, adjacent territories that could be quickly settled by our own people. Expansion was not imperialism.”
Haas conveniently points at the Mexican cessation as an example. But he leaves out the Treaty of Paris which recognized our independence and sovereign over the entire modern US East of the Mississippi. The new areas outside of the 13 colonies included 1,000,000 Indians which increased the US population by 20%. The Phillipines by contrast increased it by 5-10%. No different.
Then their are the annexations of East and West Florida and the Louisiana purchase. All involved substantial non White or foreign White populations. For goodness sakes, parts of Louisiana are still speaking French to this day and have networks all up and down the Mississippi.
“All of the lower 48 states were admitted to the Union as equals.”
Yeah. But what was there before the States were organized by American settlers. They were American territories we had either purchased or conquered or both. None of the States ever existed as independent States except a few noteworthy exceptions. All the others existed as foreign European colonies or Latin American countries.
“We also debated annexing all of our neighbors – eastern Canada, Cuba, Mexico, the Dominican Republic, the Philippines – and chose not to for racial and cultural reasons.”
That has nothing to do with it. As I’ll say again all of the territories outside of the 13 colonies were inhabited by foreign racial and cultural groups. Some were sparsely populated others were not. But we still annexed them. That happened because the national leadership was united in its determination to spread the Empire of Liberty aka Imperial Colonial Settlerism. That unity broke down toward the middle of the 19th century die to sectional competition of the Yankees seeking total commercial and political domination of the country and refusing to give the Southrons any chance to expand southward. We easily could’ve annexed the other Latin states, made them territories, settled them with Americans and basically did to them what we did to Louisiana and New Mexico.
True, we debated annexing all of Mexico and refused it because of all the non Whites. We took the least populated and debatable Northern part which was majority non White, and overwhelmingly non-American. Arizona was still heavily Indian and Hispanic all the way up till WWII. New Mexico was Whiter, but today isnt owing solely to American settlement which took several generations to complete.
The Phillipines couldn’t been annexed. Ratio wise it was no different than taking the Transmissippi East. The problem was we were already retarding our demographic expansion thru cheap labor immigration and the old State and community associations that had made Manifest Destiny were shattered by the Civil War or spent by that time.
To get it going again it would’ve taken a Federal government effort to get it going again. That could’ve been done, as it was the Federal government who subsidized the initial Westward expansion. But by the turn of the 20th century we were dominated by Laissez Fair libertarian corporatists and so that went nowhere. McKineky made one effort to change that when it failed in Congress is when he changed direction toward securing it and preparing for eventual independence.
“Expansion stopped because it ceased to be desirable.”
Ceased to be desirable for Yankees. They basically ran out of their kind and refused to allow Southrons to replace them on the demographic front and or get new socioeconomic opportunity. Southrons we’re still crippled by the demographic and economic effects of the Civil War. Immigration was also making things difficult for downstream Yankees so there were internal problems.
The Yankee leaders could’ve fixed this by redirecting immigrants and organizing Yankees and Southron colonial expeditions to Cuba, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Pacific Islands, and Phillipines. That was the hope Roosevelt envisioned but the moment was passing by his time and again Congress backed by northeastern Yankee corporatists blocked it, because Commercial Yankees weren’t into that. They just wanted to accumulate capital and party like degenerates which they did on a grand scale to our country’s detriment.
“America also spent the entire 20th century building and defending an international order which was based on criminalizing territorial conquest. The Gulf War was caused by Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait.”
100% true. I’ve spent the greater part of my time and career trying to push reality onto the dumb dumbs in policy to abandon such quaint ideas. Even going so far as to encourage such territorial activities since it would blow out the neo-Liberal world order.
Look, the ideals weren’t necessarily wrong, bad, and might’ve been good for their time. But the West stopped executing let alone building it’s military and hard power necessary to defend that world order long before you were born. It’s been a fiction that has hamstrung us for years, discouraged various reactionary waves of European movements to reclaim their day in the sun, discouraged Americans from doing the same-go ask Don about that-and generally tied one hand around our balls as the facts on the ground were reshaping the territorial lines anyways.
I am glad Trump has finally sh!tcanned it with Greenland. The last thing we need is some Eurocommie dictatorship controlling Greenland and linking up with TruedeauCommie Canada and bridging to the bloody Chinese mofos. Good for Trump! Meanwhile, once we be certainly restored the demographic situation inside the US we could move back to making Col Walker’s and other fillibusters dreams a reality.
I mean Panama has only about 2.5-3 million actual Panamanians of which about 10-20% are of American origin. We could settle a couple million White Americans there, turn the Indians (10%) onto reservations, and presto we would have a majority White American territory in Latin America. With some adroit politicking, educating, allowing Panamanians to settle inside the US, we would turn it into a White American state a kind of Spanish origin Louisiana in Central America. So the same in Nicaragua. Rename it Walkeryia and place a giant statue of him in the rotunda of the new capital. He’s be proud.
Note, his was the gasp of your own patrilineal family’s rise of expansion. You don’t know it yet, if you ever will, but Walker was backed by them and also the last spy agency the US had until the CIA. It was already on its last legs, budget cutted, it’s headquarters disbursed, Yankee inspired Congressional investigations, Presidents burning records, the diplomatic service paralyzed movements afoot saying it was a Masonic inspired Satanic society. But Walker made one last gambit to complete his mission and hopefully unify the country in a spirit of national patriotism if he died. He never expected to be betrayed like he was by Cornelius Vanderbilt who sold him out to the British who didn’t want Americans interfering with their canal they planned to build. Tell me again how we lived in beautiful isolationism and American States magically appeared out of land which had a few Indians on it back then Hunter?
https://www.tiktok.com/@unrecalledhistory/video/7494703775756700971
Also, we are not annexing Cuba, Venezuala or whatever. That is hysterical leftwing nonsense to work rightwingers into a tizzy. It’s ridiculous to even think that is Administration policy. Desperate attempts at psyopong the rightwing.
Trump is claiming we need need a “title” to Greenland. He wants to make it a U.S. territory. The obvious path back to power for the Democrats is to make Puerto Rico and DC into states. They could also push statehood for the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Pardon for the incomplete link, corrected
(Lousy “touch screen” here, I’ll never get used to this nonsense.)
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/theyre-getting-front-something-democrats-make-abrupt-pivot-screaming-free-palestine
You need to take everything on ZioHedge with a grain of salt.
Right, I’m aware of it.
I want maximum wealth, power, territory, and security for the American people. The real question is, HOW do we obtain these things?
The traditional American answer, the correct answer, is nationalism, NOT imperialism.
Colonialism, NOT imperialism.
George Washington, NOT Julius Cesar.
In 1759, Benjamin Franklin was AGAINST annexing Guadeloupe for a good reason.
In 1798, the British offered John Adams territories in the West Indies and the East Indies if America would join them in a full scale war against France, Spain and the Netherlands. Alexander Hamilton wanted to accept this offer, but Adams wisely refused. Instead, Adams waged a limited war against France to obtain a strictly limited objective, freedom of the seas for the American merchant marine.
Liberia could have been founded as an overseas territory of the USA, just as Sierra Leone was founded as an overseas territory of Great Britain. Instead, the American Colonization Society wisely decided to found Liberia to be an independent country.
In 1848, there was a movement to annex all Mexico. James K. Polk wisely refused.
The early Republicans wisely opposed the filibusterer schemes to annex Cuba and Nicaragua.
During Grant’s presidency, patriots wisely thwarted a scheme to annex the Dominican Republic.
Grover Cleveland wisely refused to go to war against Spain.
William Jennings Bryan wisely campaigned for Philippine independence.
Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge wisely rejected the interventionist legacy of Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Harding and Coolidge didn’t pull out of Latin America, but unlike Roosevelt and Wilson, Harding and Coolidge at least didn’t initiate any NEW interventions.
In 1956 Eisenhower wisely refused to support the British/French/Israeli scheme to seize the Suez Canal. Even at the height of the Cold War, Eisenhower preferred to allow a Soviet client state to nationalize the most valuable, the most strategic property in the world, rather than risk getting dragged into the Middle East quagmire.
All of these wise decisions played an important role in America’s growth from a string tenuous colonies on the Atlantic seaboard to a global superpower.
A sprawling multi-ethnic American empire might not have survived the French Revolution or the Civil War; it might not have won World War 2 or the Cold War.
America’s common race, language, religion, political traditions, and economic conditions gave us an underlying organic cultural union which healed the wounds of the Revolution and the Civil War, so that a united nation could gradually grow into the world’s largest economy. Our lack of overseas ambitions enabled us to lead the whole world during the World Wars and the Cold War, by allaying the fears and jealousies of our partners
To the extent that America indulged in imperialism, it has been a source of weakness, not strength. The Philippines were a strategic Achilles Heel during World War 2. Puerto Ricans vote overwhelmingly Democratic. The anomalous constitutional status of the Virgin Islands made them the ideal headquarters for Jeffrey Epstein’s blackmail operation. In 2016, the establishment Republicans could have used the delegates from Commonwealth territories at the Republican national convention to block the nomination of Donald Trump. If, God forbid, the Commonwealth territories ever became states, the Democrats would have permanent unassailable super-majorities in the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Electoral College. We, the intellectual vanguard of the American Dissident Right, might all end our lives in solitary confinement in the dungeons of Guantanamo Bay.
To the extent that the territorial expansion of the American nation is truly desirable, it could ironically best be achieved by REJECTING multi-ethnic imperialism. It is necessary to exalt the moral standing of the nationalist ideal, for both humanitarian reasons and also for reasons of cold self interest.
Nationalism is necessary for us to recolonize our own homeland via the re-migration of the unassimilable post-1965 immigrants. It would be a great help if Venezuela, not the USA, became the primary magnet for the rootless economic migrants of this hemisphere. For this reason alone, we never should have imposed economic sanctions on Venezuela.
Furthermore, the nationalist idea can cause the breakup of the artificial multi-ethnic construct known as “Canada”. If Quebec manages to liberate itself and assume its proper stature among the independent nations of the world, America can then annex the only truly desirable foreign territories, mainland North America west of the Ottawa River. Nova Scotia could be an Anglo-Canadian rump state for those who reject being part of the American nation.
If Greenland was a fully independent and fabulously prosperous Eskimo ethno-state, it would be a magnet for the other Arctic islands. This would impose further pressure for the breakup of “Canada”. If Greenland really does have the world’s greatest mineral resources, it might be best for Americans if the Greenlanders themselves monopolized the profits.
Only American ideals and American methods can make America great again. It should be obvious to every patriotic adult American man that Thomas Massie is right about foreign policy, and Jeff Sessions (and his protege Stephen Miller) is right about immigration. That is where we should plant our standard, and never retreat a single inch for any reason whatsoever.
If, in his heart of hearts, Hispano-Italian Nick Fuentes is a Roman, not an American, then he should literally move to the city of Rome in Italy and try to make Rome great again. Benjamin Franklin’s nation is not Julius Cesar’s nation. We are part of the same family of nations, and we can respect the good qualities of the Romans, but Americans are frankly better than the Romans and I’m tired of pretending we’re not.
And if Nick is reverting back into the adolescent Neocon that he was in 2015, then he needs to finally grow up and become an adult man with stable principles.
” American Colonization Society ”
Oh, bring it back, plz.
Your take on the impact of new states on the voting landscape is spot on. When all the 51st state stuff started my sister called me in a panic (she has severe TDS) and I told her that it was bluster as they have always stopped PR and DC to be states for the same problems that adding Canada would cause, and even if Trump wasn’t smart enough to figure that out, his donors and party members would. However, you have the insanity of him saying it many times, saying he wants all of it a state, and at the same time in 2025 he also repeated the long worn line that he didnt want PR and DC as states, so in what kind of world does it make any sense to turn those down but add, electorally, another California to your election problems as a GOP’er? Then throw in the other areas, Cuba etc. and while would have a far less impact on the House, the Senate would be a disaster, and in elections where each electoral vote count, that could be an issue if the swing states don;t go his way. It always seemed to be an unforced error on his part, at least offer Territory status first, he was a Democrat a lot more of his life than a GOP’er, maybe he’s reverting to the mean.
He changed his mind quickly. Wasn’t Fuentes always anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist?
> Wasn’t Fuentes always anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist?
In a word – No. He played one on the Talmudvision while collected lots of shekels from idiots. That’s different than genuinely being opposed to such things on principle. Swishy Nicky just took a page from The Art of the Grift by Donnie ‘Thuglife’ Trumpenstein.
Nick is an AstroTurf Monsanto hybrid farm bot. His purpose is a spoiler. To usurp, and either coopt or destroy rightwing groups not under the control of his masters. The latter are not Jews, they are people like Bannon and the Papacy. They are determined that the rightwing remain dominated by Papists. Period.
I said earlier Nick would pivot to a more mainstream conservative even neo con stance. Right on cue he has done so with regard to the recent crisis developments in the third world.
Lots of the neo-Groypers will have to come to grips with their support of Nick. My assessment is they will dutifully follow, because most are Papists and they follow heiarchy and are gay. But there will be some who will fall away. Overall the Neo Groypers will be a spent force with only a small cadre left and vectored into the Con Inc to ensure the grip of Rome. All foresaw and foretold by me here at OD.
Sigh. But, I gotta say it, TOLD YA. I’ve been saying for months that Nick was going to pivot to mainstreaming his image after he did is media coming out tour. It was all planned before hand in discussions with him. Everything I said about him has come true. To bad I wasn’t able to remind you in the last week or so because of having to defend the obvious need to take out the international Caliphate.
I think it’s totally hilarious though to read bot farmer WU’s apologist response to Nick’s transformation into a a Mestizo Papist version of AGB, a kind of mysceginated Nitchsean Warmonger. I wonder where November is aside from sucking Nick’s balls? You will see more of this as about 92.5% of Nick’s Twitter engagement is bot farmer responses from the Third World. So, reading the responses of people who called me a Hasbara Troll cuz I supported more aggressive responses to Sand N@ggers, now defend Trump cuz Nick does so too is sweet. It tastes like total victory. But it’s empty. Like Cotton candy.
It reminds me of a nightmare I once had of going to Chicago. I stopped by O’Mally’s sports bar. When I walked in at first I felt I was coming home to my friends old stomping ground from when I was young, when the beer flowed, White guys and a few White gals got together and commiserated over watching football.
So, I was elated when I walked toward it hearing the cheers and laghter from the inside. When my eyes cleared seeing on the TV screens the Chicago make a touchdo and everyone inside wearing Bears sports jersies was chest bumping each other, and saying in pure Chicago accent, “Yes, we are the champions!”, screaming “Da Bears!” or saying some other words. But everyone was either a N@gger, a Sp!c, a Towlhead, or a Chink. I thought I had come to hell.
Swishy Nicky the Nietchsean Warmonger. Perhaps he and Lady G can dance the War-Waltz in the soon to appear Golden Ballroom, followed up with the Battle Boogey-woogie. Peak Clown-World – Honk-honk-honk!
A real “trad catholic” there. One good thing you can say about Musloids is that they usually deal with folks such as Swishy Nicky, Lady G and Paul Singer in a efficient manner.
Who?
Go influence yourself.
“Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge wisely rejected the interventionist legacy of Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Harding and Coolidge didn’t pull out of Latin America, but unlike Roosevelt and Wilson, Harding and Coolidge at least didn’t initiate any NEW interventions.”
Their stupid imperialism allowed the Mafia anti Americans to take over the Mexican revolution and eventually seize the entirety of what remained of billions of dollars of investment on Mexico and underweight a camoaign of degringoizing Mexico which drove many people of American ancestry back into America thereby blessing us with the Romneys. Bad move.
There stupidity extended into Central America which allowed local mafias to take over American plantations thereby forever infecting those companies with their ilk which lasts to this day. Our problems in Venezuala, Colombia, Panama, Nicaragua, Honduras, and El Salvador are just echoes of those bad decisions by Harding and Coolidge and later FDR.
“In 1956 Eisenhower wisely refused to support the British/French/Israeli scheme to seize the Suez Canal. Even at the height of the Cold War, Eisenhower preferred to allow a Soviet client state to nationalize the most valuable, the most strategic property in the world, rather than risk getting dragged into the Middle East quagmire.”
Eisenhower upon reflection and seeing the absolute disaster his move caused by igniting decolonialism said it was the biggest bone headed move of his entire career. That’s also the biggest understatement of all time since Suez literally initiated colonization of the West and leading to Hunter being rammed by an illegal alien and the Western US practically lost to the American people, let alone the extinction of thousands of European settlements in the third world, the destruction of Algeria, Rhodesia, South Africa, Angola, Mozambique and others as well as the rise of Sand N@ggerusm. We are still in the Middle East alternately fighting directly or indirectly just to keep the whole place from forming a united front which would overrun all of Europe.
No these were not wise decisions. They were decisions of moral cowardice, motivated by short term economic self interests generally about lowering costs. Allowing to let the third world run over US has been the policy of not just the US but the British and French as well. At least the later tried to fight it off for awhile. Not us, our isolationist Right just embraced it and then morphed into two parts, a neo liberal commercial elite that sought to make money by compromising with third worlders and a neo isolationist Right which has collectively been insane ever since.
Welp, the beatings have obviously improved moral for Nick Fuentes. As I predicted he has come back around. But, I always knew he would because I read the program. Sigh, my true fav, Hunter, still is giving off the strong Jimmy Carter vibes, though. Dissident Right OD is getting left behind like I said it would if it continued down this path.
Hunter, it’s a clear identity choice of yes or no.
“Would you support American interventionism in return for ending immigration.”
Or
“Would you support ending American interventionism in return for continuing immigration.”
The answers of yes or no to each one will determine whether you are American First, America Unsure, or American Last.
It isn’t an either/or issue. For example, there were/are legitimate reasons to deal with the Maduro regime in VZ, one of which has hardly been mentioned here at all – the massive worldwide election-fraud racket being run from there. As I noted previously, didn’t anyone find it ‘odd’ (to say the least), that the two firms (Dominion and Smartmatic) responsible for something like 90% of the voting machines were produced and run out of a third-world dump like VZ? Even HW’s senator Tuberville has raised this issue. VZ was directly involved in the ‘Caravan’ invasions of the US (as are Columbia, Mexico and – possibly – Cuba). That’s not imperialism but really self-defense.
You naturally totally neglect (as always) to mention (((who))) has been holding the doors to Europe wide open for the decades since the Suez adventure – the (((very same folks))) who left the gates of Spanish cities open for a Muslim invasion force in the 700s. While the Poofter-Nostra papacy is indeed a guilty party to the crime, along with most of what passes for Protestantism (the Anglicans are at least as bad as the papacy – maybe even worse) – they didn’t start pushing the great replacement until Vatican II (which actually marks the total apostasy of the Vatican) though they were already soft by the time Vatican II delivered the lethal blow.
One size does not fit all. Concentrating on our own backyard is not a bad idea as long as we don’t start falling into the folly of setting up colonies. Your and Fuentes’ neo-klown doctrine is to invade the world and invite the world at the same time. Fuentes was fake-and-gay from the outset so there’s zero surprise about his 180-degree apparent turnabout. It isn’t actually a turnabout at all. It was always his real position since he’s just another parasitic foreigner who should be stripped of citizenship and expelled.
Yeah, I don’t think celebrating that dead bulldyke is going to really matter much after the euphoric, orgiastic celebrations and mocking over Kirk that continue to this day. It would have been ideal if the GOP actually did something to avenge his death and deal with the previously unforeseen levels of radicalization on the left, sure, but spitting on some hideous lesbian (blatantly egged on by her “wife”) who gave her life to keep Zoomali rapists in the country? After 4 months of the bloodlust and sadism over Kirk?
Shouldn’t leftists be concerned after countless millions of them across the globe showed themselves to be functional (at minimum) sociopaths? That they signaled “we hate you and want you dead” like never before? I guess not because of how little the GOP did, as usual. The optics on the lead-up to the muff-diver’s death are atrocious. Much worse than Kirk being murdered sitting there debating college students.
These are people who think any immigration enforcement is a mortal evil and anyone who participates it is on par with a serial rapist. I can’t believe you’re handwringing over making light of one worthless, nigger-worshipping piece of shit after what these animals have done with Kirk and how they want to continue the work of a nation-destroying kike like Mayorkas and the senile child molester he hid behind.
Agreed. How is her death any more questionable than all the nigs who defy law enforcement and end up “finding out”. Just another Darwin Award winner, and good riddance!
Fuentes appeared back to back to back on a whole bunch of shows a few months ago, amongst which Tucker’s but also Sam Hyde of MDE.
Looked completely astroturfed. I remember hearing Nick Fuentes’ voice from some biking boomer’s portable radio (specifically a segment about how he woke up to the JQ) while I was out working in a rather upscale area, was totally surreal.
WE’LL DO IT AGAIN
NO ONE CAN STOP US
Not so fast…
Germany joins European partners with troop deployment to Greenland
BERLIN, Jan 14 (Reuters) – Germany will send 13 soldiers to Greenland on Thursday as part of a reconnaissance mission with other European nations, the German government and defence ministry said on Wednesday, following demands by President Donald Trump for Washington to have control of the island.
The mission, which comes at the request of Denmark, will take place from Thursday to Saturday, aiming to explore possible military contributions to bolster the security of the region, a defence ministry statement said.
This could, for example, include maritime surveillance, it added.
Trump has repeatedly said in recent weeks that Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark that is strategically located and rich in minerals, is vital to U.S. security, and that the United States must own it to prevent Russia or China from occupying it.
He has said all options are on the table for securing the territory, rhetoric that has severely strained relations between Europe and the U.S.
Earlier Wednesday, Sweden and Norway announced that they would send military personnel to the island…
“Empire in Decline”: Historian Alfred McCoy on U.S. Aggression in Venezuela, Iran & Beyond
https://youtu.be/xwmGlMPsyIY?si=iNkLQVZ5tlG2XFXj
(McCoy thinks J6 was a coup so he leans Left a “little” but he says some interesting things.)
Stupid Danes. All they need to do is rename Greenland as ‘Epstein Island’. That way Cheetohead the Clown would stop all mention of it.
Nick Fuentes Goes Full Neocon Imperialist
Who?
End the war(s). End Reconstruction.