David French: My Fellow Republicans Must Stand Against the Alt-Right Virus Infecting America

I spent about an hour last night listening to David French whining about being ridiculed by the Alt-Right on the ERLC podcast. I had no intention of writing about it until I saw that he regurgitated pretty much everything he said in a sanctimonious new Time article this morning.


“In the immediate aftermath of the El Paso shooting, a raging argument broke out online and across the airwaves. Given that the suspected shooter used one of Donald Trump’s favorite words to describe illegal immigration–invasion–did that mean Trump actually inspired one of the worst mass killings in American history? And if his words inspired violence, can we blame other politicians on the left and the right when depraved killers repeat their slogans and messages?

It’s elementary to understand that the use of deliberately inflammatory rhetoric–especially in an angry, polarized era–can have terrible consequences. At the same time, however, arguments about specific politicians are much too simplistic. In fact, in the white-nationalist context, it actually understates the extent to which “alt-right” ideas and themes have infiltrated American discourse in ways that have energized a fringe movement and given it life and reach beyond the Oval Office. …

As strange as it may sound, to focus on the President is to think too small. The old virus of white nationalism has been injected into our culture in a new way, and it’s imperative that we recognize its symptoms–including its language and ideas–and react with the energy and commitment to banish it back into the irrelevant margins of American life.”

Challenge accepted.

Listen to David French’s voice in the podcast. As I listened to Pastor French, I found myself thinking that he sounds like a eunuch. You can hear the physical weakness and softness in his voice.

French sounds like one of the Emperor Honorius’s eunuchs:

“At that time they say that the Emperor Honorius in Ravenna received the message from one of the eunuchs, evidently a keeper of the poultry, that Rome had perished. And he cried out and said, ‘And yet it has just eaten from my hands!’ For he had a very large cock, Rome by name; and the eunuch comprehending his words said that it was the city of Rome which had perished at the hands of Alaric, and the emperor with a sigh of relief answered quickly: ‘But I, my good fellow, thought that my fowl Rome had perished.’ So great, they say, was the folly with which this emperor was possessed.”

Procopius, The Vandalic War (III.2.25-26)

This is how we see mainstream conservatism.

David French is a modern day version of “a keeper of the poultry.” He owes his position as a columnist in the mainstream media to his proximity to powerful elites. The price of his proximity to power is that he is an utterly useless and ineffective champion of his own constituency. The reason that people like French are hand picked and promoted as thought leaders is because they are losers. The Left needs a respectable professional loser as their controlled opposition and to legitimize their victories.

David French isn’t animated by any of the causes that drive the Alt-Right. He isn’t concerned about the total collapse of immigration enforcement on the Mexican border. Instead, he is worried that you might call over a million illegal aliens pouring across it unopposed an “invasion.” He isn’t concerned about the restriction of thought and speech by political correctness. Instead, he is concerned with policing your tone. He isn’t concerned about Big Tech using its monopoly power to crush dissent from the mainstream elite consensus. Instead, he is worried that Facebook and Twitter might be regulated by the government. David French thought the Mueller Report “should shock our conscience.”

David French is all over the map depending on the elite conventional wisdom of the moment.

In May, French was citing gun rights as his primary defense against the Alt-Riight charge that mainstream conservatism has conserved nothing of value. By August, French was calling for Minority Report-style red flag laws. A week ago, French wrote an article condemning Sen. Josh Hawley’s effort to regulate Big Tech called “Against the Republican Daddy State.” A week later, French was calling for liberal judges to have the power to arbitrarily seize your guns.

French likes to adopt the pose of a highly principled and moral “classical liberal,” but he shouldn’t be taken seriously. He defends Israel’s right to use deadly force to secure its own border while simultaneously decrying the hysteria about the caravans in the United States. He thunders about federal civil rights laws which are utterly inconsistent with classical liberalism. He believes the federal government should declare war on White Nationalists and that the power of the state should be used to strip us of our constitutional rights for having similar albeit milder beliefs on race than the Founding Fathers.

David French is famously out of touch with the conservative base:

These are only some of the most risible French takes over the past few months.

We are enjoying the challenge posed by French. It is a good thing that we have someone as transparently weak and ineffective as David French declaring war on us. Ultimately, it will be people like French who are discredited and banished to the irrelevant margins of American life. I’ve written dozens articles about him because he is the avatar of the literal professional cuckservative loser.

Is David French going to secure the border? Stop abortion? Stop social media censorship? Stop child drag queens? Stop political correctness? Stop anti-white hatred? Is he capable of addressing any of the grievances of conservative base? Does anyone believe it is plausible that French is capable of winning on any major political issue? No, his instinct is to tone police the base and call them racists. He is there to fight us while preserving the status quo and gracefully losing on all these issues to the Left.

It is no accident that young White people don’t want to sit there and listen to David French and Russell Moore’s milquetoast liberalism. There is an ongoing exodus from the Southern Baptist Convention. That’s because there is nothing compelling to young men about Judeo-Christianity as it is presented by this duo. It comes across as a gospel of weakness and effeminacy and worshiping Jews. Young men would rather play video games or do just about anything than listen to that shit.

Martin Luther, John Calvin and John Knox sounded nothing at all like David French and Russell Moore. Protestantism grew when it was radical. It has wilted under liberalism. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times. David French is one of the weak men leading us to hard times. Hard times eventually end up creating strong men as dissolution gives way to a popular revolt against it. And, strong men will inevitably be reviled by weak men like David French as they are shoved aside.

It has to be done though. This is a necessary step.

When the Left calls us names, we will just laugh. We won’t collapse into a seizure of disavowals and apologies like mainstream conservatives.


“There is a category of lowly man
Intoxicated by his own brand
Of valiant salvation for
Those lowly outcasts, meek, cash-poor
This worm sees in minorities
A proxy for his purity
The perfect opportunity
To show his deep immunity
To any selfish, racist cause
Like enforcing domestic laws
Those can be altered as niceness dictates
Anything to root out hate!
Root out the immigrant’s opposition!
Commence the liberal inquisition!
Those redneck fools deserve to languish
The worm blames sloth for all their anguish
Heritage nation, consumed by vice!
You just need to be more nice!
The global south deigns to redeem you
Be grateful, for they generate revenue
For the masters you’ve failed to serve
Those men, the worms, who pose to conserve
Those values you have clearly lost
This is the Capitalist Pentecost
Submit to the modernist’s spirit of avarice
Defer now to the mocha-skinned Lazarus
Know this, you are more rich than him
If not in cash, then in your white skin
The worm is possessed by cool-kid perception
Considers himself a great exception
To all those evil, racist whites
Whose recalcitrance impedes his rights
To trample on their spirit more
To profit from the endless wars
And from the labor multiplied
And from the masses demoralized
Who still turn to the worm for guidance because
For America, he professes love
Not for her people (those, he hates)
They are but low-life reprobates
But for what nation she could be
If she increased her liberty
And turned her unscathed, generous face
Toward parasites that “earn their place”
And spread her ample, gentle thighs
For those who come and tribalize
And offered her abundant breast
To those who maybe pass a test
And even those who don’t, you see
Deserve a similar amnesty
For their natural state is to conserve
Just like the posture of the worm
Unscrupulous venality
A winning slave morality”

About Hunter Wallace 12381 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. “virus” used by AOC and French.

    Lots of biological metaphors by people who normally abhor the simplest biological insights about race.

    Don’t hold your breath to hear from these the word “parasite” used for a certain tribe.

  2. I am telling you they are off the Muslim kick and are now on to attacking whites. Why did David French and all those filthy disgusting Irish attack Muslims so strongly and for so long? What on earth have Muslims ever done to David French or the Irish? Why do they attack some one who never did them any harm? Are they animals? Only an animal preys on the weak and the innocent. Only an animal.

    The Jew must not show himself and his true nature, the animal. The Jew hides behind his Irish henchman and his egg headed whores like David French. Ask them why they act the innocent. As them weather or not they are civilized human beings or animals. Ask.

      • When? How long ago? Anything in your life or in the recent past? Cromwell was financed and encouraged by the Jews. Why hasn’t that stopped the Irish from cozying up to the Jews now? Because they are whores? Is that it?

  3. French is the true definition of Operation Mockingbird. Does anyone take this guy seriously? I don’t know myself because twitter sent me to ovens (phone number, IP address) permanently. Does anyone on Twitter debate him anymore? He looks like a creepy pedophile with his ugly looks, bald head and his black adopted accessory (look at me, I’m not racist). I wait for the day his black accessory turns on him like a savage pit bull turning on its owner.

  4. David French: Self hating White anti-White. There are no one more despicable and pathetic than Whites like David French.

    • They deserve to be expelled from the civilization that their forebears built. They are trying their best to destroy it.

  5. Virus? It’s like they have talking points originating from the same source or something.

  6. “Peaceful” El Paso TX…as of 2017 had a higher violent crime rate than the national average.

  7. From the Time magazine article; “it’s elementary to understand that the use of deliberately inflammatory rhetoric-especially in an angry, polarized era-can have terrible consequences.”

    Could Time possibly be referring to inflammatory rhetoric lip such as “white privileges,” “straight white male,” “implicit bias,” “white’s don’t have a culture, ” or Trotsky’s favorite epithet “racist” ad nauseum. And that’s not including Bill Clinton,Joe Biden, and Ilhan Omar chopping at the bit for the day Whites are a minority in the nation they founded, built, bled, and died for?

    What Time magazine and every other “mainstream ” media outlet and establishment politician intentionally omits is is also glaringly obvious-diversity isn’t our greatest strength but the source of conflict, and that calling somebody or something “racist” isn’t a form of debate but used to silence honest debate of politically taboo issues. Take for instance POC violent crime against Whites that if the script had been flipped would be called “hate crimes”

  8. David French is all over the map depending on the elite conventional wisdom of the moment.

    Is David French going to secure the border? Stop abortion? Stop social media censorship? Stop child drag queens? Stop political correctness? Stop anti-white hatred? Is he capable of addressing any of the grievances of conservative base? Does anyone believe it is plausible that French is capable of winning on any major political issue? No, his instinct is to tone police the base and call them racists. He is there to fight us while preserving the status quo and gracefully losing on all these issues to the Left.

    As has always been the mission of Northern conservatism. To wit:

    “It may be inferred again that the present movement for women’s rights will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent, Northern conservatism. This is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is to-day one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will to-morrow be forced upon its timidity, and will be succeeded by some third revolution, to be denounced and then adopted in its turn.

    American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism [Leftism, in today’s vernacular] as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt hath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It always—when about to enter a protest—very blandly informs the wild beast whose path it essays to stop, that its “bark is worse than its bite,” and that it only means to save its manners by enacting its decent role of resistance. The only practical purpose which it now subserves in American politics is to give enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it “in wind,” and to prevent its becoming pursy and lazy from having nothing to whip.

    No doubt, after a few years, when women’s suffrage shall have become an accomplished fact, conservatism will tacitly admit it into its creed, and thenceforward plume itself upon its wise firmness in opposing with similar weapons the extreme of baby suffrage; and when that too shall have been won, it will be heard declaring that the integrity of the American Constitution requires at least the refusal of suffrage to asses.

    There it will assume, with great dignity, its final position.” -R.L. Dabney, Women’s Rights Women

  9. 1. Who wrote that poem?
    2. I looked up the word Cuck in the dictionary and it had David French’s picture by it!
    3.Politically neutered! What a great term for modern day conservatives! I see the memes coming on now like a white tornado!
    4. Liberalism does to a nation what AIDS does to a body. Unlike regular AIDS political AIDS has a cure if caught in time and that cure is a healthy dose of National Populism!
    5. In the meantime quarantine all those infected and let them die off and inculcate our people with National Populism.
    6. The Ethno-State resolution sis the only solution!
    7. Forget not the sixteen words: Resistance is mandatory. We will not be assimilated. The existence of our race is non-negotiable!

  10. Nice fedpost.
    Do this and the local Juvanka appointed US Attorney will indict your a$$ for ethnic harassment.
    Good work Special Agent Jack Ryan!

Comments are closed.