Liberal Larry: Don’t Stop Wearing Your Mask. Ever

Do you know how conservatives like to open carry their guns as a fashion statement in places where there is no threat to their own security to express their sense of identity?

The Atlantic:

“Yesterday, the CDC announced that fully vaccinated Americans can stop wearing masks in most indoor and outdoor places. The new guidelines still advise the fully vaccinated to mask up when entering certain public areas, such as doctor’s offices.

This is a moment to celebrate. It is not quite the pandemic’s equivalent of V-E Day; after all, thousands of people are still dying around the world each day from a virus that, far from surrendering, may be endemic. But it could be the closest we get to a formal announcement from the federal government that, after months of death and sacrifice and ingenuity, something has been won. Call it normalcy.

If you’re surprised by the agency’s free-your-face announcement, you’re not alone. State officials had no idea it was coming. Businesses were caught off guard. Even White House officials were reportedly surprised by both the timing and the substance of the new advice, according to CNN. The CDC is notionally in the business of offering public-health guidance …”

There are a lot of people who are feeling confused and betrayed right now.

Liberal Larry feels the same way about wearing his mask outdoors in high temperatures. He is devastated by the end of the pandemic and the news that Joe Biden made yesterday when he said that people who have been vaccinated like most progressives don’t have to wear masks anymore.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


      • I can no longer tell parody from crazy leftist talking points.

        Also I refuse to watch a video of a grown man wearing a pink snow hat.

        At this point in history when someone claims to be a leftist I believe them at face value. I also consider them the enemy. So I wish nothing but suffering upon them.

        • @aldasfail – Is it a snow hat or is it one of those “p-ssy hats” feminists wore to march on Washington to protest the election of Donald Trump in the 2016 election? The march was supposedly a response to Trump’s “grab her by the p-ssy” remark.

  1. The real issue is the vaccines don’t work. See the Bill Maher and NY Yankees stories from today.

  2. The commies are all saying that those of us who haven’t been vaxxed and aren’t wearing masks are a threat and so the mask laws should remain. I keep seeing them say this in comment sectiona even though liberal leaders like the governor of NC are ready to eliminate the mask laws now that Trump is out of the WH. The commie idiots don’t realize that the fake crisis was mostly about defeating Trump. And it worked.

    • The same people that were conned by Blumph were conned by fauci and the liars in the media. There is no pandemic, there is no “covid”, all they did is rename the flu. It was all orchestrated by Fauci and the pharmaceutical industry to roll out a unsafe vaccine and the sheep bought right into it. It’s all about the money and who is getting rich off these hoaxes.

    • Trump defeated himself.

      Donald J. Trump
      8:55am May 14, 2021

      Isn’t it incredible that because of the vaccines, which I and my Administration came up with years ahead of schedule (despite the fact that everybody, including Fauci, said would never happen), that we no longer need masks, and yet our names are not even mentioned in what everybody is calling the modern day miracle of the vaccines? Without the vaccines, this world would have been in for another 1917 Spanish Flu, where up to 100 million people died. Because of the vaccines we pushed and developed in record time, nothing like that will be even close to happening. Just a mention please! The Biden Administration had zero to do with it. All they did was continue our plan of distribution, which was working well right from the beginning!

  3. So I am to assume I am already banned here because I questioned why a commenter would have a good friend who was a rabbi?

    I guess I have moved farther to the right than most. I get banned from amren because I give no quarter. I get banned here even faster.

    Well enjoy your readers with their rabbi “dear friends” I have nothing to learn from here except that most of you are fools.

    • @ aldasfail, calm yourself, thee host of this site is really cool, i dont think he would ban anyone, unless they needed to be banned. This is a southern intellectual site, good manners will take you far, try to remember, its better to make friends than enemies, you can disagree with people, but save thee insults for those , we war with.

  4. @aldasfail:

    Maybe it’s because to date, you only come here to post hateful, divisive CRAP questions about liking or respecting good people (and there ARE good people from every race and religion) despite not liking the circumstances beyond their own control; i.e. being born (Fill in the Blank).

    Its like assuming that because the Puritan Protestant sect executed suspected witches in Salem that ALL Protestants are witch hunters. That ALL Catholics still burn heretics at the stake because the Catholic Church’s inquisition did. Etcetera, ad nauseum, ad infinitum.

    The poster likes a rabbi who might be a warm, charming, trustworthy, helpful neighbor even as he doesn’t care for the self-serving subversive antics of Organized Jewry which has several different branches.

    I see no cognitive dissonance in that.

    Moreover, for some weird reason, OJ may have determined that an atavistic hatred and distrust of Whites (and even acting on that as some sort of preemptive strike) may be good for Jews, but WE don’t see where alienating decent, law-abiding Jews and other Non-Whites of good will is good for Whites.

    You never responded to my last post to you. Why must you equate Pro-White activism with hating Non-Whites and Non-Christians rather than anything to do with loving our own racial family and preserving what we hold dear?

    David Lane’s Fourteen Words say it all:

    “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.”

    Why is this considered hate speech? More important, why do YOU consider this hate speech? Where does it say that, to do this, we must execute or oppress Non-Whites? Yet that’s the way Non-Whites interpret this even as they follow White Flight all over hell’s half acre like a band of demented stalkers.

    WE understand that other races want THEIR children taken care of and a viable future secured for them, but other races seem flummoxed and downright upset that WE want the same for our OWN.

    So, NO. We Pro-White activists of the White race are NOT haters, but we ARE increasingly annoyed at the interference from the others when we try to do anything constructive for our own.

Comments are closed.