Roissy’s name has popped up here on several occasions, but I still know little about him, or why his site is of so much interest to the racially conscious community. I took a look at his blog a few weeks ago and came away with the impression that it was devoted to sexuality. From what I saw, Roissy’s insights into game and superficial, materialistic American women has the ring of truth, so this won’t be a critical post. Even around here (the Bible Belt), sexual mores have coarsened considerably since I was in high school (late 90’s). Case in point, my best friend’s 16-year-old step-sister has slept with over 35 guys. I’m told this is normal for a girl her age.
In this case, I can’t fault Auster for his revulsion at this kind of degeneracy. He correctly argues that this kind of social destruction is liberalism (or radical freedom) taken to its logical conclusion. It is the utter collapse of restraint: superficial relationships based on “excitement,” baby mommas, transmission of STDs, cads instead of dads, children dumped off on the grandparents, low investment reproduction, and let’s not forget miscegenation. What is this but a society in an advanced state of decay? This loathsome state of affairs is the ultimate indictment of liberal-progressivism.
Naturally, the question arises as to how White men (in particular, those who prefer to settle down and start families, or “Betas” in Roissy-sprache) are to navigate this moral sewer. Roissy’s strategy takes account of the facts on the ground and at least can be said to be adaptive. Some men will retreat into spiritualism; others like George Sodini are driven to homicidal madness. Not a few race realists and anti-Semites have fallen back on taking non-White wives from more traditional cultures. Most of us try to get by in this sexual environment (which is increasingly difficult) without compromising our principles.
A moment of honesty: feminism, the sexual revolution, the emergence of a “sexual marketplace” along the lines of free market capitalism, in which men have to respond to “market incentives” by becoming more efficient players, women more efficient whores … this is about the strongest argument for Hitler and National Socialism that comes to mind. The mind wanders back to the Third Reich (or some other substitute) when women were ladies and men were gentlemen. I have little doubt that this is fuel for radical political movements like White Nationalism. In the coming decades, as sexual mores deteriorate further still, probably even more so.