It should be more accurately called the “hook up” scene. I spent the better part of yesterday evening/last night witnessing the demoralizing superficiality and gullibility of young women. Normally this doesn’t bother me, I’ve become acclimated to it, but this one incident in particular left me despairing for the future of the fairer sex. I found my more mature, adult instincts uneasily revolting against my sexual appetites. I remain unsettled by the experience.
Young women these days have been stripped of all culture, taste, and refinement. The last traces of respectability are quickly vanishing. It is harder and harder to find a mate who is intelligent, somewhat interesting, and isn’t a whore. Increasingly, I find myself entertaining the dark thought that women are only good for one thing, which is sex. Most of my friends have already arrived at this conclusion.
Hence, this post. Young women are suckers for cads. They deliberately seek out exactly the guys who are most likely to use them, treat them like shit, and dispose of them. They all entertain the same fantasy of being able to control males of this sort; often times in full knowledge of what they are getting into. The unfortunate issue of these “hook up” relationships grow up in broken, low investment, single parent households. I’ve lost count of how many times I have seen this happen.
As these women grow older, most of them divorced with small children in tow, they morph into gold diggers. They are unable to hold their marriages together because their expressivist, “me first” attitudes rebels against any form of restraint. So they end up pinning their hopes on landing a rich guy with an established household; the sort of men they would have overlooked ten years earlier.
Really, it is sad. Any of this sound familar?
I enjoy moving in different milieus. I like having a few highly extroverted friends in real life. OD is my introverted outlet.
I’m sure. As for the rest…well??
“Mark IJsseldijk:
Motherfuck off.”
Kindly have your mental breakdowns offline.
Hunter Wallace:
Enjoy the ‘free’ pussy. Make sure you wear a rubber, so you don’t get caught in the pussy trap.
That said, you are best looking close to home to find the younger sisters of your good friends, someone who shares your particular class and background without ‘issues’ and who wants to raise children living the same sort of life you both grew up in.
That means that you cull out drunks, dopers, sluts, nutcases and anyone who is not compatible with your family and friends. By all means know who you are wanting to marry and that may take a year or so. By all means, pick someone you can be comfortable with and want to live with and can trust to have children with. Just as there is no ‘royal road’ to learning, so too is there no shortcut to choosing someone worthy of having children with and living together for the rest of your life.
You might have some women in mind, like the younger sisters and classmates of your friends and family.
Pastor Martin Luther Dzerzhinsky Lindstedt
Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri
http://www.whitenationalist.org/forum
“Francis Marion Braidfute:
Is it possible, you guys are digging your own holes?. Why is your priority ‘attractiveness’? instead of character or loyalty, or honour, or faitfullness, or sincerity???
Why do you follow the brainwashing dictum, for whom you should find attractive? If you know they are brainwashing you with concepts of ‘whiteness’; how come you don’t know that they are brainwashing you with concepts of ‘beauty’?
I gave up on zirchonia’s a long long time ago. And I found myself my rough cut blue diamond, whom to me is the most beautiful, gorgeous man alive. Because of his character, and his values. He is truly a blue diamond thoroughbred. A treasure.”
Let me guess, the point at which you started looking for your rough diamond is the same time you started looking older and less attractive to the bad boys? What a convenient morality.
The perception of beauty is not from brainwashing. It’s been established that infants can perceive and prefer beautiful faces. Symmetry and smooth, clear skin being two of the most important factors.
“Hunter Wallace:
My cell phone has been buzzing all evening. The girl my best friend was screwing last week is tired of his shit. She wants to hang out with me now. I’m not really keen on seconds.”
This is going back to my previous statement about predators. Guys like your friend ruin or contribute negatively to the potential relationships of better men, such as yourself.
Typical story… the girl wants a good man, a superior man, once she has tainted herself with inferiors.
“In terms of qualities, she is a 5/9: attractive, good in bed, has a good attitude, lives close by, and likes to have a good time. Not smart, interesting, or respectable; doesn’t have money/career.”
How is she not smart? Are we talking high school dropout?
I should have referred to you as a none-thinker.
So you would explicitly define the process of thought, and its expression, by the moral teleology it proposes? Which would make all classification of phenomena worthless, thus all science. A habit of mind fit for an under-thinker! 😉
Guys like your friend ruin or contribute negatively to the potential relationships of better men, such as yourself.
I doubt his friend has contributed to a general adaptation by females, or even that female. She wouldn’t have been involved with him if she were better, simple as that.
I simply disregard your attempts at showcasing the psychic apparatus as, well, worthless. Boring, you might say.
“Typical story… the girl wants a good man, a superior man, once she has tainted herself with inferiors.”
Typical story: The American girl wants a beta as soon as she satisfies herself with the alphas. Because not only will her fading looks make her less attractive to the alphas and reduce her value on the market, she might also want kids for which a provider-beta is more suitable. Unfortunately, too many betas obligingly play along with this scheme.
Since there are some people here who are enamored with Nietzsche, remember that he and others have noted that marriage is incompatible with a life of true deep-thinking and philosophizing:
From Schopenhauer’s “Of Women” —
— FROM: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Of_Women
H. L. Mencken’s book IN DEFENSE OF WOMEN is worth a read, too: http://www.prismnet.com/gibbonsb/mencken/defense/
Kindly have your mental breakdowns offline.
Fuck you, loser. I’ve tolerated bullshit from you and your ilk far too much.
Mark, the other one, imagines himself at the vanguard of pro-white politics. He’s a moron. He thinks, like the retard jew-fellator FB, that being some kind of jew-whore will make WN respectable. LOL! What a stupid fucking conceit! Hey dipshit, we’re all peasants in the eyes of our masters. And your ignorant bullshit won’t change that. Have fun being a thrall/jew-whore for the rest of your life. Cunt.
Btw, “Mark” is from VNN. As soon as this misfit realized the VNN’ers wouldn’t tolerate his bulshit he jumped ship and, quick as Pan, he became an anti-anti-Semite. What a piece of shit, it doesn’t surprise me in the least that this disgusting excuse for a “human being” is posting here. Bla, bla, bla.
You care about the “quality” of WN? Why not start with yourself, you ingrate maggot?
Hey guys … this is a good thread. Let’s not turn it into a pissing contest.
Mark,
Cads have always been around. There is nothing we can really do about them. I’m pretty sure their behavior is biologically hardwired.
Give uh the hookup, it’s the right think to do.
Is commenter ‘uh’ the same person as ‘wintermute’?
I am not aware of wintermute’s previous writings because I am rather new to the pro-White/White nationalist ‘scene,’ but do ‘uh’ and wintermute seem similar?
Richard Spencer of Takimag is now a Nazi, his hopes of reproducing are dashed:
“…as revealed by Andrew Neather’s recent tell-all column in the Evening Standard, when the Left, even the moderate Left, concocts immigration policies, it’s all about race. As a friend remarked to me this weekend, average conservatives may not be interested in race, but race is interested in them.”
http://www.takimag.com/sniperstower/article/unilateral_disarmament/
I thought Wallace was Wintermute, and that NeoNietzsche was David Duke. Oy vey.
“uh” is definitely not wintermute. He is Marshall Lentini/Sudaka. I have met NeoNietzsche in real life. I might actually meet “uh” offline in a few weeks.
I misjudged Richard Spencer.
I’m beginning to wonder if I’m uh’s sock puppet. Nothing…makes…sense…anymore. 🙁
Mark,
Let me guess, the point at which you started looking for your rough diamond is the same time you started looking older and less attractive to the bad boys?
Was that a question, or have you already made up your mind? The answer is no, i looked for character from a young age. When I was 19, I met an incredibly beautiful woman, in her 30’s, who lived in the same block of flats i did. We became friends, becuase she thought I noticed her, at the pool, but did not fawn over her. She was curious why not. i eventually found out she was an escort. She was so beautiful, and her beauty had brought her only misery. She wished she wasnot beautiful, that if it is was possible, she could meet a man, who would love her for her character, not for what she looked like. I thought allot about that, and spent allot of time observing men around her; and the type of men who were attracted to her beauty, she was stunningly beautiful; and I concluded in agreement with her that her beauty was a curse. The men she attracted were unbelievably superficial, and totally uncapable of an intellectual conversation with a woman.
What a convenient morality
Appears it was not a question, you have already made up your mind? Let me guess: Have you ever met an honourable woman? When you meet a woman, and you are in doubt about a statement that she makes, where she could be sincere, or not; do you always assume, the worst of her? what if you met one that was being sincere, and you have programmed yourself to only interpret evrything she says, by the lowest interpretation possible?
The perception of beauty is not from brainwashing. It’s been established that infants can perceive and prefer beautiful faces.
I was talkiing about ‘conscious’ individuals; not unconscious babies, whether infants, or psychological and emotional infant adults. I am quite capable of telling you Charlize Theron, and Brad Pitt are symetrically ‘good looking’; but there is a difference between a symmetrical observation, and a conscious decision, about character and values, and qualities of a persons personality; about what consists of a beautiful person; and people I consider worthy of my time and effort, emotions and ideas.
If you find that attractiveness works for you, and you meet quality girls, worth spending time with, who value you, not just as a walking penis, but your ideas, your dreams, your values, your fears, your humour…. then I’d advise you to stick to your formula.
But if your formula is not working; why do you keep repeating it, only to get the same result? I was lucky, someone gave me the idea, when I was young, and questioning, that there were many different values, to create a formula from. Sure I run into the majority, if not 90% or more, for whom my formula don’t work, cause they are into Symmetry and I am into character. 😉
Sounds like Hunter is a real chick magnet. He better be careful or he might make Roberto Lindsay green with envy. I believe Bobby claimed to have slept with over 100 women. Better get cracking Hunter this is about bragging rights!!
Mark IJsseldijk,
You clearly need anti-psychotic medication and extensive psychotherapy.
I’m not “from VNN,” I occasionally looked at the site and forum during the past 3 years. It’s where the losers and mental defectives go to rant. It exemplifies everything that is wrong with white nationalism. I never had a bad opinion of the movement until I experienced the banality, degeneracy and anti-social behavior typical of VNN forum members and Linder. They’re the real ‘kwans.
You have no argument so you create straw men and go on vulgar tirades. I am not and have never been philo-Semitic.
Hunter, I encourage you to disallow profane posts that have no merit.
This is great. Not the facts, b/c that sucks, but the fact that someone has put it out there! The facts are depressing, and I think you did a good job of voicing these problems with the society we live in. Not to sound as if I’m trying to be “cool” by stating this statement, annonymously; but now being 27 years old, I never had any trouble getting the girl. However, since I reached my mid- and later-twenties, I began looking for “life-long material”. I quickly realized that this girl is nowhere to be found! (And to further explain the statement I made earlier, I did not mean that I “got girls” as in one nights or the such. I actually had girlfriends mostly. And really shyed away for 3 years or so, after finding out a long relationship ending secret my ex had). Anyways, back to my comment. I just thought I should acknowledge this writer for bringing up, and out to the surface, what I see is probably the biggest problem in our dating culture now.