It should be more accurately called the “hook up” scene. I spent the better part of yesterday evening/last night witnessing the demoralizing superficiality and gullibility of young women. Normally this doesn’t bother me, I’ve become acclimated to it, but this one incident in particular left me despairing for the future of the fairer sex. I found my more mature, adult instincts uneasily revolting against my sexual appetites. I remain unsettled by the experience.
Young women these days have been stripped of all culture, taste, and refinement. The last traces of respectability are quickly vanishing. It is harder and harder to find a mate who is intelligent, somewhat interesting, and isn’t a whore. Increasingly, I find myself entertaining the dark thought that women are only good for one thing, which is sex. Most of my friends have already arrived at this conclusion.
Hence, this post. Young women are suckers for cads. They deliberately seek out exactly the guys who are most likely to use them, treat them like shit, and dispose of them. They all entertain the same fantasy of being able to control males of this sort; often times in full knowledge of what they are getting into. The unfortunate issue of these “hook up” relationships grow up in broken, low investment, single parent households. I’ve lost count of how many times I have seen this happen.
As these women grow older, most of them divorced with small children in tow, they morph into gold diggers. They are unable to hold their marriages together because their expressivist, “me first” attitudes rebels against any form of restraint. So they end up pinning their hopes on landing a rich guy with an established household; the sort of men they would have overlooked ten years earlier.
Really, it is sad. Any of this sound familar?
A major problem in the modern USA is that there is a paucity of places for quality White women and White men to meet each other face-to-face.
The whole modern bar/club scene is mostly pathetic. Pay a tab (sometimes), go in, pay 5 dollars a bottle for cheap beer, stand or sit around with shitty blaring music, walk around or dance a bit or just sit and watch people dance, attempt to talk to some hot chicks but you can’t even hear them talk over the overly loud music, and so on. A freaking bore the lot of it. It’s difficult to truly meet quality women in places like that; most of the White American women who go very often to bars/clubs are slutty and unstable anyhow and aren’t even worth meeting or sleeping with unless you like fucking sluts.
Going to a big bar or club occasionally isn’t all bad, but if it becomes a compulsive every-single-weekend type of habit then its a problem. I recommend that White men ought to try and meet quality White women in lower-key bars in better areas with a more upscale (i.e., White) clientele, or more chilled-out lounges/restaurants, or places like coffeehouses, bookstores/libraries, local gatherings like festivals or speeches or town meetings and the like, on college campuses, in church, or parks, in some places of business, and so on. Anywhere except the godawful clizubs of the cities where they blare rap or pop so loud it gives you a headache.
The USA really does need more places for young White Americans to congregate, mingle, and search for potential mates. If you could come up with better ideas and build them I’m sure you could make some money off it — “If you build it, they will come” — maybe like pro-White lounges or bars minus the whole degenerate Negrofied atmosphere of most bigger American clubs or bars with its blaring rap music, sloppy drunks, and desperate sluts?
I’ve thought starting bigger nationalistic pro-American/pro-White ‘beer halls’ where political-type speeches can take place and we can propagandize the White working and middle-classes and gain their trust. As it stands now, most bars just blare shit music for the idiot masses who sit around get massively overcharged for cheap booze and then drink themselves in to a stupor, with many getting busted on the way home for DUIs. Thus, having more White Americans come to a better beer hall type environment and getting them more exposed to pro-White/nationalistic speeches, question and answer sessions, and White group organization would be good — people are easily propagandized when they are under the influence. There are a whole lot of empty big-box stores all around the USA, and in Whiter suburbia these could easily be converted in to beer hall type environments with picnic tables and secondhand furniture where we could make pro-White speeches, show pro-White films, pass out pro-White flyers and pamphlets, and just generally try to bring the middle/working class White American masses on to our side. And we wouldn’t massively overcharge them for cheap shitty beer-swill in those places either.
A whole lot of American bars/clubs in larger cities and even in bigger towns are often owned by Jews; Jews have been in the alcohol/tavern business for hundreds of years now, and they still are in many places. I avoid those places like the plague and stick more to smaller bars, often located around colleges/universities, with more White patrons where actual conversations can take place, and also where they serve decent beer (good ales) instead of American-made pisswater lager.
“Well, for one, each of them is somebody’s little girl. I don’t suppose you have any daughters.”
What is this sentimentalism? I still don’t know why you feel sorry them. Do they want to go out with you guys? Is that why they keep calling you? Usually, having sex with strangers isn’t a way to gain respect.
I don’t have kids and I’ve never been married.
No, he is only interested in White girls. We share the same racial views. He is pretty much apolitical.
And yet, you’re still friends with this guy, and you condone “game” yet resent the outcomes. Sounds contradictory to me.
Understanding how to attract women is one thing, using that understanding maliciously is another.
Don’t forget, part of the reason women are slutty is because of men like your friend… social predators, sociopaths.
Ho, ho, ho. Turning the natural urge to procreate into “sociopaths” and playing right into the hands of modern females by accepting their frame.
Should read “sociopathy.”
In addition to all that I wrote above, look for women who hail from the countryside or small towns rather than the so often degenerate urban areas.
#34 – Yosemite:”What we need to do is start a pro-white religious community…”
Now you’re talkin! See —> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVWcptE6UAI
Trying to save a people from themselves is not an easy task. The topic under discussion here obviously touches a raw nerve in all of us. This is because the current, intolerable & deplorable state of social & sexual relations between white men and women, is such a huge part of the national breakdown, that we are all forced to endure on a daily basis. Add to this witches brew the alien cultural influences distorting the situation, and the compromised legal/political system, that totally corrupts and compounds family relations, and it’s no wonder whites aren’t organizing ethnically, or reproducing. These are just some of the reasons that the Anglo/white world is self-destructing, and in a pessimistic and indifferent frame of mind.
There are good people out there, though admittedly they are hard to find. I would suggest going to the bourgeois ‘tea parties’, and try meeting the better women there of like mind and kind. A good, loyal white mate or fiancee is solid gold, in a world of fiat people.
I’ll let you fellows in on a secret…….
Go for the fat chicks. They aren’t getting much attention so they’ll worship you and she’ll bend over backwards,(or any other way you’d like) to satisfy you in bed! If you’re choosy(and you can be), you can even find a rather pretty one with perfect skin and a good personality. If she does ever lose weight and you’ve treated her well, chances are pretty good she’ll reward you with continued fidelity. Forget the barbie dolls. Once you’ve been treated like a king by a fat chick, you’ll never be burdened by the abuse of magazine slick, American whores again!
Read this thread, it’s pretty good:
Jonna, thanks for that display of female logic. Be sure to tell your fellow feminists that you dutifully recited the cowshit about how feminism won me all sorts of freedoms by raising my taxes, wrecking the school system I had to grow up in, convincing everybody in this country that even the smallest commitment can be tossed aside at whim, abolishing the chivalry that used to keep women safe from violence, and using litigation to force unqualified women into jobs where they can imperil my safety.
Since you’ve already imputed all sorts of beliefs to me that I’ve never expressed, and seem to genuinely believe that I said them, I see no point in trying to answer your ravings. You’ll just fantasize that I said something other than what I did again.
As for being a feminist, it’s obvious that you’re straight. Nobody can date women without realizing how utterly evil they are.
http://malechauvinist.blogspot.com/2008/03/why-i-am-male-chauvinist.html
“Ho, ho, ho. Turning the natural urge to procreate into “sociopaths” and playing right into the hands of modern females by accepting their frame.”
Straw man.
Maybe you missed the part where he said his friend preys on naive girls and has no concern for their feelings. That has nothing to do with procreation.
“Understanding how to attract women is one thing, using that understanding maliciously is another.”
“When the woman comes along who demonstrates virtue that is the day I will be a faithful gentleman with regards to women. Until then, I will remain a cheerful and unrepentant cad.”
Lead by example.
#59-Intruder:”Go for the fat chicks. They aren’t getting much attention so they’ll worship you”
Terrible advice from a dumbduck troll.
If a chick is fat that means she has little respect for herself. I’m not talking about chicks with a little extra padding, because women naturally/biologically have a higher body fat percentage than men, but rather the real FAT CHICKS. Meanwhile, the chicks who are too thin via starving themselves are often unhealthy, intensely neurotic, and even infertile.
If you find a woman you really like and truly want to date her (and maybe eventually marry her), the best way to do that is to give her lots of attention. Not talking stalker amounts of attention here, but an ample amount; far too many modern Americans are guilty of neglecting others in their pursuit of personal goals, and many people in the modern USA are increasingly isolated and lonely. But yeah, the troll above is right about one thing — most women love personal attention more than just about anything.
What men want:
http://www.misandryreview.com/?p=15517
White Preservationist:
Fuck you. I am no troll. I visit here often and have made constructive comments on occasion. I do find it sort of amusing that there are so many limp dicked white guys here who can’t get and or handle their women. If you can’t even deal with what is in your own beds…….just how in the hell will you ever deal with a revolution? I gave you constructve, if somewhat tongue in cheek advice. I don’t have trouble with women. Always got plenty and have had the same wife for 20 years. I’ve got bigger fish to fry than what skirt I’m gonna chase next weekend……….but if I did NEED to get some………I’d go for the fat chicks…………ASSHOLE!
Or…….even better………..Fat chicks at CHURCH!
Wally,
No conservative would disagree with any of that. So why alienate them by threatening to “destroy” them?
Oldie,
Don’t believe? Fake it until you make it.
Pick a church that’s not too fundamentalist so you can tolerate living by its rules long term.
You don’t have to follow their rules. They have no way to know whether you do or don’t. And if you don’t, so what, it’s not a theocracy. A better reason to stay away from fundies is that you can have something else to talk about besides God if you make friends there. And the less fundie they are, the easier they are to subvert. Most people just want to believe there is ‘something’ rather than ‘nothing’ and settle on/stick with Christianity for its cultural and racial familiarity. As far as I’m concerned, you can rip up or throw away the Bible and still be Christian — after all, the early Christians never had bibles and they did pretty well. The point is to retain the ‘spiritual value’ Christians get out of their faith but weaken the preachers’ authority, which they use to guilt Christians into things like antiracism.
Isseldijk,
“Also stop dissing the girls – our food/rent/car costs are equal to yours, plus we have the overhead of primping & polishing as the magazines show the males/females what is currently expected. Now-a-days us girls have to man-up because you men can’t be relied upon and always need your ego supported. BTW, it was you alpha/beta males sleeping at the switch (or with the girl), that let our politcs/finance/country become compromised!”
— Reliably harpy-esque. This kind of sauce is unbecoming of any lady worthy of the name.
That’s harpy-esque? Please. You can’t tell anything by that other than that she is “independent.” You don’t know that she doesn’t dress and behave conservatively or that she isn’t into sleeping around or that she doesn’t want a husband and kids. Most women you meet these days will have had a number of partners. That’s reality. But don’t assume that none of them ever realized it hasn’t exactly made them happy until you came along to point out — because that is what you want to say isn’t it, that ladies, it’s been a grave mistake, right? You do want to reform them rather than to “punish” them, right?
Women just want someone that can make them feel good about themselves. The easiest way for them to enjoy those feelings is to earn the respect and admiration of a man they themselves respect and admire. Then all those little nagging problems diminish in importance because they can tell themselves, well, at least I’ve got [man’s name]. If the man is a sissy little faggot ‘male feminist’ who thinks he has to apologize for his existence she won’t be able to respect and admire him and his ability to make her feel good about herself is consequently diminished, and the ‘nag-value’ of all life’s little problems gets magnified.
The first thing men have to do is again make it unacceptable to be a slut. Some women never forgot that it’s unacceptable and they went about their business surreptitiously. That can be tolerated. But this phenomenon of women celebrating and reveling in their sluthood needs to be disposed of. And it’s pretty easy to do. You just call them out on it and you don’t back down or apologize when they begin to wail about the ‘double standard’; you tell them to go fuck themselves. No man can respect a worthless slut. If a woman wants your respect she’ll damn well have to earn it. Simple as that. There won’t be any overnight changes but if change is to occur it starts from here.
Wally,
Sure, most of them give lip service to supernaturalism, but in practice they are libertine harlots.
But it’s easier to reform them if they already believe in or accept the possibility that promiscuity is wrong or questionable, in this case from a spiritual/moral standpoint. It’s much harder when they insist it’s perfectly fine, in which case I can only imagine social shaming doing the trick.
silver,
I only said we needed to create a viable alternative to conservatism.
I admit there have been times when I have wished that some of these girls would take up serious, old fashioned Calvinism.
Is it possible, you guys are digging your own holes?. Why is your priority ‘attractiveness’? instead of character or loyalty, or honour, or faitfullness, or sincerity???
Why do you follow the brainwashing dictum, for whom you should find attractive? If you know they are brainwashing you with concepts of ‘whiteness’; how come you don’t know that they are brainwashing you with concepts of ‘beauty’?
If you look for attractiveness. Then you must not be surprised that when you find it, that woman, spends all the time, working on cultivating her attractiveness. If you spent your time looking for honour or character; you would find someone who spends htier time and focus on cultivating htier character, or becoming a better, person; then you could partner with someone who shares those qualities with you, and your relationship just grows stronger.
Until you change your values, and priorities, you should not be surprised when you actually find what you are looking for.
I gave up on zirchonia’s a long long time ago. And I found myself my rough cut blue diamond, whom to me is the most beautiful, gorgeous man alive. Because of his character, and his values. He is truly a blue diamond thoroughbred. A treasure.
You too can find yourselves a rough cut diamond, but not while you are being brainwashed with zirconia dogma’s about beauty.
Think about it.
I always look for a mix of characteristics. I would take a girl who is somewhat attractive + intelligent + respectable + interesting over a much hotter, but sluttier type anyday.
Southern women are bad in terms of attraction to cads. It’s because the South is a more traditional culture and sex roles are more like in primitive societies. Southern men are more unfaithful, cad like and smooth than northern men are, on average. Southerners generally have a charming social exterior which masks selfishness and duplicity. I was in the South for my vacation this summer and found, as I always do when I go there, that your women are much easier to deal with than women in large northern cities like NY, Boston, DC Chicago etc. They have less attitude and lower(ie less unreasonable) expectations. If you are depressed by the dating scene in AL, you would probably kill yourself if you came to NYC.
And whoever suggested finding a wife at an AA meeting — that’s one of the worst ideas I have ever heard.
@Mark:’And yet, you’re still friends with this guy, and you condone “game” yet resent the outcomes. Sounds contradictory to me.
Don’t forget, part of the reason women are slutty is because of men like your friend… social predators, sociopaths.’
I agree that Hunter Wallace has an apparent contradiction to resolve; he doesn’t like “Game,” and yet he appears to practice it. Since he doesn’t appear to be fixated on marrying a virgin (which used to be standard procedure) he should be able to resolve it with a bit of introspection and thought. Perhaps he approves of some promiscuity, but he doesn’t like the deception inherent in “Game.”
On the other hand, calling his friend a “predator” seems exaggerated to me.
I agree that male inability to control sexual impulses is part of the reason that modern women are promiscuous.
Sadly, men who are good at controlling themselves often do not breed! And so the horniest genes produce the next generation. I weep for the dysgenic effects of the Kali Yuga!
For those who like to read, and are interested in examining this issue on a deeper level than perhaps a Roissy can provide, I,
(a longtime reader of this and similar blogs) recommend the following.
Some of you may have already read Devlin and Amneus. They are relevant to this thread. To those who have not read these authors and are interested, here are some links:
Much of Devlin’s work is linked here:
http://dontmarry.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/articles-by-f-roger-devlin/
or google “F. Roger Devlin”
——-
As for Daniel Amneus,
his “Garbage Generation” can be found here:
http://www.fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html
and his “The Case For Father Custody” is here in PDF format:
http://www.fathermag.com/news/Case_for_Father_Custody.pdf
Acknowledged: Amneus can be very repetitive in his argumentation; nonetheless, if you wade through it, you may find interesting points throughout. Also acknowledged: Amneus seems to argue (much more so in ‘Garbage Generation’ than in ‘Father Custody’) in favor of nurture over nature, that is to say, he argues that the disproportionately high black crime rate is due to fatherless homes, without considering the formidable role played by nature, i.e., genes. Try to look past this blindspot of his, his work still has considerable value. After all, a man can have something important to say without getting everything correct in his argument.
or google “Daniel Amneus”
The works of Devlin and Amneus can be found on the net in torrent search engines as well.
——–
As an afterthought, for the truly voracious readers among you, one might consider obtaining a copy of “Sex and Culture” (1934)
by J.D. Unwin, available on the net/torrent in PDF format. He argues that great civilizations of the past that accorded ‘equal’ or considerable power to its women disappeared soon thereafter from history/the world stage.
FB has succinctly given the reasons for having nothing to do with “chicks” — fat, Christian, libertine, White Nationalist, teenaged or any other kind, for there is but one kind at bottom; exceptions shouldn’t be magnified.
We’re all getting older. Interest in “the game”, low to begin with, fades to nothing. We’re all probably going to end up “evolutionary dead-ends”. Such is the cost of heresy.
If the “horniest genes” will produce the next generation, the concupiscence of the lowly has always predominated in the world. Cf. the Irish and the Hindus.
If you want to find a anti-egalitarian partner, look for a woman working in human resources, the education field, or in any capacity which demands total adherence to the cannon of political correctness. You’ll be surprised to what extent such women agree with the views expressed on this site.
Also, make male friends. Lots of them. Network. Be honest and honorable with your friends and those acts will be relayed to their significant others. Women gossip. Your good name will spread to other women in the circle. Sooner or later a matchmaker will crop up to pair you off. This may be through an introduction (if you like what you see, be sure to express your interest immediately) or a blind date. Friendship does the work for you.
One more thing, it takes time and energy to make friends. You can only make so many. Choose wisely. While admiration should play a part, you should also note what class of person you are befriending. It will in large part determine the pool of women you’ll be introduced to. Also, networking is used for far more than finding a partner or spouse. If you hitch yourself to an ambitious circle, you could be swept to fortune or fame. See George Washington’s Rules of Civility, No. 56:
“Associate yourself with Men of good Quality if you Esteem your own Reputation; for ’tis better to be alone than in bad Company.”
http://www.history.org/Almanack/life/manners/rules2.cfm
Straw man.
Maybe you missed the part where he said his friend preys on naive girls and has no concern for their feelings. That has nothing to do with procreation.
No. You said this:
Don’t forget, part of the reason women are slutty is because of men like your friend… social predators, sociopaths.
So male promiscuity is “sociopathy” but women get a pass for it because it started with men. That sounds like accepting the female frame to me.
Plus, there are just as many women as men who engage in predatory tactics these days. The whole blame game about what began with who is very tired.
“We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.”
If white men give up on women there won’t be any future white children.
Look fellas, this ship has sailed.
Where are you going to find “country” women? At next month’s barn raising?
The left has succeeded in villifying and criminalizing the nuclear family, white culture and the right to freedom of assembly.
Until there is open civil revolt, no one will be free to fulfill their birthright.
Intruder: “I do find it sort of amusing that there are so many limp dicked white guys here who can’t get and or handle their women.”
I agree. It’s pretty amusing. As I’ve said, it’s not really that difficult to get laid, especially with white women. If these guys, such as HW and FB, who are smarter than 95% of the population already, can’t manage to pick up a white girl or two (or have opted out of doing so), then what chance do they have of winning over a larger portion of the population? Well, right there is the problem: they are too cerebral, too introverted–and they are over-thinking the situation.
Motherfuck off. All you sonsabitches say the problem lies with us. Oh indeed. Nary a critique for the fairer sex. Fuck you, very much.
Picking up a White girl, or getting laid, isn’t the problem. It is finding one worth keeping.
Hey, HW, I clearly formated that fucking comment w./ HTMl, so WTF? It was a blockquote, please correct it or delete it. Otherwise it fuxx my comment.
Uh-[i]huh[/i]. All you sonsabitches say the problem lies with us. Oh indeed. Nary a critique for the fairer sex. Fuck you, very much.
Mark, I’m not blaming you. I want you guys to succeed. I want you guys to find a mate and have kids, so that MY children can grow up and have a larger white dating pool from which to find a mate. No, I do think the problem lies with white women, who have been manipulated beyond belief by the Yids. And they seem to revel in it. They seem really to enjoy whoring it up and rubbing our noses in their interracial flings. Truly, American women are the scum of the earth. (Not all of them, but most IMO). But I’m getting ahead of myself here… 😉
“Southern women are bad in terms of attraction to cads. It’s because the South is a more traditional culture and sex roles are more like in primitive societies. Southern men are more unfaithful, cad like and smooth than northern men are, on average. Southerners generally have a charming social exterior which masks selfishness and duplicity.”
You have any statistical data to support those ridiculous assertions?
My cell phone has been buzzing all evening. The girl my best friend was screwing last week is tired of his shit. She wants to hang out with me now. I’m not really keen on seconds.
In terms of qualities, she is a 5/9: attractive, good in bed, has a good attitude, lives close by, and likes to have a good time. Not smart, interesting, or respectable; doesn’t have money/career.
Find a plain, submissive girl who you can support and treat with respect, and fertilize her with some aristocratic Nordic eggs. You’ll be doing your bloodline a favour.
You have any statistical data to support those ridiculous assertions?
Motherfuck off.
“…fertilize her with some aristocratic Nordic eggs…”
What?! Is this some obscure Nordic mating ritual of which I’m totally unaware?
It would, I suppose, explain the totally pussified response of Nordic men to the invasion of their homelands, and rapes of their women, by muds.
“I’m not really keen on seconds.”
“Find a plain, submissive girl who you can support and treat with respect, and fertilize her with some aristocratic Nordic eggs.”
“Motherfuck off.”
Sounds like a plan.
Interesting.
These problems with women are reducible to two causes. First, Television. The Idiot Box. The Jew Tube. People allow their adolescent daughters to watch TV for hours a day, and then are surprised they turn into mindless, materialistic whores.
Second, “conservative economics.” One White man with a high school diploma and a union job could afford a house, a car, and a wife at home to raise the kids. Now? Husband and wife both work, kids sent to public schools and day care. It’s too bad your capitalism worship led to sending all the jobs to Mexico and now China.
When the wife works she’s at least a co-boss, and men’s power and authority is weakened.
So, the solution – turn off the damned TV, and work to institute tariffs on foreign goods and strong labor unions. Or continue the conservative/libertarian pursuit of the “free market” and prepare for your Chinese boss and son-in-law.
No, the solution is to kill those responsible, preferably in very large numbers (though such a course of action has its disadvantages), and reoccupy the seats of government. But I’m probably pissing in the wind here, to guys who can’t even seem to get a fucking date.
I’ ve read the comments and am not surprised at the double standard . You guys are more vicious then any girl I know.
To #29 uh: I never directly laid the blame upon you – it was a general statement.
To #30 Ijsseldijk: Sauce always compliments the meat & potato, (& hopefully shortens your life.)
To #33 Friedrich : An Ass with charm is funny & lovable, though you lack the charm!!!
To #27 Proz: The Girls have that same list – how funny is that.
Not to worry, I won’t submit an opinion anymore, and yes I know you don’t give %#*#!
To #29 uh: I never directly laid the blame upon you – it was a general statement.
A general statement expressed as direct blame. Don’t worry, it’s the standby of WN females. We’re used to it. Some even believe it.
Well, right there is the problem: they are too cerebral, too introverted–and they are over-thinking the situation.
Some situations irresistibly call for over-thinking. Some of us are addicted to just that process of making sense of a complex state of affairs, which makes us unfit for it socially. Obviously we’re “too cerebral” — but as this can’t be corrected, our only choice is to push ahead being cerebral. FB I don’t see watching “the game” with drinking buddies and agonizing over the fate tarts. HW keeps that company, it’s the present manifestation of the society into which he was born and which he cherishes.
There have always been a few over-thinkers and a mass of under-thinkers. (No offense: for an under-thinker you’ve come a long way — and you have the Italian wife.) Now, the over-thinkers can try to fit themselves into the stream of under-thinking society, which usually fails, or they can accept their unfitness and order their lives accordingly, if they can. As society, in the consolidation of the modern world-system, plugs up holes traditionally available to those seeking refuge from it, it becomes harder for over-thinkers to escape the scenes of its discomfort. One is forced to associate everywhere. Living by one’s unfitness becomes much harder as one is forced into contact with vulgar (“folkish”!) stimuli. It is the assumption of the mantle of solitude, not that of the crowd, that is prescribed for the over-thinker. I don’t know, there’s something desperate in HW’s socializing — I don’t mean that to insult. Trying to get something out of it that isn’t there. But, I don’t really know the guy.
*fate of
No, I think they need to liberate themselves, from the over-thinking, which is desperate struggle. It’s all very simple, as you and I both, as under-thinkers, together, instinctively understand.
Did I say “under-thinkers, together”? I should have referred to you as a none-thinker. Because, in the end, that’s all you offer: nothing. Nada. Zilch. There’s nothing there. But don’t fret. Your overseas tales entertain.
Great comments White Non-Conservative (#92)!
Talmudvision (TV) is indeed poisonous, and most women seem to be much more deeply poisoned by it than men. A lot of modern women are outright addicted to it, and it inculcates within in them gutter/Judaic values like materialism, consumerism, whoredom, superficiality, negro-worship, mindlessness, etc which soils White-Western culture. Of course though, a lot of modern men are increasingly addicted to the internet in order to kill extra time, but that is at least preferable to the TV because the internet is a whole lot more interactive in that the person controls the content whilst the TV is a whole lot more passive because the content is controlled by others (usually mass-media Jewry). The strong affinity many modern women have for TV makes sense of course because women are fundamentally more passive while men are more active and thus they often prefer the internet. One of the first things we should do in the event of a pro-White revolution is cut-off Judaized cable TV pronto and replace it with healthier, more constructive programming and a lot fewer commercials.
I also agree with almost everything you said about economics too. Ever since I became a pro-White racialist I have become increasingly conservative in my views, especially socially, but I am still ‘non-conservative’ in many respects too, mostly in relation to economic issues, i.e. “money is a Jewish social construct.”