January 15, 2010
This guy doesn’t get me at all. I’m not against white people… I’m just against white people who are against other people….Kunstler and Whites
December 28, 2009 by Hunter Wallace
But, Mr. Kunstler does not want to get into a debate about what constitutes “white people who are against other people.” Is it white people who want to be able to exercise the right to free association, which was outlawed by the Civil Rights movement? Is it a white family that teaches their children to marry a spouse of their own race? Are immigration restrictionists part of Kunstler’s “white people who are against other people?” Is it whites who want to have the same right to ethnic advocacy that every other group, including Jews, have?
It is precisely avoiding this debate and keeping that definition of “bad” whites unclear that makes this throwaway line about “white people who are against other people” fundamentally dishonest. Mr. Kunstler simply does not want to go there.
That’s fine. He has every right to avoid the race issue and talk about the fiasco of suburbia. But he should not simply dismiss those of us who are having this discussion in a pro-white, ethnic interests context as “white people who are against other people.” He should acknowledge that he doesn’t go there, and leave it at that.
In his mind, and the minds of the rest of those defending the System, he doesn’t have to debate you because his side is in power. No matter how sophisticated and irrefutable our political theories, philosophies and sciences are, they don’t have to debate it because we have no power at the moment.
Yes. People like this want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to speak volumes by using packed phrases that reference entire histories with a line, and they don’t want anyone unpacking things and cataloging them.
We’re going to have to teach the lot of them some manners, I’m afraid.
People like this want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to speak volumes by using packed phrases that reference entire histories with a line, and they don’t want anyone unpacking things and cataloging them.
Exactly. The “don’t go there” pre-emptive defense.
There are two discussions about this at my other blog:
http://antisemitica.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/kunstler-on-antisemitica/
http://antisemitica.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/kunstler-and-whites/
In the last two weeks, Antisemitica has got the attention of both David Frum and James Howard Kunstler.
You can’t have an honest discussion about suburbia without exploring the racial angle.
Hunter,
You are exactly right. Suburbanization is definitely racial politics. I hadn’t thought of that.
It’s a way of forcing Whites out of the cities.
What we need to do is have an urban/rural cooperation, so we have a street in a city where no house ever goes for sale, and the urban dwellers do a trade in the product of rural dwellers, and if a city person wants to go farm, he can go live on and work on a farm (usually just for the summer), and if a farm kid wants to go to college in Boston, he or she can go live on the “White street” in the city.
We need to control our own civil planning, rather than being “herded” by banksters and their kosher “civil planner” helpers.
I’m also against white people who are against other people. I think that all races should have their own lands. The problems we have today are because some a****les thought it would be a good idea to bring in blacks to do “jobs Americans won’t do”, and others who thought it was the White Man’s Burden to stick our nose in other races business. If they want to live in ancient ways, let them.
Those people are the real race traitors.