Herpes blisters and malodorous discharges are sweeping like a pandemic through the IT departments of America. Spineless cretins who once did without or ordered themselves a broad from abroad out of a catalog are now shuffling out of their cubicles, trading in their WalMart khakis for tight designer jeans, and heading out to the clubs to get laid. Somehow, as if by some kind of satellite brainwashing beacon, the White race’s natural losers have become masters at the art of coaxing pathetic sluts into doing what pathetic sluts do.
While most major social movements and disease epidemics are the product of emergent conditions without a singular causation, this particular stain on America’s honor was actually orchestrated by a single evil mastermind: Roissy. A blogger. This absurd parody of a dishonorable womanizing asshole has accomplished the sociological equivalent of a physicist accidentally opening up a black hole in his lab: he has fused the blossoming field of studying human biodiversity (HBD) with the sleazy subculture of “game”.
To summarize, women are instinctively attracted to dominant men in the same way that men are instinctively attracted to fertile women. Roissy assists men in feigning dominance in a manner analogous to how women feign fertility with cosmetics. He instructs men on how to communicate in an arrogant and dismissive manner. He explains why it’s important to insult women. He also explains how to stand (like Captain Morgan), how to dress, and how to dispose of the human being once you’ve soiled it.
An essential aspect of his worldview is that there are “alpha males” and “beta males”. By his understanding, the alpha males are confident, dominant, and promiscuous while beta males are insecure, submissive, and faithful. He also mentions Omega Males, complete losers. There’s one type of male that Roissy appears to overlook entirely, the type of male who completely changes the “game”: the patriarch.
Roissy’s “alpha male” is content to merely exploit feckless, faithless, and fatherless young women. He’s deliberately barren, unabashedly degenerate, infesting the ruins of traditional society. The patriarch, by contrast, embodies restoration, faithfulness, and fertility while being more dominant than the contemporary alpha parasite could ever pretend to be. Women, even scores of women, submit to him with absolute devotion, in far more ways than mere fornication.
When the restoration comes, the patriarchs will put a stop to the “game” subculture by offering women an alternative which is both instinctively and practically preferable. Our women, our single most important possessions, will be returned to their natural and respected role. The alpha male game geeks will find less and less desirable prey and their lifestyle will be perceived as being every bit as foul as the scabs they pick.
Hey Michael,
Keep this fact in mind: writing should not be masturbatory. You have a target audience. It’s a good idea not to begin your essays by characterizing your audience as “misogynistic” and “lonely.” You could have easily have said that “modern White males, especially those with healthy racial attitudes, have been emasculated by today’s society and as a result are failing to develop productive relationships with the opposite sex.” It probably doesn’t help to suggest that men use women’s “whoreishness, erratic behavior, uncertainty, irrationality, insecurity” as an exploitable weakness to control them. Some women might be offended.
Well that is your problem – you just skimmed the article and came to an inaccurate conclusion as a result.
No I did not.
degenerate when it isn’t
So you think casual sex and “spitting game” are not degenerate?
If you and MGLS need to use misquotes to stress your points, you already reveal enough about yourselves.
I did no such thing. I said you quoted negro slang from Urban Dictionary. True. I said you encourage casual sex. You clearly did when you said sex comes before even companionship and ended your article by saying “get laid.” I said you encouraged white nationalists to ingore quality white women and try to hook up with damaged skanks. That is the clear implication from your two paragraphs on your ugly overweight friend. I said you told white nationalists to “spit some game.” You did. I mentioned words not contained in your article.
Also, I may not directly mention “children” or “baby” there, MGLS, but I’m sure that someone afflicted with Downs Syndrome could determine that I’m stressing the importance of children when I talk about turning women into mothers of our future.
Sure, it’s abundantly clear that you’re stressing the importance of marriage, children, and families when you are encouraging white men to “spit some game,” “get laid,” pick up some sluts, and act like negroes.
That’s a slap in the face to the beauty of the White female, among many other offenses.
Yeah, but it’s an appreciation of the beauty of white women to act like negroes, “spit some game,” and hook up with damaged sluts.
Aside from ‘game,’ there is a much better and more sane reaction to feminism on some of these so called ‘men’s rights’ websites; sites such as The Spearhead and a few others are good…The Spearhead even referenced TOQO in an article earlier today: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/01/24/white-game/
If it takes using game to bring White women into our midst, culture them, make them one of us, and secure our future, I am for it. It’s simply a matter of using the tools of a decaying society against it. If you cannot embrace that, then don’t. I’m not promoting White nationalist hip-hop here, I’m promoting the formation of White couples and the spawning of White youths. The old ways of securing these things aren’t quite as successful as they used to be, hence, we must improvise.
Game like most heresies and falsehoods is partly true. It’s true that it’s more attractive to act like a real man, have self-confidence, and be willing to stand up for yourself and not just be a reflection of a woman’s ever-changing whims. At the same time, people in general, and women, also like a man that has some honor, decency, moral strength, willingness and ability to settle down even though he has options, the ability to earn a living, etc. People out there have normal, healthy relationships, including my parents and my brother and me, and they’re not wimps, they’re not suckers, and they’re not Alan Alda.
Men’s Rights is:
Pro-Multiculturalism; yet denounces Cultural Marxism as the source of their problems, of which multiculturalism is a branch.
Pro-Miscegenation
Argues endlessly that sex/gender is not a social construct; yet refuses to acknowledge the same regarding race. Talking about race will often get you banned.
Rarely, if ever, names the big J.
Roosh is even more of a clown than Roissy the Jew.
Bell’s piece is simply his advice of how to get ahead in Gomorrah, whether he sees it clearly or not. It is an implicit indication of how deep the rot has gone, and how powerful our enemies are. I realize this is not what many here wish to hear – and upon hearing it some get sick to their stomachs and start muttering about “sociopaths” – but there will be no righting of the ship without a thoroughgoing cleansing gone about with puritanical fanaticism. Not one bit of the devil’s handiwork left in place. Otherwise the race will wither on the vine.
Recently a female blogger who had some kind of a grudge against Roissy completely outed him – his name, address, place of employment, and other things; it turns out that he is a 40-something year old government employee living in DC who might also be a Jew either wholly or partially, or if he isn’t a Jew is is without a doubt wholly Judaized – http://ladyraine.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/exposed-roissy-in-dc/
_____
WP,
The ‘female blogger’ in question , Wendy Schwartz aka ‘Lady’ Raine’ is an extremely unhinged single mother who also just happens to be a ‘former’ stripper.
She is an unbelievable testosterone-addled, misandric nut-case. She lives a completely deluded fantasy life online, constantly attacking men and all aspects of traditional culture.
She even paired up with this part-Jewish yenta Feminist named “Denise Romano, MA, EdM” (a pompus ass like no other) who believes that men who use ‘Game’ are guilty of assault and should be charged (if you can believe this) with rape.
—
http://ladyraine.wordpress.com/2010/01/17/consent-whats-the-confusion/
http://ladyraine.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/why-game-is-abusive-denise-romano/
—
Yet, and this is a BIG YET, she also claims to have profound respect for White and her reputed German (and Protestant) heritage… even during the Third Reich, and really, really seems not to like Jews much at all.
A COMPLETE PARADOX — if their ever was one.
(BTW, “Roissy” is not a Jew — he is a German/Dutch/Italian Catholic who has went on record with criticizing the heavy Jewish and Lesbian influences on Feminism — he even took wildly pro-semitic commentator ‘Whiskey/Testing99/EvilNeocon” to task once for claiming that 1960’s Radicalism was a product of ‘Quaker’ and ‘Puritan’ influences.) This being said, I still disagree, strongly, with most of what Jim Wiedmann – “Roissy” – has to say.
Related links –
http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/01/05/an-open-letter-to-denise-romano-ma-edm/
http://www.inmalafide.com/2010/01/14/extremely-incisive-and-incredibly-foolish-the-strange-case-of-roissy-in-dc/
http://www.inmalafide.com/2010/01/21/game-and-gender-hierarchy/
Imperil, I agree with you. “Game” came naturally to me in my younger years, and I used it to its fullest for a while. However, unlike Roissy, I didn’t do it out of maliciousness or hatred of women, as it’s clear he does. I really enjoyed having women fawn over me and I liked making them happy. However juggling women and trying to please more than one is really too much of a chore and the reaction it caused once they found out was too much emotional baggage.
I expect a little game playing with teenagers, maybe even into the early twenties, but we have to grow up sometime. Unfortunately a lot of people stop emotionally developing in junior high. This is especially prevalent among blacks.
I like this side of you, Wiki, puff your chest out a little, sound your war cry! Son of a bitch must pay!
Roissy is the kind of swaggering prick you want to get into a bar fight with and make him taste his own blood.
His version of game is that of a social predator, a sociopath who preys on women with no remorse. It disgusts me, and his defense and praise of blacks and other mongrels like Tigger Woods.
Roissy:
Tiger Woods may not be a model citizen, but neither does he have an emotional or psychological problem. He’s just a man with a strong sex drive who got bored with the same old pussy day in and day out and decided to spice it up with a willing brigade of slutty concubines all too ready to dismiss their own feelings of complicity in the sordid arrangements that will now cost Woods hundreds of millions of dollars. If Woods has a problem, it’s that he got married. Big mistake, chief.
WP:
Chicks in their 20’s will still go for a good looking guy who good social skills and great game who is 40-45. Especially ethnic women, Asians, Hispanics, East Indians, Iranians, Caribbeans.
White women usually won’t go for them, but they will tolerate their looks and flirtations. A few will take the plunge. After 47 or so, things get a whole lot touchier. You can maybe still get an Hispanic women in her 20’s, but it will be very difficult. Most White women won’t even tolerate you looking at them. That’s called “creeping them out.”
Roach,
How so? He’s unmarried, in his 40s, and has casual sex by charming women he has no intention of going any further with. Maybe it’s okay when the rich and smart do it.
Mark said: I expect a little game playing with teenagers, maybe even into the early twenties, but we have to grow up sometime.
That’s all that really needs to be said about it.
But there’s also this: Young women today have a lot of sex. That’s just a fact of reality. Not all of them do it because “they’re whores” or because they enjoy the lifestyle (I highly doubt they — being female — enjoy the inevitable heartbreaks and emotional roller coaster rides). They do it because “everyone else does.” Since that’s the case it’s just common sense that you need to learn how to “play the game” else you cede the field to those who do. And mind you, picking up a girl doesn’t require one to “pump and dump” her; maybe something substantially more meaningful will ensue — but you’ll never know unless you first try.
WP,
That’s the dream life for these guys. It’s easy to draw a straight line from atheistic, aracialist libertarianism to socially (“civilizationally”) irresponsible lifelong hedonism .
Captainchaos,
Fanaticism has gotten us nowhere.
Imperil: You would be correct that most pro-Men groups accept the current anti-White policy. However, most of them aren’t necessary advocating it either. Most are probably neutral about it.
And the principles of pro-Men and pro-White do not necessarily have to conflict. I think we could benefit greatly from forming a political coalition with pro-Men groups.
Divorce is destroying many families, and even a significant number of women are getting sick of it.
Pro-men groups are inherently and irredeemably anti-White. They’re not an attempt at restoration or an attempt at a sustainable model of future success. They’re a craven attempt to climb on the multicult bandwagon as victims. All of the valid grievances that men have as an identity group are the result of the revolution and the only redress is the restoration.
Men who whine about having to support their children or having disobedient wives should be mocked, not organized.
But they do have a point in limiting divorces with minors involved, no?
Funny, over at The Spearhead some self hating whites are upset that a writer linked to this article in TOQ because TOQ is RACIST!!!.
Men who whine about having to support their children or having disobedient wives should be mocked, not organized
Somebody’s been reading Alex Linder, LOL.
If men’s groups advocate “limiting divorce with minors involved” then they have a good point. I was a child of a generation that took marriage and divorce lightly, with little or no regard for the kids, and it was a disaster. It was a repeat of the “wild children” problem that the USSR had in the 1920’s, when the Commies literally destroyed the family.
You know why finding girlfriends is such a problem for guys in the modern age? Because we are so mobile and atomized. If you are part of a large group of friends or social network, that social network advertises your evolutionary fitness for you. It helps make you an alpha male. A tight knit group of friends is the envy of atomized Amerikwans, male and female.
For example on coalitions: Most agree that Green Peace is a little radical. But, we and Green Peace would not want all of the American forests destroyed.
Likewise-although we may disagree with some pro-Men groups on some issues, promoting Fathers’ rights could benefit us commenters here (at OD) and even White interests.
Skeptics, think about beautiful White children (male and female) losing their White father, just to be raised by say, a Hispanic male.
Kievsky,
If men’s groups advocate limiting divorce with children involved, then they’re hardly men’s groups. Marriage is a colossal imposition on men. It’s a necessary one, mind you. But colossal. To the extent that they advocate for that, then I support them.
Maybe I’m coming at this from the wrong info, because I’m thinking of men who want palimony, complain about child support, and attempt to undermine the one thing that tradition and modernity agree on: that children should generally remain with the mother.
But, as long as the father is not abusive or a threat to the children, he should not be forced to neglect them. We are emphasizing great and wonderful fathers separated from their children, just because of a woman’s whim, er, I mean intuition!
Also: Child support doesn’t necessarily fund the needs of children. It goes directly to the mother, who can use it as an allowance-as she wishes.
Steve,
The father who yearns to directly support his children must take on the entirety of the modern approach to gender relations. The whole thing is transactional, not fair. As things stand, men have voluntarily relinquished the traditional responsibilities, which means that they’ve also relinquished the authority to dictate the fate of their children. A single man may rail against this single example of unfairness in his context, but only a reassertion of male authority and gender specialization can change the situation.
As things currently stand, child support is a zero-sum battle, with the field biased in favor of the mother and the stepfather. I’m coming at this from a stepfather’s perspective. I don’t have a lot of sympathy for the guy who fails to raise his children yet kvetches about the possibility that the guy raising them in his stead might receive a single dollar of compensation for the favor. In fact, hearing it makes me want to get liposuction with it…out of spite.
My own parents divorced when I was six. My father lived nearby, remained an active dad in my life, and paid his child support dutifully. There truly are male victims, but my suspicion is that the overwhelming majority are men who either caused the divorce, didn’t work hard enough for the marriage, didn’t want full custody as bad as they let on, and didn’t make the simple sacrifices necessary to remain in the child’s life (such as relocating).
Please understand that I’m not here to point fingers or make specific determinations on anybody’s personal situations. I’ve been around long enough to see and hear it all. But please don’t point fingers at divorced women or single mothers in general, either.
Wikitopian: I sympathize with your life situation, and I am sure you make a great stepfather; but I also reserve the right to make fair judgements about contemporary women who separate minor children from their fathers, when their is no reason and/or real need to do so. (I am obviously not blaming every divorced woman; there are incidences where I actually do support divorce with minor children.)
I find it sad how current American State Law now discourages investing in long-term faithful relationships. A man risks even prison, the moment he gets married. A man’s love for his children is now used against him. 🙁
Wow, great. Another group that hates women as much as the Roissyites and PUA’s do.
Women are and never were meant to “do” anything FOR you. We are not “meant” to have your babies and cook your dinners. We are not “meant” to have sex to reproduce or only to repopulate the world. If we WERE meant to do that, we’d have been born with lesser brain functions and different brains than the Male.
We are not. We have the same brain functions, the same wants, needs, and desires, and we are NOT here to “marry and have babies”. Nor are we here to “slut it up and be empowered”.
We don’t belong to any of you whether white, black, PUA, or MRA.
We are not your possessions and you are not “entitled” to a good woman just because you were born a man or have a penis.
Men are expected to EARN a woman’s affections (that’s why PUA is so disgusting….it’s a lighter form of throwing a Roofie in her drink). Even in the Animal Kingdom where the “dominant” gender varies from animal to animal…..the females are STILL in charge of the family, the sexual decisions, and the bringing/taking of life.
That will never change. Men are expected to “woo” a woman properly with traditional dates and courtship. Not “get her drunk at a bar and then try to get her to consent to sex with you as quickly as possible”.
Women should NOT be giving up sex until the man has earned it, earned her respect, and proven he is a hard-working, honorable, honest man worth her attentions. He cannot prove this if he acts like a PUA and just ditches out before the woman has a chance to reject him in the first place.
It seems that you at least respect traditional values and respect, but you also seem to have it out for women. I have YET to see a comment here that speaks of what is “good for the WOMEN”. All I see here is what YOU all think is good for women. What you all WANT to be good for women. What you “want” doesn’t matter.
I love to work and make my own money. I like having my son and having no one involved with how I raise him. I like having the option to buy a new house or keep the one I have based on MY hard work and MY income thus far. I like knowing that I will never need to live with/off a man because there are SO MANY bad men in this world and now we have Rapists like the PUA’s to worry about avoiding too!!
I’m sure you’d all love to see women back in the homes and pushing out babies, but that was never our “original position” or where we were “meant to be”. In nature it does NOT make sense that there would be one gender who had the ability to overtake/control/destroy the OTHER gender. It does not make any Evolutionary or Scientific sense and therefore any talk of “men being superior or dominant over women” or of “women being superior and dominant over men” is absolutely ridiculous.
Women are good at raising children….they are also good at writing complicated Machinist’s Programs like I am. They are also good at fixing cars or maybe baking a cake…..fighting it out in the courtroom or performing brain surgery as a doctor……or maybe she likes to Garden.
Whatever the case, there never WAS a “natural” place for women. It’s just that men have always been “jealous” and nervous of the power all female creatures possess over sex, life, death, rebirth, and reproduction. A power that males never had. Many men (like PUA’s and old school Chauvinists) are afraid of that power and try to own/control/stop/steal that power.
They don’t realize that women have no choice in the matter of having that “power” and that trying to “win” or “control” the female gender is like shaking your fist at the sky every day for it being blue.
Women don’t WANT to be “stuck in a role” any more than YOU as men want to be told what to do, where to go, what to wear, what kind of job to have, or anything else. Things will never go back that way and even though you seem to have a more traditional set of values, there is no reason why any intelligent and educated woman would INTENTIONALLY want to go back to being “cared for” by a man and having no freedom to say “No, thanks….I like my house and my car and my freedom without having a man involved.”
I saw comments here about how women shouldn’t go to college and get an education because they’ll “have fun and be slutty”?
Women have every right to “be slutty” or no be slutty like men do. There’s no Anthropological, Scientific, or Medical reason that they shouldn’t or couldn’t do the same things men do.
Suggesting women shouldn’t receive college education is horrible and shameful of you. Trying to keep them out of college and FORCING them back into the home where we DON’T want to be and never WILL BE AGAIN is the same as Slavery.
Offering no education to girls like the Arabs do? Oh, now we’re Middle Easterns who treat their women as second class slaves? Nope, sorry….we have rights, we pay taxes, we work hard and contribute to Technology, Medicine, and the Sciences and you have NO RIGHT to take away what is OURS that we EARNED with or without you.
You act like you respect your “White Females” and want the best for them, but you clearly want them to be SLAVES to your will and what YOU WANT for them once again, which makes you no better than those sleazy PUA’s who want sex-slaves. You want baby-machines and maids. Guess what? You can hire one. Go get a nanny. Go hire a prostitute. Women are DONE doing things for men at their command because our 1,000s of years of Slavery to you are done and the only reason things ever WERE that way is because men knew to fear women and their power.
The only way to “stay in control” was to make women your slave and hate them. You trying to PUSH us back into roles that we don’t WANT and will never accept is SLAVERY. You don’t like or respect your “White Women” you want to OWN them and destroy their minds, souls, and bodies with your baby factory bs and your disgusting sexual urges.
Go to a hooker if you want sex, go to an adoption agency if you want babies, and if you need a meal and a clean shirt, call and pay for a Maid and a Personal Chef.
Women are now busy making money for themselves, working hard for themselves, and enjoying the fact that we don’t HAVE to work for free as slaves anymore.
That will never change and especially NOT amongst educated White Women. We have our independence and don’t need marriage, Welfare, or marriage to have babies, homes, money, and male attention. We would rather die than give up that freedom and never will.
If you truly respected women, you’d want what they want. You’d at least want to COMPROMISE on what they want KNOWING that you treated them like dogs and slaves since the beginning of time and OWE US at least that much.
From what I’ve seen here, you’re worse than the PUA’s…..you’re better educated and have control over your sexual urges and have an even WORSE attitude about women. You think they are SUPPOSED to do things FOR you and like it. They aren’t. We are human beings with our own wants and needs and we will never want/need men to decide that for us.
Staying home is a matter of choice. Sometimes men like to, sometimes women…..but I’d never allow a man to make me a stay at home wife and mother when I’ve successfully managed to by a mother AND the sole breadwinner in the home that I own. No one would ever take that away….not even by force.
Lady Raine: I am not opposed to women going to College and/or working careers. I think woman have made great contributions in these fields.
I know at least most of the attacks were probably not aimed at me; and maybe none?
I don’t dislike women. I just don’t want divorce on demand as we have it today! I am also opposed to men divorcing (with minor children involved) without a rational cause. It goes both ways; I am just focusing on the divorcing ‘at the drop of the hat’ wives, because they initiate so many unnecessary divorces. And, even though a rare number of men get custody and child support payments, it’s the Ultra Feminist groups asking for the 50% divorce rate! I don’t see any pro-father groups calling for it.
Nevertheless, I am opposed to separating children from deserving biological/adoptive parents, Father and Mother.
If your comment #76 was not directed at me, I apologize; but, you can find some support herein.
I meant comment #74, in the last paragraph.
Lady Raine,
Welcome to our site. I believe you may have only seen half of the portrait, here. I am arguing for Tradition, for humans of both genders to be held to traditional roles. This article focuses on holding men to their natural gender roles, but you were able to discern that this also implies that women be held in their roles.
I invite you to re-examine the science, as there are consequential differences in the nature of the male and female brains. There is even a modest difference in average intelligence. More importantly, there are innate differences which are consequential in terms of arriving at optimal societal norms.
You seem to dance back and forth between what you perceive to be fair and “tough shit” depending on your own interests. The problem is that there are group interests at stake, here. Namely, the current social arrangement is demographically unsustainable and is leading to our extinction as a people. Women’s liberation will die with the rest of Western Civilization if women don’t become active partners in working toward a sustainable solution to the problem.
It seems “unfair” that you insist on men abiding by all their traditional gender roles while women are “liberated”. Should men not be liberated from child support, offering “gentlemanly” (read: special) treatment of women, and even defending the woman’s home and homeland from hostile invasion? What’s happened is that some men have followed women in abandoning tradition and embracing the abandonment of traditional roles, the pursuit of pleasure, and the indifference to individual impact on society.
As I made clear in my article, I have nothing but disdain for Roissy. I firmly believe that both men and women should be “enslaved” to traditional roles to a necessary extent. That goes for both Roissy and you. Like it or not, your political philosophy is partially responsible for Roissy’s despicable response. It’s the other side of the liberation coin: men’s liberation.
Furthermore, I don’t understand why women perceive their natural roles to be inferior to ours. A life spent surrounded by close family and friends, engaged with the neighborhood, and entrusted with the grave responsibility of mentoring tomorrow’s leaders seems like a noble and desirable one. One might even argue that it’s a better deal than a life dedicated to acquiring resources for the women and children to live off of, going out to die in battle, and operating the political bureaucracy.
I would go so far as to believe an alien race examining us through a telescope might wonder why women would be so eager to cast off their privileged position and throw their children in daycare so they can pay for that daycare. Just sayin’.
Do We Live in a Gynaecocratic Society?
http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id8.html
Lady Rhaine my only interest is what will save the White race, I have no interest in placating foolish modern women and their hatred against men. Especially those of Jewish persuasion. I’m sick of talking about what is best for women, the whole damn culture already does that. I’m interested in what is good for White families.
You are the type of woman that caused game in the first place. You witches spit all over men and expect no damn backlash? Well guess what? There is another one coming which you will have no control or say over. One that makes the gamer movement look like 1 speck of sand in a sea.
When I read women like you, I begin to sympathize with Michael Bell and Roissy. You do not help at all. I have no sympathy for women of your ilk. None. Zilch. Zero. You give no help or quarter to White men. You have no interest to do so. Therfore you are an enemy and have nothing to offer this discussion other than your inane hatred of men.
Lady Raine
Women are and never were meant to “do” anything FOR you. We are not “meant” to have your babies and cook your dinners. We are not “meant” to have sex to reproduce or only to repopulate the world. If we WERE meant to do that, we’d have been born with lesser brain functions and different brains than the Male.
When reading the insane ravings of a jewess it’s always good to recall the words of Joseph Goebbels:
The Jews have no right to claim equality with us. If they wish to speak on the streets, in lines outside shops or in public transportation, they should be ignored, not only because their are simply wrong, but because they are Jews who have no right to a voice in the community.
OR:”When reading the insane ravings of a jewess…”
Lay Raine is indeed a ranter and raver, but she isn’t a Jewess — if I remember correctly, she has stated before that she is a German-American Lutheran. She has also been accused of being ‘anti-Semitic’ more than once by the Roissyites and others; her original post exposing Roissy called him “Jimmy the Jew” or something like that.
She thoroughly opposes the degenerate ‘gamers’ and decadent PUAs, but she is still obviously rather smitten with certain feministic ideas. Eh, nobody is perfect.
Lady Raine wants women to have their cake and eat it too. She is one of these empowered woman types that supports the incubus of women’s liberation, but at the same time expects men to cling to outmoded traditional values. Roissyism is nothing more than the logical conclusion of women’s liberation.
White Preservationist
Lay Raine is indeed a ranter and raver, but she isn’t a Jewess — if I remember correctly, she has stated before that she is a German-American Lutheran.
German-American – convert. Check out the nose on her.
“Fanaticism has gotten us nowhere.”
“Lady Raine wants women to have their cake and eat it too.”
“A Jew-free, Whites only ethnostate.”
So the women will be brought back into line, the Jews and non-Whites will be removed from some bit of land at some point. If men in ski masks with automatic weapons are not required to play a role in that, however small, then I am a monkey’s uncle. And no, I am not a monkey’s uncle. Selling the lemmings a bill of goods to get them on board is one thing, just so long as you don’t believe your own bullshit.
Captainchaos,
You are not wearing a ski mask with an automatic weapon. You are not using physical violence to coerce anyone. I don’t take any of this radical posturing seriously. If given the opportunity, I’m not convinced a soul on VNN Forum would actually murder a Jewish child.
When reading the insane ravings of a jewess
OldRight,
“Lady’ Shame” is emphatically not Jewish.
What she is, however, is the closest thing to ‘White Ghetto’ that one can possibly get. An absolute unhinged psychopath (who brags about committing crime and ‘getting away’ with it) and a delusional narcissist who lives a complete online fantasy life as, in her words, ‘an elemental goddess’.
http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/01/17/home-stank-home/
An ‘ex’ stripper and single mother who hooked-up with an absolute geeky and part-Jewish female ‘activist’ who dispenses ‘dating advice’ to men with the (get this) solemn warning that ‘gaming’ yourself into a woman’s skivvies is, in her estimation, “rape”. I kid you not.
Raine herself is a complete ideological lolapolooza, btw. She, strangely enough, sticks up for Germany and even the Third Reich, even though, of course as we know, that society was not even remotely Feminist (Leni Riefenstal and Hannah Reich notwithstanding), at least by the Judeo-American definition of the word.
I think it all boils down to her being an attention-seeker who spends 24/7 of her time online, willing to say anything to get noticed. This is why I think she outed ‘Roissy’ — not because of any kind of ‘moral’ disagreement with him (since SHE IS THE FEMALE VERSION OF ‘ROISSY’) — but because she was a regular, disgusting foul-mouthed commenter on his site who was beginning to get ignored by Roissy and his regulars (I guess attention-withdrawl was hard for her).
If she comes back in any kind of sarcastic or vile mood, then she must be IP banned for good, or else she is going to pollute this site for a long, long time.
Just for some proof, here is an example of someone calling her out on her (to put it nicely) ‘inconsistencies’ –
http://www.inmalafide.com/2010/01/21/game-and-gender-hierarchy/#comment-9823
I’m coming at this from a stepfather’s perspective. I don’t have a lot of sympathy for the guy who fails to raise his children yet kvetches about the possibility that the guy raising them in his stead might receive a single dollar of compensation for the favor.
So the biological father (ie the only real father) loses his kids, his wife shacks up with someone else, he probably has few rights in terms of visitation and the amount he has to pay as child support, but he’s a whiner if he complains and should happily compensate the new beau of his ex!
Gee, wonder why many white men see few incentives to starting a family.
Bringing women back in line, solving the Jewish Question, securing the White ethnostate … all of this requires building a new consensus among White men. I don’t think anything can stop us once this consensus is established.
Michael Bell: If it takes using game to bring White women into our midst, culture them, make them one of us, and secure our future, I am for it. It’s simply a matter of using the tools of a decaying society against it.
It’s difficult to believe this common sense statement could be controversial at a WNist site. There’s too much social conservative residue within WNism. I think there’s probably an over/under 40 gap on this.
Matra,
That’s it, I’m going to drive the car you bought me up to the courthouse right now and demand an increase. Wait, let’s double or nothing. I’ll go to the dentist right now and remove the gold caps I put on my teeth with your money if you can tell me what their favorite breakfast cereals are or prove with phone records that you made a single attempt to call them.
“You are not wearing a ski mask with an automatic weapon. You are not using physical violence to coerce anyone.”
Well no, I’m not.
“I don’t take any of this radical posturing seriously.”
If we will not do what we must then we are not serious.
“If given the opportunity, I’m not convinced a soul on VNN Forum would actually murder a Jewish child.”
To characterize armed resistance at the moment that it is needed (note I said the moment that it is needed) as the killing of Jewish children is rather hysterical, and I think disingenuous. Of course you are right about one thing, the Internet flame-warriors will most likely never lift a finger. Yet that does not obviate what may well be a necessity, and the longer down the road to destruction we travel the more necessary it will become.
So the biological father (ie the only real father) loses his kids, his wife shacks up with someone else, he probably has few rights in terms of visitation and the amount he has to pay as child support, but he’s a whiner if he complains and should happily compensate the new beau of his ex!
In a word: CUCKOLD
If what needs be done is done under the auspices of a consensus that makes such action ‘legal’ it will be much less messy, but only by degree. But if this thing goes south so significantly that our people are consistently subjected to the kind of organized terror that obtains in Mexico all bets are off. At that point the gloves justly will come off. We will do what we must.
CaptainChaos,
It’s not as naive to work toward a peaceful restoration as you’re thinking. Soviet Marxism quietly choked to death on its own BS. Maoism collapsed in all but name without a shot fired. It’s very possible that America’s declining condition and increasing unrest could compel the highly mobile Jewish elites to move on to greener pastures.
Kulaks,
You’re misinterpreting the meaning of the word cuckold. The cuckold is the man duped into raising another man’s children. Matra very states that I’m merely mentoring them, cleaning up their vomit, and hopping around on the DDR dance mat with them. The real work of knocking a woman up then wandering off is what being a father is all about. I’m the cuckold.
If child support is too low, I’m a cuckold. If it’s too high, Matra is a big victim. There’s nothing that will ever change what Maury Povich told me, that I AM NOT THE FATHER. But, you know, knowing that somewhere out there, some dude is paying me before he pays himself…it makes being a cuckold a little easier to live with.
Sorry there Wiki, I was reading it all a bit out of context.
Check this out from Lady Raine’s page…
My love and pride in my family is no secret amongst my readers or anyone in real life. I hold no allegiance to any friends, boyfriends, or anyone BUT family. I have 4 nephews, 1 niece, and my son (all of whom live with me). I spend MOST of my time being an Auntie and a Mommy….that is all I really care about. My family, my son, their successes, their wins, their losses, and their rapidly evolving characters. So many people allow “outliers” to become more important than Blood. There is nothing more important to me than my son, his success, and the pride in our heritage and family name. At the end of the day….husbands, wives, boyfriends, girlfriends, coworkers, and friends are just “filler” and distractions from what matters.
The love for a person’s family and children is the only “true love” and “loyalty” that I believe in. And really the only type that matters. Someday, at the hour of my death….I know that when I look back on my life, I will hear the laughter of the children I helped to raise….see the smiles of innocent happiness…..and hopefully even the joy of THEIR children being born. Family are the bright and shining stars in our lives….a bond that never breaks….and an unconditional love that I wish everyone could experience. Everything else is just “dust in the wind” as they say.
Buried under every brainwashed feminist attempting to do the man’s work of grappling with the political and philosophical issues is an honest lady yearning to feed babies and do laundry.
It is not that I think it bullshit per se to work towards a peaceful resolution, it is that I am very sceptical that it can be achieved. Btw, when Marxism croaked there were not tens of millions of alien people that needed to be weeded from their positions of power and otherwise removed from the living space. Not that I think mentioning such things in front of the lemmings is prudent – certainly not good PR at this time in building that consensus – but none the less important for White men who have any pretense to lead whatever to keep in mind. And without leaders we shan’t get very far.
“If you truly respected women, you’d want what they want. You’d at least want to COMPROMISE on what they want KNOWING that you treated them like dogs and slaves since the beginning of time and OWE US at least that much.”
__
‘Treated like dogs’??
And ‘slaves’… for ‘thousands of years’??
You are ‘owed’ as much??
Yet the ‘enslaved’ female, according to the happy hooker, concomitantly (and ironically) also wielded ‘massive power’ being “…in charge of the family, the sexual decisions, and the bringing/taking of life.”
What Orwellian double-speak!
*Now I fully appreciate why women were supposedly treated so ‘poorly’ throughout history – if this c-nt is any indicator – LOL.
(Don’t worry all the other ladies reading here, the above comment was a joke, since I don’t believe for a second women, at least in the West, were treated as bad as the paranoid schizophrenic beeyotch says. Women probably always were treated reasonably well – if for no other reason than to mate and breed with.) And this is no great revelation on your part – two-faced sh-thead “lady” rain.