Wik’s Picks: Top Ten White Sites

50 Comments

1. Good list. I like Majority Rights a lot too.

2. To the extent Wikitopian is a white advocate he’s good. To the extent he not only doesn’t see the magnitude of the Jewish tribal role in the race-replacement crisis but is ready to snidely attack those who do as fanatics or whatever, he’s bad. The more snide he is, the worse he is. Bottom line: I suppose Wikitopian is better than nothing at the moment BUT there’s a point at which those who oppose something but are blind to its cause, who because they’re blind attack those counterattacking that cause, thwarting them in their efforts to counterattack it — beyond a certain point such “allies” actually do more harm than good. Ian Jobling is a clear example and Wikitopian may turn out to be another. Certainly his snideness when mentioning critics of the Jewish role does not bode well. After a certain point these types are little better than the opposition. After a certain point, furthermore, a number of them actually switch sides and join the opposition.

   Wiki, try keeping a respectful tongue in your head when talking about people who’ve noticed something about the Jews which you haven’t got the brain connections to notice. You’re wrong, they’re right.

3. Wiki, you didn’t delete a comment of mine yesterday, did you?

4. No, that was probably me, Scroob. You’re a big yawn with your paragraphs of comments of grumpy sounding, deadly boring, “heresy patrol.”

   Why don’t you start your own blog and see if anybody finds it interesting, instead of writing these long, dull, ranting “heresy patrol” comments. It is a waste of my time to have to delete your comments from my posts.

5. Fred,
   Why, given how you just attacked me, should I treat you with respect? In barely over a paragraph, you accused me of treason, ignorance, and censorship – falsely, falsely, and falsely. You read this simple benign post and went off on some hateful tangent about the necessity of purging me for failing to be monomaniacal enough.

   That says it all.

6. By far my favorite is TOQ. Its the only place on the web I’ve been able to find partial translations, summaries and friendly commentary on Solzhenitsyn’s “Two Hundred Years Together”.

   Solzhenitsyn was one of the truly great and good men of the twentieth century. The de facto censorship of his work by America’s Jewsih controlled publishing industry was, for me, the straw that broke the camel’s back.

7. No Radio Free Mississippi?

8. Wik:

   You must add one more site, this one put out by someone with atrocious grammar who goes by the nom de guerre, ‘El Skunko.’ It was linked via TOO:

   http://judicial-inc.biz/

   Amazing.

   Bon

9. Obviously, I like Occidental Dissent. I also like reading American Renaissance and VDare.

   But, where is Western Voices World News?

   A new blog I have started reading is National Policy Institute Blog.

10. ”No, that was probably me, Scroob. You’re a big yawn with your paragraphs of comments of grumpy sounding, deadly boring, ‘heresy patrol’ […] these long, dull, ranting ‘heresy patrol’ comments. It is a waste of my time to have to delete your comments from my posts.” ( — Kievsky, #4)
    May one ask your reason for deleting two of Tanstaafl’s in the same thread? Just curious why we both got zapped. Are you imposing your own personal censorship criteria on this blog now?

11. I can only delete comments on my own threads.

    If he was talking about a comment on a post that wasn’t authored by me, then it wasn’t me that did the deleting.

    I have a very specific and practical agenda, and neither your nor Tanstaafl’s comments contribute anything to it.

12. Western Voices World News
    http://www.wvwnews.net/

    EAU (European Americans United)
    http://www.europeanamericansunited.org/

    Culture Wars
    http://www.culturewars.com/

    Turnabout
    http://turnabout.ath.cx:8000/

13. I have a very specific and practical agenda, and neither your nor Tanstaafl’s comments contribute anything to it.

    This is exactly where you go beyond the “kosher conservatism” you advocated and that I criticized in Discipline in messaging; non-violence as a protective shield, and right into bolshevism. I can’t wait to find out what else there is to your agenda.

    I agree in every respect with the negative opinion Fred expressed above concerning Wikitopian’s snide advocacy. As Wiki made clear in Monkeys on the Moon, he has a strange notion of advocacy that includes blaming Whites more than anybody else. His reference to his former role at AR and his response here to Fred’s criticism make it plain that the urge to purge comes from his own mind, not Fred’s.

    If you two gentlemen, Kievsky and Wiki, are going to hold forth on controversial subjects you should be prepared to find your opinions attacked, and you should also be prepared to defend yourselves with more than a delete button.

14. Boys boys boys! What is this? Cabin fever?

    Play nice. We all need to be White together!. Every-one else wants to kill us. Try to stop the beeyich slapping.

15. Yes’m. 🙁

16. “By far my favorite is TOQ. Its the only place on the web I’ve been able to find partial translations, summaries and friendly commentary on Solzhenitsyn’s “Two Hundred Years Together”.

    Here’s Richard Pipes’ (Daniel’s dad) ) review of the book. http://www.ncsj.org/AuxPages/112502TNR.shtml.
    This article used to be archived at Benador Associates http://benadorassociates.com/ which is/was a Jew heavy neocon speakers bureau. It looks like Benador Associates has been turned into a Russian bride brokerage. How weird.

17. Some clarifications and corrections:

    1. The Occidental Observer on the one hand and The Occidental Quarterly/TOQ Online on the other are separate entities. It is easy to believe otherwise because of the overlap of names, focus, writers, and occasional articles, so it needs clarifying.

    2. Some history: The Occidental Observer was originally a webzine spinoff of TOQ. It was Kevin MacDonald’s project from the beginning. I was never the editor of the Observer. After a while, because of issues of funding and personnel, Dr. MacDonald took the Observer off on its own (No need for alarm here. We are all friends.)

    3. Since TOQ needed a webzine and an upgraded website, I created TOQ Online, which went online on April 17, 2010. I am the editor of TOQ the print journal and TOQ Online.

    4. Alex Kurtagic writes for TOQ, TOQ Online, and The Occidental Observer. He is a valued friend and colleague. But he is not the leader, editor, or eminence grise of any of these publications.

    5. Occidental Dissent is Hunter Wallace’s blog. It too is completly independent of The Occidental Observer, TOQ, and TOQ Online, although again there are overlaps in names, writers, and themes.

    6. Since the movement is so full of feuds and rumors of feuds, it bears repeating that MacDonald, Wallace, and I are all on good terms with one another. There is no rivalry among the “Occidentals,” just synergy — and an outpouring of creative energy that cannot be contained in just one publication. In other words, our movement is growing, and growing not as a single organization, but as a network of individuals and organizations that have learned to work in harmony for the greater good of our people.

18. It’s also the place to go for Steve Sailer, who would be pro-White if it weren’t for his suffering some kind of autistic disorder.

    Maybe give him credit for disagreeing on principle and brush up on his objections to Taylor’s vision.

    http://www.vdare.com/sailer/051120_response.htm

19. Kievsky:Why don’t you start your own blog and see if anybody finds it interesting, instead of writing these long, dull, ranting “heresy patrol” comments. It is a waste of my time to have to delete your comments from my posts.

    Bwahahaha… hilarious. Well done Kievsky, and just when I thought OD was going downhill, there is light at the end of the tunnel.

    I definitely think James Edwards and his crew, VDare, AmRen, TOQ, TOO, Kevin MacDonald, VoR (especially Tom Sunic) and OD are playing important roles in our struggle. Minor players are also appreciated if only for camaraderie and increasing morale.

20. Greg,

    I first noticed Kurtagic at TOO and meant “leads” in more of a spiritual than an organizational sense. He sets the standard for fusing high-brow with high-octane. Thanks for explaining all that. It’s exactly as confusing as I figured it was. I’ll also assume that you’re not directly affiliated with The Adolescent Observer (NSFW), The Accidental Quarterings Online, and Oriental Descent.

21. Wikitopian

    Fred,
    Why, given how you just attacked me, should I treat you with respect? In barely over a paragraph, you accused me of treason, ignorance, and censorship – falsely, falsely, and falsely. You read this simple benign post and went off on some hateful tangent about the necessity of purging me for failing to be monomaniacal enough.

    That says it all.

    And the truth shall set you free! “I’m lovin’ it!”

22. CoCC, A3P and David Duke are doing good work, and I enjoy Stuff Black People Don’t Like for some levity.

    I have nothing against Stormfront, but I don’t think they’re that relevant anymore, although I think Don’s son Derek has a lot of potential and I hope he wins his case.

23. Fred Scrooby is old school — a noxious mixture of the anger and despair that grips the the angry, angry Aryans school (savor the irony) and the Philosophers school, respectively. Stated objectives to the contrary, apparently oblivious to the necessity of numbers, neither school cares much for its ability to influence the average white of any class conditioned in and by the present age (and circumstances). The Marketers should ignore both the Angry, Angry Aryans and the Philosophers and blaze their own trail.

    (I should add, anger and even despair can be useful emotions for a militant. But there is no need to wallow in them; they so warp one’s psyche, and thus subsequent behavior, that other people will have trouble taking one seriously. Despite not wallowing in it, anger is a cinch to recall the moment it becomes necessary — some nignog breaks into your home and sufficient rage to wrap a crowbar around his skull can be drummed up in milliseconds.)

24. Why do you guys not just call yourselves the Occidentalists?

25. While not directly a white advocate, Ted Pike of TruthTellers.org does openly oppose hate crime legislation and the ADL, and has been a positive Christian influence rather than a negative one.

26. Personally, I like Robert Lindsay.

27. “6. TakiMag

    “Damn you, CaptainChaos!”

    LOL!

28. Thanks for the link, whodareswings.

    What a completely inadaquate review on the part of Richard Pipes. If this were my only source of information on “Two Hundred Years Together”, and without TOQ it would be, I would have completely misunderstood the significance of the book.

    Pipes chooses to interpret volume 1 of THYT as an attempt on the part of Solzhenitsyn to clear himself of the charge of anti-semitism. (Such a charge is allegedly plausible because Solzhenitsyn, in a historical novel, potrays Jewish Bolshevik Alexander Helphand in a negative manner. Does Pipes seriously think Solzhenitsyn, or for that matter anyone else, should have attempted a positive portrayal of Helphand?!?!?) Since Solzhenitsyn abundantly compliments the Jews in THYT whenever he can in good conscience do so, Pipes deigns to absolve him of his sin.

29. Sadly, some of the websites you have listed, despite their merits, have allowed themselves to get caught up in the hoary old mythology of antisemitism, a disease of the mind of which European nationalists are largely free. The sooner we cleanse the Anglo-Saxon pro-white movement of antisemitism and kraut nationalism, the better. In addition to the factual problems of antisemitism, it must be rejected for the simple reason that it is incapable of yielding fruitful political gain. Anglo-Saxons will never embrace a movement which champions antisemitism and kraut nationalism.

30. Saying that all antisemitism is “mythological” and factually deficient because of some bad arguments and thus should be shelved is like saying that race realism should be shelved because of fallacious/pseudo-scientific statements that some people make.

    Saying that antisemitism isn’t a good political strategy is a reasonable question to ask but the answer has absolutely no relationship on whether or not we should study it in relationship to our current situation.

    Many of us want to ask the questions, study the facts, and state our opinions. They’re not going away no matter how much you moralize against them. You should tackle them head-on, if you’re so convinced about the factual righteousness of your position (which you have failed to do), instead of making moral arguments against them.

31. Stated objectives to the contrary, apparently oblivious to the necessity of numbers, neither school cares much for its ability to influence the average white of any class conditioned in and by the present age (and circumstances). The Marketers should ignore both the Angry, Angry Aryans and the Philosophers and blaze their own trail.

    The “necessity of numbers” characterizes *republican* processes – “republican,” as in Roman Republic and Weimar Republic.

    Once the polity is passing into global-class Imperium, only the votes of soldiers count.

    But that’s just me with a whimsical bit of philosophy for our trailing-blazing Marketers.

32. “a disease of the mind of which European nationalists are largely free”

    Jewish power in Europe is less obvious than in America.

    “The sooner we cleanse the Anglo-Saxon pro-white movement of antisemitism and kraut nationalism, the better.”

    Good luck with that, I’m sure it will end well.

33. Donald,

    “Saying that all antisemitism is “mythological” and factually deficient because of some bad arguments and thus should be shelved is like saying that race realism should be shelved because of fallacious/pseudo-scientific statements that some people make.”

    There are good arguments to support the belief that the Israel Lobby is very influential in the United States, or that to-day’s American Jews are disproprtionately liberal, but when one starts suggesting that Jews collectively are the historical enemy (or at least one of the main enemies) of Western society, and thus deserve to be removed, one is plunging into lunatic territory, and displaying a degree of petty chauvinism that is more befitting of an African (or a latter day Kraut) than a civilised Anglo-Saxon.

    Jews aren’t the problem. The problem is ideological. And the ideology has infected American Jews and Gentiles alike, though in different proportions. And that ideology is liberal democracy.

34. And that ideology is liberal democracy.

    And is one of the tenets of “liberal democracy” reverse discrimination?

    Use of troops to enforce busing of students for racial integration?

    Institutional suppression of scientific investigation and information regarding racial differences such as promote the necessity for AA/RD toward achieving, rather, a radical egalitarian regime to be imposed only upon those not of the means to escape to elite enclaves?

    The resultant homogenization and atomization of society, simulating the desideratum of an alien elite seeking to secure itself against nativist resistance?

    I could go on, and others might supplement this list. But a preliminary response to these considerations would be very interesting, were it to so adjust my own notion of what “liberal democracy” implies that LD remains recognizable as such after accommodating all of the ostensibly repugnant and antithetical developments listed above.

35. NeoNietzsche,

    We’re reaching a phase in the process after which the mercantile caste’s Masonic mythology, the ‘liberal democracy’ on which the American state was established, is no longer compatible with the interests of the usurpers. As a great philosopher once said: “The ‘Enlightenment’ was little more than the sunlight one enjoys when being transferred from one dungeon to another.”

    As you imply, they’re transitioning the masses away from America’s founding mythology and toward a sort of decadent self-worship which will be their demise. They’ve mistaken influence for control. They’ve mistaken patience for submission. They’ve mistaken indoctrination for wisdom. Their stratospheric success lies in the Orthodox Jewish GES which propelled them to such heights. But they’re proud, now. They fancy themselves to be global despots and casually deny the God who empowered them.

    If the Jewish God can’t cut them down, the Gods of the Copybook Headings most certainly will.

36. Yosemite:

    First off, liberalism and democracy do not explain the situation we’re in. We did not vote for race replacement or mass immigration.

    Secondly, antisemitism comes in varied forms. Much of it is, in fact, kooky as you say. However, it is not fair to paint with a broad brush – not all of us believe Jews are the historical enemy (as you put it) but rather that they have had a decisively key role in bringing us to where we are today. The evidence supporting this view is quite solid.

    Many of us who discuss Jewish influence do not particularly address any sort of solution of the likes of deportation or mass murder so your charge is rather unfair. Kevin MacDonald himself only suggests that in order for whites to survive, we should act more like Jews – he suggest nothing like pogroms and such.

37. Yosemite, Foxnews, Free Republic, and the Hannity Web site might be more your speed than sites like this one. There you will find many people who believe in the “hoary” mythology of antisemitism, just like you do.

38. Jews aren’t the problem. The problem is ideological. And the ideology has infected American Jews and Gentiles alike, though in different proportions. And that ideology is liberal democracy.

    And as always, the question you fail to address is, where did the ideology come from?

    Common sense tells us the ideology comes from those whose interests it serves.

39. Andrew Anderson,

    “Yosemite, Foxnews, Free Republic, and the Hannity Web site might be more your speed than sites like this one. ”

    Absolutely not. Sean Hannity and his ilk stand for liberal capitalist democracy. They are liberals. They believe that everything accomplished by Oliver Cromwell, the French Revolution, and the American Revolution is good. They do not stand for the prior order, the arrangement that existed before liberalism and democracy. I am a conservative. I stand for the ancient values of monarchy, tradition, racial purity, and empire – not the degenerate materialistic values of democracy, equality, trade, commerce, capitalism, and that idolatry of mere speed and movement which the liberal glorifies as “progress”.

    Donald and NeoNietzsche,

    “First off, liberalism and democracy do not explain the situation we’re in. We did not vote for race replacement or mass immigration.”

    When I say that liberal democracy is to blame for the situation that the white race is in, I do not mean that the white race voted for its own replacement. What democracy has done is demoralised the our people, making them apathetic and indifferent to its own demise. How does democracy have a demoralising effect? By sugesting that any principle or belief, no matter how profound or sacred, can be overturned, refuted, nullified by the mere reckoning of carcasses, the mere weighing of bones and blood. This has made our people materialistic, shallow minded, apathetic, and indifferent to their own demise as a people. Moreover, capitalism and free enterprise – against which the kings of old fought tooth and nail – have created an international movement of labour, thus adding a materialistic incentive to mass immigration, in addition to the egalitarian justifications. And once the aliens are imported, the bourgeois cry for political equality inevitably morphs into a national clamor for racial and social equality. All of these tendencies – equality, capitalism, mass immigration, and democracy – are intimately interconnected. Long story short, “liberalism”, both in its classical and contemporary senses (they are phases of the same phenomon), has created the conditions under which race replacement is all but inevitable.

40. Yosemite:

    While your criticisms of liberalism, democracy, and capitalism are valid, it is not a sufficient explanation as to why America is in the racial situation it is in.

    The whites in America had a healthy racial worldview in the early to mid 20th century that Jews systematically worked to destroy for many decades. Jews made racialism a pathology in academia, used their enormous influence in the media to spread propaganda, legislated from the bench as judges and justices, and used their ethnic pressure groups to tell sob stories to the American public.

    I should also add that Japan and Korea are liberal nations, under the yoke of American influence but do not face race-replacement – no one is seeking to race-replace those people and undermine the healthy racial and ethnic norms of those people.

    The most significant legitimate blame that can be pinned on American whites is that we are only weakly ethnocentric and are thus open to the sort of attack that has occurred against us. In fact, if you read all of the KMac works as you claim to have, you would have seen numerous examples of how non-liberal societies were infiltrated by Jews, i.e. as court Jews, who collaborated and corrupted the indigenous aristocracy against the interests of the people. But you haven’t, so of course you aren’t particularly aware of these historical facts.

41. Kievsky
    No, that was probably me, Scroob. You’re a big yawn with your paragraphs of comments of grumpy sounding, deadly boring, “heresy patrol.”

    Ironic that you call Scrooby the heresy patrol as you use your moderator position to erase heresies from the comments.

42. Donald (why do you use your given name? This isn’t group therapy. Use of the given name implies a degree of friendship that is impossible in an internet forum or blog. I only call my closest friends and relatives by their given name; everyone is referred to by his surname.),

    Japan and Korea are ethnic nations and have a strong sense of national cohesion. America is a civic nation. It doesn’t have natonal cohesion in the way that Korea and Japan do because America has a long history of assimilating millions of non-Anglo-Saxon white minorities – the Irish, the Germans, the Italians, the French, the Scandinavians, etc. – thus diluting and undermining its own ethnic identity. Why care about the continuation of an ethnic group that you hardly feel to be your own? When any kraut can become an American, you don’t have a particularly strong sense of belonging to your own group. Post-1964 immigration is merely the latest phase of the same American phenemonon.

    With respect to their liberal political tendencies, the Jews are not unlike many other unassimilated white immigrant minorites in America – the disproprtionate influence of Irish-Americans in pushing their own anti-Anglo agenda in the form of liberal reforms is documented by Mr. Roberston in The Dispoessed Majority, for instance. And considering that Kevin MacDonald uses highly selective evidence, cites documents known to be forgeries as though they were authetnic, quotes David Irving as a credible historian, relies on outdated evolutionary theories such as group selection, and makes elementary statistical blunders, almost everything he says about Jewish-Gentile relations must be taken with a grain of salt. As an example of selective evidence, it’s worth noting that at the same time that Jews were overrepresented in the Boas anthropological school, they were also overrepresented among eugenicists. And while to-day we have such Jews as Gould and Lewontin representing the egalitarian and environmentalist argument in the race-IQ controversy, we have on the hereditarian side such lumaries as Hans Eysenck (half Jew), Arthur Jensen (part Jewish), Steve Pinker, Michael Levin, and numerous Jews within sociobiology. Perhaps the Jews are just all-around overreprented in academia because of their higher IQ? Surely that would at least account for part of the difference. MacDonald also neglects to mention egalitarian schools of thought, contemporary to Boasian anthropology, that were almost exclusively Gentile in origin, such as behaviouralism in psychology (Watson, Skinner, Pavlov), a strictly environmentalist and egalitarian school of thought.

43. “… but when one starts suggesting that Jews collectively are the historical enemy (or at least one of the main enemies) of Western society, and thus deserve to be removed, one is plunging into lunatic territory, and displaying a degree of petty chauvinism that is more befitting of an African (or a latter day Kraut) than a civilised Anglo-Saxon.”

    Yosemite likes to throws out the “K word, but not the “N” word. He thinks there MIGHT be some evidence for AIPAC influence on American foreign policy and hectors us on anti-semitism in too many of his posts here. If he is supposed to be the epitome of the “civilized Anglo Saxon” than I will personally see to it that he’s frog marched back into the belching gas chamber furnaces behind his holy picklesnoot pals. Look around, there’s a Jew at every choke point in this diseased society. Yosemite is obviously a new strain of enabler. I’m afraid he’s going back to Babylon, too.
    Ihr treu und aufrichtig erbegener,
    Oskar Dirlewanger

44. Yosemite,

    It is hardly unreasonable for me to use my name on the form. I could care less whether someone has a psuedonym or a real name here. You have no idea if it is my real name or not anyway, so its irrelevant to discuss the possible motivations of it when you can’t be sure that it is even my name. A rather odd comment for you to make.

    America is a civic nation. It doesn’t have natonal cohesion in the way that Korea and Japan do because America has a long history of assimilating millions of non-Anglo-Saxon white minorities – the Irish, the Germans, the Italians, the French, the Scandinavians, etc. – thus diluting and undermining its own ethnic identity

    Americanism had always been about whiteness, particularly Northern European whiteness. While you are correct about the civic and assimilationist nature of American identity, that was not reserved for non-whites until Jews perverted the notion of American civic virtues into some sort of universalist notion.

    I am disappointed but not surprised that you have adopted the anti-racist argument against racialism. It is telling.

    Why care about the continuation of an ethnic group that you hardly feel to be your own? When any kraut can become an American, you don’t have a particularly strong sense of belonging to your own group

    Because I hold far more in common with my fellow white man than I do with the hordes of random Mestizos, Chinese, Indians, and so forth that are race-replacing us. Implicit whiteness in white flight and the tea party movement is a testament to the validity of whiteness being a valid cultural and thus ethnic identity for us.

    the disproprtionate influence of Irish-Americans in pushing their own anti-Anglo agenda in the form of liberal reforms is documented by Mr. Roberston in The Dispoessed Majority

    While it is true that the Irish have had a history of resentment agaisnt the Anglo majority and collaboration in some of these measures, the Irish influence is particularly weak as compared to the Jewish influence. Additionally, the Irish have more-or-less assimilated into the generic White American identity, whereas Jews have not. Jews remain a distinct and hostile minority who have a strong opposition to assimilation and intermarriage.

    And considering that Kevin MacDonald uses highly selective evidence, cites documents known to be forgeries as though they were authetnic

    (1) Selective use of evidence is how researchers work; this is not a valid criticism
    (2) What documents?

    quotes David Irving as a credible historian

    Just because you disagree with Irving doesn’t invalidate MacDonald’s general thesis or arguments as pertaining to Jewish influence.

    relies on outdated evolutionary theories such as group selection

    Just because something is old doesn’t make it obsolete. If you have a substantive objection to some particular theory that MacDonald holds, please make it.

    and makes elementary statistical blunders,

    Yet you don’t reference them here, and even if he did make some sort of mistake, it would not invalidate his arguments re: Jews unless you such blunders were made in regards to that particular research.

    almost everything he says about Jewish-Gentile relations must be taken with a grain of salt.

    You haven’t made a particularly strong case against MacDonald, you merely dislike how he presents his argument, you dislike that he associates with David Irving, and you think he has made statistical errors (but you wont cite them).

    it’s worth noting that at the same time that Jews were overrepresented in the Boas anthropological school, they were also overrepresented among eugenicists.

    So what? How does that change anything? The eugenics movement was never a threat to Jews to begin with and is only pathologized in the modern era because of its association with Nazis. Of all the things we can complain about, eugenics being demonized isn’t near the top of the list.

    we have on the hereditarian side such lumaries as Hans Eysenck (half Jew), Arthur Jensen (part Jewish), Steve Pinker, Michael Levin, and numerous Jews within sociobiology

    And I commend them and welcome these Jews as fellow brothers.

    But that doesn’t invalidate the general thesis that Jews have played a key negative role in bringing us to our present-day racial situation.

    Perhaps the Jews are just all-around overreprented in academia because of their higher IQ?

    But that isn’t the argument – the argument is that Jews are overrepresented in anti-racist and leftist causes. We wouldn’t complain about smart Jews being overrepresented in academia if they weren’t explicitly attacking white identity, racial science, and so forth.

    MacDonald also neglects to mention egalitarian schools of thought, contemporary to Boasian anthropology, that were almost exclusively Gentile in origin, such as behaviouralism in psychology (Watson, Skinner, Pavlov), a strictly environmentalist and egalitarian school of thought.

    MacDonald doesn’t talk about these things because his goal isn’t to analyze liberalism, his goal is to analyze the pernicious role of Jews in perverting existing gentile culture. Boasian anthropology explicitly sought to undermine – and was successful at it – the racialist world view. Can you say the same thing for behaviouralism?

45. Note to the commenters: Yosemite is a half-Asian. This information was revealed here months ago. He also used to be one of the more extreme anti-semites.

46. I was suggesting that because Jews have a higher average intelligence, they will be found overrepresented in a wide variety of disciplines and schools of thought, whether as physicists, mathematicians, psychologists, or cultural anthropologists. What Kevin MacDonald does is select the “bad” (or, if you prefer, “anti-Gentilic”) movements in which Jews have been overrepresented, neglecting to mention the extent to which they were represented among the critics of those movements, thus giving a distorted picture of reality; and also failing to take into account contemporary egalitarian and environmentalist schools of thought that were strictly Gentile in origin.

    As an example of his statistical blunders, he mentions that the Jews were overrepresented among Russian communists, without mentioning that communism in its early phase was an almost exclusively urban movement, and the Jews a distively urban population. (Jews were then roughly 20 percent of the Russian urban population, and constituted a little less than 20 percent of the early Bolshevik leaders – as expected based on their population size within urban areas.)

    The rest of your arguments rely on the very assumptions that we are debating.

    “Americanism had always been about whiteness, particularly Northern European whiteness. While you are correct about the civic and assimilationist nature of American identity, that was not reserved for non-whites until Jews perverted the notion of American civic virtues into some sort of universalist notion.

    I am disappointed but not surprised that you have adopted the anti-racist argument against racialism. It is telling.”

    This isn’t an anti-racist argument. Sir Arthur Keith made the same point. As a rough analogy, one’s sense of ‘family’ would certainly diminish if any stranger could enter one’s home and would be regarded as just as much a family member as one’s own biological siblings, even if the said stranger belonged to the same race. It’s the same with the national spirit. In a society, such as America, in which there is a lot of social mobility, intersectional migration, and the constant assimilation of foreign elements, even if the latter belong to the same biological taxon as the founding population, national identity is diluted and undermined. You don’t feel like you belong to a distintive ethnic group, because of its lack of exclusivity. If a German and an Italian can be an American just as easily as a member of the founding ethnicity, what makes the descendants of the founding ethnicity so special?

47. Sam Davison,

    “Note to the commenters: Yosemite is a half-Asian. This information was revealed here months”

    I am not half-Asian. That is a monstrous lie that was spread by an individual posting under my username. I have already addressed this. Hunter Wallace has also been the victim of this method of libel.

    It’s true that I used to be an anti-Semite, though.

48. Steve Pinker is a typical Jewish dissembler on the issue of race (read ‘The Blank Slate’). Arthur Jensen is 1/4 Jewish.

49. “Yosemite likes to throws out the “K word, but not the “N” word.”

    I wasn’t talking about Negro Africans specifically, but the African continent as a whole. And considering how many British, American, Canadian, Australian, and white South African people the Huns killed in the course of two world wars, I admit that I have no strong fondness for the lot of them. I don’t hate the Negro. I regard him as an inferior animal. I don’t hate him any more than I hate dogs or cattle. He is as nature made him. He is coded the way he is. He can’t help himself. The German, on the other hand, should know better when he exterminates millions of innocent people.

50. The Germans had moral awareness, yet killed millions of innocent people anyway. The Negro just behaves as nature made him. One holds the German to higher standards than the Negro. And that’s why I throw more verbal abuse at Germans than Negroes. It’s precisely because I think more highly of Germans than Negroes.