An interesting phenomenon has occurred regarding Sarah Palin. The intellectuals of the ‘dust-covered right’, affectionately known as the ‘paleo-conservatives’, have joined the neoconservatives and leftists in heaping scorn on the former governor of Alaska.
One such diatribe appeared today by an otherwise good writer, Paul Gottfried, while many other similar ones have appeared over the past few months in various locations. The crux of the complaint is that Palin is uneducated and revels in her lack of worldly knowledge, and appeals to those equally uneducated and reveling in lack of worldly knowledge, and this is bad because one should aspire to education and knowledge. Objectively, they have a very valid point.
To put this objective analysis in context, a quite interesting study was recently released declaring that “Liberalism, atheism, male sexual exclusivity linked to IQ” The study explains that “The reasoning is that sexual exclusivity in men, liberalism and atheism all go against what would be expected given humans’ evolutionary past.” This matches with other studies showing gays to have higher than average IQ. To override natural instincts requires an act of conscious brainpower, and those with greater brainpower are more likely to be able to overcome their natural instincts.
As noted in the article: “The study takes the American view of liberal vs. conservative. It defines “liberal” in terms of concern for genetically nonrelated people and support for private resources that help those people.” “Liberals are more likely to be concerned about total strangers; conservatives are likely to be concerned with people they associate with,” he said. Given that human ancestors had a keen interest in the survival of their offspring and nearest kin, the conservative approach — looking out for the people around you first — fits with the evolutionary picture more than liberalism, Kanazawa said. “It’s unnatural for humans to be concerned about total strangers.” he said.
The study also hypothesized “Bailey also said that these preferences may stem from a desire to show superiority or elitism, which also has to do with IQ. In fact, aligning oneself with “unconventional” philosophies such as liberalism or atheism may be “ways to communicate to everyone that you’re pretty smart,” he said.”
This explains the obsession with ‘objectively’ which has forever plagued our people. In one sense, it is essential for those at the top of society to maintain some sense of objectivity, in order to prevent society from degenerating into an African-style melee of constantly warring clans, gangs, and mafias. Yet, like many elements of liberalism, it has been elevated to the level of a religion, one which even the ‘anti-liberal’ intellectuals like Gottfried have fallen prey to.
From an unobjective standpoint, Palin and her legions of followers aren’t that bad, as far as white interests go. If every family was like the Palins: 5 children, self sufficient, and proud of both, this would erect a tremendous barrier to the jewish plan to permanently displace whites in America and all other countries. The demographic war on our people would be halted or reversed, and whites would not be so beholden to the Bolshevik style nanny-state.
Obviously Palin and friends have some flaws: support of Israel and the dysgenic ‘culture of life’ policies advanced by the evangelical Christians and embodied in Palin’s flaunting of her Down Syndrome child. However, the most important central, uniting goal of jews has never been support for the state of Israel, but creating a safe haven for the diaspora in the way described by longtime activist Earl Raab in his 1995 book ‘Jews and the New American Scene’: “The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.
We [i.e., Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible ‘and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.”
This ‘American climate of opposition to bigotry’ they have been nourishing is the ‘objectivity as a religion’ to which conservative intellectuals, even iconoclasts like Gottfried, have fallen prey to. This is what we must take in mind when we review the criticism by ‘conservative intellectuals’ of Palin and friends which is most applauded by race realists: that Palin and the ‘Tea Party’ crowd are uneducated and revel in their ‘ignorance’. As noted before, this an objectively valid criticism. But how bad is it?
The average working and middle class white people may not be brimming with intellectual vigor, but neither are they suicidically stupid. Most people note cause and effect in some form, and are aware at some level that “the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” If a series of ships sailing to a particular area disappear, people stop sailing there. If people who get bit by a certain type of snake tend to die, people stay away from snakes that look like that. Rats and the bubonic plague are a prime example: the rats were not actually carriers of the disease, it was fleas on the rats, a fact which few if any of them knew. Yet they figured out if rats appeared, the bubonic plague appeared as well, thus it was best to keep the rats away.
This describes the current situation regarding most middle and working class white Americans and their views of ‘intellectuals.’ They don’t know that 22% of Ivy League students are jewish. They don’t know that a large portion of university professors, much of the ‘mainstream media’, conservative think tanks, and ‘respectable’ conservative pundits such as Charles Krauthammer, David Frum, David Brooks, and Bill Kristol are jewish. They wouldn’t believe it if you told them, and would call you a ‘crazy nazi conspiracy theorist.’ If they did get it into their heads that this was so, they’d insist from the bottom of their hearts that it didn’t matter.
Yet, they know something is wrong. They trusted the liberal elites to run the country of the ‘Great Society’, and the country got screwed up. They threw them out and replaced them with Republicans, who drew on their network of think tanks to staff their administration, and things didn’t get any better. They threw them out and replaced them with smart, sensible, calm, clean, articulate Obama, and things continued to get worse. People of the Palin fan type have figured this out, and concluded that relying on elites and suits has led to the demise, therefore they shall revel in anti-intellectualness and lack nuanced reasoning and worldly knowledge.
As noted by Gottfried in his recent article: “Sarah’s prominence on the American right might seem to some to be disproportionate to what she has shown in terms of verbal facility or knowledge about current events…when she displayed a woeful ignorance of foreign affairs, was not a leftist ambush but a shocking revelation.”
This actually appeals to her fans, as Gottfried finds: “Sarah taps a populist vein, which is peculiarly American. Unlike its European bourgeois counterpart, typified by a movement such as the Lega Nord, American populism equates corniness with anti-elitism.” “Further, her education at a community college and at the University of Idaho renders her even more attractive to those who are already inclined to like her: her lack of impressive educational credentials betokens the lack of the snobbery that is identified with the bearers of Princeton or Harvard degrees.”
Gottfried, like others in the ‘intellectual conservative movement’, reacts with dismay: “If the American Left stresses victimhood, managerial control, and Political Correctness, then the American populist Right exalts PLAINNESS. In a campaign speech I heard the then Republican governor of Wisconsin Lee Dreyfuss give in Madison in 1980, the speaker electrified the crowd by proclaiming: “We’re all descended from the scum and refuse of the Old World.” As Dreyfuss finished this sentence, the ecstatic lady sitting next to me cried out: “That was really rightwing!” That, by the way, was the last time I attended a Republican rally, as a party member or even as an outsider.”
Simply giving up and dismissing these people as worthless is the wrong path to take. For a people to adopt a new way of thinking, they must first throw off the old way of thinking. This is how the radical multiculturalists came into power through cultural Marxism: before the tenents of cultural Marxism could be established as policy, they first had to destroy the old order, which is why they relentlessly attacked Christianity, patriotism, ‘family values’, and everything associated with the old traditional way of thinking. Once these institutions were destroyed, they were able to move in and establish a new order, a Bolshevik style nanny state.
We are now at the stage where the Bolshevik style nanny state is beginning to crumble, insofar as its mental hold on the white masses goes, aided by new forms of communication which make it more difficult for the jewish led elites to conceal the fact that their nanny state can’t deliver on the promises it made. For people to be able to once again adopt a folkish way of life, it is essential that their misplaced trust in the institutions of the Bolshevik style nanny state be destroyed.
Under this analysis, the anti-intellectualism and anti-establishmentism of the Palin fans should be encouraged and embraced, rather than ridiculed and looked upon with disdain. Not because it is facially good at an objective level to mock intellectuals, and not that Palin offers any great alternative plan, but because the current intellectual establishment in charge is fully determined to crush and destroy any chance of a white homeland. Before people will tune in to us, they must first tune out the garbage emitted by the current establishment.
Once we step outside the trap of objectivity, we can analyze the anti-intellectualism of the Palin fans in the light of “is this good for whites?” Clearly it is, as it is combats the demographic war on whites, and blocks the transmissions of the cultural Marxists that currently occupy America’s educational system and ‘inside the beltway’ establishment.
The problem with philo-Palinism isn’t that Palin is too dumb to govern well, it’s that she’s so dumb that she’ll be putty in the hands of the jews. Even more so than the somewhat smarter George W. Bush. Remember, in the end the jews could not get W to attack Iran. Even he balked at that neocon suggestion. Maybe he knew enough about the world oil market (from his days as a failed oil businessman) to realize that such an attack would drive oil prices to economically devastating levels, whatever the success or failure of the attack itself.
Palin wouldn’t have even that foggy context to evaluate the plans presented to her by her zionist masters.
Any analysis of working class/middle class whites, including Sarah Palin fans, is incomplete without reference to that group of people’s number one source of information and indoctrination – TV and radio. These people have their understanding of the world and their place in it from Rush Limbaugh and FOX News. That’s the starting point for understanding them. Unless you talk to these people first hand, you cannot comprehend how much of their reality is shaped by their favorite actors. You are almost dealing with a religious movement.
I’m not some great intellectual but 20 years of noticeable decline and demographic change, 9/11 and the financial collapse in this country motivated me to do some research to figure out what was going on. If I can do it so can others. Sarah Palin is not good for Whites. Besides her media image of being a inexperienced moron, she is a zionist traitor who will continue the status quo just like Obama and Bush. This might escape some people but this woman married a mixed race Inuit and her children are not genetically White. There is also plenty of information circulating around about her jewish ancestry on her mother’s side.
Any analysis of working class/middle class whites, including Sarah Palin fans, is incomplete without reference to that group of people’s number one source of information and indoctrination – TV and radio.
Conservative college students aren’t much better. They get their talking points from the same jew publications that influence Limbaugh and Hannity, the neocon fronts The Weekly Standard and National Review. These tools still think invading Iraq was essential to the war on terror, which is still their top priority even as the country falls into depression.
I was going to say Sarah Palin isn’t bad personally, but isn’t Palin’s husband one of those guys who brags about his Indian ancestry? If it’s any significant part of his genetics Sarah isn’t even a good implicitly white role model.
Agree with Rodger. She would be no less and probably far more of a disaster for Whites than Obama. The fact of the matter is that she is unintelligent, but what’s worse is that she is unscrupulous and traitorous in her devotion to Israel. I think that she is an example of the Jews intentionally choosing some empty headed woman to discredit all Whites. By holding her up as the “best” and “finest” of the Whites they bring ridicule and shame to all Whites.
OldRight
The enemy has a three step process – first, the infiltrate your group by mimicking your behavior, so you see them as “one of us.” Second, cause a conflict (or exist an existing one) in the group. Third, solve the conflict by scapegoating another faction.
The enemy always takes both sides of the conflict and then they all convert to the winning side.
Nonsense about “white conservatives” vs “white liberals” vs “white libertarians” is pointless, and bogus. Your politics are boring. Just understand clearly who is “us” and who is “them.”
isn’t Palin’s husband one of those guys who brags about his Indian ancestry?
For him it’s real, his grandmother is a member of the Curyung tribe.
Once we step outside the trap of objectivity, we can analyze the anti-intellectualism of the Palin fans in the light of “is this good for whites?” Clearly it is
This is one of the dumbest statements I have ever read. In fact, pro-immigration, pro-Zionist Sarah Palin is the perfect example of why we need more intellectualism in the movement, and not less.
I would also like to emphasize the following point, which is obvious to me but seems to elude others:
White Sarah Palin fans are no more “pro-White” than White Barack Obama fans.
Please take a moment to ponder the deep philosophical truth of this statement.
I think this article got it wrong. It was the paleo-conservatives and libertarians that went on a rant against this George Bush in a skirt, not the neocons. The neocons love her and her “wars, wars, wars” speeches, her McCainish stand on immigration and her ability to hypnotize lamestream conservatives with “I’m proud to be an American” while adorning herself with foreign flag pins, hex symbols and menorah broaches. I have to question the author’s intent on this piece because it sounds very defeatist, demoralizing and insulting to suggest that we give this woman a chance. If she had even a glimmer of racial consciousness in her she wouldn’t be married to a husband who is part Eskimo. No. Things are turning sour for Obama and a large segment of the public is questioning why things are happening and even buying into so-called conspiracy theories about the self-chosen. Awareness of jews or “anti-Semitism” as it’s called is reaching levels never before seen in this country. Our alien overlords are deathly afraid of the election of someone who is less than favorable of our foreign policy towards Israel. Despite their peculiar habit of talking out of both sides of their head, jewish support of Israel trumps all else even with those pretending to be anti-zionists. Sarah Palin was being spoon fed to the American public through the MSM and make no mistake, all those vicious attacks by the left against her were meant to galvanize Americans to her side and round them up into the controlled opposition of the faux right. Thankfully, most Americans aren’t as stupid as I thought they were because although she does have a following, most have rejected her.
Nonsense about “white conservatives” vs “white liberals” vs “white libertarians” is pointless, and bogus. Your politics are boring. Just understand clearly who is “us” and who is “them.”
Bingo.
There’s nothing – NOTHING – inherently pro-White about conservatism, and there’s nothing inherently anti-White about liberalism. The conservatives of today are worse on race than the radical 1960’s leftists, and the liberals of the early 20th century were on roughly the same page as today’s white nationalists.
Similarly, the implicit whiteness of the right (evangelical Christianity, country music, NASCAR, etc.) is no better than the implicit whiteness of the left (e.g. the “Stuff White People Like” phenomenon).
Does anyone here remember how popular Colin Powell was among conservatives in the mid-90’s? I don’t see the conservative fascination with him as being much different than the current liberal fascination with Obama. Similarly, Bill Clinton was like a male Sarah Palin with brains and charisma. That didn’t make Bill Clinton’s supporters “pro-White”, did it?
Sarah Palin will be used to lead the lemmings down yet another false path per their instinctive identification with the implicit Whiteness that Palin represents. That is not good for Whites.
Good article!
Education is to be rejected as Jewish Sophistry. (P.S. I work on a University Campus and am exposed to the lemming products of these institutions. )
The vast majority of our Ancestors were peasants, but that didn’t stop them from launching any number of healthy expulsions of Jews!
“This is not the time for irresolution. Our Race is almost certainly doomed, on account of its own actions in accord with Jewish demands during the Second World War (there are distal causes, of course). Since annihilation is virtually assured, why not go out saying what is true?
Christ, piss ant medieval peasants would regularly give Jews the boot. Are we of so much less stature than they morally that this is beyond us? ” — Wintermute (pbuh)
http://fallenfreedom.blogspot.com/2006/07/unavoidability-of-jewish-question.html
The author does have some good points about Palin, however these points are more suited to the Tea Party Movement in general. Palin should be rejected by Whites since she is married to a savage Indian (and no doubt will use Affirmative Action to get her kids into College… ahead of your kids White People!)
Hear, hear.
Palin is Joe Lieberman in drag. LOL.
I was going to say Sarah Palin isn’t bad personally, but isn’t Palin’s husband one of those guys who brags about his Indian ancestry? If it’s any significant part of his genetics Sarah isn’t even a good implicitly white role model.
Sarah Palin herself brags about her husband’s Indian ancestry and how “diverse” her family is.
Here is a part of a transcript of one of her interviews with Bill O’Reilly.
Sarah Palin herself brags about her husband’s Indian ancestry and how “diverse” her family is.
Palin is a proly twit who is WAY out of her league.
Sarah Palin herself is part Amerindian. That’s why she has an Amerindian nose. The Amerindian nose strongly resembles the Ashkenazi Jewish nose(it has a hook shape), which has led many WN’s to mistakenly think that Sarah Palin is part Jewish.
PALIN: I come from a very diverse state. My family is diverse. I’m married to an Alaska native.
That pretty much sums it up, no need for a prolonged debate about her IQ or policies. Although, ironically, for a lot of so-called white nationalists one can be racially mixed or even marry a non-white and be accepted.
This explains the obsession with ‘objectively’ which has forever plagued our people.
To which one must add the idiotic inability to distinguish between facts and values.
Thus “objectivity” becomes not the ability to see the factual world and the way it works with blazing clarity while maintaining a passionate attachment to, and forwarding of one’s own interests – rather, traditional European “objectivity” meant and means the surrender of one’s values and interests in behalf of identifying with an enemy’s subjective point of view and thus compromising one’s resolve with empathy.
Goebbels vented his own frustration with the German populace, amidst a war going against Germany, for their inability to refrain from being “objective” in this idiotic sense.
Solution:
Men can distinguish between facts and values – women cannot.
The Bourgeois is a woman – we need Warriors who can kill despite knowing what a bullet-wound feels like.
Empathy is fine, but when it becomes irrational projection it’s a problem.
All people are not the same or of the same value. Self-defense is you believing you’re worth more than the person attacking you. If you are incapable of making that distinction then you will be a victim. Our race is worth more than other races, if we can’t say that and believe it then we can’t defend ourselves.
One might add that it has become intellectually unfashionable to distinguish between facts and values in the pomo academic world and media.
This is facilitated by the convenient confusion of psychology with epistemology.
The psychological shortcomings of the womanly bourgeois in the inability to make that distinction is translated into a characterization of the accessibility of reality analogous to a dismissal of the visual world for lack of eyes with which to see it.
Epistemology does not properly satisfy itself with emotional and other sensory shortcomings until the quantum world is reached in reduction, wherein questions of uncertainty, complementarity, state, etc., are of the essence.
I agree with Hitler about Palin: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySfEZlpN2OE
That was a well-written piece!
“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.”
Earl Raab is right. White Americans no longer have the ability to democratically fix their country. At 60% of the population, we’d have to achieve 90% agreement on key issues to retake America. Even the Jews only manage to maintain about 80% homogeneity on political issues. (They usually vote 80% Democratic.)
We need to keep organizing the remaining Whites in this country, but should give up on taking back America. The only real hope is a secessionist movement or a mass migration to another less populated country. And both scenarios will very likely only succeed with a war-of-independence.
All people are not the same or of the same value. Self-defense is you believing you’re worth more than the person attacking you. If you are incapable of making that distinction then you will be a victim. Our race is worth more than other races, if we can’t say that and believe it then we can’t defend ourselves.
You illustrate the problem, Mark.
For the warrior, self-defense is stopping the attack, with lethal force if necessary, without regard to a calculation of relative value.
If you have to rely upon some notion of relative racial “value,” you are doomed, because your bourgeois morality demands “objective” validation of your values – of which there can be none. You fail to make the distinction, outwardly and inwardly, between facts and values.
Nietzsche was brilliant in his recognition of our barbarian ancestors as complete men and beasts, in their ability to take by violence that which they coveted of land and slaves, without psychic distress.
The bourgeois, on the other hand, has to be sent to do battle, by his plutocratic masters, with tales of the nasty evil-doings of the national competitor. Because the bourgeois boy has life-long been taught to “share” and be “fair” and was never taught by men to know the radius beyond which these sentiments do not apply in the world of kill or be killed – dominate or be dominated. The “enemy” thus cannot be an honorable combatant in an amoral world where fairness and sharing do not apply – for Mark cannot do battle without consulting an imagined universalist calculus of relative value that will lower the opposition in racial or moral terms below his own – thus Mark, our stereotypical European, will need a heavy dose of mendacious propaganda to get him going in the fight.
…thus Mark, our stereotypical European, will need a heavy dose of mendacious propaganda to get him going in the fight.
A fight that he cannot sustain because the mendacious calculus of value will eventually be exposed as such by contact with the enemy.
The only real hope is a secessionist movement or a mass migration to another less populated country. And both scenarios will very likely only succeed with a war-of-independence.
With what fully-equipped and heavily-supplied modern army?
[Colonialism means never having to be a grown-up.]
Neo responds to his own quotes, he’s something else isn’t he.
You presume too much and seem to be advocating our men should behave like psychopaths and commit mass murder.
You’re grasping at straws and everything you wrote is an inaccurate representation.
“Although, ironically, for a lot of so-called white nationalists one can be racially mixed or even marry a non-white and be accepted.”
Yes, examples of this abound.
If memory serves Frazier Glenn Miller fathered a Eurasian. (this was a very hot topic on VNN and ‘Mad Dog’ Martin Linstedt made much hay of this fact.)
There is also the case of Larry Darby. He fathered two bi-racial children then became a White Nationalist (allegedly). He was supported by April Gaede when he ran for office!! Gaede felt that this behavior could be forgiven. But should it be for someone running for office? (and ostensibly attempting to be part of a White Nationalist Elite?!?!?!?!?!?!)
Instances like this actually make me seriously consider Nordicism (I am half-Norwegian) and their concern with Nordic purity as a counter-active agent to the SHEER MADNESS of thinking that racially mixed people or mulatto-creators and mestizo-creators should have a size-able role in White Nationalism!!! Seriously this kind of business is utter lunacy!
Sarah Palin is mortal threat to the contined existence to White Americans and quite possibly to the human species. Her game is the race-replacement of Native born White Americans and a nuclear WW3 which ever comes frst.
A Well known black musician has writen that Sarah Palin when she was a bimbo sports caster, was flirting with him…while she was pregnant with her son who is now serving in afganistan. I find what this balck jazz musician wrote to be very convincing. Do a google search.
I agree with Aex Jones:Sarah Palin is a whore.
The Tea baggers are retards and so race-replacement entusiast Ron Paul. There is not enough time for this nonesense.
“Neo responds to his own quotes, he’s something else isn’t he.”
“Seriously this kind of business is utter lunacy!”
“Sarah Palin is mortal threat to the contined existence to White Americans and quite possibly to the human species.”
LOL. Whew! You guys are in fine form this morning.
Neo responds to his own quotes, he’s something else isn’t he.
I was going to ask whether quotes would have been more appropriate than italics – but it seems that no one would have been taxed with a misunderstanding, given the evident extension of the comment immediately prior.
You presume too much and seem to be advocating our men should behave like psychopaths and commit mass murder.
I have what was written, reasonably taken as an unambiguous expression of a familiar sentiment.
And the bourgeois emerges with the mis-characterization of classic conflict and the foundation of civilization as “mass murder”. What more need be said in illustration of my point?
You’re grasping at straws and everything you wrote is an inaccurate representation.
Of course it is.
The problem of government is not merely to have good laws on the books (Africa has loads of model constitutions) but to have rulers who are superior in intelligence, wisdom, and justice.
The problem with democracy is that it is not compatible with the goal of having truly superior rulers. Stupid and mediocre people have trouble recognizing intelligence. (They think that Frasier is highbrow, when really it is just a middlebrow view of the highbrow.) So how are they going to choose genuinely intelligent rulers?
Beyond that, we live in the age of militant, envious mediocrity — mediocrity that does not suffer the superior, denies the very existence of superiority, or does not think that it should matter in politics or education or society in general.
Democracy depends on the miraculous: on the inferior recognizing and submitting to the rule of the genuinely superior. Democracy requires extraordinary things from ordinary people. That is why it cannot work. Democracy therefore tends to produce leaders who are either mediocre puppets of alien interests (Sarah Palin, George W. Bush, Barack Obama and the like) or intelligent but unscrupulous and condescending (Bill Clinton and the like).
Greg Johnson. What you describes is not democracy..although it is called democracy…… Why the utter contempt for ordinary White Americans?
Rapist and war criminal Bill Clinton and his testoterone flushed bulldyke wife Hillary may have gone to Ivy league schools, but I don’t view them as more intelligent than the “average and ordinary” White American. Any “averqge and ordinary” White American can who uses his or her brain can mop the floor up with either of them or the tag team in a debate televised on national tv.
This is the kind of nonsense that you get from the HBD types such as Greg Johnson…..you know we afe all a bunch of retards compared to ivy lewague types such as Bill Clinton
Jupiter, are you trying to be funny (with no success, I might add), or are you just unwittingly illustrating my point that the mentally inferior cannot recognize their betters?
Bill and Hillary Clinton are obviously above average in intelligence, but I guess you have to be above average in intelligence to recognize that fact.
I accept populism as a principle of legitimacy: no system is just if it does not govern in the interests of all. The interests of the mediocre and the below average will be ignored if they have no political power at all, so they do need some sort of political power. But to repose too much political power in their hands — as in the United States — is folly, and in the end the masses will end up being screwed anyway, since their greed and stupidity will allow corrupt elites to come to power, as they have in the US.
The populist distrust of the intelligent is not a good thing, since elite rule is their only salvation in the end. First of all, it is hard for the mediocre to recognize the truly intelligent. Second, the clever bastards with the common touch that people should mistrust (Bill Clinton) are products of populism too.
The masses who distrust smart people are the same people who complain and joke about used car salesmen and lawyers . . . then get taken by them again and again, because their cynicism disinclines them to try to distinguish good ones from bad ones, and their mental and moral mediocrity makes it difficult.
White Nationalists should not place any hope in the proles.
Bill’s intelligence is extraordinary. Hillary’s intelligence is well above average. However, the matter of recognizing superiors is about far more than mere intelligence. Superiority is manifested in leadership, stewardship, and patriarchy. Jesus of Nazareth laid it all out in terms commensurate with his historical context, but the truth can be framed in evolutionary terms:
Evolution is a team sport. Superiority among the elites comes in the form of integrity and leadership. Superiority among the folk comes in the form of obedience and stewardship. The most unintelligent and contorted Orthodox Jewish peasant is superior to the tallest, most creative, and most aesthetically perfect Nordic hermit alone atop a mountain with his falcon and his bullshit.
To suggest that democracy fails to select for excellent leaders is to invert the accountability: to blame the folk. Our elites have betrayed us. Our aristocrats, priests, and merchants are among the most intelligent elites a folk could hope for. Yet, they’ve been the most despicable and arrogant traitors to their people fathomable.
Rapist and war criminal Bill Clinton and his testoterone flushed bulldyke wife Hillary may have gone to Ivy league schools, but I don’t view them as more intelligent than the “average and ordinary” White American.
Wow, the articles and comments posted on this blog lately just keep getting dumber and dumber.
“Earl Raab is right. White Americans no longer have the ability to democratically fix their country. At 60% of the population, we’d have to achieve 90% agreement on key issues to retake America. Even the Jews only manage to maintain about 80% homogeneity on political issues. (They usually vote 80% Democratic.)”
Earl Raab is just vomiting out the usual jewish propaganda designed to demoralize and defeat White America. The White European voting electorate was 71 percent of the population in 2008. When the Census does its population counting they don’t ask whether a person is a US citizen or not and all those illegal aliens, refugees, foreign students, green card holders, etc. are all lumped into the US population stats. Our actual population is not even 308 million but somewhere in the area of 270 million US citizens! I’m not saying a political solution will work but there is still time to try one.
It seems like any attempt to broaden the movement’s appeal is quickly shot down. White people are doomed by their own in-group status competition.
NeoNietzsche,
I don’t understand the point of your response. Are you suggesting we don’t prepare for a fight, or what? We don’t have an army. We don’t have a competent political movement yet.
Rodger,
The electorate in 2008 may have been 71% White, but 43% of them voted for Obama. It’s the split among White voters that creates our failure to solve our problems politically. I’m not against political organization – in fact I support it. But I also feel that political work will have very limited effects at this stage of the game. The best we can hope for will be to rally the faithful and come up with a solid plan. Most Whites are probably a lost cause.
Greg Johnson
No, I am deadly serious. What exactly makes the rapist and war criminal Bill Clinton and his bull-dyke “wife” intelligent? Did Phillip Rushton say they were? Are you challenging me to a debate on something?
Same questions for Wikitopian. You guys go ahead and worship the “cognitive elite” such as Bill Clinton. The populist distrust of the “cognitive elite” is absolutetly crucial for a grassroots Native Born White Revolt.
Jupiter,
Nevermind.
Greg,
I take no issue with the essence of your argument against Democracy. I think it is spot on. However, with regard to your example of Bill Clinton as being an intelligent member of the elite, I think you are mistaken. His SAT score was in the 1000 to 1100 range. While SAT is not IQ, it probably is a pretty good surrogate measure.
It has been my observation of both public figures and individuals in my own profession who succeed in climbing social and administrative hierarchies that amoral behavior, unscrupulousness, and sycophancy (completely unburdened by principle) are far, far more important qualities. I think in fact that principles become obstacles after a certain point in your career. This is probably far truer for politicians than people in most other professions.
That these folks succeed is more a reflection of the corruption of institutions and the cynicism of the elite that those who adapt themselves to their environment.
None of this goes against your argument against Democracy. I in fact agree wholeheartedly that Democracy has so many enthusiastic endorsers among our elites precisely because it is such an easy system to manipulate when the media is controlled.
Palin is not in any way, shape or form on our side. She is pro-multiracial, rabidly pro-immigration and a fanatical Zionist. Her career is a creation of the neocons. Only a complete fool would fall for her. I have little in common with uneducated fundamentalist imbeciles and I don’t want to live in a country where such people are running things.
A crucial part of the propaganda in the US is to convince ordinary White Americans to obey the “cognitive elite” such as the scummy Clintons.
Understanding how the economy works, the legal system, economic policy does not take any special gene based cognitive skills to understands. It takes motivation and desire to to expose the lies an deciets of Bill and hillary clinton and chief propagandist John Podesta. As Noam Chomsky has written all it takes is Cartesian common sense. We are all born with it. Just another way of saying that it does not require any deep level of intelligence.
Bill and Hillary Clinton are intellectually vapid in the way that Henry Kissinger is.
The law firm that Hilarly Clinton worked for in Arkansas wouldn’t even let her argue cases in court because she was so incompetent.
As a student, Bill Clinton was succesfull at spitting back the standard canonical correct answers within a framework. This is what all A students do. I’m not impressed.
I beleive in self-goverment. Ordinary White Americans are quite capable of figuring out the right economic policies and foreign policies that promote their racial interest. There is no need for this nonesense of of being led by some vanguard “cognitive” elite.
Chubby
What Greg was describing was not democracy. There is a such a thing as democracy. But it is not what Greg described.
Famous SAT Scores Converted To IQ Scores Name SAT Score SAT Score Converted To IQ Score
Howard Stern 870 99
Janeane Garofalo 950 105
Al Franken 1020 110
Paul Allen 1600 152
Bill Gates 1590 151
Bill O’Reilly 1585 150
James Woods 1579 150
Ben Stein 1573 150
Rush Limbaugh 1530 147
Scott McNealy 1420 139
Jennifer Ringley 1400 137
Al Gore 1355 134
George W. Bush 1206 123
John Kerry 1190 122
Bill Clinton 1032 110
http://www.kids-iq-tests.com/Famous-SAT-Scores.html
I secure my freedom with regard to the world in the degree that I make the world my own, i.e. “gain it and take possession of it” for myself, by whatever might, by that of persuasion, of petition, of categorical demand, yes, even by hypocrisy, cheating, etc.; for the means that I use for it are determined by what I am. If I am weak, I have only weak means, like the aforesaid, which yet are good enough for a considerable part of the world. Besides, cheating, hypocrisy, lying, look worse than they are. Who has not cheated the police, the law? Who has not quickly taken on an air of honourable loyalty before the sheriff’s officer who meets him, in order to conceal an illegality that may have been committed, etc.? He who has not done it has simply let violence be done to him; he was a weakling from — conscience. I know that my freedom is diminished even by my not being able to carry out my will on another object, be this other something without will, like a rock, or something with will, like a government, an individual; I deny my ownness when — in presence of another — I give myself up, i.e. give way, desist, submit; therefore by loyalty, submission. For it is one thing when I give up my previous course because it does not lead to the goal, and therefore turn out of a wrong road; it is another when I yield myself a prisoner. I get around a rock that stands in my way, till I have powder enough to blast it; I get around the laws of a people, till I have gathered strength to overthrow them.