Previous: Part One. Part Two. Part Three.
By the early 1960s Jean was living with Romain Gary in France. He had given up his diplomatic position due to the scandal involving his love affair with Jean and turned to writing novels.1 Diego, their secret child, would be raised by a nanny in Spain for most of his early life.2
Although Jean’s new life in France would lead to greater film success than she had in America, she nonetheless felt as out of place in France as she did in Marshalltown. “It annoys me when a Frenchman comes up and says, “oh, you’re so unexpectedly Parisian’ He means to compliment me, but I can’t help snapping: ‘I’m an American – Iowa American.’ I can’t imagine pretending to myself that I am anything but American.’3
Jean would maintain contact with her family in Iowa despite living in France. On her trips back to the United States in the mid-sixties she was exposed to the growing counter-culture. “[Things] are beginning to happen here. Bob Dylan – a real poet – is somewhat the symbol of the rising generation looking for new values,” Jean said. “As for the Vietnamese war, one finds it’s acceptable for young men who want to avoid [the draft], some of them from highly patriotic families of the Midwest. The beatniks have almost become respectable. Ginsberg is giving lectures at American universities. It’s undeniable: America is waking up.” Two years later she said, “If I had lived in South America I would have fought with Che.”4
In 1968 Jean was in Washington D.C. for the filming of Pendulum. On April 4, 1968 Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated. The blacks immediately rioted in the capitol and around the nation. “Filming there was dangerous in a way,” the director recalled. “We had a lot of extras dressed in police uniforms for a scene. We had to call off the shooting because when those extras were walking back to wardrobe, they were attacked by black youths.” Jean would lay the blame on Whites in a letter to her friend Vony Becker, “The indifference of the White population is almost total. Instead of improving conditions in the ghetto, they are buying arms to defend themselves. You get the impression of being in a profoundly sick country which doesn’t believe in its illness.”5
In October of 1968, Jean met Hakim Jamal on a plane trip to Los Angeles. He was born in Boston’s black ghetto in 1931 with the name Allen Donaldson. “Jamal” was a former criminal, alcoholic, and heroin addict. He had cleaned up his image and started a family, and he also now sported a beard and African ‘kofia’ hat. He was involved with the Black Muslim movement and held Malcolm X in high esteem.6
Hakim Jamal would eventually become one of Jean’s lovers and political contacts. Frequently he would ask for money. It was also through him that Jean would become involved with the Black Panther Party. Although Jean later claimed that she took two black nationalists as lovers, their real attachment was to her money.7
A mere cursory glance reveals the extent of her contributions to the Black Nationalist movement. She made a financial donation to the Black Panther’s free breakfast program in 1968.8 Later she began giving money to the party in incremental amounts of several thousand dollars at a time.9 Jean even paid for Hakim Jamal’s overdue membership fees in the Typographical Union in Los Angeles. She paid the fees by personal check, amounting to over $200.10 In another instance she gave the Jamal family a personal check for $5,000. By 1969 the FBI estimated that Jean had contributed at least $10,500 to the Black Panther Party.11 This is likely much less than the true amount of her contributions. Jean often gave cash and did not openly admit to giving money for fear of losing her career prospects.12
But the recipients of Jean’s generosity gave her little but ingratitude. Hakim Jamal’s wife Dorothy said that, “Jean was always renting cars for the Panthers, who generally tore them up.” In one instance Jean received a phone call from Hakim and she was reduced to tears. Her friend, actress Maureen Stapleton, took the phone and interrupted Jamal, “You’re a sonofabitch. Jean is working her ass off for you people, and you don’t appreciate it.”13
In January of 1970 Jean was filming Macho Callahan in Mexico. It was there that she had a affair with Carlos Navarra, a radical activist. She soon realized she was pregnant, and although she was still married to Romain Gary, they had been separated for some time. When she returned to France after fiming she began to reconcile with Gary and he would claim the unborn child as his own.14
However, due to Jean’s connection with the Black Panthers and other radical Black Nationalist groups, the FBI had begun to monitor her activities. They recorded a phone conversation she had with several Panthers that seemed to indicate, falsely, that one of them was the father of her unborn child. The FBI then decided to leak this information to the press in hopes of turning public opinion against Jean Seberg.15
On August 19, 1970 Newsweek published the rumor and a day later the delivery of Jean’s second child, Nina, had begun. The delivery was premature and the child died in the hospital. After the delivery several of her Black Panther “friends” came to her bedside and tried to take her credit cards and money.16 Romain Gary would later claim the Newsweek article was directly responsible for the death of the child, and would make this part of his libel suit. Jean’s increasingly wild lifestyle and her overdose of sleeping pills on August 7 may have had more to do with it.17
The funeral for baby Nina was held in Marshalltown. Jean confided in Rabbi Sol Serber during her return. “She was unhappy and disturbed. She felt that she had let her parents down. She knew all the gossip going around, and she was afraid it would hurt them,” he said.18 While in Marshalltown Jean also purchased a two-story, five-bedroom house in town to house black athletes attending the local community college. The people of Marshalltown initially showed enthusiasm for the idea, donating sheets, beds, and furniture, but there were soon complaints of loud music and parties.19 Many years later Jean was having financial difficulties and could no longer afford to keep the house. She would entrust Rabbi Serber with its sale.20
Jean would eventually have less and less to do with the Black Nationalist movement, especially after the death of Hakim Jamal in 1973. One of Hakim Jamal’s White lovers was Gale Ann Benson, the daughter of a British politician. She came to absolutely worship Jamal and changed her own name to ‘Hale Kimga’, an anagram of Hakim and Gale. They traveled to the Black Nationalist commune in Trinidad, organized by Michael X, a Black Nationalist from Great Britain. While Jamal was away, Michael X and several others stabbed her and buried her in a pit. The reasons for her murder are not as clear as the death of Hakim Jamal, who was claimed by some to have been killed for taking a White ‘wife’.21 22
Continue to Part Five.
1. McGee, p.101
2. Ibid., p.107
3. Ibid., p.122
4. Ibid., p.140
5. Ibid., p.155
6. Ibid., p.174
7. Richards, p.220
8. McGee, p.176
9. Ibid., p.177
10. Ibid., p.179
11. Ibid., p.187
12. Ibid., p.186
13. Ibid., p.183
14. Richards, p.232
15. Ibid., p.235
16. McGee, p.206
17. Richards, p.245
18. McGee, p.211
19. Ibid., p.213
20. Ibid., p262
21. ‘Buried alive…’
22. Richards, p.303
Cringe-inducing stuff.
Very good series of articles, Sam. People were so naive back then.
So I never even heard of this woman. I suppose she is a race traitor. What was it she did that mattered? Would any of us have ever heard her name if she wasn’t an employee of the Jew media?
Does this woman represent even a significant percentage of white women, or whites in general? Does she tell us anything about white people, or more about Jews and their control of media? In any large population, you can buy a number of women, and if you control the media and want to make them a star, or a “serious activist” or a trendsetter, or whatever, you can.
This series has little to do with white people, or this Jean woman, and more to do with what Jewish Hollywood and the media have chosen to promote in film/tv. You started out saying your choice was someone without a disordered family life, but what reason is there to assume that’s the case with this Jean woman? Again – aside from her being some sort of celebrity – i.e., an employee of the Jew media – how is she significant, or representative of whites in general?
As Donald Rumsfeld might say, absence of proof is not proof of absence.
‘aside from her being some sort of celebrity – i.e., an employee of the Jew media – how is she significant, or representative of whites in general?’
I fear her weaknesses are representative of *humans* in general.
Compare her failures to those of Aswad Ayinde:
http://www.israelforum.com/blog_article.php?aid=2659936
‘Aswad Ayinde, 51, is accused of raping five of his daughters repeatedly over a five year period and impregnating three of them. A total of six children survived this series of crimes, which spanned a period of about 20 years and ended in 2002. ‘
Both of them focused on the material instincts. Both of them ended up like rats in the experiments of Calhoun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink
Seberg was the typical hypersexualized female in a behavioralal sink; Ass-wad was the typical hyper-aggressive male in a defensible location.
If we are more than rats, if our instincts are more noble than those of rats, we must prove it by our actions.
Thanks Kievsky. It’s a shame so many people are still naive about these things.
SSSS,
Jean Seberg represents White liberals, race-traitors, and White people in general. If she had internal strength, or if her community had done what they needed to do instead of sitting around twiddling their thumbs – her life would have been different. If White people today stopped twiddling their thumbs and cheering packs of negroes running around a stadium we would regain our place in the world.
SD:
I could write about Drew Barrymore, for my generation she was the hot crazy white Hollywood actress.
“Jean Seberg represents White liberals, race-traitors, and White people in general.”
No, she’s an old Hollywood actress that tells us *zero* about anything except which white women Jewish Hollywood chose to promote.
You had the hots for Jean Seberg, I had the hots for Drew Barrymore. That tells us *nothing* about the psychology of white women, or the racial problems of white people in general, other than they you and I had the hots for pretty blondes we saw on the TV.
Analysis of Hollywood actresses is sexy but less worthwhile than actual personal anecdotes about white people you know in real life.
Seberg was a Hollywood actress, correct? Did I get that right?
I ask – how would picking a random street prostitute and analyzing her life be *any* different than this psychological profile of the pretty Hollywood actress?
She is not a significant public figure in any way other than as entertainment, and her main asset in the entertainment industry was obviously her looks – and from the pictures I saw, she was gorgeous in her day.
But how does psycho-analyzing her tell us anything about our racial situation? Is this not obvious selection bias?
You could take *any* rebellious white women – famous or not – and do this sort of story on her personal life. The fact that Seberg is the topic – and not some random, unknown, white woman who did the same things – itself, bias towards Jewish Hollywood. Is that not obvious?
“Jean Seberg represents White liberals, race-traitors, and White people in general. If she had internal strength, or if her community had done what they needed to do instead of sitting around twiddling their thumbs – her life would have been different. If White people today stopped twiddling their thumbs and cheering packs of negroes running around a stadium we would regain our place in the world.”
I think there’s something to this. The significance of a Jean Seberg is in the absence of her type among women of other races. You don’t find this sort of self abasing extreme outgroup altruism and racial masochism in any other group.
Stupid c**ts.
Sorry but I find no other words here.
You mentioned France.
March 13, 2010
French bread spiked with LSD in CIA experiment
Henry Samuel, Telegraph, Mar 11 2010
In 1951, a quiet, picturesque village in southern France was suddenly and mysteriously struck down with mass insanity and hallucinations. At least five people died, dozens were interned in asylums and hundreds afflicted. For decades it was assumed that the local bread had been unwittingly poisoned with a psychedelic mould. Now, however, a US investigative journalist has uncovered evidence suggesting the CIA peppered local food with the hallucinogenic drug LSD as part of a mind control experiment at the height of the Cold War. The mystery of Le Pain Maudit still haunts the inhabitants of Pont-Saint-Esprit, in the Gard, southeast France. On Aug 16 1951, the inhabitants were suddenly racked with frightful hallucinations of terrifying beasts and fire. One man tried to drown himself, screaming that his belly was being eaten by snakes. An 11-year-old tried to strangle his grandmother. Another man shouted: “I am a plane”, before jumping out of a second-floor window, breaking his legs. He then got up and carried on for 50 yards. Another saw his heart escaping through his feet and begged a doctor to put it back. Many were taken to the local asylum in strait jackets. Time magazine wrote at the time:
Among the stricken, delirium rose: patients thrashed wildly on their beds, screaming that red flowers were blossoming from their bodies, that their heads had turned to molten lead.
Eventually, it was determined that the best-known local baker had unwittingly contaminated his flour with ergot, a hallucinogenic mould that infects rye grain. Another theory was the bread had been poisoned with organic mercury. However, H P Albarelli Jr, an investigative journalist, claims the outbreak resulted from a covert experiment directed by the CIA and the US Army’s top-secret Special Operations Division (SOD) at Fort Detrick, Maryland. The scientists who produced both alternative explanations, he writes, worked for the Swiss-based Sandoz Pharmaceutical Company, which was then secretly supplying both the Army and CIA with LSD.
Albarelli came across CIA documents while investigating the suspicious suicide of Frank Olson, a biochemist working for the SOD who fell from a 13th floor window two years after the Cursed Bread incident. One note transcribes a conversation between a CIA agent and a Sandoz official who mentions the “secret of Pont-Saint-Esprit” and explains that it was not caused by mould but by diethylamide, the D in LSD. While compiling his book, A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA’s Secret Cold War Experiments, Albarelli spoke to two of Olson’s former colleagues, who told him that the Pont-Saint-Esprit incident was part of a mind control experiment run by the CIA and US army. After the Korean War the US launched a vast research programme into the mental manipulation of prisoners and enemy troops. Scientists at Fort Detrick told him that agents had sprayed LSD into the air and also contaminated local food products. Albarelli said the real smoking gun was a White House document sent to members of the Rockefeller Commission formed in 1975 to investigate CIA abuses. It contained the names of a number of French nationals who had been secretly employed by the CIA and made direct reference to the Pont St. Esprit incident. In its quest to research LSD as an offensive weapon, Albarelli claims, the US army also drugged over 5,700 unwitting US servicemen between 1953 and 1965. None of his sources would indicate whether the French secret services were aware of the alleged operation. According to US news reports, French intelligence chiefs have demanded the CIA explain itself following the book’s revelations. French intelligence officially denies this. Locals in Pont-Saint-Esprit still want to know why they were hit by such apocalyptic scenes. Charles Granjoh, 71, told the weekly French magazine Les Inrockuptibles:
At the time people brought up the theory of an experiment aimed at controlling a popular revolt. I almost kicked the bucket. I’d like to know why.
Leave a Comment » | News Analysis | Permalink
Posted by niqnaq
http://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2010/03/13/le-grand-freakout-de-1951/
——————————————————————————–
Hey Robert Reis, the CIA putting LSD in bread in France? Crazy story huh.
Everyone talks about the 1960s as the end of the old order. Remember the hippies and the LSD? The TV told everyone that was just what the youngsters were doing back then, right?
I mean, in California they had a guy giving away *free* LSD to hundreds of thousands of people during the outdoor music festivals and all. The magazines and the TV portrayed the whole thing as hip and sexy. Just a random thing?
Yet all the principals involved – from the musicians to the actresses to the producers – were from military intelligence families, and the drug dealers hardly spent any time in prison. Celebrity Professor Timothy Leary actually “escaped” from prison. Zappa was clear that he didn’t do any drugs of any kind, he was strictly an observer.
Alex Jones territory huh? Makes you feel uncomfortable just talking about, er, what would you call it? Chemical warfare?
Israel is the center of the international MDMA network. XTC the Love Drug – it’s positively Imm-esque isn’t it?
So we have a documented record going back to the 1950s and stretching until the the late sixties, where we don’t have any hard documentation, but it seem foolish to ignore the massive amounts of circumstantial evidence.
So – did it stop in the 1970s after the various Congressional hearings? Should we assume it’s not ongoing?
SSSS,
If you think my inquiry into the White-liberal mind is so flawed, why don’t you write your own? I want to understand why White people go against their own interests, squander their personal fortunes, and wreck their lives to help non-Whites. If you can come up with a good answer, I’d like to see it.
“I could write about Drew Barrymore, for my generation she was the hot crazy white Hollywood actress.”
You’re missing the point. Drew Barrymore, to my knowledge, isn’t heavily funding a violent non-White political party. She isn’t having love affairs with black Muslims.
“Seberg was a Hollywood actress, correct? Did I get that right?”
No. Jean Seberg made very few Hollywood films. Her best known is probably “Paint Your Wagon” with Clint Eastwood and Lee Marvin. She wasn’t popular in America – her main publicity was in France where she lived for most of her adult life.
“I ask – how would picking a random street prostitute and analyzing her life be *any* different than this psychological profile of the pretty Hollywood actress?”
Because the point of this is to understand White liberals… Jean Seberg was a White liberal and a racemixer. There is a strong ‘liberal’ bias in Hollywood, but not everyone gives tens of thousands of dollars to the Black Panthers and sleeps with black Muslims.
The only thing that I’ll admit to is a selection bias. I chose to study a person whose personal life was already available in biographies. This limits me to celebrities, politicians, writers, and the wealthy. Why do so many of these types actively get involved in anti-White causes? They don’t have to – they’ve got money. They could speak their mind and not worry about not having another job. But they don’t. So that’s another important question that we should understand.
“why don’t you write your own?
But then I’d be the writer and you’d be the critic lol.
I’m against the whole idea. You are doing a culture of critique against some poor blond lady that was brainwashed by the TV. You want to delve into her psyche, but it’s irrelevant. If she had seen poor animals being mistreated on the TV, she might have become a PETA activist instead of with the NAACP.
If there is a failure in Seberg’s life, it’s her father, family, and friends, who didn’t direct her natural, white woman instincts into a pro-white, pro-family direction.
But you want to find some psychological flaw in her and blame our problems on that. That not just unproductive, but it’s almost doing the enemy’s work for them.
I mean, in California they had a guy giving away *free* LSD to hundreds of thousands of people during the outdoor music festivals and all. The magazines and the TV portrayed the whole thing as hip and sexy. Just a random thing?
Yet all the principals involved – from the musicians to the actresses to the producers – were from military intelligence families, and the drug dealers hardly spent any time in prison.
Good points SSSS.
I remember reading a while back that the author of the silly ‘Anarchist Cookbook’ (a book that was prominantly sold in major bookstores – and where you still can find it in Barnes & Noble and Borders) William Powell, was the son of either an FBI or CIA agent.
Most agreed the book was not only stupid, but dangerous — if indeed a ‘R.E.A.L. hippie’ (LOL) attempted to in fact try to follow a ‘recipie’ from the book… well, I am sure you know what would have happened :/
Israel is the center of the international MDMA network. XTC the Love Drug – it’s positively Imm-esque isn’t it?
‘Imm-esque’ — LMFAO 😀
Good research and good writing.
Altruism, boredom and curiosity. Three impulses that whites seem to have in abundance, which are what I think drives all sorts of people in Iowa, or any other all-white environment, away from their roots.
I remember reading a while back that the author of the silly ‘Anarchist Cookbook’ (a book that was prominantly sold in major bookstores – and where you still can find it in Barnes & Noble and Borders) William Powell, was the son of either an FBI or CIA agent.
Most agreed the book was not only stupid, but dangerous — if indeed a ‘R.E.A.L. hippie’ (LOL) attempted to in fact try to follow a ‘recipie’ from the book… well, I am sure you know what would have happened :/
SSSS,
Found this review of that worthless collection of paper that buttresses what you and I say –
…It is well known that W.F. Buckley, the National Review editor, is a Yale graduate and once served the CIA in Mexico. (E. Howard Hunt, of Watergate fame, was CIA paymaster in Mexico City at the same time Buckley served.) …
Ah yes, good ol’ Billy boy Buckley — Kosher CONservative extraordinaire
…Her friend, actress Maureen Stapleton, took the phone and interrupted Jamal, “You’re a sonofabitch. Jean is working her ass off for you people, and you don’t appreciate it.”13
How apropos, since Maureen Stapleton played the Red Anarchist Emma Goldman on the movie Reds.
HA HA, Anybody not old enough to know who Jean Seberg was is hardly old enough to be a social or literary critic.
Beautiful girl. Terrible waste.
Why does this blog attract so many obnoxious idiots like SSSS?