Previous: How to Make a Race Traitor: Part 1.
There are four factors that push Whites against their racial interests.
1. Altruism
This is the biggest internal factor. Most White Europeans and their descendants have a high degree of natural altruism. The Scandinavian nations are noted for their liberal policies and welfare-states. These nations have more equal distribution of wealth than most “Communist” regimes.1 2 In a multicultural setting, Whites are easy targets for scam-artists and criminals because they fall victim to their own psychological projection.3 Whites assume that different races have, at heart, the same basic mental attitudes and desires. This is psychological projection at its worst.
White altruism is a positive genetic trait and, as Ian Jobling stated, increases our ‘social capital.’4 The only problem is that non-Whites do not typically share this trait and tend to break down White societies from the inside. In an all-White society there would be no problem with altruism. In matters of foreign policy and war, our nations have proven themselves quite capable of defending themselves from external threats – it is only when these threats become internalized that our societies fall apart. The only solution for this is the removal of non-Whites from White nations.
2. Alienation
The second factor is alienation from a White identity. In some cases this is perhaps an innate development among people with high insecurities. In many cases I suspect that it is the result of cradle-to-grave anti-White propaganda in the media and education system. Mainstream culture portrays racial solidarity among whites as abnormal and backward, while non-Whites are encouraged to stick together for their own interests. Can anyone imagine a White counterpart to Black Entertainment Television? What about a White counterpart to Ebony magazine? Maybe a White version of Miss Black America? The inability for Whites to identify with their own race and “fit in” leads to their adoption of radical causes that undermine their own ethnic group. Even organizations that are overwhelmingly White, such as the Republican party and other ‘conservative’ groups, are disallowed from having a pro-White identity.
Our problem of alienated White identity can only be fixed by promoting pro-White organizations. These do not have to be political in nature, but could also be cultural or economic. Simply put, we need an outlet for Whites with a political or creative drive. This is a tricky area because most Western governments have anti-discrimination laws that undermine the freedom of association between Whites. The British National Party has recently found out that White Britons are no longer allowed to organize for their own interests.5
3. Social Isolation
Many upper class whites are isolated from reality. Most White liberals seem to have grown up in all-White upper-income neighborhoods. Writers, politicians, and celebrities tend to not be around the non-Whites they so often support. Furthermore, upper-class Whites with high IQs tend to socialize overwhelmingly with other high-IQ individuals, few of which belong to the darker races6 All of these situations make it easy for upper-class Whites to be unaware of the tremendous difference between the races. This explains the existence of our current “liberal elite.”
The problem of ‘social isolation’ seems easily solved. When White people don’t experience life with non-Whites on a regular basis they forget the great differences that exist between our races. The “easy” solution is a massive campaign of race-realist education.
4. The ‘J’ factor
Even when I deliberately try to find other reasons for our racial decline, the Jews keep popping up. As T.E. Lawrence had a ‘genius for backing into the limelight’ I have found myself constantly backing away from the Jewish Question, only to bump into something, and then turn and discover myself staring directly at a Jew.
For example, during my investigation of Jean Seberg’s life, a life notable for its political radicalism and interracial relationships, there were astoundingly many Jewish influences. Both Romain Gary, her first husband, and Dennis Berry, her third husband, were ‘French’ Jews. The Jewish connection was not apparent at first only because both husbands no longer used their original names.
Among Jean’s cultural influences was Bob Dylan, born Robert Allen Zimmerman. She bought his records on trips to America and introduced them to her friends in France. She also spoke positively of the fact that Allen Ginsberg was lecturing at American universities. Ginsberg, for those unaware, was a homosexual poet and member of NAMBLA.
As I came to see the myriad of Jewish influences in Jean’s life, I also noticed that the counter-culture of her adopted country of France was also dominated by Jews. The 1968 unrest in France, which included a student revolt and nationwide strikes, was led primarily by Jews such as Alain Geismar, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Alain Krivine, and Marc Kravetz.7
In one my previous essays I pointed out that the ‘Civil Rights’ movement in the United States was dominated by Jewish leadership and organization.8 The anti-apartheid movement in South Africa was also led by Jewish activists. These movements swept away not only long-standing racial segregation but also worked to abolish the underlying awareness of racial differences. Jewish scientists such as Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Lewontin have worked to ‘prove’ that race doesn’t exist. The Jewish professor Noel Ignatiev has now issued a call to ‘abolish the white race.’9
As I said above, one of the steps we have to take is to spread the truth about racial differences. But race-realism will face tremendous opposition so long as Jewish influence exists within our media and educational system.10 11 Thus, waking up White people to our race’s problems will have to occur either simultaneously with our solution of the Jewish Question, or not at all.
1. CIA World Factbook
2. Graphic data
3. Description of psychological projection
4. Why Be Just?
5. BNP ‘whites only’ membership outlawed
6. The Bell Curve, by Murray & Herrnstein
7. The New Left
8. Jewish Activists and White Institutions
9. Harvard professor argues for ‘abolishing’ the white race
10. ‘Jews totally own the media’
11. Jews in American universities
“She also spoke positively of the fact that Allen Ginsberg was lecturing at American universities. Ginsberg, for those unaware, was a homosexual poet and member of NAMBLA.”
I understand there was quite a bit of correspondence between Ginsberg and Micheal Savage.
In the summer of 2006 SF Weekly sleuth Ron Russell plumbed the stacks in the Ginsberg collection at Stanford University and found the Wiener letters. In one, Wiener tells Ginsberg he’s been enjoying graphic sexual fantasies about the poet he now describes for radio listeners as a sicko communist.
“Watched a tourist from New Zealand taking pictures of Fijian people in the marketplace [and] thought of inserting my camera’s lens in your A-hole to photograph the walls of your rectum. I really do apologize, but the thought did occur,” Wiener wrote.
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2009/08/michael_savage.php
The point about “social isolation” struck a nerve. It is deeper than mere unawareness of the plight of Whites in lower socioeconomic classes. Whites occupying the upper strata of society are actually at risk, even if not immediately so, though they may not immediately perceive it. Many of them, if not most, are just plain luckier than their poorer brethren, not smarter. For example, if they chose to go to medical school, they were pretty much assured of a good job and income, but if they pursued engineering, they would be fucked right now as quite likely their job would be outsourced. If they pursued an academic career, there too they would be facing a hard life, a real uphill struggle with the ultimate success of tenure likely denied them to make room for the mud people.
Even if you are personally unaffected, a White man or woman who is racially aware of the predicament of his people, economically well off though he may be, is still very much isolated. There will likely be no one he can talk to about his thoughts and worries. No one whom he can share his concern. No one who gives a shit basically, as most of the folks who achieve success in this country don’t give a rat’s ass about anyone but themselves.
I have donated to many groups and sites. But really, I wish I could do so much more. I would love to organize like minded people in my area, all of whom are wealthy, but there is no way I can right now without putting myself and my career at great risk. I envy the Jews their solidarity and organization. There is nothing quite comparable in the WN movement. Hopefully, that will change. I really hope so.
I am cynical enough to see that our culture of punishment needs the crime to take place before, we can punish the offender.
We needed the Jews to become a hostile elite, and we need them to show themselves as destructive parasites, if we let them run free. We even needed the Jews to really suppress free speech, so that we can say with truth that the moment Jews comes to power, free speech is out the window.
Same goes for the immigrants that we accept, we need the ones who are unable to live in our culture, to misbehave and prey upon whites, so that we can say with truth, that the other races victimize whites the moment they get the possibility to do so safely.
Finally there is nothing better than the Negroes telling lies about white suppression, like in this video, as being falsely charged for racism by minorities tend to make the charged white become more racist, in addition to all the other white people who can see what happened.
I had no idea about Michael Weiner’s connection to Ginsberg. Disgusting.
Fjordman has seen the light.
Fjordman said…
I correspond with a person in Norway sometimes, a Leftist actually, but about as intelligent and sensible as you can get and still be left-of-the-center. He predicts that there will be a serious eruption of Jew hatred in the United States in the near future when the economy tanks for real. Unfortunately, few people will have done more to fuel this than Thomas Friedman, an enthusiastic supporter of the ridiculous policy of exporting democracy to Iraq and of the continued mass immigration of Third World peoples, policies that are now crippling the US economy.
If we take a friendly approach we can perhaps say that Ashkenazi Jews support ethnocentrism for themselves but obstruct it for European Gentiles because they fear a Nazi-like society. The problem with this is that if you seriously believe that the white majority are a bunch of crypto-Nazis in the waiting then perhaps you should go and live somewhere else. If I lived in a country where I thought that most people were just waiting for an excuse to massacre me then I would leave.
Besides, the truth is that while Jews have sometimes been mistreated in some European countries they have been generally well treated in the United States. This means that the mass immigration supported by people like Mr. Friedman is starting to look like a form of ethnic aggression to dispossess the white majority population. This is a dangerous policy that will fuel resentment. Moreover, it doesn’t make sense for Jews themselves to undermine one of the most pro-Jewish countries on the planet.
As I stated in one of my previous essays, the main reason for California’s rapid decline is a decline in IQ among those who inhabit that region. This is again caused by mass immigration. The underlying structural problem for the USA now is that US national debt is rising even faster than US national IQ is declining. As long as this trend remains unchanged, continued US decline is all but assured. Mr. Friedman is an Ashkenazi Jew, which means that he comes from the one ethnic group on the planet with the highest average IQ.
Yet while he personally benefits from high IQ he does not want to talk about it. The same is the case for author Jared Diamond, another Ashkenazi Jew who thinks it is immoral and “loathsome” to mention IQ.As I concluded in my in-depth investigation of human evolution and culture, Why Did Europeans Create the Modern World?, while Jared Diamond’s book Guns, Germs, and Steel contains some worthwhile parts, the overall conclusion is almost certainly wrong. You can just look at the state of California to disprove it.
California was by the 1960s and 70s the economic engine of the USA and by the extension the world. By 2010 it is close to bankruptcy. The reason for this is not that the geography of California changed, nor its plants or animals to any significant degree. What changed was the demographic make-up of California. As long as it was predominantly inhabited by whites it was a dynamic region. As soon as it become inhabited by Mexicans and other lower-IQ Third World peoples it came increasingly to resemble a Third World region.
Diamond is currently a Professor at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), which means that he can see clearly that his theories are flawed just by looking out the window.
Robert, thanks for that Fjordman clip. It was inevitable that he “get it”.
Can you post a link for that clip?
Fjordman clip:
http://democracyreform.blogspot.com/2009/11/nyt-friedman-compares-us-democracy.html
“Even when I deliberately try to find other reasons for our racial decline, the Jews keep popping up.”
That was my experience when I began to research the causes of our decline.
http://mangans.blogspot.com/2010/03/thomas-friedman-immigration-fanatic.html#comments
At 3/21/2010 09:40:00 AM, Fjordman said…
Meet your enemy.
A pretty good assessment of the situation, Sam.
The Jews are not trying to “destroy” or “undermine” so much as CONTROL. To universalize humankind through globalization (the ideal Jewish (Soros) end-state would be the ruby mines of Burma, where the quasi-slave labor force is controlled through a daily heroin injection) they must first corrupt individualist western civilization and eliminate its biological core: the white race. In Russia the Jews have already been beaten; in Europe and America the racial awakening of the whites has been delayed by the mechanisms that Sam Davidson so well defines, but here too organized Jewry will, after a desperate struggle, be rendered harmless.
I disagree about the part of point #3 that elite-IQ whites are unaware of the differences between races. Although the don’t put it in these terms, they want to placate NAMs through diversity-type initiatives, knowing that they themselves are exempt. Today’s liberalism is a bastard mix of economically-motivated NAMs and elite whites, who agree that working-class whites owe stuff to the former.
CompassionateFascist,
Why do you think that Russia has “beaten” the Jews?
This means that the mass immigration supported by people like Mr. Friedman is starting to look like a form of ethnic aggression to dispossess the white majority population. This is a dangerous policy that will fuel resentment. Moreover, it doesn’t make sense for Jews themselves to undermine one of the most pro-Jewish countries on the planet.
“Starting to look like” LOL, it’s been going on since the early 20th century, but really kicked into gear after WW2.
They have Israel now, Jews say it’s their insurance policy, their retreat. They can ruin white countries and flee there.
The nigger who did a drive-by firing his gun near my house an hour ago for no reason doesn’t make any sense either, but it happens.
This article ties into Altruism:
The Impossibility of Assimilation and the Blinkers of Superiority
EXPECTING Third World immigrants to blend into and embrace European society is about as naïve and idiotic as expecting malignant melanoma to blend into and embrace the human body. But try explaining that to a European automaton and you’ll duly be labelled every Marxist-coined term under the sun, from racist to anti-Semitic to homophobic. The crux of the problem lies in the fact that Europeans constitute the superior race, and as the superior race they’ve never been given the opportunity to experience a genuine feeling of inferiority, therefore they cannot even begin to imagine—let alone comprehend—what goes on inside the neurotic, paranoid mind of a Third World immigrant living in a European country.
Travelling to Third World nations and becoming the center of attention will not raise awareness amongst Europeans, either. For yes, they will very much be in the minority, and yes, they will very much be stared at, but for all the right reasons: beauty, culture, wealth, achievement and civilisation. And subconsciously Europeans know that this is why they are being stared at, and consequently these stares don’t give birth to feelings of paranoia, neuroticism and, ultimately, hatred.
While on their travels some Europeans will eventually begin to consciously acknowledge that they are regarded as superior, for they will be bombarded by the veneration of the Aryan aesthetic on every leg of their journey. Unfortunately, due almost exclusively to Marxist indoctrination back home, few–if any—Europeans will ever take their racial awareness any further. They will never begin to consider that they might in fact be superior, but will actually try to rationalise the behaviour of the locals by taking the blame on their “inherently racist, entitled and privileged” selves. After all, do the Western media not dictate to the world what is beautiful and what isn’t? Such will be their self-destructive line of reasoning after decades of relentless Marxist propaganda.
So the next time we find ourselves in the minority and the center of attention while travelling, let us imagine that we are the center of attention for all the wrong reasons: ugliness, failure, poverty, ineptitude and savagery. The stares will quickly begin to seem more like scowls, the paranoia and neuroticism will set in, and in a silent frenzy we will start to look for more of our own kind, so that we can rage against this seemingly impenetrable alien society surrounding us that we envy and despise all at once.
http://www.menamongtheruins.com/?p=236
such a pity. her french films suck, her american films? almost no career