There are a lot of reasons to be optimistic, but let’s face it: We might lose. Western Civilization might be undermined by Jews, overwhelmed by Muslims, and betrayed by our own Judas Goat elites. We might just keep digging our graves until the hole caves in on us. We might be past the tipping point, already. We might, as John Derbyshire suggests, be doomed
But even if we fail, we could still warn future civilizations. We could put together some message, like NASA’s ARECIBO Message to alien life, that could serve as a simple and universal caution sign. This would need to be a pictogram, a collection of symbols that could be understood by some future race with an entirely different language, alphabet, history, and culture. I’ve gone ahead and designed something that will strike fear into the hearts and minds of any and all healthy civilizations, for all time…
1. Bikinis – Shameless public nudity; sexuality desacralized and commoditized
2. Boots with the Fur – Third world cultural influence; Seasonally inappropriate footwear
3. Peace Sign – Pacifism; Failure to fight back; Symbol originally standing for victory inverted to stand for failure and defeat
4. Good People doing Nothing – Millions in Western Civilization see the decadence and treason but stand around looking stupid
5. Eiffel Tower – Epic monuments erected by forefathers to celebrate technological progress are used as ironic backdrops for acting like whores
6. Burkas – Angry Muslim foreigners invade Paris, chronically terrorize the French citizenry, and murder women who act like whores. French citizens react by protesting in support of their attackers while acting like whores.
Wow, someone have a bad day?
I’m not *actually* angry. I just wanted to share the funny picture.
Where did you find this?
I link to the source at the bottom of the post.
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/03/31/bikini-protest-of-fr.html
Oh … they were protesting the burqa ban. I thought they were just goofing off.
To respond to one of your points.
We are doomed. I don’t think there is anyway to reverse the trend. The die has already been cast and it must run its course. I think it is really similar to this story about the rat explosion in Asia : http://www.gfa.org/news/articles/rats-causing-famine-in-myanmar/
The infestation has gotten so bad that the Granddaughter rats are reaching reproductive age while the Mama rat is STILL producing. At some point there will not be enough resources to feed the massive population. What the farmers there have to do is try to predict when that population explosion is going to take place and plant/harvest according to the event.
Results of the 2010 census will likely realize long held fears. And you know pressure will be on that department to produce results asap. I would love to see some predictions about census results and effects it will have on the political, social, economical aspects in this country. What if? What if Whites made up less than 50%?
They symbol hijacked the burka. Vive la France!
I tend toward a pessimistic view of our chances of securing a future for white people. I daily come in contact with so many rotten white people (dubious character, anti-racist, no racial conscious) that it almost seems there’s more bad than good. GL Rockwell was correct when he said the white race was in need of pruning.
I’m not religious but it will require a miracle to turn this thing around. In case you haven’t noticed time is not on our side.
French sluts are the only sluts who decided to combine the deindividuation of the Burkha with the dehumanization of the Bikini.
It’s the worst of both Worlds…
NO to thinking of me as a Human Being with individuality and emotions I express with my face.
But YES to thinking of me as something you can look at to get an erection.
All I see is a picture of three very stupid-looking French women.
All of that pales in comparison to John Derbyshire who has doomed his lineage by committing the ultimate racial sin. Indeed we are doomed if we follow his example.
http://www.johnderbyshire.com/FamilyAlbum/Marriage/page.html
1. Bikinis – Shameless public nudity; sexuality desacralized and commoditized
They should have been nude, in true European style. The nude white female is the ultimate standard of beauty, and at the risk of sounding pagan, the divine.
2. Boots with the Fur – Third world cultural influence; Seasonally inappropriate footwear
Vikings wore fur
3. Peace Sign – Pacifism; Failure to fight back; Symbol originally standing for victory inverted to stand for failure and defeat
Charles Lindbergh – radical anti-war activist who tried to keep us out of WWI, which would have kept us out of WWII.
4. Good People doing Nothing – Millions in Western Civilization see the decadence and treason but stand around looking stupid
French men admiring French women, what else could be expected?
5. Eiffel Tower – Epic monuments erected by forefathers to celebrate technological progress are used as ironic backdrops for acting like whores.
Calling a woman a whore is a prima facie civil case in the US, and will result in a fine unless you can prove she accepted money for sex.
6. Burkas – Angry Muslim foreigners invade Paris, chronically terrorize the French citizenry, and murder women who act like whores. French citizens react by protesting in support of their attackers while acting like whores.
Hot French Chicks in Bikinis subvert Muslim symbols and show the cowardice of French men who won’t defend their borders.
“Calling a woman a whore is a prima facie civil case in the US, and will result in a fine unless you can prove she accepted money for sex.”
Matt said “acting like Whores”.
The thing is this is part of a pattern of Western Women responding to Muslims by stupidly baring their flesh, as if it somehow hurts Muslim Men to have their preconceptions about how out of control and slutty Western Women are confirmed.
http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2006/11/28/bikini_march/index.html
“somehow hurts Muslim Men to have their preconceptions about how out of control and slutty Western Women are confirmed.”
who gives a shit what they think?
Wait – why are they in France anyway?
What those protesters in Australia were saying was that the thing they really value about the West is that it has relatively loose standards of feminine modesty.
But the thing is that this loose standards of feminine modesty are intimately related to the West’s loose standards of sexual morality.
And it’s these loose standards of sexual morality that has made the White Birthrate so low that it has allowed Muslims to take over major Western Cities, and to rape significant numbers of White Women.
To White Female Sexual Immodesty: the cause of, and solution to, all life’s problems!
Except it isn’t a solution to anything at all.
Stupid, stupid girls.
“who gives a shit what they think?”
Evidently the girls in the Photograph do! Otherwise, what’s up with the Burkha Face Coverings?
“Wait – why are they in France anyway?”
Because White Men have been too emasculated by Female Sexual Empowerment to do anything to stop the Muslims from invading their Country.
Mark – post 12 – Thank you.
We female White Nationalists have the same reaction to that sort of Yellow Fever scenario, that you WN fellows have to Mud Sharks.
This creates a desire for the taste of blood, in the mouth…..
“what’s up with the Burkha Face Coverings?”
You don’t get it. French women are basically mocking French cowardice.
If French men got together and dealt with the Muslim problem, what would the French women do?
They would pose in bikinis for the victorious French men.
You don’t have to be some sleaze like Roissy to see this. I read the Dutch make the Muslims watch documentaries showing all the women at the beach topless to gauge their level of fanaticism. While it’s a long way from keeping Muslim immigrants out of Europe it may be a start.
I find it odd that conservative’s solution to a problem like this is to demand more modesty from their women – in other words, act like Muslims – instead of expelling the alien men from areas with access to their women.
The men are too weak to protect the women, so they blame them for foreign male attention by calling them “sluts” for keeping European behavior norms in the face of foreign male threats.
Roissy would call it “beta male” and Nietzsche would call it slave morality.
“Because White Men have been too emasculated by Female Sexual Empowerment to do anything to stop the Muslims from invading their Country.”
The Devil Made Me Do It.
Mark @ #12
I agree with you. The Derb has committed the ultimate racial sin. Derbyshire delves deep into his ancestry, as if he is proud of his european heritage, but his children look nothing like him or any of his ancestors. His kids both look asian (and I guess for all practical purposes, they are). How would he explain this to the people in his genetic past? They would be appalled – as I am. How can he hold the views he professes and yet sell out his once beautiful DNA heritage? I am baffled.
“You don’t get it. French women are basically mocking French cowardice.
If French men got together and dealt with the Muslim problem, what would the French women do?
They would pose in bikinis for the victorious French men.”
I don’t blame myself for not getting it.
That’s pretty esoteric, man…
I wonder if anyone got it except for you?
“I find it odd that conservative’s solution to a problem like this is to demand more modesty from their women – in other words, act like Muslims…”
I’m not saying it’s the solution that more modesty of itself would solve the problem.
Instead I’m saying the whole idea that less modesty has a role to play in solving the problem is crazy, and evidence that these France Women are a bunch of Neocons who think Western Civilization is just the freedom to do stuff you can’t do in the Islamic World.
It’s like when Janis Joplin sang “Freedoms just another word for nothing left to lose.”
No it isn’t Janis, you stupid slut.
And the West is more than the recent custom of letting White Women run wild without the slightest male interference.
“The men are too weak to protect the women, so they blame them for foreign male attention by calling them ‘sluts’ for keeping European behavior norms in the face of foreign male threats.”
I never said they were to blame for foreign male attention. My point is that White Female sluthood weakens resistance to foreign takeover, by lowering the birthrate and sending White Men the message that they don’t really run society anymore.
Really, if these White Women are so great and brave, why don’t they do something to stop Muslims from taking over France?
It’s clear from how they can do whatever they want with impunity, and without the slightest concern for the effect it might have on anyone else, that THEY are the ones who really run society, and who have the responsibility of defending it from invasion.
“… sexuality … commoditized” Why was the photo taken? Is it part of an advertisement to sell vodka or Japanese cars to Frenchmen?
Don’t care, am going down (metaphorically) fighting:
“Our duty is to hold on to the lost position, without hope, without rescue, like that Roman soldier whose bones were found in front of a door in Pompeii, who, during the eruption of Vesuvius, died at his post because they forgot to relieve him. That is greatness. That is what it means to be a thoroughbred. The honorable end is the one thing that can not be taken from a man.” — Oswald Spengler
When it comes to leaving something for future Civilizations (Asian?) be sure to put in lots of Stars of David to warn them about the Jews!
(sorry for double post)
Seriously though, what is wrong with bikinis? Why harsh the mellow, dude?
In Pagan times White Women would sometimes even wear less!
It is just that summer is around the corner and one thing a healthy red-blooded White Male can look forward too is a trip to the beach and the possibility of seeing beautiful White Women in this attire! (and a chance for Alpha Males amongst us to use game in this enviroment: http://www.toqonline.com/2010/01/guide-to-game/ I fully support Alpha Males! Live the life I wish I could guys! )
I’m not familiar with John Derbyshire’s pronouncement that whites are doomed, but he is wrong. Even within invaded USA, we’re still a big majority, with new increasing birthrates after decades of decline when our females had sought “exciting” careers, not motherhood.
Now most know the “excitement” was bullshit!… hyped by media to get them working – not reproducing – thus also competing with men for better jobs, causing wages to stagnate, as prices and taxes rose – until, by 2010 it takes two to make what a white man used to get! Of course waves of third-world immigrants (legal and not), accustomed to “low” wages by our standards, drove this too… to the profit of corporate investors (our parents and grandparents!)
Then came RACIST LAW “affirmative action.” WHY IN THE HELL DID WHITES NOT KILL ANY WHITE PUSHING THIS AT THE START? (I was outside USA, in southern Africa, where this idiocy was damned. As an isolated nation, with a white nationalist agenda, we prospered.
But globalists like Kissinger threatened invasion unless whites just turned over their world to others – who had been given their own nations “bantustans.” No… they had to rule us = WHITE DEATH.)
Lately massive cheap goods from China etc. crushed many local US industries, leaving our folks as URBANIZED SERFS IN SERVILE JOBS…
CURSE THE SERVICE INDUSTRY ECONOMY! It’s mostly crap!
BAN MOST THIRD WORLD IMPORTS (except tropical foods and key ores etc. from white-owned operations!) Rally to ban the rest!… and hope someone out there takes harder action to end the flood of cheap industrial imports from the Third World, especially China. (If several ships from China sank, destroying a huge $ value of goods, it might restructure world trade in a flash!) Without such imports, there would be a market to restart US industries!
DEMAND CORE AMERICANS GET THE BETTER JOBS IN OUR INDUSTRY.
(Others had the chutzpah to demand they get what they wanted!)
LET”S GET OUR YOUNG WHITE FEMALES REPRODUCING BIGTIME!
ANY WHITE GIRL OVER 25 WITHOUT KIDS IS A SLACKER! TELL THEM!
“Slacker” should be more powerful words than “racist” – a word coined in Russian by idol Lev Davidovitch Bronstein (“Leon Trotsky”) to silence our people by verbal intimidation. Don’t be intimidated!
Why not wear shirts with these…
I REPUDIATE “RACIST” – a slur to kill my kinfolks!
SCREW AFFIRMATIVE ACTION – it’s genocidal to my folks! [big screw]
DUMP DIVERSITY before it dumps you! [dump truck unloading]
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS = white genocide [on white coffin]
KEEP PREGNANT…. white beauty! [hot white girl] Don’t be a slacker!
A few million people of our folks in southern Africa defied the myth of “majorities,” by separating them into their own (subordinate) states – which now should be done worldwide – and deporting border-crashers, and executing terrorists. “Political correctness” was gone. I never heard that word there. Despite world sanctions, they had a thriving life! [No TV and outside propaganda for years] And it seemed to me white women had larger families than in USA!
[When Kissinger came with his “orders,” why didn’t irate folks there just executed him & Mandela, and get into full war mode at home, easier then than now! (By that time I was outside Africa.)]
TELL WHITE YOUTHS HOW SWEET LIFE CAN BE… vs “PC” crap now!
It’s true. If they have enough brains to check facts, they’ll “go white!” Tell them that if they don’t push themselves to the top, other race-conscious groups will, and make them their slaves, or dead… that is how biology and human history works. (Even Jesus Christ knows this and will liberate his kindred… it’s another story.)
Please show some of Derbyshire’s pronouncements.
Charles,
There’s a difference between someone wearing a bikini on a beach, and someone wearing a bikini on the Streets of an Urban Area.
Wearing a bikini in such a context is highly redolent of a Red Light District.
Also, there’s something perverse about Women who expose their bodies while at the same time hiding their faces.
It’s like a metaphor for the modern Western tendency to view Females in a dehumanized fashion.
I should say: “It’s like a metaphor for the modern Western tendency to view Females in so sexualized and deverbalized a manner that it becomes dehumanizing.”
The irony is that Feminists have helped to create a society where its FAR less important for a Woman to have a brain in her head, from the standpoint of attracting mates, than it was in the days of Jane Austen.
Female sexuality has been commoditized for a very long time, it’s not called the oldest profession for nothing. It’s just become so crass and vulgar now, there are no restraints. It actually does a disservice to female sexuality, as it has become abusive, perverse and grotesque.
How would he explain this to the people in his genetic past? They would be appalled – as I am. How can he hold the views he professes and yet sell out his once beautiful DNA heritage? I am baffled.
Indeed, and even the degree of miscegenation is extreme, as he is an intelligent man, well-traveled, successful, he had his pick of women, and he chose to marry and sire children with a Mongoloid. If this kind of behavior doesn’t anger you, then you are not a racialist, you are not a white nationalist.
Women like attention.
Women will do damn near anything to make people look at them.
The women who made this picture were probably not thinking much about anything except, “Whee, I like people looking at me!”
The picture may, however, have considerable propaganda value for at least one French faction.
“There’s a difference between someone wearing a bikini on a beach, and someone wearing a bikini on the Streets of an Urban Area.”
Can agree with this! Just don’t like the other side of the coin: Puritan like prudery which seemed to maybe have been advocated is all. There are certain places where wearing alluring and revealing attire is alright in my mind: the beach and various night spots (bars & clubs) being amongst them!
“There’s a difference between someone wearing a bikini on a beach, and someone wearing a bikini on the Streets of an Urban Area.”
There’s a difference between “wearing a bikini on the Streets of an Urban Area” and posing for a staged picture. It’s not as if these women were hanging around in Urban Area lounging in their bikinis – this is a staged photograph – that certainly got some attention here.
I’m not willing to call the models “sluts” for posing for this picture. At first I thought the thread was mostly just funny, and with some clever re-interpreting of the photograph. But it seemed to hit a nerve.
I guess sexy French women do that to people.
Charles,
I’m guilty of having checked them out, and I’m a hypocrite in all kinds of ways. I’m not trying to get all high ‘n mighty, here. But I do believe that the mellow must be harshed. Societies which fail to optimally channel the primary motivators toward behaviors which contribute toward a more robust society are doomed to be replaced by those that do. It’s not a coincident that we’re getting our asses handed to us by societies that discourage their women from jiggling theirs in public.
We have sports and video games to drain off male aggression. We have sluts and porn to drain off the male sex drive. There’s very little compelling our young men to apply their blood, sweat, and other bodily fluids toward civilizational advancement – and it shows.
The traditional institution of marriage is a collective bargaining agreement by women against young men. It imposes a list of demands on them, demands which keep civilization strong, before they’ll show men their tits. Girls gone wild are just like union scabs in this context, destroying the motive to support a family, and breaking the homes upon which societies are built.
“Girls gone wild are just like union scabs in this context, destroying the motive to support a family, and breaking the homes upon which societies are built.”
Agreed – and there is a simple solution – early marriage and child rearing. It’s biologically appropriate but for some reason, modern whites think that putting off children and marriage to go to college is somehow a good thing.
In the 1950’s, colleges had private apartments for married couples. Now, they have co-ed showers and bathrooms, like a locker room.
We could be helping support young white families, instead we are bailing out New York Banksters. Must be the brain slugs.
I’m not willing to call the models “sluts” for posing for this picture. At first I thought the thread was mostly just funny, and with some clever re-interpreting of the photograph. But it seemed to hit a nerve.
Agreed, it’s kind of petty and silly to call women “whores” for wearing bikinis. Sounds like a Muslim fundamentalist.
Check the priorities: Degrading white women for wearing bikinis… while praising a white man who married and had children with an Asian.
People love their bandwagon.
The traditional institution of marriage is a collective bargaining agreement by women against young men. It imposes a list of demands on them, demands which keep civilization strong, before they’ll show men their tits.
This really gets tiresome. You, George Gilder, Christian conservatives, the Roissy fanboys, and the polygamy wackos may believe this, but it is absolutely untrue.
Monogamous marriage and the regulation of female sexuality are in the interest of men. Men are the ones who have long-term sexual horizons, and it is men who insist on marriage and female chastity. When men run things, female sexuality is tightly controlled. When women run things, there is wanton promiscuity.
Try reading this book, The Garbage Generation.
http://www.fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html
“Chapter VII: The Gilder fallacy” addresses the fallacious ideas in your comment.
A quote from that chapter:
“where women run things, as in the ghettos, little attention is paid to marriage or to long-term cycles of sexuality, and instead there are so many one-night stands, so many children having children. Where men run things, as in Oriental families, the long-term cycles extend backward to ancestor worship and forward to education, careers, the family’s good name, and care for the hereditaments and the patrimony.”
“Agreed, it’s kind of petty and silly to call women ‘whores’ for wearing bikinis. Sounds like a Muslim fundamentalist.”
You say that like it’s a bad thing.
Muslim Fundamentalists have a far better sense of how a society should be organized than we do.
“Monogamous marriage and the regulation of female sexuality are in the interest of men.”
Then why are the most Patriarchal Societies in the World, like Saudi Arabia, Polygamous?
MGLS, thanks for the link. Looks like a pretty good book.
polygamy wackos?
Those “wackos” who embrace it, non-white alas, are taking over Europe. And the White ones – Mormons – who embraced it were extremely effective.
Polygamy to some degree is in the interests of both men and women and most importantly an ethnic group that is in demographic trouble.
But hey, don’t let the facts stand in the way of your opinion.
Mark,
I didn’t praise Derbyshire and I definitely didn’t praise his marriage.
MGLS,
I will follow up with the research you offered, but I’m not convinced on the surface. The urban ghetto isn’t a place where women are empowered. It’s a place where women are left to shoulder the burden of parenthood alone (with gov’t assistance) while men get to run around and do what they want. I think the distinction must be made between young men and old men as well. Elders, patriarchs, work to press young men into societally beneficial roles.
Monogamous marriage and the regulation of female sexuality are in the interest of men.
Regulating female and male sexuality is in the interest of the racialist/white nationalist. It makes little difference whether non-white admixture is patrilineal or matrilineal. The strongest patriarchies are not immune, in fact they are just as guilty.
“The traditional institution of marriage is a collective bargaining agreement by women against young men. It imposes a list of demands on them, demands which keep civilization strong, before they’ll show men their tits. Girls gone wild are just like union scabs in this context, destroying the motive to support a family, and breaking the homes upon which societies are built.”
——
‘Marry when you are old and good for nothing’
In his epic novel “War and Peace”, Leo Tolstoy warns young men to “never marry” until they’ve done all there is to do in life. He likens married men to “chained convicts” who have lost “all freedom” and whose lives consist of nothing but “drawing rooms, gossip, balls, vanity, and triviality”. A married man “knows nothing” and is “fit for nothing”, for he must devote himself to satisfying the whims of his wife, who, as a woman, is inherently “selfish, vain, stupid, trivial in everything”. So was Tolstoy also working for the Marxists and writing propaganda aimed at destroying the European family? Of course not. Tolstoy’s impassioned warning only indicates that feminism was the product of “Teutonic-Christian stupidity”, as Schopenhauer eloquently puts it in his treatise “On Women”, and not some Marxist conspiracy. Yes, the radical feminism which appeared in the 20th century was an exclusively Marxist affair, and the screech of feminism would certainly have never reached such ear-grating highs in the absence of Marxists, but then there wouldn’t have even been a screech at all if it weren’t for the foolishness of European men and their culture of romance, gallantry and woman veneration.
http://www.menamongtheruins.com/?p=344
Muslim Fundamentalists have a far better sense of how a society should be organized than we do.
Well I certainly give them credit for their appropriate reaction to modern African rap culture. That made me LOL.
Rapper Reportedly Detained For ‘Repulsive’ Dance Moves
The initial media reports today quoted a senior police official in Kish as saying that Mankan had an “indecent appearance,” and “performed repulsive and obscene [dance] moves in a shopping center in Kish.”
“Regulating female and male sexuality is in the interest of the racialist/white nationalist.”
Indeed Mark.
If you look at the History of the Roman Empire, what most strikes you about their years of decline and fall was their complete failure to regulate Male Sexuality.
Even without Feminism, and even with stern regulation on Female Sexuality for everyone except Prostitutes, this was enough to bring them down.
“The strongest patriarchies are not immune, in fact they are just as guilty.”
Well, their was a genetically tragic failure on the part of the Saudi Ultra-Patriarchy to prevent admixture between Saudi Men and Negro Slaves.
It’s probably for this reason that even today, the Saudis are a lot further away from Whites than a lot of other Middle Eastern Groups.
The John Derbyshires of the World are indeed a grave danger…
Also Consumption Slavery, so popular in the Arab World, cannot be tolerated.
Typically it’s Concubinage that leads to race mixing in a true Patriarchy.
That’s what led to Abraham race mixing with that Egyptian minx Hagar, for example
Matt Parrott I am in essential agreement with you about the role of ‘Traditional Marriage’, but would just counter that we are not living in some Golden Age right now, but are trapped in the Kali Yuga.
Lets take a look at Indo-Aryan Puranic time cycles and social cycle theory:
In his final Socio-Political tome ‘Ride the Tiger’ Baron Evola advised young men to avoid marriage, which has become a cynical shadow of its former self, and instead place their energies into preparing for the eventual Collapse of Modernist Society, whereupon Men will need to be free for political activism (and not tied down by the constraints of family) Sort of like a Political Soldier. I would just add that I think that during this time period I just don’t think it is the end of the world to go to the beach and enjoy the sights that is all.
Charles,
Decadence comes from within, I believe. Following from that, the difference between women at the beach and these girls is that the former are enjoying a day at the beach and the latter are corroding what few norms and mores we have left for political effect.
I disagree with Evola on choosing between a family and the radical life. It’s not an easy balance to strike, but I feel it must be done.