Several people have posted a request for a larger version of the map of the Boerestaat, which Kievsky posted in his recent entry on reclaiming the Boer Republics. I found an interesting video in which the late Robert van Tonder of the Boerestaat Party outlined his goals, using that map, and explains the merciless nature of demographics:
I found the video, along with several different maps, posted to this blog entry.
Robert van Tonder killed himself in 1999 after a long battle with cancer. Like Terre’Blanche, van Tonder frequently warned that violence would prevail in the absence of any other option for the Boervolk. Here’s an interesting excerpt from newspaper coverage of his death:
He made several predictions of an uprising by those supporting the restoration of the old Boer republics if their demands were not heeded.
The people would embark on the kind of revolt that had plagued Northern Ireland for decades. He never gave details on what form of resistance he had in mind.
“If one plans something like that, one does not announce it,” he said.
“The people would embark on the kind of revolt that had plagued Northern Ireland for decades.”
No they won’t, and if they did they would fail utterly.
Revolts like this begin for domestic reasons but their end is dictated by the international environment. Without French support even the American Revolution might have failed. I think it would have failed.
What is the international environment for Whites, especially Whites in South Africa? It is as toxic as possible.
If they would rise up and honestly try to sucede, I think they could do it. Black armies have never historically been able to stop fighting Whites. Furthermore, I had read in the past that the modern Negro South African military is a joke. Perhaps, a breakaway White/Boer/Even Anglo-South African faction could appeal to the Russians for help.
Even worse case senario on the foreign front, the Media demands the US militarily intervene, is nothing. The US has shown itself to be much more of a paper tiger then in the pre-Vietnam years. The US has not truly won a victory in either Iraq or Afghanistan. In the former, they massively paid off the Iraqi not to fight while having the military claim that loll in attacks was because of the “surge.” The Americans don’t have the troops to send and if they did, the Sucessionists could do serious damage or simply surrender like the Serbs. If the latter path is taken, the US military would have to end up policing the country and would actually both come to see the country’s “diversity” up close and personal and perhaps be won over (in the case of white American military personell) by the White South Africans.
Also, if civil war ever comes to SA, White Nationalists throughout the globe could form units akin to the left’s Abraham Lincoln Brigades during the Spanish Civil War, and go and fight. Honestly, if we are going to constantly worry about “the international environment” we are never going to alter ” the international environment” and survive racially.
I don’t believe the whites have a land to stand on in SA. South Africa is for Blacks, whites who’d like their own land should move to New Zealand or some other sparsely populated largely white nation.
The AWB leadership are absolute pillocks and are shouting “Independent boerestaat” yet again, but what exactly are they expecting in reply? Possibly they are thinking the United Nations will swoop to their aid and erect a wall like in china around one of the provinces and then proceed to say “Ok, all the blacks in this sector must up and leave NOW.”
Nope, this won’t work at all. The best tactical approach at this time would be to rewrite the policies of the AWB party Organization, change the insignia and symbolical emblems, reform the focus and goals and start negotiating a unification strategy with other similarly marginalized minority parties and groups. There is power in numbers in Africa, and it is always better to make allies in such times than to retract to a corner and alienate yourself from everyone else. Alienating yourself only makes you a bigger target, but reaching out a hand of friendship and expanding your member base turns an isolated incident into am intelligent step forward.
I doubt whether this will happen though, and sadly so when we look at the bloody history of our country, as epitomized in the gruesome political murder of the father of the AWB.
The AWB is done, must give up their useless struggle now. It’s time for progressive reform, fresh political strategy and a new vision for the future. With old school ideas they are only going to make a bad situation much worse… Sadly I doubt there are any leaders such as this prepared to step up to the plate and propose a modern reform, and this will inevitably lead to the ultimate extermination by slow genocide of the Afrikaners all over SA, and eventually all other whites that deem themselves superior to Afrikaans people.
My opinion : get qualified and get out… when the rats start scurrying you know the ship is going down. You’d be a fool if went back to bed for a good nights rest, and you’d be a bigger fool if you think you can have the lifeboat to yourself.
“The people would embark on the kind of revolt that had plagued Northern Ireland for decades.”
No they won’t, and if they did they would fail utterly.
—
100% right. No international support. Even the remains of the AWB do no longer talk about violence. They know they can’t win.
Even massive land seizures like in Rhodesia (within 10 years) will not change that much. Some people will leave for Orania (tiny number) and most will just leave SA.
They gave up state power and the demographic evolution is
a disaster for whites. For now, this pretty much means GAME OVER.
I don’t believe the whites have a land to stand on in SA. South Africa is for Blacks, whites who’d like their own land should move to New Zealand or some other sparsely populated largely white nation.
—
If you are going to post here, at least have the decency to capitalize (W)hite the way you do (B)lack… you hypocrite.
Landser,
My capitalization practice aren’t a slight at whites, just express the way I define Black. Nothing more nothing less. I undoubtedly find Blacks superior to whites, which is why I am here- I am happy to see whites interested in protecting their heritage and promoting the belief that they are great. Rather than letting their cultural heritage succumb to “diversity” and other silly clichéd ideologies and beliefs. Diversity diminishes us all.
Boers don’t belong in Africa at all, that is the Black man’s land, they must go back to Europe or Austrialia or New Zealand. In any event everyone would be better served with them migrating.
I think it is now possible to use this situation to promote a white homeland amongst “polite” society. Of course the Lefties and their respectable conservative henchman will spew the obvious, but we have the UN Convention on Genocide and the recent partitions in Europe to pull out and use against them.
My capitalization practice aren’t a slight at whites, just express the way I define Black. Nothing more nothing less. I undoubtedly find Blacks superior to whites, which is why I am here- I am happy to see whites interested in protecting their heritage and promoting the belief that they are great. …
—
Jamara,
With all do respect, it is a ‘slight’ against Whites, since you claim to find Blacks superior to Whites… but, its totally cool, since a lot of us do the same here in respect to our kind… and I admire your honesty and your love of your folk (especially after learning a bit more about you perusing your blog — particularly your highlighting the story of Booker T, one of the greatest Black men in history).
Does Jamara advocate that “refugee” Somalis in Maine, who came up from Atlanta in order to access the slave labor of Maine Whites through welfare, return to Africa, too?
After all, South African Whites gave over the 1st World country they built, but the Somali “refugees” in Maine are enslaving (through welfare) Whites in Maine *right now.*
Interesting that Jamara recommends SA Whites return to the *White* lands of Australia or New Zealand. He obviously feels no particular empathy for the Aborigines, only black African supremacy.
Which is fine. At least he’s honest.
@Landser. I don’t feel as if it as slight, as I capitalize Black because it is more of a cultural description than a racial one, it is the equivalent of Negro for me. When I say white I am only referring to white people.
@Barb, Your argument is a bit false. Somalis aren’t invading Maine, whether you or I like it or not by and large they migrated legally to the U.S., and as you mention provide the newly prosperous Portlanders with cheaper labor and service. They also aren’t attempting to set up governments. I am in New England too and we have also had an influx of refugee Somalis and too a lesser extent Liberians and the Sudanese.
Australia and New Zealand are majority white, unlike SA and you are correct my loyalty lies with the Blacks.
Jamara,
I glanced at your website. It is pretty clear where you are coming from. In any case, I use “White” and “negro” respectively.
Hunter,
That would be odd, colors are typically lower case while ethnic groups are capitalized. If I was speaking of Anglo Americans, Irish Americans, or German Americans, I’d capitalize them. I believe in separation not hate or mindless attacks- I feel no urge to diminish white folks.
Jamara,
You are clearly trying to diminish “white folks” by using the lower case for “white” and the upper case for “Blacks.” That’s fine. It lets us know where you are coming from. I’ve reverted to the fine Antebellum standard of using the lower case “negro” myself.
Hunter,
That is highly illogical on your part. Negro is an ethnicity thus requires capitalization, white is a color and not capitalized. But I say go your own way young man, capitalize(or don’t) as you please, though it might go against your(I’m assuming) desire to preserve Western civilization, proper usage of the English language would play a part in that.
I have no reason to diminish whites, I rather like most of them. If you’d like illogically like to believe I am diminishing whites, I suppose I’ll leave you to that. However disingenuous it is.
Jamara,
Perhaps you are unfamiliar with the history of these terms. In the nineteenth century, “negro” was almost always used in the lower case whereas “White” was used in the upper case. The capitalized “Negro” came into common use after a long campaign by W.E.B. DuBois and the NAACP in the early twentieth century to elevate the status of the negro in the American public mind. The capitalization of “African-American” and “Jew” and the deliberate use of “white” in the lower case (as well as the whole attack on “whiteness” in general) reflects the decline of the WASP elite that used to control America.
Hunter,
Thanks that was pretty interesting, I didn’t know that. But that wouldn’t change the fact that Negro is an ethnicity thus requires capitalization. Black used in the typical sense would be a lower case word just like white is, so it isn’t case of me diminishing your race just me capitalizing according to how I define Black- culturally as oppose to purely racial. When I say white I mean color when I say Black I am referring to a specific groups of cultures, experiences etc.
I don’t agree with your conclusion, in regards to the decline of the WASP elite and changes in capitalization practices. Italian American, WASP, Irish American and German American are always capitalized, so it is logical Jew and African American would be. It isn’t logical that white would be treated the same as those ethnicity’s as it is a color, they are not generally capitalized.
Hunter,
If your main point is that Jew, Black and White are each distinct “peoples,” then why don’t you capitalize both? Otherwise you get into a tit-for-tat thing that looks petty.
Jamara,
White nationalists think of white people as constituting a culturally, ethnically, and racially distinct group. Similar to the way you see blacks. Thus it is appropriate for them to capitalize “White.” Those who write “black” or “negro” or “jew” lowercased do it to highlight their negative feelings towards these groups, or to “balance out” anti-white double standards they’ve noticed elsewhere, as far as I can tell.
I would capitalize “white” and “black” myself except for the fact that this isn’t considered gramatically correct. As you probably know, for whatever reason, the following are considered officially correct:
“white,” “black,” “Jew,” “Hispanic,” “Asian,” “European,” and so forth.
Crypto Arayan. Good post and I agree with it. I just wanted to point out to everyone I’m not diminishing Whites when I don’t capitalize it. I’d just as well stay off your site before I do that, as I find it completely vulgar to invade people’s “home” for the sake of offending them or attacking their beliefs. In my future posts here, I have no problem capitalizing White, if the people here define it the manner in which you say.
Jamara,
“White Americans” are the oldest ethnic group extant in the United States.
Hunter,
WASP’s are the oldest Americans, though Black Americans and Dutch Americans can lay claim to that also. Many Whites like Italian Americans and Greek Americans came much later. America was founded by people with largely British values, it wasn’t really a Pan White(Euro) event.
If I may? How do WNs approach that? Is every group of Whites, even those who historically competed against each other, considered apart of White America?