Mark,
I didn’t advocate assimilating Semites. I just received the most despicable death-threat laden tirade this morning for my advocacy work. I know you think you’re accomplishing something with your lies and your attacks
Are you really trying to play the sympathy card, Matt? While at the same time disrespecting me and calling me a liar, in addition to all of your past insults. Talk about chutzpah. “The Jew cries out as he strikes you.”
You’re the liar, you’ve made comments about assimilating Jews and consider Jews as White, one in this very thread that I quoted. Not to mention your past philo-Semitic background. Your problem is being held accountable and flip-flopping.
that you’re doing the important work of badgering people out of the movement who aren’t up to your standards of Nordic chauvinism. But please drop it. At least for a couple days.
I direct you to the name of this blog: Occidental Dissent. If you can’t stand for anyone to disagree with you then you’re going to have a very hard time with political activism.
Let me remind you again that I supported you from the beginning, but it was you that took a negative tone with me. If you don’t want me to address you directly then I won’t.
I recall reading a comment thread at Chronicles (one of only a handful I ever read) that featured paleocons (1) falling all over themselves to say they aren’t racist, while (2) indicating they would only marry and prefer their children marry other Northwestern Europeans.
I think this is more or less the attitude of most tradition-minded Americans. You are not going to win them over by telling them they are bad people for looking askance at the idea of their daughters marrying Italians.
Indeed, and even American non-Whites recognize the difference between Northern and Southern Europeans. They view Whites as those of Nordish descent. They often wrongfully try to co-opt Southern Euros and Middle Easterners.
“Indeed, and even American non-Whites recognize the difference between Northern and Southern Europeans.”
There is a North/South genetic cline in Western Europe, not surprising they’d notice it.
“They view Whites as those of Nordish descent.”
That’s crazy talk. For just one thing, it follows from this statement that Non-Whites think Russians are Non-White.
“They often wrongfully try to co-opt Southern Euros and Middle Easterners.”
Middle Easterners are White according to you?
I’m surprised you’d say that.
“It was one of the biggest mistakes Latin Whites ever made, as it led to the loss of possibly the single most valuable thing we ever created or had.”
Not exactly sure what this means. I’m not that knowledgeable about Roman history. What did the Romans do to Germanics besides try to conquer them? And how was this one of the biggest mistakes Latins ever made?
N/A,
I didn’t say that Nordish Nationalists are bad people for looking askance at assimilating Meds. I said that the rift is deep enough that there will eventually need to be two parallel movements. I’m not being disrespectful toward Nordish Nationalists.
Mark,
I am not Jewish. I don’t have Jewish heritage or affiliation of any kind. I didn’t advocate for assimilating Jews in this thread. I said that WN Jews are to be regarded as a separate nation, a parallel movement. I declared it “vexing” what to do with those who have Jewish ancestry. That’s far from advocating for assimilating Jews.
I didn’t demand that you stop it or try to get your posts deleted. I asked you to stop attacking me. I didn’t start “this” and “this” is all I’m asking you to drop. I’m not asking you to stop debating. But you’re not debating, you’re attacking me. You’re saying that I’m a philo-Semite when I’m not. Now you’re implying strongly that I’m a Jew when I’m not.
As for the lying. I ask third parties to read my posts and decide for themselves if I’m advocating for assimilating Jews.
I can stand for people to disagree with me, but you consistently do more than disagree with me. You make it personal. This is exhausting for me. And, yes, it probably doesn’t bode well for my activism.
103Reginald
“They view Whites as those of Nordish descent.”
That’s crazy talk. For just one thing, it follows from this statement that Non-Whites think Russians are Non-White.
Part of the Russian population is Nordish.
“They often wrongfully try to co-opt Southern Euros and Middle Easterners.”
Middle Easterners are White according to you?
I’m surprised you’d say that.
Straw man. I never said Middle Easterners are White, but they are Caucasoid.
Afrocentric blacks often claim ancient Egyptians and Hebrews were black, and those from the Middle East and Southern Europe are part black.
A lot of Latinos think Spain is populated by mestizos like them.
104Matt Parrott
I didn’t advocate for assimilating Jews in this thread. I said that WN Jews are to be regarded as a separate nation, a parallel movement.
You said “endogamous” Jews are to be regarded as separate.
59Matt Parrott
We (White American Nationalists) have no more or less in common with Nordish American Nationalists than we do with any other White identity movement in Europe, South Africa, or anywhere else. We definitely need to work with alongside them in the struggles to come, just like we need to work with BNP, Jobik, and Boers.
In fact, I think this is the relationship we should insist on having with WN Jews. We ought not make enemies of them or bicker with them about whether they’re White or not.
But as long as they’re endogamous Jews, they can’t claim to be the same nationality. Period. By definition (perhaps not a universal definition), a nation is generally endogamous.
What to do with people who have Jewish ancestry but identify exclusively as White Americans and appear indistinguishably White? To my mind, that’s the only truly vexing question in all this.
1. According to Matt, WNs have no more or less in common with WN Jews than Nordish American nationalists or European White nationalists and we need to work alongside WN Jews.
2. According to Matt, we shouldn’t question whether Jews are White or not, we accept them as White as long as they’re WN and are not endogamous. Not endogamous implies they will mix with Whites.
3. It’s vexing to Matt what to do with mischlings who look White. This is an appeal of assimilation, otherwise why is it a concern?
4. Considering Jews as White fits in with your former allegiance to AmRen and your current association with CoCC. (Not that I have anything against those groups, just some disagreements such as the inclusion of Jews as White.)
I’m not saying you’re philo-Semitic now, I said you were previously. I think you are anti-Jewish behavior, rather than against Jews as a race.
I’m not calling you a Jew, but that proverb was applicable to your comment.
You keep saying I’m attacking you, what attacks? I disagree with certain aspects of your ideology.
I am not trying to badger you out of WN as you claim or cause you to go into a depression. If you want I will not address you directly.
There are a lot of WNs who don’t mind assimilating Jews who ideologically agree with us, so you’re not alone. The mainstream thinks Jews are White.
Mark,
I take back what I said about you lying. It’s apparent now that your principle objection was based on a misunderstanding.
1. According to Matt, WNs have no more or less in common with WN Jews than Nordish American nationalists or European White nationalists and we need to work alongside WN Jews.
Strategically, we don’t. They wish to carve off an endogamous sub-racial tribe from the USA, while we wish to carve off the entirety of White America from the USA. At some point during the development of the movement, these goals will become irreconcilable. All I’m saying is that we should recognize that and attempt to broker the most amicable result possible: which is separate allied movements.
2. According to Matt, we shouldn’t question whether Jews are White or not, we accept them as White as long as they’re WN and are not endogamous. Not endogamous implies they will mix with Whites.
Read more closely. I consistently assert that endogamy = ethnicity = nationality = movement. My conclusions follow from that. As I explained, the only twist to all this is that it doesn’t explain what to do with people with Jewish ancestry who identify as White Americans rather than as Jews. Even here, I stop short of “advocating” for this minority within a minority within a minority to be assimilated.
I didn’t advocate for Jews mixing with White Americans at all.
3. It’s vexing to Matt what to do with mischlings who look White. This is an appeal of assimilation, otherwise why is it a concern?
It’s not an appeal of assimilation. It’s an admission that my formula doesn’t really explain how to deal with those cases. That’s contingent upon the resolution of the “Are Jews White?” question.
“Part of the Russian population is Nordish.”
Part of the Italian population is Nordish as well, according to you.
Therefore if Non-Whites view the Russians as Nordish based on part of their population being Nordish, they should view the Italians as Nordish as well.
And if they view Italians as Nordish, your argument goes out the window.
“Straw man. I never said Middle Easterners are White, but they are Caucasoid.
Afrocentric blacks often claim ancient Egyptians and Hebrews were black, and those from the Middle East and Southern Europe are part black.
A lot of Latinos think Spain is populated by mestizos like them.”
Okay. But probably they do this out of a political motive. If the majority of American Whites weren’t Northern European, they wouldn’t feel the urge to try and isolate Northern European Whites from other Europe derived populations.
It’s a divide and conquer strategy.
Landser,
Why are you so obsessed with perceived slights against “Eye-talians” if you’re German?
Wanting to preserve my group and refusing to water down my identity to spare the feelings of overly-sensitive minority members does not make me a bigot.
Reginald,
“Cavalli-Sforza picked the markers he did for the reason that they were known to be selectionally neutral.”
Nope. He simply used the data that was avaiblae in the medical literature. Blood groups and immune antigens are far from selectively neutral.
For our purproses, SNP microarray data is superior in every way to the data Cavalli-Sforza relied on.
“so obvious as the interest Nordic preservationists would have in sexually disempowering French descended Men”
This is not obvious at all. From the standpoint of racial preservation, if the genes of French men are a problem, so are the genes of French women. Likewise, if French women are acceptable, so are French men.
We have an interest in securing territory to ensure longterm racial survival. We don’t have an interest in trying to maximize short term population size by breeding with racially unacceptable women.
“You think you could’ve done better?”
I’m still breathing. GLR met an untimely demise at the hands of pan-Aryan former party member “John Patler”. Here’s how William Pierce remembers Patler:
“The guy in charge of the print shop–and remember this name
–was John Patler. While I was around there, I had a chance to observe
Patler. His real name was Yanacki Patsalos. He was this dark, greasy-looking
little guy from New York, and he felt bad he was Greek instead of
Swedish or German. It really bugged him. He tried to disguise his origin
by changing his name. He had this feeling of inferiority, and he had an
envy and hatred for people with light eyes, hair, and complexion. I don’t
know exactly where this came from. Maybe it was because he had grown
up in New York and he was from a poor immigrant family and was at the
bottom of the pecking order, and at the top around where he was from
were the English, Irish, and Germans. Anyway, he was organizing the
darker members of the party against what he called the blue-eyed devils.
He was a very aggressive little turd. It was wild, surreal. . . .”
“I never said anything about personal preferences. Obviously if someone is X they have the right to be against their daughters having sex with anything other than X, if they so desire.”
In that respect, you’re more sensible than Matt.
“They just have to also be against their sons having sex with anything other than X.”
I’m sure you’ll be lecturing Italians and Greeks about that any time now.
Charlemagne,
“Eh, don’t worry, I am sure many Italian fathers would as well look askance to you looking to marry one of their daughters.”
Exactly. And it doesn’t bother me. I have no interest in Italian women. My self-esteem is not negatively impacted because some Italian or Greek would not want me marrying his daughter. Nor am I going to threaten to change my political views because of it.
Matt,
You’re welcome to refuse to work with whoever you want. But don’t try to tell us what to call ourselves.
Why are you so obsessed with perceived slights against “Eye-talians” if you’re German?
Wanting to preserve my group and refusing to water down my identity to spare the feelings of overly-sensitive minority members does not make me a bigot.
n/a,
I admit that I am somewhat partial to Italians – many that I have come across have been excellent, good family people (as well, I met a lot of Italians among the pro-White advocacy movement).
I stand by my original comment to you, that I feel you are being gratuitous in your unwarrented criticism of them, and Meds in general, especially since they are a small percentage of the American population, and more especially since most of them have assimilated into the Anglo Northern-European mainstream of White America.
Additionally, most of my political heroes – like Tom Tancredo, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and Congressman Jim Traficant just happen to be Italian Americans.
As well, n/a, I am sure that you are aware that even Richard McCulloch now agrees that all White Gentile Europeans, ‘Med’ or otherwise, should be welcomed into a potential future White ethnostate, arguing that myopically focusing on the small numbers of Italians and Greeks in America would be unecessarily quixotic, and counterproductive, especially since so many of them are significantly mixed with the NWEuro Majority members of White America.
Even Wilmot Robertson said as much, and that a few generations of mixture would nearly fully assimilate America’s southern European population.
Again, its 2010, not 1910.
“This is not obvious at all. From the standpoint of racial preservation, if the genes of French men are a problem, so are the genes of French women.”
You’re missing the fact that a few generations of Race Mixing between Nordics and French Women would bleed the Southern European Blood out of the French.
In contrast, if French Men were also allowed to Race Mix with Nordics the total amount of Southern European Blood in the Nordish Ethnostate would remain stable.
Quite possibly this stable level would be higher than you would like or prefer, or even be willing to tolerate, given your very low opinion of Southern Europeans.
“Likewise, if French women are acceptable, so are French men.”
Not if you take the long term view, as I explain above.
“I’m still breathing.”
I meant politically. Rockwell accomplished a lot more than any Nordicist has.
I doubt they’d be much or any WN movement in America today if it wasn’t for Rockwell.
“I’m sure you’ll be lecturing Italians and Greeks about that any time now.”
Italians and Greeks haven’t threatened to legally cut the core Nordic groups off from the intermediate subracial groups, while maintaining their access to those groups.
Italians and Greeks haven’t talked about taking money from Nordic taxpayers and using it to pay Nordics to have genetically Italian and Greek children.
“We don’t have an interest in trying to maximize short term population size by breeding with racially unacceptable women.”
That’s good.
Stay away from the French! They speak a language from the Ancient Romans, and they’re genetically closer to Iberians than to Swedes.
“The guy in charge of the print shop–and remember this name
–was John Patler. While I was around there, I had a chance to observe
Patler. His real name was Yanacki Patsalos. He was this dark, greasy-looking
little guy from New York, and he felt bad he was Greek instead of
Swedish or German. It really bugged him. He tried to disguise his origin
by changing his name. He had this feeling of inferiority, and he had an
envy and hatred for people with light eyes, hair, and complexion. I don’t
know exactly where this came from. Maybe it was because he had grown
up in New York and he was from a poor immigrant family and was at the
bottom of the pecking order, and at the top around where he was from
were the English, Irish, and Germans. Anyway, he was organizing the
darker members of the party against what he called the blue-eyed devils.
He was a very aggressive little turd. It was wild, surreal. . . .”
n/a,
Even though you are quoting Pierce, with all due respect, besides this being an old story, this is a rather crude and vulgar example to use in the context of this conversation.
This type of story, even if overall accurate, is certainly atypical of many normal, mainstream Greek Americans that live in the US. Not all, or even most Greeks, are ‘dark, greasy-looking little guys’ – nor do all, or even most North-Euros look like Vikings. This is a gratuitous and uncalled for stereotype.
It also seems to betray a certain personal problem or hangup on your part to even cite it – considering how hurtful and humiliating it seems intended to be. Not very objective, either.
I’m still breathing. GLR met an untimely demise at the hands of pan-Aryan former party member “John Patler”. Here’s how William Pierce remembers Patler: – n/a
—
n/a,
I wish to apologize to you for reading, and citing, your quote in my last comment out-of-context.
I did not fully read the content in which you were relating the ‘Patler’ story – how indeed he was motivated by, very likely, ethnic malice toward GLR in behaving and ultimately betraying him how he did, and ultimately the greater cause he putatively served.
Although I do not think that this is the ethnic or cultural norm for most of America’s southern European or Med minority, I do not as well think that was the point that you were trying to make. Additionally, it was wrong on my part alleging bigotry on your motives in your overall commentary.
So again, my sincere apologies.
113Landser
As well, n/a, I am sure that you are aware that even Richard McCulloch now agrees that all White Gentile Europeans, ‘Med’ or otherwise, should be welcomed into a potential future White ethnostate
LOL, when did he write that? McCulloch has renounced all of his work and joined the Pan-Aryan Front, eh?
Even Wilmot Robertson said as much, and that a few generations of mixture would nearly fully assimilate America’s southern European population.
Again, its 2010, not 1910.
And what makes you think Southern Europeans want to be assimilated? Many of them are proud of their heritage.
For a German you sure take this personally, you argue as if you’re a Mediterranean.
All the good Germans I’ve known support Nordish preservation.
Richard McCulloch still supports the goal of Nordish preservation.
He recently augmented his partition map, which was written for a TOQ essay, in order to bring it in line with the wider goals of TOQ; however, he has not changed his opinion on the need to preserve the uniqueness of what he dubs “The Nordish Race,” which is the work to which he has devoted his life.
Richard’s piece on The Nordish Race at RacialCompact.com was updated about two months ago, and I exchanged an e-mail with him on Nordish preservation just this morning (04/20/2010).
And what makes you think Southern Europeans want to be assimilated? Many of them are proud of their heritage.
For a German you sure take this personally, you argue as if you’re a Mediterranean.
All the good Germans I’ve known support Nordish preservation.
Mark,
Thanks for the compliment, regarding ‘arguing like a Mediterranean’ (lol), means I must convey some passion in how I speak. ;}
Well, at any rate, I do not fully agree with everything regarding Nordishness — although I fully agree with protecting Northern European and Northern European American culture. Too much of the ‘Nordish theory’ is just that, and is, at times, more rationalizing than rational.
It’s just that, like I said so many times, many of America’s White Meds, such as the Italians, have largely been assimilated, and it is, imho, sorely counterproductive in alienating them from our far more important goal of securing a non-Jewish dominated White ethnostate.
Additionally like I said, I have known a lot of Italian people and friends over the years (“not that there is anything wrong with that” lol) and they or most Italian AMericans that I have met do not fit your typical talmudvision stereotypes, and all consider themselves full members of not only America, but White America as well.
This is the problem with being so darn insular in America today – almost no one travels, and, even besides that, no one really gets to know eachother on an individual, personal basis – so they rely on stereotypes from the media, or reading, anachronistically, too many 100 year old books and forming their opinion based on that.
Especially as a Southerner, Mark, you should be keenly aware of this prejudice directed against you and your region.
So, this is why I feel the way that I do. I am pro-White, first and foremost, and I stick up for good people whoever they are, and whenever they get unfairly maligned, whether they are Nord, Med, or Southerner.
Richard McCulloch still supports the goal of Nordish preservation.
He recently augmented his partition map, which was written for a TOQ essay, in order to bring it in line with the wider goals of TOQ; however, he has not changed his opinion on the need to preserve the uniqueness of what he dubs “The Nordish Race,” which is the work to which he has devoted his life. – Robert
—
Robert,
Yes, here is some of Mr. McCulloch’s quotes on the matter — of which I find eminantly reasonable –
The revision now basically includes all Gentile Europeans in the same country, instead of proposing separation from the more hard-core distinct Mediterranean types that make up much of the population of southern Europe. This makes my proposal consistent with the “official” TOQ definition of our racial “in-group” although at a racial cost to the northern European racial identity of the country. Still, it has reached the point where it now seems totally unrealistic, even quixotic, to try to separate the hard-core Mediterranean elements in the US population from other Europeans, as so many of them are now largely assimilated, and even more difficult to draw some line between assimilable and unassimilable elements in the Italian-American, Greek-American or Spanish-American populations. Of course, in Europe itself we still could and should encourage the preservation of the different racial groups in their own historic nations, even perhaps northern Italians as distinct from southern Italians, but in the European-American population it now seems that the political cost of promoting such an effort would exceed the racial benefit.
…
…Significantly, this creates a de facto multiracial country in my plan, consisting of a racially-regionally defined group of non-European Caucasians (including Jews with few exceptions) along with a diverse group of Europeans mated to non-Europeans and their mixed offspring, and those who have adopted non-European children, as well as those European family members who choose not to be separated from their race-mixing and racially-mixed relatives. But, for Europeans, inclusion in this multiracial state would require an actual act of producing non-European offspring, either naturally by intermixture or by adoption, either by oneself or a close family member, and not simply a general choice or preference for a multiracial state. Perhaps a little poetic justice here for the Jews, who have been the great promoters of multiracialism and diversity, the environment they have always sought to create as beneficial to them and their interests.
I’ve been dragging my feet on this revision, largely because of the drawn-old process of rethinking some concepts, to whatever limited degree, as well as new ones. I’m being careful about it as it is a matter I take seriously. But I think I’m fairly well settled now on what I want to do. I’ll let you know when the new revised map is up.
This is the problem with being so darn insular in America today – almost no one travels, and, even besides that, no one really gets to know eachother on an individual, personal basis – so they rely on stereotypes from the media, or reading, anachronistically, too many 100 year old books and forming their opinion based on that.
I don’t dislike Italians or have a grudge against them, it is not personal for me. For some reason people keep jumping to conclusions with no basis whatsoever. I like Scarface and Goodfellas as much as the next guy. This is not a value judgment. It’s about subracial preservation and honoring who created the country.
I’m curious about some of McCulloch’s decisions. If America is to cede a good portion of its country to non-Whites, many of whom are recent immigrants, does he advocate the same for all White nations? I find this to be ridiculous for European nations especially. Instead of Whites bordering Whites, we’ll have pockets of the third world everywhere.
The reason McCulloch changed his mind:
This makes my proposal consistent with the “official” TOQ definition of our racial “in-group” although at a racial cost to the northern European racial identity of the country.
1. A European racial grouping consisting of the European-American population (i.e., those Americans of European racial type and ancestry) and centered around the Northern European or Nordish-American population as its founding, racially defining and predominant core element.
He hasn’t changed this though, which I think still infuriates some people. It’s like: “Okay, darnit, we’ll assimilate you, but you must then become Nordicist yourself!”
It would also include those persons of mixed European and non-European ancestry whose European ancestry is predominant, whose non-European ancestry is not physically obvious, whose physical phenotype or appearance is within the normal European range (i.e., who are of European racial type), who are socially recognized and identified as European, and who are assimilated into, and personally identify themselves with, the European-American population.
Well, self-identification isn’t really that good of a standard. This is a bit curious, because I wonder how much non-White ancestry he finds acceptable. Robert, do you know what his standards are regarding this?
I don’t dislike Italians or have a grudge against them, it is not personal for me. For some reason people keep jumping to conclusions with no basis whatsoever. I like Scarface and Goodfellas as much as the next guy.
Mark,
There you go again confirming my “knowing’ people through what I saw on Talmudvision” hypothesis.
This is a stereotype that many normal Italian-Americans find somewhat distasteful.
This would be like saying that someone doesn’t dislike Southerners or have a gridge against them cause “they like ‘Gone with the Wind’, or ‘Deliverance’ just as much as the next guy”.
C’mon man – we have to battle unfair stereotypes against any and all Whites.
‘gridge’ = should read ‘grudge’
Landser, it was a joke, lighten up a bit you’ll live longer.
My position has nothing whatsoever to do with stereotypes or behavior as I said before. You seem unable to grasp that. It’s like when White nationalists are interviewed by the MSM and they repetitively ask inane questions like “So why do you hate Jews and blacks so much?”
It’s apparent now that your principle objection was based on a misunderstanding.
Right… I’m misunderstanding you, you say. When you say (a) what you really mean is (b), (c) or (d). Blagojevich eat your heart out.
So when you said Jews are just smart White people who are managerial, did you not really mean they’re White?
Landser, it was a joke, lighten up a bit you’ll live longer.
Point taken 😉
I’m curious about some of McCulloch’s decisions. If America is to cede a good portion of its country to non-Whites, many of whom are recent immigrants, does he advocate the same for all White nations? I find this to be ridiculous for European nations especially. Instead of Whites bordering Whites, we’ll have pockets of the third world everywhere.
No, he does not advocate ceding parts of Europe. He says non-European racial elements in Europe would repatriate to their ancestral homelands or, if that is not possible, they would join other members of their race in the appropriate state in North America.
From “The Racial Golden Rule”:
The Nordish race cannot be expected to surrender parts of its ancient homelands to other races. The restoration of Nordish racial separation and independence in those countries would therefore require that the alien races return to their native racial homelands, whether in Africa, Asia or elsewhere. If the British could leave India the Indians can leave Britain. If the Dutch could leave Indonesia the Indonesians can leave the Netherlands. If the French could leave Algeria the Algerians can leave France. If the Europeans could leave Africa and Asia the Africans and Asians can leave Europe. They must leave, or violate the Racial Golden Rule of live and let live, and deny the Nordish race in Europe the conditions it needs for continued life.
The Nordish race can be expected to surrender extensive territories of its much larger new homeland in North America to other races. Indeed, considering the large size of the non-Nordish population in North America, and its long period of residence there (proportionately much larger and longer than the non-Nordish populations in the Nordish European homelands), no other means of achieving racial separation and independence would be consistent with the Racial Golden Rule. Each major racial group in the United States and Canada would be allotted its own exclusive territory for its own separate country and sovereign nationhood. Of the possible solutions to the American racial dilemma that would restore the conditions the Nordish race requires for continued life, this would be the most just and fair.
From “Racial Partition for Racial Preservation”:
All of the independent non-European nations resulting from the racial partition would be situated along the southern periphery of the United States. As the southern periphery already borders a non-European country and region (Mexico and the Caribbean) this would minimize the length of borders between the European and non-European races. None of the territory allotted to the non-European nations belonged to the United States before 1803. To prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons, any nuclear weapons or production facilities located in non-European areas would be moved to new sites within the European area. Prisoners and other institutionalized persons would go with their race. With the exception of indigenous peoples, non-European racial elements in the other European countries of Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand would be encouraged to repatriate to their own racial homelands. If this is not practical (e.g., if their ancestral homelands block their return) they could join other members of their race in the appropriate successor state as given above.
Racial separation is the non-destructive or preservationist solution to the racial dilemma caused by multiracialism. It is the alternative offered by the Racial Compact, based on the principle of racial rights and the ethical concept of “Many Mansions.” Its goal is the independence and preservation of the distinct branches or races of humanity in their full and undiminished form. This goal requires separation, either by the partition of a multiracial country into separate monoracial countries, or — where this is not just, desirable or practical — by the repatriation of racially incompatible populations to their own racial homelands.
In Europe, where ancient racial homelands have been violated by the recent (post-1957) immigration of incompatible racial elements, it would not be just to partition these homelands between their ancient indigenous populations and the recent immigrants, nor would it be desirable or practical to settle such incompatible elements within the close proximity of such geographically restricted areas. Consequently, the just, moral, desirable and practical solution would be the repatriation of the recent immigrants to their own racial homelands or countries of racial origin, or — if this is not practical — their transfer to a new racial homeland provided for them outside of Europe.
Also, as the indigenous populations of Europe are not all genetically compatible (for example, extensive intermixture between the populations of northern and southern Europe — Nordish and Mediterranid — would diminish or negate the genetic traits of the Nordish element), the preservation of the racial diversity of Europe requires the continued reproductive isolation of genetically incompatible populations by geographic separation. The current movement toward greater European economic and political unity should not be permitted to become a vehicle for the violation of racial rights and racial destruction by promoting the migration of non-Nordish elements into the Nordish homelands, but should adopt policies that promote racial security and preservation.
In North America (the United States and Canada), where geographical area is relatively abundant, and where incompatible racial groups have been present in large numbers for many generations, making the repatriation or removal of any major group both unjust and impractical, the luxury of space permits partition to be a practical — as well as just and moral — solution. The Nordish race — which founded both the United States and Canada, historically comprised the great majority of their populations, and still forms a declining majority — has more at stake in North America than any other racial group. Over 30% of the global Nordish population (and over 40% of the Central Nordish population) currently lives in the United States and Canada. By comparison, less than 5% of the global Congoid population lives in North America, and historically it probably never held more than 5% of the total Amerindian population until the large-scale immigration of Mexican and other Latin American Indians and Mestizos after 1965.
A racial partition of the existing multiracial nation into separate and fully independent monoracial nations, in which national and racial-genetic boundaries coincide, could take many forms. The author believes that his proposal [Link to Racial Partition for Racial Preservation] is a fair one, consistent with the Racial Golden Rule. It recognizes the primary role of the Nordish race in the development of North America, and the position of that great land mass as a primary or major Nordish racial homeland, whereas it is only a secondary or minor homeland for the other races. But it also recognizes the legitimate rights of the non-Nordish races to sufficient territory to create suitable and viable fully independent countries of their own on the North American continent.
“Also, as the indigenous populations of Europe are not all genetically compatible (for example, extensive intermixture between the populations of northern and southern Europe — Nordish and Mediterranid — would diminish or negate the genetic traits of the Nordish element), the preservation of the racial diversity of Europe requires the continued reproductive isolation of genetically incompatible populations by geographic separation.”
Could McCulloch at least pretend to care about extensive intermixture in Europe diminishing or negating the genetic traits of the Mediterranid element?
I mean, if all the White Europeans in America and Canada are put into the same State, then this creates just as much urgency to maintain Southern European subracial type in Europe as Northern European subracial type in Europe.
“By comparison, less than 5% of the global Congoid population lives in North America, and historically it probably never held more than 5% of the total Amerindian population until the large-scale immigration of Mexican and other Latin American Indians and Mestizos after 1965.”
By the way, this explains why Southern European Whites had such a hard time of it in Central and South America, not being able to genetically displace the natives like the Northern Europeans did in what became America and Canada.
89Matt Parrott
Mark,
I didn’t advocate assimilating Semites. I just received the most despicable death-threat laden tirade this morning for my advocacy work. I know you think you’re accomplishing something with your lies and your attacks
Are you really trying to play the sympathy card, Matt? While at the same time disrespecting me and calling me a liar, in addition to all of your past insults. Talk about chutzpah. “The Jew cries out as he strikes you.”
You’re the liar, you’ve made comments about assimilating Jews and consider Jews as White, one in this very thread that I quoted. Not to mention your past philo-Semitic background. Your problem is being held accountable and flip-flopping.
that you’re doing the important work of badgering people out of the movement who aren’t up to your standards of Nordic chauvinism. But please drop it. At least for a couple days.
I direct you to the name of this blog: Occidental Dissent. If you can’t stand for anyone to disagree with you then you’re going to have a very hard time with political activism.
Let me remind you again that I supported you from the beginning, but it was you that took a negative tone with me. If you don’t want me to address you directly then I won’t.
I recall reading a comment thread at Chronicles (one of only a handful I ever read) that featured paleocons (1) falling all over themselves to say they aren’t racist, while (2) indicating they would only marry and prefer their children marry other Northwestern Europeans.
I think this is more or less the attitude of most tradition-minded Americans. You are not going to win them over by telling them they are bad people for looking askance at the idea of their daughters marrying Italians.
Indeed, and even American non-Whites recognize the difference between Northern and Southern Europeans. They view Whites as those of Nordish descent. They often wrongfully try to co-opt Southern Euros and Middle Easterners.
“Indeed, and even American non-Whites recognize the difference between Northern and Southern Europeans.”
There is a North/South genetic cline in Western Europe, not surprising they’d notice it.
“They view Whites as those of Nordish descent.”
That’s crazy talk. For just one thing, it follows from this statement that Non-Whites think Russians are Non-White.
“They often wrongfully try to co-opt Southern Euros and Middle Easterners.”
Middle Easterners are White according to you?
I’m surprised you’d say that.
“It was one of the biggest mistakes Latin Whites ever made, as it led to the loss of possibly the single most valuable thing we ever created or had.”
Not exactly sure what this means. I’m not that knowledgeable about Roman history. What did the Romans do to Germanics besides try to conquer them? And how was this one of the biggest mistakes Latins ever made?
N/A,
I didn’t say that Nordish Nationalists are bad people for looking askance at assimilating Meds. I said that the rift is deep enough that there will eventually need to be two parallel movements. I’m not being disrespectful toward Nordish Nationalists.
Mark,
I am not Jewish. I don’t have Jewish heritage or affiliation of any kind. I didn’t advocate for assimilating Jews in this thread. I said that WN Jews are to be regarded as a separate nation, a parallel movement. I declared it “vexing” what to do with those who have Jewish ancestry. That’s far from advocating for assimilating Jews.
I didn’t demand that you stop it or try to get your posts deleted. I asked you to stop attacking me. I didn’t start “this” and “this” is all I’m asking you to drop. I’m not asking you to stop debating. But you’re not debating, you’re attacking me. You’re saying that I’m a philo-Semite when I’m not. Now you’re implying strongly that I’m a Jew when I’m not.
As for the lying. I ask third parties to read my posts and decide for themselves if I’m advocating for assimilating Jews.
I can stand for people to disagree with me, but you consistently do more than disagree with me. You make it personal. This is exhausting for me. And, yes, it probably doesn’t bode well for my activism.
103Reginald
“They view Whites as those of Nordish descent.”
That’s crazy talk. For just one thing, it follows from this statement that Non-Whites think Russians are Non-White.
Part of the Russian population is Nordish.
“They often wrongfully try to co-opt Southern Euros and Middle Easterners.”
Middle Easterners are White according to you?
I’m surprised you’d say that.
Straw man. I never said Middle Easterners are White, but they are Caucasoid.
Afrocentric blacks often claim ancient Egyptians and Hebrews were black, and those from the Middle East and Southern Europe are part black.
A lot of Latinos think Spain is populated by mestizos like them.
104Matt Parrott
I didn’t advocate for assimilating Jews in this thread. I said that WN Jews are to be regarded as a separate nation, a parallel movement.
You said “endogamous” Jews are to be regarded as separate.
59Matt Parrott
We (White American Nationalists) have no more or less in common with Nordish American Nationalists than we do with any other White identity movement in Europe, South Africa, or anywhere else. We definitely need to work with alongside them in the struggles to come, just like we need to work with BNP, Jobik, and Boers.
In fact, I think this is the relationship we should insist on having with WN Jews. We ought not make enemies of them or bicker with them about whether they’re White or not.
But as long as they’re endogamous Jews, they can’t claim to be the same nationality. Period. By definition (perhaps not a universal definition), a nation is generally endogamous.
What to do with people who have Jewish ancestry but identify exclusively as White Americans and appear indistinguishably White? To my mind, that’s the only truly vexing question in all this.
1. According to Matt, WNs have no more or less in common with WN Jews than Nordish American nationalists or European White nationalists and we need to work alongside WN Jews.
2. According to Matt, we shouldn’t question whether Jews are White or not, we accept them as White as long as they’re WN and are not endogamous. Not endogamous implies they will mix with Whites.
3. It’s vexing to Matt what to do with mischlings who look White. This is an appeal of assimilation, otherwise why is it a concern?
4. Considering Jews as White fits in with your former allegiance to AmRen and your current association with CoCC. (Not that I have anything against those groups, just some disagreements such as the inclusion of Jews as White.)
I’m not saying you’re philo-Semitic now, I said you were previously. I think you are anti-Jewish behavior, rather than against Jews as a race.
I’m not calling you a Jew, but that proverb was applicable to your comment.
You keep saying I’m attacking you, what attacks? I disagree with certain aspects of your ideology.
I am not trying to badger you out of WN as you claim or cause you to go into a depression. If you want I will not address you directly.
There are a lot of WNs who don’t mind assimilating Jews who ideologically agree with us, so you’re not alone. The mainstream thinks Jews are White.
Mark,
I take back what I said about you lying. It’s apparent now that your principle objection was based on a misunderstanding.
1. According to Matt, WNs have no more or less in common with WN Jews than Nordish American nationalists or European White nationalists and we need to work alongside WN Jews.
Strategically, we don’t. They wish to carve off an endogamous sub-racial tribe from the USA, while we wish to carve off the entirety of White America from the USA. At some point during the development of the movement, these goals will become irreconcilable. All I’m saying is that we should recognize that and attempt to broker the most amicable result possible: which is separate allied movements.
2. According to Matt, we shouldn’t question whether Jews are White or not, we accept them as White as long as they’re WN and are not endogamous. Not endogamous implies they will mix with Whites.
Read more closely. I consistently assert that endogamy = ethnicity = nationality = movement. My conclusions follow from that. As I explained, the only twist to all this is that it doesn’t explain what to do with people with Jewish ancestry who identify as White Americans rather than as Jews. Even here, I stop short of “advocating” for this minority within a minority within a minority to be assimilated.
I didn’t advocate for Jews mixing with White Americans at all.
3. It’s vexing to Matt what to do with mischlings who look White. This is an appeal of assimilation, otherwise why is it a concern?
It’s not an appeal of assimilation. It’s an admission that my formula doesn’t really explain how to deal with those cases. That’s contingent upon the resolution of the “Are Jews White?” question.
“Part of the Russian population is Nordish.”
Part of the Italian population is Nordish as well, according to you.
Therefore if Non-Whites view the Russians as Nordish based on part of their population being Nordish, they should view the Italians as Nordish as well.
And if they view Italians as Nordish, your argument goes out the window.
“Straw man. I never said Middle Easterners are White, but they are Caucasoid.
Afrocentric blacks often claim ancient Egyptians and Hebrews were black, and those from the Middle East and Southern Europe are part black.
A lot of Latinos think Spain is populated by mestizos like them.”
Okay. But probably they do this out of a political motive. If the majority of American Whites weren’t Northern European, they wouldn’t feel the urge to try and isolate Northern European Whites from other Europe derived populations.
It’s a divide and conquer strategy.
Landser,
Why are you so obsessed with perceived slights against “Eye-talians” if you’re German?
Wanting to preserve my group and refusing to water down my identity to spare the feelings of overly-sensitive minority members does not make me a bigot.
Reginald,
“Cavalli-Sforza picked the markers he did for the reason that they were known to be selectionally neutral.”
Nope. He simply used the data that was avaiblae in the medical literature. Blood groups and immune antigens are far from selectively neutral.
For our purproses, SNP microarray data is superior in every way to the data Cavalli-Sforza relied on.
“so obvious as the interest Nordic preservationists would have in sexually disempowering French descended Men”
This is not obvious at all. From the standpoint of racial preservation, if the genes of French men are a problem, so are the genes of French women. Likewise, if French women are acceptable, so are French men.
We have an interest in securing territory to ensure longterm racial survival. We don’t have an interest in trying to maximize short term population size by breeding with racially unacceptable women.
“You think you could’ve done better?”
I’m still breathing. GLR met an untimely demise at the hands of pan-Aryan former party member “John Patler”. Here’s how William Pierce remembers Patler:
“The guy in charge of the print shop–and remember this name
–was John Patler. While I was around there, I had a chance to observe
Patler. His real name was Yanacki Patsalos. He was this dark, greasy-looking
little guy from New York, and he felt bad he was Greek instead of
Swedish or German. It really bugged him. He tried to disguise his origin
by changing his name. He had this feeling of inferiority, and he had an
envy and hatred for people with light eyes, hair, and complexion. I don’t
know exactly where this came from. Maybe it was because he had grown
up in New York and he was from a poor immigrant family and was at the
bottom of the pecking order, and at the top around where he was from
were the English, Irish, and Germans. Anyway, he was organizing the
darker members of the party against what he called the blue-eyed devils.
He was a very aggressive little turd. It was wild, surreal. . . .”
“I never said anything about personal preferences. Obviously if someone is X they have the right to be against their daughters having sex with anything other than X, if they so desire.”
In that respect, you’re more sensible than Matt.
“They just have to also be against their sons having sex with anything other than X.”
I’m sure you’ll be lecturing Italians and Greeks about that any time now.
Charlemagne,
“Eh, don’t worry, I am sure many Italian fathers would as well look askance to you looking to marry one of their daughters.”
Exactly. And it doesn’t bother me. I have no interest in Italian women. My self-esteem is not negatively impacted because some Italian or Greek would not want me marrying his daughter. Nor am I going to threaten to change my political views because of it.
Matt,
You’re welcome to refuse to work with whoever you want. But don’t try to tell us what to call ourselves.
Why are you so obsessed with perceived slights against “Eye-talians” if you’re German?
Wanting to preserve my group and refusing to water down my identity to spare the feelings of overly-sensitive minority members does not make me a bigot.
n/a,
I admit that I am somewhat partial to Italians – many that I have come across have been excellent, good family people (as well, I met a lot of Italians among the pro-White advocacy movement).
I stand by my original comment to you, that I feel you are being gratuitous in your unwarrented criticism of them, and Meds in general, especially since they are a small percentage of the American population, and more especially since most of them have assimilated into the Anglo Northern-European mainstream of White America.
Additionally, most of my political heroes – like Tom Tancredo, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and Congressman Jim Traficant just happen to be Italian Americans.
As well, n/a, I am sure that you are aware that even Richard McCulloch now agrees that all White Gentile Europeans, ‘Med’ or otherwise, should be welcomed into a potential future White ethnostate, arguing that myopically focusing on the small numbers of Italians and Greeks in America would be unecessarily quixotic, and counterproductive, especially since so many of them are significantly mixed with the NWEuro Majority members of White America.
Even Wilmot Robertson said as much, and that a few generations of mixture would nearly fully assimilate America’s southern European population.
Again, its 2010, not 1910.
“This is not obvious at all. From the standpoint of racial preservation, if the genes of French men are a problem, so are the genes of French women.”
You’re missing the fact that a few generations of Race Mixing between Nordics and French Women would bleed the Southern European Blood out of the French.
In contrast, if French Men were also allowed to Race Mix with Nordics the total amount of Southern European Blood in the Nordish Ethnostate would remain stable.
Quite possibly this stable level would be higher than you would like or prefer, or even be willing to tolerate, given your very low opinion of Southern Europeans.
“Likewise, if French women are acceptable, so are French men.”
Not if you take the long term view, as I explain above.
“I’m still breathing.”
I meant politically. Rockwell accomplished a lot more than any Nordicist has.
I doubt they’d be much or any WN movement in America today if it wasn’t for Rockwell.
“I’m sure you’ll be lecturing Italians and Greeks about that any time now.”
Italians and Greeks haven’t threatened to legally cut the core Nordic groups off from the intermediate subracial groups, while maintaining their access to those groups.
Italians and Greeks haven’t talked about taking money from Nordic taxpayers and using it to pay Nordics to have genetically Italian and Greek children.
“We don’t have an interest in trying to maximize short term population size by breeding with racially unacceptable women.”
That’s good.
Stay away from the French! They speak a language from the Ancient Romans, and they’re genetically closer to Iberians than to Swedes.
“The guy in charge of the print shop–and remember this name
–was John Patler. While I was around there, I had a chance to observe
Patler. His real name was Yanacki Patsalos. He was this dark, greasy-looking
little guy from New York, and he felt bad he was Greek instead of
Swedish or German. It really bugged him. He tried to disguise his origin
by changing his name. He had this feeling of inferiority, and he had an
envy and hatred for people with light eyes, hair, and complexion. I don’t
know exactly where this came from. Maybe it was because he had grown
up in New York and he was from a poor immigrant family and was at the
bottom of the pecking order, and at the top around where he was from
were the English, Irish, and Germans. Anyway, he was organizing the
darker members of the party against what he called the blue-eyed devils.
He was a very aggressive little turd. It was wild, surreal. . . .”
n/a,
Even though you are quoting Pierce, with all due respect, besides this being an old story, this is a rather crude and vulgar example to use in the context of this conversation.
This type of story, even if overall accurate, is certainly atypical of many normal, mainstream Greek Americans that live in the US. Not all, or even most Greeks, are ‘dark, greasy-looking little guys’ – nor do all, or even most North-Euros look like Vikings. This is a gratuitous and uncalled for stereotype.
It also seems to betray a certain personal problem or hangup on your part to even cite it – considering how hurtful and humiliating it seems intended to be. Not very objective, either.
I’m still breathing. GLR met an untimely demise at the hands of pan-Aryan former party member “John Patler”. Here’s how William Pierce remembers Patler: – n/a
—
n/a,
I wish to apologize to you for reading, and citing, your quote in my last comment out-of-context.
I did not fully read the content in which you were relating the ‘Patler’ story – how indeed he was motivated by, very likely, ethnic malice toward GLR in behaving and ultimately betraying him how he did, and ultimately the greater cause he putatively served.
Although I do not think that this is the ethnic or cultural norm for most of America’s southern European or Med minority, I do not as well think that was the point that you were trying to make. Additionally, it was wrong on my part alleging bigotry on your motives in your overall commentary.
So again, my sincere apologies.
113Landser
As well, n/a, I am sure that you are aware that even Richard McCulloch now agrees that all White Gentile Europeans, ‘Med’ or otherwise, should be welcomed into a potential future White ethnostate
LOL, when did he write that? McCulloch has renounced all of his work and joined the Pan-Aryan Front, eh?
Even Wilmot Robertson said as much, and that a few generations of mixture would nearly fully assimilate America’s southern European population.
Again, its 2010, not 1910.
And what makes you think Southern Europeans want to be assimilated? Many of them are proud of their heritage.
For a German you sure take this personally, you argue as if you’re a Mediterranean.
All the good Germans I’ve known support Nordish preservation.
Richard McCulloch still supports the goal of Nordish preservation.
He recently augmented his partition map, which was written for a TOQ essay, in order to bring it in line with the wider goals of TOQ; however, he has not changed his opinion on the need to preserve the uniqueness of what he dubs “The Nordish Race,” which is the work to which he has devoted his life.
Richard’s piece on The Nordish Race at RacialCompact.com was updated about two months ago, and I exchanged an e-mail with him on Nordish preservation just this morning (04/20/2010).
And what makes you think Southern Europeans want to be assimilated? Many of them are proud of their heritage.
For a German you sure take this personally, you argue as if you’re a Mediterranean.
All the good Germans I’ve known support Nordish preservation.
Mark,
Thanks for the compliment, regarding ‘arguing like a Mediterranean’ (lol), means I must convey some passion in how I speak. ;}
Well, at any rate, I do not fully agree with everything regarding Nordishness — although I fully agree with protecting Northern European and Northern European American culture. Too much of the ‘Nordish theory’ is just that, and is, at times, more rationalizing than rational.
It’s just that, like I said so many times, many of America’s White Meds, such as the Italians, have largely been assimilated, and it is, imho, sorely counterproductive in alienating them from our far more important goal of securing a non-Jewish dominated White ethnostate.
Additionally like I said, I have known a lot of Italian people and friends over the years (“not that there is anything wrong with that” lol) and they or most Italian AMericans that I have met do not fit your typical talmudvision stereotypes, and all consider themselves full members of not only America, but White America as well.
This is the problem with being so darn insular in America today – almost no one travels, and, even besides that, no one really gets to know eachother on an individual, personal basis – so they rely on stereotypes from the media, or reading, anachronistically, too many 100 year old books and forming their opinion based on that.
Especially as a Southerner, Mark, you should be keenly aware of this prejudice directed against you and your region.
So, this is why I feel the way that I do. I am pro-White, first and foremost, and I stick up for good people whoever they are, and whenever they get unfairly maligned, whether they are Nord, Med, or Southerner.
Richard McCulloch still supports the goal of Nordish preservation.
He recently augmented his partition map, which was written for a TOQ essay, in order to bring it in line with the wider goals of TOQ; however, he has not changed his opinion on the need to preserve the uniqueness of what he dubs “The Nordish Race,” which is the work to which he has devoted his life. – Robert
—
Robert,
Yes, here is some of Mr. McCulloch’s quotes on the matter — of which I find eminantly reasonable –
This is the problem with being so darn insular in America today – almost no one travels, and, even besides that, no one really gets to know eachother on an individual, personal basis – so they rely on stereotypes from the media, or reading, anachronistically, too many 100 year old books and forming their opinion based on that.
I don’t dislike Italians or have a grudge against them, it is not personal for me. For some reason people keep jumping to conclusions with no basis whatsoever. I like Scarface and Goodfellas as much as the next guy. This is not a value judgment. It’s about subracial preservation and honoring who created the country.
I’m curious about some of McCulloch’s decisions. If America is to cede a good portion of its country to non-Whites, many of whom are recent immigrants, does he advocate the same for all White nations? I find this to be ridiculous for European nations especially. Instead of Whites bordering Whites, we’ll have pockets of the third world everywhere.
The reason McCulloch changed his mind:
This makes my proposal consistent with the “official” TOQ definition of our racial “in-group” although at a racial cost to the northern European racial identity of the country.
1. A European racial grouping consisting of the European-American population (i.e., those Americans of European racial type and ancestry) and centered around the Northern European or Nordish-American population as its founding, racially defining and predominant core element.
He hasn’t changed this though, which I think still infuriates some people. It’s like: “Okay, darnit, we’ll assimilate you, but you must then become Nordicist yourself!”
It would also include those persons of mixed European and non-European ancestry whose European ancestry is predominant, whose non-European ancestry is not physically obvious, whose physical phenotype or appearance is within the normal European range (i.e., who are of European racial type), who are socially recognized and identified as European, and who are assimilated into, and personally identify themselves with, the European-American population.
Well, self-identification isn’t really that good of a standard. This is a bit curious, because I wonder how much non-White ancestry he finds acceptable. Robert, do you know what his standards are regarding this?
I don’t dislike Italians or have a grudge against them, it is not personal for me. For some reason people keep jumping to conclusions with no basis whatsoever. I like Scarface and Goodfellas as much as the next guy.
Mark,
There you go again confirming my “knowing’ people through what I saw on Talmudvision” hypothesis.
This is a stereotype that many normal Italian-Americans find somewhat distasteful.
This would be like saying that someone doesn’t dislike Southerners or have a gridge against them cause “they like ‘Gone with the Wind’, or ‘Deliverance’ just as much as the next guy”.
C’mon man – we have to battle unfair stereotypes against any and all Whites.
‘gridge’ = should read ‘grudge’
Landser, it was a joke, lighten up a bit you’ll live longer.
My position has nothing whatsoever to do with stereotypes or behavior as I said before. You seem unable to grasp that. It’s like when White nationalists are interviewed by the MSM and they repetitively ask inane questions like “So why do you hate Jews and blacks so much?”
It’s apparent now that your principle objection was based on a misunderstanding.
Right… I’m misunderstanding you, you say. When you say (a) what you really mean is (b), (c) or (d). Blagojevich eat your heart out.
So when you said Jews are just smart White people who are managerial, did you not really mean they’re White?
Landser, it was a joke, lighten up a bit you’ll live longer.
Point taken 😉
I’m curious about some of McCulloch’s decisions. If America is to cede a good portion of its country to non-Whites, many of whom are recent immigrants, does he advocate the same for all White nations? I find this to be ridiculous for European nations especially. Instead of Whites bordering Whites, we’ll have pockets of the third world everywhere.
No, he does not advocate ceding parts of Europe. He says non-European racial elements in Europe would repatriate to their ancestral homelands or, if that is not possible, they would join other members of their race in the appropriate state in North America.
From “The Racial Golden Rule”:
From “Racial Partition for Racial Preservation”:
From “The Preservationist Alternative”:
http://www.racialcompact.com/preservationalternative.html
“Also, as the indigenous populations of Europe are not all genetically compatible (for example, extensive intermixture between the populations of northern and southern Europe — Nordish and Mediterranid — would diminish or negate the genetic traits of the Nordish element), the preservation of the racial diversity of Europe requires the continued reproductive isolation of genetically incompatible populations by geographic separation.”
Could McCulloch at least pretend to care about extensive intermixture in Europe diminishing or negating the genetic traits of the Mediterranid element?
I mean, if all the White Europeans in America and Canada are put into the same State, then this creates just as much urgency to maintain Southern European subracial type in Europe as Northern European subracial type in Europe.
“By comparison, less than 5% of the global Congoid population lives in North America, and historically it probably never held more than 5% of the total Amerindian population until the large-scale immigration of Mexican and other Latin American Indians and Mestizos after 1965.”
By the way, this explains why Southern European Whites had such a hard time of it in Central and South America, not being able to genetically displace the natives like the Northern Europeans did in what became America and Canada.
We were stuck with +95% of the Injuns.