This last week we witnessed yet another instance of anti White forces playing:
The RACE card.
In this case the NAACP – an openly Black racial advocacy group accused the Tea Party movement of having White racists in their ranks. We also witnessed yet another instance of supposedly White patriot leaders pandering to our enemies, denying that they are in any way racist and that they hate all White racists and some of their best friends are Blacks and how they support racial integration, worship Martin Luther King etc.
Pathetic!
It seams that most White Americans will always back down, give in, deny, deny, deny any loyalty to our people/culture whenever anyone plays the race card – puts out the smear:
“YOU”RE a RACIST”
Though White mothers tell their children that “sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me” – the reality is that in modern day America, name calling Whites “RACIST” hurts and most Whites simply do not know what to do when they are smeared and most Whites back down, give in, give up.
I like to show a video of one of the worst instances of a supposedly White leader backing down, giving up simply by being called a name – smeared as a “RACIST” – anti Black, anti Gay, anti Israel.
Ron Paul reacts to the smear campaign launched by Jewish lib/Zionist homosexual Martin Peretz,[8]
In this CNN news story, interview – Ron Paul agrees to be grilled by ex AIPAC agent Wolf Blitzer and answer the accusations that Ron Paul’s newsletter included criticism of the Black rioters/murderers in the LA Rodney King riots, criticism of the Israeli lobbies control of US foreign policy and various negative comments about homosexual extremists spreading AIDS.
Here’s the video:
I would like for others to share their own comments about Ron Paul’s performance here. I will just say that in my opinion Ron Paul simply gives in 100% – accepts the idea/lie that any White American who says or thinks anything negative about Black criminals, homosexual extremists or the Israeli lobby is a thought criminal, hate criminal and deserves to be banished from public life. Ron Paul doesn’t want to be banished from public life, in fact he loves being on TV, even with the likes of Wolf Blitzer, so in hopes of getting back on the good side of the likes of Wolf Blitzer, the New Republic (Jew Republic), CNN, AIPAC, Lib Dems, Neo Cons etc, Ron Paul denies that he wrote the hateful things in his newsletter and denies that he even read these terrible things in his own newsletter and he expresses his deep love of the anti White diversity cult, his deep respect for Wolf Blitzer and his love for Big Brother etc… Check out ~ 7:00 in to this vid where Ron Paul breaks down and embraces his torturers.
I would like to read what commentators would suggest Ron Paul should have done in this situation and then I will share some suggestions of what future White leaders might do in future situations, as this will come up over and over and over again until White leaders, White people start to learn how to handle the Race Card, responding to the “YOU’RE A RACIST” charge.
I don’t think I have the stomach to watch the video, so I can’t respond to it directly, but it seems that usually, when accusations of racism fly, it’s not because somebody said “Nigger”, but because they mentioned an unmentionable truth. The proper response therefore is first to recognize that the point of the accusation is to silence you, or at least distract you from speaking the truth. Second is to ignore the “racism” accusation, other than to accuse your accuser of ducking the issue. Return to your unmentionable truth and cram it down your accuser’s throat. “Are you telling me that Blacks do NOT have a homicide rate that is eleven times the White rate?” “Are you telling me that Jews do NOT occupy high positions in the media all out of proportion to their numbers in this country?” If these people want to argue against the obvious, let them make fools of themselves.
Laughter and ridicule are the best response, imo. “Racism” has jumped the shark, as Obama calling Al Quaida “racist” indicates.
Simple, effective response that works like magic:
“I love my own nation/race, and family more than I love other nations or familes. We’re a real people with 1000’s of years of proud heritage and we have a right to exist just as any other people , race or nation. Sorry if you don’t like that, but that’s the truth.”
I cannot use it often enough.
Not to speak up for your own nation — your own mothers and fathers and sons and daughters and grandchildren – is despicable. To cower before the commie “racist” tag is to abandon your family and give them and your entire heritage up to the multicult.
My advice is to immediately get off the defensive, and try to use humor, sarcasm and don’t be afraid to go on the attack, get down in the gutter with those who are smearing you, trying to destroy your career, your life.
Too many “respectable” White Americans try to be polite and appeal to the fairness and kindness of the accusers – they respond by saying, “I’m really not an evil, horrible RACIST person, really I’m not”.
Instead, use humor and go on the attack.
Try something like this:
“No, I’m not racist, not racist at all – some of MY BEST FRIENDS are Islamic extremists like Mohammed Ata – I think it’s great, just great that we allow these Islamic terrorists in to our country on unsupervised student visas and let them hi-jack our airplanes and mass murder our people in OUR OWN COUNTRY. I think that’s just great. These Al Qaeda terrorists are bring our country the joys of DIVERSITY – bringing us culturally enriching customs like doing SUICIDE BOMBINGS, HONOR KILLINGS, FEMALE CIRCUMCISION and (If the accusing interviewer is some bimbo woman reporter) Julie darling, I notice that you’re not wearing a burka tonight – don’t you think that is cultural offensive to growing Muslim Jihadists in America?”
The legitimate response would be either,
“Fuck off” or “Say that again and I will break your nose.”
But that would engender a police response and few among us are willing to endure as much.
Heavy sigh …
Appeasement got us here. The only way out is more and better appeasement.
Robert Frost wrote “A liberal is one who can’t take his own side in an argument.”
It seems a White is one who cannot take his own side in an argument.
Best answer that I know:
“In you opinion am I a racist, you only say that because I am White.
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White”
Check out WhiteRabbitRadio for demonstrations.
Peter Brimelow -Editor at Vdare has good comments, come backs for the “You’re a RACIST or Are you a Racist?” attack.
Brimelow says:
“A RACIST is someone who is winning an argument with a Liberal or now, sadly with a Libertarian”.
Brimelow also suggested a stronger come back for a more vicious, personal “Are Your a RACIST.”
Brimelow suggests answering a smear, accusatory question with a similar question:
Q: “Are You a …… RACIST”?!!
AQ “Are you a child molester”?
🙂
Whatever you do, don’t do what Ron Paul did here, give in, give up, deny you ever said, wrote or thought anything RACIST in your whole life, try to suck up to the vicious anti White accuser – don’t go down that route.
14 Words.
The best response would be to disable them immediately.
“I’m not one to acknowledge or employ words invented by the Communist Leon Trotsky. If you consider it wrong for me to want my children to look like me, and to see my family prosper, then we will remain at odds indefinitely. If you consider this to be racism, then all men are racist and the word is left meaningless.”
Paul is an old doddering wordist stuck in 1970. Go with the anti-white line, “You are saying that because you are anti-white and nothing else.”
Bring any of the anti-whites here and we can break them in no time, they never have faced an accuser except when they were drafted into their particular guilt cult.
If and when someone calls you a racist, simply ask “Racist….hum, that’s an intresting word, sounds made up what is your definition of a ‘Racist’ Then let them stammer over their words and a definition what they think racist means. Then you can ask who are the real racist. A person who loves their race, is proud of all it’s accomplishments, a person who wants to preserve it’s heritage and thinks it’s worth preserving and a person who wants to live with their own kind. Or is a racist a person who is trying to destroy ones culture and heritage. A person who is trying to break down ones pride in their heritage with diversity,multi-culterism and inter race breeding.
Then you can recite a quote from Muhmand Ali ” Bluebirds fly with Bluebirds, Hawks soar with hawks and ducks quack with ducks, these are all birds but prefer to be with their own kind and only a fool wants to be with someone other then his own.”
I also like turn the tables on our accusers and play “the name game”, when they play the “race card”.
I make the point that one of the leading groups accusing us of being “RACIST” is the National Council of LaRaza which translates as
THE RACE
It’s a Latino racial advocacy group named “THE RACE”.
So I say.
“When a group called THE RACE accuses us of being RACIST, that’s like the Gambino Crime family accusing someone of being “a criminal”.
The very name of the organization proudly shouts that they are RACIST for LaRaza, THE RACE/Their race.
And it’s the same with the Black Congressional Caucus, Black Entertainment TV, NAACP and also Jewish groups promoting the power and interest of their group, often at the expense of regular White Americans.
The BNP tactic is to flat out deny they are a ‘racist’, and then just move on with their original point. Probably the best one, since the ‘racist’ term is quickly losing its magic, and will soon rightly be relegated to the status of inane attacks like ‘idiot’ or ‘moron’.
I hope folks here took the time to actually see this video where Ron Paul actually agrees to go on air at CNN with Wolf Blitzer – former lobbyist for AIPAC and the whole thing is a Stalinesque show trial where Ron Paul’s entire life has been combed over to find any instances of “RACISM”.
Ron Paul seems perfectly fine with the whole affair and just denies, denies, denies – denies he ever wrote or said anything racist and denies he even read his own newsletter where someone else might have said something racist.
Ron Paul whines that he has never done, said, written or even thought a RACIST thought in his entire life and Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks are his heroes.
I would say that’s about as bad as it gets.
I would like to get Ron Paul to go door to door in near by South Side of Chicago all Black neighborhoods and have Ron Paul try to sell his Libertarian race-less philosophy to the Black underclass masses and Ron Paul would also try to convince everyone he meet including his soon to be killers that….
He was not in anyway RACIST.
🙂
I am not a racist, Wolf.
I have attended meetings of the racist NAACP and La Raza organizations to find out what they were promoting, Wolf, and frankly I was shocked and appalled. That’s the only exposure to racial supremecy groups I’ve had.
I’m not aware of any similar organizations arguing for special priviliges and lower admission standards for Whites. Are you Wolf? So it seems to me that racism, as a powerful organized force, is really only practiced by Latinos and Blacks at this point, so frankly, Wolf, I’m puzzled why you would even ask me the question.
Very good Mr. Jackson.
I would also maybe suggest Ron Paul could have given some personal jibes Wolf’s way.
Something like:
And Wolf…. is that really your real name Wolf Blitzer?
Didn’t Mr. and Mrs. Blitzer really give birth to some child somewhere and named him
“Wolf”
🙂
If defending myself or my race makes me a racist, then I’m a racist. Big deal, the term is meaningless anymore.
Most people don’t even know the actual meaning since it’s so broadbrushed now.
I like to reply “Of course I’m a racist! Did you take me for a fool?”. But of course, I’m not a politician; it would be instant career death for Ron Paul to say something like that. So they all lie, they all grovel. But, as Murphy said, if you try to please everybody, somebody’s not going to like it.
The saddest thing is, I don’t think he caved. He really believes that stuff. Of course, on a fundamental level, nobody who has had significant dealings with Negroes believes that the races are equal, but they really want to believe it.
Jack Ryan, sorry, but you opened the door… Godwin’s Law alert:
“Wolf; that’s English for Adolph, isn’t it?”
Anyone expect to see Wolf Blitzer on CNN asking Benjamin Netanyahu if he’s a racist? Blitzer is engaged in tribal war. Whites are so thick they don’t see it.
I don’t know what the editors and readers of the Occidental Dissent think of David Duke – I think he is/was good at some things, not so good on others.
But one thing I like about David Duke is he is always, always very good on live TV interviews. He is never on the defensive, he never grovels, gives in and he also never gets angry or flustered.
David Duke knows how to handle Wolf Blitzer in a live one on one interview/fight.
Duke will never get all scared and panic just when someone says he was/is “RACIST”.
Duke might box and weave a bit, say he has done a lot of things since being in the KKK – he was elected to the state house of Representatives, earned a PHD, was a best selling author and even when he was in the KKK, he was never violent etc, and then Duke will take control of the interview and present a positive program for our people.
In this video, Ron Paul is completely on defense the whole time, and the issue is only
Does he deny or plead guilty to these terrible charges of RACISM.
And Ron Paul just denies, gives in, panders – it’s pathetic.
Fred Scrooby says:
July 20, 2010 at 9:37 pm
“Anyone expect to see Wolf Blitzer on CNN asking Benjamin Netanyahu if he’s a racist? Blitzer is engaged in tribal war. Whites are so thick they don’t see it.”
I don’t think it is so much that Whites and Ron Paul don’t “see it”, don’t recognize that they/we Whites are in tribal/racial conflicts.
No, it’s more that they/we don’t know what to do – don’t know how to fight in this way, how to respond to unfair smears, name calling.
our side is always well dressed, well mannered, doesn’t take offense, respectful of the other side and when it gets nasty, and the smears, gutter fighting stars, our side doesn’t know what to do.
Watch the video.
Ron Paul looks clueless – some homosexual Zionist Jew editor of the New Republic magazine starts a smear campaign against Paul – says his newsletter contained “RACIST” “Anti Gay” anti Israel comments over a 20 year period and Ron Paul just
Doesn’t know what to do or say.
So Ron Paul just gives in, gives up, denies he ever said, wrote, thought or even read such terrible RACIST things.
The point of my thread here is to help other racial aware Whites learn some things to do in similar situations, they will come up in work, school, social situations.
Think about what you will do, could do and practice.
Getting called a name, even a vicious smear name like “YOU’RE A RACIST” isn’t as bad as being homosexual raped in prison – so don’t panic or get so scared that you do like Ron Paul did here – punked out.
I tell them that I am racist, and also a “hater.” I tell them to think up the worst word, the greatest heresy in their Liberal Orthodox Church – Anti-Semite, check, Intolerant, ditto. I match all of the labels that their printing press can churn out!
And yet, as measured by the historical Western tradition, all such labels are ludicrous. A white man should judge by deeds. I ask them how many Negro prostates did they feel today? How many Latino widows received kleenix from you for their tears? How many mudsharks did they talk to about poor decisions, economic and familial?
I’m their worst frickin’ nightmare, because I don’t belong to their church, and don’t want to belong. I am free, and I am alive… and celebrate life. They belong to the Temple of Death. Fear keeps them moving. Love motivates me. This is why Red Jefferey is so awesome, in a sick and twisted way. How his soul must ache.
I’d rather live a day as a free man than a lifetime as a white slave.
Mike
I liked it when someone else said…
“Yeah, I’m a racist. That means I promote th interests of my people just like non-whites are racist and promote the interests of theirs.”
In defense of Ron Paul: he was elected to represent all of the citizens of his district, and as such, he is no more legally entitled to play ethnic favorites than Shirley Sherrod, the recently fired USDA employee.
Randy Garver says:
July 21, 2010 at 12:22 am
“In defense of Ron Paul: he was elected to represent all of the citizens of his district, and as such, he is no more legally entitled to play ethnic favorites than Shirley Sherrod, the recently fired USDA employee.”
No one asks that Ron Paul play ethnic favorites or not represent decent folks in his district who are not White.
But we do ask that Ron Paul not humiliate himself and humiliate our race to the likes of Wolf Blitzer by denying that he ever wrote or even read his own newsletter which contained (very fair) negative comments towards Black rioters/murderers, the Israeli Lobby, homosexual extremists.
Just look at the video I posted here.
This is pathetic. A White man giving in, bowing down, sucking up, renouncing his own people – for what?
To try to get on the good side of Wolf Blitzer, CNN, the New Republic/Jew Republic?
All evidence indicates that Ron Paul would submit to homosexual humiliation by Marty Peretz of the New Republic just to show that he wasn’t RACIST, anti gay, anti Israel etc.
This was really bad – and it’s completely unnecessary. This pandering, this cowardice serves no purpose.
Don’t ever give up, bow down and whine that you aren’t racist and that you hate White racially conscious people and that you think Black rioters, gang members are misunderstood victims and you deeply admire the likes of Wolf Blitzer and the Jewish MSM.
Be strong White men – don’t punk out.
Why be disappointed in Paul Sr. or Jr.?? Their business is winning elections, and that means pandering. To big money and big media. Jews and Jews. Our business: eliminating this “elections” thing, and for a long time to come.
CompassionateFascist says:
“Why be disappointed in Paul Sr. or Jr.?? Their business is winning elections, and that means pandering. To big money and big media. Jews and Jews.”
How did Ron Paul’s pandering, denying he ever wrote, said, thought or even read anything RACIST in his own newsletter – how did this help him win any elections?
Ron Paul did not win a single state in the GOP primary. He won all of 22 delegates.
Most regular White folks can’t understand Libertarian theories and when they do, they think it’s crazy, and I would hazard to guess that about 90% plus of regular Whites do not like Black LA gang members, rioters, murderers. Racial pandering against your own White people is not an election winning strategy, it’s just cowardice.
Watch this Ron Paul video interview with Wolf Blitzer again. Don’t let this be you.
Interviewer: You’re a racist.
Interviewee: Can you prove to me – using actual science, such as neurophysics or physical anthropology – that anyone is less racist than anyone else?
Until I see such a proof in a peer-reviewed journal, I will continue to state that everyone is equally and inherently racist. Racism is hardwired into all human brains. Everyone is a racist, and everyone is exactly as racist as everyone else.
A few years ago, when Ron Paul came along, saying all the right things, I was understandably impressed. Despite my general and overwhelming distaste for all politicians, I held out hope that he was legit and that the American People had the sense and integrity to grasp the majority of his very basic Constitutional agenda. Well , because of my deep desire to help my country out of the total Zionist mind warp it finds itself in, I ended up giving him around 400 hard earned dollars to run for President.
Long story short…..he let me down……horribly.
As for the American people……….they have proven to be a most pathetic lot, most of which largely deserve what is coming.
I will never have faith in either again.
Wesley says:
July 21, 2010 at 2:11 am
A few years ago, when Ron Paul came along, saying all the right things, I was understandably impressed. Despite my general and overwhelming distaste for all politicians, I held out hope that he was legit and that the American People had the sense and integrity to grasp the majority of his very basic Constitutional agenda. Well , because of my deep desire to help my country out of the total Zionist mind warp it finds itself in, I ended up giving him around 400 hard earned dollars to run for President.
Long story short…..he let me down……horribly.
As for the American people……….they have proven to be a most pathetic lot, most of which largely deserve what is coming.
I will never have faith in either again.”
Why not just look for younger, stronger White men and women to support? Support White folks who don’t suck up, back down, pander? Support White folks who actually have some chance of competing to win or even yes winning!
Whites are doing great now in boxing, MMA – and in European politics. Why do you and so many other White Americans do foolish things like giving money to old, no hope Libertarian guys running for President of the United States?
Why put your money and hopes in some old White guy who will just back down, pandering, whine, deny he ever thought a RACIST thought in his life, why not find some White men & women who are strong, smart, don’t cry and back down just because some Jew like Wolf Blitzer called them “RACIST”?
Having followed Ron Paul closely for several years, I fully believe that if he were president, he would be a champion of limited government and freedom of association and freedom of speech. His unshakeable belief in the holy spirit of the Constitution and the wisdom of the Founding Fathers trumps all his personal moral beliefs, however multiculti. He would definitely not be for government-imposed quotas of any kind. Of all the candidates, he is the best and most predictable by far.
He is here staying on-message. For him to start a new battle over race would be instant political suicide, and he knows it.
Rusty says:
July 21, 2010 at 2:47 am
Having followed Ron Paul closely for several years, I fully believe that if he were president, he would be a champion of limited government and freedom of association and freedom of speech. His unshakeable belief in the holy spirit of the Constitution ……. blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Ron Paul was never going to be President of the United States. A 75 year old Libertarian with a whiney voice, who refuses to acknowledge basic reality the reality that Americans vote strictly according to race, ethnicity or class – an old man like this has as much chance of being elected President of the United States as he has of winning the Miss Teen America contest.
Just look at this video – the interview with Wolf Blitzer. Just look what this old White man is doing – he is pandering, denying that he wrote, said, thought or even read his own newsletter where there was – HORRORS OF HORRORS negative comments about the Black rioters/murderers in the LA Rodney King riots.
Do you really think White Americans want Presidential leaders who think it is perfectly OK for Black gang members to drag White motorists out of their vehicles to murder them?
Life in America 2010 really isn’t that complicated. You don’t need some PHD in Austrian economics to understand what’s going on. What’s going on in Detroit, LA, East St. Louis, Arizona – just about anywhere.
It’s called reality – including a big dose of RACIAL REALITY.
The Blacks always take the Black side.
Mexicans always take the Mexican side.
Jews always always take the Jew side and mostly take the anti White side.
But our side, the White side insists on trying to teach race-less political and economic systems – even going so far as to break down in public to denounce their own White race all in the hopes of gaining the understanding of other races that hate us and abuse us.
Enough of this.
Just make a simple vow tonight to stop supporting cowards and pussies. If we go down to extinction and genocide so be it, but we will go down in a courageous way with a smile on our lips and not die crying and whimpering like pathetic old men.
14 Words.
Very true Jack Ryan.
Some great replies. The term “racist” is meaningless. It truly is a Soviet term to attack free speech and demonize political speech that was “counter-revolutionary”. What is it doing here in the USA?
I liked this response:
“The proper response therefore is first to recognize that the point of the accusation is to silence you, or at least distract you from speaking the truth. Second is to ignore the “racism” accusation, other than to accuse your accuser of ducking the issue. Return to your unmentionable truth and cram it down your accuser’s throat. …”
I also thought maybe you could just say that the word “racism” is just a political tool used to shut white people up from speaking the truth about their own genuine interests. Period.
Jack Ryan,
I understand the jest of your point but you are as misguided in your solution as those that you chastise. I don’t care how bold some prospective white leader talks. He’s either a mole or will be neutralized along the way. Count on it. I know how this country is “supposed” to work. I have a Political Science degree to back it up. Now having said that, I will offer my “educated” opinion. There is NO political solution for white Americans, now and especially in the future. The percentages have gone so far against us and continue to erode more year by year, that such thinking is delusional, bordering on the fanatically religious. Even worse than that, is the brain washing that has been indoctrinated into our people for close to 50 years, right from the crib. The majority of our people will NEVER support anything that resembles a pro white agenda. They may rally temporarily behind an economic or foreign policy issue but “race”……forget it.
I’m not saying that things cannot change in this country. What I am saying is that anyone who thinks we are going to VOTE the pro white agenda into power, in this country, at this time, is sadly mistaken. More truthfully, the term should be “naive” to the reality of the world around them.
Courage and voracity has nothing to do with it. Only a fool plays a game, when the rules are stacked against him winning. Thus I stand here and say to you, anyone who plays the American political system, thinking they will win, barring having billions of dollars to buy it, is a fool.
It is just that simple.
Up here in the Northwoods I, thankfully, have no contact with Negroes or Mestizos, so it’s either White liberals or perhaps the odd Jew who might bring this up.
The first thing I say when called/asked if I am a racist is:
“If you mean that I hate people because they are a different race, I am not a racist. However, I Love and advocate for and support and will fight for people of my own race above all others and I would like to live in a country populated 100% by European peoples. If that makes me a racist in your eyes then you may call me anything you wish.”
Then, if it is a Jew I am talking to I simply ask if Isrealis are racists for wanting to live with their own kind.
If it is (as usual) a White liberal, I ask him to please be honest with himself and answer this:
“Why are YOU living in this lilly White Nothwoods when you could be exeriencing some of the great multi-culturalism on the South Side of Chicago or Mexican Los Angeles?”
I do not associate with nitwits of any political stripe, so the liberals I deal with are pretty smart folks and I’m happy to say I am getting into their brains a little bit. One area that is ripe for making progress with casual liberals is illegal immigration. White people don’t like it.
I tell you, it’s easy to get down in the dumps like Hunter is today, but our people are way ahead of our faux “leaders” in the Republican Party. The fire will be lit under somebody’s butt and we’ll be on our way.
Wesley says:
July 21, 2010 at 1:24 pm
“Jack Ryan,
I understand the jest of your point but you are as misguided in your solution as those that you chastise. I don’t care how bold some prospective white leader talks. He’s either a mole or will be neutralized along the way. Even worse than that, is the brain washing that has been indoctrinated into our people for close to 50 years, right from the crib. The majority of our people will NEVER support anything that resembles a pro white agenda. They may rally temporarily behind an economic or foreign policy issue but “race”……forget it.
I’m not saying that things cannot change in this country. What I am saying is that anyone who thinks we are going to VOTE the pro white agenda into power, in this country, at this time, is sadly mistaken.”
Whites in Eastern Europe suffered much more, much worse under Communism than we Whites in North America, Eastern European Whites have come out of it and all signs indicate that they have positive White racial consciousness – they survived and are coming back. Good for them.
My experience in the US is that Whites do respond well to well designed, pro White political candidates, political programs, pro White culture etc. Richard Nixon’s Southern Strategy, Ronald Reagan’s revolution to roll back the 60s Great Society, Pat Buchanan’s populist campaigns, California initiatives against illegal immigration, recalling Gov. Grey Davis – all were overtly racialist – and Whites responded well.
This post addresses the issue – what do you do when you are called “a racist”. What does someone who is identified as someone on our side, someone – in this case Ron Paul who large numbers of Whites are excited about, feel that he speaks for us – what does that person do when called a simple name – “RACIST”.
In Ron Paul’s case, he simply gives in, gives up.
Others – hell, everyone here needs to think about what they will do in similar situations.
What do you do when you are smeared “You’re a RACIST”?
Jack Ryan,
Well personally, I smile and say, “yeah, so what’s your point?”
Once you show them that it doesn’t bother you, they quickly lose interest.
If not, tell them to bugger off.
As far as Eastern Europe goes…..I applaud them. I’ve been to several Eastern European countries before the wall came down and I saw how it affected the people. I can tell you though, with certainty, that they never did, nor never would have gained their “freedom” left to their own devices; certainly not politically and even more remotely by violence. Their situation only changed when the Soviet Union collapsed, for reasons quite apart from any political movement linked to white solidarity………..
Such a collapse of the American Empire may be the best hope that whites in this country have for any meaningful change to come in the years ahead. More to the point, it may be THE ONLY hope for real change that we will ever have. Perhaps our efforts would best be placed by looking towards that eventuality rather than wastefully working within the totally Zionist/corporate owned system in which we now live.
Finally, I only discuss this in a mood of antagonistic solidarity. There’s an oxymoron for you! We are both on the same side. Good day my friend. God bless!
In a one sentence rebuke, we could just tell them their anti-racist anti-white ideology has failed, non-whites are as “racist” as you say whites are, end of story.
It’s ok with me if the moderator removes this long rambling post of mine, but it has some valuable points. The word racist is used with different meanings, especially the leftists use it with slippery meanings, like in the Ron Paul interview. But racist and gay are different issues – you can have gays of any race. I used to live in the San Francisco area. There are gays who are very pro-White. Hard to know how many or how many might be if society was different than the one we have – same as situation with heterosexuals. One has even written significant articles on some of these Occidental groups – not the Dissent. Clashes too – too much bad blood to ever resolve. Separately, like regarding fundamentalist preachers running around with women. What an advance it would be for the pro-White movement to bring this out in a positive way. What an expansion that would be. Not easy though. We need ideas about our structure. Maybe freely self-defined segments within the pro-White movement, with certain restrictions on communication between the segments. This is a big topic. Lots of effort and time needed. Not easy. Last hundreds of lines of David Duke http://www.davidduke.com/general/from-the-abyss-david-dukes-moscow-speech_2520.html
search “homosexual”, lists so many Jewish people who started gay stuff. You might get wrong idea. But maybe some non-Jewish gays working slowly, and constructively, before that time, basically pushed aside. In past and present, some gays work with great difficulty for pro-White, because damned on two sides, one side by current dominant voice of gay group, other side by current dominant voice of pro-White movement. Maybe 1980’s strong gay pro-White German who died of AIDs. And if you’re extreme, don’t forget Ernst Rohm. I use David Irving’s “Hitler’s War” for my bible (otherwise can’t get truth) – look in index for Ernst Rohm, everything there. Hitler repeatedly delayed having Rohm shot during Night of the Long Knives event. In Leni Reifenstahl’s first film 1933, “Victory of Faith”, Rohm is often on Hitler’s right side (govt thought they destroyed all copies of the film – Leni till day she died hoped a copy could be found in Russian archives, but later one found in ?? attic in ?? Britain, ??snuck out to ??Santa Monica, CA, and made public). I often wondered if Long Knives was example of beginning of troubles, because too one-dimensional in ideas and variety of people. Another example. Search Ukraine in Irving’s index. Too different a race, so Hitler would not support them in their life and death struggle with Stalin. Increasing horrific bitterness because of that. Then too all the assassination attempts on Hitler, even by ??? the famous Sahara tank fighter Rommel in one of them (don’t have my Irving book now). Troubles so much pain troubles. Maybe because H root cause too politically one-dimensional. Look at the 14 th century poet Chaucer, his section on The Wife of Bath. Pretty shocking for being written under nose of the church. Dominant pro-White voice pictures all sex as chivalrous Medieval knights with ladies in flowing white robes. Not so. Even monogamous heterosexual couples can have surprising umm animal energy sex lives. Pro-white movement gets one-dimensional, closes itself off from rest of world, too puritan. Should look at http://www.lewrockwell.com/lind/lind146.html search 4GW toward end, and search “population’s primary loyalty” (also same author maybe same material http://lewrockwell.com/lind/lind161.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/lind/lind151.html ).
Thanks to everyone who posted here.
This is a subject we must continually bring up – train other Whites on
What to do when they are smeared “You’re RACIST”.
Practice makes perfect and understand that this is a form of psychological warfare, our enemies are trying to defeat/destroy us by messing with our minds.
So to all, please understand what is at stake – the “You’re a RACIST” smear isn’t nice, it isn’t fair, it’s not an opening to try to educate fair minded folks about the benefits of free market economics, or Constitutional Law.
It’s an all out character assassination attack – the goal is to make you, or someone who is supposed to be representing you/our people – make us look horrible, evil, so bad and terrible that we shouldn’t be allowed to speak in public or be seen in public, hold a job or be tolerated by respectable people.
Understand this ad hominem attack – when antis “play the race card”.
Be prepared and don’t give in, give up, back down.
Be strong and proud and learn to fight to win, even when our enemies are fighting down and dirty in the gutter.
During the late 1980s, when black female colleagues in racist New York agencies implied that I was a racist, or said so, outright, I replied, “Don’t ever talk to me again.”
During the 1990s, when black women told me I was a racist, I responded, “You’re the goddamn racist!”
Over the past several years, I’ve usually been the one calling them, “Racist!”
Then again, I’m not running for office, and I’m unemployable.
Paul has never advocated for Whites, he is true to his word, he is an extreme individualist and libertarian. As such he doesn’t police the words of everyone like Blitzer and his tribe do. Even this is a threat to their established anti-White orthodoxy as it wouldn’t be anti-racist enough but more neutral.
Very honored to have Nicholas Stix post here.
I love your writing on vdare.com
Let’s find some ideas for Nick to get a good job in the new economy.
thanks again to everyone who posted here.
14 words
About a week ago two religious people, older white males, knocked on my apartment door and asked if I had any spiritual interests and I said, sort of. They asked me I ever thought about what I owed God, and I said that was a complex subject, and they put their magazine in front of me.
I calmly said that the cover of the magazine was a problem because it didn’t have any people like me on it. (I was all revved up because about two hours earlier I posted a response on OD.) They asked what did I mean. I calmly said, there was no white person on it, indicating the color of my skin (there were 3 people on the cover). After a little bit maybe of shock, the guy said, well, that he wasn’t prejudiced.
Then my voice got tighter and emotional, but still civil, and I said, I’m not prejudiced, you’re the one who is prejudiced. He then said they had to go, and he turned to go down the stairs – I live on second floor and the roof of the house cuts into the stairway ceiling a little, where if you’re distracted you can hit your head. Right away he whacked his head as he started down the stairs.
I said, see, God is trying to tell you something! I felt real good about my responses on the spur of the moment. I’m sure they’ll remember the conversation for some time.
And everything I said was true, even the last thing, if you interpret God in the right way.
While “racism” is a word used for ad-hominem purposes and the meaning is unclear, calling something racist means that it is both somehow connected to race, however tenuously, and immoral. Ask the person who called you racist if he feels racism is bad or immoral, he will obviously reply “yes”. That begs the question, why does he think what you are doing or your opinions are bad or immoral? Ask him to explain why what you said, did or wish for is bad. If he cannot, declare that it was not racism.
This was not as pithy as it is when actually used right in a debate.
Jack Ryan,
Very honored to have Nicholas Stix post here.
I love your writing on vdare.com
Let’s find some ideas for Nick to get a good job in the new economy.
Hilarious. Absolutely hilarious.
Nicky Stixx just confirmed the validity of the ‘racism’ charge (he just denied he is one and accused others of being it) and you’re praising him.
Wesley,
Well personally, I smile and say, “yeah, so what’s your point?”
Once you show them that it doesn’t bother you, they quickly lose interest.
“Well, the point is it’s wrong. And it’s because of people like you that racism has to be resisted.”