For decades, Democrats have maligned Republicans for using “The Southern Strategy“, a sleazy charade where they exploit populist resentment of forced integration, cultural upheaval, and the “Civil Rights” movement altogether among White Southern voters. It’s sleazy because it’s dishonest, as the Republicans are as eagerly anti-White as Democrats.
In recent years, they’ve abandoned this effective ploy for fear that they might be accused of representing their constituents (as baseless as that accusation would be). They’ve abandoned it in favor of a new strategy: The Swarthy Strategy. Karl Rove was a huge supporter of this, chomping at the bit to pursue a genocidal displacement of his own people in a craven quest for power. But rather than relying on dog whistling or symbolism (stars and bars), the GOP got straight to the point with this less gullible demographic: Vote for us and we will facilitate your hostile invasion.
The scheme failed, and it failed hard, suffering a crushing defeat with the abortive McCain-Kennedy Amnesty Putsch of 2007. Within a couple weeks of that, Rove resigned in disgrace. McCain has never really gotten over the defeat of that bill and the overwhelming Hispanic support of Obama, suffering that special sting that comes with being a player who got played…
McCain’s message was obvious, the source continued: After bucking his party on immigration, he had no sympathy for Hispanics who are dissatisfied with President Obama’s pace on the issue. “He threw out [the words] ‘You people — you people made your choice. You made your choice during the election,’ ” the source said. “It was almost as if [he was saying] ‘You’re cut off!‘ We felt very uncomfortable when we walked away from the meeting because of that.”
This Swarthy Strategy appeared to work for the Democrats in 2008, sweeping Obama into power on a wave of record turnout among non-White voters. He managed to accomplish a hat trick of churning out record minority votes, wooing White independents, and earning the support of the Jewish bankster elites. He pulled this off by keeping his campaign above reality, relying on hypnotic mantras and charisma to keep him afloat while the popular rejection of Bush’s disastrous administration did the work for him.
But the euphoric outburst of Black support was only good for one election. The anti-Bush backlash was only good for one election. The optimistic “hope” and “change” rhetoric was also only good for one election, as his administration has failed to result in the anticipated Dawning of Aquarius. Obama’s still trying to rally his anti-White Cosmic Coalition…
…but the writing’s on the wall. Pat summarizes the crisis in his latest article, “Losing White America“, concluding: For the first time in our lifetimes, outside the South, [W]hite racial consciousness has visibly begun to rise. He’s all too correct, and the Obama who was a symbol of minority empowerment for them to celebrate has now become the symbol of White disinheritance that could destroy them.
While both the Democrats and Republicans have been on a quest for the pot of votes at the end of the diversity rainbow, the economic and cultural circumstances in White America have shifted dramatically. The open borders that the Democrats have championed the hardest have completely broken the labor unions, destroying both their Big Labor political machine and the last credible incentive for working class White males to vote Democratic. The Democratic coalition’s last White males who aren’t homosexuals or college professors are finally taking a hint.
The 2010 election won’t be remembered so much for the increased turnout of mobilized Tea Party mob, though they will certainly be out in force. The 2010 election will be remembered as the election in which the last of the White males who voted Democratic abandoned the party. Some will flip and some will stay home, allowing an epic blowout for the GOP. I predict it will be so decisive that they’ll be forced to completely reinvent their message for 2012. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that they’ll stop being anti-White; but electoral reality will force them to stop partying like it’s 2042.
For all the talk of minority voting blocs, the only voting bloc that really matters in national politics is the White vote. This isn’t an overstatement. The reason for this is that the non-White blocs have largely calcified and are no longer in play. The White voters are still an overwhelming majority of voters who actually vote and they’re more fluid in their decision-making than any other identity group. As such, even a seemingly subtle increase in White discomfort with Obama’s anti-White regime will rock the political establishment.
And what will a panicked attempt by the DNC to recoup blue-collar White voters look like? Two words: Jim Webb. Webb was in the news this week for writing an excellent editorial: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege. In it, he disembowels the logic of the regime’s anti-White policies in its own terms: equality, diversity, and class warfare. Between this and Jared’s brief appearance in the mainstream, one can’t help but feel optimistic. But my optimism is tempered by a realization that the battle for the hearts and minds of White Americans has only just begun, and Jim Webb is firmly in the enemy corner.
He’s providing a voice for the increasing frustration among White Americans for their disinheritance, and he’s perhaps the single most credible White American voice of our times. He’s a distinguished military veteran and a true badass. He’s the author of a book, Born Fighting, that portrays the White American conquest of the frontier with historical knowledge and poetic aplomb atypical of a politician. He’s thoroughly Scots-Irish, with the fiery hair and ruddy complexion to prove it. By every measure of implicit Whiteness, he sets the standard – handily trumping Sarah Palin’s grating and amateurish shtick.
At the moment, conservatives and racialists are celebrating his stand in defense of White Americans while liberals and minorities are huffing and puffing. But he’s really better understood as an enemy staking out an anti-White positions on the front-line of a battle few even recognize is taking shape. When the smoke clears after the 2010 election, Webb could well emerge from the ruins as the de facto leader of an otherwise discredited party and be ideally positioned to accept the Democratic nomination for a presidency Obama will be forced to vacate.
This is all highly speculative, and I could be totally off-base. I certainly hope I am. But if White Anxiety in America reaches a fever pitch, as it seems increasingly likely to do, there is no better man than Jim Webb to harness it, speak for it, and completely redirect it away from our pursuit of self-determination. For all of Webb’s implicit Whiteness, his basic vision is one of integration, of drinking green beer with our yellow wives and Black friends in a brown America controlled by the Cultural Marxist rainbow coalition.
Webb’s apparent pro-White advocacy is only a clever new update on the same old Southern Strategy game we’ve been snookered by for generations: mesmerizing us with implicit Whiteness, dog whistling, and symbolism while screwing us in every way that actually matters. It will take a mountain of effort to establish ourselves as the true voices in defense of White Americans. Accomplishing this will require years of thankless sacrifice and will assuredly feature both painful setbacks and times when it all seems hopeless. Time will tell which men truly deserve the support of our people and which men lack the resolve and spirit of stewardship to see our people through to victory.
Hey, we posted on this same thing minutes apart!
I think that any chinking at the anti-white monolith is bringing it down, intentionally or unintentionally. If Whites are allowed to think in terms of White interests, we won. Simple as that. The big taboo against “White interests” is the Berlin Wall of Multiculturalism. That sucker comes down, and GAME ON BABY!
Do you really think racially conscious Whites are going to look at Jim Webb and his chink wife and think he’s on our side. I don’t.
For all of his supposed Scots-Irish pride the twice divorced Jim Webb has repeatedly failed to marry a woman of similar background. He has married woman with the names Barbara Samorajczyk, Jo Ann Kruka, and Hong Le (his current wife). At least the first two were White.
Scott,
Absolutely. Furthermore, I believe many paleocons will think it. I believe many racialists will consider him a tolerable compromise. Commander Bill even endorsed Bill White, FFS. This is serious business.
Matt, You are definitely on the money; Webb is formidable figure.
Webb gave the response to one of George W Bush’s state of the union speeches many years ago, which is when he first came to my attention.
He wrote his own speech and delivered it in such a compelling manner I remember thinking “hey, this is a mainstream guy I might actually vote for…”
A dangerous man for sure.
Difficult to say he’s implicitly White when he’s married to a Mongoloid concubine and sets black Americans up as the ultimate victim and deserving of favored treatment.
Yes, he has some redeeming qualities, he perhaps is being honest and wants to be fair to White Americans, instead of shamelessly lumping us all together with no distinctions and collectively discriminating against us. Even small measures like this are surely to raise the ire of the anti-White fanatics.
It’s a question of which way White man, do we try to shift things back a little to the right or push for extreme anti-White leftism hoping the system will collapse.
For all of his supposed Scots-Irish pride the twice divorced Jim Webb has repeatedly failed to marry a woman of similar background.
Good point, as interethnic marriages have led to a dissolution of our ties to tradition and racial integrity. White is the minimal, it is not the optimal.
For most people racial and ethnic pride is limited to their own ego, it never goes beyond their own self-satisfaction. They can at the same time miscegenate happily while beating their chest about how they’re proud of their heritage. I see it time and time again, even with White nationalists.
Excellent article, Matt. Webb is an interesting character, no doubt. I’d highly recommend Born Fighting for those who haven’t read it. He’s also a rare opponent in the modern Kwa…someone you can actually respect, the genuine article.
He gets us, at least to a considerable degree. Is he sympathetic, or is he an enemy?
Matt:”But if White Anxiety in America reaches a fever pitch, as it seems increasingly likely to do, there is no better man than Jim Webb to harness it, speak for it, and completely redirect it away from our pursuit of self-determination.”
Bingo, you nailed it. Certainly, we must assume this is the case, unless future evidence proves otherwise. I respect the guy, but he should be treated as an enemy unless he embraces our quest for self-determination, which isn’t going to happen.
One thing that I haven’t seen people mention is that Webb’s thinking seems designed to break up “monolithic” white America, and get some component parts of it in on the diversity gravy train – just another grasping part of the rainbow coalition. Divide and conquer. For a whole host of reasons, I don’t think it is going to work all that well, but we need to be on guard against those who would seek to divide us and set us against one another. As white racial consciousness builds, our opponents will surely attempt to break us apart. They must not succeed.
The bottom line is that white racial consciousness is growing, and it will seek a voice. We’ve seen how white energy has been misdirected in the past, and availed us of absolutely nothing. We must not make the same mistakes again. If the emerging white voice does not demand self-determination, all will be for naught. We’ve seen this movie before, it played all during the 50’s and 60’s.
Despite the ominous potential of Webb’s approach, in the short run at least, this is all to our benefit. Just to have a respected, badass, sitting Senator write something like that is extremely helpful to our emerging movement. It sets the stage for the next act.
So let the good times roll!…but keep an eye on the long game. Radicalize, radicalize, radicalize, wherever possible.
Mark,
Difficult to say he’s implicitly White when he’s married to a Mongoloid concubine…
That’s the essence of implicit Whiteness, being married to an Eskimo and raving about being a pioneer mother, shacking up with an Asian girl and boasting of your Scotch-Irish forefathers. Implicit Whiteness is about throwing up a smokescreen of symbolism and sloganeering with words while betraying your people with your deeds.
It’s a question of which way White man, do we try to shift things back a little to the right or push for extreme anti-White leftism hoping the system will collapse.
I think this transcends the familiar Linderite “Worse is better” argument. When a tard like Glenn Beck says something pro-White to keep up with his audience, that’s progress. When the mainstream media accidentally offers up some favorable coverage of Jared Taylor, that’s progress. But a clever and systematic campaign to hijack the “White American Voice” to redirect them toward an agenda of Cultural Marxism is not progress.
White is the minimal, it is not the optimal.
I respect and understand your difference of opinion, here, and have clearly spelled out my position in previous threads in previous places. When you imply that I’m speaking in a purely racial sense, you’re deliberately distorting my position to set up a false dichotomy favorable to your perspective. I’m not pro-White, per se. I’m for a White American ethnonational identity. I believe that efforts by both Nordicists like yourself, Celtic heritage hobbyists like Jim Webb, and polemicists who speak of “the diverse European American peoples” all get in the way of what I perceive to be the imperative of rallying together as a unified people, the White American people.
We differ, and I respect your position, but please don’t mischaracterize mine.
Mark: “…he’s married to a Mongoloid concubine…”
Despite our differences, I see that we share a similar opinion regarding attorneys.
Randy, indeed, as I don’t recognize the legality of their union.
That’s the essence of implicit Whiteness, being married to an Eskimo and raving about being a pioneer mother, shacking up with an Asian girl and boasting of your Scotch-Irish forefathers. Implicit Whiteness is about throwing up a smokescreen of symbolism and sloganeering with words while betraying your people with your deeds.
There is a lot of room for interpretation I suppose, but for me implicit (implied) Whiteness is describing someone who is pro-White by their behavior and lifestyle without being explicit about it. You know, the Whites who live in all-White enclaves yet spout politically correct platitudes. If someone is married to a non-White and advocates for diversity I don’t see how they are implicitly White (pro-White). I see the man as rather just self-serving and a hypocrite. His Whiteness begins and ends with himself.
I respect and understand your difference of opinion, here, and have clearly spelled out my position in previous threads in previous places.
I don’t believe I’ve distorted anything you’ve said, I am expressing my opinion and as I see it part of the problem. As White now includes Jews, West Asians and hybrids. It has become too relative. It however is ingrained in the minds of our people and useful to a point, but not without clarification.
You made some good points in your post and it’s well-written, certainly better than the other copy-and-paste job on the same topic.
Well, we all know what jews promised to do if a White Leader will rise among us. Should i say more?
Webb may be trying to position himself for a run at the presidency. If Obama’s Democratic Party is perceived as anti-white by too many whites, along comes Jim Webb to get out on a limb for white folks. He’s the anti-Obama in the Democratic Party. Electoral success ensues, or at least that is the plan. But it won’t be in 2012. There is nothing poll-related that would cause Obama to step aside. Even if he dropped as low in the polls as GWB, any pressure on him to step down would prompt cries of racism. Unless there is some kind of weird scandal, he will be running next time. Of course, if he loses it will be blamed on white racism.
If he is going to be the Great White Hope in 2012, he’s got to offer more than a single speech. He’s got to say what his actual policies will be on race and immigration, and he’ll have to say these things in a racially charged political climate. His every word might be challenged by our side, or the traitors, or both.
I visited a site, democratunderground, today, and was struck by how many posters there were shrieking that discrimination against Whites doesn’t exist. If this discussion comes out in the open, that position will no longer be tenable. The usual way for the Jew’s media to recognize facts that they’ve always denied or ignored is to make some small mention, and move on to other things. The false belief remains among the millions who missed the notice on the bottom of page nine. But I don’t know if the Oops, Someone Inadvertently Made An Error trick will work. The cat has popped its head out of the bag.
That would be a stroke of genius but I don’t think the White hating Jews who control the Democratic party could stomach it. They hate White Americans, especially what they contemptuously refer to as the “NASCAR crowd”, and to even hint at anything that would help those despised goyim sets off a Jew meltdown worthy of a holocaust memorial.
How did he vote on that recent “financial overhaul” bill?
Why would he write something like that, after voting completely to the contrary?
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=2&vote=00207
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/financial-reform-quotas-millions-business-taxes-banks-reid-biden-obama/2010/07/15/id/364795
Typical politician. I hope Washington burns first.
For.
http://www.wset.com/news/stories/0510/738521.html
But he voted for TARP so he’s a Wall Street whore.
“How did he vote….”. The scam passed via the usual pre-arranged, rigged vote. So who cares. Personally, I don’t regard Webb’s Asian wife as a major disqualification. In fact, I intend to accord Asians the probationary status of Honorary Aryan when push comes to shove; we’ll see what they do. And we need allies – esp. smart ones – given all the millions of Jew- brainwashed, bought-off whites who’ll be on the other side of the fight. Remember the Asian guy who did the Racist Cat video? Absolutely inspired. I’ll take a few (million) of his type on our side.
CompassionateFascist,
It’s your prerogative to be completely aracial, to be a globalist instead of a nationalist, and to be so anti-Semitic that you would deprive them of Israel. What’s not cool is the deception you regularly engage in, leading people to believe that you’re one of us for days and weeks on end, then slipping in that East Asians and even Blacks can be “Honorary Aryans” if they help you with your Jew thing and other stuff that’s COMPLETELY antithetical to what this site and the clear majority of its readers are about.
To be an ethnic nationalist does not entail that one is against other races. That’s the old false dichotomy this movement has suffered under for too long, and you’re perpetuating it. I think Asians are dandy. I admire a lot of things about them. But they’re not my people. It doesn’t mean we can’t be allies. We’re the natural allies of ethnic nationalist movements the world over.
I admire Japan and think there’s a lot about it to be emulated, but this relationship needn’t be one in which I’m an “Honorary Jap” or they’re “Honorary White Americans”. That would just be stupid.
Matt, great story. I don’t trust Webb either. Our “leader” will come out of nowhere. He will not be a “typical” politician like Webb.
Also, it’s Scots-Irish. Scotch is just for drinking (and tape, too).
Joanne,
When our leader comes around, I look forward to becoming an instrument in the service of his will.
I repaired the Scotch/Scots thing in the post.
But my optimism is tempered by a realization that the battle for the hearts and minds of White Americans has only just begun, and Jim Webb is firmly in the enemy corner.
…
This is all highly speculative, and I could be totally off-base. I certainly hope I am. But if White Anxiety in America reaches a fever pitch, as it seems increasingly likely to do, there is no better man than Jim Webb to harness it, speak for it, and completely redirect it away from our pursuit of self-determination.
…
Webb’s apparent pro-White advocacy is only a clever new update on the same old Southern Strategy game we’ve been snookered by for generations: mesmerizing us with implicit Whiteness, dog whistling, and symbolism while screwing us in every way that actually matters. @Matt
Matt, great story. I don’t trust Webb either. Our “leader” will come out of nowhere. He will not be a “typical” politician like Webb. @Joanne Dee
First let me start off by saying that this has to be one of the most intriguing articles that I have ever read regarding the Machiavellian nature and strategy on how the System treats White Americans and their legitimate interests and grievances within that System.
An absolutely first-rate level of discernment on your part, Mr. Parrott.
However, I hope that all you say regarding Mr. Webb does not indeed come into fruition. Webb is in so many ways a man worthy of respect — not only since he was the most highly decorated Marine officer during the Vietnam War (compared to the other schlock pols who, routinely, got deferments or did the “weekend warrior” thing with their local Guard unit) — but the fact that when he was Secretary of the Navy under Reagan he was, if I remember correctly, often critical of Israel and stood up for American interests over Israeli interests.
Again, fantastic article, Matt.
I reread Webb’s article and don’t see anything I disagree with. It was very heartening to read.
This statement for instance:
” But the extrapolation of this logic to all “people of color”—especially since 1965, when new immigration laws dramatically altered the demographic makeup of the U.S.—moved affirmative action away from remediation and toward discrimination, this time against whites”
To me it seems Webb is simply trying to limit any claim to American benefits to American blacks whose ancestors were slaves. That we as Americans owe nothing to any other racial immigrant group. Without these benefits there is no incentive for them to be here and they will leave. In other words non whites and immigrants can be cut off now, American blacks will have to be weaned off more slowly.
We have to deal with reality and Webb as a politician must work within the system as it is now. His article is not pro-white as much as he is pointing out how the system is anti-white, a step in the right direction and my feeling is we should not write off anyone who comes to our defense but take advantage of allies especially in DC.
I also do not discount Webb because his wife is asian. I have noticed many white men, especially military men, seem to prefer asian women.
Again, we have to deal with reality. What are whites who already have mixed race families supposed to do? Dump their wives and children? Should we just write them all off?
Matt Parrott, when you said this:
“…rallying together as a unified people, the White American people.” Do you mean jews too?
Soso,
Yes. We should just write them all off. It doesn’t have to be in a hateful or disrespectful way. But those who marry non-Whites and/or have non-White children have opted out of our ethnic group, which is partially defined by biological race. If he wants to be supportive of Whites, that’s great. I appreciate his article in the WSJ. What I’m warning against is the threat of him “hijacking the White voice”, which we must be wary of due to his Cosmic vision for not only his private family, but for the entire country.
I say “partial” as a segue into your next question. I sidestep the question of whether Jews are White with the assertion that it’s irrelevant. To be Jewish is to be a member of a separate tribe, a different nation. Jews are not “White Americans”. They’re “Jewish”. They speak fluent English and appear to be us, but this is truly not the case. They have a different past and a different future from us. When they think “my people”, I’m not in their thoughts. Their vision for what their country should be like is dramatically different from our White American vision.
Nearly every other White population that has come to this country has merged into the unified cultural matrix of the White American nationality. That is what must not be divided. Jews have set themselves apart, and consider themselves to be a separate and distinct people. While they prefer to maintain an environment of confusion and indifference on this National Question, their record in this country is clear – and it’s one of people who act as a nation within a nation.
We have a moral obligation to stand behind this determination, regardless of how much stigma is associated with it. Our failure to recognize and react to this is the singular reason why our citizen soldiers are dying in both Iraq and Afghanistan right now. While we civilians aren’t in their position to demonstrate physical courage, we owe it to them to demonstrate social courage in staying firm and resolute on this question. For them to take a bullet for us when we’re too craven to tolerate critique for them is indefensible.
Mr. Parrott, what is your White American vision and what is the White American ethnonational identity?
Few White Americans view themselves as members of the White American nationality. Presumably your objective is to encourage them to adopt such an identity. If a Scotch-Irish American, German American, Italian American, Irish American, Portuguese American, Polish American, Greek American, Russian American, and Serbian American can all melt into the White American ethnonational identity, why can’t a Jewish American?
Many Irish Americans, German Americans, Scotch-Irish Americans, and Italian Americans identify with their ethnic heritage. Presumably you want them to give up their ethnic identity and view themselves only as members of the White American people. Would you exclude Irish Americans, German Americans, Scots-Irish Americans, and Italian Americans who wish to maintain their ethnic identity from your White American ethnonational identity like you exclude Jewish Americans?
What about Jewish Americans who don’t identify as Jews? What do you say to Jews who convert to Christianity, consider themselves White Americans, and don’t identify as Jewish? Do you consider them part of the White American people?
Matt Parrott: I agree, write the White miscegenators off. Let them go to China or Mexico or Africa and make their lives there. We have been damaged enough. The multi-cults have had their chance, and all they’ve done is destroy our nation. We’ll have to build a new nation, and the last thing we need is a cup of the poison that has brought us down. Sorry about the little ones who did not choose their parents, but we need to put our own children ahead of alien children.
First off, Jim Webb didn’t disembowel anything. White unemployment and underemployment is due the fact that many white males are increasingly not competitive in the global marketplace, not due to Affirmative Action or diversity programs. The jobs have been shipped overseas where the job often can be done with more technical expertise and more cheaply, not because a Black man took a White mans job, as if the White man in question were somehow entitled to it. Race has been used as a scapegoat in different forms from decade to decade. Even with White hubris however, it is becoming harder for Whites to deny the power shift revealing that other cultures just may be becoming more competitive. It is more lazy and easy to blame it on Blacks and/or Latinos taking your jobs-data be damned. An African man just brought Britian’s second largest airport, Gatwick. Is this because of diversity programs too? Im sure you love that one.
Of course Webb is using the brew of race to garner the White male vote in particular. Malcolm X called them “Dixiecrats”. We are quite familiar with this strategy-nothing new. In an election year, the actual data and facts are usually casualties. However, given the unmasking of the usual strategies a la Brietbart and others in the Sherrod case, it will be interesting to see what will unfold. The usual race-based strategies that captivate the consciousness of some in the white community may not be as effective, despite irrational white angst. It is true however, that there is a rise in the White consciousness you claim, however this will not solve your issues. Your analysis of Webb is right in other respects: The “Blackphobia” tactic will be used by both parties, however this may have some unintended consequences that you have not identified.
Two more things: Your desired Southern White territory is not going to happen. Also, you may also want to study the history of the Grimaldi people before being so quick to talk about pure “White” Scot-Irish blood. That counts for all of early Brittany.
test to see if this how to get things in italics. Second test \i getting things\i into italics. Third test /i italics /i done.
Bob, use the “greater than” and “less than” symbols for italics tags.
Remove the spaces from the examples below:
to begin italics
to end italics
Bob, I just realized that adding extra spaces in the examples above still didn’t display them properly. Remove the underscores ( _ ) from the examples below.
to begin italics
to end italics
Bob, my second example didn’t come out right either. The tag parsing must be pretty aggressive.
Last time…
To begin italics: “less than symbol”, letter “i”, “greater than symbol”
To end italics: “less than symbol”, forward slash, letter “i”, “greater than symbol”
For those with a gripe with our least favorite white tribe, read his book “Fields of Fire”, the villians in the ending are Shloshsteins.
I believe the purpose of Webb’s editorial is to convince whites that the Democrats can get things right on race and to keep white fence sitters in the fold for the mid term elections. The Democrats are facing disaster in November due in large part to the anti-white bias of Obama and top officials, so Webb is dutifully playing the part of pale face emissary to assure us that we’re not forgotten. Lest anyone think he’s some kind of maverick keep in mind that he wasn’t rebuked by Obama or any Democrats for his Buchananesque WSJ article.
Americans are suckers for military veterans turned politicians and assume this type of pedigree bespeaks character. To the best of my knowledge Jim Webb has no history of opposing affirmative action programs, racial set asides and our anti-white immigration policies. Why the sudden turnabout and can he really be trusted?
Maybe Jim Webb is sincere in his convictions, but given how we’ve been set up and knocked down by system politicos in the past I have my doubts.
Well reasoned and well said, Mr. Dithers.
Thanks for your replies, Matt and Discard. I appreciate what you wrote and am still considering it.
“…keep in mind that he wasn’t rebuked by Obama or any Democrats for his Buchananesque WSJ article.”
Mr. Dithers, They can’t refute the article so they will try to ignore it and shove it down the memory hole as quickly and quietly as possible.
I agree we need to be cautious about Webb. He’s on everyone’s radar screen now. When asked about the article, Webb’s spokesperson said he had no comment, that the article speaks for itself. I take that as affirmation he stands by what he said. No apologies, no explaining, no backing up. Badass indeed.
Please read this article about the anti-white anti-male financial regulation bill. The coming quota tsunami.
http://discriminations.us/2010/07/the_coming_quota_tsunami.html
I agree with soso that the Regime wants this to go down the memory hole as quickly as possible, because there really is no defense of affirmative action for Armenians, as is done in some places in California. Let’s hope that the Limbaughs and Hannitys keep it on the conservative radar screen.
Original Man,
>>The jobs have been shipped overseas where the job often can be done with more technical expertise and more cheaply…<<
Cheaply, because they don't give a damn about working or environmental conditions and pay their worker's only enough for them to get by, and sometimes not even that much. Not to mention they bought the White man's machines which they couldn't have created* on their own.
Those who promote globalization, or are indifferent to it, are not honest about how it really works. A nation's economy is meant to serve not just the owner/employer but the people of the nation itself. Globalization only benefits the owner, and the politicians s/he's bought off.
Note: I said 'create', not manufacture.
If you want to see how quickly the Multicult will turn on its own, please look at the comments associated with Webb’s Wall Street Journal article.
To summarize, Webb is, as described by the Thought Police…
A liar.
A phony moderate with the guts to tell the truth
Uneducated and ignorant of the many benefits of Affirmative Action
A traitor to his principles
A hero to his redneck base
Soon to be ex-senator from Virginia
Posturing for his next election campaign – for the presidency
In other words, He pissed-off a lot of his fellow travelers. It seems to me a national level politician would not do this unless there were an ulterior strategy at play. Not that these guys are perfect, but they do understand survival.
This makes me think the tide has not only turned but grown quite strong.
Randy Garver, on italics. Thanks for the info. Yes, software does seem to be getting more aggressive.
“The injustices endured by black Americans at the hands of their own government have no parallel in our history, not only during the period of slavery but also in the Jim Crow era that followed.”
They were slaves and not all of them were treated badly. This has been well documented but the Jew media hides these facts. Ditto with the mayhem the Jews and other liberals played during the civil rights movement down South (going down to Alabama and having black males/northern white females copulate on courthouse steps or blacks and northern whites urinating in the streets of Montgomery).
The blacks here are far better off than the descendents of the ones that returned to Africa (Liberia) or the descendents of the ones that remained in Africa.
“Beyond our continuing obligation to assist those African-Americans still in need, government-directed diversity programs should end.”
What continuing obligation? You mean Dems for the black vote! I don’t believe any non-elite, white Americans owe black Americans anything. White Americans have more than paid their share of sacrifices! At this point blacks need to elevate themselves on their own. What is this constant need for white help anyway?
The only white American Webb is looking out for is himself. Read between the lines. He is probably a front man for the Dems looking to retain power. Most politicians are whores and always have been. We already know they aren’t even good Americans.
“First off, Jim Webb didn’t disembowel anything. White unemployment and underemployment is due the fact that many white males are increasingly not competitive in the global marketplace, not due to Affirmative Action or diversity programs.”
If you add White Men being discriminated because they’re White to White Men being discriminated against because they’re men, it adds up to a whole lot of discrimination.
I really think that if it wasn’t for affirmative action for women, we’d have something very close to full employment for males in this Country, in spite of the issues with free trade and the rising economic power of formally poor Countries.
Firstly, Matt, you really have been knocking them out of the park, not just with the original article but in the comments as well.
As for Webb, my guess – and it is obviously simply a guess – is that he is conflicted on race. You can’t read Born Fighting without coming to the conclusion that he feels a strong attachment to the Scots-Irish, and very likely American whites in general, working class whites in particular. On a certain level, he gets it.
On the other hand, there is considerable truth in the old adage that “Where you stand depends on where you sit.” The reality is that he is a miscegenator and a Democrat in the Age of Obama. As others have noted, this does not mean that he can have no racial attachments. He can. But it does mean that it is highly unlikely that we would support a meaningful solution to the extistential crisis that whites face. He gets it, but he is not on our side. In a very fundamental sense, he can’t be on our side.
I don’t see his article as a dishonest ploy to obfuscate and manipulate. Obviously, that may be all there is to it, but given the track record of his life, I don’t feel justified in drawing such a conclusion. Webb is the real deal, but a largely conflicted real deal. In other words, he probably does have some lingering racial consciousness, but in the end he will likely take the approach of just “looking out for whites” within the context of the Rainbow Nation. Make sure his people get a fair shake, that sort of thing – while still sitting back and allowing those same whites to be dispossessed, reduced to minority status, and so forth. Some fair shake!
This is one of the approaches that I expect the establishment to take in order to divert and misdirect growing white racial consciousness – express outrage on behalf of whites, and insist that they be included as equal partners in the diversity coalition. We want in too! Right is right!
Acceptance of this approach will of course lead to nothing but disaster for whites, and will not solve any of their fundamental problems. But it could be a very appealing line for the System, if done properly. Give the white a sip of water, for which he will be grateful, while continuing to maim him. What a deal.
Another approach, which I mentioned above, is playing on white divisions (Scots-Irish versus the elites, northern whites versus southern, and so forth).
The System will attempt to obfuscate the real issues and misdirect growing white energy in any way it can. The more erudite members of the System are well aware that it is possible to do this. The System weathered a massive level of white energy in the 50’s and 60’s, because whites did not develop a coherent vision and a clear objective that could have seen them through to an enduring victory. Obviously, the System expects to pull off a repeat performance. It’s our job to make sure that the result is different at this time.
Moving beyond mere guesswork and the questioning of Webb’s motives, the main point is that white racial consciousness is rising. Webb’s article is both a symptom of that rising tide, and an indicator of how the System plans to manage it. Again, it’s our job to get a different result this time. That’s the take away.
Apologies for the typos above. I hit send too early.
Matt Parrott: I sidestep the question of whether Jews are White with the assertion that it’s irrelevant. To be Jewish is to be a member of a separate tribe, a different nation. Jews are not “White Americans”. They’re “Jewish”.
Nearly every other White population that has come to this country has merged into the unified cultural matrix of the White American nationality. That is what must not be divided. Jews have set themselves apart
Talk about being coy. You’re implying they are White, so just say it. You’re fine with Jewish assimilation.
Original Man: When there were still jobs aplenty for working class men, race quotas were merely an irritant. Nowadays, every affirmative action job is food stolen from a White Man’s children.
Discard,
THe commenter “original man” is an anti-white dirtbag. No need to debate such a creature.
Original Man, do you have a single original thought? Or do you simply get paid by the platitude?
Still, I’ll play.
Original “man”: “White unemployment and underemployment is due the fact that many white males are increasingly not competitive in the global marketplace, not due to Affirmative Action or diversity programs.”
Come on. Affirmative action has created an artificial black middle class. I say artificial, because were it not for affirmative action, most of the black middle class would not exist. Look at university admissions. Were it not for affirmative action, there would be virtually NO admissions of blacks at competitive colleges. Almost none. Your people simply don’t meet the standards that others have to meet. This isn’t a matter of opinion, it is a matter of math.
Blacks are also massively overrepresented in government jobs, typically exceeding their percentage of the population many time over. Add in all sorts of government set asides, private sector hires for diversity purposes, etc., and yes, that’s a lot of whites who were denied middle class jobs. Look at the data Yggdrasil put together here: http://www.whitenationalism.com/div/Diversity.html
As far as not being competitive in the global marketplace, there is considerable truth to this, though not in the way that you mean. It’s hard to compete with slave labor. It’s even harder to be productive in a society that values debt over productivity, short run gains over long term productivity.
But really, this is all beside the point, isn’t it? We’re not interested in figuring out how to best live with you. Besides, your type is immune to reason. Despite demonstrable and provable evidence that your people are promoted above their talents, you will always be convinced that you achieved it by merit. The black that gets into Harvard with a barely above average SAT? He earned it. The white who didn’t get in, despite have a through the roof score? Well, he didn’t earn it. Well, obviously, they didn’t earn it. It’s just the way you think (or should I say the way you don’t think at all). It’s what you are.
At the end of the day, it’s yet another reason that you aren’t us. That’s really the point, isn’t it? You’re not us. We want our own land, our own country. We have no interest in lording it over the likes of you, and certainly no interest in being lorded over. The highest level of training that most of you are capable of is that of Holy Platitude Spouter. Color me not impressed.
Original “man”: “Malcolm X called them “Dixiecrats”.
LOL! If you are suffering from the delusion that Malcom X coined the term, you are even more ignorant than I thought. Clearly, you have more edumacation ahead of you. Since you are seemingly of fair to middling intelligence, you’ve got a damn good shot at Harvard! Chop chop!
Original “man”: “The usual race-based strategies that captivate the consciousness of some in the white community may not be as effective, despite irrational white angst.”
I give any reader or lurker Exhibit A of why we wish to be separated from such a repugnant creature as Orginal “man.” Tens of thousands of black on white rapes a year? That’s just white “angst.” The murders? Ditto. Whites objecting to being raped and butchered in enormous numbers is completely irrational, according to this kindly black. Who would not wish him to be included in the body politic? He’s so wonderful and nice! He reminds me of the saintly Morgan Freeman.
Platitude Spouter, your people have been nothing but a blight upon us. We wish to separate from your kind, and we will. Since we are so evil, no doubt you will flourish once freed of our terrible company. It will be a win/win.
Yet there is one matter that’s going to stick in your craw, though you won’t admit it. We’re going to win this thing, but IF we lost, it certainly wouldn’t be because of the likes of you. It will take actual, fully developed humans to prevent our success. You exist purely upon the sufferance of those who, while they may hate us, most certainly despise you. Like the circus animal that you are, they teach you to spout your platitudes over the white man’s technology that you peck upon. Were it not for them, you wouldn’t be pecking on a keyboard, but turning over rocks looking for worms – your next meal. So think (if you are even capable of it) about why that is, Platitude Spouter.
Did it again. Apologies for the total lack of editing.
Mark,
The argument against Jewish inclusion based on tribe, identity, and nationality is simple and persuasive. The argument against Jewish inclusion based on biological non-Whiteness is awkward. Even purely Jewish Jews are the closest non-Whites to Whites of any group. This is obfuscated further by the many European Jews who’ve taken on the Nordic phenotype. An argument can be made that a blond-haired blue-eyed man who was raised as a Christian is non-White since his dad was a secular Jew, but at best it’s complex and unpersuasive.
I’m generally opposed to considering Jews “White”, but I believe that the threat of the Jewish oligarchy is existential and the threat of Jewish admixture is negligible. If all the non-Jewish people with substantial Jewish ancestry came to our side (and I’m not asking them to), it would be a drop in the bucket compared to other threats to our biological heritage.