White America
It has been called an “earthquake” or a “tsunami” by various political pundits. I don’t like either of these natural disaster metaphors. An earthquake is a rare event that leaves nothing but destruction in its wake. A tsunami quickly recedes, creates enormous temporary havoc, but leaves the contours of the natural landscape relatively unscathed.
The 2010 midterm elections can be more accurately described as an “avalanche.” The White vote was unquestionably the cause of the burial of Heartland Democrats we saw on Tuesday. Non-White turnout was down 4 percent. As I predicted, youth turnout was down 8 percent from 2008. In contrast, the White vote in the House went a record 60 percent for Republicans, a 13 percent swing from 2008, with White working class voters (most of them in the Midwest) going Republican by an incredible 29 percent.
Like an avalanche, the consequences of the midterm elections will stick for a decade because of the census and redistricting. In the South, the 2010 midterm election was a realignment election like 1994, which saw the demise of veteran incumbents like Ike Skelton of Missouri, Chet Edwards of Texas, John Spratt of South Carolina, and Gene Taylor of Mississippi, not to mention the historic Republican capture of state legislatures in Alabama, Tennessee, and North Carolina.
Those seats won’t be competitive in the future.
In the Midwest, which is losing congressional seats, redistricting will be even more important. Republicans won the governorships of Pennsylvania, Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin. They came within 1% of winning the governorships of Illinois and Minnesota. They already control the governorship of Indiana.
At the state level, the election is even more revealing: Republicans captured 14 state house chambers and have unified control over 26 state legislatures many of which are in the South and Midwest. They picked up 680 state legislature seats which is more than the Democrats picked up after Watergate.
Far from being a loser, the Sailer Strategy (which Republicans only indirectly benefited from) just handed the GOP its biggest victory in the lifetime of Republican political analysts. It was the biggest Republican victory since the backlash against FDR in the Great Depression.
Cui bono
Who benefits?
“I’m not sure there has been a Congress since 1924 — and certainly not in the last 50 years — that had a membership more interested in reductions in overall illegal and legal immigration than will be the one that was elected yesterday.”
The most restrictionist Congress since 1924. Doesn’t that really say it all?
IN THE HOUSE
1. They wiped out a net of three dozen More-Immigration seats in the House.
2. They knocked the number of More-Immigration seats down to about 170, far below the 218 majority needed to pass legislation, seemingly eradicating any possibility of “comprehensive immigration reform” being considered in the next Congress.
3. They didn’t just go for mild enforcement types. They filled about two dozen of those current More-Immigration seats with Less-Immigration candidates who made explicit promises not only to push stringent enforcement measures but also promised to work to eliminate several categories of legal immigration.
4. The number of elected Less-Immigration candidates promising stepped-up immigration enforcement looks like it will fall just short of the 218 majority. But most of the final 50 elected candidates classified as Uncommitted appear likely to lean toward more enforcement if presented opportunities and requirements to vote on it. There is no question that a solid pro-enforcement, bi-partisan majority will exist in the new House.
IN THE SENATE1. Five or six of the Senate’s most aggressive More-Immigration Members were replaced by Less-Immigration candidates.
2. That shift puts the More-Immigration bloc about 10 votes short of stopping a filibuster and creates a virtual 50-50 deadlock in the Senate.
This was a victory for us. It wasn’t a total victory, or a pretty victory, but it was a victory nonetheless. It is a foundation that we can build upon. In 2012, we have a real shot at putting a restrictionist in the White House and restrictionists taking over the Senate.
Within the next ten years, it is conceivable that we could secure the border, start deporting illegal aliens, and take advantage of hard economic times to end legal immigration. In the meantime, this guy will be in charge of the House immigration subcommittee.
Disappointments
The three big letdowns of Tuesday night need to be addressed: Angle in Nevada, Tancredo in Colorado, and Manchin in West Virginia.
First, Sharron Angle lost in Nevada because 65 percent of ballots were cast before election day when Reid was ahead in the race. The Hispanic vote rose from a paltry 12 percent to 15 percent. According to the CNN exit polls, the Hispanic vote in Nevada broke only 68 percent for Reid, which is about the national average.
In Arizona, Jan Brewer was comfortably reelected with 71 percent of the Hispanic vote going for Goddard, with Hispanics 14 percent of the Arizona electorate. Mike Lee and Rick Perry won in Utah and Texas with similar demographics.
Angle had a 4 point lead heading into the election. Even Reid’s own supporters expected him to lose. Angle lost by 5 points because she waited too late to go hard on immigration which surged her ahead in the last week of the race. The Nevada Senate race had already been decided by that point because of the early ballots and Angle’s unwise repeated comments on privatizing Social Security.
If everyone in Nevada had voted on Nov. 2, Angle would have won easily.
Second, Tancredo lost in Colorado because of the dysfunctional Colorado GOP, not in his own right. Maes carried 11 percent of the Colorado vote. The polls which showed that Tancredo had closed on the eve the election proved inaccurate.
The culprit in Colorado was also early voting. Maes performed better than expected because so many ballots had already been cast. In Colorado, 12 percent of voters in 2010 were Hispanic. Tancredo lost because Maes peeled off enough of the White vote (12 percent) to put Hickenlooper over the top.
Third, John Raese was trounced by Joe Manchin because he was a perennial candidate who made a terrible gaffe that cost him the election. After surging ahead in the West Virginia Senate race, John Raese was stupid enough to endorse the ludicrous idea of repealing the minimum wage, in an economically distressed state with more White working class voters than any other in the Union.
Joe Manchin, a popular governor, ran to the right of his opponent and did everything but shoot a target of Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama to get elected. A better candidate would have beat Manchin in the midterm elections. We will get another chance in 2012.
Forest/Trees
It is important not to miss the forest for the trees here. As Roy Beck points out, a few big names fell (Tancredo and Angle), but the net gain in Congress (Boozman and Barletta), and especially in the governorships (Deal and Scott) and state legislatures (Alabama and Tennessee) are a positive net for us. Next year, a whole slew of states (including my own, not to mention its neighbors) will attempt to pass Arizona-style immigration reform.
The White vote is coalescing. In Arizona and Oklahoma, implicit Whites are getting bolder and are symbolically striking out (this is several election cycles in a row) at “affirmative action” and “sharia law.” The whole South is on fire with restrictionist sentiment. The Midwest is tilting into the Heartland column. And most importantly, the hackneyed charge of “racism” has less sting than at any other point in recent memory.
If Obama wants to win a second term as president, he will have to win Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. His approval rating is underwater in every swing state he won in 2008 and even in states like Wisconsin, Connecticut, and Maine. With the total collapse of his support among White voters, an economy sinking into depression, and without a legislative record to inspire his non-White base supporters, Obama will likely be a one term president.
The map ahead of us is looking better, not worse.
Well it’s easy to beat a man with an abstraction. But the GOP will have to eventually run an actual candidate, and then Barry Obama will start looking better.
The last GOP primary showed the deep divides in the party. These don’t come into play much in the midterms. Each state nominates the type of GOP candidate they prefer.
Recall the 3 way split between Huckabee (choice of the Bible Belt), Romney (choice of the Mormons and midwest conservatives) and McCain (choice of the hawks, neo-cons and Rockefeller Republicans).
The only candidates that get into double digits in favorability ratings for the GOP today are Huckabee: 21%, Romney: 20%, Palin: 15% and Newt: 14%. Ron Paul (another factoin leader) is the highest of the single digit candidates.
Romney and Huckabee both beat Obama nicely in one on one theoretical matchups, Palin loses pretty convincingly.
Sure, we’re just getting started but recent history says unknowns don’t win in their first run, so no matter who superior someone like Thune or Pawlenty maybe it’s probably one of those names above that will be the GOP nominee, at which point Barry’s odds of holding for the second term start looking a lot better.
I think I would rather another 4 years of Obama misrule than having that idiot Huckabee doing the same things in the name of the GOP and Christianity. Ugh!
Barack Hussein Obama won’t win a single Southern state. I’m confident he will lose Florida, Virginia, and North Carolina. The others aren’t even in the realm of possibility.
Jackson says:
November 4, 2010 at 8:21 pm
Recall the 3 way split between Huckabee (choice of the Bible Belt), Romney (choice of the Mormons and midwest conservatives) and McCain (choice of the hawks, neo-cons and Rockefeller Republicans).
The only candidates that get into double digits in favorability ratings for the GOP today are Huckabee: 21%, Romney: 20%, Palin: 15% and Newt: 14%. Ron Paul (another factoin leader) is the highest of the single digit candidates.
JR Replies: Yes, a terrible split last time. Bible belt Protestant Christian Zionists are real election killers now for the GOP. They’ll probably be some attempt to put up a “Unifier” like the 2nd Bush son ex Florida Governor married to the Mexican.
I think OD should have a policy of not discussing Presidential politics as it is too depressing, too divisive
Browsing this article at Alt Right:
http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/district-of-corruption/white-america-s-last-bender/
If demographics were such a deciding factor, why did Raul Grijalva and Giffords in Arizona almost go down? What do you suppose their districts will look like once Jan Brewer and the Republican legislature get their way?
We should be in terrible shape in Alabama. We have one of the largest non-White populations in America. Yet Tuesday was an overwhelming victory for Whites in Georgia, South Carolina, Texas, Alabama, Tennessee, Mississippi, Florida, and Virginia.
Admittedly, we have to do something about the Voting Rights Act. That should be repealed. We’re in better shape here though – politically speaking – than Washington or Oregon.
If real unemployment (not exactly as reported by the BLS) stays high, he is likely a one term useful idiot for our cause. Isn’t it nice to have a socialist/marxist useful idiot working for whitey for a change? I wonder, what the h_ll did Soros and his ilk really think would happen when Barry Soetoro took over the reigns of power?
@Hunter: a Huckabee video ALL Republicans should watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pLOC4krZI4
I’m sorry that I can’t find one in which he calls Arkansans “selfish” for not wanting the children of illegals to get in-state college tuition rates.
From the Telegraph, based on the CNN polls mentioned in my previous posting: Obama would lose to Huckabee or Romney.
Hunter: Admittedly, we have to do something about the Voting Rights Act. That should be repealed. Huh? I know there are some strange rules in the South like redistricting being reviewed by the DOJ that should be done away with. But the Act itself (as opposed to the court meddling done using it) is probably here to stay. I can’t see a campaign to re-introduce literacy tests as a voting qualification being a big vote-getter, even in Alabama or Mississippi. (especially in Mississippi !)
And then Hunter takes this jab at me (oh, the indignity of the truth): We’re in better shape here though – politically speaking – than Washington or Oregon.
Yes you have a black minority we have a retarded liberal majority. You can all get together and outvote your minority, there are not enough sane people to outvote the ‘tards in the PNW.
This is one reason I have trouble with HACs ideas. Even if you removed every black from Oregon (all 35,000) you’d still have a state that was full of liberals. Why bother? If you really wanted to fix this place throug exclusion you’d need to start with the people who have broken it: which is the liberal majority, their elites, and their power structure – not the minorities.
Anyway, it’s better news than it looks at first glance. Both houses of the Oregon legislature went from Dem super-majorities to exactly tied. Oregon is now officially “the gridlock state”.
In Washington we replaced some Dem House memebers with GOP’ers. We voted down a state income tax decisevly, and we voted to allow dangerous criminals to be denied bail overwhelmingly.
The White backlash and avalanche has different forms in different regions. Voting against more taxes is implicitly telling the parasites there is nothing more for them here.
And, we still don’t know who won our US Senate race, thought Murry is leading. The GOP also picked up seats in the state House and Senate:
The numbers keep changing but Washington Democrats are still holding onto a 55-43 majority in the House and 27-22 edge in the Senate after Tuesday’s vote. If that outcome holds up it means a loss of six Democratic seats in the House and four in the Senate – and counting.
A number of races remain very close and could conceivably switch to the Republican side by the week’s end.
Read more: The Olympian
Maxsnafu: I seriously doubt anyone reading this site has any love for Huckabee. Locally he’s infamous for pardoning a convicted killer (who did a “I believe in Jesus” act to gain the Gov’s pardon) who came to Washington’s Pierce County and killed four White police (one a woman) in cold blood as they were eating breakfast one morning.
He is a weak man with no willpower. Look at his weight fluxuations.
Jackson,
1.) For some reason, I thought you lived in Virginia.
2.) I think gutting the Justice Department is feasible. The 14th Amendment was still in effect during Jim Crow.
John Boozman won the Arkansas Senate seat. He is a restrictionist on immigration.
I’m just wondering since the election is over are you planning on returning to actual White Nationalist articles or is this a 24/7 GOP thing now? I’ve already seen pieces on “good” Jews so can we expect to see exposes on Thomas Sowell and Alan Keyes? An article praising the Log Cabin Republicans as the hidden White Nationalists or perhaps the necessity of bombing Iranian nuclear sites on behalf of the KKK?
What the hell is wrong with Oregon and Washington? I have never been to the Pacific Northwest. Isn’t it a huge SWPL population on the Pacific Coast? Cities like Seattle and Portland are associated with liberalism around here.
Alex,
1.) The title of the “Good Jews” thread was facetious.
2.) Did you not see the two Tim Wise articles?
3.) I plan to continue to write about White America which is not necessarily synonymous with WN radical vanguardists.
4.) I’m going to continue to support candidates who are strong on immigration. It just so happens that the vast majority of them are Republicans.
Tancredo ran on the Constitution Party ticket. Did you see me endorsing Dan Maes? I endorsed Minnick in the Idaho House race.
5.) I have never supported any attack on Iran or the Log Cabin Republicans. You are making shit up now.
6.) Are you still going to clog with comments with fantasism and rhetorical posturing? Are you still going to piss on the few people who are actually serious about changing our immigration laws?
7.) Why do you care more about Iranians than securing our borders? Just exactly what are your priorities?
I think gutting the Justice Department is feasible. The 14th Amendment was still in effect during Jim Crow.
er… I don’t like it. Blacks couldn’t vote in apartheid South Africa and that ended up doing no good in the long run. What needs to happen is that the growth of the black population needs to stop. Hispanics too, obviously.
Voter supression can’t work in the long term.
I have to ask what your priorities are seeing how White America just voted in a bunch of neoconservatives and your cheering about it.
Otis,
The long term strategy is to make them so uncomfortable here that they vote with their feet and leave. By the end of Jim Crow, half of the blacks in the South had moved elsewhere. Voter suppression, a necessary transition step, is only a means to that end.
Alex is bitter that the House and Senate are better for us on immigration and that the “more immigration” candidates like Jew Russ Feingold and Jew Arlen Specter lost their reelection bids.
I’m sure he celebrated when he heard that Harry Reid had won in Nevada. That means we will have another vote on the DREAM Act in the lame duck.
This polarizing election flushed out Tim Wise and Robert Lindsay. It is also flushing out the leftist trolls pretending to be White Nationalists.
Alex is also probably mad that Iowa conservatives threw out the three “gay marriage” judges on Tuesday.
Seeing the incredibly suspicious transformation of this website and the past censoring of anything that doesn’t fall into a neocon paradime (don’t think we didn’t notice it), I’d say you know alot about trolls posing as White Nationalists. So do certain people over at Majorityrights.com.
Seeing the incredibly suspicious transformation of this website and the past censoring of anything that doesn’t fall into a neocon paradime (don’t think we didn’t notice it), I’d say you know alot about trolls posing as White Nationalists. So do certain people over at Majorityrights.com.
There is a 55+ retirement community just outside of Portland called King City. Sort of a copy of Arizona’s Sun City. There is a McDonalds there where all the old timers get together and spend the entire morning drinking Senior discount 65 cent cups of coffe with endless refills and chit chatting. My old man used to stop in there and I went by and one of the old fellas explained the history of Pacific Northwest politics. He basically said that in Seattle the Labor Unions controlled everything and had hired thugs who would deal with anyone who didn’t obey. They controlled the vote as well. He said back in the day (the guy was in his eighties so I’d guess he was talking about right after the war) there was a bar that started to sell cheap glasses of Hamms draft. Well the labor unions set the price that every bar had to charge, and one day two thugs showed up and threatened the owner about his low prices. The owner refused and the Labor Unions put a blacklist out and not a single distributor would supply the bar. Eventually he had to give in. This was well before liberalism or non-white immigration. The old guy said Seattle and Portland have long been home of very corrupt, very powerfull White Democratic Labor Union type machines that dominated the Pacific Northwest last century. All white, rural, “Hunting” type counties in the Coast Ranges vote democrat. It’s a different world there, also all the leftist types who are too poor to live in California settle in the Northwest as well. Portland’s full of hippies, but very few yuppies, not exactly a town that is full of money. When you see Portland up close it looks run down and dirty, sort of like a giant Terra Haute.
Hunter, obviously you can’t handle what I’m dishing out which is why you’ve blocked my comments.
Alex
Alex:
I hear ya…but don’t you think it a bit unproductive to dwell on something that has already been decided. At worst, White America is no dumber than it was a few years ago.
I’m not blocking your comments. They are getting sucked up by the filter.
If you have a comment in the filter, either post it again or email me about it. There is so much spam coming through the filter now that I can’t keep track of it.
We are getting upward of 100 spam comments an hour. It is too much to weed through.
I just realized that Alex is also “Dying Nation” and “Daley.”
Yes, I think Alex needs to leave us for a bit and go hang out somewhere else, better yet get off the Net and do something positive in real life.
The world isn’t all gloom and doom, lots of good things happening with White folks.
Great job to all the White Americans who worked hard for solid victories this week. Well done and isn’t it better to
WIN than always losing?!
Wow, Steve King is a Tancredo doppelganger and the best choice possible for the chairmanship of the immigration subcommittee. Definitely a good sign.
I was hoping Tancredo or Angle winning would lead to a major genocidal chimp out from someone at the Liebowitz or Maddow level but Mr Weisman’s rant was close enough.
I like having Alex around here.
His presence reminds the other commentators that the rhetorical radicals HAVE NOTHING TO SHOW for all their posturing and more-radical-than-thou chest beating. Nothing but thousands of anonymous comments that no one will ever read.
In contrast, we just put Steve King in charge of the House Immigration Subcommittee, defeated the DREAM ACT, sent Lou Barletta to Congress, put Ron Paul on the House oversight committee, knocked off two Jews in the Senate, elected the most pro-restrictionist Congress since 1924, killed “comprehensive immigration reform” for at least two years, put Rand Paul in the Senate on an “End the Fed” platform, outlawed affirmative action in Arizona, stacked the state legislatures and governorships (gerrymandering here we come) with restrictionist candidates like Nathan Deal and Jan Brewer, put the brakes on Obama’s anti-White agenda, set the stage for exposes of the Holder Justice Department, AND flushed out Jew Tim Wise as the cherry on top.
Just think about what we didn’t get: we had a shot this year at knocking off John McCain, electing Tom Tancredo Governor of Colorado, and knocking off Harry Reid in the Senate. But there will be other chances down the road.
It pains me to think that we spent so much time arguing over the efficacy of rhetorically jacking off to obscure European philosophers, most of whom have been dead for fifty years, none of whom ordinary Americans will ever read. All that wasted time over the summer could have been put to so much better use getting ready for the fall elections.
Hunter, don’t forget about all of the people who made fun of “Boots on the Ground” Denise and Annie Oakley. Two women who do more in a day than you know who ….
I’ve met Denise. She has the right approach in Pennsylvania. Time to keep pushing harder.
Denise was right. She deserves a lot of credit. I remember Denise talking about her involvement in the Tea Party long before we got involved.
I was at the Tax Day Tea Party in DC on April 15. It was becoming clear back then where this train was headed.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/04/15/district-of-corruption-crashing-the-tea-party/
Alex,
What do you have to say about this? Thanks to all those “neocons,” Ron Paul is the next chairman of the monetary policy oversight committee.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1110/Ron_Paul_in_charge_of_Federal_Reserve_oversight.html
Rush Limbaugh actually sounds pretty good for a change:
Ruling Class GOP Declare War on Country Class Conservatives
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_110410/content/01125106.guest.html
Steve King, how appropriate. I hope the pages that are being written become an historic horror novel for the anti-White brigade and their imported hordes of the third world.
As much as I mistrust and dislike Republicans, I’ll take any win- by any means. Beats depressing tales of dispossession that haunt virtually every pro-White blog and forum.
Another bit of good news: David Vitter was reelected easy here in Louisiana (this is David Duke country; when a candidate gets called a racist here, they go up in the polls not down.) Although it didn’t get a lot of attention because of Angle and Tancredo, Vitter ran an anti-immigration ad about one step above Sharron Angle’s ad. It showed tatooed Mexican gang bangers crossing the border and being welcomed by Charlie Melacon ( Vitter’s blue dog opponent). The ad portrayed Melacon as welcoming the Mexican bangers with welfare payments. The final image was a shot of Vitter standing with a White couple, stating “we’re going to take back this country.” Not as dramatic as Angle’s ad, but still pretty good.
Another funny Rush excerpt:
Is James Edwards also a rhetorical radical, HW? I find your love letters to the GOP a bit much myself.
http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/2010/08/22/republican-suicide/
What the hell is wrong with Oregon and Washington? I have never been to the Pacific Northwest. Isn’t it a huge SWPL population on the Pacific Coast? Cities like Seattle and Portland are associated with liberalism around here.
Oregon (I was born in Portland) and Washington are both divided in half socio-politically.
The Western parts are the SWPL zones.
Eastern Oregon and Eastern Washington are for all intents and purposes Red States and almost always elect Republicans. These eastern areas could easily be cut off and added on to Idaho (one of the farthest to the Right state in the Union) without missing a beat.
The reason there are so many liberals and SWPL types is that there are so few Blacks. Whites are very naive about Black nature behavior and believe everything the Jew-tube tells them.
Luckily however things are indeed looking up. Many more mestizos are streaming into the state from California, their presence is fomenting a White Backlash. (indeed their existence here, coupled with Affirmative Action policies, are what led to my own awakening to White Nationalism.) Most of us can remember back in the 1980s when everything was literally all-White, like a John Hughes flick and we strongly dislike the change that has happened within out life-times and want a White Nationalist reform.
“Is James Edwards also a rhetorical radical, HW?”
There’s a big gap between mainstream and WN but that gap can be bridged by having lots of stepping stones.
FB,
Michael Steele was widely ridiculed at the time for the “What Up” blog and the redesign of GOP.com. I’m fairly sure that I ridiculed him myself on this website. There was a really scathing review of him posted on VDARE and Takimag by Ellison Lodge.
But that was then and this is now. Steele is a laughingstock. The major reason the Left is bitching about American Crossroads and outside spending in the midterm elections is because the RNC under Michael Steele was a joke and the Tea Party organized an entire fundraising/ground level activist apparatus outside of it.
Steele is on the way out the door. I suspect he will be replaced by a popular defeated candidate from the Tea Party.
If the current GOP was anything like the Bush GOP, I wouldn’t have anything positive to say about it. If this Congress blows it like the Class of ’94, I will be the first to attack them.
It is always a mistake to fight the last war. George W. Bush isn’t in the White House anymore. John McCain was defeated. Even during the Bush administration, there were good conservatives like Jeff Session who I admired. Even during the darkest days of Bushism, the conservative base was powerful enough to defeat the Chamber of Commerce and its amnesty bills.
In general agreement with HW on working the system as best we can. But all this election did was buy us time to force more polarization. If you want to look at the future of electoral politics in America as a whole and – barring system collapse and Civil War – Tim Wise’s wet dream of White extinction, look at California, which is now well across the ethno-socialist tipping point. Solid hard left victory via a coalition of blacks, mestizos, gov’t-employed whites, cosmic libs, with Jews pulling the strings. Damn, damn lucky for us that they are going to drown in their own debt sometime before they’ll be in a position to do us in.
At this point we can still recover the White Republic better by removing political power from semi-white and self-genociding States than by secession of White States. Indeed, there is good evidence that we still live in this kind of Implicit White Republic: namely, we have long had and still have a number of majority nonwhite Territories without representation in Congress or votes for President — e.g. Guam, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia. Creating new such Territories would be a straightforward extension of what we have long been doing with complete legality and peace, as opposed to secession which would provoke much opposition or even war.
California, for example, is a good candidate for the chopping block. Democrat-controlled California will sooner or later be begging Republican-controlled Congress to bail it out. Congress should let California go bankrupt unless California agrees to convert from a State to a Territory. Meaning it loses its seats in Congress and its votes for President in exchange for a one-time bailout from the remaining United States.
With luck we can end up with California and a few other problem areas as U.S. Territories with the same legal status as Puerto Rico, Guam, and D.C. Saving the rest as an Implicit White Republic, which would slowly become more explicit as our message slowly gets out. Meanwhile, immigration and borders policy should be extended to include secure borders and severe immigration restrictions between U.S. Territories and U.S. States. We need such restrictions even with the current Territories even if we don’t make new ones.
The PRACTICAL THING to do here – listen to me, everyone – is to recover this Tim Wise fumble and run it into the endzone for a touchdown. By a touchdown, I mean ending the career of the most prominent anti-White Jew in America. The polarizing midterm election has created an opportunity for us.
Even the most deluded White leftist has elderly grandparents. Tim Wise wants their grandparents – sweet, nice old people – to die because they are White. Don’t forget that Wise is toxic and can be connected to any number of other radical anti-White Jews.
I’d say Abe Foxman or Alan Dershowitz are better contenders for the “most prominent anti-White Jew in America” title.
Hunter, I hope you understand Rush Limbaugh is just jumping on the bandwagon here. Rush spent the first 3/4 of the Bush years ignoring immigration. I remember early in Bush’s first term, Rush hanging up on people who wanted to talk about illegal immigration. I’ve been listening to Rush on and off since 1992. He likes to drop little hints here and there to suggest that he has non-PC views on things, but he never delivers the meat. His effect is to keep angry whites on the reservation.
Angle and Manchin are examples of how right-wing economic policies work against white solidarity. If the GOP is going to evolve into a pro-white party, it’s going to have to adopt a populist economic agenda that is designed to reduce wealth inequality.
1.) Rush is getting better. When people show signs of getting better, especially those who are as influential as Limbaugh, I think we should encourage them to keep moving the right direction.
2.) You will get no argument for me on these costly economic gaffes. I’m worried that candidates like Kasich, Johnson, Toomey, and Portman (all of whom got elected in a backlash wave election) will prove short lived one termers in the Midwest. Their economic philosophy is not a good fit with the region.
“1.) Rush is getting better.”
He’s gotten better and worse over the years. Which ever way the wind blows. I’ve been told at one point early in his career, he criticized Israel. One thing you can say for sure is that he consistently makes an effort to deracialize issues and to view things through a simplistic partisan lens. I would argue that Glenn Beck gained a lot his following by going a little bit further than Rush for while in noticing race. Don’t forget Limbaugh’s extreme devotion to the neocon foreign policy agenda. That’s a draw back of most anti-immigration politicians: they tend to be ultra-neocon on FP.
I think that many of the new GOP voters may go back to the Dems if the economy doesn’t improve dramatically. We all remember that many of these people voted for Obama in the first place because the GOP was so bad for them economically.