Mainstreaming on the Jewish Question

50 Comments

1. The post we’ve been waiting for.

   All previous posts were just warm-ups.

2. Durbin is on the floor of the Senate right now pushing the DREAM Act. Sick to behold.

3. In for a penny, in for a pound.

   If you want to avoid the stigma of being aware that there is a Jewish problem you have to change your name and start a new website.

   The Jews never forgive and they never forget. If you try and mainstream this site and it ever becomes influential every Jewish newspaper (and that’s most of them) will use the old “Hunter Wallace Newsletters” to smear any conservative who makes the mistake of quoting Hunter.

   With the Jews you’re with them or against them. Since you’ve already blown your cover might as well go full Hitler and tell the truth.

4. Jack,

   If we take as our starting point the axiom that the right thing is almost always done for the wrong reasons, then there is a lot that we can do on the Jewish Question.

   (1) I think the WikiLeaks scandal can be used as a jumping off point for making the point that AIPAC is engaged in espionage. I think appeals to the paranoia and patriotism of White Americans would prove much more successful in moving the issue forward and turning Whites against the Israel Lobby.

   (2) The major gripe that I have against Israel is the foreign aid that we shell out every year on them. The fiscal hawks are already looking for areas of the budget to cut.

   I try to make the point whenever I have the opportunity to do so that we need to slash the foreign aid budget to zero. This includes aid to Israel which is wasteful spending.

   (3) I think Alinsky was absolutely right about the need to personalize issues. Instead of attacking “the corporations,” Alinsky always advised attacking a specific person and making him the focal point of animus and then using that animus, once it had been stirred up into a frenzy, to demonize the larger entity.

   When it comes to the Jewish Question, I would recommend attacking the most destructive Jews like George Soros as individuals. Ordinary people can grasp that George Soros is their enemy.

   You can then portray George Soros as the Antichrist who is the string puller between all sorts of destructive Jewish organizations. Ordinary people will then transfer their hatred of George Soros to institutions that he is involved with.

   (4) A good example of this was the destruction of ACORN. O’Keefe made that video of the corrupt ACORN employers catering to a pimp and his prostitute. Ordinary people then transfered their dislike of those two corrupt ACORN employees to ACORN itself.

   More on this later.

5. Durbin is on the Senate floor now with a big picture of a DREAM Act poster child. He is using the same tactic, personalizing the issue, to sucker gullible conservatives into voting for his mass amnesty.

6. First they have to be convinced that what the Jewish community is doing is wrong and ultimately will destroy our way of life before you can go pointing fingers at them. If they buy the line that the civil rights movement was manna from heaver, then when you point out Jewish involvement such folks only conclude that the Jews are the heroes in the story. You have to convince them first that there’s been a crime before pointing out the culprit. (Which needs to be handled very delicately, in a dispassionate tone where you feign to be less outraged than the audience.) Often the best way is to let them hear the Jews themselves take credit for the Culture of Critique, show them the A&E Documentary Hollywoodism: Jews and Hollywood where they boast over using the power of cinema to change American social attitudes over the course of last century. No one can say you are a conspiracy kook when it comes right from the horse’s mouth. It is also important to explain the Culture of Critique as coming out of a mindset in the Jewish community rather than in conspiratorial tones, which turn off normal people. After all, it is obvious not all Jews are “in” on “the conspiracy,” as a matter of fact the Jews Red State gentiles are most likely to encounter are disproportionately working stiffs with more conservative outlooks. I think as an ethnicity they tend to possess and inherent sense of alienation, probably hereditary, that explains what draws them to such issues. Issues other alienated groups like queers and gentile oddballs are also drawn too. Just these radical movements never quite had the wealthy and connected (MEDIA!) benefactors like the Jews before and in the past the white male power structure was able to overcome the likes of John Brown, etc.

7. Jews manipulate our foreign policy … look right here … even Mearsheimer and Walt of Harvard University agree with us.

8. You have to start within the experience of your audience.

   Why not go over to Reddit? They hate Israel over there. Just go over there and quote Noam Chomsky about how Israel is a fascist state and an enemy of the “human rights” of Palestinians and so on.

   You will get a much better response that way.

9. “‘IT’S THE JEWS. THE JEWS CONTROL EVERYTHING, THE JEWS ARE THE SPAWN OF SATAN, EVERY TERRIBLE EVENT IN AMERICA FROM THE DEPRESSION, WORLD WAR I, BLACK CRIME, BLACK RACE RIOTS, PORN, FEMINISM, HOMOSEXUALITY, COMMUNISM IS THE FAULT OF THE GOD DAMN JEWS, WE SHOULD EMBRACE AL QAEDA, HAMAS, THAT HAIRY DWARF LEADER OF IRAN, THE BLACK NATION OF ISLAM, JEREMIAH WRIGHT ANYONE WHO HAS EVER SAID OR DONE ANYTHING AGAINST….
   THE JEWS!”

   The above is an absurd straw man argument. If one scours the internet the above exaggerated views can be found here and there, but presenting them as the norm only serves to underline the poverty of your own argument. But please do not not interpret my dissent as caring whether Hunter Wallace embraces neoconservatism, because it is all pretty much the same to me. I’ll still probably read him, as I still read Free Republic. Right now my favorite blogger happens to be the Jew, Kunstler. That blog has the entertainment factor A plus 1. It will be interesting watching Hunter try to mend fences with Jews. I wouldn’t hold out much expectation for success in that regard, but it will still be interesting to watch.

10. There really are people who fit the description above. I could start naming them.

    They take a few reasonable points about the Jewish Question and transform it into a comprehensive ideological worldview that is the key to explaining everything from monetary policy to soap suds.

    I have seen plenty of White Nationalists over the years advocate alliances with the Black Panthers, meCHa, al-Qaeda, North Korea, Russia, Iran, etc.

11. I’ve been following James Howard Kunstler for five years now. I just finished reading Witch of Hebron yesterday.

12. HW: “I have seen plenty of White Nationalists over the years advocate alliances with the Black Panthers, meCHa, al-Qaeda, North Korea, Russia, Iran, etc.”

    What percentage of racially conscious Whites fall into the above category, 5% maybe 10%? It is not the norm. It is like saying VNN is mainstream. Jack Ryan’s post is absurdist. But go ahead, mend fences with the Michael Savage wing of the Republic party. It is worth a try, although it will be tricky. You guys will never be accepted by Freepers though. They are persnickety on the Jewish question, and bode no backtalk to their masters.

13. It will be interesting watching Hunter try to mend fences with Jews. I wouldn’t hold out much expectation for success in that regard, but it will still be interesting to watch.

    The really interesting(more like hilarious) part will be watching “Hunter” scurry back into Fanatic mode when they start dragging him over the coals.

    Hunter, I think next time you’re in Nashville I owe you a drink or two. Hell, you can even bring all of your necon friends.

14. “So how do we “mainstream” honest/effective discussion/activism on “the Jewish question””

    We could promote OUR history and culture with positive figures such as Alfred the Great, or some other key people in the pre-20th Century period (Medieval/Renaissance, etc) and attempt to discuss the negative influences of the jews in those societies while focusing on the promotion of our culture and history. The idea is to get our folk interested in discussing something that is part of their white history and culture but to also slip in the jewish question, ie., usury, etc. and the its problems.

    We can beat these people (or any other foreign people) at the cultural level; what’s needed is less bickering, and more unity in cultural warfare.

15. ” It will be interesting watching Hunter try to mend fences with Jews.”

    Hunter’s mending fences with Jews? Doesn’t seem that way to me. Seems like Hunter is acknowledging the MSM-implanted crime-think-stopper hobbling our people, such that anytime they hear someone combine Jews and bad behaviors in the same sentence, the critical thinking facilities gets short-circuited: “ANTISEMITE! ANTISEMITE! ANTISEMITE! ANTISEMITE!”

    Therefore, the Jewish Question must be raised very gingerly to avoid triggering the buzzer, so to speak, so our people can even HEAR us.

    I think a pithy statement in one prominent corner of the blog to be clicked on that newbies can take an About Jews 101 course would be helpful. Start ’em off easy. If you can avoid the bzzzzzzt long enough to give them the basics, then their own natural curiosity and growing surprise and disdain, all fully backed with linked documentation, will lead them to the inevitable conclusion: The Jews are not our friends.

16. I’ve been posting on Free Republic for months now.

17. Feel free to ride down to Birmingham anytime.

18. I agree with the main points of this post: 1) White advocates can create inspiring material that does not mention Jews, and 2) criticism of Jews should be fair and honest. Criticism of Jews that is not fair and honest just undermines our own case.

19. I’d like to share some personal experiences on this – as I have been engaged on this issue for a long time.

    My main advice is to “proceed with caution” and never try to spill the whole SECRET OF THE JEWS in one sitting. Be aware of who you are talking to: are they Christian religious? If so, you don’t want to launch in to a big lecture how Judeo Christianity was a Jewish plot hatched by the Jew St. Paul/Saul of Tarsus to bring down the White Roman Empire. If the person is secular, liberal, has advanced science degrees, you don’t want to go in to rants accusing Jewish Hollywood of waging a war against Christmas, and promoting gay rights, women’s rights, supporting Black civil rights.
    When it comes to the 6 Million Holocaust Hoax, again proceed with caution – it’s become a religious fundamentalist belief in America that World War II was a holy war of America, leading the forces of good against evil – NAZI GERMANY. I usually try to see if the person has any interest in real history, cares to know which countries were on which side in World War II and then show that I know lots of real history and say that I think Americans should be free to study history, all kinds of history and not get put in jail for reading some book which suggested that the official 6 Million figure isn’t 100% true.
    I also recommend that White folks attack the anti White Jewish forces where they are weakest. Most White Americans detest mass NW Third World immigration – only some clueless idiot thinks it is a good thing to flood America with millions of AIDS infected Haitians, Somalians, Al Qaeda terrorists. So when you present in a soft way that Jewish Congressman, Senators have the worst immigration grades from NumbersUSA you are presenting some facts that the other White person will see confirms his world view. Be careful about shouting that THE JEWS ARE THE ONE PUSHING FOR WARS AGAINST IRAQ, IRAN. Lots of regular White Americans like wars, like the military and so when some popular fake folk hero like Ted Nugent or Toby Keith is hired to whip up support for the latest Jew war, most White Americans are going to go along, at least for a time.
    And my main advice is to be

    Positive – mainstream White

    Don’t talk about politics too much. Instead become a well liked, respected member of some White community and then slowly teach others around you about the facts of life.

20. A good start would be to stop calling it “the jewish question”. Start calling it “jewish attacks on our European-American people and European-American culture”. Focus on the fact that it is jewish organizations that are attacking us!

21. One step at a time. The radical-Jew core of the Left detests Israel because it violates their universalist drive. As do hardrights and millions of ordinary, libcon Americans. Excellent: we ally with them (cf. Counterpunch) until such time as the Jew-state in Palestine is no more. Add 4 million – or however many escape – extremely visible/noxious Jews to the political stew in America. Then we take the next step.

22. Phil says:
    December 18, 2010 at 3:35 am (Edit)
    A good start would be to stop calling it “the jewish question”. Start calling it “jewish attacks on our European-American people and European-American culture”. Focus on the fact that it is jewish organizations that are attacking us!

    Jack Ryan replies:
    I don’t think it is good to “Start” by stating that the subject is an “attack” of Jews against European Americans. Most mainstream Whites don’t want to jump right in to a bitter feud, where different ethnic groups are “attacking each other” especially with a group like the Jews.
    Instead, try to present this subject as something similar to other conflicts, disagreements – for instances British Protestants and Irish Catholics having conflict in Ulster/Northern Ireland – is one side completely “good” the other completely “bad”? Are Jewish conflicts with the Palestinians a case of the Jews being 100% good and the Palestinians being 100% bad? How about Jewish conflicts with the locals in countries like Russia, Ukraine, Lithuania, Poland, Spain and yeah Germany. Is it fair to say that all of these conflicts were 100% the fault of the White Gentile populations in these countries and no single Jewish person ever, did anything wrong?
    Then move right in to individual instances of Jews doing things wrong in America like Roman Polanski getting away with drugging and raping a 12 year old girl. Is that right? Was Roman Polanski the good guy and the 12 year old girl victim the bad person and was it right for this well connected Hollywood Jewish film producer to have completely escaped punishment all these years for raping a child?
    And I highly recommend that you don’t come off as “obsessed with the Jews”. This is just another subject that you know a lot about – and as you are a successful, intelligent White person who other Whites respect and can see you are like them, on their side, they trust you and might listen to you on this subject, but only if you present this subject in the right way.

23. Israel is a fellow nationalist state. End of story. Support the nationalist Jew, attack the internationalist Jew. Yes, we can get Israel on our side. Praise Yahweh, the Nazi God.

24. Alexander says:
    December 18, 2010 at 5:29 am (Edit)
    Israel is a fellow nationalist state. End of story. Support the nationalist Jew, attack the internationalist Jew. Yes, we can get Israel on our side. Praise Yahweh, the Nazi God.

    Jack Ryan replies:

    Support Israel – the homeland of the Jews……
    Send them home!

25. There is no “mainstreaming” the Jewish question, and basically EVERYONE posting here knows it. As soon as the word “Jew” is offered in any but the most affectionate and adoring context, the very mainstream audience this blog apparently now seeks to woo, will tune out like a teenager in civics class, if not grow fully hysterical on the way out! Come on – we’ve all seen this time and again…and again…and again! I’ll bet everyone posting here has tried this more subtle approach on any number of websites, only to be shouted down and/or summarily banned in a New York second.
    Why is this blog now pretending the mainstream is suddenly going to be receptive to anything of this sort?

    I also sincerely doubt becoming the defacto Saul Alinsky of conservative America is likely to change the mainstream’s opinion on the Jewish question…or anything much beyond what they embrace already.

26. sorry wns, but you will never turn the white people of america against jews. nor do you need to. what you can hope for is a “pro-white” government in which jews are marginalized, relegated to their traditional advisory “court jew” roles.
    this will not involve any sort of specifically anti-jewish coercion, but will be a simple reflection of political reality – if most jews are leftists, and the leftists are ousted from power, then most jews will be ousted from power.
    it will also be a reflection of demographics – liberal jews have a ridiculously low tfr. they are yesterday’s threat.

27. Perhaps I’m dumb but I can’t tell if the last paragraph about Hitler was sarcastic or not. Hitler was a “great artist” and “leader of our people”? Hitler was a psychopath with a stupid looking mustache. He’s probably the worst thing to happen to white people in the history of civilization. Hitler is not a leader for me or any white person I know. You want to reach out to regular white people and mainstream talk about Jews, or mainstream anything for that matter, then you praise Hitler which probably chased away a few hundred rational white people. Affectionately calling him “Addy” doesn’t help either ffs.

    For arguments sake let’s say he was “a great man”, ya know, basically an all around good guy and leader, just misunderstood. Who cares, it’s done. Stick a fork in him.

    The frequency in which pro-whites shoot themselves in the foot is staggering to me. It’s a shame because the rest of your post was reasonable.

28. Any-one who advocates an alignment with Jews has already lost. Isn’t this blindingly obvious by now?

29. So – Cromwell allowed Jews back in England. The English Crown permitted the Mayers to open up a bank.

    How’s it been going so far? For Whites. How’s it been working out?

30. I thought OD was about “mainstreaming” now. Are positive references to Hitler in keeping with that mission?

31. It’s a shame because Hunter has been on a roll lately, then you have this Hitler praising which is yet another setback. It’s tragic. It’s odd because this is the type of thing that vanguardists do to keep themselves alienated, which is what Hunter has been railing against.

32. I think we are getting hung up on semantics and taking past each other. This word mainstreaming is a real problem. ODs efforts to mainstream, as I understand them, are geared toward making our making the message more palatable to the mainstream, and more focused on practical, mainstream concerns, but without compromising core ideas. I’ve read Jack’s post a couple of times, and he does not say anything about avoiding the JQ completely, trying to mend fences with Jews, or winning over Freerepublic with philosemitism. He says the JQ is not a winning issue with Whites (true), that it is especially not a winning issue when presented in an unreasonable way as Jew obsessives often do (true), and solicits opinions on how approach the JQ in a fair and honest way. Nothing wrong with that.

33. Israel is a fellow nationalist state. End of story. Support the nationalist Jew, attack the internationalist Jew. Yes, we can get Israel on our side. Praise Yahweh, the Nazi God.

    Israel is NOT a nationalist state, because Zionism is NOT Nationalist, it’s Internationalist. A nationalist country would not need it’s tentacles spread all over the globe, draining economies, using it’s influence to pass laws in foreign lands, and manipulating other countries to fund a foreign government’s arrogance and deceit.

    There might be Jews who are Nationalists, but the mechanism involved in propping up Israel is closer akin to an international crime syndicate than a true nationalist country. How much money does Israel receive every year from foreign countries? How exactly are they earning this money? Do you see anything remotely close to an AIPAC when talking about a country like Sweden? Norway? How about Germany or France?

34. I can’t mainstream this website without gutting the archives and imposing draconian censorship.

    When I talk about “going mainstream,” I am talking about what you do in real life, not what you say under an anonymous pseudonym on the internet.

35. I haven’t forced anyone to adopt my “mainstream” posture either.

36. For the record, I am not trying to “mend fences with the Jews.” I recognize that Jews are a problem.

    The difference is that I have watched the vanguardists vent their emotions about the Jewish Question for ten years now on VNN and other websites without having the slightest impact on the problem. That convinced me that rhetorical radicalism is not a solution. It is just an escape valve.

    I think it makes much more sense to advocate cutting the foreign aid budget and to single out the most destructive Jews like George Soros. These are issues where you could conceivably gain some traction.

    It is also worth noting that the “worthless conservatives” already dislike Hollywood movies. They also dislike the ADL for going after Mel Gibson. I see attacks on the ADL all the time now.

37. My problem is with American Jews.

    I dislike the Jewish neocons and leftists whose misbehavior is so well known in the pro-White community. At the same time, I have never blamed Jews for all of America’s problems.

    As for Israel, the only thing I have against Israelis is that they try to manipulate our foreign policy, and we are subsidizing them with welfare. If Israel were ever cut loose, I could really care or less what happens to them.

    I really wish America Jewry would make the “aliyah” over to Israel or whatever it is called. If they can’t stand this country, they should get out of it. The same goes for the vanguardists who are the spitting image of radical alienated Jews.

38. http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/lies-about-zionism-and-the-new-world-order-from-the-left-and-the-right

39. HW: “I’ve been posting on Free Republic for months now.”

    You haven’t been talking about Jews on Free Republic for months now.

40. LEW says:
    December 18, 2010 at 2:27 pm
    I think we are getting hung up on semantics and taking past each other. This word mainstreaming is a real problem. ODs efforts to mainstream, as I understand them, are geared toward making our making the message more palatable to the mainstream, and more focused on practical, mainstream concerns, but without compromising core ideas. I’ve read Jack’s post a couple of times, and he does not say anything about avoiding the JQ completely, trying to mend fences with Jews, or winning over Freerepublic with philosemitism. He says the JQ is not a winning issue with Whites (true), that it is especially not a winning issue when presented in an unreasonable way as Jew obsessives often do (true), and solicits opinions on how approach the JQ in a fair and honest way. Nothing wrong with that.

    Jack Ryan replies:
    Yes, you understood my post.
    The key issue here is: what works?
    How do we deal with this issue in a way that doesn’t result in us losing, facing devastating personal losses, loss of employment, loss of social status and then having our side suffer terrible political losses.
    And I am confident in saying that open, day in, day out anti Semitic Jew hatred is a huge turn off with the White public. Look at David Duke – Duke was being very successful in the early 1990s when he was finessing this issue instead of featuring anti Jewish commentary every day like he does now.

41. Speaking of Jews, Frank Rich was gloating recently in the NYT about how Euro-Americans will soon be a minority. Check it out:

    http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/12/let_the_non-whi.php

42. Hunter Wallace says:
    December 18, 2010 at 3:20 pm
    My problem is with American Jews.
    “I dislike the Jewish neocons and leftists whose misbehavior is so well known in the pro-White community.”

    Jack Ryan replies:
    Also, understand that certain Jewish individuals, organizations are attempting to do similiar destructive policies in the UK, Europe – Jews just don’t have the same numbers and wealth in Western Europe & the UK that they do here.
    Did people see that Jewess who led the Labor Party assault to take out the BNP’s local council members in Barking (I believe it was). This Jewess put on a Muslim scarf and went in to the Paki Mosque to champion their side against the BNP. Unfortunately she won. David Duke had a good video featuring a Jewess in Sweden explaining that Jews would be pushing very hard to make Sweden a multi cultural society – which in Sweden means assisting the flood of Muslims from places like Iraq.
    So, yes – we do have real problems with certain Jewish people, Jewish organizations, Jewish ways of thinking. It is a standard Jewish way of thinking to demand that all White nations, all White communities, schools, churches anything all White must be changed, when the Jews see anything healthy, anything all White like two hockey teams playing, they go off and start push, push, pushing for

    Change

43. I agree w/Nathan on Jack’s post. It’s an important topic, but his last paragraph and photo choice show exactly how *not* to mainstream such a discussion. Strictly from a PR perspective, it’s counterproductive to the point of subversion.

44. frontwards says:
    December 18, 2010 at 5:21 pm
    I agree w/Nathan on Jack’s post. It’s an important topic, but his last paragraph and photo choice show exactly how *not* to mainstream such a discussion. Strictly from a PR perspective, it’s counterproductive to the point of subversion.

    Jack Ryan replies:
    My point in presenting Addy Hitler and Leni Riefenstahl’s film Triumph of the Will is to show how folks who are generally considered “extreme” – were instead using successful mainstream propaganda that avoided negative commentary about Jews. And White Americans should do the same today. Just go watch the whole movie for free on youtube and note that no one is ranting and raving about Jewish plots, Jews controlling everything etc. Triumph of the Will is very positive – and works, the movie didn’t repel the average mainstream German or Americans then and now. That was my point.
    Here’s the link:
    

45. “O.D. is going mainstream”

    You can’t mainstream WN directly because mainstream is anti-white. However you *can* mainstream yourself and work to make the mainstream less anti-white which indirectly helps to mainstream WN.

    There are good suggestions on the thread already i’d just add whenever the Nazis or the holocaust comes up mention the Bolsheviks and especially the Ukrainian holocaust. Holocaust denial is the ultimate sin and yet post-war western civilization is built on the denial of the Bolshevik Holocaust. It may not be immediately obvious why that will work but it will.

46. How do we address the problems that are affecting our country today when you want us to ignore the fact that it is the Jews who are the cause of many of them? Should we pretend that Darth Vader is the cause of those problems? How about Count Dracula? The reality is that if a white person likes the Jews then they are no friend of ours and we should not waste our time trying to recruit them.

47. Joe Walker,
    If you’re talking to half-radicalized people talk plain. If you’re talking to non-radicalized people who’ve been conditioned to switch off when someone attacks jews then you need to get them to half-radicalized first. It’s like a psychological Maginot line. Go round it.

48. The reality is that if a white person likes the Jews then they are no friend of ours and we should not waste our time trying to recruit them.

    Aren’t you oversimplifying things a bit? I don’t see “Jews” as the cause of most problems. I do, however, see Jewish-led institutions and policies being a driving force for much of the turmoil around the world today.

    Honestly, there’s nothing stopping all the multimillionaire White men from stepping up to the plate and fixing some of the problems. What the hell have they been doing all these years?

49. “I don’t see “Jews” as the cause of most problems…Honestly, there’s nothing stopping all the multimillionaire White men from stepping up to the plate and fixing some of the problems.”

    What’s stopping them is they’re not as paranoid and obsessed with their group security as jews are.

    Apart from that though you’re right. If white people donated and got politically active in pro-white politics in the same proportions jews do then it would be a walkover.

50. You want intelligent suggestions on bringing up the topic of Jewish malevolence without scaring people? Of course, one should not be as intemperate as my last comment on the ACLU warning to the schools of Tennessee. I expressed my true feelings there, but I realize that I am far ahead of the general public in my understanding of Jewish malevolence. What brought me to this understanding was the realization that Jews were running the show in my hometown, all the while blathering about Whites being in charge and pushing affirmative action as a remedy. Hypocritical cunts. Damned right I spit on their Israel and their holocaust.
    But that’s not the way to sway the masses. Among the benighted, I limit myself to pointing out how the things they hate are Jewish. The media. Wall Street. The ACLU. The liberals. I always tell this as a story, the narrative of how Jews, believing that I was one of theirs, revealed their true attitude to me. And how ever since, I look closely at the names in any news story. I sometimes finish up by telling people to google this or that and see for themselves that Jews really do hog the trough and call everyone else greedy.
    I think this works because:
    1. People like stories rather than sermons. They can share stories, but preaching is one-sided.
    2. Most people understand the world through the actions of individuals rather than impersonal forces. People who don’t understand economics or sociology will interpret events somehow, and usually in terms of good guys and bad guys. Check the comments on yahoo to see what I mean. I want people to connect evils with the Jewish names that that authored them.
    3. I back my claims with evidence, the plain fact that you can look this stuff up online. Yes, Jews ARE 1/3 of the Supreme Court. It is a FACT that Jews run the media and therefore control what we hear or read. Wall Street IS Jewish, as is the Federal Reserve. All this power and influence for just 2.4% of the population.
    I don’t bother with any of this unless the people I’m with like to talk about politics or news. If people want to babble about Angelina Jolie, I’m not going to try to tell them that Jewish control of Hollywood is hurting their interests. Pearls before swine, you know. If politically aware Whites become Jewishly aware, the politically naive will eventually follow.