The Vanguard
I noticed this afternoon that Greg Johnson is going to force me to break my New Year’s Resolution.
A few weeks ago, I wrote a popular article called Why Vanguardists Can’t Win. It was a source of much discussion across the internet. I had intended that article to be a parting shot.
In 2011, I planned to move forward with my Hard Right project. I have grown tired of wasting so much of my time and energy arguing with all the broken alienated characters (many of whom are estranged from their own family members) that comprise the so-called vanguard. There comes a point where responding to kooks begins to lose its entertainment value.
I’m still planning to move in this new direction.
I want to build a new pro-White tribe: one that is realistic, relentlessly practical, optimistic, positive, flexible, sympathetic to ordinary people, not alienated, open to reform, sets tractable goals, engages the system, reaches out, triangulates, bites modestly, focuses on effective metapolitics, believes that better is better, and seeks to mainstream our ideas, increase and exploit racial polarization, build bridges, move the goal posts, attack the margins, connect with a mass constituency and work with conservatives to find common ground on issues like immigration and multiculturalism.
I was content to let this silent critique of the White Nationalist movement speak for itself. The contrast between what we are doing and they are doing would eventually send its own message. As we score points with our hard work and these Nietzschean supermen continue to subsist off the charity of strangers, the appropriate comparisons will be drawn.
But perhaps I should make explicit what is always implied in my writing?
I am emphatically rejecting a peculiar species of White Nationalism that is: elitist, rigid, kooky, impractical, unrealistic, ineffective, hopelessly alienated, condescending toward ordinary people, hostile to religion, patriotism, and traditional values, pessimistic, negative, addicted to wild utopian fantasies, escapism, and sterile navel gazing, refuses to participate in the political process, bent on erecting unnecessary barriers to communication, pushes away the masses as a matter of principle, makes the perfect the enemy of the good, substitutes a fake rhetorical radicalism for real substantial victories, sets unrealistic goals, believes in burning bridges and blazing a trail to the fringe, settles for nothing less than instant transformative revolutionary change, believes that worse is better, empowering our enemies is a good thing, and yearns for the destruction of our civilization and ruining the lives of millions of White people while insulting and alienating people we can work with on immigration and other important issues.
I am referring of course to the vanguard.
The term “vanguard” comes from “advance guard.” It stems from the root French word “avant-garde.”
The “avant-garde” was a well known nineteenth and twentieth century social movement and counterculture of hyper alienated French and Jewish intellectuals and artists.
Vanguardism has always been about shocking the bourgeoisie, tearing down traditional mores, nihilism and destruction, expressing one’s own radical sense of alienation from mainstream society. It is not a political project in any true sense of the word.
The idea that vanguardists are going to create a White ethnostate is laughable. It only takes a moment’s reflection to discern how flat out uninterested the vanguardists are in the nuts and bolts of political power in North America.
Have they ever written about the subject? When the climatic battle over the DREAM Act amnesty was going on, could they be found anywhere on the battlefield?
Holding My Tongue
I’ve been holding my tongue for several weeks now. I have tried to focus on more productive lines of analysis. It has not been for lack of opportunities. Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents have provided ample fodder for commentary.
Let’s review:
(1) In the ironically named post “Taking Action,” Michael Polignano (or Johnson writing under his name) proudly announces the creation of “The Vanguard” membership group, which you can join with a one time cash donation of $120.
There is a limit of 200 members, so don’t delay. That rounds out to $24,000 dollars. In exchange for joining this “Vanguard,” you get “special rewards down the road that are only available” to sustaining members and a hardcover edition of North American New Right.
The only action being taken here is Greg Johnson paying himself a salary to do absolutely nothing about our problems. This type of shameless fundraising (you are “heroic” to support me) is why I chose to abandon the idea of financing this website through movement donations altogether.
(2) In his latest comment, Greg Johnson says he is focused on “community building.” Now one might ask the obvious question here: why do you have to build a community from scratch?
The answer is that Greg Johnson sees himself as a Jim Jones-style guru figure trying to build a People’s Temple in San Francisco out of alienated vanguardists.
The need to “build community” would never occur to anyone around here because their lives, savings, hopes, dreams, and genes are invested in real communities that have existed for generations. Some abstraction can never compete with their hometown.
Ordinary people like their neighbors. They have a strong sense of place. They have an active social life in their communities. Many are leaders in their communities.
In contrast, vanguardists like Greg Johnson and Harold Covington turn their backs on their real families, real communities, and real homes and are eager to gin up a cult substitute among likeminded alienated intellectuals.
After more than twenty years of talking about “community building,” no such “community” of alienated vanguardists exists anywhere in America. That is the inevitable logical consequence of being an impractical fantasist.
(3) Lately, Johnson has been recycling material from D.H. Lawrence, no doubt to express his own sense of alienation and feeling of superiority over ordinary White people, who are always ridiculed as “lemmings” by the vanguard.
It has gotten to the point where vanguardists can’t even spam an article without doing something counterproductive to the White Nationalist cause.
(4) Counter-Currents has lately ventured into the realm of foreign policy to align White Nationalists with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Iran and Kim Jong Il’s North Korea. The objective here seems to scare away as many people as possible who might be sympathetic to our ideas.
(5) Out in San Francisco, Greg Johnson recently attended an event with Christian Lander of Stuff White People Like and got a personal autographed copy of his book. He then proceeded to compute and proudly announce his SWPL quotient: 122/150 and 41/92.
In the comments of his article at The Occidental Observer, he chortled that SWPLs would survive “the collapse” of the system and live off the Americans in the countryside like the Soviets did with the Ukrainians in the 1930s.
(6) Johnson has been hammering away at the “racially conscious left” theme lately. We are told it was here in San Francisco that “Michael O’Meara was born in 1946 and began his intellectual odyssey from Marxist and revolutionary syndicalist to White Nationalist and prophet of the White Republic.”
So what?
A real jackass might point out that San Francisco is represented by Nancy Pelosi in Congress and that every elected member of the House of Representatives from the Bay Area has a “D” or an “F-” from NumbersUSA and voted for the DREAM Act.
(7) My personal favorite though was F. Roger Devlin’s review of Guillaume Faye’s Archeofuturism. Apparently, Faye envisions a “Eurosiberian Federation” emerging from “the collapse” of the system.
In this fantasy world, the collapse of Western civilization leads to a new promethean elite aristocracy and post-egalitarian caste based society (the rest of us are to become serfs to the lords of the universe here) which will value “quality” over “quantity” and use its authoritarian powers to create “man-animal chimeras” and “decerebrated human clones.”
See, the last thing we need to do is “shut up” and “blend in” and adapt our message to “what plays in Peoria.” We might get a Mark Kirk in the Senate out of that. It is “too early” to elect “system politicians” of the type that will vote against destructive legislation like against the DREAM Act.
Instead, the rare “wide awake” White Nationalists must hold their ground on “man-animal chimeras” – it is like Greg Johnson and Guillaume Faye watched the film adaptation of H.G. Wells’ horrific dystopian science fiction novel The Island of Dr. Moreau, slapped themselves on the hip, and thought out loud, what a great idea, that ought to be in our party platform!
I clicked on the Guillaume Faye tag at Counter-Currents and it led a whole series of fantasist articles about the topic. Eurosiberia now becomes a whole Arctic Septentrion – the “spiritual center” of the White race – centered on France after global warming melts the polar ice caps.
“Septentrion will be the end of the American Dream, the return of the prodigal son to the European parental bosom.”
In this vision of the future, which predictably requires vanguardists to do nothing, America joins the Eurosibieran Arctic Septentrion minus a few Southern states which are ceded to non-Whites.
(8) It was already becoming clear in July that the “ideas” that Greg Johnson was promoting at Counter-Currents were weird and harmful to our cause. Remember the Hyperboreans from the North Pole who colonized Atlantis and the Lemurians who bred with negroes to create the Jews?
Let it be noted, I pointed this out at the time, at some expense to myself. If this was the “metapolitical struggle” to save the White race in North America, I thought we ought to just go ahead and throw in the towel right then and there.
I was widely criticized for being “anti-intellectual” around the blogosphere. The material that has been posted since that time has shown in spades just how prescient and on target my criticism was about the direction of that particular website.
In that article, Johnson described his eugenicist fantasies of creating “a god-like race” through genetic engineering “to give meaning” to “this meaningless universe.” He was seriously talking up an aristocracy of kooks manipulating our genome to transform White people into macrocephalic aliens from Star Trek and elves from Lord of the Rings.
He thought we needed “ideas” like that to “vitalize” a “decadent” White Nationalist movement. We needed to be more “progressive” and leftwing like a Star Trek convention.
(8) Greg Johnson’s alienation has reached a comical level these last two months: posting material from the Unabomber, taking repeated shots at Christianity, comparing himself to Jesus, imagining himself as a secret agent like James Bond 007, diving head first into the “New Age” movement, defending Satanism, attacking Republicans for their victories in the midterm elections, which later proved instrumental in defeating the DREAM Act in December.
From a kook aristocracy using eugenics to create “a god-like race” of macrocephalic aliens to “man-animal chimeras” in the Eurosiberian Arctic Septentrion in six months, I can only scratch my head and wonder where Greg Johnson is headed with this “image of a perfected society” next year.
What next?
Did Hitler escape to Mars on a flying saucer? I can’t wait to find out.
Join or Die
This post is a response to Greg Johnson’s article “Conservatives STILL Can’t Win.” It is nothing more than a rehash of all the usual vanguardist stereotypes which have been “common knowledge” in the White Nationalist movement for decades.
Conservatives are always playing defense (except on, say, Arizona-style immigration laws and affirmative action).
They are graceful losers and compromisers (except on, say, holding the line on the DREAM Act).
They are incapable of learning from their defeats (except on, say, reversing their former pro-amnesty position).
They are not even trying to fight back (except on, say, using a record number of filibusters in the Senate to defeat amnesty three times this year).
They don’t have a vision (except, say, the hundreds of thousands of people who participated in the Tea Party rallies).
They are backward looking and don’t share all of our goals (at least they hold the Founder’s America in high esteem).
These are some pretty serious charges.
Seeing how Greg Johnson has invited such an unfavorable comparison between conservatives and the vanguard, I will stop what I am doing for the moment and oblige him this one last time.
I will do it for no other reason than to relish the opportunity to expose the ignorance and stupidity of Johnson and his likeminded brethren.
Alaska
In Alaska, Joe Miller (a NumbersUSA “true reformer” candidate) knocked off Lisa Murkowski (who later voted for the DREAM Act) in the Republican Senate primary with the assistance of the Tea Party.
Sarah Palin, a widely loathed figure among in vanguardist circles, threw her reputation and money behind Joe Miller’s insurgent campaign. She also lent assistance to other friends of the restrictionist cause like Tom Tancredo in Colorado and Sharron Angle in Nevada.
Miller ultimately lost the election. The important lesson to be learned here is that grassroots conservatives put up a huge fight against Murkowski and this had the effect of cowing other Republican Senators like Graham and Hatch into voting against the DREAM Act.
In the House, Don Young, Alaska’s lone congressman, voted against the DREAM Act.
Hawaii
In Hawaii, conservatives withheld their support from Charles Djou, a pro-amnesty Asian Republican who voted for the DREAM Act, and expedited his defeat in the midterm elections.
Washington
In Washington, Republicans Doc Hastings (Washington 4) and Dave Reichert (Washington 8 ) voted against the DREAM Act in the House. Dino Rossi narrowly lost his Senate race against Patty Murray who voted for the DREAM Act.
As it happens, conservatives succeeded in banning affirmative action in Washington through the initiative process in 1998. The Washington Supreme Court has upheld the ban which became a model for successful initiatives in other states.
Harold Covington and The Northwest Front (who are hiding out in a bunker in the Pacific Northwest) were nowhere to be found in grassroots resistance to the DREAM Act in Washington state.
Oregon
Greg Walden, Oregon’s lone Republican congressman (Oregon 2), voted against the DREAM Act.
California
In California, we had a perfect showing in the House among the Republican caucus, 15 of whom voted against the DREAM Act and none in favor of it. Some of the leading restrictionists in America like Duncan Hunter (California 46), Brian Bilbray (California 50), and Dana Rohrabacher (California 52) are from Southern California.
In the 1990s, conservatives passed Prop 187 and Gov. Pete Wilson defended it in federal court. Tom McClintock, a supporter of Arizona’s SB 1070, could have become Governor of California in the Davis recall election
At the moment, the Tea Party is trying to go through the initiative process in California to get an Arizona-style immigration law on the 2012 ballot. Conservatives succeeded in banning affirmative action in California in 1996.
There is plenty of support for our ideas among conservatives in the Golden State. I have seen nothing but implacable hostility from the “progressives” in the Bay Area.
In the midterm elections, Carly Fiorina attempted to take down Barbara Boxer, but lost her race. The Fiorina campaign was another example of conservatives putting up a fight against the odds.
The only “resistance” worthy of the name in California comes from conservative quarters.
Idaho
I have already written a post about Idaho. The conservatives who live there like Mike Jorgenson have repeatedly tried to push a crackdown on immigration through the Idaho state legislature. They will be taking another crack at Arizona-style immigration reform next year.
In the midterm elections, Idahoans threw out Walter Minnick who voted for the DREAM Act. A few years ago, they threw out Senator Larry Craig who was the major champion of the AgJobs amnesty bill.
Senators Risch and Crapo voted against the DREAM Act. Rep. Mike Simpson also voted against the DREAM Act in the House.
Nevada
In Nevada, the Tea Party made a major push to defeat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in the midterm elections. Sharron Angle, who lost the election, was a NumbersUSA true reformer candidate.
Senator Ensign voted against the DREAM Act which Harry Reid brought to the floor of the Senate three times this year. Rep. Dean Heller also voted against the DREAM Act in the House.
Conservatives in the Nevada state legislature will be attempting to advance E-Verify and an Arizona-style immigration law in 2011.
Utah
In Utah, the Tea Party succeeded in defeating Senator Robert Bennett, a DREAM Act supporter, and replacing him with the restrictionist Mike Lee. They also succeeded in intimidating Senator Hatch, a former DREAM Act sponsor, into voting against his own bill.
Utahns ousted the pro-amnesty RINO Chris Cannon from the House. They replaced him with the restrictionist Jason Chaffetz who voted against the DREAM Act. Rep. Ron Bishop also voted against the DREAM Act in the House.
Back in October, I wrote a post about how Rep. Stephen Sandstrom is leading the fight for the Arizona-style immigration law in Utah. I expect to return to Utah in January.
Arizona
Arizona is without parallel among the states in the success that conservative restrictionists are enjoying there. They banned ethnic studies and affirmative action this year. They criminalized the presence of illegal aliens with SB 1070. They cracked down on employers of illegals in 2007 and are set to move forward on birthright citizenship in 2011.
Jan Brewer is defending SB 1070 all the way to the Supreme Court. Conservatives succeeded in forcing John McCain and Jon Kyl to vote against the DREAM Act. They picked up two House seats from Democrats in the midterm elections.
All three Republicans from Arizona (Flake, Franks, Shadegg) voted against the DREAM Act in the House. Arizona will soon be creating a new House seat for another conservative restrictionist like J.D. Hayworth or Randy Graf to occupy.
New Mexico
In New Mexico, a majority of the population supports Arizona’s SB 1070, and the new Republican governor there supports restrictionist immigration reform like denying driver’s licenses to illegal aliens.
Conservatives succeeded in knocking off Harry Teague (New Mexico 2) in the midterms who voted for the DREAM Act.
Colorado
Coloradans threw out John Salazar and Betsy Markey who voted for the DREAM Act. Tom Tancredo has done more than almost anyone in America to raise awareness about the problems of multiculturalism and illegal immigration.
Tancredo and Ken Buck lost their races in Colorado. It is a shame because Senator Bennet later voted for the DREAM Act and there was a huge contrast between Tancredo and Hickenlooper.
We had a perfect showing from Reps. Doug Lamborn and Mike Coffman in the House on the DREAM Act. Republicans in the Colorado state legislature are moving forward with their own version of Arizona-style immigration reform.
Colorado passed its own crackdown on illegal immigration a few years ago.
Wyoming
We had a perfect showing in White Zion on the DREAM Act from Senators Barrasso and Enzi and Rep. Lummis in the House.
Montana
Thanks to the conservative demographics of Montana, Democratic Senators Jon Tester and Max Baucus provided pivotal swing votes in the defeat of the DREAM Act. Rep. Rehberg in the House also voted no on the DREAM Act.
North Dakota
In the midterm elections, conservatives in North Dakota threw out Rep. Earl Pomeroy and Senator Byron Dorgan who voted for the DREAM Act.
South Dakota
Senator John Thune voted against the DREAM Act. In the midterm elections, conservatives in South Dakota threw out Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin who voted for DREAM in the House.
I also know that Republican state legislators in South Dakota are working on their own version of the Arizona-style immigration law.
Nebraska
Nebraska stood like a stonewall on the DREAM Act. Both Senators and all three Republican Congressmen in the House voted against the DREAM Act.
The city of Fremont recently passed its own anti-illegal alien ordinance which the ACLU is tying up in court. Nebraska is moving forward with Arizona-style immigration reform in 2011.
We owe a debt of gratitude to the conservatives in Nebraska who lit a fire underneath Senator Ben Nelson, a Democrat, who could have swung the wrong way on the DREAM Act vote.
Kansas
In Kansas, arch-restrictionist Kris Kobach was elected Secretary of State, who is the force behind a number of great restrictionist lawsuits in Nebraska and California.
Kansans sent restrictionist Jerry Moran to the Senate this year to replace RINO Sam Brownback in Washington. All three Republicans from Kansas in the House voted against the DREAM Act. Both Republican Senators voted against it too.
Oklahoma
Oklahoma is one of the most radical states on immigration and has passed a number of restrictionist laws in recent years. Both Republican Senators and every congressman from Oklahoma voted against the DREAM Act.
Oklahoma is moving forward on an “Arizona-plus” law in 2011, the most radical in the country, which will allow the police to start seizing the property of illegal aliens.
Texas
Every Republican in the House from Texas who voted on the DREAM Act chose to vote against it. Senators Cornyn and Hutchinson voted against the DREAM Act.
In November, I wrote an article about a Texas state legislator who camped out at the state capitol in Austin for 36 hours to file an Arizona-style immigration law at the first minute to do so.
Heroes like Debbie Riddle are ridiculed by the vanguard. Now that Republicans have a supermajority in the Texas state legislature, restrictionists will be pushing for their entire wish list on immigration in the upcoming session.
Minnesota
We had a perfect showing in Minnesota on the DREAM Act in the House from Michelle Bachmann, Erik Paulsen, and John Kline. Republican state legislators in Minnesota are working on their own Arizona-style immigration law. Now that Republicans control the Minnesota state legislature, we have a good shot at getting restrictionist immigration reform passed in that state.
Iowa
We had another perfect showing in Iowa on the DREAM Act among Republican Senators and Congressmen. Steve King of Iowa 5 will use his power as the incoming chairman of the House Immigration Subcommittee to kill all pro-amnesty bills for the next two years.
As I said last month, Iowa is moving forward with its own version of the Arizona-style immigration law.
Missouri
We had yet another perfect showing in Mizzou in the House and Senate on the DREAM Act. Missouri sent Roy Blunt, a NumberUSA true reformer candidate, to the Senate to replace Kit Bond.
I can’t help but notice that Blaine Luetkemeyer in Missouri 9, the “worthless conservative” who represents Alex Linder in Kirksville, voted against the DREAM Act.
Conservatives are always more reliable on immigration than the vanguard.
Arkansas
In the midterm elections, conservatives sent restrictionist John Boozman to the Senate to replace Democrat Blanche Lincoln who voted for the DREAM Act amnesty. They forced Senator Mark Pryor to vote against the DREAM Act out of self preservation.
Boozman voted against the DREAM Act in the House and the Blue Dog Democrat Mike Ross also voted against it because of the sheer number of conservatives in his district.
Republican state legislators in Arkansas have their own version of SB 1070 in the works. I will be writing a post about Arkansas early next month.
Louisiana
In Louisiana, Senator David Vitter voted against the DREAM Act and helped lead the opposition against it. Every Republican in the House except Joseph Cao, who lost his seat in the general election, also voted against the DREAM Act.
I know there are a number of restrictionist bills circulating in the Louisiana state legislature. I will be taking a closer look at Louisiana in a few days.
Wisconsin
In Wisconsin, conservatives succeeded in knocking off Russ Feingold and electing a Republican governor and state legislature that will likely pass an Arizona-style immigration law in 2011. Every Republican in the House from Wisconsin voted against the DREAM Act.
Illinois
Illinois sent Mark Kirk to the Senate who provided a crucial vote against the DREAM Act. Jack Ryan worked the phones and made his own resources available for other White Nationalists to contact their Senators.
Every Republican in the House from Illinois and two Democrats from conservative leaning districts voted against the DREAM Act. Not a bad showing for the home of Rahm Emanuel and Barack Obama.
Indiana
Matt Parrott and Hoosier Nation protested the offices of Senator Dick Lugar. Let me tell you, those are some real worthless conservatives in action right there. Someone has to do the job vanguardists won’t do.
Conservatives forced Senator Evan Bayh into early retirement this year. In the House, Reps. Pence and Burton voted against the DREAM Act, as did three Democrats who represent conservative leaning districts in Indiana.
Indiana is working on its own version of the Arizona-style immigration law.
Ohio
We had a flawless performance in Ohio on the DREAM Act. Every Republican in the House and Senate voted against it. Five Democrats from conservative leaning districts in Ohio voted against the DREAM Act. It won’t be long before I take a closer look at the Buckeye state.
Michigan
A few years ago, conservatives succeeded in banning affirmative action in Michigan. Every Republican in the House from Michigan voted against the DREAM Act except Vernon Ehlers who was forced into retirement early this year.
I’m told Michigan is working on its own version of the Arizona-style immigration law. Now that Michigan has a Republican governor and state legislature, we have a good chance of getting something passed there.
The Attorney General of Michigan is leading the fight to defend Arizona in federal court.
West Virginia
Conservatives forced Senator Joe Manchin to sit out the DREAM Act and Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell votes. Rep. Capito voted against the DREAM Act in the House.
Kentucky
We had another flawless performance on the DREAM Act in Kentucky. Senator Mitch McConnell and 4 House Republicans voted against the DREAM Act amnesty.
Kentucky is working on its own Arizona-style immigration law.
Tennessee
Tennessee is another state that already has restrictionist immigration laws. We had a solid performance there on the DREAM Act with all Republican Senators and Congressmen in the House voting against it.
Tennessee is working on its own Arizona-style immigration law.
Mississippi
I wrote a post about Mississippi yesterday. We had a solid performance there on the DREAM Act in the House and Senate. Mississippi already has E-Verify and will take a shot at the Arizona-style immigration law next year. It is widely expected to pass.
Alabama
In Alabama, we destroyed the Democratic Party in the midterm elections. Senator Jeff Sessions has led the fight against every amnesty bill in the Senate for the past ten years. Senators Sessions and Shelby voted against the bill.
Every Republican in the House from Alabama voted against the DREAM Act and the Democrat Bobby Bright did as well. Alabama is moving forward with all sorts of restrictionist immigration bills in 2011.
Georgia
In Georgia, Nathan Deal defeated King Roy Barnes to become the Southeast’s version of Jan Brewer in Arizona. The Democratic Party was crushed in Georgia in the midterm elections. It was defeated so decisively there that even black state lawmakers are jumping ship.
Both Senators and every Republican in the House from Georgia voted against the DREAM Act. Georgia is moving forward on every bill that restrictionists have on the table next year.
Florida
In Florida, conservatives ousted Gov. Charlie Crist and the Tea Party led a successful revolt against the GOP establishment in the Sunshine state.
Senator LeMieux and all House Republicans except for the Cubans in Miami voted against the DREAM Act. Florida elected the restrictionist Rick Scott as governor.
In 2011, Florida will pass its own version of SB 1070. I know the bill has already been filed. Florida is one of the first states I will be analyzing next year.
South Carolina
The conservatives in South Carolina ousted Bob Inglis from the House and twisted the arm of Lindsey Graham to the point where he voted against the DREAM Act. All the Republicans in the House and Senate except Inglis (who lost in the primary) voted against the DREAM Act.
South Carolina passed its own crackdown on illegal immigration in 2008. The Palmetto state is almost certain to pass another crackdown in 2011.
North Carolina
Conservatives in North Carolina led by ALIPAC forced Democrat Senator Kay Hagan to vote against the DREAM Act. Richard Burr also voted against it in the Senate. Every Republican and three Democrats in the House voted against the DREAM Act.
Virginia
Turning to the Red Dominion, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli unilaterally gave Virginia state troopers the authority to enforce their own version of SB 1070. He also sued the Obama administration over Obamacare and won his lawsuit in federal court.
All the Republicans in the House from Virginia voted against the DREAM Act. Virginia already has its own version of the Arizona-style immigration law ready to go in 2011.
Delaware
In Delaware, conservatives led by the Tea Party managed to rid themselves of Mike Castle, who voted for the DREAM Act in December. They tried to elect Christine O’Donnell to the Senate who would have likely voted against it.
Maryland
Rep. Bartlett in Western Maryland, the only Republican in Maryland’s congressional delegation, voted against the DREAM Act. Conservatives also succeeded this year in knocking off Frank Kratovil in the midterm elections.
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania had an outstanding showing this year. They threw Arlen Specter out of the Senate and sent Lou Barletta, the hero of Hazelton, to Congress. Every Republican and numerous Democrats in the House from Pennsylvania who represent conservative leaning districts voted against the DREAM Act.
New Jersey
The five Republicans from New Jersey in the House voted against the DREAM Act.
New York
The three Republicans from New York in the House voted against the DREAM Act. Rep. Peter King of Long Island is a well known restrictionist who will be the next chairman of the Homeland Security committee which has immigration oversight powers.
Vermont
In Vermont, Rep. Peter Welch’s Republican challenger was a NumbersUSA true reformer candidate.
New Hampshire
Conservatives elected Kelly Ayotte to the Senate to replace Judd Gregg who sat out the cloture vote (an effective no vote) on the DREAM Act. They also elected numerous restrictionists in the New Hampshire state legislature.
Maine
To their credit, the Maine twins in the U.S. Senate, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, came through for restrictionists and almost singlehandedly saved America from the DREAM Act amnesty.
Even in New England, there are conservatives who can make a real difference on immigration.
Massachusetts
In Massachusetts, Sen. Scott Brown, who took Ted Kennedy’s old Senate seat in January in a special election, provided a decisive vote in the Senate which was the kiss of death to the DREAM Act.
The Republican and the Independent who unsuccessfully challenged Gov. Deval Patrick supported Arizona-style immigration reform in Massachusetts. Republican state legislators in the Massachusetts House and Senate have long been pushing restrictionist bills and have said they will continue to do so.
Rhode Island
There are conservative state legislators in Rhode Island, the most liberal state in America, who are right now working on their own version of the Arizona-style immigration law. The outgoing Republican Governor of Rhode Island signed an executive order that brought E-Verify to that state which Gov. Elect Chafee has promised to rescind.
Connecticut
Let it be said that conservatives in Connecticut at least tried to stop the Jew Richard Blumenthal from getting elected to the Senate. That is more than can be said for the vanguard.
Final Thoughts
In every state of the Union, and especially in the Red States, I managed to find something helpful, positive, and constructive that conservatives were doing in the real world for White people, whether it be knocking off a pro-amnesty Republican or Democrat, playing successful defense on the DREAM Act, taking out Jews in the Senate, or going on offense on issues like birthright citizenship, Arizona-style immigration laws, ethnic studies programs, and affirmative action programs.
Yggdrasil is absolutely right that White Nationalists can lean on state and local officials and be kingmakers in close races. We have the money and the votes to do that. Some of the races in the midterm elections went undecided for weeks because of the razor thin margin of victory. The 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore was decided by hanging chads in Florida.
His advice, which Greg Johnson ridicules, is both sound and practical. It is an idea that you run with and expand upon.
Can you identify a single thing that the poofter Greg Johnson has ever done for White people or one single accomplishment that can be credited to the so-called vanguard? I mean aside from sucking up the donations and making all of us in the pro-White movement look like kooks and idiots in public.
Conservatives have won some battles. They have lost some other ones. It can also be said in their favor that they have tried to rid themselves of obvious problems like John McCain, Robert Bennett, Chris Cannon, and Arlen Specter. There will only be count ’em FOUR returning Republicans in the House and Senate who voted for the DREAM Act in 2010.
In contrast, vanguardists never win.
They never learn anything from their flawless track record of defeat, irrelevance, and public rejection. They don’t even put up a fight. They just raise the white flag and surrender the castle to the enemy.
Harold Covington calls for the surrender of Europe and 47 American states. Greg Johnson yearns for the collapse of Western civilization itself.
In the alternative reality of the vanguard, we are supposed to be the worthless cowards (we who are the resistance in the real world) and they (who hide behind pseudonyms and do nothing but fantasize on the internet) are the cutting edge of the White resistance in North America!
How do you figure that? What measuring stick are these people using? I would certainly like to know.
Gregor,
If you follow the Guillaume Faye tag at Counter-Currents, you will find that Johnson has been heavily pushing Archeofuturism and that O’Meara (I think) wrote the introduction to either that book or one of his other ones.
It is also clear from reading Johnson that he is heavily drawing upon Faye in pushing these “collapse” scenarios. Johnson’s own comments about using genetic engineering to create “a god-like race” of elves from Lord of the Rings is also indicative that he is fully on board with that “European New Right” train of thought.
What are the vanguards’ plans for cretins like the guy who authored this anti-white article:
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/12/in_time_opponen.php
I remember seeing a low budget sci-fi film from the late 60s-early 70s era in the Soylent Green genre that was about “decerebrated clones” being created for organ harvesting by the rich and famous. They were called “somas” in the flick, it seems this Faye character just watches a bunch of old movies.
This fuck is salivating waiting to take every White persons’ birthright! This is why we have to take [the system back] and not wait for its collapse!
This piece-of-shit is highly organized and all his organization centers around the fact that he’s Mexican.
http://grad.berkeley.edu/spotlight/huerta.shtml
http://sites.google.com/site/alvarohuertasite/home
http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/opinion/commentary/article_280abcb0-23da-5820-bb0f-ebb81ba5fda6.html
alvarohuerta@yahoo.com
Hunter, Greg fills an important niche, even if imperfectly. It is necessary to “move the goal posts” (the Overton Window Beck pushed so much last year) and well, “extremists” do a better job of it than Rotarians. Speaking as an extremist Rotarian at that.
In other words, practical pro-White ideas need to appear safely moderate to the Sheople who are fearful of their own shadows. Hitler was only possible thanks to the Boslsheviks whom he aped in the German style. Jefferson was possible because Sam Adams was a virtual lunatic.
Then there is the matter of their alienation to consider. I mean this in all candor: much of their counter-productive extremism is consequent to their alienation. Maybe it’s romantic to hear them as cri du coeur but perhaps we’d do better to bring them along with us to church next Sunday. Not a “judeochristian” church, just regular old Christian church of course. Baring that, a Saturday NCAA football game or NASCAR race would do. Let them experience life as a welcome, prodigal brother and their hearts might just soften a bit.
“the closest thing to The Eternal Jew ever seen on American television.”
FB would surely relish Occidental Dissent’s readership being given the opportunity to view his favorite film:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6229070629122885245#
“…that he is fully on board with that “European New Right” train of thought.”
I’m familiar with the European New Right and they’ve consistently produce good ideas. Alain de Benoist, for example, has a lot of things to say that we can use. I’m uncomfortable with his Arabism and Islamophilia but even that can be understood in terms of a plan to undermine Jewish plutocratic power in the West; and his rehabilitation and reinterpretation of great fascist thinkers is interesting. Alain Soral has also taken that route, after getting expelled from the Front National he set up the anti-Zionist Party with the mulatto anti-Semitic comedian Dieudonné. I think they view the Muslim world as the only opposing force to a globalist, homogenizing world run by the Jews and their acolytes. The problem they encounter is that most identitarian Europeans are being invaded and submerged by hostile, violent, and unassimilable Muslim migrants and their first priority is to get these people out of their countries. Hence, any alliance between identarian Europeans against “the Jews” is a non-starter. On the contrary, identitarian Europeans are increasing looking for allies among the racist, xenophobic, Islamophobi Jewish Right, best represented by the JDL and the like. The anti-Zionist Party principally attracts anti-Semitic Arabs, Africans, and some White altermondialist socialists who sympathize with Third World tin pot dictators like Chavez or Ahmadinejad. It has no real or natural constituency, either among Whites or non-Whites. However, one should keep in mind that historically speaking the European far-Right was indeed Arabist (German National Socialists spring to mind, obviously), but times have changed. Today, most immigrants are Muslim and any Arabism or Islamophilia is impossible and can only be regarded as treasonous by European ethno-nationlists who want to see these people gone.
HW:
Which is why I don’t completely dispose of the Glenn Becks as I’ve seen the “vanguardists” do, even with his recent nauseating MLK pandering. I don’t need ideological purity and perfection. As long as they are moving the goalposts in our direction little by little. It’s up to the next talented person to take the baton and take things further.
– Fox News: Not on “our” side and not pro-white, but have the guts to have someone like Glenn Beck on, despite him losing all his advertisers and saying something like “Obama doesn’t like white people.” Fox also stuck up for the Tea Party while the rest of the anti-white MSM were busy bashing it.
– Bill O’Reilly: One of the only guys on television who ranted away for years on immigration. “Put the military on the border!”
– Jared Taylor: philosemetic! Don’t care. I can’t imagine criticizing that guy and all he tries to do while I make my anonymous comments on the internet.
– Michael Savage: He’s a jew! Don’t care. I haven’t listened to him for years but when I did I was shocked at the pro-white position he would take. I’ll take it.
– Andrew Breitbart: He’s a jew! Don’t care. This guy stuck up for the tea parties and is out there causing mayhem. I admire it. I’ll take it.
Should I write off James Edwards as well because he’s religious and I’m not? I do think he harps too much on the gay agenda, which I think is a distraction and derails the pro-white cause. His strict paleoconservatism probably turns off a chunk of his potential audience, which is a shame because this guy has more potential than anyone in the pro-white movement. He’s very good-looking (no homo) and has a face made for tv, well spoken, fearless and a straight shooter. But hey, I can’t have everything, he sticks to his principles. I’ll take it.
I suppose I should write off Hunter too because he said nice rack 🙂
We can constructively criticize the above people, but not completely write them off. We can learn from them. They are useful. We can say the same thing about the vanguardists then. And that’s what Hunter is doing, criticizing them because the approach hasn’t been working. Some good comments have been made about how we need both, and really approaches from all angles. Great, but the vanguardist way has always been dominant, the mainstream way that HW is trying to advocate has always been shouted down and stamped out. It’s still happening. I just think HW did the math and saw that the old ways haven’t produced too many good results. Pretty simple.
I do draw the line though, when it comes to symbols, costumes, and explaining in a thousand different ways why you hate “niggers and jews”. Not on OD, but sometimes it seems like this is not the pro-white movement but the “hate niggers and jews” movement. Talking about it is necessary, harping on about it in extreme language is a detriment.
I’ll add that I don’t see the how getting rid of Jewish power and replacing it with the umma is a viable ethnic strategy for Whites. I’d rather be on board with high I.Q., civilized Ashkenazi Jews than far more numerous low I.Q. Arab/Muslim primitive barbarians who have done nothing since the 8th Century. Just from the perspective of ethnic genetic interests, a small and capable Jewish presence is far more preferable.
Correction: “Hence, any alliance between identarian Europeans AND MUSLIMS against “the Jews” is a non-starter.
What’s up with that link (from “Mighty”)?; when I clicked onto it, my Norton Internet Security blocked it, saying it is a “malicious website”. I tried twice, and Norton blocked again. Did anyone else have this problem?
“I’ll add that I don’t see the how getting rid of Jewish power and replacing it with the umma is a viable ethnic strategy for Whites.”
I’ll add that I don’t see how getting rid of Jewish power and replacing it with, er, White Power would not be a theoretically viable and optimal ethnic strategy for Whites.
“civilized Ashkenazi Jews”
Heil Avigdor Lieberman! A true fascist.
Oh and my comments get deleted nice as I sit here in the office of my law firm it nice to see you just erase them. I am supporter of the TOQ a founding memebr of the A3p that I know thru friends Yggdrissl supports (Charlie). I have been a republican a long time and it has gotten me nowhere but upsetat the actions they all take. If you want to support Mike Steele and he is the face of your party than so much for Racial preservation. I know men like Commander Rockwell while still very motivated by this same path he worked and met with William Buckley and he was shut out as where many others Revelio P Oliver comes to mind…. And where is the NRO and Buckleys legacy to our folk today?
I haven’t erased any of your comments in this thread. Is something caught in the filter?
“I think they view the Muslim world as the only opposing force to a globalist, homogenizing world run by the Jews and their acolytes. ”
Of course, the umma also promotes a globalist, homogenizing vision.
The anti-Semitism of National Socialists was an historical error of monumental proportion for which we’re still paying. Without that ingriedient, Germany would have won the war and we’d still be living in a world run by Europeans.
Nightowl,
So this Guillaume Faye combined the worst ideas of Soylent Green with that of The Island of Dr. Moreau? If I am not mistaken, I think he combined it The Terminator as well.
Here’s the relevant passage:
What is a semi-artificial biolithic creature?
“Of course, the umma also promotes a globalist, homogenizing vision.”
Arab Muslims despise negroes. So not in the sense of wishing to merge with the latter.
Oh, I get it.
Cyborgs … like the Borg from Star Trek!
Oldtimer:
Maybe your Norton is freaking out. The links are good.
Just from the perspective of ethnic genetic interests, a small and capable Jewish presence is far more preferable. – FB
Well, what we have now in the West is a “small and capable Jewish presence” although I doubt many would view that as a good thing given the nature of the Jewish presence, viz. its actions and goals. There may be Jews who see things our way but they are outnumbered perhaps 4 to 1 by the sort of Jews who enthusiastically support open borders, elimination of dissent, and all the rest. Are we to simply ignore that the majority of Jews view white racialists as demonic? How do you propose dealing with this situation?
I propose to get the 25% fully on board with our program. What’s the alternative? We have no viable alternative. An anti-Semitic platform is a total loser for us. If we could get 10% of Jews to support us, that would be fantastic. We’d win. Let’s take Larry Auster as a prototype, any White Nationalist who isn’t an anti-Semitic fanatic for whom ideology is more important than Whites, realizes that if we could enact his vision, we would achieve 100% of our own agenda. I view those who reject the Larry Austers as either fools or possibly double-agents who want us to fail.
“Oh, I get it.
Cyborgs … like the Borg from Star Trek!”
What is the purpose of this nonsense? Did you know that Faye used to act in porn movies? Why waste time on this “futuristic” crap?
Just from the perspective of ethnic genetic interests, a small and capable Jewish presence is far more preferable.
I think they are the root of the problem, but to shun, marginalize, or expel them requires power first. You aren’t going to climb the latter into such positions running on a platform of antisemitism, the system will throw everything it has against you as you are a mortal threat to it’s very existence. In The Art of War Sun Tsu says you win the battle before you ever fight it. That means getting power first and seeming uncontroversial, gaining trust and respect by doing something to earn such gratitude like bringing our factories back from overseas and firing affirmative action hires. Then you take on the Jews. and there are ways to take their power without saying that’s what your doing like breaking up their media conglomerates and putting in regulations that target their various financial scams. You can get away with putting “liberals” and “globalists” on chain gangs in the Aleutians, but if you say you are locking up Jews specifically for being Jewish you’ve got a hell of a storm on your hand in both domestic and international fallout.
An anti-Semitic platform is a total loser for us.
I’m not arguing. Decades of racialist failure can be owed to this (and other factors, i.e. nonexistent character/incompetence of leadership).
If we could get 10% of Jews to support us, that would be fantastic. We’d win. Let’s take Larry Auster as a prototype, any White Nationalist who isn’t an anti-Semitic fanatic for whom ideology is more important than Whites, realizes that if we could enact his vision, we would achieve 100% of our own agenda. I view those who reject the Larry Austers as either fools or possibly double-agents who want us to fail.
I think it’s worth a try but it will be difficult because Jews tend to instinctively view white advocates of any stripe as enemies (except for the numerically small Zionist groups you mentioned). Of course this owes to the legacy of NS as you admitted. But it will be difficult to attract Jewish support because the State has such a monopoly on propaganda that there is very little possibility for white advocates to get the message out reliably – even to our own people, much less Jews. The current nationalist parties in Europe still have not devised an effective method for this, and America hasn’t any organizations of significance though the population is certainly more open to our ideas than they have been in a long time.
Hot video. Youtube is trying to ban.
Great video.
KP, we’re only at the very beginning of this historic collaboration. The fact that 35 ethno-nationalist, far-Right European leaders went to Israel recently is only the beginning. We must view the development of an increasingly racist, xenophobic, ruthless, militaristic, and apartheid Israel as a win-win situation for us. Do I have to explain why? The fact we didn’t have a delegation from NA is a pity.
Whenever Israel perpetrates yet another racist outrage in the Middle East, I rejoice. Not because I hate Arabs, although I view them as an inferior people, but because the actions and behaviour of Israel blunts Jewish ritual-shaming and name-calling, at least from Zionist Jews. Unless they want to look like double-talking hypocrites. At any rate, I know that only a small percentage of Jews will grasp my extended hand. That’s fine. That’s all we need.
FB, what you are proposing is exactly how the neocons entered conservatism. Before long, they had taken it over and turned it into and anti-white movement primarily concerned with promoting Israel. Everyone who had any sympathy for whites was then expelled.
Some of the “far right leaders” kissing up to Jews in Europe are openly pro-multiracial and have no problem with non-white immigration, even Muslim immgiration(as long as they aren’t “extremists”). We have groups like the EDL, who are multi-racial, denounce the BNP and other nationalists and who get patriotic English people to protest against Palestinians. It’s exactly the kind of Jewish take over we had on the right here in America and if it’s not stopped, it will end just as badly.
History shows that every time whites have “collaborated” with Jews, they win and we lose.
Am I the only one who does not think Hitler would have appealed to the “Americanism” in people? There was something far deeper going on in those who came here than what the masses now generally equate with “Americanism”. That is what he would have appealed to. Not that we’re Americans, but that we’re actually much, much more. What, exactly, is anyone’s guess at this point. I think there’s enough information out there now though that we can safely refrain from appealing to “Americanism” without destroying any bridges. Especially in the South, which America wantonly destroyed.
Hunter – dead right you are about what Hitler did. And would do. Hmmmmm…George Washington re-incarnated….indeedy.
I went to one them thar Tea Party parties tonight. (I’m hammered, too!) I had a lovely time. Made every-one laugh. Hugged every-one. Expressed my outrage at ONegro’s end run “Commie-zlation” re: the Death Panel thing.
Said all kindsa things about [it]. Ages ranged from kiddies, to elderly folk. A very hip, well-heeled couple, in their 60’s, are leavng for a ski trip Out West, this weekend Very disturbed by possible loss of potential medical treatment, in future, on favored ski slopes. I embroidered on this theme. They don’t expect free treatment – them being highly White and all – they just want to be able to get treatment. …..
We need to be able to know “where people live” – and relate Racial Reality to their lives.
Oh – I made lotsa jokes along the lines of “…although Iran has no capacity to do a thing to the USA – nukes, please! – President Mahmoud would be doing us a big favor if he actually did nuke DC, at this point…”
That gots lots of ha ha’s. And several people lamented that “It wouldn’t work. He’s in Honululu now….”
I like to see what sorts of things “mainstream” people respond to. Then mine the rich veins of implicit Whiteness.
Oh – insight – Johnson has a “thing” for you, Hunter. He wouldn’t be ragging you about your weight, ad your gym wourk-outs, otherwise. He’s doing what homosexuals do, when they can’t their Secret Crush to notice. Or call.
Don’t mean to gross you out – but he’s attacking you cause he can’t have you.
While Arab Muslims may say “naughty” things about negroes they have never had any qualms about marrying and breeding with negroes. The dark and negroid features that many Arabs have is proof of that.
In Islam, any kind of racial, ethnic or national pride is strictly forbidden and considered a sin. Check out this quote by the leftist anti-racist Arnold J. Toynbee who for many years studied Islam and Islamic societies.
“The extinction of race consciousness as between Muslims is one of the outstanding achievements of Islam, and in the contemporary world there is, as it happens, a crying need for the propagation of this Islamic virtue.” – Arnold J. Toynbee
Well, Norton Internet Security must be owned by Yids I suppose because whenever I try to go to that site (AmRen) it tries to block it saying it is a “malicious site”. Ha! I can still get in by clicking “go to this site anyway”. I suppose that makes me a conspiracy theorist from some people’s viewpoint.
I support Israel’s right to self-determination, but it is really difficult to make a comprehensive parallel between Israel’s struggle and our own struggle.
Israel wants to kick out a bunch of Arabs from land that was theirs for many generations under the guise of “they hate Jews, we’re the chosen ones, we’ve been persecuted so we deserve it, and etc.”. We (in the European context) simply want the right to keep our own demographic majorities in land that has been ours since the beginning.
Basically, this proposal means we have to take their rhetoric of racial hatred and try to mainstream it. Most whites who have some sort of racial consciousness, implicit or otherwise, don’t literally hate blacks with a violent sort of vengeance , they simply wish to live apart, whereas Jews have this literal sort of seething violent hatred towards Arabs. In other words, I don’t see the rhetoric of ruthless militaristic apartheid as having any political traction for us. Whites are all about moral universalism and fair play, not racial holy wars.
Getting 10% of an already tiny population behind us doesn’t mean squat. I’m all for making alliances with honest Jews but I don’t particularly see why any energy should be spent on them at all. Many of them are energetic activists and I welcome them (who always join us because of a perception that multi-culti, and etc. is bad for fellow Jews, not because of some altruistic motivations towards whites in general), but it wont be some handful of Jews that saves us, it will be ourselves.
If the argument is that Jews are super-intelligent and super-resourceful, then the counter-argument is that the other 90% will marginalize that 10% quite easily.
I really don’t understand philo-semitism of this sort. I don’t think it hurts for Euro politicians to make treks to Israel to talk about the “Muslim Threat”, but I don’t particularly see the benefit. Israel has little to offer us, and it means little to the electorate. As I’ve stated before, if anything, there is a nominal amount of anti-semitism among the population, as shown by polls, (I’m not necessarily advocating that it should be exploited or amplified, but merely debunking the idea that mild anti-semitism is an immediate turn off).
Re: Auster – I agree with Auster on a broad spectrum of viewpoints, but he is intellectually dishonest and fanatical when it comes to even mild and fair criticism of Jewish behavior, to the point of psychopathy (his tirades against Kevin MacDonald that show he hasn’t read his work, and his fanatical defense of pedo Roman Polanski come to mind). Although I’m still willing to link to individual blog posts of his when he makes good points, he clearly has problems when it comes to introspection (if we ourselves as Whites are expected to honestly examine ourselves as a people in a historical context to understand how we got in this mess, why shouldn’t Auster be able to do the same w/r/t Jews?). I guess I’m a “double agent” huh.
“Well, Norton Internet Security must be owned by Yids I suppose because whenever I try to go to that site (AmRen) it tries to block it saying it is a “malicious site”. Ha! I can still get in by clicking “go to this site anyway”.”
You are not the only one noticing this Oldtimer:
http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2010/12/is-norton-safeweb-symantec-making.html
I liked FB better when he was a Nazi, or rather when he still had the balls to admit that he is a Nazi. This FB is boring and has jumped the shark.
Denise, when are you going to deflower Hunter?
Donald: “I don’t think it hurts for Euro politicians to make treks to Israel to talk about the “Muslim Threat”, but I don’t particularly see the benefit.”
The trek to Israel is a signal that they will now agree to a policy of lying and refusing to name Jews. From now on, they will denounce the judeo-critics as the bad guys. They will encourage white people to pester about immigration, but will hide the truth about who is responsible. It’s all the more disgusting, as they are supposed to be dissidents.
It’s not that they used to be open about the JQ in the past, but they will now be even less open, even though more and more people are becoming aware of the problem, thanks to the internet, and thanks to the more and more blatant Jewish domination of the white world.
Spooky teases out the relevant idea …..
“There was something far deeper going on in those who came here than what the masses now generally equate with “Americanism”. That is what he would have appealed to. Not that we’re Americans, but that we’re actually much, much more. What, exactly, is anyone’s guess at this point.”
That “much, much more.” is the entry point for working on Myth among White Americans. Once they’re disabused of the “paperwork patriot” version of identity, they’re open for looking into their deeper identity. Developing means and content to fill this void, once the void creeps into their consciousness, is the job of the “myth-makers”.
Gregor, who are these myth makers who will develop the new content to fill the void of which you speak? Individual and small groups of humans have never just made up new myths out of whole cloth, much less made up new myths and had them immediately catch on across the culture. The dominant myths in any culture are always the product of long historical accretions. They emerge through a complex interplay of trends and intellectual currents that no one directs, and are disseminated by the dominant cultural institutions of the day. So even if we grant, for example, that the idea of Americanism is now meaningless and that this void needs to be filled with new as yet unspecified mythic content, there is no way to do that in practice. It is an impossibility. There is no content nor is there means. Even if a determined band of WN artists or spiritual leaders somehow manage to articulate a new and inspiring mythic vision for Americans, which itself is a very dubious proposition, the vision won’t influence anyone if there are no cultural institutions to spread the vision.
LEW: How about the American historical mythos that already exists? Perhaps it doesn’t come up in school anymore, but the story was that America didn’t pick fights, but we finished them. We had an inconsequential military, but when others messed with us, we built armies and navies on short notice and stomped the other side badly. Because we were peaceful people, the aggressors always got in the first few punches, but we were strong and we held them back, and then taught them some manners.
Examples: The Revolution. Gallant colonists defeat Great Britain after series of defeats. (George Washington fought nine battles and only won three. The three victories mattered more.)
War of Texas independence: The Alamo, Goliad, then San Jacinto.
TWBS: First Bull Run, Seven Days, Second Bull Run, Fredericksburg, Chancellorville, and then Gettysburg. The Union got beat repeatedly, but pulled itself together.
WW1: The Army is little more than a national police force in 1917. But in a year and a half, we’ve got a million men in France, winning at Belleau Woods, Chateau Thierry, and the Meuse-Argonne.
WW2: Starts with Pearl Harbor and a bunch of other defeats, ends with Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Hold your fire, historians, I’m talking about myth, not fact.
Watch an action movie, see how the hero always gets his butt kicked in the first 20 minutes, and the bulk of the movie is about him regrouping and then slaughtering his foes in a 15 minute bloodbath at the end.
That’s our favorite story, America the Good is attacked by evil folks and we are so good and innocent that we are totally unprepared, and therefore get slapped around. But being Men of Character, we don’t let that keep us down, we rise up and win. That is exactly the story we are trying to play out here. We are Washington’s men at Valley Forge. We are holding the Union line with the 20th Maine on Little Round Top. We are embattled naval aviators hoping to get in a shot at the Japs at Midway. Our country has been invaded and torn apart and stripped of its wealth by Jews, leftists, liberals, and their multi-cultural freak show. It happened only because we were Good, we were tolerant of others and let them come here and participate in our country. We are now despised and hunted, but we have character and we don’t give up and we are going to make the bastards pay.
I think that mythos can work very well for us. And in the present situation, it’s pretty much objectively true.
“I liked FB better when he was a Nazi, or rather when he still had the balls to admit that he is a Nazi. This FB is boring and has jumped the shark.”
Notice CC continuing obsession with my deviationism. Anonymously lauding Hitler, expressing genocidal anti-Semitism, and anachronistic Teutonism are signs of courage in CC’s universe. Until you decide to post under your real name, shut the fuck up, CC.
CC like a good Stalinist or Muslim fanatic cannot bear to see somebody leave the “faith”. Anonymously worshipping Hitler and obsessing about the Jooz on obscure, extremist blogs doesn’t mean you’ve got “balls,” CC. It means that you’re a marginal nobody, a fantasist wallowing in his own irrelevancy.
“Notice CC continuing obsession with my deviationism.”
Notice FB’s ongoing obsession with deviation from his new philo-Semitic line. If one dares to notice the elephant in the room, Jewish power, the engine of our racial destruction, then FB is prepared to pathologize you into unpersonhood with veritably Jewish venom and fanaticism.
“extremist blogs doesn’t mean you’ve got ‘balls,'”
Translation: The Canadian Human Rights Commission, figuratively speaking, cut off FB’s balls. In true bitch fashion, because he has been deprived of his, he now figures you should not have yours either.
“It means that you’re a marginal nobody, a fantasist wallowing in his own irrelevancy.”
FB is now explaining to us his self-professed life of celibacy.
The Captain hasn’t been the same since the crusade against the faileos.
CC, who’s keeping you and Alex Linder from worshipping Adolf Hitler and dreaming of exterminating the Jews?
Why don’t you post under your real name, CC? Let’s see your balls.
I don’t worship Hitler or wish to exterminate the Jews. Stop projecting your twisted fantasies onto me.
You, on the other hand, have stated you would not lament it if Jews were to exterminate Muslims in their quest for a Greater Israel. This is clearly an inversion of your own desire to exterminate the Jews – you apparently have come to identify with the aggressor against your own people. Sick.
“I don’t worship Hitler or wish to exterminate the Jews. Stop projecting your twisted fantasies onto me.”
No? You don’t? There’s enough evidence on MR alone to convict you on both counts. Why are you backtracking now? A sudden lack of balls? But you didn’t answer my question: you call me a coward while posting anonymously. Why don’t you write under your real name, CC?
“You, on the other hand, have stated you would not lament it if Jews were to exterminate Muslims in their quest for a Greater Israel.”
Why you should I “lament” what Jews do to Muslims?
“This is clearly an inversion of your own desire to exterminate the Jews – you apparently have come to identify with the aggressor against your own people. Sick.”
Muslims aren’t “my people.”
If Germany had won the war our race would not now be facing extinction. My defense of NS is merely an extension of that proposition.
“Why you should I ‘lament’ what Jews do to Muslims?”
You imply you should not lament support of Jews in a propositional extermination of Muslims that amounts to collaboration in said extermination? You surely are morally deformed, FB.
“Muslims aren’t ‘my people.'”
Nor are Jews your people.
The enemies of the Jews, Muslims, who need not be our enemies, have become your enemies due to your newfound identification with Jews. As such, you support collaboration with Jews in doing horrible things to Muslims. It is the Jews who are the enemies of our people, not Muslims. Why would you wish to aid in the injury of those who need not be the enemies of our people? The answer is clear, having lost one outlet for your genocidal impulses, you have channeled them into another.