The reputed death of Osama bin Laden has gripped America and the world. An interesting cast of characters, imbeciles, and governments have united in praising President Obama, seemingly reversing his dismal popularity ratings among domestic problems at home like high unemployment, public debt, inflation, and multicultural dystopia once had people wondering if the United States is such a great idea after all.
A day after Osama’s death has brought a host of reactions from people in the tribe and broader autonomous nationalist community. Some confessed joy at Osama’s death, others wondered if this is the end of the War on Terror. Still others professed hope that “now we can bring our troops home from overseas.”
Cue in the reverie of many within the white nationalist movement along with some of the most powerful figures in the world, past and present: Tony Blair, Bill Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, George Bush, every neocon and Zionist imaginable, and various leaders within the European Union. It is interesting that Statists and white nationalists both hate Osama bin Laden.
It is my opinion that anything that certain individuals or groups consider a good thing (Tony Blair, Hilary Clinton, George Bush, NATO, etc) is not favorable to us.
If we can step back a minute and analyze what Osama bin Laden represents to these people, he was the most successful (and alternatively, useful, boogeyman) resister to Russian, American, and European influence in the Middle East and Afghanistan for decades. No other individual can come as close to resembling a James Bond style supervillian that evaded the most powerful and comprehensive government manhunt in world history for nearly ten years. After all of us are long gone and forgotten, Osama bin Laden’s a symbol of defiance, resistance, and radical Islam, Osama’s life and message will resonate with Muslims for generations to come.
Another facet that the orgy of euphoria at his death is forgetting that Osama is now a martyr for his cause. Although this does not mean as much to Western cultures, the deeply traditional and conservative Islamic world bestows great accolades to martyr’s who die while attempting to advance the Islamic faith. Here is an example of an explanation concerning the Islamic concept of martyrdom (shahada).
“The word shahada is derived from the Arabic verbal root shahada, which means to ‘see’, to ‘witness’, to ‘testify’, to ‘become a model and paradigm’. Shahada therefore literally means to ‘see’, to ‘witness’, and to ‘become a model’. A shahid is the person who sees and witnesses,[11] and he is therefore the witness, as if the martyr witnesses and sees the truth physically and thus stands by it firmly, so much so that not only does he testify it verbally, but he is prepared to struggle and fight and give up his life for the truth, and thus to become a martyr. In this way, and by his struggle and sacrifice for the sake of the truth, he become a model, a paradigm, and an example for others, worthy of being copied, and worthy of being followed.[12]
In this process, the keyword is ‘truth’ (haqq), its recognition and declaration, the struggle and fight for it, and the preparedness to die for its sake and thus set the model for the seekers of truth. The goal, motive, and the whole aim is the establishment of the truth. Jihad is the means for establishing the truth, and may lead to martyrdom, but does not necessarily lead to being killed for it in the battlefield, although it necessarily involves the continuous Holy Struggle, and death in the cause of the struggle.”
http://www.al-islam.org/al-serat/concept-ezzati.htm
We can see then that young men the world over will revere Osama bin Laden even when and where so-called ‘moderate Muslims’ repudiate the world-view and actions of Osama himself in mainstream media channels designed to dimmish the fears of non Muslims. Although it is not my intention to judge the faith of other people, there is a popular idea idea among nationalists that “not all Muslims in our country are bad.” This is a neocon canard that is quite popular on the web.
It is my belief that despite whatever marginal numbers of Muslim men and women take up the cause of global jihad from bin Laden’s martyrdom, and despite the likelihood of there being millions of Osama bin Laden wannabes and copycats, and many more terrorist atrocities committed in the name of Islam, the true threat facing our people remains the immigration policies of Western countries bringing in literally millions of Muslims who have these beliefs.
Last week in San Francisco I spoke about these views in public to hundreds of people and simultaneously sent a message that Muslims understand. I received an overwhelmingly positive response from our people who know instinctively that Islam and Islamic law is bad for our country and whom are inherently suspicious of the current President of the United States. But that feeling is, and I believe this is true in other countries as well, not articulated, expressed, or is considered ‘politically correct’ by the people that are supposed to be representing our folks best interests.
When I saw the multiracial orgy of frat boy’s celebrating at the White House and Times Square I reflected on what Osama was most recently fighting for, to oppose United States influence in the Middle East and Israel, and while looking at those young vibrant faces chanting “USA, USA,” I realized that bin Laden’s fight was a different front against the same Establishment that is willfully attempting to grind the soul of my people -our people- out of existence to the chants of patriotism and “USA, USA, USA…”
With Islam comes terrorism and demographic displacement from which our people will not recover from at current trends. I speak for myself when I say that I am disappointed that bin Laden was able to help usher in the death of one superpower but did not live long enough to see the end of the second superpower he did everything within his power to bring down.
Rest in peace.
“It is my opinion that anything that certain individuals or groups consider a good thing (Tony Blair, Hilary Clinton, George Bush, NATO, etc) is not favorable to us.”
This is generally true although one possibility is he simply outlived his usefulness and they’re just tidying because they want to replace him with Iran or Egypt or somewhere.
“he was the most successful resister to Russian, American, and European influence in the Middle East”
It makes me think that Bin Laden’s grudge against the USA had little to do with Islam.
Wikipedia has a list of the stated motives for the 9/11 attacks :
– Sanctions imposed against Iraq
– Presence of U. S. military in Saudi Arabia
– Support of Israel by United States
In fact, it was largely a reaction to the neocon foreign policy of the United States.
Besides that, I suspect that the “Islamic” terrorists consciously or unconsciously hold the West responsible for the destruction of their traditional society, when in fact, the real culprits are technical progress and modernization, and perhaps incompetent government.
“the true threat facing our people remains the immigration policies of Western countries”
In other words, the threat is Judaic, more than Islamic.
“bringing in literally millions of Muslims who have these beliefs.”
It doesn’t really matter if our substitutes are Muslim, Buddhist, animist, or something else.
English Defense League versus militant Muslims in front of the US embassy
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3567944/Islamic-fanatics-clash-with-right-wingers-outside-US-embassy-in-London.html
http://alcuin-constant.blogspot.com/2011/05/astonishing-blindness.html
Astonishing Blindness
“Do you know why America is in a better state than Europe? Because you enjoy more freedom than Europeans. And do you know why Americans enjoy more freedom than Europeans? Because you are still allowed to tell the truth. In Europe and Canada people are dragged to court for telling the truth about islam.” So notes an article, A Warning to America, in The Brussels Journal on the anti-Islam Dutch politician Geert Wilders (from a speech he recently gave in Nashville).
Like many such publications, it fails to see the internal rot that feminism is, and blames the state of Europe on Islam. It fails to ask the hard questions about how Islam became so powerful so quickly in Europe. Millions of abortions? Harmful and insanely costly feminist-inspired social engineering? Sham divorces and millions of fatherless kids? Pushy entitled women crowding men out of the job market, forcing men into second-classdom? Nah, can’t be any of that.
“Because you are still allowed to tell the truth.” Since when are men allowed to tell the truth about feminism in western countries? Aside from MRA blogs, nowhere. Why doesn’t he mention that in Canada, America, and Europe men are “dragged to court” because of false accusations from their own women? Why the denial, the silence, of what is happening to western men? Why the indifference?
“I am currently standing in court like a common criminal for saying that islam is a dangerous totalitarian ideology rather than a religion,” Wilders claims. He continues: “Last week, my friend Lars Hedegaard, a journalist from Denmark, was fined because in a private conservation, which was recorded without his knowing, he had criticised the way women are treated in islamic societies.” How many falsely-accused men stand in court “like a common criminal”?
He presents himself as a defender of women, as if that is heroic, as if western women are worth fighting for, as if they are innocent. Western women constitute the gravest danger to men, freedom, the truth, and the west itself, yet they fall under the protection of these men. Go figure.
This is how blind Wilders is to the plight of western men: “The day when America follows the example of Europe and Canada and introduces so-called “hate speech crimes” which is only used to punish people who are critical of islam, that day America will have lost its freedom.” What about the numerous empty crimes that western women, “free women,” are using to send their own men to jail? Ironically, hate speech crimes should be used against feminists, but are used to buttress their movement.
Again, whose fault is it that Europe is in the following situation, Islam, or the xxxxing satanic feminists who pushed abortion and the encagement of men?: “I wish I could take you all on a visit to my country and show you what Europe has become. It has changed beyond recognition as a result of mass immigration. And not just any mass immigration, but mass immigration driven by the dangerous force of islam.”
Before Europe and the west was changed because of Islam, it had already changed due to feminism. That was a silent, invisible change, because it was so slow and men were so broad-sided by it. Undermining the family and men’s place in society predates Islam’s growth in Europe.
Wilder’s way of thinking makes a hash out of the present realities, and helps no one to understand the current situation in the west. Feminism and Marxism, the twin heads of the devil, have destroyed western civilization. Selfish, perpetually man-hating women have brought this on. Islam has simply been moving into a cultural, spiritual, and moral vacuum – brought on by liberals such as Wilders.
Wilders: “Islam is an ideology of conquest.” Really? What about feminism within western countries, taking over every institution, including the family itself, which makes it impossible for men to seek justice and cover anywhere. Even our closest allies, our families, have turned their backs on us? Can I depend on my 3 feminist sisters? Not xxxxing likely. They would enjoy my demise. And feminism, through the UN and western governments, pushes itself onto the peoples and cultures of Africa, Asia, and everywhere else it can. What about preferential treatment for women in Haiti after the recent disaster there, used as a way to disempower men? Is that not the characteristic of “an ideology of conquest”?
“Only two weeks ago, the British press revealed how the so-called “London Taliban” is threatening to kill women who do not wear veils in the London borough of Tower Hamlets.” Why, thanks for your concern for women. Have you shown any concern for men falsely accused of rape, or driven out of their homes and families by their own (bored, vindictive) wives? We men are literally being pushed out of our own society, and Wilders is calling for us to defend this society. Thanks. Where do I sign up?
Sharia law would be more favorable to men and their family problems than the current feminist-dominated laws. Isn’t that the real reason for Islam’s progress in the west? Yet not a peep from Wilders about vindictive, misandrist feminists, the real destroyers of the west.
“Polls show that the influence of those Muslims who live according to islam’s aggressive requirements is growing, especially among young people. ” What? Young people should be inspired by the empty, consumeristic, anti-family, anti-male, female-chauvinist society? Fuck off.
Wilders continues: “In my own country, the Netherlands, sharia is being applied by the courts in cases relating to divorce, child custody, inheritance, and property ownership. Women are always the victims of this because sharia discriminates women.” This one really takes the xxxxing cake. Men like Wilders are deaf dumb and blind to the curse that western women have created, and that men live under. Islam is not the problem. Feminists are. Entitled western women are the xxxxing problem. What’s the matter with men like Wilders, so unable to see the reality staring him in the face? Why shouldn’t men turn to sharia law? Why would they stick with western family and criminal law that punishes them simply for being men?
“Defenders of freedom” such as Wilders exhibit an astonishing blindness to the real enemy.
Posted by Alcuin at 7:02 AM Email This