National Review
The key to understanding Anders Breivik is that he measured himself as a man against the Knights Templar and the Teutonic Knights.
What would a Templar Knight do in this situation? I’m quite sure that Breivik wrestled with the question and followed it to the logical conclusion.
Do you know who Breivik didn’t measure himself against? The gelded little eunuchs in BRA’s media like Roger Cohen, these disgusting little cultural termites, who really are eunuchs and traitors and worms who are only fit to be thrown off the digital equivalent of the Tarpeian Rock.
Killing them is a complete waste of time. No one believes their bullshit anymore. Ridiculing them, labeling them for what they really are, and mocking them relentlessly will suffice as a solution to destroy their legitimacy – if conservatives would only do that, then men like Anders Breivik wouldn’t be forced to resort to more desperate measures.
Let’s take a page out of Breivik’s book and measure ourselves against the great men of the past. Why not start with the greatest man in Western history, Caesar Augustus:
His first act: Augustus cleaned out the Augean stables.
Is Caesar Augustus a moral monster? Well yes, if you subscribe to BRA’s progressive morality, and BRA’s historical narrative that Barney Frank represents “progress” and Jesse Jackson is our “moral evangel,” then Caesar Augustus was a dictator and a moral monster for purging the establishment of his time, as are virtually all the great men of Western history.
Watch that video. I’m telling you it is great. See especially how Augustus denounced his rival Mark Anthony as an Egyptian who was no longer a Roman. Such moral clarity. That is the epitome of conservative leadership in action.
Under BRA and Eurabia, which are ruled by eunuchs like Roger Cohen and Gordon Brown, greatness is impossible. We are suffocating under leaders like Barack Hussein Obama – a mere community organizer – who don’t even rise to the level of mediocrity.
What about George Washington? I can think of all kinds of objections. George Washington was a traitor. He was a slaveowner. He slaughtered Indians. He discriminated against women. The Continental Army practiced the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy.
Here is my favorite. This one is most applicable to you.
What about Martin Luther at the Diet of Worms? A morally upright man following his conscience – the greatest reformer in Western history, founder of Protestantism – or a “violent extremist” and a fanatic creating a climate of hate? The SPLC would have certainly condemned Luther and found even more faults with his writings than the Inquisition.
We are growing weary of pretending that Chinua Achebe belongs in Great Books class with Dante or that Barack Hussein Obama is a real president like George Washington. The burden of going along with BRA’s all consuming fantasy ideology and sticking to its predestined script has become unbearable.
Anders Breivik was absolutely right that Cultural Marxism is destroying Western civilization. NO MORE FIDDLING WHILE ROME AMERICA BURNS.
Who the Hell is Chinua Achebe and why is his name being used in the same breath as the immortal Dante?!
Mr Achebe is/was an African writer who is best known for his novel “Things Fall Apart”. It’s about Africa.
Achebe’s book is required reading for high school students in BRA, most of whom will never encounter Dante in their school curriculum or even know he exists.
Is Mr. Cohen a character from Prof. MacDonald’s trilogy on the role of the Jews in the destruction of the West?
I’m not sure what lesbian poet American school children are forced to learn about now. George Washington Carver, Martin Luther King, and Rosa Parks are now more recognizable and familiar to American children than Augustus, Plato, and Luther.
That says it all.
Not quite. Certain WNs who should know better are making an icon out of a Jew-loving Zionist sociopath who murdered 60 anti-Yizroel white kids. Never mind his narcissistic writings; look at what he did. And the net effect: further multicult aggrandizement at our espense.
(1) As I have stated many times, I am not a White Nationalist.
(2) A defining characteristic of certain strains of White Nationalism is an obsession with Jews that makes no rational sense. By that I mean the perverse logic that “Muslims are good” because “Jews are bad” and “Israel is bad” because it is Jewish.
Why are the Jews said to be bad?
Because they are promoting racial suicide. Well, that is exactly what the Norwegian Labor Party was doing on that island, but since they are White communists who are preaching racial suicide instead of Jews, they are “60 anti-Yizroel white kids” instead of just being the Norwegian antifa.
Tim Wise hates Israel. Does that mean he is on our side?
(3) The Hitler worshipers were marginalized before this happened.
(4) I haven’t seen any evidence at all that multiculturalism has been strengthened. Quite the opposite.
@ “…who murdered 60 anti-Yizroel white kids.”
Not so sure…
Posted on VNN:
Posted at MR:
Two points.
First, you’re not going to overthrow BRA and the current regime of “cultural Marxism” unless you change the zeitgeist in a certain way. The fundamental battle is at the level of things “everybody knows” — once a debatable precept becomes beyond debate, you’ve won. Thus leftist hostility to even discussing race and IQ. They much prefer a situation in which George W. Bush and Barack Obama agree that differences in school performance.
The sort of atrocity that Breivik perpetrated made mainstreaming your ideas ever more difficult. In addition to having moral qualms about mass murder, you really ought to be steaming mad that he made it ever harder to mainstream your ideas. This is true especially if you think he was right.
Second point: comparing a steroid-pumping lone wolf nutcase like Breivik to George Washington and Augustus Caesar is absurd. Yes, both Caesar and Washington used political violence. But they weren’t lone wolfs; both were leaders of men. They had armies behind them. And both used effective violence, not pointless slaughter.
Hey Hunter,
I am a newbe to your site and must say that you make some eloquent and excellent points.
Not that I agree with all of them. But I digress.
Check out these videos put out by Euro patriots. They are well done and should be disseminated to a wider audience.
Europe in 2029
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THrltK9cGo8&feature=feedf
Xenophobia is not a disease. It’s natural. Xenophilia is the disease. Leftist multicultural fight against xenophobia and nationalism is a fight against the immune system of our society.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4hlpIX8WrE
History of political correctness and modern leftism (first part) Good explanation of cultural Marxism. Seems to bash Jews a bit though.
http://www.youtube.com/user/whiteMedia4#p/a/u/0/gR3BrcrREbE
Cultural Marxism part 2
I heard they are thinking of charging Anders Breivik with genocide
This is what is so strange: Anders committed genocide against the white anti-white elites, while they commit genocide against white people. So why aren’t the white anti-white elites in jail with Anders? They brought all the rapists into Norway. They Demand all white countries and only white countries be flooded with millions of foreigners, until white people disappear. They want White GeNOcide. So why aren’t they in jail with Anders?
Anyone know why?
FROM EMAIL:
I wonder whether Breivik’s “anti-racism” was merely a front.??
Breivik IS a race realist. I suspect that he has at least 150 pages in his manifesto on race. I also suspect that he read HBD blogs. ??
Go to his manifesto and do a search for ‘genotype’ or ‘nordic’ or ‘race-mixing’ or ‘genes’. He defends ethnonationalism. ??
This from his manifesto suggests he cared about race:??
“In any case, we need to get over this taboo as soon as possible because it is estimated that the Nordic genotypes will be extinct completely within 200 years. This is mainly due to intermarriage between Nordics and non-Nordics. Multiculturalist doctrines have speeded this “indirect extermination process” up further in many Western European countries so the extinction might happen sooner. F example the Norwegian cultural Marxist government has created a vast network of asylum camps all over the country?(and in historically isolated small towns and villages) which will contribute to accelerate this process substantially. The Nordic genotypes might be wiped out within 200 years and yet not a single counter-measure has been employed to prevent this from happening due to the fact that it is considered politically incorrect.”
Regarding Breivik’s zionism, was it merely a front?
From email:
Was Breivik’s “zionism” merely a front?
So says blogger Conservative Swede: “Any [European] white right-wing group critical of MC/PC/Immigration/Islam must protect itself from Nazi charges by putting the support of Israel and the Jewish people among its top objectives.”
http://conswede.blogspot.com/2011/07/nazification-spells-and-philosemitic.html
…
Norwegians ought to think twice about interjecting the word “genocide” into the debate, their left wing of politics and their political correctness are nothing but a campaign of genocide.
We need to understand that the term “multicultural” is the smiley face of “multiracial.” We know from experience that any multicultural group is determined to exclude any of the diverse white Americans, for example, who have a decent sense of self-respect.
Multicultural doctrine dictates that the only good white person is what is known as an “ally” and that is how we are supposed to behave…someone who won’t rage on TV as a white American parent when their child is a victim of multiracialism, and someone who accepts a subservient role to people of color and other demographics.
Even though it is not a racial issue, an excellent example is the “Gay-Straight Alliance” groups in high schools. The straight students are meant to be allies to the gay students, not equal by any means. The same thing happens with black, brown, and yellow students…it is their interests that white students are to uphold in declining to have white campus clubs while supporting with student fees the clubs of everyone else. Small examples? No, just small chips in a huge mosaic illustrating the true nature of multiculturalism.
Because of these realities on the ground, we need to understand that multiculturalism is a fraud and is really a kind of multiracialism seeking to unite self-defined victim groups and all people of color into a new kind of society, one we diverse white Americans will not like very much at all, much like our ancestors’ experiences under Mongol, Turk, and Arab rule in Europe as each of those groups took a leading role in taxing and enslaving the diverse white Europeans over centuries, even concurrently during the great age of European exploration.
First, you’re not going to overthrow BRA and the current regime of “cultural Marxism” unless you change the zeitgeist in a certain way. The fundamental battle is at the level of things “everybody knows” — once a debatable precept becomes beyond debate, you’ve won
Yes, the zeitgeist. Capturing the zeitgeist is the business of MindWar. Not hot lead and cold steel this time around. It’s all about the zeitgeist.
Roger Cohen wrote:
European Christendom in this context is a mirror image of the idealized caliphate of Osama bin Laden. It is a dream-world cause through which to enlist the masses in apocalyptical warfare against an “infidel” enemy supposedly threatening the territory, morals and culture of an imagined community of devout believers.
Just like Israel, Roger. You get your ideal tribal nation state, but we don’t? Fuck you Roger Cohen.
“Was Breivik’s “zionism” merely a front?
So says blogger Conservative Swede: “Any [European] white right-wing group critical of MC/PC/Immigration/Islam must protect itself from Nazi charges by putting the support of Israel and the Jewish people among its top objectives.”
Do you think Breivik cared whether he was seen as a neo-Nazi? I think he was beyond such considerations. His sympathy towards the Jewish ethnostate and its ruthless treatment of its enemies is genuine. The ethnocentric, nationalist, and racist Jews aren’t the problem. As a matter of fact, multiculti Jews hate Israel and wish its destruction. See for example Max Blumenhal.
Omigod, this is a priceless droppnig from NY Times Cohen:
Yes, her “artistry” is indeed degenerate, cosmopolitan trash. What proud or even just normal White parents want their daughters to grow up to be like Amy Winehouse? Winehouse probably negatively influenced millions of European descended girls at a tender age. It’s good to see Cohen putting a nice yellow star on himself and serving us all notice and reminders that he is someone who believes in the continued degeneration of European culture and denigration and racial suicide of European-descended children.
Interesting from Michael Hoffman’s blog:
QUOTE:
Thirteen typical Israeli blog responses to the terror attack in Norway
1. There’s no getting away from it, Norway, was always against the state of Israel it’s not new and never will be!! We’re not in favor of the attack but to say that maybe they’ll understand us better after what happened is entirely legitimate!!!
2. Enough demagoguery! The Norwegians and Europe generally are super-anti-Semitic. So 100 people were killed there are 7 billion more people in the world. I don’t pity them they’re my enemies they hate Israel so they have it coming!!!
3. The whole world dances on Jewish blood. Europe is the same Europe and even more anti-Semitic. The killer is right!!! Europe is defeated, Norwegians are becoming a minority.
4. Ha Ha Ha! Europeans, this is your “liberalism.”
5. Let them eat what they cooked.
6. Good news for Shabbat (the Sabbath). So may they increase and learn the hard way.
7. Allow me a few moments of pleasure.
8. I’m sorry, it doesn’t move me. From my point of view, let them drown in blood.
9. The boy wanted to send a message. Extreme, yes, but they don’t understand anything else.
10. Coming soon to all the Norwegians. And all the Europeans.
11. You leftists have to be wiped out too. And it will happen soon.
12. Norway’s Anti-Semitism did not make it immune.
13. Norway is one of the most antisemitic countries.
END QUOTE
Jews take any act whatsoever and ask, is it good for the Jews? Whites take any act, check for ideological purity, and distance themselves immediately. Anything less than the Lamb of God going to slaughter and they want nothing to do with it.
Chess is a mind war. Destruction of a people is real war. Even if nobody is fighting back.
We know that until whites are capable of writing like those Jews about an act like this, we will lose. Our only redemption is what we leave for the next generation. Will they be able to create and practice white culture or will they have a boot stuck in their face forever?
How many here would DARE write things as bold as the Jews? In what was once OUR OWN COUNTRY!
Well, here we’re doing ok. But overall?
the guerilla must win the hearts and minds of the people, and be able to swim among them like fish in the sea, before he can win a guerilla war.
in other words, we must capture the zeitgeist before we can even begin fighting back.
The point being that this act needs to be ridden hard, like a rhetorical race horse, just like the Jews ride, regardless of the Masonic angle. If we can’t even learn to ride, we’re never going to get anywhere. And I mean learn to ride YESTERDAY.
We can’t capture the Zeitgeist unless we can ride like the Jews.
Strictly speaking, what happened in Norway is a legitimate dispute between ethnic Norwegians. People like Cohen don’t have a say in its outcome since it is about ethnic self-determination.
Spooky,
We need ethnically minded pissed off white people. Simple as that. Then we’ll start getting some where. These (our fellow white sheeple) fuckers aren’t pissed off enough yet, and they’re going to have to get smacked around some more.
The whole world dances on White blood.
Just trying it on for size.
Hunter,
I’m thinking Christianity is looking more and more like the a vehicle by which we can mount an EFFECTIVE racial defense.
I like the music of Varg Vikernes, but Breivik (whose name sounds to me like brave) accomplished something Vikernes only dreams of.
Whatever ends up winning the day for Whites, it’s going to look a whole lot like the traditional Catholic Church. They didn’t do it that way for kicks.
I prophesy that if Breivik lives long enough, he will become a Mandela sort of figure for Norway.
That’s a great point. Free Nelson Mandela!
You know if Breivik was a Jew and his victims white conservatives, he wouldn’t serve a day.
His sympathy towards the Jewish ethnostate and its ruthless treatment of its enemies is genuine. The ethnocentric, nationalist, and racist Jews aren’t the problem. As a matter of fact, multiculti Jews hate Israel and wish its destruction. See for example Max Blumenhal.
Friedrich Braun is correct here. Many multiculturalists (those I have personally encountered) have identified Israel as the last bastion of old-fashioned Western colonialism. Whether or not this is literally true is not the point, the point is that they passionately believe it to be true. At any rate, just as these ‘lestists’, if you will, express solidarity with colonized peoples the world over, some people with racialist sympathies find it makes sense to show rhetorical solidarity with Israel which, in some ways, is an embodiment of that which American, European and Australian whites seek for their own lands. (I personally find the fascist/authoritarian model a dangerous proposition myself, but some might say that regardless of sentiment an extreme model is probably a necessary evil to regain control of white nations).
It bears repeating, also, that Jews are an ethnic group with a range of opinions just as any other group and that, while the majority are liberals, many are not and would be sympathetic with the aims of racialists but for the Judeo-skeptical aspects of the far-right, historically speaking. Regardless of this historical tension, some kind of solidarity between white racialists and Jews may not be a bad thing, if such a thing could be achieved (and I am not convinced that it could, but at least FB’s ideas should not be dismissed out of hand).
I believe it is totally impossible for whites and Jews to live together, unless Whites want to adopt Judaism (probably not a bad evolutionary strategy, really). But as long as Jews and Freemasons are the only ones willing to do the dirty work, far be it from me to discourage them. We can sort the rest out later.
Hypothetically speaking, of course.
Zeitgeist is the goal yes. But what about this insightful article in hammer andan vilmy blog:
http://hammerandanvilmyblog.wordpress.com/2011/07/27/the-breivik-action-the-first-archeofuturist-victory-©/
China Achebe’s “Things Fall Apart” is pretty inspirational, actually. It’s very right-wing at its heart, despite some boilerplate liberalism to keep the SWPL academes excited about it.
That being said, there are plenty of examples of mediocre literature by African-Americans, women, Irish-Americans and other minority groups. These are prized by the SWPL academes and the “teachable moment” high school teacher-morons. Then there is white liberal idealist literature like “To Kill a Mockingbird” which is actually pretty bad if you read it with any depth.
The point is, as always, that what the herd wants is stupid. The herd wants to do ineffective and pointless things. The Caesars among us want to raise us up and punish the stupid while rewarding the good. That’s like natural selection, and people are afraid of it — or, I should say, mediocre people are.
If you look at the IQ charts, 62% of white people are too dumb to have their votes count for anything. 100% of SWPLs are too “borderline personality disorder” quasi-sociopath narcissistic to have their votes count for anything. Yet they all vote, and they all like inert, directionless, self-parasitizing governments.
Something about low self-confidence, self-pity, hatred of life and total solipsism makes them do this. It’s the intersection of those mild dysfunctions that creates a greater dysfunction, like a chord of personality failure. That is what makes them full on passive-aggressive indirect sociopaths, manipulators and saboteurs of anything more ambitious than “buy the best stuff you can.”
Kievsky,
Before you draw conclusions about the usefulness of Christianity as a vehicle for White racial preservation, you need to read the Breivik manifesto.
First, in the name of Christian Universalism, for instance, he advocates treating all Christians as Europeans, no matter what their race, and even bringing non-White Christians into his Templar Crusade.
Basically, Breivik’s concern for preserving Nordics is trumped by his Christian universalism. If all the Muslims in Norway converted to Christianity, he would have no objection to them.
Second, in the name of Christian univeralism, Breivik envisions crusades into the Middle East to help the local Middle Eastern Christians. So Europeans will spill their blood to help the genetic first cousins to Europe’s Muslim invaders, so long as the beneficiaries are Christians.
This is the logic of Christian universalism at work. Blood is particular. But Christianity is universal. Blood is natural. But Christianity aims higher than nature. Thus Christian brotherhood always trumps and undermines blood brotherhood.
It was Herecles who cleaned out the Augean Stables. But it still works. He was a man among men as they said about the Selous Scouts.
In true Christian tradition, Truth trumps all. So a truth like genetic biodiversity would never be buried. The Church functioned well enough for centuries without needing to destroy local ethnicities. The fact that the Mass was the same everywhere didn’t mean the culture outside the Mass was the same. This kind of universalism burying Truth is modern heresy, peddled by Jews who want to be the only people left with an identity, and put into practice by counter-church builders the Freemasons.
Just because Breiviks brand of Protestantism isn’t what we want doesn’t mean there isn’t one.
Zippy,
(1) I’ve said for years now that lone wolf attacks make little sense. I have spent years drawing a distinction between the actions of legitimate sovereign bodies – such as states and communities – and the actions of vanguardists.
(2) No one has disputed the morality of Breivik’s actions. Not even Breivik himself who said his actions were “atrocious.” Yet the whole internet seems compelled to recite in great unison – isn’t that horrible – as if the point hasn’t already been made. Not even the killer disputed it!
(3) Breivik hasn’t discredited the “counter-jihad” movement anymore than John Brown discredited “anti-slavery” in 1859 in the Harper’s Ferry raid. On the contrary, his actions will only accelerate the final crisis over the issue.
(4) Americans don’t care about what happens in Norway. We care far more about the Casey Anthony trial than Anders Breivik. The only thing Americans are talking about now is the debt ceiling crisis.
(5) As I said last night, while the whole mainstream right was in panicked lockdown on Monday and the SPLC was mounting the podium to decry “rightwing extremism,”#Fuckyouwashington got 64,000 tweets in a single day and Obama’s base was crumbling.
BTW, those who are denouncing Breivik as a philo-Semitic Zionist obviously haven’t bothered to read the manifesto.
He has a very nuanced take on the Jewish Question. He says that in Norway about 90 percent of the traitors are White Gentiles, but it varies in other countries, as 8/10 Jews in Europe live in Britain and France.
He clearly says that America has a Jewish problem. He went his “Class A” and “Class B” traitors regardless of whether they were Jewish or Gentile. I’m quite sure that he said that something like over 50 percent of Jews were traitors.
Breivik didn’t target by ethnicity. Instead, he saw himself as the punisher of traitors and war criminals. He also said that Hitler should have cooperated with Britain and France to send all the Jews back to Israel.
Spooky, it is possible to hold conflicting values without problems as long as they are merely in one’s mind, as abstractions never tested in the real world. The problems emerge when you try to live by them, then they actually do come into conflict, and you actually do have to decide which value trumps which.
Say that you are a devout Christian, and your daughter wants to marry a devout Black Nigerian Christian. You now have a conflict between blood-based values and Christian universal values.
Which is more important to you: maintaining genetic distinctness or honoring the universal community of the church? If a Black man is worthy of sharing heaven with you, through accepting Jesus Christ as his savior, then why should be not be worthy of sharing the same neighborhood with you, the same public transportation, the same church, the same water fountain — or holy wedlock with your sister? Or do you think that there will be Jim Crow in heaven?
Greg,
I think we should use the resources of the Christian churches and infiltrate them and just be racialists within them when it comes to it. Let the Christians either back down, or disfellowship us — force the hand.
I think it’s better to take some ground, and either hold it or be driven off of it, than never to take some ground at all.
The problem with the purist heathen WN’s is that they don’t actually occupy any real world territory. Whereas WN infiltrators into churches can actually gain some ground, and then stand and be courageous when it’s time to hold it. We are more fanatic than ordinary people, we can use that.
I say that we marry reason with fanaticism. There’s a lot of Christian fanatics we can work with, and their racial instinct will over-ride Christian universalism. If some pastor or church lady tries to quote Galatians at us (neither Jew nor Greek), we’ll just laugh at them.
As to Greg’s idea that Christianity is incompatible with White racial consciousness, it exposes his deep ignorance of American history.
Wasn’t it Christian Virginia and Christian Maryland that pioneered the anti-miscegenation laws? Didn’t we have anti-miscegenation laws in America from the 1640s to the 1960s? Wasn’t it White Christians who conquered the North American continent and built the United States?
If Christianity is incompatible with White racial consciousness, why is there a positive correlation between the two? Why are evangelical Christians the most “racist” Whites in America?
What’s more, if my recollection is accurate, it was the secular universities, not the churches, that led the charge against “racism” in America; the universities were captured by these fanatics long before the churches.
The Southern Baptist Convention didn’t repudiate “racism” until the mid-1990s.
Now that Christianity has died in Britain, it should a flourishing oasis of White racial consciousness, as Christians are the problem – there are no atheists, no agnostics, no secular liberals at Harvard and Yale who are evangels of the gospel of anti-racism.
If Christianity is incompatible with White racial consciousness, then why didn’t Jesus himself tackle the subject of “racism.” Couldn’t the church fathers have clearly said at any time that “racism” was incompatible with nationalism?
Strangely enough, it was the communists who coined the term “racism,” and it was the communist vanguard that sowed this idea (in the 1920s and 1930s) that “racism” is immoral.
Greg’s opposition to Christianity is rooted in its “homophobia.”
Counter-Currents is actually something of a running commentary on all the reasons why “White Nationalism” is marginalized: too abstract, too esoteric, too full of kooky material, too aloof and contemptuous of the masses, obsessed with Jews, wedded to Nazism and fantasies, anti-Christian, no realistic strategy or even a desire to communicate with White Americans, no interest in the pressing issues of our times, inability to connect, etc.
Hunter, you can’t refute theological-philosophical arguments about principles by citing historical facts about the beliefs of confused people who did not grapple with the theological and philosophical points I am making either. It is just an attempt to change the subject in the guise of answering an objection. But you know better than that.
Christianity will not be dead until its secular offspring, liberal universalism, is dead as well. But you know that, don’t you?
Kievsky, Christian fanatics are precisely the ones who believe that blood differences don’t matter. One can work with lukewarm or confused Christians, or people who are racists first and Christians second. But you can’t work with real Christians, because they take their supernatural universalism seriously, which pits them against blood brotherhood wherever and whenever it conflicts with the supernatural brotherhood in Christ which is the Church.
The article “The Breivik Action: The First Archeofuturist Victory” starts being discussed at MR:
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/the_breivik_action_the_first_archeofuturist_victory/
Quote:
“As of this date, the initial burst of media coverage and all related conspiracy theories, second-guessing, conjecture, projection, etc. circulating in cyberspace are superfluous and, all things considered, useless.”