Connecticut: The Color of Crime


In Connecticut, African-Americans are 10.1 percent of the population, but are responsible for 38 percent of homicide, 33 percent of rape, 51 percent of robbery, 38 percent of aggravated assault, and 22 percent of burglary

Source: Crime in Connecticut, 2004

Note: OD is fleshing out the “Color of Crime” series with lots of new entries. Readers are encouraged to use the FBI’s State UCR Directory to help us track down statistics for states and cities. Big targets include Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio, and New York.

I’ve already found and published the data on Texas, Florida, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Arkansas in the Citizens’ Informer. Those states will be added to the “Color of Crime” tab within the next two weeks.

About Hunter Wallace 12380 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent


  1. Any time I see ‘Connecticut’ I skip on to something else, as it likely has no importance for me. So I missed this at first. Now I see that blacks are 10.1% of the population there? That’s considerably higher than I would’ve guessed. But I consider it good news.

    None of us know how the next few years will play out. I imagine we all expect tumultuous times. Should the Washington government, as a result of its financial problems, become less able to deliver the goodies, and the states move into that vacuum as many here think likely, consider the following plan.

    I don’t mean this as a ‘big solution’ to our problems but it’s something that I believe would benefit the South in the future.

    We all know the story of Detroit, right? Build an industry, put up a ‘welcome to all comers’ sign, get invaded and then destroyed. The State of Michigan made some big mistakes in its history, but we all have. Whites in Michigan have historically just signed up and followed orders, as, sadly, we do nowadays. They are not our enemies. Aside from the tribe that currently holds the purse strings, our historical enemies, the blues, the liberal do-gooders, the useful idiots, the DWLs, the Gentile version of God’s chosen, the deceived deceivers, we know where they have been based for hundreds of years. They still are. It must be in the water supply.

    I’d like to come up with a plan to make New England attractive to blacks, the way Detroit was. Particularly the states of Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island. So attractive that those states become as overwhelmingly black as Detroit is now. Obviously this would relieve the South from a burden it has shouldered for too long.

    Of course moving Africans entirely off the continent would be the best thing for us. But that will be a long time coming, no matter what power shifts occur. Even my idea put into practice would take at least two or three decades to show tangible results. I see it as an intermediate step that not only helps the South but that also puts a heavy damper on a big segment of the US population that always opposes our interests, even to the detriment of their own. I also suspect that those states would join this effort, at least until it was too late to turn back. That has been their way. I wish Southern leaders had picked up on the Detroit example a century ago. Alas, they thought the animals were tamed and that the suicidal Whites up there would not launch another war on us. Heh.

    I know, I know, why purposely further despoil an area that has less of a BRA problem. Because I can see the South, instead, becoming that problem free. I’d rather it was, than New England. And I don’t care what it does to New England. Let it be renamed New Africa. Anyway, it kills, or at least mangles, two or more birds with one stone.

    I know that there are some here who live in the northeast and I don’t expect them to like this idea. But I’m not interested in their opinions. What do y’all down here think?

  2. bill as a “yankee” i’d like to point out that the entire nigrification of detroit was related to the development of the auto industry and the use of a white male draft syste, which cause greater labor shortages. also niggers move up here directly due to the “birth of a nation” revival of southern white nationalism in the early 20’s. the michiganders were diametrically opposed to black encroachment, im pretty sure even ford was. there were never “everybody is welcome signs” put up, they, like the mexicans came up for the jobs and stayed for the welfare systems that developed in the coming decades. all of these things were not in the hands of “yankees” they were decided either A) federally (new deal fo blacks, housing covenant shit, draft system) or B) a-politically (expansion of the auto/defense industry). these shots were called by a select few, not all of them jews, some of them were indeed “yanko-irish/anglos”, but not all of them, and certainly not the denizens of early detroit, cleveland and milwalkee, all of whom were flooded with niggers in the 20’s. i understand that it is totally pointless to argue the finer points on a blog devoted to “southern nationalism”, but essentially you are in my opinion forgetting that the only true conservative culture in america, the only one that tried to survive is dixie. now all americans can appeal to the anti-federal, pro-white, and traditionalist society of dixie, the entire “euro-white nation” inside of america could appeal to dixie, as it is the only white man’s nation in america in the last 100 years.

  3. The color of hate crimes:

    Racial bias
    In 2010, law enforcement agencies reported that 3,725 single-bias hate crime offenses were racially motivated. Of these offenses:

    ?69.8 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.
    ?18.2 percent stemmed from anti-white bias.
    ?5.7 percent were a result of bias against groups of individuals consisting of more than one race (anti-multiple races, group).
    ?5.1 percent resulted from anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
    ?1.2 percent were motivated by anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias. (Based on Table 1.) … d-offenses

Comments are closed.