Rural Americans For Obama

July 4, 2012 Hunter Wallace BRA Politics, Politics 68

American Midwest

Obama is casting out some bait for Midwesterners like Matt Parrott on his YouTube channel:

Note: I didn’t see anything in here about how Goldman Sachs was Obama’s biggest campaign contributor or the free trade agreements he signed with Panama, Columbia, and South Korea.

About Hunter Wallace 12392 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

50 Comments

  1. I still remember one particular clip I watched during the 2008 election cycle. It was two white West Virginians talking to a reporter when one of them states “well, I guess I’m gonna have to vote for the nigger.” There’s a lot of whites that still feel that way.

  3. Snowhitey says: …… “well, I guess I’m gonna have to vote for the nigger.” There’s a lot of whites that still feel that way. …

    Why would they have to vote for him?

  4. Gullible diehard Democrats who ALWAYS vote the party. Ditto with diehard Republicans. Track records mean nothing for some voters.

  8. I can see Obama pressing the flesh in the heartland. “How are you doing, sir? I hate America and white people, and I’d appreciate your vote in November.”

  9. Obama knows something that diehard neo Confederates don’t. The midwest is America. Has been since the Erie Canal. If you want to succeed at anything on this continent, you need the midwest on board. Obama is engaged in cheap pandering. The midwest needs to be taught they are a separate nation who shares nothing with DC and New York, and that in addition to that, the aforementioned are parasitic millstones dragging them asunder and have been since 1860.

  10. Why would they vote for McCain? Or Romney? I can see them voting for a populist like Pat Buchanan, but Romney? GTFO.

  11. I’m laughing at Jim, we know the mid west is part of america; that’s why we don’t want it or need it. unionist and yankees act as if we care about or want to be americans. They fail to understand at all levels that we don’t want anything to do with america or the union

  13. true enough, but it clearly shows how little you understand the Southron Separatist mindset when did the mid west do us any favors? Why should we want them as part of our nation? those are the basic questions yankees never have an answer for

  16. Not me, but Jim seems to be making the case for it. not sure why they wouldn’t want there own nation state responsive to their unique set of needs, circumstances etc etc

  17. true enough, but it clearly shows how little you understand the Southron Separatist mindset when did the mid west do us any favors? Why should we want them as part of our nation? those are the basic questions yankees never have an answer for

    You are suffering from tunnel vision.

    You don’t need us as a part of Dixie, but you do need our political capital. The South’s loss was preordained because they lacked political capital. The North had it, and they spent it. In 1860 the midwest had legitimate concerns with the spread of slavery, and none were founded on moralizing or John Brown’s body. They had rational economic concerns, and the radical abolitionists CAPITALIZED on them.

    The south has arguably less political capital today than it did in 1860, and unless they form some sort of understanding with other states who have similar concerns with the out of control Federal beast, nothing will come of anything. I hear all about the vaunted “Ulster Scots”, but how many self-identify as such today? Could you even start a baseball league, let alone a nation?

    Any secessionist movement needs all the help it can get. There is no specter of wage-depressing “free slave labor” looming over Midwest industry or agriculture as there was in 1860. Far from it, the wage depressing is coming from New York and DC, not Alabama. The midwest and near west “red” states have FAR more in common with the South today than they did in 1860. One would be a fool not to capitalize on that. Study Bismark if you need pointers.

  19. I’m perfectly fine with remaining American and seeing this put right again, or perish in the trying. Why should proud, loyal Americans surrender our great nation, it’s name, and it’s history, to some cheap little gang of Jew parasites, lobotomized DWL’s, and their black and brown mercenaries? After everything my young country has survived up to this point? No. Fucking. Way. It’s just not in my spirit to give up, and my people are better than that.

  21. They are hopelessly stuck in the past. If the commenters here are the best the south has to offer, they are forever lost and succession will just be their ever lasting fantasy.
    Pathetic bunch.

  24. “They are fools, Jim.”

    They’re the George Baileys of American politics. Carefully attending to their ideals while the Henry Potters buy up the whole place. They don’t get that politics isn’t about preserving your way of life, it’s about crushing that of your enemy. All rewards to your people are reaped implicitly.

    On the other hand, people like Hunter seem to get it.

  26. HW is clearly a cut above most of the fools here. I hope he looks into who really dictates policy here in the US, it sure as hell is not northern Whites.

  29. I read here because it interests me. I would like to see the current government fall, not for the same reasons as most here, but I would like to see it go down.
    I would even like to see the south successful break ties. It all needs to be scrapped.
    But most here are too dim to see the real enemies. Media ect.

  31. no we see it, but we also know those things are for yankees, jews, queers, negros etc by yankees, jews queers and aimed mostly at us, and have been aimed at us for generations

    only a yankee thinks disagreeing =’s ignorance

  33. yankees

    Name one. And the ones who wear pinstripes don’t count. I doubt anyone you can come up with remotely resembles any of us. Seriously stone, the ones who best fit your definition of “yankee” today are either niggers, jews or dipshit DWL types. Nobody you find among any of our circles. Your “Yankee” is an anachronism. You might as well be railing against the Philistines.

  34. Ok SL keep cashing your fed checks and being the dupe for the union.
    In your spare time preach southern nationalism. See the irony? Probably not. You are an enemy to your own volk, you keep the union strong.

  38. You say you are a PMC, who the hell signs your checks, the free south?
    The confederate separate states?

  39. I have only voted a few times, I don’t bother usually. It’s all bullshit to me.
    Nor have I ever taken a red cent from the government.

  43. “All this hints at an uncomfortable truth: The suffering associated with poverty is sometimes caused not only by low incomes but also by self-destructive pathologies. In central Kenya, a recently published government study found that men, on average, spent more of their salaries on alcohol than on food. ”

    When republicans point this out Obama accuses them of advocating “social Darwinism”.

  45. We all have a bit of Yankee in us in spite of ourselves. The whole world needs a Yankee purge.

  46. “Inspired by her example, Alfred began growing vegetables and selling them; he turned out to be a shrewd businessman as well. ”

    LOL, nigger sells a tomato, all of a sudden he’s a “shrewd businessmen”. Gotta love the DWL paternalism.

    That article is pure gold to the satirist.

  47. Ever been around real Whites from up north, HW?
    We don’t look anything like that.
    Yankees, I have never met one. I ve met jews and DWLs, but never met an imaginary yankee you here seem to obsess on. Get out of south, take a road trip, you will be suprised.

  49. I would say as a catch-all at this point a Yankee is someone who believes there is a one-size-fits all recipe for American freedom.

    Most of them are Jews. I think of Joe Lieberman, Michael Bloomberg, Barney Frank, Bernie Sanders and the rest of the Usual Suspects.

Comments are closed.