Chicago, IL – it’s late August here in Chicago. The Chicago Cubs are 31 games under .500, 29 1/2 games out of first place. Even dire hard Chicago Cub fans have sadly, come to the realization that….
This wasn’t the year.
The last time the Chicago Cubs won any baseball championship was 1945 – the year we dropped the A bomb on Japan; all of the able bodied, young American men were in military uniforms, not in Chicago Cubs uniforms. It was a 4F, old men season, maybe there will be another one… next year. There’s always next year for Cubs fans.
In a similar vein, this was not the year that Ron Paul or any other Liberatrian, economic conservative broke through and was elected President of the United States – Ron Paul will not be ending the welfare state, reversing the Great Society, the New Deal, ending Medicaid and Social Security, privatizing the entire US public school system, enacting right to work laws in all 50 states, breaking the Teamsters Union, the UAW, the United Mine Workers Union and allowing “American” businesses to hire and fire whoever they want, with wages determined by “free markets”, and the American labor force opened up to 2 billion 3rd world workers, under Libertarian free market principles of open borders immigration.
Ron Paul and his never say die Libertarian supporters made a valiant effort to reach out to Blacks, Hispanics, even Muslim immigrants associated with Al Qaeda 9-11-01 terrorists. Ron Paul was the only GOP presidential candidate to back the Ground Zero Mosque and explain that the 9-11-01 mass murder of our people was an understandable Islamic response to the USA’s mistreatment of the Palestinians and the US having military bases in Saudi Arabia.
All of Ron Paul’s outreach/pandering to Muslim immigrants didn’t result in winning Ron Paul the nomination. Neither did Ron Paul’s pledge to set free all Black African Americans in prison for trafficking in hard drugs like crack cocaine and heroin. Ron Paul and other Libertarian economic Conservatives were polling less than 1 percent amongst Black voters… maybe these Black voters haven’t read enough Austrian free market economics books… or maybe they don’t read any books.
Yeah, this wasn’t the year for Libertarian, economic conservative Presidential candidates or the Chicago Cubs.
American nationalist leader George Rockwell stated in 1966 that Libertarian/economic conservative Presidential candidates were doomed to fail. After the ’64 Goldwater debacle, Rockwell stated with 100 percent assurance that no Libertarian economic conservative Presidential candidate would ever win the support of poor and working class White voters.
But, 45 years later we’ve had to suffer the failures of Jack Kemp, Phil Graham, Steve Forbes, Ron Paul and other Libertarian Party Presidential candidates that no one can remember.
Who ran as the Libertarian Presidential candidate in 1992? Who was the second string catcher for the 1977 Chicago Cubs? Who cares?
No this wasn’t the year for the Chicago Cubs or Libertarian, economic conservative Preidential candidates.
Oh well, there’s always next year. This is for sure….. they’ll be back.
When I first got into Official Whiteness (there are so many terms….) – I loved everybody. The Nazis. The CI folks. The Klan. The Skinheads…
Well I’ve met folks from various factions – and there are good and bad, in all. Just like in any other sphere.
Jack – I am a Paulista. I think the world of Ron Paul (minus the immigration lunacy, natch) I love Rand.
We live in the real world, though. We have to deal with the pickle we are in.
I know the Romney is a Tool of the Hebe….but symbols count. Symbols matter. I LOVe the Pauls – and I think Shirley would make a TERRIFIC National First Mom – but I am still glowing over the last images of last night’s GOP dog and pony show.
I saw a pair of White Aristocrats on stage. I saw beautiful children……..tons of them. The Romneys. amd their crowd, are far far far above the daily fray. They are. It’s simple. The White Genocide has not touched them yet.
But it will. It’s a numbers game, and the Dark Tide threatens every-one. Even rarified creatures like them.
I saw a beautiful couple – a real Patriarch and Matriarch. (He’s freaking 65, and she’s 63. I don’t know if she’s been helped by a surgeon’s knife – but I guarantee he has NEVER had plastic surgery) They have a gorgeous family. They are true partners. They obviously adore each other. They know how to manage their lives. They know how to manage their businesses and money.
This is a Southern Secesh site – and I would be thrilled if the Southrons here-in achieve their goals. For the sake of the South. (Just as long as I get a lifetime passport, and the ability to immigrate, if I can ever convince the Hubster to do so). Just for the sake of the South alone.
But I care about “White”. Whatever the politics of the Romney’s may be – they are a very successful White family.
We need that. Well – you Southern gents may disagree – but I think most White folks really need to SEE what White Success looks like. To be reminded of what we are being conned or bullied into losing.
We are a in a great big Existential ditch. That may well turn into the collective grave of thr White Race. I think the sheer glory of the Romney family, themselves, will attract a lot of young Whites.
When the Negro obscenities the Obamas represent America – they symbolize our fall from grace. I do know decent, good Blacks – but the Obamas AIN’T that. They are NOT good for Blacks, by the way. They are a nightmare.
I know the Founding concept of America was murdered long ago….but when the Obamas appear as the Face of America – I know I am a woman without a Country.
When I saw the Romney’s – a saw my Nation. A glorious White Nation.
P.S – I’d feel the same way if Ron Paul was the President. Or Virgil Goode. I want to see intelligent, capable, successful Whites back in charge of OUR lives. Romney is a START. I know you Dixie folks don’t agree…but he is. We have to climb out of this ditch – and the Romney’s are the first step.
Doing more thinking about lost causes. I can’t remember who it was, though someone of repute, stated that the only causes worth fighting for are lost causes. I’ve had a problem with that, in the back of my mind, ever since. It just clicked. I would restate it as ‘lost causes are those most worth fighting for’. Any of you Republitards get the distinction?
Oh Lord, this “SN” blog is not only occupied by Republitard loyalists, it gives women the pulpit! How goddamned American can you get?
countenance says:
August 31, 2012 at 10:51 pm (Edit)
Another issue:
“Nobody like us will win a major party Presidential nomination for the foreseeable future. ”
Jack Ryan replies:
Such ridiculous nonsense! It was recently said there would never again be a White Heavy weight boxing champion, that “White boys can’t fight”. The reality is that White boxers have dominated the heavier boxing divisions forever ten years.
I’ve won every single political campaign I’ve worked on these last ten years. The key is just to learn what works, what sells and what doesn’t, get good candidates who are the right age, 13 years old is too young, 78 years old is too old. And stop trying to sell Libertarianism, economic conservatism to poor and working Class voters. It just doesn’t sell.
On St Patrick’s Day march with the Irish.
On September 11th, try to find something positive to say about the 300 Spartans, White New York Fire Department men who died climbing up the burning World Trade Centers when everyone else was fleeing in terror…
(Hear that Ron Paul enablers, Sept. 11 th is not the day to try to lecture White Americans that we need to understand the Arab Muslim’s just opposition with American foreign policies)
When campaigning in San Diego CA – don’t mouth off about wanting to do massive budget cuts to the US Navy, same applies for campaigning in Colorado Springs CO to close the US Airforce economy.
When talking with White Evangelical Christians, try not to express great enthusiasm for homosexual marriage equality.
When speaking with Greek Americans, try not to argue that the Turkish Muslim occupation of Greece and the Balkans was a good thing.
With White French people, learn to say “C’est Bon” – try to avoid the common American tourist’s practice of demaning that everybody speak English.
Try to tell White people what they want to hear.
Try to win.
Don’t embrace losing…. Always, always losing.
You don’t want to be a…
Dire hard Chicago Cubs fan.
14 words
Bring back Joe! He was comparatively intellectual.
I don’t think I’m delusional about anything. I think a man who actually stood up and said many of the things we talk about here, and did not apologize or use weasel words and actually advocated a pro white message, would be elected in a landslide.
I do not think there has been anytime in world history that the white, everyday, normal people out here in “flyover” country are more ready to listen to and embrace a pro white leader with the guts and the will to tell the “establishment” and ideological hacks of our time to go and shove it. I believe they are more than ready for it and are looking high and low for such a man to rise up. It is to such a point now that they are backing a Mitt Romney even–a man who lent as much vitality to the people at that Convention as a cast of octogenarian actors would lend to a porno. A real man with the guts could more than fire up our people. And there are still enough of us left to outnumber the opposition.
No, I do not think I am delusional. No, sir.
I’ve won every single political campaign I’ve worked on these last ten years.
Yeah, that’s what we need. Someone who can tell which ticket will be the winner, and will jump aboard. It works especially well in places like Chicago!
Dear Republitards,
Kindly check the top bar on your browser while you’re at the main page of this blog.
Occidental Dissent / Resistance is True Conservatism
Shouldn’t that be replaced with
Occidental Consent / Go Along To Get Along
?
Eastwood had a good line.
“We own this [fkn] country.”
he should have added:
“don’t re-nig.”
I think Jack is too hard on Ron Paul and the libertarians.
First, the libertarians are not monolithic. There are different strains and factions with some factions more friendly to white/Southern interests than others.
Second, Libertarianism is a theory of politics not economics. There is more to libertarianism than economics. Most libertarians emphasize freedom and small government founded on individual rights. Because of this, they generally:
1) oppose an extensive welfare state (hurts non-whites; helps whites)
2) support states’ rights and freedom of association (helps whites)
3) support a non-interventionist foreign policy and oppose uncessary wars ( helps whites; harms Jews; no wars for Zionist Israel; neutrality toward Russia rather than viewing Russia as an enemy).
4) oppose giving the federal reserve control over the money supply (helps whites; harms the financial elites).
5) support civil liberties and oppose police state measures like the NDAA, Patriot Act and TSA pat downs (helps whites)
6) support greatly reduced federal powers (helps Southerners; Ron Paul favors secession in principle)
versus
1) Open borders (greatly harms whites).
2) Economic policy that favors the wealthy over the working class (harms many whites).
Even with the last two points, it’s clear the libertarian agenda has far more upside for whites/Southerners than the Republican or the Democrat agenda.
Jack:
You may have won every race you’ve worked on and within in the last ten years, but none of them were for President. That’s my point, focus on downballot, and maybe one day in the relatively near future, the Presidency will take care of itself.
Jack:
You can’t promise 50 different things to 50 different groups in 50 different cities. In this day and age, someone will start putting your words together and figure out you’re John Kerry. We need to have a single coherent message.
Denise writes:
“When I first got into Official Whiteness (there are so many terms….) – I loved everybody. The Nazis. The CI folks. The Klan. The Skinheads…
Well I’ve met folks from various factions – and there are good and bad, in all. Just like in any other sphere.
Jack – I am a Paulista. I think the world of Ron Paul (minus the immigration lunacy, natch) I love Rand.”
Jack Ryan replies:
OK. I know we good American Christians are not supposed to discuss… (sex). But, Denise in these dark “Latter Days” we can not really on some stork to deliver us the White soldiers and generals to battle the Muslims and the Black hordes from African/Camden New Jersey hells.
So how about spreading the word to worthy White sisters to give their “love” to the Rand Pauls instead of the 78 year old Ron Pauls. Sperm counts and NumbersUSA immigration grades tend to go way down when American Libertarians get over the age of 75.
Neo-Confederate nostalgia is, in 2012, no more coherent than anything G.L. Rockwell did before he got greased in front of a laundromat. Don’t throw wrenches at the yahoos wearing swastikas – they’re on the same team, and just as deluded as the Southron ‘General Lee surrendered but I didn’t’ brigade of losers.
Before you jump on me, I’m a Dixie boy in exile yet I accept what I can’t change. The next wave of nationalism – which might do pretty well given how it’s going – will have nothing to do with swastikas or the stars and bars.
And it’s funny as hell that y’all think Dr Paul had any more chance of getting real than Duke, Rockwell, et al … Wake up, gents.
Lew,
Thanks for going to the trouble of making that list. I was too beside myself to do so. I just can’t fathom the idea that 48 years hasn’t taught people a lesson. No doubt that their registered requests for more choices like Wendell Wilkie will keep them from the horrors of the re-election of Barack Obama’s grandson.
How many times per day do you say “Duh?”, Jack? Steinbeck once observed that you can teach a moron to read, but you can’t teach a genius to read between the lines. You either can or you can’t.
I think that is the problem a lot of folks have when it comes to libertarians and their attitude towards borders.
I’ll try once again to make the very obvious as clear as possible to you. Libertarians are against having a large central government. They are for letting the local people decide what is good for them.
That means that the old men who farm and ranch in Oklahoma, Kansas and a bunch of places that don’t have any young folks because they all moved off to go to college and work at office jobs can hire Mexican field hands to help them produce the edible items that we need to survive.
That means that the folks in areas that still have manufacturing jobs that they don’t want to share with Mexicans can run them off.
Before any dumb sonofabitch says, “Yeah, but they’ll get sued in Federal Court!”, use your Bozo brain. The small central government envisioned by libertarians does not include a fucking federal court to micromanage the choices of the masses.
Without an overbearing central government states will be free to rule themselves. They will be free to leave most choices up to counties, that, likewise, can leave choices up to the cities and towns.
Those of you who are old enough to remember and observant enough to notice may recall the way the laws governing machine guns worked in Arizona prior to August of 1968 when the feds decided to run that whole show. The state of Arizona had no law against private possession of machine guns. Some counties ordinances that prohibited possession of machine guns in within that particular jurisdiction. Other counties let the cities decide. Some cities let the people decide.
It went beyond guns and it went beyond Arizona. To this day, Nevada lets the counties decide whether or not to allow prostitution. Some Nevada counties let the cities decide.
Some cities let the people decide.
Back when the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was still a respected part of American governance, much of the country operated as though it was ruled in accordance to a libertarian template. The locals created and enforced the laws that they felt were important. They were free to outlaw guns, hookers and pickled boiled eggs if they wanted to, or they could let people who liked those things to decide for themselves.
A lot of areas were governed without many written laws, but everyone knew what would and would not be tolerated in a given area. The drinking, carousing, whoring and fighting that would be the norm in a Wisconsin logging town wouldn’t fly in a college town only a few miles down river.
That was back when everything was okay until a damn good reason that something wasn’t okay became apparent.
I think freedom scares the living shit out out of your city-slicker ass, Jack. You need to go out west for a while.
J R,
These people aren’t cultists or believers in either of those two ideologies. They’re Republicans. Honest and hard working Soviet citizens who resent any and all infringements on Soviet sovereignty.
Pay no attention to those of us who notify them that their children will be ashamed of them.
Denise, Jack:
Rand’s grade so far from NUSA is only a B Minus. Better than his father but not as good as, e.g. Todd Akin. (hint hint hint)
I watched his RNC speech. I wish he wouldn’t have included that drivel about Cambodian donut makers in Bowling Green. I get the feeling that he had to tone it down in order for the convention to do that video in dedication to his father. I think Rand’s positioning halfway between his father and Rush Limbaugh will pay dividends to getting some libertarian (the good kind of libertarian) legislation passed like serious restrictions on the TSA if not eliminating it, internet freedom, auditing and eventually replacing the Fed, etc., but it’s not making everyone happy. His father’s loyalists aren’t thrilled, and many Jewish neo-cons still hate Rand for who his father is. As late as January, Mark Levin threatened to bash in Rand’s knees because of Ron’s campaign, and Rand was before that a welcome guest on Levin’s show.
Nobody will have to worry about forcing people to stop paying attention to Ron and instead focusing on Rand. As of January 3, Ron is out of elected office.
Jack:
I tried e-mailing you at your gmail address and it bounced back.
PRB:
Well said. A lot of people don’t get that libertarianism isn’t about economics alone. It’s about decentralization, freedom and autonomy. It’s understandable people get confused on this point though given the loudest public voices for libertarianism are the Wall Street Journal and the CATO institute.
Playing Roots Backwards:
I don’t think the paradigm you described is libertarianism, it’s Federalism. A true libertarian would want there to be no laws against prostitution anywhere. We’re okay with the paradigm of a town in Nevada having it and a town in Tennessee not having it, without D.C. saying whether we can or can’t.
Jack Ryan replies:
‘Such ridiculous nonsense! It was recently said there would never again be a White Heavy weight boxing champion, that “White boys can’t fight”. The reality is that White boxers have dominated the heavier boxing divisions forever ten years.’
Very true. The Klitschko brothers are heavyweight champions extraordinaire. Probably the greatest ever, but the boxing moguls and media shysters hate them for decimating all their favorite darkies.
Caste Football’s boxing forum is up to date with all the info. The lighter weight divisions are also overwhelmingly dominated by Whites champs.
Here is a clip of legendary Joe Calzaghe destroying Jeff Lacy who was supposedly going to annihilate Joe. Ha ha.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_Mobffky2w
Joe retired undefeated and his TKO of Roy (Superman) Jones is a thing of beauty. A spectacular boxing exhibition. It can be found on Youtube.
Buy this lottery ticket:
If Obama wins (my prediction) you will be worse off four years from now than you are now.
If Romney wins you will be worse off four years from now than you are now, in further proportion.
If you wish to bet against this and if your wager is big enough* I promise to meet you in Las Vegas in 2016, if I’m still alive.
Criteria will be decided gentlemanly.
* Five figures, at least.
Thanks Sam.
I agree that Joe Calzaghe was one of the greatest White fighters ever. Joe had hand speed as great as Sugar Ray Leonard. I didn’t understand why the American boxing community, media didn’t go for Joe. C, clearly one of the top 5 Italian heritage fighters of all time, much, much better than Jake Lamotta or Rocky Balboa.
Sam,
It doesn’t look like Caste Football blog is up to date. They have so e lame article about women’s basketball and the boxing stories look very dated.
“I just can’t fathom the idea that 48 years hasn’t taught people a lesson.”
You are trying my patience. I despise above all else on this earth dishonest spin masters who resort to fraud in order to boost their case. You know full well what I am speaking of, too.
NOBODY here, and certainly not I, advocated actually and literally wearing a brownshirt or a KKK sheet over their head while political campaigning. You know that, sir. NOBODY here, and certainly not I, told anyone to shout seig heil or throw up a stiff armed Nazi salute or burn a cross on the campaign trail or on a television political ad. You know that, sir. You know that. So why are you lying? Why?
What WAS discussed and pointed out was very specific. You know that, sir. I and other pointed out that the white working class will not and has not ever voted for Libertarians. We listed some specific reasons why this is so. You know that. Yes you do. You just ignored it and now you are spinning my and others comments into something that we did not say or advocate. That is lying.
I DID make the assertion that a Rockwell would most likely do well today. I did not say he should wear a brownshirt and a swastika armband. I did not say he should wear a sheet over his head. I wrote that a pro white message and a man with the guts and will to convey that message would be a winner. That is what I wrote and what my meaning was.
It is YOUR Libertarian position that has been trying the same “let’s abolish the old folks SS and medicare and make them work until the day they die” that should have been modified and discarded “48 years ago.” It is your Libertarian Party outreach and doctrines and campaign slogans and strategy that is invariable and does not change despite repeated rejection at the polls.
But no, you have to spin and lie and imply some of us wrote things that we did not.
Calzaghe defeated Jones Jr. by unanimous decision, not TKO. But he did batter and cut up Jones throughout the entire fight.
Jack,
I think I have it figured out. It’s not that any Ron Paulite screwed you out of money that generated your scorn. Obviously I’m a Cardinals fan, and I think you feel the same way about RP fanatics that I do about Cubs fans. In other words, your “personal” grind against RP fanatics is far more sociological than monetary.
I’ve always been a fan of term limits on politicians, because I don’t think politicians should be worshipped, even ones I agree with, and I don’t want them building up tenure in order to build up a near-divine aura. I have no permanent political friends or enemies, just permanent interests.
Too, we need term limits on legislative bodies because black districts almost always re-elect the incumbent black no matter what, and when Democrats control the legislature, blacks get powerful positions because they have the seniority. Term limits cuts that off at the knees.
Denise et al.:
Just so you know, Rand dropped hints recently that he might not seek a second term in the Senate, because he misses his eye surgery practice. He dropped those hints at a presser in Louisville recently when he gave back the unused portion of his Senate office budget.
To that, good for him. I wouldn’t want there to be a cult around him like there was/is around his father. We have to get the message across that there is no white knight pure savior on a golden unicorn that’s going to swoop down to save us, that we’ll have to save ourselves using temporary politicians as a tool.
Now we have yet another telling us about how great the Libertarians are because they will give us a small government and all of that. Everyone knows and understands that. But there is a reason why the white working class, a great many who would just LOVE , love I say, to be able to grow a twenty acre plot of twenty feet tall marijuana plants, for example, or to visit whores without any chance of legal recrimination, and a hundred other things we all know Libertarians would allow if given the chance, there is a reason why these same people who would just love all of that nevertheless do not vote for Libertarian candidates. I have twice told you now specifically, and Jack’s opening essay lists those same reasons, why this is so. But no, once again this pro white “movement” or whatever you want to call it, totally neglects the primary concern of 3/4 of white people.
So I will write it again, the white working people are not going to vote for people who are going to take away their SS, pension checks, their wages, in short their financial status, no matter how strong the racial message. No matter how small you make the government.
Go out and ask some of them. Go out and ask about one hundred of people getting off work from plants and factories. Tell them you are going to create a small government and free the owners of their factories and plants and construction firms from any type of legislation like they are under right now. Go tell them that. Then ask them what they think.
Brutus, my reference of 48 years was to the 1964 election.
Your over-reaction was what one, once upon a time, would have called “Soviet”. Go back to your TV.
Brutus wrote:
Go out and ask about one hundred of people getting off work from plants and factories.
Unfortunately, I don’t speak Chinese.
Playing Roots Backwards says:
‘That means that the old men who farm and ranch in Oklahoma, Kansas and a bunch of places that don’t have any young folks because they all moved off to go to college and work at office jobs can hire Mexican field hands to help them produce the edible items that we need to survive.’
I have heard that type of argument for decades. Problem is we now have more Mexicans filling our jails, prisons, and welfare rolls than we have field hands. Before long they will own all the farms.
I use to read Harry Brown’s books and bought into some of his stuff years ago when I was learning about money, how to accrue wealth. He wrote of economics, freedom, how to invest and living in Switzerland and so on. Not a damn thing about racial consciousness, brotherhood and solidarity. That to me is the biggest drawback of Libertarianism.
I joined an investment club, and I swear, every pipe smoker was a libertarian. They’d fold their arms and ponder shit forever and a day. Little action, lots of theory and talk. I think they were terrified of losing a dollar or two if they acted too hastily.
countenance: In your case, let’s forget about learning to read between the lines and concentrate on reading comprehension. Libertarians believe in having just enough federal rules to support basic infrastructure and support trade between the states and beyond. It’s about making those who use a service pay for that service. The same goes for roads, railroads and airplanes.
They believe in few federal rules either for or against anything. That means that they wouldn’t support a rule against Whites marrying niggers, nor would they support a rule against running Whites who marry niggers out of town. The same would apply to queers, necrophiliacs, cow screwers and illegal aliens. Everybody would eventually settle in a place that would tolerate them.
Federalism is just another element of the failed ideas of our misguided forefathers who forgot to describe what all of the men who were created equal looked like. Looking backward to the people who created the system that ended us up in our present situation is just plain dumb.
Maybe those of us who are fortunate enough to survive WWIII will be able to eventually settle into a society ruled primarily on the local level through referendum. That would be a lot closer to natural state of the European tribes from which we descended.
Maybe that’s why the much of the white working class is in the working class rather than the middle, professional and upper classes. For good or ill, many of them are simply too dumb to obtain advanced degrees or accumulate wealth on their own, so they have to rely on government handouts. It goes without saying these <100 IQ whites are not going grasp the benefits of a libertarian system.
Jack, you’re always ripping Ron Paul apart. I understand you believe most of the BS thrown at us by the establishment. You state some things about Paul that are simply not true. He is a decent man who loves this country. I do not agree with him on all issues but I get it. I get the message. I understand that for us to truly achieve what we want to achieve, we need freedom. We need the government out of our lives.
Anyone who votes for Romney, in the belief that he will lead this country in a different direction, is an outright fool. More jobs will be lost, the economy will not improve, Obamacare will not be overturned, we will continue to be dispossessed, more immigrants-legal and illegal, more war, etc. Should he win, perhaps the next 4 years will bring you to the point I am now at.
Snowhitey:
I keep hearing about ObamaCare, and repealing it. People keep assuming that a Romney Presidency, a Republican-run Senate and a Republican-run House in 2013 would repeal it slam dunk.
I’m not so sure.
One of the things that has been masked here in the Era of Dope and Chains is the massive rift between RINOs and conservatives among Senate Republicans. If Republicans run everything next year, those divisions will come back to the surface. I predict that any serious effort to repeal ObamaCare will get stabbed in the back in the Senate by Collins, Snowe, Grahamnesty, McCain, Scott Brown.
The “best” I think would happen is that the individual mandate will be repealed, nothing more.
Beg thee, thy highness George III, that we be re-admitted to thy royal domain, that royals minister and serfs toil. Amen.
Lew:
Sub-100 IQ whites can and do vote. They can and do deserve the opportunity to have a decent career and the concept of affordable family creation, even if they’ll never be rich.
“Your over-reaction was what one, once upon a time, would have called “Soviet”. Go back to your TV.”
This guy is a typical Internet poster who after he makes stupid arguments and points lies and spins what people write in order to back pedal and weasel out of a predicament. They never address anything, just weasel out.
And what the hell are you talking about with the “Soviet” thing? What country are you from, anyway? Whatever anyone in this country would have to say about my post and reaction, it would NOT be called “Soviet.” Seriously, what country are you from?
“They believe in few federal rules either for or against anything. That means that they wouldn’t support a rule against Whites marrying niggers, nor would they support a rule against running Whites who marry niggers out of town. The same would apply to queers, necrophiliacs, cow screwers and illegal aliens. Everybody would eventually settle in a place that would tolerate them.”
Well, Democrats and Republicans have brought us to the point where most of this immoral decadence is now legal or tolerated yet you only attack Libertarians? I don’t believe Libertarians would allow most of the rubbish you state? I’ve never heard any one of them have this nonsense as part of their platform. You’re making conclusions.
Ron Paul specifically stated he believed that marriage was a union between a man and a woman.
Snowhitey, you said it for me as well.
Jack Ryan wrote: “Sept. 11 th is not the day to try to lecture White Americans that we need to understand the Arab Muslim’s just opposition with American foreign policies….”
Mosin replies: To the contrary, it is the best possible day for Ron
Paul or anyone to speak the truth on those unjust wars.
Jack, you have your Neocon now. Vote for him.
If the individual mandate is repealed then the numbers don’t add up enough to finance the rest of it. It’s pretty much repeal almost all of it or nothing. The Republicans are not going to get to 60 votes in the Senate so it is unlikely to get repealed. If the Republicans have a majority in the Senate of less than 60 they could invoke the “nuclear option” and get rid of the 60 vote cloture rule on filibustering and then repeal Obamacare with a simple majority vote but I don’t think that they could get enough votes among Republicans to repeal cloture.
Rudel:
The plan is to repeal ObamaCare as a budget bill, so that it can’t be filibustered.
Your recommended improvement on Ron Paul — Junior (Rand) — is a distraction, an antidote.
“much, much better than Jake Lamotta or Rocky Balboa.”
Surely you mean Rocky Marciano.
Mosin Nagant writes:
Jack Ryan wrote: “Sept. 11 th is not the day to try to lecture White Americans that we need to understand the Arab Muslim’s just opposition with American foreign policies….”
Mosin replies: To the contrary, it is the best possible day for Ron
Paul or anyone to speak the truth on those unjust wars.”
Jack Ryan replies:
Uhhhhhm, OK.
If you are feeling brave, or really, really stupid go argue this position in some Irish American bar in Queens New York City, talk with some Irish American NYFD, or the widows and orphans of those brave Irish American NYFD martyred on 9-11-01.
I will come to your funeral and try to explain/excuse the insane race denying cult of Libertarianism.
Rudel, the people have spoken already, in their choice of candidates. (Even some regulars on this blog are included.) Jack Ryan is right about this: The vast majority continues voting for leaders who will continue giving them their “something for nothings” including health care subsidies.
“Maybe that’s why the much of the white working class is in the working class rather than the middle, professional and upper classes. For good or ill, many of them are simply too dumb to obtain advanced degrees or accumulate wealth on their own, so they have to rely on government handouts. It goes without saying these <100 IQ whites are not going grasp the benefits of a libertarian system."
Yes, you are correct. A large number of white people have IQ's of less than 100. Yes, the waiter down at the restaurant and the guy who cleans the turd stains out of the toilette over at the school or the foundry could not understand or learn how to calculate a quintic equation. Some of these white people live off of welfare, that is so. A lot of them, however, have worked 30, 35, 40 ,45 years even in plants, factories and other jobs. They have a good work ethic and are not listless or lazy. They are not capable of navigating the stock market. They have their pay checks and whatever benefits their employers gave them to live on. Many of them already more or less worked under employers such as you promote. They made the equivalent of about seven bucks an hour all of their lives and no benefits. They live in trailers and drive 15 year old vehicles. They are retired now and their bodies are too wore out and their eyes and everything are bad so they can no longer work now that they are 70. They only have SS.
They are not going to be the chief engineer of General Electric, Lew. Just between me and you, should we gas these or poison them, or just starve them to death? Hell, the old man down the road from me can't speak latin or discuss fluid dynamics with me. Sum bitch can't see. He was so dumb that in over 45 years of working he couldn't make plant manager or even make up to 15 bucks an hour. Damn fool bought a car and his food instead of health insurance. Never missed a single day of work, but who gives a rat's ass, right, Lew? Come on down and let's you and me tell that old you-know-what that he is now a leach. What do you say? Hell, Hunter here has the ass to talk good about slavery; plenty of people on these sites don't have a qualm about telling what ought to be done to the Jews; we all know what to do with the blacks and aren't afraid to co,me right out and say it. So let's not falter now, Lew, we got these dang white misfits of less than 100 IQs to deal with. What are we going to do with those? And just like everything else we discuss, let's not BS about much. Wink, wink, we all know that in most cases the family and kids aren't going to take them in and care for them. They are not going to be financially burdened. What are we going to do with this problem, Lew? Gas or the black bottle? Or have got some other way in mind to get rid of them?
Don't be shy, let's hear it.