The Economist: Globalists Must Unite Behind Hillary

July 28, 2016 Hunter Wallace Politics 35

The Economist bids farewell to Left and Right:

“AS POLITICAL theatre, America’s party conventions have no parallel. Activists from right and left converge to choose their nominees and celebrate conservatism (Republicans) and progressivism (Democrats). But this year was different, and not just because Hillary Clinton became the first woman to be nominated for president by a major party. The conventions highlighted a new political faultline: not between left and right, but between open and closed (see article). Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, summed up one side of this divide with his usual pithiness. “Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo,” he declared. His anti-trade tirades were echoed by the Bernie Sanders wing of the Democratic Party.

America is not alone. Across Europe, the politicians with momentum are those who argue that the world is a nasty, threatening place, and that wise nations should build walls to keep it out. Such arguments have helped elect an ultranationalist government in Hungary and a Polish one that offers a Trumpian mix of xenophobia and disregard for constitutional norms. Populist, authoritarian European parties of the right or left now enjoy nearly twice as much support as they did in 2000, and are in government or in a ruling coalition in nine countries. So far, Britain’s decision to leave the European Union has been the anti-globalists’ biggest prize: the vote in June to abandon the world’s most successful free-trade club was won by cynically pandering to voters’ insular instincts, splitting mainstream parties down the middle.

News that strengthens the anti-globalisers’ appeal comes almost daily. On July 26th two men claiming allegiance to Islamic State slit the throat of an 85-year-old Catholic priest in a church near Rouen. It was the latest in a string of terrorist atrocities in France and Germany. The danger is that a rising sense of insecurity will lead to more electoral victories for closed-world types. This is the gravest risk to the free world since communism. Nothing matters more than countering it. …

Republicans who are serious about resisting the anti-globalists should hold their noses and support Mrs Clinton. And Mrs Clinton herself, now that she has won the nomination, must champion openness clearly, rather than equivocating. Her choice of Tim Kaine, a Spanish-speaking globalist, as her running-mate is a good sign. But the polls are worryingly close. The future of the liberal world order depends on whether she succeeds.”

I agree with this assessment: Hillary-Kaine is the globalist ticket.

This election boils down to nationalism versus globalism: on one side, you have people who are for open borders, free-trade, and endless wars in remote areas of the world, and those people are voting for Hillary to preserve the neo-liberal world order under which a tiny oligarchy – basically, the Davos crowd – lords it over everyone else from their posh zip codes while virtue signaling their cosmopolitanism.

On the opposite side, you have people who are against open borders, free-trade, and endless wars in remote areas of the world who have seen their communities ravaged by mass immigration and globalization, whose children end up fighting in the endless wars, and who are afraid of the terrorists who have been settled next door and who have been the losers under the status quo. They are voting for Trump.

The globalists include Angela Merkel, Theresa May, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Jeb Bush, François Hollande, etc. Some of them claim to be “conservatives.” Some of them claim to “liberals” or “progressives.” Regardless of who wins, they always deliver the same globalist policies on trade, immigration, and foreign policy. When it comes to these three issues, Hillary Clinton and Marco Rubio are on the same side.

Globalists may disagree among themselves on issues like abortion or gun control, but what matters most to them is preserving the neo-liberal world order and “America’s leadership role” in maintaining the present system.

About Hunter Wallace 12392 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

35 Comments

  1. That cartoon is ultra-triggering: life on our side of the wall is going to be as good as life can get.

    The binary fissure is reminiscent of the ancient Aryan concept of Arta and Druj: Truth and Falsehood / Order and Chaos / Good and Evil. Ragnarok approaches.

    Just as the question of why Communism needed a wall to keep people in if it was such a workers paradise delegitimized the system, our question of why people would want a wall if globalism was so wonderful will delegitimize Communism-through-the-back door, aka Globalism.

  2. I agree too even though it’s not a masterpiece or anything we don’t know already. More insecurity, more populism and raise of right wing parties, thanks for figuring this out for us…Europe is not the only one concerned by terror: both San Bernardino and Orlando gained DjTrump more support and votes. Another mass attack in the US (ie from islamists) and the deal is sealed for making America great again.

  4. “Republicans who are serious about resisting the anti-globalists should hold their noses and support Mrs Clinton.”

    Hahahahahahahaha! Hold their noses? They’d need full body suits, for the STENCH OF THE WHORE OF BABYLON ON THE HUDSON!!

    And as for the RNC, why Resist it? Join the ‘dark Side’ and see the LIGHT!

    “From Father West: “Voting for Donald? Trump is not doing evil in order to achieve a good end. Voting for him is not endorsement of everything he has said or done. Your vote is an exercise of power. If you exercise that power to limit evil you are doing something good. You are not doing something evil in order to achieve a good end. In Catholic moral theology a moral act must be evaluated according to the act itself, the intention and the circumstances. All three have to be either good or neutral. The act of voting is in itself good. If your intention is to limit evil, your intentions are good. The circumstances in this election is that a vote for Trump is the only way to stop the election of a corrupt, dishonest, pro-abortion, anti-family, extremely careless criminal. Voting for Donald Trump is therefore a good moral act because it limits evil insofar as it is possible at the moment.”
    – http://restore-dc-catholicism.blogspot.com/2016/07/applying-catholic-moral-theology-to.html

  6. “This election boils down to nationalism versus globalism”

    It’s a war of ZOG against White people. The Jews behave as a block in support of ZOG. ZOG’s goal is the genocide of White people. On the other side, White people have no idea the war is led by Jews. Actually, they don’t know the government and the media are at war against them. Lately, more people are waking up, but it’s taking them forever. White Nationalists are still a minority. Deep down, most people do not disagree with us, but they lack the intellectual clarity. That is because of the censorship in politics and the media. They have just woken up enough to vote for Trump next November.

    Trump won’t even say that he wants to defend White people. The Jews won’t say they want to destroy us either, but they don’t need to say it publicly. Unlike most White people, the Jews know they are at war against us. It’s part of their religion, which is more a racial thing than a religion.

    About 25 years ago, I bought an special issue of The Economist about Australia. Those great experts said that Australia’s greatest asset was that is was still an almost entirely White country, which meant it was ready to import millions of non-Whites. They are no economists, they are Jewish frauds!

    The “Economist”: “The conventions highlighted a new political faultline: not between left and right, but between open and closed”

    It isn’t a new faultline at all. The left/right divide has long been a jewish scam. There was a huge chasm, in both political parties, between the Euro-American grassroots and the pro-Jewish managers. There’s is the same chasm between the Jews who own the newspapers, and their White readers. There’s a huge chasm between the genociders and the genocidees, between the majority of the country, which is against race replacement, and the Jewish-led government and media, which want to destroy the White race.

    What’s new is that Trump, thanks to his fortune, his celebrity and his talent, has short-circuited the Jews. He didn’t denounce the left/right divide as a Jewish scam, but he is appealing to White workers. By the way, when you are White Nationalists, you shouldn’t call yourself “new right” or “alt right”, you should try to appeal to all White people.

    As I say, what’s new in the USA is Trump. But in Western Europe, the Jews are still very much in power, and speeding up the race replacement process. I hope Donald and Vladimir will think up some way to get rid of Merkel, May and Hollande.

    The “Economist”: “the anti-globalists”

    Usually, they would say the “antisemites”, but they would only be talking about the nationalists. They don’t mind evoking the hostility between innocent jews and evil “antisemites”. But when they are talking about the mass of White people who are about to vote for Trump, it’s embarrassing to call them all “antisemites”. They would rather call them “antiglobalists”, so people won’t realize it is really a “war” between the Jews and their European victims.

  7. She looks like the Colonel Sanders to me!

    A fried chicken in every bucket!

  8. Clinton’s speech so far is insipid and consists mostly of empty platitudes. Last week the pundits of the mainstream media lambasted Trump’s speech for lacking any policy details. Compared to Clinton’s speech so far it was chock full of details. Yet I anticipate the pundits will laud her for a magnificent performance and tell us how she has now taken back the momentum and put Trump on the defensive. They are so full of BS.

      • I really enjoyed hearing her cackle after mentioning how she believes in science. If this is the best she can do I really think she is in trouble. Perhaps they will need to resort to cheating. Trump needs to watch out for this.

          • I’ll give her credit for some witty jabs against Trump, but she has failed to give anyone an actual reason to voter for her other than those who vote only for progressive social causes.

          • On a more serious note she’s saying Trump is thin skinned and easy to provoke.

            The problem is that she’s in a controlled bubble at all times.

            When has she had a press conference? When was the last public access she gave?

            Trump soaks up pressure like a sponge. He flattened a dozen superior financed big name opponents with little more than his wits.

          • Excellent point. I was thinking the same thing. It is easy to not be provoked by questions from reporters when you don’t speak with them. Trump excels at interacting with the media.

    • Her voice is like unto nails on a chalkboard to me. Like Samuel Jackson she cannot engage in discourse without yelling.

  12. “This election boils down to nationalism versus globalism”

    Yes, Jihad versus McWorld. We were talking about this almost 25 years ago. The word is getting out.

    What the Communist threat was to our fathers and grandfathers, Globalism is to us.

    Globalism = Communism

    #nationalist4lyfe

    • “Jihad versus McWorld”

      Or Jihad versus Jewhad.
      Except it’s the Jewhadists who are importing the Jihadists into Western countries.

      • The author of the book Jihad vs. McWorld is a Jew. Jewishness is at the center of his career. But he would rather remain incognito. His wikipedia entry doesn’t even mention the word jew.

  13. The “Economist”: “Republicans who are serious about resisting the anti-globalists should hold their noses and support Mrs Clinton”

    If, like the neocons at The “Economist”, you are a principled conservative who believes in the constitution, it’s important to vote for the crook Clinton and for race-replacement… What a bunch of neo-crooks!

    Headline: “The Economist: Globalists Must Unite Behind Hillary”

    The Blacks and the third-world invaders who will be voting for Hillary are not even “globalists”. They just want more money from White people. And they like the idea of voting against White people. But they do not believe in a more open world. They couldn’t care less what is happening in the wider world.

    As for the Jews at the “Economist”, I wouldn’t say they have open, noble and generous minds. Their obsession is to destroy White people. You would expect them to love us, since they depend on us for their comfortable lifestyle. I’m sure most fleas like the dog whose back they live on. But for some reason, the Jewish vampires don’t like us.

    • There are some places, in Western countries, that are now entirely peopled by non-Whites and have become very dangerous for White people to venture into. They are no-go areas.

      No-go areas vote for the Democrats. It’s funny to say that you can no longer go into those places because they are now full of Democrats and much too dangerous.

      But instead of calling the Blacks “Democrats”, you could just as well call them “globalists”. By the way, it’s terrifying to see the Democrat on Republican crime stats.

    • Globalism is their religion with synchronization through elitist clubs/organizations and various secret societies. That is where their allegiances lie. With each other and the main mission. Not with race or ethnicity or nationality or faith. Disinformation is our reality not theirs.

      It only took one sentence by Defense Secretary James Forrestal for Senator Joe McCarthy to realize that the real enemy wasn’t even communism. All that time wasted. And, once he knew the truth, it was only then that they destroyed him….. and Forrestal. Joe would have lived longer if he hadn’t followed the breadcrumbs. Or, had lunch with Forrestal.

      White people are the prime target but everyone, who’s not in the club, is the target. The Jewish vampires aren’t alone. And, neither are white people.

  14. I don’t know if I will ever watch television news again if she becomes President. Her voice makes me feel physically ill. Literally I think she could induce suicide just from that awful shrill tone!

  15. You can tell the Democratic Party and Clinton Foundation is all about Globalist. Just look at the stage. All the speakers stood right in the middle of a circle of stars. I’m sure symbolic of World Government! Deo Vindice !

Comments are closed.