There is more good news on the periphery of Western Europe.
Corsica – the birth place of Napoleon Bonaparte is now leading the fight against the worst Islamists!
“Ajaccio (France) (AFP) – Corsican lawmakers on Thursday called on the French state to close down radical mosques on the Mediterranean island, hours after an underground separatist movement issued a threat against Islamic extremists.
The regional parliament adopted a resolution urging Paris to ensure the immediate closure in Corsica “of prayer or meeting places that act as centers of radicalization or where hateful speeches are made, creating an atmosphere that is favorable to violence”.
The resolution was adopted with a landslide, with MPs from the nationalist, left and right parties voting for, and only three Communists abstaining….. The resolution was passed after a splinter group of the nationalist Corsican National Liberation Front (FLNC) in a statement warned Islamists that any attack on the island would trigger “a determined response, without any qualms”.”
“The Great Man theory is a 19th-century idea according to which history can be largely explained by the impact of “great men”, or heroes; highly influential individuals who, due to either their personal charisma, intelligence, wisdom, or political skill utilized their power in a way that had a decisive historical impact.” (Source)
Wilmot Robertson’s classic “The Dispossessed Majority” argues that “the West” with strong racial/cultural foundations has a history of great strong men coming in from the provinces/colonies to restore order, save the civilization. These great strong men have cultural/racial loyalties to the center/capital of the civilization, but they are tougher are more willing to use force/violence than traditional upper class, royalty, gentry etc. The best examples of these great strong men from the provinces are:
Alexander the Great – from Macedonia who saves classical Greek Hellenic civilization then exports it through conquest.
Napoleon Bonoparte – from Corsica who saves French civilization, fires in to the Parisian mobs to end the French Revolution reign of terror.
Hitler – from Austria, a lower level, tough guy from the Ost reich who defeats Communism, financial criminal anarchy in Germany.
Stalin – from Georgia. It’s not a clear White savior, but most Russian nationalist think he restored White Slavic rule over Trotsky, Jewish Bolshevik anarchy.
Putin – KGB officer in East Germany – sees the fall of Soviet Empire in the furtherest part West, goes back to Russia to end Jewish Oligarch anarchy restore Russian nationalist rule, put down Mountain Muslim terrorism in the Caucuses.
In the USA, we really haven’t had a great man, strong man savior yet – closest is Andy Jackson the Indian fighter, opposed the Banks.
But now we have….
Donald Trump!
Unlike many French and other eurowussies.. Corsicans have a history of resisting invaders and that include the Werhmacht.
A tough crowd and they have a right to be proud of their heritage. There are still white people with balls in the West. They are one of them.
https://youtu.be/0taenIB_RHA
The Power that owns the Left is truly awesome power.
Most of opposition politics have come from the Left.
Leftists are naturally restless, confrontational, agitated, and abrasive. They like to bitch, thrown tantrums, and be defiant. Even in a perfect world, the leftist mindset would find something to complain about. The problem is more internal than external. The leftist mindset loves to fuss about how something is wrong and how others must be blamed. Consider Betty Friedan. She had a nice middle class life, but she compared it to the Holocaust. Leftists blame the world, but the real agitation is within their hearts. It’s like what Mao said in Stone’s movie: “The real war is in us. History is a symptom of our disease.”
https://youtu.be/VP1hPPFBht0?t=2m36s
Rightists can be violent and disruptive, but it’s not in their nature. When things seem normal and stable, most rightists just stay home and tend the garden. They don’t enjoy marching in streets, tossing molotov cocktails, holding up signs, and dreaming of utopia. They may dream of personal kingdom of God, but they accept the world as it is UNLESS things are really bad. Then, even the rightists take to the streets, as happened in interwar Europe, current Europe(due to massive migration), and in the US(where support for Trump shows there is growing anxiety among conservatives).
Because rightists tend to be calmer and allergic to agitation and trouble-making, the power need not fear them too much. A rightist is like Norman Fell in THE GRADUATE who tells Benjamin Braddock that he won’t have any agitation.
The Power fears the Left because it is agitated, hysterical, excited, angry, bitter, violent, aggressive, righteous, utopian, deranged. (The Power also fears blacks because they is just crazy and riot and loot for the hell of it.) The Power, when it was Waspy, used to fear restless and relentless Jews. But now the Power is held by Jews.
When Wasps held the Power, the leftist Jewish opposition was feverish and driven.
Today, when Jews hold the Power, it is the Power that is most feverish and driven.
The Power doesn’t have to worry too much about the Right. Right tends to be either timid, reserved, restrained, orderly, stoic, and too normal for much trouble-making.
Even when Rightists are pissed, they usually stay home and gripe alone.
But the Left is much more likely to hit the streets. Also, the left is much more likely to be engaged with arts, media, and academia and shape public opinion and inspire young to make trouble. The Right tends to be philistine and anti-intellectual.
So, the Power has much to fear from the Left.
It would be a great boon to the Power to win over the Left and have it on its side. If the Left feels that its side is in power, it is less likely to go nuts. And the Power had less to worry about since the Left now supports the Power.
Of course, this causes a problem. The Power is never about equality. The PTB–powers that be–are always gonna be richer, more privilege, and more powerful than the rest. Leftism is anti-hierarchy, so it isn’t easy to square the Left with the Power, especially capitalist power that leads to the creation of oligarchy and super-wealth(and imperialist expansion).
The classic left bitches about the 1% vs the 99%.
The Power tries to make the 1% even richer and more powerful.
The 1% has much to fear from the Left.
After WWII, the 1% didn’t have to fear the Left too much. Anti-communism made Americans suspicious of radicalism and Soviet Union and Red China.
Also, the post-war boom led to rise of vast middle class. It wasn’t a time of 1% vs 99% but a time when the vast middle had it pretty good. There was more wealth distribution throughout the economy. US labor was strong. US was leader in manufacturing, and even highschool graduates could have decent jobs and raise a family in a world where family values still mattered.
But US entered into the globalist era. With massive outsourcing of working class jobs and massive insourcing of immigrants in service and high-tech jobs, many Americans are feeling the squeeze in the middle and below.
The 1% is richer than ever. It is also more Jewish than ever.
Jewish leftists loved to attack the Wasp Power. But Jewish progs today don’t want to be too hard on the Power since it’s held by their tribal brethren who, btw, shower them with money and favors.
But, given the increasing rift between the rich and everyone else, there should be more reason than ever for the Left to speak, indeed shout, truth to the Power.
But the ‘left’ is now more supportive of power than ever before. Why? There was some leftist fury during the Bush era, especially with the Iraq War that turned into quagmire.
But during the Clinton and Obama era, there was mostly silence.
Clinton forged a new alliance between 1% free trade globalism and the Left. Via Clintonism, those who were on the Left could find promising careers funded by the rich, especially in NGO’s. Also, it was the boomer Libs who became the richest people in the 80s and 90s.
Also, in a nation that worships Diversity and Holocaust, the fact that there are so many rich Jews made it rather taboo to be overly critical of the rich. After all, it might be ‘antisemitic’. Also, celebrity culture features so many rich black rappers, homo fashion designers, liberal Hollywood stars, the likes of Oprah, and etc. Their fans love the fact that their ‘heroes’ and idols are so rich. So, rich was made ‘cool’. Much of ‘leftism’ today is swooning over the fact that Jay-Z and Taylor Swift are worth gazillions. I mean who complains if their sports hero signs a $100 million contract? Who bitched about Tiger Woods raking in millions with all those endorsements? And who said anything about Clinton making $100 million from speeches?
Also, the Prog-globalists changed leftism increasingly from economic to cultural, demographic, and lifestyle issues. It had less and less to do with class and economics. It had more to do with celebrating homomania. The celebration of rich homos doesn’t hurt the rich at all, especially when so many homos cater to the vain rich. It is celebration of the fact that Tim Cook wants a dick up his bunghole.
It had more to do with style. So, celebrating black athletes and rappers became part of ‘leftism’. Slut culture and porny behavior became ‘leftist’.
With so many young people distracted with hedonism and self-indulgence as their main political agenda, they were never going to pose a threat to the Power. No wonder Hillary invited Lena Dunham to give a speech at DNC. What rich person of The Power would fear such a creature whose idea of ‘progress’ is getting tattoos, hooking up, and acting like a materialistic pig?
And of course massive immigration. Immigrants can be a tax burden on the rich. But they also provide cheap labor. And serve as buffer between the urban gentry and criminal blacks. Also, as many immigrants happen to be Mexican or Asian, they tend to be docile with Asiatic genes. Mexicans are mostly happy to pick lettuce and say ‘Si, senor’ and yellow folks are mostly dogs and drones who serve their new master. Even as most yellows are now proggy, they merely follow the ‘leftism’ as devised and dictated by the Power. If the Power says ‘leftism’ is about homo-rainbows, that is what yelloids go with. They have zero originality and zero intellectual agency.
So, with the Power in control of the ‘left'(as lifestyle and vanity), there is no challenge to their status and privilege. Hillary, the darling of Wall Street and War Machine, is seen as the ‘leftist’ candidate. (Merkel is supposed to be ‘conservative’ but shmoozes with Hillary and her ilk. Go figure.)
There was some challenge from Bernie Sanders voters, but Sanders gave up real socialism long ago. He is a phony who appeals to upper-middle-class kids who want free college tuitions. His supporters are trust-fund kids, not working class folks and their kids.
As for the challenge from Trump supporters, maybe it will lead to something in the long run. But the Right isn’t good at the culture of dissent, opposition, trouble-making, and etc. The Right is, by nature, used to favoring order, harmony, conformity, and unity. They don’t thrive in the role of opposition and rebellion.
But things may get so bad that the Right may become the new kind of left.
Indeed, the trick of fascism was it was a rightist movement that took the style and energy from the leftist model.
————–
Well said!
The fix is in and the political class is rallying behind Clinton.
Other than a few talking heads the media is conspiring to portray the Trump campaign as a sinking ship. They parse his every utterance to generate the latest Trump controversy or outrage. Meanwhile they downplay and ignore the outright lies that Clinton tells and the almost daily terrorist attacks taking place in the West. The media is now the mouthpiece of the establishment and echoes its talking points.
The establishment Republicans continue to undermine and sabotage Trump’s campaign. Their politicians send signals about whether they support him and the media continues to give an undue voice to the never Trump spokesmen. Further, the Libertarian party has now positioned itself to become another vehicle to attack the Trump campaign and siphon off Republican votes while aiding Clinton.
The courts are invalidating all attempts at the State level to prevent fraud by requiring an ID to vote. The corruption of all of the nation’s institutions is now complete. This may be the last election in America that matters.
I saw this coming Glacier in Ohio in 2005 when the Cuckservative Republicans phased in Early Voting to prevent Federal Civil Rights charges being brought against the state for the 2004 Election SUPPOSED issues. The Democrats were threatening to put Ohio with the Southern States under the Voting Rights Pre-Clearance, nevermind the fact that the Secretary of State who CERTIFIED the 2004 Election was a Negro.
Every election since has been a farce. Ohio has no residency requirements, you could show up and vote tomorrow on something called a PROVISIONAL BALLOT which means you cant prove you live here but vote anyway. You have a month to vote as well. Before 2005 there were two ways to vote IN PERSON or ABSENTEE.
Since John Cuckservative Kasich became Governor, his Attorney General former Senator Mike DeWine has tried for years to roll back the 2005 changes and institute strict registration procedures but the Federal Courts issue a mass of injunctions. Right now if you know anything about whats going on in Ohio its downright scary. The people no longer control the polls, the Federal Courts do
Had the 2004 laws been in effect until this very day, Obama might have squeaked out a win against McCain but he would have lost by 10 points to Romney who was sunk by a bunch of Cleveland/Columbus/Cincinnati Negro voting fraud
Everything you say sounds right, glacierstorm.
Certainly, I don’t follow or grasp electoral politics the way just about everyone else here does, but I have a question–to anyone:
Nehlen is running against Ryan in an upcoming primary in their state, right? If Nehlen wins the primary, then Ryan is out, completely out, as a force with which Trump must contend in what remains of the presidential campaign–is that right? What are the chances that a Nehlen win in the primary would enable Trump to recover his footing?
If Ryan becomes Cantor’d (an expression named after (((Eric Cantor))), House Majority Leader and cuckservative darling, who was ousted in his primary back in 2014) it would be another nail in the coffin of the cuck globalists seeking to enslave and ruin white homelands. Trump would get a huge boost and other voters would become emboldened; people love success and are repulsed by failure naturally.
Crucially, McCain must also go, it’ll give the “new leaders/fresh blood” narrative strength and Trump fits that paradigm handily. He’s the outsider’s outsider.
I hope David Duke also wins a senate seat, I think my head would explode.
Thanks for the reply, chrysostomos. Very clear.
As you’ll see in the comments I’ve posted at the next Occidental Dissent post (August 5), about the #NeverTrump loss in Tennessee, I’ve given up on Trump. Well, maybe Nehlen will win, and things will be turned around, rather as you say.
>>”They parse his every utterance to generate the latest Trump controversy”
***************************************
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Yes they are against him, such as when the cops are out to get you, you shut up and LISTEN to your attorney to keep your mouth shut and stay on a carefully prepared script because everything you say can and will be spun against you. Had Trump been open borders, globalist the media would love him and spin the coverage in a positive way, but basically he ran the ire of the jews by rallying white guys against all the internationalism projects that are held dear by the mainstream jewish community and threatening to reverse their gains. This means every thing he says can and will be used against him in the press and if he isn’t willing to spend billions to put his own carefully crafted message on TV he’s not going to win period. He might have succeeded for the last 70 years on his own, but like in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid now he’s got the Pinkertons after him and he’s no match by himself anymore.
Very interesting. The time for action is approaching.
I wonder if the “strong man from the colonies” would include European-Americans returning to Europe to fight in the coming civil wars?
European Volunteer Guard (EVG)
Sort of but not really unless it s a strong man at the top.
Some white Cuban or Chilean woukd be good for the USA
Corsicans are now physically fighting in Corsica with very pushy Muslim mobs.
The issue was Islamists wearing burkinis at Corsican resort beaches. This is clearly cultural aggression targeting the main Corsican tourist business. It’s gang clothing.
Good to see that there are just a few tough White European groups who can get in the street and not run away from a Muslim riot.
Here’s the link:
Third French burqini ban after Corsica clashes
Henri Mariani,AFP 12 hours ago Comments Like Reblog on Tumblr Share Tweet Email
Bastia (France) (AFP) – A mayor on the French island of Corsica on Monday became the third nationwide to announce a ban on burqinis, after the full-body Islamic swimsuit allegedly sparked violent clashes.
The Riviera resorts of Cannes and Villeneuve-Loubet have also banned the garment from their beaches in recent weeks, at a highly sensitive time for relations with France’s Muslim community following a series of jihadist attacks.
The new ban in the Corsican village of Sisco comes after a massive brawl on Saturday between locals and families of North African origin.
It is not entirely clear how the fight broke out, but one witness said it happened after tourists took pictures of women swimming in burqinis on the Mediterranean island.
Five people were injured and three cars were burned as the rival sides hurled stones and bottles. A hundred police officers were mobilised to break up the fight.
Prosecutors in nearby Bastia said an inquiry had been opened to determine how the clashes broke out.
Sisco mayor Pierre-Ange Vivoni said burqinis would be banned in the area from Tuesday.
The burqini issue has sparked huge controversy in France, with opponents saying the garment goes against French secular principles, but anti-racism campaigners saying that banning women from wearing it amounts to discrimination.
Islamic dress has long been a hot-button issue in France, where the full-face veil is banned in public places.
The row comes as tensions run high following several attacks in France claimed by the Islamic State group, including last month’s Nice massacre when a Tunisian ploughed a truck into crowds celebrating Bastille Day, killing 85 people.
– Festival cancelled –
France has been under a state of emergency since IS members killed 130 people in Paris in November.
In Corsica, there were tense scenes Sunday as around 500 people gathered in the town of Bastia, seeking to enter the Lupino district which is home to a large North African community.
“We’re going up there because this is our home,” they shouted. Police blocked them from entering.
A local festival planned for August 15 has been cancelled, Vivoni said, but he told AFP this was “not for security reasons but because residents are not in the mood”.
A series of incidents in Corsica have raised tensions between local Muslims and their neighbours.
In December, protesters vandalised a Muslim prayer hall and trashed copies of the Koran after an assault on firefighters that was blamed on youths of Arab origin.
Last month Corsican lawmakers called on the French state to close down radical mosques on the island, after an underground separatist movement issued a threat against Islamic extremists.
A splinter group of the nationalist Corsican National Liberation Front (FLNC) warned Islamists that any attack on the island would trigger “a determined response, without any qualms”.
The burqini ban in Cannes won court backing on Saturday, with a judge ruling that it goes against secularism, a founding principle of the French republic.
In the nearby Riviera resort of Villeneuve-Loubet, mayor Lionnel Luca has justified the ban by saying it is unhygienic to swim fully-dressed.