Thank you, Charlie Kirk.
I finally grasp the stupidity of identity politics.
The U.N. just added Iran as a member of the Women’s Rights Committee
Women in Iran are:
Barred from showing their faces
Lashed for advocating for equal rights
Executed for being lesbian
Not allowed to speak to men other than their father or husband
Why do we fund the U.N.?
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) March 22, 2019
Facts:
Female unemployment lowest in 65 years
Trump’s SBA lent $500 million more to women-owned businesses in 2017 than Obama did in 2016
Trump launched the Women’s Entrepreneurs Finance Initiative to promote female entrepreneurs
Women are thriving under Trump Presidency!
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) March 8, 2019
Today is #InternationalWomensDay
Still waiting for American “feminists” to protest against the oppression of women in Middle Eastern countries, where women cannot drive, vote, own property, run for office, or speak freely
They stay strangely silent in the face of this horror
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) March 8, 2019
I sometimes wish Andrew Anglin would find a gf and be allowed to settle down in Ohio.
I agree with his social critique of the collapse of marriage, the family and Christianity under late liberal capitalist democracy which has given us feminism and MGTOW mass shooters both of which are social plagues that ought to be eradicated. It’s too bad we don’t have a common Christian culture anymore.
Note: We have political correctness and identity politics which is such a better operating system for Western civilization. Try not to laugh.
I think Charlie needs to sort out his confusion between Iran and Saudi Arabia. I agree about the UN, though.
Ditto on wishing Anglin a happy life with a good woman. Probably has to go Asian white women are too ruined. Europe is even worse I think but good women do exist. About as rare as a black engineer but they do exist.
Another non-sensical post. What does yang have to do with kirk and anglin? What point are you making here?
Just have some patience, all right?
Hunter, I say this in a spirit of love and as an LCMS member who’s heading out the door to a Church history study before service, but the Luther thing is getting a little weird
I’m sure it seems that way.
I want you to think about Luther’s accomplishment, tactics and the HISTORY of the Reformation. This is what I have done. It has occurred to me that memes, talking points, the internet, social media networks and so forth are not unlike Luther’s message of reform which was spread through pamphlets and cartoons on woodcuts by Lucas Cranach and Albrecht Durer.
Luther was a reformer who was made famous by the printing press. Now, if you wanted to, say, reform our society in the 21st century wouldn’t you use similar online tools?
Read and think about it
https://www.amazon.com/Brand-Luther-Unheralded-Europe-Reformation/dp/0399563237