Today’s Cancellations

The Thompson Elk Statue:

For representing white supremacy and systemic racism.

For some reason, I was reminded of this article which was written during the War Between the States. Maybe it was those eyes and the sight of the Elk in Portland in flames:

“But, when the eye was turned from the contemplation of these social phenomena to a survey of the political institutions of the country, it required no remarkable strength of observation to discover that there were two distinct nationalities existing on the soil of Great Britain; and of the two, the Norman was the ruler.

The Teutonic and the Latin – the Northern and the Southern – types of civilization, with their diverse social systems, their incompatibility of ideas, opinions, and institutions, and their ineradicable national prejudices, were brought into the presence of each other, under the exigencies of a compulsory political union; and so long as the dominant race maintained the principles and institutions that were the native outgrowth of its civilization, its ascendancy was complete.

Aristocracy, based on the feudal relation, is the natural expression of the political thought of the Norman – a social condition, resting on the principle of subordination, and recognizing the family as the primary basis of social union. Democracy, founded on the idea of an unlimited individualism, and without any reference to the conservative organism of institutions, is the fundamental conception of the political philosophy of the Teuton or Saxon.

The English constitution is the result of a compromise between these two hostile systems, with the Norman element always in the ascendant, save during the brief reign of Cromwell.

But the Roundhead, at once a religious fanatic and a political agitator and reformer, could conceive of no government but the rule of the Saints, and form no other idea of the principles of civil liberty than what the levelling philosophy of the covenant taughtA bigot in faith and an idealist in speculation, his sentiments were violent and his convictions impracticable. A visionary from principle and a revolutionist from interest, his prejudices allowed no compromise, while his passions fed equally the flame of his cupidity and ambition. Austere in his morals and inflexible in his principles, he set up his own conduct as the standard of right, and sought to dictate the opinions and control the convictions of others. Rude in his manners and morose in his disposition, he practiced the profoundest dissimulation, while attaining credit for sincerity, and concealed his real character and designs under the cloak of hypocrisy. . . .

Opposite under the banner of the king, stood the Cavalier – the builder, the social architect, the institutionalist, the conservator – the advocate of rational liberty and the supporter of authority, as against the licentiousness and morbid impulse of unregulated passion and unenlightened sentiment. No idealist, enthusiast or speculative system-builder, upheaving ancient landmarks and overthrowing venerable monuments; but a realist, a practical and enlightened utilitarian, bowing to the authority of experience and acknowledging the supremacy of ideas, forms and institutions that had received the hallowing sanction of time . An institutor by genius and a ruler by race, his pride was at once the sword of his most eminent virtues and greatest weaknesses, while honor was the touchstone of his character. Chivalrous in sentiment and magnanimous in deed, glory was his ambition, and loyalty the inspirer of his every thought, impulse and action. Elevated in his ideas and tolerant in his views, his selfishness was vicarious and his very faults wore the semblance of virtue. Unyielding in his principles, but compromising in his opinions, his conduct was governed more by sentiment than reflection, and more by association than either. Courtly in his manners and splendid in his tastes, a knightly generosity he practiced even toward his foes, and never lost his faculties in volumptuousness. Without being an abject advocate of passive obedience or a supporter of arbitrary power, he yet took ground against the revolutionary party, not as an enemy to liberal institutions or a well-regulated liberty: but, discovering in the doctrines and principles of the revolution a greater danger to the social and political system than from the alleged existing abuses, he preferred yielding his loyalty rather to institutions than abstractions, and felt it a duty to attempt to quench the lights of the incendiary philosophy, whose torch had been applied to the noblest monuments of civil wisdom yet erected by the genius of man …”


J. Quitman Moore, “Southern Civilization; or, The Norman in America,” DeBow’s Review, 1862

About Hunter Wallace 12381 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

22 Comments

  1. Looks to me like President Trump & Attorney-General Barr started doin’ some ‘cancellation’ of their own today.

    Good for them.

    Let these effeminate white-hating White boys spend some time doing a wall meditation behind bars.

    Amazing what you learn as you get older!

    Why, I grew up in the Jim Crow, privileged to go to the finest schools, and I never once heard diddly-squat about no Elk or Buck being a Southern White Supremacist…

  2. Elks are Huwhite supremacist? I vow to never again eat Elk meat, no matter how darn tasty it is.

    In other stupid news, yesterday a freeway in St. Paul was blocked for two freakin’ hours by sub-room temp IQ niggers. Why? To protest the killing of a singer in Ethiopia. Seriously. What the frick do Minnesotans have to do with that, you cottonheaded sh!t-colored ninnymuggins?

    I’ve never before wanted to learn how to hotwire cars, but if I could “borrow” one to do some righteous “protestor” crushing, it would be worth it. As the worthless pigs and pols do nothing but mollycoddle the retarded malcontents, hopefully some of them will also be there if/when I go racing through the crowd.

  3. J. Quitman Moore wasn’t aware of Italian Anarchism. Pretty hard to blame Cromwell for resisting all things Italian, including the Italian Church.

    I can’t think of two more craven political leaders than Roman Catholics Nancy Pelosi and Kevin McCarthy.

    • I can think of many more politicians of different religious denominations equally as craven you fucking kike. It is hard to believe that a “White-Nationalist” like HW condones the kind of (((Divide-and-Conquer-Along-Christian-Denomination-Lines BS))) that Kraft Wurker promotes.

      • Still cant grasp the concept of a phony catholic or Christian krafty? Politicians especially don’t have a good record of honesty or morality even for that matter

        Kevin McCarthy a catholic all of a sudden? His wiki bio doesn’t even make one mention that he is a catholic. I know this might baffle you krafty but not all Irish are catholics haha lol

        • Dodged my question about Kevin McCarthys supposed “Catholicism” Krafty
          I’m not even catholic you goof lol I’m a Prot, born and raised

  4. I stand by my belief: most Whites are gone. We can never get them on our side. They have been programmed from birth to hate their own racial family and to hate America. Eventually, this hate will destroy them.

  5. “Back The Blue” – eh? Where are the fucking cops that we Whites are supposed to “Back” when all of these statues are being destroyed? I did see a story that some Portland cops refused to wear mandatory masks in a coffee shop and said “Fuck (Gov)Kate Brown.” to the barrista – way to take a stand, pigs.

  6. Why destroy a beautiful piece of art and someone’s hard work like that? Ever notice how ugly most antifa are? Physical manifestation of their ugly souls, if they even have them.

  7. The Elk was as noble a statue of an animal as could be. I have passed the point of rage about such things being destroyed.

    Our people’s minds have been poisoned, to the point that they no longer even know who they are, and will do the bidding of those who want the White race dead.

    • its pretty sickening …and those who aren’t openly anti white are apathetic to the point of destruction as well.
      They are worse than the whites who hate their people in my opinion.
      What is worse than being infected with the mind disease of apathy?

Comments are closed.