First day of White Boy Summer, touch grass pic.twitter.com/s0grQ6n56p
— White Boy Capital (@WhiteBoyCapital) June 20, 2025
Summer officially begins today, so make the most of every day, every hour, every minute. You only get about 80 summers your whole life, if you’re lucky, and even fewer being young, healthy, and adventurous. Use your time. pic.twitter.com/fIj40HGlRp
— Valentino (@EuroValentino) June 21, 2025
Saturday BBQ around mine. We have had a good drink. It’s been a lovely afternoon. It’s hot. The wine is flowing and the the drinks are on tap. Love to you and your family. Bosh?? pic.twitter.com/q5A7xdq4QF
— Thomas Skinner ? (@iamtomskinner) June 21, 2025
Skip to 4:07.
I laughed when I saw this.
This video really resonated with me after the past week.
Israel and FOX News aren’t going to ruin my summer and “blackpill” me.
We spent far too much time scrolling X, following and reacting to news and politics, bouncing up and down between being “white pilled” or “black pilled” as dopamine spikes and crashes. While it is important to stay informed about politics and current events, I know that I spend way too much time on it. It is a distraction that can easily steal your time and attention, ruin your mindset and sour your mood.
Just a heads up on Gent Z, most of you will not know this, he confessed in one of his content videos he was a former Goth who played guitar in a band around London,
So when you see him, picture him with long black hair, black eye makeup/ black nails, and his upper east London accent is not so Charming!
Cheers!
Rock on this Summer!
Win!
Europeans are now becoming as prudish, unnatural, alienated, perverted and addicted to porn as Americans. Nudism on the beach, in the age of million-fold mass immigration, would be interpreted by the invaders who are present everywhere as open and direct invitation to self-service and rape, which has already happened several times.
Not even open-air swimming pools and bathing lakes are safe from the assaults of these socially repressed culturally alien creatures anymore. Sooner or later, they will probably also either cover all bare-breasted public sculptures based on the classical Roman-Greek model with a veil or remove them completely through wanton vandalism.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/america-the-country-that-sees-26UsuO9aSCGTken17Svpyg
Heinz, I know my stance isn’t popular among so many people in our circles who worship Continental Europe and who are anti anything Anglo, but I personally think it wouldn’t hurt for Europeans to be more modest. I am so thankful that I am a descendant of British Victorian prudishness. Walking around parks, beaches, swimming pools, and saunas naked while in mixed company, is hardly a sign of being advanced. Continental Europeans ( some of you…. not all) are the only people in the world other than primitive tribes who are so laid back about nudity. And this laid back attitude started in the 20th century. Doesn’t this tell you it is abnormal?
You mention how more prudish societies like America and England are more perverted and obsessed with pornography. I agree that is a problem too, but it doesn’t mean public nudism is the answer. I would like to return to the 1950s Anglosphere and before in this regard. Western Civilization did just fine for centuries without this European naturism that I guess started in the 1930s, as well as this Anglosphere porn addicted perverted-ness that started in the 1960s and is just out of hand today.
Dear Courtney, I am generally against the organized public display of one’s own nudity against the express wish of clothed people (just as I am against smoking where there are non-smokers). But not where people decide to feel at one with nature. Whether this is as a couple in love at a remote quarry pond, or in a group of nature lovers.
But is the comparison with unhealthy passive smoking even true? Do prudes, the obdurate and the uptight have the right to force everyone else to conform to their values? As we can see, the question is not that easy to answer. Feminists hate naked men, but want to be naked themselves without being harassed by the invaders they protect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nacktfussball
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bara_Br%C3%B6st
As I read yesterday, this doesn’t seem to be as rare in America as I thought. I should have added that. However, I wouldn’t go into hysterics if I saw a naked person (e.g. a “streaker” in a stadium). I don’t consider this prudery to be a “civilizational superiority” that we should be more “modest” about, not in the slightest!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_nudity_places_in_North_America#Canada
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streaking
Quite the opposite: The so-called “prudes” should be more modest towards the nature that created them and not try to lock it out of life, and even consider this to be healthy, even the outgrowth of culture: The emperor is, was and always will be naked. Take a look at the sculptures by Gustav Vigeland, who has even been compared to Arno Breker, in Oslo’s Frogner Park.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Vigeland
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqslWZRNRhs
To consider sheer nudity already “an expression of primitivism” is as ridiculous as insane. Naked bodies are not in themselves something to be “banned”, but the perversions that are carried out with naked bodies (such as prostitution or pornography) desecrate and deface them. Leni Riefenstahl also recognized this, and after the war she was particularly fond of “natural” negro people who didn’t have a “Coca Cola” shirt on their bodies.
There are people who have never seen their own relatives naked, but only in their “civilized” disguise, their “uni-form”. Their prudery will never give them the idea that they have “missed out” on something in life. Naked bodies are practically only seen in sexually abusing/instrumentizing pornography these days, that’s what’s sick. And, as I said, the “logical” consequence of prudery.
I am merely against the organized shame culture that seeks to exclude everything natural from life. Of course, this includes not only nudity, but also death (or birth). We come into the world naked and leave it naked, no one needs to vainly “pride” themselves on their mere “veilings” between these reference points. In the past, people died in their families, today old people are shunted off to nursing homes where they languish alone.
The devastating hostility towards the body (Leibfeindlichkeit), which divides wholeness into “body and soul”, stems from Christian doctrine, which has its origins in Abrahamism. It cannot be maintained, because the body is the medium of the spirit. If you are in pain, you cannot be happy at the same time (unless you are a masochist, i.e. a pervert). And if you have brain damage, you also lose your “mind”.
This doctrine shifted well-being to the afterlife. Life there ultimately means suffering. The body and sexuality are tainted with guilt and shame, the “original sin”. Whoever controls the body also controls the soul, it was believed, and was “successful” in doing so. But as the word heil, which is related to holy, health and wholeness, already shows, this conjures up illness, self-alienation and disaster (Unheil).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_sana_in_corpore_sano
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind%E2%80%93body_dualism
It is also an inverted mechanistic view of the world to regard the body as a shell, an “instrument”, thus ultimately an interchangeable store of spare parts: the heart is a pump, the lungs are bellows, the brain a computer etc. Studies show that people with donor organs change their nature, because their original organs made their own contribution to the spiritual (see also phantom pain after amputations).
This body is the only one you have, no one can “be” without it, “think” without brain (brain death), breathe without lungs. Anyone who does not care for it but abuses it like a trash can, disregarding its needs, will be presented with the bill for it. Then, if he is still able to do so, he can console himself with the idea of an “afterlife”. We should therefore celebrate the body without neglecting or overemphasizing the spiritual.
Europe became permissive in the 20th century after WWI, when the British and American Empires that you admire dismantled Germany and Austria-Hungary. The Third Reich fought ferociously against that degeneracy as it emerged in the Weimar regime, and ultimately smashed it there. Then the British, American, and Soviet empires destroyed the Third Reich and other nationalist governments in 1945 and imposed the modern decadence we see in Europe today, enforced by ZOG firepower, legislation, and treaties.
Gaza Poverty Law Center, I think you are confusing Continental European naturism with Anglosphere prudishness, the latter which causes people to giggle like 12 year olds and constantly view pornography. Above I made a distinction between the two and criticized both. If you are saying the British were responsible for the laid back attitude towards mixed nudity you see in certain parks and beaches and saunas around Europe, well you are wrong. You don’t see this same culture in Britain or America or at least it isn’t mainstream or considered normal. Again, we are talking about two different issues.
Ray Stevens, as a typical Aquarian
(he is exactly 5 years older than Ke-
vin MacDonald) became a comedian.
One of his biggest hits was about a nu-
de runner. One can justifiably interpret
this act as a revolt against convention.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Streak_(song)
“The university has the largest number of Jewish undergraduate students in the country.” Who then might blackened “extremist” Damsky in the Jew York Times? (Btw., Damsky’s claim is true: The Civil War did not take place “for the abolition of slavery”; this has only been claimed for some time by those who seek to destroy America.) https://archive.is/O2o8H
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/is-luke-berryman-jewish-TYz6XfmhTqew8_onuRmzAQ
Whenever the Jews try to deceive us with the hackneyed phrase “humanity”, we know that professional liars are at work. https://archive.is/3fu7E Berryman is also parasitically riding the Nazi literature wave in order to make a handsome living. As for Leon Bass and Sebastian Haffner, whom he presents as heroes:
The anti-German Haffner had already been friends with the children of “influential” Jews as a child and was later married to a Jewish woman. He intended to have half a million of his fellow countrymen murdered because they wore what he considered to be the wrong uniform. https://codoh.com/library/document/sebastian-haffners-1942-call-for-mass-murder/
About Bass: “One person who figures prominently in ‘Liberators’ is Leon Bass, a black veteran who has made a second career speaking to gatherings sponsored by Jewish groups, and to classrooms of impressionable school children. He has been featured on the ‘MacNeil/Lehrer News Hour’ and in other major media as a liberator of Buchenwald.
In the Rosenblum/Miles film, and in his frequent lectures, Bass calls himself a ‘liberator.’ (New Republic, Feb. 8, p. 14) He has received numerous awards and large speaking fees for retelling his ‘liberation’ story, and was named co-chairman of the Philadelphia Council on the Holocaust. (New York Guardian, March 1993)
In fact, though, he only visited Buchenwald – on orders – five days after its liberation.
In both in the film and the book version of ‘Liberators,’ Bass also emotionally recounts how he and his unit, the 183rd Combat Engineers, built a bridge in a Belgian town during the December 1944 ‘Battle of the Bulge.’ He and his men worked ‘… in spite of strafing by the airplanes that would come down daily and machine-gun us. In spite of the shelling of the howitzers, we worked on that bridge.’ As a result, Bass continued, ‘many of my friends’ were killed building the bridge. (Liberators, p. 190)
In fact, the only soldier to die while constructing the bridge was one officer who was killed in an accident involving his jeep. There was no strafing by German planes. During its entire time of service in Europe, the 183rd lost three of its members, all due to accidents. (New York Guardian, March 1993)”
https://codoh.com/library/document/multi-media-liberators-project-exposed-as-fraud/
Heinz, I didn’t really understand some of your points above. I don’t support feminists but I don’t see them as a group that wants to be naked. Some advocate for being naked while men have to control their urges, which is an argument I find silly. I don’t see them as being the group that demands for men to cover up either.
You will see men and women equally naked in public in America but it is rare for both and done for different reasons. Women will do it for a sexual reason ( flashing to show their bodies to men in various situations) whereas men do it for comical reasons ( streaking, responding to a dare, mooning….).
Anyways overall we can agree to disagree. I think society needs to have a level of decency and for most of Western Civilization whites were modest people who had dignity. Even before Christianity….. in Ancient Greece men were nude only when women weren’t around and women typically stayed covered.
Then we do indeed have a different concept of decency, Courtney. Yours does indeed seem to come from Puritanism. When you say that American women only undress for sexual reasons, that confirms the attributions I have already made.
Perhaps they are so prudish that they only make love in the dark like shy nuns or inexperienced teenagers? Which in my opinion is as fulfilling as eating in the dark. Are you sure you live on the same continent as your fellow citizens?
A clothed body can be more more indecent than a naked one, for example “clothed” white prostitutes can be more more indecent than naked Amazonian Indians. This shame can neither be covered with make-up nor washed away.
Although Jesus showed leniency towards Mary Magdalene and warned those seeking to stone her: “Let he who is free from guilt cast the first stone!” It is not nudity that takes away decency. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to “cover up”.
The last shirt (the shirt of death) has no pockets in which you could “carry” anything anyway. It’s a bit like what Jesus said to the Pharisees (or was it the Philistines?): “You don’t become pure in God’s eyes by what you eat, but by what you say.”
I am not explicitly calling on anyone to be naked, but saying that nudity is not a cause for “shame and disgrace”. Have you seen Vigeland’s sculptures? They are very decent, true-to-life depictions. And who doesn’t like looking at an antique sculpture?
Whether the Greeks were really as insistent on dress code, I can’t verify, their art expresses something else. Can you imagine elves, fairies, nymphs and mermaids in bodices and corsets like in the Baroque era? Eva was naked like Lilith, but not “indecent”.
If sexuality is dominated and suppressed by antiquated superstitious moral concepts, then it can pervert into a loveless, insidious and malicious force in the subconscious if it is not lived out. Hypocrisy (Scheinheiligkeit) regularly turns out to be false holiness.
I tend to be suspicious of people who are too uptight, because everything has its opposite and is inextricably linked to it (yin & yang). When we meet someone who emphasizes his morals, decency and manners, a contrary suppressed trait is often unconsciously at work.
We know that a compulsion to clean are often suppressed feelings of guilt. Moral preachers tend to be the horniest dogs under the sun. And be careful with people who claim they never lie (that alone is the biggest lie). Regulation is a daughter of the death drive.
Heinz, I am fine with agreeing to disagree but I keep responding to get clarification on certain things you are saying. For instance I don’t understand the following paragraph you wrote:
“Perhaps they are so prudish that they only make love in the dark like shy nuns or inexperienced teenagers? Which in my opinion is as fulfilling as eating in the dark. Are you sure you live on the same continent as your fellow citizens?”
I never said American women act like nuns when having intercourse in the privacy of a bedroom. There is a difference between that and walking in a park naked.
I notice in a lot of your examples you only focus on women. This is typical in a country like America where female nudity is considered sexual and male is considered funny but both are considered inappropriate ( I didn’t create this concept of funny vs sexual but this is just how it is). In Europe I get the impression that nudity is viewed equally for both sexes. So I just find it interesting that in a lot of your examples you are only talking about women and not men. I bring this up mostly out of curiosity and not to argue. As a European I figured you would talk about men too when giving examples to make your point. Or maybe you are just trying to relate to me as an American.
Dear Courtney, thank you very much, I appreciate your interest. Unfortunately, comments on my part in which nude men were also discussed have not (yet?) been activated, but men can also be seen in Vigeland Park (there are some videos about it on YouTube).
The fact that naked femininity is equated exclusively with sexuality is probably a consequence of Christianization and the moral judgement that goes hand in hand with it. Naked women are seen as witches who are in league with the devil and intend to tempt the weak spirit of men.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Ricardo_Falero
We now live in a “shame(hair)-less society” (Schamhaar means pubic hair). Not even the biblical fig leaf still exists as a privacy shield. Man is desecrated and limited to his genitals through pornocratization.
I strongly suspect that the unmanly fear of mature femininity is also behind this, as is the case with the popularization of this whole infantilizing manga culture that caters to the cuteness scheme. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuteness
I don’t think Americans are very different from European whites. Perhaps the Amish or Mennonites have stricter moral codes. In contrast to them, who have many children with one partner, polygamy was not taboo among the Mormons for a long time.
I think it’s right and good when women and girls don’t dress and act like hookers, and when American women don’t do that, they are respectable. But as everything has two sides, you can overdo it with abstinence and impose it on yourself as a kind of “divine punishment”.
“And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it…” (Genesis 1:28)
“Old Swede” is “the first immigrant of Hamburg.” At the time of its formation (by breaking off of a rock), there were no Swedes. It was recovered from the Elbe in 1999 during a deepening of the fairway, weighs 217 t.
Parts of present-day Hamburg, where it was found, did belong to Denmark in history, but unlike Pomerania, never to Sweden. What is called Burg in German is Borg in Scandinavian languages and Borough in English.
“Old Swede” has a double meaning like Findling: it refers to a gigantic boulder that was transported from Scandinavia to the North German Plain by glaciers during Ice Age, and it means a foundling (an abandoned child).
https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Alter_Schwede_(Redewendung)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Alte_Schwede
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IvGSWr9FuI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpS9nlLI59c
In Switzerland there is a mountain village called Sabbione, which is only inhabited in summer as a tourist attraction because of its remoteness, and where there is a house with such a colossus as a roof. An author from there:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKHKoCK4iNE
https://wondersofswitzerland.com/posts/sabbione
https://houseofswitzerland.org/swissstories/society/gori-ticino-united-states
Why Afrikaans sounds more similar to Low German
than Dutch could also be because the Low Frankish
Afrikaans is strongly influenced by “Saxon” English,
which is ultimately a kind of sibling of Low German.
The similarity between Franconian & Saxon, which
have an unmistakable common root, is astonishing.
The Christianized Franks subjugated pagan Saxons.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/is-it-possible-that-afrikaans-czWYlOaTTqGmxU2GleGV4A
“Low Saxon – The Secret Language of NW-Europe”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsE3RbYiDVs
No playlist exists,
but I created one.
https://linkmix.co/39948685
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/https-www-youtube-com-watch-v-4uoEFNXFTlyIGrgEJIfe.A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYgAfw6-tmI
Description: “Martin ter
Denge, a Low Saxon enthu-
siast and artistic regional
language fanatic, performs
his song ‘Dit is Twente’.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziaojKtVlEw
Translation lyrics:
A man sings about New Orleans
Blue Eyes from New York
The French find Paris very beautiful
The Irish sing about Cork
Wherever you go
They write songs about their places.
It must be beautiful there,
But they shouldn’t exaggerate
Because this is Twente, this is my place
No matter how far I go from here
I always come back
This is Twente, this is my place
I could have been born anywhere
But it just happened to be here
Somewhere else it must also be very beautiful
I haven’t denied that.
I’d like to go and have a look there sometime
But I always end up back here.
Here lives my people
Here I know my neighbor and his brother too
Here I know every little tree
Here people walk just as beautifully as I do
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtWLVEYAFOw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPhP9A_svmo
Mr. ter Denge: “We’re Dutch, we’re not German.” Well, dear Martin: You are undoubtedly kinda German – you’ve just forgotten it! Even your founding father William of Orange sings in your national anthem that he is “of German blood”. Of course, the Germanophobes among the Wikipedia admins falsify this to “Dutch” in the English translation.
What’s more, the Dutch’s choice of partner seems to contradict their supposed reservations about their neighbors. According to the 2014 study, no one in Europe prefers Belgians, French, Dutch and Portuguese of either sex. British women are also not sought after. Spanish women are said to be the most desirable for almost everyone else.
https://i.ibb.co/CK84kWxL/dutchlovedeutsch.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frau_Antje
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0X6yc7DA5mM
The reality:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLG5TLerZ-I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vElGt0mcYpE
This is clearly a deliberate reinterpreta-
tion of a genuine Irish rune stone for po-
litical reasons. The true inscription reads:
“In 1200 years time there will be an impostor
standing on this spot, pretending to be a scholar
and distorting my meaning. You will recognize
him by a leathern flat cap that hides his baldness
and which he wears even in his sleep and in the
shower. There is nothing but hot air underneath.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaSd1Dg1QZk
Only PhD Empty Shell himself knows why he
quotes Jews in connection with Germanism,
but wears a Thor’s hammer around his neck.
https://scottshelldotnet.wordpress.com/about-me/
Moreover, it is cowardly and indecent to
hide behind Jews who insult other Jews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoly_Liberman
Jackie Cowfart in Sweden, his evil-minded Jew-lower is the insurance policy not to fall back into alcoholism through mead. No ridiculous stick figures being interpreted here, Jackie is here to help enlighten the cause of the Germanoid race with his Montana Highland knowledge. But why are Swedes now called Williams? That is against all linguistic logic!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6iV-EMc3N8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrik_Williams
According to his runic T-shirt, Prof. Williams wants to be kissed. By what, by whom, by the poetic Edda? Or are the muses meant to inspire his research findings? We clearly need to add the female side of humanity here, dottier means daughter. What these poor creatures had to go through! Always this male violence/Gewalt! Oy Gevalt!
https://ok.ru/video/3843673492135
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Juniper_Tree_(film)
Frau Björk got a supporting role
https://ok.ru/video/9464712858310
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Northman
Happiness is the main reason for life. Finally get it!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncULt2w8IDA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lena_Anderssen
This was finally understood on the Faroe Islands
(except by Frodi Midjord, Mark Weber’s best friend,
who today refuses to continue “Holocaust” denial).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1-LCixbumI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbgjQZUSiCw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0br4Ujitu0
The “liberation” of women is the most important thing of all!
ps “runology”
Of course, one could cynically remark:
“Dis is high culture, folks! Every point
has a meaning, though unclear which.”
We must realize that 1200
years ago we had no other
way of expressing ourselves.
You think your words are English,
born of Shakespeare, Lincoln, Twain—
but listen closer:
your tongue is thick with forests,
your breath is mist on the Rhine.
When you wake, you lift your hand—
not a Latin “manus,”
but a hand, as in “Hand,”
the same as your Saxon kin.
You walk the street, not boulevard,
you turn the corner, not the angle,
you find your house, not mansion—
each word a root from northern soil.
You eat bread, not baguette,
you drink water, not aqua,
you call your mother, not mater,
your father, not pater—
these are the words of hearth and home,
the words that built your bones.
You love, you hope, you fear,
you laugh, you cry, you sleep—
not “amour,” not “spes,” not “timor,”
but “love,” “hope,” “fear,”
“laugh,” “cry,” “sleep”—
all Germanic, all yours.
You count your days, your nights,
your sun, your moon, your stars—
not “sol,” not “luna,” not “stella,”
but “sun,” “moon,” “star”—
the world as seen by Saxon eyes.
Even the land beneath your feet—
“earth,” not “terra,”
the sky above your head—
“sky,” not “caelum”—
these are the words you trust
when all else falls away.
So when you speak,
know this:
your daily bread, your hopes and fears,
the hands you hold, the dreams you dream—
these are not borrowed,
these are not foreign,
these are the words your ancestors spoke
by firelight, under northern stars.
You do not just speak English—
you speak a living echo of Deutsch,
the deep music of your blood.
So say it now, and know it’s true:
I speak more German than I ever knew.
I wake, I rise, I stir, I spring,
I stand, I walk, I run, I swing.
I eat, I chew, I bite, I gnaw,
I drink, I gulp, I swig, I draw.
I see, I look, I watch, I spy,
I hear, I hark, I heed, I pry.
I speak, I say, I tell, I call,
I shout, I cry, I sing, I bawl.
I make, I build, I craft, I shape,
I break, I smash, I tear, I scrape.
I give, I take, I lend, I keep,
I sow, I reap, I wake, I sleep.
I love, I like, I want, I yearn,
I hate, I scorn, I spurn, I burn.
I fight, I strive, I win, I lose,
I choose, I pick, I seek, I muse.
I shit, I piss, I spit, I sweat,
I fuck, I breed, I wed, I bet.
I laugh, I grin, I smirk, I smile,
I weep, I sob, I wail, I rile.
I think, I deem, I dream, I brood,
I know, I guess, I doubt, I mood.
I work, I toil, I sweat, I strive,
I live, I die, I grow, I thrive.
In every word, a root runs deep—
From Saxon shore to Northman’s sweep.
In tongue and tale, in kin and land,
The old words walk, still hand in hand.