What is there to protest?
The only thing that comes to mind is that the Trump administration is subservient to Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel, but that point is being made and rapidly gaining ground without street activism. Pretty much all the large alt media platforms – Infowars, Breaking Points, Tucker – hammer Israel every day. There is no one left who is going to be persuaded to dislike Israel because of street activism.
“During President Trump’s first turn in the White House, right-wing extremists like the Proud Boys were on the streets, weekend after weekend, raising their voices — and oftentimes their fists — about issues such as immigration, the squelching of conservative speech and the removal of Confederate-era statues.
But in the first seven months of Mr. Trump’s second term, there has been a conspicuous absence of far-right demonstrations. And that, some leaders of the movement say, is because the president has effectively adopted their agenda.
“Things we were doing and talking about in 2017 that were taboo, they’re no longer taboo — they’re mainstream now,” said Enrique Tarrio, the chairman of the Proud Boys, who took part in many of those early far-right rallies. “Honestly, what do we have to complain about these days?” …
Last week, in fact, on the eighth anniversary of the violent far-right rally in Charlottesville, Va., where neo-Nazis marched by torchlight chanting about immigrants and Jews, Augustus Sol Invictus, a Florida lawyer who helped organize the event, marveled at how thoroughly the Trump administration had adopted a position that had once been on the fringes of political discourse.
“Eight years ago you were an extremist if you protested being replaced by immigrants,” Mr. Invictus wrote on social media. “Your life was over if you talked about stopping or reversing it. Now it is official @WhiteHouse policy.” …”
2017 was different.
In 2017, it felt like we had won a huge victory, but the old guard of the Republican Party was still in charge, which is why all that populist energy spilled out into the streets. We also learned our lessons about the downsides and vulnerabilities of engaging in street activism to “own the libs.”
It is urgently important to make sure that the South, and White Evangelical Christians in general, LEAD the movement for an America First foreign policy.
The fact that our people are FOLLOWING, rather than LEADING, this change is a first rate catastrophe.
The Jews plan to make our people into the scapegoats for all the crimes of Israel and all the crimes of the US government under the control of the Israel Lobby.
Never mind that this genocide was initiated by Anthony Blinken and Chuck Schumer. Jewish media, and Jewish academia, and the Jewish entertainment industry will make it their business to ensure that 100% of all the blame is laid on the shoulders of the White South. “We Jews were moderate liberal Zionists who wanted to reign in Netanyahu, but those all-powerful Christian Zionist extremists FORCED us to commit a genocide!”
That is why the Jews are so unworried about all the anger they’ve aroused with their sadistic torment of the Palestinians. The Jews are GLAD that anger has been aroused, because they plan to direct that anger against OUR people.
Thank God for Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene!
We urgently need to wake our people up. If street activism doesn’t work, then we need to find tactics which do work. Maybe we could all pledge to each purchase 100 copies of “The Israel Lobby” and give a copy to each of our 100 closest friends and family? But certainly everyone who has a media platform of some sort needs to make absolutely clear that we do NOT support Trump’s foreign policy.
Let our people know that it is OK to support Trump on immigration, and it is OK to support Trump in the culture war, but it is most certainly NOT OK to support Trump’s Israel First foreign policy.
ITS A TRAP!
I’m also worried that we are herded into massive war with those “others” . In the Europe, hostility against immigrants is brewing and it is difficult to explain that massive war and millions of conservative young white men dead is exactly what Jews want. War with diversity will be the end of Europe. Childless Europe will not survive another WWI and WWII style bloodbath.
evangelicals?
the cucks?
Christianity is the “trap”, always has been
Nobody is ever going to take LARPing neopagans seriously. The West is Christendom, Christendom is the West. Most of the Right is Christian and counts y’all in along with the Wiccans and Druids. Get over yourselves.
“It is urgently important to make sure that the South and White Evangelical Christians in general, Lead the movement for an America first Foreign policy” agreed, agreed, perfectly said, if I might add, marching shoulder to shoulder, with thee Southern, White , Evangelical, Thee Southern, White, Bourbonite, we thee people, need their Intellectual expertise, their wisdom, their experience in matters of culture, politics, finance, along with our Southern, Martial traditions and thee Lords guiding hand, Forward we shall go …….
‘What is there to protest?’
Only a fraction of the necessaries have happened, so far.
” violent far-right rally in Charlottesville, Va.,”
Notice how they always skew the narrative to a very deceitful slant, whether overtly or subtly, often both.
Rightist demonstrations were effectively outlawed during Trump 1.0 and the ban is still in place.
Things are more interesting in Europe, outside of Russia. And just now Farage has veered right, promising arrests of invaders and remigration. He is not serious of course, he is a frontman for the ethnic bankers in the city. The Homeland party is forcing Reform’s hand, making them pretend to be pro English.
The Proud Boys anyway were pure Federals, a branch of the FBI. The fact remains, rightist protests are effectively illegal in America. The only organic ones I can think of are the Patriot Front, which I admire, and your White Lives Matter protest, which was awesome. But a one off.
NY Times=Commie RAT POS vermin.
I can’t believe the government is just now taxing the parasites remittances. Americans are taxed to hilt for EVERYTHING, yet the scumbags send their free money home to live like kings for when they inevitably go back to their home stys like the disgusting pigs they are.
I’m not going to smile until the White birth rate outpaces the nonWhite birth rate and nonWhite immigration is reversed with millions of nonWhite legals formally kicked out.
The Jews could do whatever sick thing they like to the Mohammedans if they just left us alone to have healthy White countries. In fact it p*sses me off seeing Whites “wake up to the Jews” because of Gaza of all things yet they slept through everything the Jews have done to their own White race!
The Jews I have no idea whether they are God’s chosen or not, but I know one thing, they aren’t going anywhere. More guts balls and brains than any other group. Putin gives nothing about anything other than Slavs he will not be involved in this. America and Canada will most likely sink back into the abyss when this is done. The English aren’t having it though and neither are the Germans. Maybe they will choose to release America from the shackles for United Dogfighting Championship #3? Depends on whether it’s in their best interest or not. Take note and act accordingly. The alternative is Sharia Law and Dhimmitude.
Good take Brian, you’ve got the right idea.
I like MTG’s America Only approach. But the sad thing is there would be no radical Zionists in the Middle East to start with if there were never a Yankee Empire to emerge on the world scene. We enable killers like Netanyahu using our money/military/tech/etc to genocide all their neighbors as they try to resettle themselves through human effort without the guidance/protection/peace/etc that will be when Christ Returns and resettles all the scattered tribes without any glitches.
CSA Only! If the CSA had won 160 years ago, many of the world’s problems today would have never developed to start with.
“The consolidation of the states into one vast republic, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of that ruin which has overwhelmed all those that have preceded it.”
— General Robert E. Lee, in reply letter to Lord Acton, 12-15-1866.
Who wrote the Protocols? And why? Are they a forgery, or a clever fiction, or are they an actual factual transcript of a speech by a berserk Jew at a Zionist conference in the 1890s?
Why is Zionism never even mentioned in the Protocols? If the Tsar’s secret police wrote the Protocols why then was the original document written in French and only later translated into Russian?
But who actually wrote the Protocols? A brilliant article posted on Unz makes an educated guess, a very good one in my opinion. Balzac wrote the Protocols, the original version, during the Revolution of 1848. Then he promptly died, in 1850, and the Protocols remained unfinished. They circulated for decades within French Masonic circles, no one daring to publish them (for fear of the Jews) and eventually made their way to Russia, and were published in Russian, as the Jews had not yet taken control of Russia in the 1890’s.
Lost Illusions, Balzac called it. Or as they say on the Internet, Open Your Eyes. This article by Erikson is why I still read Unz.
@Rangewolf,
“They (Protocols) circulated for decades within French Masonic circles…”
Incorrect. You are conflating Balzak the author’s membership in Masonry with his father Balzak the nobleman’s Masonic involvement. The later occurred in tbe middle 1700s nearly three quarters of a century before Bazlak the author presumably wrote them. Balzak the noblemen eventually ceased his Masonic involvement.
In fact, the theory of the Protocols origination with Balzak owes a line of departures from him to his lover and late wife the Polish-Russian noblewoman, the Countessa Ewelina Hanska. Various copies, all substantially revised show a clear connection with Balzak and are rewritten to make various enemies of the Papacy the antagonist in the Protocols.
Indeed, Balzak the author, eas actually a devoted Papist, a Jesuit, and politically fought rigorously against enemies of the Church and the Throne and Altar movement. He is also an influential writer whose style influenced modern literature. He was a deep state Papist agent of ghe highest level.
The original Protocols placed the Anglo-Protestant Masons as the enemy, not “Duh, Jews.” For whatever reasons, presumably some treaties the British signed with the signed around that time, Balzak reworked it to say it was the Russians. This also most likely had to do anti-Russian diplomatic efforts.
Eventually, this version of the Protocols fell into the Tsar’s hands via the Countessa, most likely thru her Secretary who was actually Tsarist secret agent. Once in the hands of the Tsars it was changed again, to make the Jews the antagonist. This is when the most advanced revolutionary accusations were incorporated into thr Protocols, most likely to dosguise the Russian’s own involvement in such activities by placong the blame on “Duh, Jews.”
In truth, the Protocols is an example of deep state propaganda that breaks its containment, in this case the Papacy and its Holy League of supporters. First it was the Anglo-Protestants who were the antagonists of story, then later the Russians, then later still the Jews. Eventually the Okrahna, Russians secret police perfected the book, reworked it again and its final most read edition made “Duh, Jews” the antagonists. In reality, its the effing Papists, especially the Jesuits, who initiated this malicious book, not “Duh, Jews.”
https://theravenscall.substack.com/p/against-miscegenation
Excellent.
Skimming through Hofstede’s book https://linkmix.co/42869516,
I stumbled across an interesting paragraph on page 85:
“Feelings toward other nations vary not only with uncertainty avoidance but also with masculinity. The combination was illustrated in Figure 6.1. The Axis powers from World War II (Germany, Italy, and Japan) were all located in the lower right-hand quadrant: strong uncertainty avoidance plus masculinity. Under the conditions prior to the war, ethnocentric, xenophobic, and aggressive tendencies could get the upper hand in these countries more easily than in countries with different culture patterns. Fascism and racism find their most fertile ground in cultures with strong uncertainty avoidance plus pronouncedly masculine values. The paradox is that these same values in the postwar period contributed to these countries’ fast economic recovery. A culture’s weaknesses may in different circumstances become its strengths.”
Let’s be blunt: either Hofstad’s theory is flat?out wrong, or he didn’t have the backbone to follow it through. If you ask me, war is nothing less than the ultimate exercise in uncertainty. You could just as well call it a “collective high?tech thrill ride of destruction.”
And the same goes for impulsive, reckless, over?the?top macho behavior—like some drunk weaving through traffic at 90 miles an hour. That’s not about logic, that’s about adrenaline and testosterone. In other words: male territory.
Flip side? The neurotic obsession with safety, the compulsive need for harmony, the pathological avoidance of conflict and risk. Let’s be honest: those are traits you’ll mostly find on the female end of the spectrum.
And here’s the kicker: of all people, the effeminized, ultra?“liberal” Brits—the folks who’ve been bowing to a “queen” for centuries—score lower than most on the “uncertainty avoidance index.” You couldn’t make this up.
Remember what I’ve said before: the titans who built Germany’s so?called economic miracle? Most of them were ex?Hitler Youth. That means they grew up being hammered into discipline and self?discipline. They were hardened. Same story in Japan.
Back then, it was considered shameful to act soft, to whine, to turn trivial nonsense into a “problem” instead of, you know, solving it. Compare that to today’s world of fragile egos and tantrums over nothing. The old saying still applies: “A Germanic heart knows no pain.”
Now, don’t get me wrong: I’m no fan of blind recklessness. But I do believe in calculated risk—real, measurable risk. No risk, no fun. War doesn’t count. Neither does running into a bunch of Middle Eastern migrants unarmed like that young American fool in Dresden did.
Calculated risk means something else. It means moving in silence, beneath the radar of public attention, making progress toward your goal while looking like an innocent bystander. That’s Sun Tzu 101.
ps
Entertaining theories that sometimes make you smile. I find it difficult to apply such generalizing categorizations. I am understood pretty much everywhere, provided it is within our cultural sphere. By that I mean, of course, northwestern Europe and the English-speaking countries overseas.
One could also say the “Germanic” countries. Even a Pole or an Italian can be very foreign to me. However, I would argue that it is less culture than ideology that forms a peer group. In other words, the way of thinking largely stems from one’s outlook on life and political stance.
Thus, there is no misunderstanding between Americans and me, provided that our basic intentions are the same. Between me and a fellow countryman with vastly divergent political convictions, the conflict can be much more irreconcilable. Much of what I say to Americans is not understood at all by many of my fellow countrymen.
You put on the glove of the English language, so to speak, but still live out your mentality, which is inseparably intertwined with you. I like to communicate in English as a kind of mental exercise: “How do I have to express myself so that I am understood?”
But I enjoy talking as imaginatively as possible in my native language just as much. In principle, I always remain the same: I would express exactly what I want to say in any language. If I had to work in a Chinese company, I would have to bend over backwards.
But your environment rubs off on you, and if all Chinese people conceal their true thoughts out of respect, you end up doing the same. As a great lover of East Asian cuisine, I often visit Asian shops, where many of these hypocritically grinning, slant-eyed dwarf people communicate.
Fortunately, I don’t understand a word, but just think: “These people have a strange way of quacking, like on the duck pond in the garden.” But since they are very distant and at the same time taciturn and non-confrontational, I don’t care whether they stand around or are invisible.
MTG and others are on the right track. America needs to get rid of these Jews/pro-Jewish orgs/etc who are buying out our politicians to support these radical genocidal Zionists who are trying to take over their former ancient territory in the Middle East.
Now, even Jewish Americans are speaking up and offering practical solutions not necessarily on how to break the Jewish grip on our politicians and their enabling of genocide in Gaza, but on how to begin the process to stop the problems by having the USA not veto a two-state solution in the UN vote as they have in the past.
The Empire needs to dump the Zionists and their promoters by FORCING the state of Israel (Judah) to accept a two state solution and add Palestine as the newest member nation to the UN.
YouTube:
Has Gaza made the UN irrelevant? | Jeffrey Sachs | Real Talk
https://youtu.be/beHEa-x4GU0?si=fBL7pJsS1mp4FYqX