Greg Conte has written another thought provoking piece at National Socialist World on the religious infighting that has consumed the “NS” movement over the past year or so.
“Today is the second anniversary of Hamas’ bold and noble attack on the Zionist terror-state and pedo-scam homebase. Since then the whole world has come to understand the full evil of Israel and its supporters within the US government and elite.
The Jews have to win in Gaza. They have to maintain control of International Capital. Above all, they have to prevent the peoples of America and Europe from rebelling against Jewish rule.
They cannot allow the consolidation of a secular, pro-White resistance against Jewish Power in the United States.
They have a bunch of tactics. But right now, the one that they are pushing most aggressively is sowing religious dissent. By this means, they hope to keep their potential opponents divided and thereby to continue their rapacious and murderous world-wide schemes.
Religion is an easy place to attack. As usual, the Jews are offering two options, both poisoned. One is a hateful breed of atheism that focuses on the so-called “Christian Question”—that is, the idea that Christianity itself is some kind of evil Jewish mind-virus that prevents Aryans from resisting Jewish Power.
The other is deceptively called “Christian Nationalism” though it is neither Christian nor Nationalist. It isn’t really even political. It’s just a vague call to put narrow denominational interests ahead of our whole race’s God-given duty to stand up to Jewish war, mass-murder and state-sanctioned pedophilia. …”
I have a different perspective.
I keep coming back to this photo of George Lincoln Rockwell and the Hate Bus in 1961. It captures something essential about the antisocial role of “NS” in American history.
“NS” is a sideshow.
It has always been about trolling for attention.
It has always been a politically toxic marginalized subculture. It has never held a single office or position of power at the state, local or federal level in the United States in the 80 years since Hitler’s death. Rockwell himself was assassinated by one of his own dysfunctional followers.
From the founding of the American colonies at Jamestown in 1607 to Donald Trump’s second term in 2025, the “NS” subculture has contributed nothing to America’s racial history. Think about that for a minute. The White settlers who fought and expelled the Indians were not “NS.” The slaveowners who enslaved blacks were not “NS.” Every single law that was ever passed in American history that codified some type of racial distinction over the course of three centuries had nothing to do with “NS.”
As I have explained, the broader White Nationalist movement has been a religious ghetto for decades where secular atheists, agnostics and pagans are massively overrepresented relative to their actual share of the White population. This is particularly true on the far end of the spectrum called “NS” where several generations of cranks have created “racial religions” as a substitute for “Jewish Christianity.” They send me their literature all the time rehearsing the same arguments which arrives every month in our P.O. Box. Twenty years ago, the same people were peddling Cosmotheism and Creativity.
The overwhelming majority of White Americans who are irreligious, atheist, agnostic or pagan gravitate toward liberalism, progressivism or libertarianism. It is only a tiny minority of extreme outliers – maybe 2 out of 100 – who incline toward fascism. These misfits do not fit into either political coalition. They are too racist and authoritarian for the Left, but too anti-Christian and socially liberal for the Right. They are mainly known for their lack of self awareness in demanding that America be recast in their image. They do not see themselves as outliers or understand where they fit into the American political landscape.
Picture this.
White Nationalism is a sort of religious ghetto. “NS” is like a block within the larger ghetto. American conservatism or the Right is like the larger town which contains the ghetto. The rules of entry and exit into and out of the ghetto and policing used to be a lot stricter than they are now.
There is currently a riot going on within the “NS” world against Christians which has been triggered by the fact that conservatism has radically changed over the past six years. The mainstream right and fringe right have been redefined by Trump and the MAGA movement which has erased traditional boundaries. The intensification of political polarization has pushed millions of conservatives into fringe right territory. Paleoconservatism, for example, is now an important faction in Trump’s base. Much of what used to be fringe right discourse a decade ago like, say, hating Antifa is now mainstream.
The view from inside the “NS” block of the White Nationalist ghetto is that White Christian Nationalism is a Jewish conspiracy against them to derail “the consolidation of a secular, pro-White resistance against Jewish Power.” They see themselves, not as delusional fringe outliers, but as the main characters in our history. They also incorrectly assume that on the day when “White people wake up” that it will take on the form that suits their ideological convictions and religious preferences when there is no reason to believe this. They are angry that their toy train isn’t the one leaving the train station.
Why would it be?
Every previous racial and cultural awakening and nativist movement in American history has been driven by the radicalization of Protestants and specifically White evangelical Protestants. When it happened last time in the 1920s, it came in the form of 100% Americanism, Prohibition, America First. Even back then, the Klan claimed it was not driven by hatred of Jews, Catholics or Negroes.
This is America.
Adolf Hitler is dead.
The NSDAP ceased to exist a lifetime ago.
This isn’t National Socialist Germany in the 1930s.
White Protestants have always been the main character in America’s racial history. “Heritage American” is the fashionable euphemism we prefer to use today instead of “Protestant” or “Nordic.”
What happened over the last decade that transformed our politics? White Protestants were radicalized by gay marriage, transgenderism, immigration and Wokeism. That explains everything like Charlie Kirk celebrating the legalization of homosexuality in Botswana in Trump’s first term to where he was at when he was assassinated in Utah last month and his memorial service in a NFL stadium.
Greg is also mistaken about the potency of White Christian Nationalism.
1. White evangelical Protestants dominate Southern politics.
2. This is more than enough to be the dominant faction in the Republican Party.
3. Republicans dominate the country through the shape of the Senate and Electoral College.
4. Greg is mischaracterizing White Christian Nationalism by projecting a level of denominational infighting that really doesn’t exist – White evangelicals, mainline Protestants, Catholics, Mormons and all types of White Christians are part of the MAGA base and voted to empower Trump. Theobros and Trad Caths set aside their differences and cooperate more easily than “NS” activists.
5. This coalition is strong enough to control all three branches of the federal government. Unlike in Trump’s first term, “True Conservatism” is no longer holding it back either. Trump’s inner circle is now willing to take the most extreme measures like invoking the Insurrection Act or persuading the Supreme Court to nuke the Voting Rights Act to gerrymander a Republican House majority.
6. Finally, even states that are Christian, but religiously and racially diverse like Texas and Florida have defied expectations in this highly polarized political environment. Cultural polarization works politically against the Left because White college educated voters are a minority.
“NS” activists are butthurt about this development.
They are having an internal meltdown about Christianity because of the rise of White Christian Nationalism and the success it is having in transforming our politics. They are angry that it is White Christians who are closing the borders, banning Antifa, rolling back anti-Whiteism. They see this as a threat to them primarily because it holds up a mirror to their own internal dysfunction.
Winning is bad for “NS.”
The success we are having is unforgivable. It is bad for “the consolidation of a secular, pro-White resistance” which looks like a sideshow. It has always been a clown car or sideshow, but until now the great hope has been that one day White America would wake up and that when that happened somehow “NS” would triumph and their fantasy world would come true.
One last thing.
Charlottesville was the proof of the failure of the “race first” concept.
By putting “race first” and being a “secular, pro-White resistance against Jewish power,” the Alt-Right basically set aside the question of morality. This created the space for “NS” schizos like James Fields, Jr. to show up at the Unite the Right rally. He drove his car into the crowd, got everyone sued and ended the Alt-Right with one single blow. Lack of moral agreement one shotted the Alt-Right.
We don’t need the “NS” activists who spend all their time attacking Christianity to accomplish anything in American politics. Those people are an albatross to anyone who is sane, sober and who had a good moral upbringing and being associated with them is nothing but a legal and political liability. They are weird outliers and their loud presence online disguises their negligible resonance in White America.
Note: As for White Nationalism, which is not necessarily the same thing as the antisocial “NS” weirdos, there shouldn’t be any doubt that the path forward is through mainstreaming. The radicalization of White Protestants is an unalloyed positive development. White Protestants have been persuaded to see Antifa as their enemy and adopt much of the Alt-Right’s old agenda, frame and talking points. The next step is to build momentum and move from anti-anti-Whiteism to explicit pro-White politics.
Hitler painted. Not badly at all. None of
us could do that off the cuff. If only he
had remained a mediocre postcard painter!
I think the post WW2 propaganda you have been saturated in has clouded your reason.
The main issue with Christianity is it’s egalitarian, universalist moral nature and hostility to non-Christians. If Christians are the only player on the right then we will live under Mosaic law and essentially go right back to the 60s after 2 decades of doing nothing but symbolic actions like banning pornography that don’t answer to the root issues (in porns case, inability for men to find suitable women).
We had the GOP turn evangelical in the 80s and that just brought us the Clintons. As Barry Goldwater said they were gonna destroy the GOP which was accurate as we had the neocons for 2 decades.
Christianity is fundamentally unable to save the west because it’s values are Arabic, not European. It is a religion made by Paul to uplift the position of Jews, adopted by the Roman government to quiet rowdy slaves and workers, and also not even reality.
We just need American nationalism with a focus on only white immigration, and deport brown noncitizens especially the Indians. Actually deport the citizen Indians too.
‘If only he
had remained a mediocre postcard painter’
Germany would be an impoverished dying Bolshevik slave colony. Europe, perhaps all the world , would be under communist tyranny.
Hitler was the bulwark that saved Europe from communist conquest.
It’s true: he was a fairly decent painter of landscapes. Hey…I *like* landscapes.
If only he’d have left the politics (which he didn’t know a bloody thing about) behind entirely, he could have made his mark in a way that wouldn’t resign his name to eternal disdain from normal White people.
Yeh, and Germany could have starved.
Serious question for Hunter: Which would you rather accept as part of the “movement” you belong to?
1): a lower-class, trashy White single mother with White children, who doesn’t go to church, doesn’t vote and supports Palestine, or:
2): an upper-middle-class White conservative man with an Asian wife who has traditional family values, is an avid churchgoer and MAGA voter who supports Israel?
I’d love to know.
What do you mean by movement?
A political movement is an organized attempt to capture political power to advance shared interests and policy goals. The pro-Israel MAGA voter with the Asian wife who voted for Trump is part of his coalition and movement and thus empowered people like Stephen Miller to crush Antifa, close the border, purge the FBI, etc.
The lower-class, secular, trashy White single mother who rejects politics and political engagement is not part of any political movement. She is not trying to accomplish anything. She is not trying to move the country in her preferred direction. The people who share her apolitical mindset are similarly bystanders who submit to being governed by people like the MAGA guy.
BTW, this is why the “NS” movement isn’t a political movement. It is why it doesn’t move, attract popular support or accomplish any of its goals. It rejects the very idea of political activity and engagement because “the System” is something that happens to them. This peculiar type of despairing helplessness and loser identity and attitude is also why it differs in very substantial ways from historic National Socialism.
That question isn’t in good faith at all.
For the first part: I know a couple women exactly like the one described by you. They all have BLACK children. No…I don’t want them anywhere near any movement I’d ever belong to.
That man in the second situation you describe, though, sounds like a nice fella that you can have a beer with and hash out your political differences without too much difficulty or animosity. Heck, he sounds like John Derbyshire, who is one of the greatest political writers and thinkers alive (except for Derb’s unfortunate lack of belief).
Hw is right.
The post WW2 so-called ‘NS’ is just a larping parody of the real thing.
Such an insightful excellent article Brad!
Those anti christian morons just don’t get it: whites shall reduce jew influence & ultimately defeat them by worshiping jews harder than did the Poles a few centuries ago, when they literally paid entrance fees (to jews) for admittance into christian churches for the privilege of bowing down before their imaginary friend, the jew on the stick, who “CHRISTIAN NATIONALISTS” call “based rabbi yeshu”
Court Jews prove just how incredibly potent christianity was as a way for whites to truly fend off the jew menace. Court Jews were exempt from the christian ban on usury (which only applied to christians & never forbade jews from targeting christians)
Just ditch all the pretenses Hunter. It’d be better for everyone if you’d just stop pretending to be a racialist or even “racially aware” & dedicated to white survival. The less stupid & less delusional among here see your true colors (or what you’ve “evolved” into as you may see it) & you’d probably feel better just being a christ-cuck without any racial concerns (other than of course preSERVING the jews).
My argument is that we will never get anywhere with these people.
They are weird, antisocial malcontents and cranks who are not trying to accomplish anything. They reject the very idea of engaging in political activity to accomplish any type of goal. They are nothing but an albatross for anyone who is a race realist, racially aware or dedicated to White survival because they repulse the people who we need on our side.
White Christian Nationalism is useful in all sorts of ways. These people are deeply anti-Christian and react like a Hollywood vampire does to holy water. We DO NOT want the public to associate them with us. It turns them off. These attacks are helpful in the sense of creating distance between our brand and people like the Satanist wignat who killed his parents and wanted to assassinate Trump.
White Christian Nationalism is for those who find Odin to be odious.
White Christian Nationalists find Odin to be odious.
https://rumble.com/v70197w-warstrike-episode-115-discussion-of-part-i-of-werner-sombarts-the-jews-and-.html
https://archive.org/details/WernerSombartAndOswaldSpenglerGermanSocialismVsMarxismWithDrAlexanderJacob
Interesting topic that prompted me to read this.
https://archive.org/details/sombart-werner-why-is-there-no-socialism-in-the-united-states-1906-1976_202408
Even the Chinese are wondering what’s behind it.
https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2022%20Issue9/Version-5/B2209051214.pdf
I strongly suspect that the Austrian school of economics was able to prevail over the “Prussian” school for purely ideological reasons due to its abrupt end after World War II. In contrast to the Prussian school, the Austrian school was teeming with Jews, most of whom emigrated to America and continue to determine its economic fortunes to this day (e.g., 33 trillion in national debt).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_school_of_economics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodenstreit
Seen in this light, it is hardly surprising that decidedly Jewish organizations such as the “Mises Institute” regularly denounce National Socialism as a “left-wing ideology” (see also the loony concoction “Big Lie” by the “libertarian” Hindu D’Souza), which is then picked up by crackpots like Brandon Martinez to spread cheap Jewish propaganda lies.
It can be roughly summarized that what the self-proclaimed communists refer to as “capitalism” is in reality plundering by rootless Jews (or their unprincipled imitators) through speculation, usury, compound interest. However, since communism itself is a brainchild of Jewry, it is forbidden to mention the Jew by name, thus it remains ineffective.
This dream turned into a nightmare.
https://i.ibb.co/Qj7g6b4x/ns.webp
First, one has to ask what “capitalism” (from the outset a fraudulent communist battle cry used to defame the free market economy) actually is. To this day, the uneducated general public mistakenly believes that the degree of capitalism can virtually be gauged by the height and number of skyscrapers.
According to this view, the USA must therefore be super-capitalist, a myth that persists to this day, even though America’s position in the “Index of Economic Freedom” has now slipped to 26th place, with even former Eastern Bloc countries such as the Baltic states and Czechia now being more “capitalist.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom
https://www.heritage.org/index/pages/report
The word “capitalism” still has a much stronger appeal in America than in Europe, even among people who will never be wealthy. This is what fuels the American dream until it bursts like a soap bubble. Millionaires know that true wealth is inherited and only very rarely generated by oneself.
America has twice as many millionaires as Germany, but only half as many as Switzerland. Ultimately, this does not benefit the general population, because these are not producers, but consumers. Income inequality in America is as great as in Russia or China, and those are threshold countries.
Better to have 1,000 residents with $1000 in assets than one with a million (not to mention billionaires). Not only the $37 trillion in debt (three times as much per capita as Germany), but also the lack of a welfare state are indicators of a weak economy that cannot afford social spending.
In recent weeks, I’ve been able to lead my church in prayers of thanksgiving for things—the designation of Antifa as a terrorist organization, the raising of the fee for an H-1B to $100,000, and the announcement that the FBI will no longer cooperate with the SPLC or the ADL—that I wouldn’t have even been able to casually voice my support for a decade ago. And my Cavaliers are 5-1. What planet am I on?!
This is an American debate where religion still matters. Aside from SA, I can’t see where else this is still some kind of an issue. It just seems to pointless and archaic and boring. As to NS types, they’re unserious actors. It’s one thing to think that NS Germany is the closest thing we’ve had to a racial state or a place that approximates an ideal place and time that comes closest to a what we’d like to see (the confederacy comes close and 70s SA or Jim Crow South). But NS will always fascinate because they had a lot going for them: cool uniforms, tasteful art, open Judeo-criticism, a powerful military, occult symbolism, Wagnerian atmospherics, a community bond, etc. etc. etc. Do you blame them?
@Friedrich Braun,
“But NS will always fascinate because they had a lot going for them: cool uniforms, tasteful art, open Judeo-criticism, a powerful military, occult symbolism, Wagnerian atmospherics, a community bond, etc. etc. etc. Do you blame them?”
Actually it was distasteful and ugly. The Nazis literally attempted to take over every single cultural symbol, association, and institutions and Nazify it. That doesn’t take brains. It take perversion. Take a cross and put a Nazi swastika in the center. COOL! YA? Grab some Rennasance re enacters, have them wear Armor with Swastikas on it marching down a street with blonde maidens marching in sqaure carrying aloft a green sprig and ivy canopy strung together by a giant Swastika Flag. GOOD! NO?
It was all backed by violent street thuggery, assassination, and institutional support from oligarchs hoping to influence the Weimar Republic for their own ends. This wasn’t a esthetically pleasing, it gangsterism and blasphemy as Churchill said. He was right.
https://counter-currents.com/2025/10/counter-currents-radio-podcast-no-657/
https://odysee.com/@gregoryconte:2/Leftists-Must-Confront-Jewish-Power-and-Accept-Hitler:5
Their first goal’s to break Juden-power
through joint effort of will. I’m curious
how they intend to accomplish this. In
the minutes that I listened, it was not
clear what their opposition consists of.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-is-the-content-of-wilhelm-Yi0_FSGoRsuKJMJZWcFO0w
via https://counter-currents.com/author/clarissa-schnabel/
https://libgen.gl/ads.php?md5=be794f5a4022f3f6833149d913f9baa3
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Bang
https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Franz_Schr%C3%B6nghamer-Heimdal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Wahrmund
https://archive.org/details/meister-wilhelm-judas-schuldbuch-eine-deutsche-abrechnung-4.-auflage-1919-181-s.-scan-fraktur
https://archive.org/details/DasGesetzDesNomadentumsUndDieHeutigeJudenherrschaft
“ The next step is to build momentum and move from anti-anti-Whiteism to explicit pro-White politics.”
Will never happen with those who worship a dead jew as f heir god and will destroy the several Republic’s built by European “white” men!!
They will followed their jew man-god into totalitarian tyrannical global monarchism!
They have forsaken their blood ancestors for a foreign alien peoples claim of godhood…
They do not belong here … and frankly all who claim him as their lord god and and his global monarchy in these here Republic’s of my ENGLISH ancestors aa WE ARE each and all SOVEREIGN and NO F-ing Jew dead ir alive is SOVEREIGN in these here Republics styled the united States i America!!
Suck on it you treaaonous f-ing cucks!!
https://archive.org/details/nationalconstitutionalismarchive/mode/1up?
We need a Final Solution to the Crank Question
Difficult days have long since dawned for the tireless administrators and servants of the almighty Jewish system of lies, which seeks to enslave us, incapacitate us, and abuse and degrade us as race-less consumers. Ultimately, this is a flawed but no less effective program for the extermination of the white humanoid species and its most advanced civilization ever developed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9DDBMookVY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNj3FVto9Uo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alec_Ryrie
Not an hour goes by without them trying to patch up and whitewash the increasingly obvious cracks in their crumbling, malicious facade narrative, their (supposedly only) version of the “truth.” They talk about “democracy” [sic], but impose a gag order on others, an inviolable taboo. They defame critical questioning of the relationship between numbers alone and the insistence on irrefutable evidence as “denial.”
How is the internal hollowing out and destruction of our world directly and indirectly related to this? They did not save the white race, because white people have no right to self-determination. “It’s okay to be white” or “white lives matter” are racist discriminations. They “liberated” the entire world (with bombs on white civilians) from Hitler (they even perversely named their bombers “Liberator”).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWiIt62PB8w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNds1hxpjXc
http://www.g2mil.com/
They seriously compare their cheap propagandistic kitsch from Jewish Hollywood cinema with a thousand-year-old Western culture (which they themselves destroyed, not only with bombers). And they seriously prescribe to us all what this “means” and is supposed to “signify,” thus also taking over the interpretation and explanation of the world instead of their brainwashed, indoctrinated “consumers.”
Orwell was right; he foresaw this type of “tyrant” (Ryrie) with brilliant intuition. They twist everything and persecute the search for truth as a crime. This is essentially the “original version” of the poem (also “enriched” by Ryrie in a deliberately manipulative manner), authorized by Niemöller himself, according to the Martin Niemöller Foundation:
When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent; I was not a communist.
When they imprisoned the social democrats,
I remained silent; I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,
I remained silent; I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for me,
there was no one left to protest.
There were no Jews in it, not even Catholics! In an interview in the 1970s, Niemöller added that this poem never existed in poetic form, but that the content of one of his sermons was later written as a poem by others, of which, miraculously, “countless versions exist” today.
The account in “Bolschevikipedia” is therefore clearly a forgery and distortion (as we know from the “Big Lie”) by Jewish liars from American “Holcaust” organizations. Of course, Ryrie also conceals this: “Niemöller was initially an anti-Communist, anti-Semite, and supported Adolf Hitler.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_They_Came
Ryrie contrasts the supposedly most morally evil person (not Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot, but) Hitler with the “Jewish” Jesus as the most morally good person, as if they had been there in person 2,000 years ago.
So anyone who does not recognize Hitler as Satan is himself a godless servant of Satan. Not a word about who destroyed this good named Jesus: the Jews, who hated the good, the true, and the beautiful then as they do today and will continue to do so in the future, because they are the rootless counter-race to humanity.
The brain-dead “Protestant historian” himself cements the schizophrenic myth he laments: “If you deny the Holocaust, you’re an intolerable monster. And when you bleat about cancel culture, only other monsters will care. And rightly so, because to deny the Holocaust is to reject the deepest moral truth on which our society is built.”
https://rumble.com/c/ScriptureandTraditionFrJM
In other words, they demonize, stigmatize, and dehumanize individuals who question their narrative. Human beings are “monsters” because they have the wrong idea, come to different conclusions, and dare to claim their right to seek the truth. This is mental castration, incapacitation, prescribed rumination, supervised parroting. But above all, it is anything but “Christian”!
Imagine if the Jewish system of lies collapsed like a house of cards at the moment when a young girl, thanks to her now protected femininity, manages to confront it. The Jewish false moralists (“Pharisees”) and self-appointed “guardians of truth” are seething with rage! But the system has learned from this foray of truth into the center of the lie machine: Never again should anyone succeed in making themselves heard like this! Click selected video:
https://archive.org/details/Evalion_files/EvalionOnGlobalNews-8akpteckj7i.webm
Watch here (enter “Quisling” in the
search field). First click “CC”, select
“English”, then subs-selection opens.
https://ymovies.top/upmovies/
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2025/10/15/a-commentary-on-the-film-quisling-the-final-days/
A key scene in the film right at the beginning: Quisling’s future lawyer is sitting at home, surrounded by his family, and wants to listen to a radio announcement about his future client. His wife (standing upright) turns off the radio right in front of him and says, “I’m tired of hearing this!” Who is the boss here? Clearly she!
Is this historically accurate, or a modern feminist distortion? The underlying principle is: “He who loves his wife obeys her/submits to her!” Exactly the opposite: “He who loves his wife rebukes her!” Back then, this lady would have immediately received a hefty slap in the face for giving the father of the family any “orders.”
Some progress when considering the this “Quisling” production: After a certain amount of time, the Norwegian language becomes a mild imposition on West Germanic (German, Dutch, English) ears. I am now about halfway through the film. My assessment so far, filtered through my German perspective comes here. If I were in Quisling’s place, I would have responded to the weak pastor/defender in prison as follows:
“Love is a word that has been corrupted by Jewish influence. You can love your people and your children, but the Jews, Negroes, perverts, and communists demand that you love them. I consider duty more important than love. Love is a sentimental mood, but duty is a commitment that must be upheld. Those who rely on love are abandoned. Love is affection; it blossoms and fades, often cyclically. But duty is a constant state.
Duty is stronger. You have a senile parent who absorbs all your energy because of the intensity of care they require. It is difficult for you to remember this person, to whom you “owe” your life, as the loving parent. But they now depend on your duty, because they cost you more energy than you cost them. Duty means knowing that we have a task to fulfill, to accomplish, in the cycle of life and generations.
Only this statement makes sense: “I don’t always love my wife, but I am always committed to her.” Commitment means staying the course under all circumstances. It is no coincidence that today’s ‘relationships’ supposedly fail “due to a lack of love,” but in reality due to a lack of commitment. What these people understand as “love” today primarily takes place below the belt.
People who claim to “love” you are definitely worthy of your mistrust. People who feel honest responsibility and commitment toward you are worthy of your trust. Embedded in the film is the usual Jewish “character psychologization of early childhood influences.” I hear the counterargument: “Many murderers have invoked commitment!”
So say the Jews and their lies! Just as many have invoked alleged “love,” even in murder. Do we love out of duty, or are we obligated out of love? Love endlessly, we see that: millions of beneficiaries who abuse us, we take into our warm soft beds out of (alleged, i.e., hypocritical) “love.” Where is our duty to ourselves?
It’s about duty and commitment. Why is that so important? Because we have to be true to ourselves as a reliable authority. Otherwise, we lose our stability, our center, our footing. When others stand us up but we show up, it may be annoying, but unreliable people are like leaves in the wind; it is advisable to underestimate their importance. Whatever “comes up”: if you give your word, you are there!
This American band was more suc-
cessful in Germany than in America.
The “American” had a Latino lover.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Promise_You_Made