Nick Fuentes Goes Full Neocon Imperialist

January 13, 2026 Hunter Wallace Conservatism, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, MAGA, MIGA, Neocons, Politics, Populists, Progressives, World 12

If I was a Democrat, I would be cheering on Nick Fuentes.

The Democrats already plan to push for DC and Puerto Rican statehood when the pendulum swings back and they return to power in Washington. They would pick up four Senate seats.

Imagine what the world would be like if these retards got their way and Trump conquered Venezuela, Greenland, Cuba and Canada and forced these countries to become part of the United States. Greenland would be worth two more Democratic senators, Cuba and Venezuela would send four Democratic senators to Congress, Canada would produce at least 10 more Democratic senators.

Assuming the United States remains the same, the demise of the Voting Rights Act and the 2030 Census should shift power in the House and the Electoral College toward Republicans. How would the House be reapportioned though in a scenario in which Venezuela, Cuba, Greenland, Canada, DC and Puerto Rico have become states? How would this shift the balance of power in the Electoral College? Do we want all of Canada, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Cuba and potentially Mexico voting in our elections?

What sense does it make to celebrate the ICE shooting of Renee Good? The only thing that accomplishes is to poison public opinion against ICE and immigration enforcement. The next Democratic president will “defund ICE” and usher in millions of more illegal aliens to overwhelm and flip Texas.

Trump, Fuentes and MAGA are on a power trip and don’t see how it could backfire and end badly for them. They are consumed by imperialist hubris.

12 Comments

  1. Warren Balogh and Striker have noted that Nick suddenly started appearing everywhere around August, right around the time the Venezuelan op was being planned out. Google Trends seem to support this. “The Most Censored Man in America” is completely dominating the algorithm on YouTube and TikTok. The whole thing reeks of Bannon.

    When it’s all said and done though, Little Nicky will be tossed aside, possibly have his finances come under scrutiny from a future Dem government.

    Reply

  2. Crazy times.

    Technically, Nick isn’t incorrect. He’s a fed too(who isn’t nowadays) But a sick man cannot project health. A diseased nation can only spread sickness. America First was supposed to improve conditions at hone before attempting to project power abroad. I guess that plan’s out the window. Lol! This is a suicidal regine committed to gambling everything with a losing hand and potentially taking us all down with them. The Kirk thing didn’t work. If it hadn’t been handled so poorly and clumsily it would have led to some level of social cohesion with Erika Kirk serving as some kind of “high priestess”/ moral cudgel to get the proles in line. But it failed. Miserably. What’s next? Civil war 2.0? A false flag nuke in Kiev? Trannies infiltrated bu fed kidnapping and murdering children like moslems did in Beslan?

    On the senseless killing of Renee Good…pure insanity. What threat do two goofy looking women pose to any man with common sense. Yes, they shouldn’t have been there…but honestly can that retard seriously believe his life was in danger? Things have to looked at non-autistically. Just because you can do something legally doesn’t mean you should do it. I bet his workmates are all asking themselves “What the f*** is wrong with Jonathan?” Stupid idiot ruined his life for nothing.

    Reply

  3. Imagine my complete gobsmacked shock and amazement, if you possibly can. Perhaps he can now join Lady G’s senatorial staff, with a special chair funded by Paul Singer – another real “traditionalist”. Clown World on full display.

    Reply

  4. A Christian Nationalist supporting Golden Circle 2.0 in the spirit of antebellum Democrats was an (un)surprising development. History tends to rhyme.

    Reply

  6. I want maximum wealth, power, territory, and security for the American people. The real question is, HOW do we obtain these things?

    The traditional American answer, the correct answer, is nationalism, NOT imperialism.

    Colonialism, NOT imperialism.

    George Washington, NOT Julius Cesar.

    In 1759, Benjamin Franklin was AGAINST annexing Guadeloupe for a good reason.

    In 1798, the British offered John Adams territories in the West Indies and the East Indies if America would join them in a full scale war against France, Spain and the Netherlands. Alexander Hamilton wanted to accept this offer, but Adams wisely refused. Instead, Adams waged a limited war against France to obtain a strictly limited objective, freedom of the seas for the American merchant marine.

    Liberia could have been founded as an overseas territory of the USA, just as Sierra Leone was founded as an overseas territory of Great Britain. Instead, the American Colonization Society wisely decided to found Liberia to be an independent country.

    In 1848, there was a movement to annex all Mexico. James K. Polk wisely refused.

    The early Republicans wisely opposed the filibusterer schemes to annex Cuba and Nicaragua.

    During Grant’s presidency, patriots wisely thwarted a scheme to annex the Dominican Republic.

    Grover Cleveland wisely refused to go to war against Spain.

    William Jennings Bryan wisely campaigned for Philippine independence.

    Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge wisely rejected the interventionist legacy of Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Harding and Coolidge didn’t pull out of Latin America, but unlike Roosevelt and Wilson, Harding and Coolidge at least didn’t initiate any NEW interventions.

    In 1956 Eisenhower wisely refused to support the British/French/Israeli scheme to seize the Suez Canal. Even at the height of the Cold War, Eisenhower preferred to allow a Soviet client state to nationalize the most valuable, the most strategic property in the world, rather than risk getting dragged into the Middle East quagmire.

    All of these wise decisions played an important role in America’s growth from a string tenuous colonies on the Atlantic seaboard to a global superpower.

    A sprawling multi-ethnic American empire might not have survived the French Revolution or the Civil War; it might not have won World War 2 or the Cold War.

    America’s common race, language, religion, political traditions, and economic conditions gave us an underlying organic cultural union which healed the wounds of the Revolution and the Civil War, so that a united nation could gradually grow into the world’s largest economy. Our lack of overseas ambitions enabled us to lead the whole world during the World Wars and the Cold War, by allaying the fears and jealousies of our partners

    To the extent that America indulged in imperialism, it has been a source of weakness, not strength. The Philippines were a strategic Achilles Heel during World War 2. Puerto Ricans vote overwhelmingly Democratic. The anomalous constitutional status of the Virgin Islands made them the ideal headquarters for Jeffrey Epstein’s blackmail operation. In 2016, the establishment Republicans could have used the delegates from Commonwealth territories at the Republican national convention to block the nomination of Donald Trump. If, God forbid, the Commonwealth territories ever became states, the Democrats would have permanent unassailable super-majorities in the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Electoral College. We, the intellectual vanguard of the American Dissident Right, might all end our lives in solitary confinement in the dungeons of Guantanamo Bay.

    To the extent that the territorial expansion of the American nation is truly desirable, it could ironically best be achieved by REJECTING multi-ethnic imperialism. It is necessary to exalt the moral standing of the nationalist ideal, for both humanitarian reasons and also for reasons of cold self interest.

    Nationalism is necessary for us to recolonize our own homeland via the re-migration of the unassimilable post-1965 immigrants. It would be a great help if Venezuela, not the USA, became the primary magnet for the rootless economic migrants of this hemisphere. For this reason alone, we never should have imposed economic sanctions on Venezuela.

    Furthermore, the nationalist idea can cause the breakup of the artificial multi-ethnic construct known as “Canada”. If Quebec manages to liberate itself and assume its proper stature among the independent nations of the world, America can then annex the only truly desirable foreign territories, mainland North America west of the Ottawa River. Nova Scotia could be an Anglo-Canadian rump state for those who reject being part of the American nation.

    If Greenland was a fully independent and fabulously prosperous Eskimo ethno-state, it would be a magnet for the other Arctic islands. This would impose further pressure for the breakup of “Canada”. If Greenland really does have the world’s greatest mineral resources, it might be best for Americans if the Greenlanders themselves monopolized the profits.

    Only American ideals and American methods can make America great again. It should be obvious to every patriotic adult American man that Thomas Massie is right about foreign policy, and Jeff Sessions (and his protege Stephen Miller) is right about immigration. That is where we should plant our standard, and never retreat a single inch for any reason whatsoever.

    If, in his heart of hearts, Hispano-Italian Nick Fuentes is a Roman, not an American, then he should literally move to the city of Rome in Italy and try to make Rome great again. Benjamin Franklin’s nation is not Julius Cesar’s nation. We are part of the same family of nations, and we can respect the good qualities of the Romans, but Americans are frankly better than the Romans and I’m tired of pretending we’re not.

    And if Nick is reverting back into the adolescent Neocon that he was in 2015, then he needs to finally grow up and become an adult man with stable principles.

    Reply

  7. Your take on the impact of new states on the voting landscape is spot on. When all the 51st state stuff started my sister called me in a panic (she has severe TDS) and I told her that it was bluster as they have always stopped PR and DC to be states for the same problems that adding Canada would cause, and even if Trump wasn’t smart enough to figure that out, his donors and party members would. However, you have the insanity of him saying it many times, saying he wants all of it a state, and at the same time in 2025 he also repeated the long worn line that he didnt want PR and DC as states, so in what kind of world does it make any sense to turn those down but add, electorally, another California to your election problems as a GOP’er? Then throw in the other areas, Cuba etc. and while would have a far less impact on the House, the Senate would be a disaster, and in elections where each electoral vote count, that could be an issue if the swing states don;t go his way. It always seemed to be an unforced error on his part, at least offer Territory status first, he was a Democrat a lot more of his life than a GOP’er, maybe he’s reverting to the mean.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to PS Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*