Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s Boat Message: Fuck America, Praise Allah

Massachusetts

The Boston Marathon bombing was a straight up act of jihad:

Note: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev became a U.S. citizen on September 11, 2012 which was the same day as the Benghazi terrorist attack in Libya.

“(CBS) — Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev left a note claiming responsibility for the April attack, describing it as retribution for U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, reports CBS News senior correspondent John Miller.

“The message was handwritten on the interior wall of the boat where he hid from authorities, bleeding from gunshot wounds, several days following the attack, sources told CBS.

In the note, Tsarnaev described the bombing victims as “collateral damage,” CBS reports. “When you attack one Muslim, you attack all Muslims,” Tsarnaev wrote. He described his brother Tamerlan, who died in a shootout with police, as a martyr. …”

Update: I didn’t catch this earlier.

“As police searched for him, and as he lay bleeding in his boat hideout, Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev wrote “F*** America” on the side panel of the boat, police in Massachusetts told ABC News.

Officers said they also discovered the phrase “Praise Allah” on the boat’s side panels and several anti-American screeds, including references to Iraq, Afghanistan and “the infidels.”

About Hunter Wallace 11768 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

14 Comments

  1. Denise
    “Test – I was being wildly sarcastic.”

    Yes, i wasn’t clear. My point was simply i can’t see a good reason for the Boston bombing to be a false flag and secondly that the bombers themselves seem like archetypal TMB so to me if there is some dark involved it’s more likely to be related to their uncle and CIA/Mossad using Chechens for dark stuff in Russia.

    Given how nasty some of the Chechen nationalist / jihadist terror attacks in Russia have been if there was any USG involvement i can see why they’d be desperate for no-one to follow the links.

  2. Lew, by direct action, I was talking about armed violence, not political or mass media actions. As to what I was referring to by what and it, check my earlier comments on this thread.

  3. I have done that. It’s possible I’m misreading you or that we are talking past each other a bit.

    Since you’re a new contributor, I am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt and an opportunity to clarify your comments on the Jews before writing you off as a liar. Whites in general are not at fault for Jewish attacks on white culture and the white gene pool. That is a malicious idea, and you are promoting it in an unqualified way, while, it should be noted, slamming Denise who is almost generally right on substance if not style.

    Quite frankly, your responses that I have seen on the Jewish issue are insubstantial, vague, unclear and poorly reasoned.

  4. Why are whites not responsible for their own beliefs? Whites were complicit in the systematic dismantling of Western Civilization. Why is someone not responsible for adopting bad ideas? Why are those with more sound ideas not responsible for being shouted down? Why in God’s Holy Name would you be a part of the furthering of dilution of personal responsibility and accountability that is near the sine qua non of Western collapse, Lew? Why are you constantly saying “it’s not us, it’s them.”

  5. Lmao. Putting words in my mouth in your very first response? Step up your game, Occigent. Start by quoting something I actually wrote and tell us why it’s wrong. I’ll check back later.

  6. What do Jews say? “It’s them.”

    What do those who are the seed of Western Civilization say? “It’s us.”

  7. Sorry Lew. I misread your post.

    “Whites in general are not at fault for Jewish attacks on white culture and the white gene pool. That is a malicious idea…”.

    No, whites are not at fault for what Jews do. But whites are at fault when Jews succeed. It’s a fine line. It’s called contributory negligence.

    I generally enjoy your comments Lew.

  8. French intellectual kills himself in Notre Dame Cathedral to raise consciousness about Muslim immigration destroying Europe.


    I am healthy in body and mind, and I am filled with love for my wife and children. I love life and expect nothing beyond, if not the perpetuation of my race and my mind. However, in the evening of my life, facing immense dangers to my French and European homeland, I feel the duty to act as long as I still have strength. I believe it necessary to sacrifice myself to break the lethargy that plagues us. I give up what life remains to me in order to protest and to found. I chose a highly symbolic place, the Cathedral of Notre Dame de Paris, which I respect and admire: she was built by the genius of my ancestors on the site of cults still more ancient, recalling our immemorial origins.

    While many men are slaves of their lives, my gesture embodies an ethic of will. I give myself over to death to awaken slumbering consciences. I rebel against fate. I protest against poisons of the soul and the desires of invasive individuals to destroy the anchors of our identity, including the family, the intimate basis of our multi-millennial civilization. While I defend the identity of all peoples in their homes, I also rebel against the crime of the replacement of our people.

    The dominant discourse cannot leave behind its toxic ambiguities, and Europeans must bear the consequences. Lacking an identitarian religion to moor us, we share a common memory going back to Homer, a repository of all the values ??on which our future rebirth will be founded once we break with the metaphysics of the unlimited, the baleful source of all modern excesses.

    I apologize in advance to anyone who will suffer due to my death, first and foremost to my wife, my children, and my grandchildren, as well as my friends and followers. But once the pain and shock fade, I do not doubt that they will understand the meaning of my gesture and transcend their sorrow with pride. I hope that they shall endure together. They will find in my recent writings intimations and explanations of my actions.

    http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/05/the-reasons-for-a-voluntary-death/

  9. Lew, what Occigent said at 3:47 PM is my position. Whites are not responsible for what the Jews do, but if we aid and abed them by our actions, we are responsible for that.

    For example, take the porn industry. Who owns and runs it? People of Jewish descent. Who buys their products? Our people do. That’s why pornography has become a multi-billion dollar business. If porn had to depend only on Jewish customers for business, it would be a minor mom and pop affair, not the behemoth it is today. Sadly, too many of our fellow white Americans want this filth, and their lusts feed the beast.

    Lew, if I “slam” Denise, it’s for these reasons. One, she thinks everything is the fault of the “Jooos”. Hunter and Jack have written many posts explaining why this is a fallacy. I agree with H&J because my own reading of Jewish and Christian sources prove them to be right on this issue. Two, she has a tendency to grasp for elaborate explanations for events, when the simple truth is right in front of her. Her claiming Boston was a false flag psyop shows a total lack of comprehension. It was clear to anyone who looked at all the facts that it was done by a couple of Muzzie losers. But she is so desperate to make an event conform to what she wants to believe, she will not consider the obvious. For example, she posted a link to a video in which she claimed Tamerlan was taken alive by the cops. That video was so fuzzy I couldn’t make out any details, except the nakedness of the man. Then you read how Tamerlan was shot at by the police and dragged by his brother’s car. The pictures of his corpse show injuries that conforms to being shot and dragged. Guess which scenario sounds more realistic? Three, her arrogant attitude toward everyone who doesn’t conform to her “it’s the Joooos” worldview is a big turnoff. I’m quite willing to blame the Jews when there’s proof they have done something, but I won’t automatically blame them for it when there’s no proof. That sort of idiocy plays right into the hands of our enemies, who can honesty say, this person is a blind bigot. Hunter&Jack thankfully are not arrogant, and they try to reason with people who disagree with them, instead of sundowning them.

  10. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev had a problem, a boy in tights, a serial rapist, a bomber that murdered people. To put it in terms, a weirdo

  11. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has a problem, a man in tights, a serial rapist, a bomber that killed people. weirdo

Comments are closed.