By Hunter Wallace
If you haven’t already seen it, David and Nancy French are having a meltdown – or, shall we say, a “cuckdown” – at National Review and The Washington Post over being ridiculed so harshly by the Alt Right on Twitter.
Matt Parrott thinks we should steer clear of the French family drama:
“It’s not about moderation, but about direction. We should not bother being politically correct. People have had it with political correctness. We should not hold back in naming and blaming Jewish Power. We should not sweep the problem of Black-on-White crime under the rug. We should be bold and direct, and always on the offensive. But to actively attack a blended family, making a young child the target of political vitriol, …that’s just offensive.”
I think Matt is shooting from the hip here.
If the French family had been earnestly trying to avoid the public eye, I would probably agree that they were being picked on, but that is clearly not the case here. After doing some digging around the internet, it quickly became evident that there are few things that David and Nancy French seem to enjoy more than virtue-signaling about their very own Baby O.J. See here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.
In David French’s own words:
“And we include her in almost everything we do. We’ve taken her with us to CPAC, she’s met Mitt Romney, she’s been to my wife’s book-signings with Bristol Palin, and she was right up there with us on stage when I was honored to receive the American Conservative Union’s Ronald Reagan Award.
The response? Love and acceptance. In fact, within the conservative movement, we’re not unusual at all. Interracial adoption is so common within the Evangelical community, it’s triggered a bizarre backlash from the Left. In my own (quite conservative) church, adoption has transformed a historically-white congregation into a veritable rainbow coalition.”
In another article, Nancy French points to this Op-Ed in the New York Times on how transracial adoption has become fashionable among evangelical Christians:
“If you attend an evangelical church these days, there’s a good chance you’ll hear about the “orphan crisis” affecting millions of children around the world.
These Christian advocates of transnational adoption will often say that some 150 million children need homes — though that figure, derived from a Unicef report, includes not only parentless children, but also those who have lost only one parent, and orphans who live with relatives.
Evangelical adoptions picked up in earnest in the middle of the last decade, when a wave of prominent Christians, including the megachurch pastor Rick Warren and leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention, began to promote adoption as a special imperative for believers. Adoption mirrored the Christian salvation experience, they argued, likening the adoption of orphans to Christ’s adoption of the faithful. Adoption also embodied a more holistic “pro-life” message — caring for children outside the womb as well as within — and an emphasis on good deeds, not just belief, that some evangelicals felt had been ceded to mainline Protestant denominations. …”
As Vox Day points out, the criticism stings because it is true.
The fact is, it really is fashionable within the conservative movement to adopt black children – see Matt Bevin, Tim Huelskamp, Hayley and Mike Jones – so common that David French boasts about how it has transformed his own Tennessee church. There really are tons of cuckservatives virtue-signaling to each other, to the Left, and, in their minds, down to us over how great and Christian they are for cucking their own families by adopting African children. Nancy French even dressed her daughter up in an “I Only Cry When Democrats Hold Me” shirt and paraded her around CPAC.
This only sounds bizarre to us because we are not evangelicals who are told every Sunday that Gawd or Jesus wants us to adopt a black orphan. Otherwise, it is not all that different from what Russell Moore is telling the Southern Baptists. From the outside, cuckoldry, Jew-worship, and faux and effeminate moralizing are defining characteristics of the evangelicalism of the last 20 years.
Note: Jared Taylor has chimed in.
” so common that David French boasts about how it has transformed his own Tennessee church.”
Can we do some research to find the contact information of this Tennessee church.
This is one area where we should work with groups like the Black Nation of Islam. NOI strongly opposes Whites taking Black children, stealing them from the Black community and positioning themselves as holier than tho. Lots of idiot White Christians were accused of stealing Haitian children who did have parents and trying to take them to Oregon.
This is yet another sign that it seems the only place where the Christian religion current is on the side of White Indo European peoples is in Eastern Europe.
Here in the dis United States it seems the Judeo X’tians all what to be like Hollywood Leftist Lib like Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolene!
Where’s the Charles Manson family when we really need them?
A blended family? One second he talks about being tough, bold, direct, on the offensive and not bound by political correctness. The next second he’s chastising others for not walking on eggshells, because there’s a “blended family” that might get its feelings hurt. It appears that he thinks he’s a public relations guru. He clearly underestimates the threshold and comprehension level of his supposed target audience. Pro-White people and those disposed to be persuaded by pro-White people understand the nuances at play here. Political correctness is political correctness. Say what you have to say and say it without trying to convince yourself that your intended audience is dumber than you are.
Seriously, what was he smoking that made him think vitriol was really directed at the child? It’s clearly been directed at those using that child as a pawn and a buffer to stave off any ridicule or resentment. There’s going to be overlap in vitriol, just like any other case where children are used as human shields and status symbols.
Personally, I’d place that child with a black family—in Africa. I’d then put the French family in a mental institution. Or they could go live in Africa to spread their affliction on that continent. I’m a nice enough guy where I would at least give them that option.
I used to wonder if Connie Chastain had black children or something.
“Adopting African trophy babies is what addle-headed movie stars do. Madonna has a little African. So does Charlize Theron. Angelina Jolie, Sandra Bullock, Jane Fonda, Michelle Pfeiffer, and Nicole Kidman are all raising black children.”
He forgot Angelina Jolie.
Don’t forget Bruno and Baby O.J.
Evangelical leaders promote this because they want to signal to the dominant secular culture that they are “hip” and “mainstream” too. It is like the mainline Protestant churches embracing gay marriage.
Hence the quip, “gay marriage has been a fundamental principle of conservatism for two months now.”
Jared Taylor: ‘How can anyone who is not deliberately blind write as if race were irrelevant? How can Mr. French fail to see that his culture sprang from one race and that others reject it as alien? Africans have been in America for 400 years, yet wherever Africans gather together the culture Mr. French claims to defend is almost nowhere to be seen. Does he really think his little Ethiopian will embrace and strengthen what millions before her have despised?
Look around the world. Wherever you find whites you find a common culture. Wherever you find non-whites you find something different. It is their special talent for failing to see that that makes “conservatives” cuckservatives.’
How much you want to bet that Blind Side Oher voted for Obama and thinks the NRA is full of creepy ass crackers?
I assume David and Nancy French forgo any kind of chores for their trophy child. If not, just think about the negative connotations of self-righteous White people paying someone else to have an African do a little forced labor around their house.
Call me crazy, but something tells me there might be a pathological predisposition for slave owners in the French family tree.
Added an update to my post in light of your research. Muh bad.
Trump started something which keeps on proving just how worthless the “conservative movement” is, especially to anyone seriously concerned about a future with White children in it.
Culture is largely the social expression of a population’s genetics.
They made their church diverse the only way they knew how – by kidnapping children.
These vultures descended on Rwanda after the 1994 genocide, hoping to scoop up a crop of orphans. The Rwandan government sent them packing and placed the orphans where they belonged, with their closest surviving relatives.
There ain’t no Cucks here,
We give no fucks here,
On the Alt Right!
(Chant to Under The Sea from Disney!)
“Evangelical adoptions picked up in earnest in the middle of the last decade, when a wave of prominent Christians, including the megachurch pastor Rick Warren and leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention, began to promote adoption as a special imperative for believers.”
I guess I’m not the first one to point out a pattern here. Southern Baptism emerged as a sect in favor of Negro slavery, didn’t it? Isn’t that how it broke away from what became Northern Baptism? That’s my rough sense of it.
Similarly, we have the Germans now inviting non-Aryans into Europe, and we had the (effectively) Southern General George Patton trying to show he could damage racist Germany more thoroughly than anyone else could.
Talk about wanting to be liked. They all are, or were, trying to show themselves devotees of the liberalism that crushed their ancestors.
NRO might as well stop posting and put the Bruno and Baby OJ video up instead
FTR when Ben stein went out to adopt he specifically went out of his way to adopt a white child, and was doubly pleased that the boy is blond
What can I say? With friends like jews you don’t need enemies. They’re fixing the world with tikkum olam so their master and Father Satan would approve. There is an evil deeper than all others. It is called treason. The deepest and darkest pit in Hell is the Ninth Circle reserved for traitors. There these diseased fake Christians can meet Judas and maybe he can tell them why this is wrong.
White women have always had a fetish for useless and worthless wild animals. They are even known to adopt dangerous animals and bring them home. No animal is more dangerous and insane than the wild negro. My Father told me when I was young that you can’t tame wild animals and make them into pets. These people must have really bad parents if they think they can tame a negro. What’s the point?
My comment at WP:
“What a nut job this woman is. She has a little black “token” child to show just how socially progressive she and her family are, and whines about criticism from the right… while. criticising. the. right.
Nancy, you should immediately go to a black hair salon on the nearest MLK Jr. Blvd there in Columbia TN, and get corn rows or a weave with your daughter by one of the black female hairdressers. Make sure you’re really vocal about your relationship and your politics like you have been here and elsewhere. Then come back and tell us we’re wrong, Mkay?”
“This is yet another sign that it seems the only place where the Christian religion current is on the side of White Indo European peoples is in Eastern Europe.”
In ‘Murrica the Republicans buy up the white churches, just as the Democrats buy black votes by the lot.
At this point would it be worth pointing out that Joseph was essentially a dupe who swallowed Mary’s story?
I repectfully disagree with Mr. Parrott:
This HERESY of ‘Rainbow Adoption’ is THE defining mark of the APOSTATE EVANGELICAL ‘RIGHT’- that is an offense to the Racial Purity Laws of both the BIble, and Christendom.
Here, for starters are articles that the French’s should have ‘read, marked, learned, and inwardly digested’ PRIOR to their Baboon Baby adoption.
(There are five of these articles over at Faith and Heritage)
Here also, are the prohibitions against such racial melanges from the pages of the Orthodox/Catholic Unified Past:
Prohibition of intermarriage and of sexual intercourse between Christians and Jews, Synod of Elvira, 306
(Using the ‘how much more’ pleonasm of Scripture, ‘HOW MUCH MORE should NON-WHITES not intermarry, or breed halfling/Mischling bastard children?!)
Jews and Christians not permitted to eat together, Synod of Elvira, 306
Jews not allowed to hold public office, Synod, of Clermont, 535
Jews not allowed to employ Christian servants or possess Christian slaves, 3d Synod of Orleans, 538
Jews not permitted to show themselves in the streets during Passion Week, 3d Synod of Orleans, 538
Burning of the Talmud and other books, 12th Synod of Toledo, 681
Christians not permitted to patronize Jewish doctors, Trulanic Synod, 692
Christians not permitted to live in Jewish homes, Synod of Narbonne, 1050
No, THIS IS THE “GREAT SATAN” OF THE APOSTATE WEST. And the French’s have become the focal point for their blasphemy.
This ridiculous fad of adopting pickaninnies had its 18th century counterpart. Wealthy Englishmen and women would keep little Sambos around the house as pets, sort of like organ grinders monkeys. Of course, when they grew up and became dangerous they were shipped off to Jamaica to cut sugar cane under close supervision. No more brocade coats and ice cream! French and his wife are typical middle American dipshits. The adopted the little chocolate drop to show how Oh so morally superior and un-racist they are. That is why they parade the little niglet here, there and everywhere. It is really too pathetic for words.
If we want talk about transracial adoption we can take the high ground by talking about in the abstract, why it’s a bad idea. Making attacks on an individual over his personal life isn’t productive. I think that’s what Matt was getting at.
Obviously, no one told them, “they’re so cute when they’re little.”
Hollywood made that movie the Blind Side specifically to brainwash and propagandize evangelicals and upper middle class yuppies. I remember at the time that movie being huge among evangelical circles. They bought into it hook line and sinker like they do everything. They are status whores. I have no respect for them and believe they should be attacked in the the most brutal way.
Bottom line. Their ilk have to die politically if we are to live.
The French Family are part of a trend in Christianity starting in the 1970’s when transracial adoption began to be pushed. At first it was adopting Asian kids ie Koreans/Viets then it got around to Negroes. The odd part of the equation is how popular transracial adoption is among Conservative Christians. There is that one family in Tennessee who adopted 8 Negro children. I am not sure if the South is leading in transracial adoption or not Hunter might know, but Christians get blindsided by this issue.
Even the most conservative Christian sects were involving themselves heavily in Africa, etc by the late 1960s. Hunter should do an expose on this.
using kids as status props is not something I am in favor of as a general rule.
” Making attacks on an individual over his personal life isn’t productive. I think that’s what Matt was getting at.”
Guilt is not an ABSTRACT quality. It ALWAYS has a referrent.
In short, MEN make SINS, and must suffer the penalty for those sins. Romans 1, Brady.
So, when Mr. French (and his ‘Family Affair’) had the STUPIDITY to write a COLUMN for PUBLIC CONSUMPTION denouncing the very thing he IS, (CUCK) and held up (literally) his ‘Monkey Child’ for all the world to see, as IF THIS WAS A MORALLY RIGHTEOUS ACT OF HIS own making, he transgressed the line re: Personal vs. ideological battles.
Herein is where I draw the line. When a person is merely stupid, one has to be gracious, and shake the head. But when UTTER STUPIDITY, or MORAL COMPLICITY IN SIN is made (or lauded as) a PUBLIC VIRTUE, then ‘judgment must begin at the house of God.’ French’s PRESUMPTION that he is a ‘Christian’ is the most egregious of his failings. But to hold up a spawn of a different, godless race as if it were a Covenant Seed infant!?!? [Ez. 9:2, Amos 3:2, Tobit 4:12, etc.]
“Protect yourself,” thus warns St. Ignatius in his epistle to the Smyrnans IV, “from the beasts in the form of men” (apo ton therion anthropomorphon).
As someone once noted: “Universalist theology leads inexorably to miscegenation. You can’t support one without supporting the other, no matter how hard you try.”
Or do you disagree with former Rulers of our nation?
Blacks “are inferior to the whites in the endowments of both of body and mind.” –Thomas Jefferson, 1787
“If blacks were given the right to vote, that would “place every splay-footed, bandy-shanked, hump-backed, thick-lipped, flat-nosed, woolly-headed, ebon-colored Negro in the country upon an equality with the poor white man.” –Rep. Andrew Johnson, (D., Tenn.), 1844
Blacks are “a subordinate and inferior class of beings who had been subjugated by the dominant race.”
–Chief Justice Roger Taney, Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1856
“I hold that a Negro is not and never ought to be a citizen of the United States. I hold that this government was made on the white basis; made by the white men, for the benefit of white men and their posterity forever, and should be administered by white men and none others.”
–Sen. Stephen A. Douglas (D., Ill.), 1858
Presidential nominee of the Democratic Party, 1860
“The Almighty has fixed the distinction of the races; the Almighty has made the black man inferior, and, sir, by no legislation, by no military power, can you wipe out this distinction.”
–Rep. Fernando Wood (D., N.Y.), 1865
Mayor of New York City, 1855-58, 1860-62
“Be not unequally yoked.” – St. Paul
She’s going to hate them when she is older. They took her from her home to the white man’s land, where she will not fit in with whites and be unable to return to her own people.
“Even the most conservative Christian sects were involving themselves heavily in Africa, etc by the late 1960s. Hunter should do an expose on this.”
Then start with the five article series over at Faith and Heritage:
This isn’t fundamentally much different to slavery. They are just family slaves.
The Cuckservative writes:
“We defend a culture, not a race. The foundation of that culture is a faith that makes no distinction among races but rather declares, unequivocally, “All are one, in Christ Jesus.”
I am afraid that this race denying, “the world will become one when the gospel is spread to all nations and everyone accepts Jesus Christ as their savior”, this lie was put in to Judeo Christianity at the beginning by St. Paul, the former Jewish Pharisee Saul of Tarsus.
St. Paul supposedly “saw the light” on the Road to Damascus Syria (not a good place for Christians, Whites these days) and preached the new universalist religion of Judeo Christianity to White Greeks and Jewish communities in the area. There was a lot of bad blood between the Jews and Greeks at that time, but St. Paul worked to reassure everyone that these ethnic/racial differences would no longer be an issue after everybody embraced “Jesus”.
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”
What utter nonsense! Of course there were/are differences between Greeks and Jews, men and women, free and slaves.
So in my opinion St. Paul/Pharisee Saul of Tarsus was really the first Neo Conservative spreading all sorts of lies and deceptions, including race denying nonsense all under the guise of some new religious/political system that would supposed save the entire world.
Fr. John, what is hilarious was that Stephen Douglas, Thomas Jefferson and all of them were not being honest about Negro Citizenship. The reason is this. The US Constitution denied Negroes US CITIZENSHIP, it said nothing about STATE CITIZENSHIP. This was likely because Madison, like Jefferson thought states should be supreme. In 1787, Free Negroes were citizens of every state excluding, Virginia, South Carolina and Georgia. They were also citizens in Vermont, Kentucky and Tennessee. They could do most things White Men could do. After 1800, states wisely began passing laws against this and by 1840, only Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine and Masschusetts allowed Negroes Universal Sufferage. New York also allowed them citizenship provided they owned real property. In 1842, Rhode Island conferred on them Universal Sufferage after previously outlawing it ca 1820.
Dred Scott vs Sanford 1857 again said that Negroes were not meant to be citizens of the United States BUT as the Supreme Court held no legislative authority over the States, said nothing about States making Negroes Citizens. In fact Mayor Fernando Wood of New York City seemed not to tell anyone that Negroes could legally vote in New York State probably to curry favor with the South.
This was and is the whole problem with States Rights. Jefferson/Madison’s whole idea rested upon the States doing that which is responsible. Thus states were given authority to confer citizenship, supervise marriages. The problem was states were feckless with their laws.
The Confederate Constitution clarified this matter greatly making Confederate Citizenship higher than State Citizenship, thus a person had to be a Citizen of the Confederacy to have protection under the laws, vote, etc. State antimiscengation laws still varied from Southern State to Southern State and sometimes someone considered White in Louisiana wouldn’t be considered so in Virginia, but no state allowed marriage or cohabitation between Full Blooded Negroids and Whites. That was what was so wonderful about the Confederate Constitution, it kept the States Rights that were good, and restricted the rights that could and had been abused under the 1787 document.
The only French I support are members of the National Front.
The Protestant reformation has destroyed our unity as a race. Even the Catholic faith has been infected with the disease of modernism. We must return to the true Catholic Church. A new Crusade is needed to take back our lands from the filthy mongrels! Revive Christendom!
Until we quit being political conservatives and start being racial conservationists none of this will change. On a different note I would emphasize that the Confederation Constitution also empowered State legislators to impeach Federal judges. The only thing I think that would come back and bite the CSA in the a*s had they won their Independence was the clause of the Confederate Constitution supporting free trade and banning tariffs.
Evangelicals were cucks for Jews so this should be no surprise. I never understood how a Christian could support someone who literally despises Jesus.
Look at how many of these freaks “speak in tongues” or believe in “faith healing” or believe in “money from God” or “snake handling.” Is it hard to imagine folks like this would have the slightest trouble believing that Afros are “gods children” just like themselves? Or that with their “Christian upbringing” they can transform young Ooga Booga into a promising rocket surgeon law-abiding taxpayer instead of pimp or drug dealer? Watch some evangelical preachers in action, Rafael Eduardo Cruz being a good representative example. Watch them “speak in tongues” on YouTube.
I’ve been saying for decades, the worry about Jewish influence is silly when we have some 100,000,000 white folks prattling gibberish at each other and writing checks to some con-man in certainty that God will repay their “seed money” a thousand fold.