Progressives are increasingly living in their own mental universe:
Note: David French believes that we can live with these people under “classical liberalism” without a shared moral consensus. See Part I here.
1/n Spent some time on LexisNexis over the weekend. Depending on your political orientation, what follows will either disturb or encourage you. But regardless of political orientation, I’m sure we can all say ‘holy fucking shit’
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
2/n Here’s ‘holy fucking shit’ #1 pic.twitter.com/KRVBl6ucIo
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
(#6) So many of these graphs look the same that, without the title, it looks like I’m simply reposting a single chart pic.twitter.com/iEoKxpubi1
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
(#7) If you’re looking for a job in a booming industry…. pic.twitter.com/nERSV7N2eH
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
(#8) Some of these terms (such as the one below) turn up so many results that I had to limit the search to a single news source pic.twitter.com/zw08WqX2GI
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
(#9) pic.twitter.com/XgOAzYCO2u
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
(#10) pic.twitter.com/nVDNOR0eDY
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
#11 pic.twitter.com/UiZ59GR9wp
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
#12 pic.twitter.com/jL390W7jwh
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
#13 I was telling @rasmansa that I don’t recall the term ‘people of color’ being used so frequently in previous years/decades. Maybe there’s something to this…? pic.twitter.com/3TfNWzOM5P
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
#14: One important thing to keep in mind is that only results for articles which LexisNexis has inventorized are going to turn up. For instance, the trend below technically begins in the 1980s; but only a handful of articles that LexisNexis has for this period mentions ‘racism’. pic.twitter.com/BkKyxberK7
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
#15: Clear Charlottesville effect pic.twitter.com/wi2nJoJXli
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
#16 Our future is intersectional pic.twitter.com/YNWk8XZ8g5
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
#17 ‘Unconscious bias’ is more frequency referred to than ‘implicit bias’, but had to check pic.twitter.com/TVTL3hu1nI
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
#18 During the 90s, the number of articles (at least on LexisNexis) mentioning ‘political correctness’ ranged from 4 (1990) to 380 (1990). 2007 was the first year this number entered into the 1000s (1056), which is where it’s stayed since 2013. pic.twitter.com/UmEDEwPt4U
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
And here’s the number of NYT articles mentioning ‘diversity’ pic.twitter.com/4mjOOrcebK
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 28, 2019
Original NYT Racism graph was actually an undercount. The search was generated with racism in quotations (and quotations should only be used when connecting two words). Here’s the corrected figure. Let me see if other graphs are similarly affected. pic.twitter.com/9C26W12ock
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 29, 2019
The ‘privilege’ NYT graph was also an undercount. Obviously, the word ‘privilege’ need not refer to social/racial privilege. I nevertheless find it interesting that its use has grown tremendously over the past few years. It could be just a coincidence, but I’m skeptical. pic.twitter.com/AilEduyvAZ
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 29, 2019
Update #2: Okay, I’ve finished one of them. Once again, using ‘the’ as a search term, I tabulated the number of results for NYT each year between 1980-2018. In the end, it seems that ‘racism’ mentions grew both in absolute terms *and* as a percent of all listed articles. pic.twitter.com/alCo8bZaXP
— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) May 29, 2019
If homosexuals and others don’t respect the free speech rights of straight white males, why should I respect their right to free speech?
“Progressives are increasingly living in their own mental universe:”
They live in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Especially in the French Revolution, Russian Civil War, Spanish Civil War, and the mid 1960’s.
For them, it’s Larping 1792, 1917, 1936 and 1968, all at the same time.
But like the Boomers and Oligarchs, they’re an impediment to us moving into the 21st Century. Which we should already be in, like the rest of the world, instead of stuck in 1980 and in 1945.
When the light at the end of the tunnel turns out to be the eternal fire of damnation…
It is statistical proof that they have been deliberately using meme warfare against Whites for a long time. Look at how the word racist didn’t exist in the English language until the 1930s. Then suddenly they make it up out of thin air, and go nuts repeating it over the decades:
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=racist&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cracist%3B%2Cc0
Think about he changes that happened in that time. WW2 against nationalism in Europe begins and nationalism was defeated. Segregation was forcibly ended in the United States, to be replaced with forced assimilation. Then the borders to all and only White countries were opened to non-Whites starting in the mid 1960s and foreigners were flooded into the USA at the rate of 90% non-White to 10% White, to change the racial makeup of a 90% White country. Now its 2019 and we are seeing the last Republican President. Free speech for Whites is ending, and Whites nearing hated minority status in the USA.
Anti-whites never get tired of repeating racist Nazi. The reason we got in this mess is we didn’t deal with these people on their own level.
YOU are main stream media not (((them))). But what’s your point ? Premise ? Desired goal ? Sheeple need to be led. You need a new news model.
“””…..Progressives are increasingly living in their own mental universe:…..”””
People with different brain structure see things differently. This is inborn defect not some teaching or brain washing or whatever popular myth people use to describe genetic white liberal behavior.
All diseases go worse under pressure. When you have weak back, then maybe in everyday life you don`t feel it but under pressure, construction work or military training, shit hit the fan.
Everyday mass hysteria is psychological pressure and it will affect mentally ill people.
For liberal behavior analyze, best event is medieval witch hunt. There is enough material for first well documented white liberal madness and no popular scapegoat`s like Jews or TV or standard mass education system or whatever .